Bionomics of Culex Pipiens Pipiens L., Culex Restuans Theob., and Culex Salinarius Coq

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bionomics of Culex Pipiens Pipiens L., Culex Restuans Theob., and Culex Salinarius Coq Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1981 Bionomics of Culex pipiens pipiens L., Culex restuans Theob., and Culex salinarius Coq. (Diptera: Culicidae) in central Iowa John Leslie Shipp Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Shipp, John Leslie, "Bionomics of Culex pipiens pipiens L., Culex restuans Theob., and Culex salinarius Coq. (Diptera: Culicidae) in central Iowa " (1981). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 6852. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/6852 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted you will find a target note listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. Requests can be made to our Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases we have filmed the best available copy. Universify Microfilms International 300 N. ZEEB RD., ANN ARBOR, Ml 48106 8122561 Smpp, JOHN LESLIE BIONOMICS OF CULEX PIPIENS PIPIENS L., CULEX RESTUANS THEOB., AND CULEX SALINARIUS COQ. (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) IN CENTRAL IOWA lom State University PH.D. 1981 University Microfilms Intern&tion&l 300 N. Zeeb Road, Aim Arbor,MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V . 1. Glossy photographs or pages \/^ 2. Colored illustrations, paper or print 3. Photographs with dark background 4. Illustrations are poor copy 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages 8. Print exceeds margin requirements 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print 11. Page(s) lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s) seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages numbered . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages 15. Other University Microfilms International Bionomics of Culex pipiens pipiens L. , Culex restuans Theob., and Culex salinarius Cog. (Diptera; Culicidae) in central Iowa by John Leslie Shipp A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department ; Entomology Major: Entomology (Medical Entomology) Approved : Signature was redacted for privacy. Signature was redacted for privacy. For the Major Department Signature was redacted for privacy. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 1981 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 4 Culex Mosquitoes 4 Culex pipiens pipiens L. 7 Culex restuans Theob. 16 Culex salinarius Coq. 22 Electrophoresis as a Means of Species Identification 28 MATERIALS AND METHODS 31 Description of Study Site 31 Description of Trapping Methods and Trapping Procedure 31 Species Identification 34 Parity in Culex Mosquitoes 35 Diapause in Culex Mosquitoes 38 Polyacrylamide-gel Disc Electrophoresis 39 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 50 Seasonal Abundance of Culex Mosquitoes 50 Parity Studies in Culex Mosquitoes 68 Diapause in Culex Mosquitoes 75 Electrophoretic Identification of Culex Species 84 SUMMARY 97 LITERATURE CITED 101 iii Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS APPENDIX; FORMULA 114 iv LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Anionic gel system 42 Table 2. Number of adult male Culex and egg rafts collected at Ames, Towa, 1978 and 1979 50 Table Al. Physiological saline for mosquitoes 114 V LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1. Electrophoretic gel tubes situated in the polymerization rack 44 Figure 2. Fluorescent light source 44 Figure 3. Upper and lower disc-electrophoresis chambers 48 Figure 4. Stained gel situated over the fluorescent light source 48 Figure 5. Seasonal abundance of Culex pipiens pipiens L. based on adult male collections at Ames, Iowa 53 Figure 6. Seasonal abundance of Culex pipiens pipiens L. based on egg raft collections at Ames, Iowa 55 Figure 7. Seasonal abundance of Culex restuans Theob. based on adult male collections at Ames, Iowa 58 Figure 8. Seasonal abundance of Culex restuans Theob. based on egg raft collections at Ames, Iowa 60 Figure 9. Seasonal abundance of Culex salinarius Coq. at Ames, Iowa, 197 9 63 Figure 10. Seasonal abundance of female Culex mosquitoes at Ames, Iowa, 1978 70 Figure 11. Seasonal abundance of female Culex mosquitoes at Ames, Iowa, 1979 72 Figure 12. Percentage of gravid Culex mosquitoes and fe­ male Culex with fat deposits of the over­ wintering type at Ames, Iowa, 1979 79 Figure 13. Seasonal abundance of gravid Culex mosquitoes at Ames, Iowa, 1978 82 Figure 14. Banding patterns of aldehyde dehydrogenase in nulliparous Culex mosquitoes 86 Figure 15. Isozyme patterns of aldehyde dehydrogenase in gels of nulliparous Culex pipiens pipiens L., Culex restuans Theob., and Culex salinarius Coq. 88 vi Page Figure 16. Banding