DOCSLIB.ORG

Richard Iii (Plays in Performance) Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Richard Iii (Plays in Performance) Pdf, Epub, Ebook RICHARD III (PLAYS IN PERFORMANCE) PDF, EPUB, EBOOK William Shakespeare | 266 pages | 01 May 1981 | ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD | 9780389201847 | English | Lanham, United States Richard III (Plays in Performance) PDF Book Richard has Hastings executed when he opposes his bid for the crown. Act 1 Richard has designs on the throne, and has plotted against his elder brother George, Duke of Clarence, who is taken to imprisonment in the Tower where Gloucester later has him murdered. Finally - and most innovatively - there is a CD at the back, which provides many and various extracts from the play. His eldest brother is now king, as Edward IV. Be sure to bring sunscreen if you go to that one. For information on how we process your data, read our Privacy Policy. A sixth quarto was printed for Law by Thomas Purfoot in For the events of the play, Shakespeare relied mainly on the chronicles of Raphael Holinshed and, to a lesser extent, Edward Hall. Davis's subject starts at a place of bodily incompleteness. Davis, Lennard J. The Murder of the Princes in the Tower. He announces his intention of marrying Elizabeth of York, and so ending the civil wars between York and Lancaster. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, , p. Act 5 Buckingham is led off to execution. The Sourcebooks Shakespeare brings Shakespeare