patterns of aldehyde dehydrogenase in gravid Culex mosquitoes 88 Figure 17. Isozyme patterns of aldehyde dehydrogenase in gels of gravid Culex pipiens pipiens L., Ci^ex restuans Theob. , and Culex salinarius Coq. 9 2 1 INTRODUCTION Mosquitoes are vectors of several arboviruses such as Saint Louis encephalitis (SLE), western equine encephalomye­ litis (WEE), eastern equine encephalitis (EEE), and California encephalitis (CE) in North America. These encephalitides can significantly affect the health of humans and animals. Cases of arthropod-borne encephalitis have occurred in Iowa every year since 1967; the human cases usually involve LaCrosse (LAC) encephalitis which belongs to the CE group (W. A. Rowley, Department of Entomology, Iowa State University, unpublished data, 1980). An epidemic of SLE and WEE occurred in 1975, with 19 and 5 cases, respectively. The number of equine cases of WEE in Iowa yearly exceeds the number of human cases of all the arthropod-borne encephalitides (Dorsey et al., 1978). Two SLE and five WEE virus isolates have been obtained from Culex pipiens pipiens L., Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus Say, Culex restuans Theob., and Culex salinarius Coq. in Iowa from 1971-79 (Rowley et al., 1973; Dorsey et al., 1978; Wong et al., 1978; Rowley et al., 1979; W. A. Rowley, Department of Ento­ mology, Iowa State University, unpublished data, 1980). Adult females of these Culex species are morphologically similar and are difficult, if not impossible, to identify to species. This is especially the case if scales are missing as is the case in light trap specimens. However, adult males 2 and 4^^-stage larvae can be accurately identified. Recently, electrophoresis was employed to identify adult females of Cx. £. pipiens, Cx. p. quinquefasciatus, Cx. restuans, Cx. salinarius, and Culex territans Walk. (Saul et al., 1977). The importance of the Culex species (Cx. p. pipiens, Cx. restuans, and Cx. salinarius) to the natural history of SLE and WEE viruses is unknown in Iowa. The sympatric association of these species makes it difficult to attribute a virus isolation to one particular species. Culex p. pipiens is a primary vector of SLE in North America (Luby et al., 1969). However, it is questionable if Cx. p. pipiens transmits arbo­ viruses to humans, since these mosquitoes primarily feed on birds (Murphey et al., 1967; Ekis and Hagmann, 1968; Tempelis, 1975). It is possible that Cx. restuans and Cx. salinarius func­ tion in the natural history of SLE and WEE viruses. Both mosquito species transmit SLE virus, and become infected with WEE virus (Chamberlain et al., 1959; Hayes, 1979). Culex restuans feeds on birds (Murphey et al., 1967; Wright and DeFoliart, 1970). Culex salinarius feeds on humans (LeDuc et al., 1972; Edman, 1974). Important criteria for determining the vector status of mosquito species are: seasonal abundance; parity of females, and the time period of diapause induction. Some of these factors have been investigated for Cx. p. pipiens 3 but most have not been studied for Cx.
Recommended publications
  • Health Risk Assessment for the Introduction of Eastern Wild Turkeys (Meleagris Gallopavo Silvestris) Into Nova Scotia
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre: Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Newsletters & Publications for April 2004 Health risk assessment for the introduction of Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) into Nova Scotia A.S. Neimanis F.A. Leighton Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmccwhcnews Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Neimanis, A.S. and Leighton, F.A., "Health risk assessment for the introduction of Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) into Nova Scotia" (2004). Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre: Newsletters & Publications. 48. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmccwhcnews/48 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre: Newsletters & Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Health risk assessment for the introduction of Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) into Nova Scotia A.S. Neimanis and F.A. Leighton 30 April 2004 Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre Department of Veterinary Pathology Western College of Veterinary Medicine 52 Campus Dr. University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 5B4 Tel: 306-966-7281 Fax: 306-966-7439 [email protected] [email protected] 1 SUMMARY This health risk assessment evaluates potential health risks associated with a proposed introduction of wild turkeys to the Annapolis Valley of Nova Scotia. The preferred source for the turkeys would be the Province of Ontario, but alternative sources include the northeastern United States from Minnesota eastward and Tennessee northward.
    [Show full text]
  • Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Data-driven identification of potential Zika virus vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad A Dallas1,3, Barbara A Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8 1Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 2Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 3Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, United States; 4Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, United States; 5Department of Infectious Disease, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 6Center for Tropical Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 7Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 8River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, United States Abstract Zika is an emerging virus whose rapid spread is of great public health concern. Knowledge about transmission remains incomplete, especially concerning potential transmission in geographic areas in which it has not yet been introduced. To identify unknown vectors of Zika, we developed a data-driven model linking vector species and the Zika virus via vector-virus trait combinations that confer a propensity toward associations in an ecological network connecting flaviviruses and their mosquito vectors. Our model predicts that thirty-five species may be able to transmit the virus, seven of which are found in the continental United States, including Culex quinquefasciatus and Cx. pipiens. We suggest that empirical studies prioritize these species to confirm predictions of vector competence, enabling the correct identification of populations at risk for transmission within the United States. *For correspondence: mvevans@ DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22053.001 uga.edu Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification System for Mosquito Life Cycles: Life Cycle Types for Mosquitoes of the Northeastern United States
    June, 2004 Journal of Vector Ecology 1 Distinguished Achievement Award Presentation at the 2003 Society for Vector Ecology Meeting A classification system for mosquito life cycles: life cycle types for mosquitoes of the northeastern United States Wayne J. Crans Mosquito Research and Control, Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, 180 Jones Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, U.S.A. Received 8 January 2004; Accepted 16 January 2004 ABSTRACT: A system for the classification of mosquito life cycle types is presented for mosquito species found in the northeastern United States. Primary subdivisions include Univoltine Aedine, Multivoltine Aedine, Multivoltine Culex/Anopheles, and Unique Life Cycle Types. A montotypic subdivision groups life cycle types restricted to single species. The classification system recognizes 11 shared life cycle types and three that are limited to single species. Criteria for assignments include: 1) where the eggs are laid, 2) typical larval habitat, 3) number of generations per year, and 4) stage of the life cycle that overwinters. The 14 types in the northeast have been named for common model species. A list of species for each life cycle type is provided to serve as a teaching aid for students of mosquito biology. Journal of Vector Ecology 29 (1): 1-10. 2004. Keyword Index: Mosquito biology, larval mosquito habitats, classification of mosquito life cycles. INTRODUCTION strategies that do not fit into any of the four basic temperate types that Bates described in his book. Two There are currently more than 3,000 mosquito of the mosquitoes he suggested as model species occur species in the world grouped in 39 genera and 135 only in Europe and one of his temperate life cycle types subgenera (Clements 1992, Reinert 2000, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • North American Wetlands and Mosquito Control
    Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 4537-4605; doi:10.3390/ijerph9124537 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ISSN 1660-4601 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Article North American Wetlands and Mosquito Control Jorge R. Rey 1,*, William E. Walton 2, Roger J. Wolfe 3, C. Roxanne Connelly 1, Sheila M. O’Connell 1, Joe Berg 4, Gabrielle E. Sakolsky-Hoopes 5 and Aimlee D. Laderman 6 1 Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory and Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida-IFAS, Vero Beach, FL 342962, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.C.); [email protected] (S.M.O.C.) 2 Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Franklin, CT 06254, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Biohabitats, Inc., 2081 Clipper Park Road, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 Cape Cod Mosquito Control Project, Yarmouth Port, MA 02675, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 6 Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-772-778-7200 (ext. 136). Received: 11 September 2012; in revised form: 21 November 2012 / Accepted: 22 November 2012 / Published: 10 December 2012 Abstract: Wetlands are valuable habitats that provide important social, economic, and ecological services such as flood control, water quality improvement, carbon sequestration, pollutant removal, and primary/secondary production export to terrestrial and aquatic food chains. There is disagreement about the need for mosquito control in wetlands and about the techniques utilized for mosquito abatement and their impacts upon wetlands ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquito and Arbovirus Activity During 1997–2002 in a Wetland in Northeastern Mississippi
    VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES,SURVEILLANCE,PREVENTION Mosquito and Arbovirus Activity During 1997–2002 in a Wetland in Northeastern Mississippi E. W. CUPP,1 K. J. TENNESSEN,2, 3 W. K. OLDLAND,2 H. K. HASSAN,4 G. E. HILL,5 6 4 C. R. KATHOLI, AND T. R. UNNASCH J. Med. Entomol. 41(3): 495Ð501 (2004) ABSTRACT The species composition and population dynamics of adult mosquitoes in a wetland near Iuka, MS, were analyzed over a 6-yr period (1997Ð2002)and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR)detection rates of arboviruses determined during Þve of those years. Blood meals of three likely vector species were identiÞed using a PCR-based method that allows identiÞcation of the host to species. Culex erraticus (Dyar & Knab)composed 51.9% of the population during the 6-yr period with 295 females collected per trap night. Eastern equine encephalomyelitis (EEE)virus was detected in six genera of mosquitoes [Coquillettidia perturbans (Walker), Culex restuans Theobald, Culex salinarius Coquillett, Culex erraticus (Dyar & Knab), Anopheles crucians Wiedemann, Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say, Aedes vexans (Meigen), Ochlerotatus triseriatus Say, and Psorophora ferox Hum- boldt)with positive pools occurring in 1998, 1999, and 2002. Culiseta melanura Coquillett occurred at a low level (Ͻ1%)and was not infected. Saint Louis encephalitis virus was detected once in a single pool of Cx. erraticus in 1998. Neither West Nile virus nor LaCrosse virus was found. Minimum infection rates per 1000 females tested of competent vectors of EEE virus were variable and ranged from 0.14 for Cx. erraticus to 40.0 for Oc. triseriatus. Thirty-nine species of birds were identiÞed in the focus with blood-engorged mosquitoes found to contain meals (n ϭ 29)from eight avian species.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Arbovirus Surveillance Programs in the United States
    GUIDELINES FOR ARBOVIRUS SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS IN THE UNITED STATES C.G. Moore, R.G. McLean, C.J. Mitchell, R.S. Nasci, T.F. Tsai, C.H. Calisher, A.A. Marfin, P.S. Moore, and D.J. Gubler Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases National Center for Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Public Health Service U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Fort Collins, Colorado April, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 1 Purpose of The Guidelines ........................................................... 1 General Considerations ............................................................. 1 Seasonal Dynamics ................................................................ 2 Patch Dynamics and Landscape Ecology ................................................ 2 Meteorologic Data Monitoring ........................................................ 2 Vertebrate Host Surveillance ......................................................... 3 Domestic chickens .......................................................... 4 Free-ranging wild birds ...................................................... 5 Equines .................................................................. 5 Other domestic and wild mammals ............................................. 5 Mosquito Surveillance .............................................................. 6 Human Case Surveillance ........................................................... 6 Laboratory Methods to
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitoes and the Diseases They Transmit J
    B-6119 6-02 Mosquitoes and the Diseases they Transmit J. A. Jackman and J. K. Olson* osquitoes are among the most important The length of time that a mosquito takes to complete insect pests affecting the health of people its life cycle varies according to food availability, weath- er conditions and the species of mosquito. Under favor- and animals. Biting female mosquitoes not M able conditions, some mosquitoes can complete their only irritate people and animals, but they can also entire life cycle in only 8 to 10 days. transmit many disease-causing organisms. Egg Annoying populations of mosquitoes can occur any- where in Texas because there are habitats favorable for One way to identify mosquito species almost everywhere in the state. the breeding sites of mosquitoes is to find the To control mosquitoes effectively, it helps to under- eggs. Mosquito eggs may stand their life cycle, to be able to identify the various be laid in clusters called kinds of mosquitoes, and to know what steps work best rafts on the water sur- for the different species and specific locations. face. They may also be laid singly on the water Life history surface or in dry areas Adult mosquito laying eggs. Mosquitoes have four distinct stages during their life that are flooded periodi- cycle: egg, larva, pupa and adult. The adult stage is free- cally. flying; the other stages are aquatic. When first laid, mosquito eggs are white, but within a few hours they become dark brown to black. The shape and size of mosquito eggs vary, with most being football- shaped or boat-shaped and 0.02 to 0.04 inch long.
    [Show full text]
  • Culex Pipiens and Culex Restuans Egg Rafts Harbor Diverse Bacterial Communities Compared to Their Midgut Tissues Elijah O
    Juma et al. Parasites Vectors (2020) 13:532 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04408-4 Parasites & Vectors RESEARCH Open Access Culex pipiens and Culex restuans egg rafts harbor diverse bacterial communities compared to their midgut tissues Elijah O. Juma1*, Chang‑Hyun Kim2, Christopher Dunlap3, Brian F. Allan1 and Chris M. Stone2 Abstract Background: The bacterial communities associated with mosquito eggs are an essential component of the mos‑ quito microbiota, yet there are few studies characterizing and comparing the microbiota of mosquito eggs to other host tissues. Methods: We sampled gravid female Culex pipiens L. and Culex restuans Theobald from the feld, allowed them to oviposit in the laboratory, and characterized the bacterial communities associated with their egg rafts and midguts for comparison through MiSeq sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. Results: Bacterial richness was higher in egg rafts than in midguts for both species, and higher in Cx pipiens than Cx. restuans. The midgut samples of Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans were dominated by Providencia. Culex pipiens and Cx. res- tuans egg rafts samples were dominated by Ralstonia and Novosphingobium, respectively. NMDS ordination based on Bray‑Curtis distance matrix revealed that egg‑raft samples, or midgut tissues harbored similar bacterial communities regardless of the mosquito species. Within each mosquito species, there was a distinct clustering of bacterial commu‑ nities between egg raft and midgut tissues. Conclusion: These fndings expand the list of described bacterial communities associated with Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans and the additional characterization of the egg raft bacterial communities facilitates comparative analysis of mosquito host tissues, providing a basis for future studies seeking to understand any functional role of the bacterial communities in mosquito biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Culicidae) in USF Ecopreserve, Hillsborough County, Florida Emily Schwartz University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 4-7-2014 Spatiotemporal Distribution of Genus Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) in USF Ecopreserve, Hillsborough County, Florida Emily Schwartz University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Public Health Commons Scholar Commons Citation Schwartz, Emily, "Spatiotemporal Distribution of Genus Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) in USF Ecopreserve, Hillsborough County, Florida" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5122 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Spatiotemporal Distribution of Genus Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) in USF Ecopreserve, Hillsborough County, Florida by Emily Schwartz A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for degree of Masters of Public Health Department of Global Health College of Public Health University of South Florida Major Professor Robert Novak, Ph.D. Benjamin Jacob, Ph.D. Thomas Unnasch, Ph.D. Date of Approval: April 7, 2014 Keywords: Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus, West Nile Virus, St. Louis Encephalitis Virus, Arbovirus, Ecology Copyright 2014, Emily Schwartz ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Robert Novak for being a mentor who provided me with an abundance of tools for my future in public health. He has the passion and dedication, which I hope to reflect in my own career someday. Not only has he passed on knowledge and skills, but also helped guided by professional development by challenging me every step of the way.
    [Show full text]
  • 1960-1969 of NJMCA Annual Meetings
    Table of Contents for 1960-1969 of NJMCA Annual Meetings Proceedings of the Association's annual meetings are published each year. The table of contents for Proceedings issued from 1960-1969 are available below. In addition to the referenced papers each proceedings includes a list of the NJMCA Officers, Trustees, Past Presidents, Mosquito Extermination Commissions and Mosquito Control Agencies in New Jersey and Business Meeting minutes. Papers of the 1969 NJMCA Annual Meeting • State Mosquito Control Commission Approaches To Marsh Management, Jesse B. Leslie • After Vietnam, Leland G. Merrill • World Events Concerning Mosquitoes In 1967 , Helen Sollers-Riedel • Eastern Encephalitis In New Jersey During 1968 , Martin Goldfield, Oscar Sussman and Ronald Altman • Observations On Mosquito Control Activities Related To the 1968 Floods In New Jersey , Clyde F. Fehn • A Survey Of the Current Status And Future Plans For Wildlife Areas Along the Atlantic Coast , George P. Spinner • A Commissioner Looks At Costs Of Mosquito Control, Joel L. Schlesinger • The Role Of the Municipality In Mosquito Control, Alec Carton • Controlled Release Formulations For Use Against Aedes Aegypti , R. T. Taylor, J. W. Miles, G. O. Guerrant and G. D. Brooks • Some Recent Findings In Pesticide-Wildlife Relationships , Walter W. Dykstra • Methods Of Coordinating County And Municipal Programs , H. Cory Walling • Recent Advances In Mosquito Research At the University Of Massachusetts , T. Michael Peters, N. C. Greenough and P. Barbosa • Marsh Physiography: Influence On Distribution Of Intertidal Organisms , Edward G. Rocket • UCLA Mosquito Studies In Tonga-1968 , James C. Hitchcock • Mosquito Control Activities Of the First Marine Division(Rein) FMF, Republic Of Vietnam, L.
    [Show full text]
  • P2699 Identification Guide to Adult Mosquitoes in Mississippi
    Identification Guide to Adult Mosquitoes in Mississippi es Identification Guide to Adult Mosquitoes in Mississippi By Wendy C. Varnado, Jerome Goddard, and Bruce Harrison Cover photo by Dr. Blake Layton, Mississippi State University Extension Service. Preface Entomology, and Plant Pathology at Mississippi State University, provided helpful comments and Mosquitoes and the diseases they transmit are in- other supportIdentification for publication and ofGeographical this book. Most Distri- creasing in frequency and geographic distribution. butionfigures of used the inMosquitoes this book of are North from America, Darsie, R. North F. and As many as 1,000 people were exposed recently ofWard, Mexico R. A., to dengue fever during an outbreak in the Florida Mos- Keys. “New” mosquito-borne diseases such as quitoes of, NorthUniversity America Press of Florida, Gainesville, West Nile and Chikungunya have increased pub- FL, 2005, and Carpenter, S. and LaCasse, W., lic awareness about disease potential from these , University of California notorious pests. Press, Berkeley, CA, 1955. None of these figures are This book was written to provide citizens, protected under current copyrights. public health workers, school teachers, and other Introduction interested parties with a hands-on, user-friendly guide to Mississippi mosquitoes. The book’s util- and Background ity may vary with each user group, and that’s OK; some will want or need more detail than others. Nonetheless, the information provided will allow There has never been a systematic, statewide you to identify mosquitoes found in Mississippi study of mosquitoes in Mississippi. Various au- with a fair degree of accuracy. For more informa- thors have reported mosquito collection records tion about mosquito species occurring in the state as a result of surveys of military installations in and diseases they may transmit, contact the ento- the state and/or public health malaria inspec- mology staff at the Mississippi State Department of tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Culex Pipiens and Culex Restuans Mosquitoes Harbor Distinct Microbiota Dominated by Few Bacterial Taxa Ephantus J
    Muturi et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:18 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1299-6 RESEARCH Open Access Culex pipiens and Culex restuans mosquitoes harbor distinct microbiota dominated by few bacterial taxa Ephantus J. Muturi1*, Chang-Hyun Kim1, Jeffrey Bara2, Elizabeth M. Bach1 and Madhura H. Siddappaji1 Abstract Background: Mosquitoes host diverse microbial communities that influence many aspects of their biology including reproduction, digestion, and ability to transmit pathogens. Unraveling the composition, structure, and function of these microbiota can provide new opportunities for exploiting microbial function for mosquito-borne disease control. Methods: MiSeq® sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons was used to characterize the microbiota of adult females of Culex pipiens L. and Cx. restuans Theobald collected from nine study sites in central Illinois. Results: Out of 195 bacterial OTUs that were identified, 86 were shared between the two mosquito species while 16 and93OTUswereuniquetoCx. pipiens and Cx. restuans, respectively. The composition and structure of microbial communities differed significantly between the two mosquito species with Cx. restuans hosting a more diverse bacterial community compared to Cx. pipiens. Wolbachia (OTU836919) was the dominant bacterial species in Cx. pipiens accounting for 91 % of total microbiota while Sphingomonas (OTU817982) was the dominant bacterial species in Cx. restuans accounting for 31 % of total microbiota. Only 3 and 6 OTUs occurred in over 60 % of individuals in Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans, respectively. There was little effect of study site on bacterial community structure of either mosquito species. Conclusion: These results suggest that the two mosquito species support distinct microbial communities that are sparsely distributed between individuals.
    [Show full text]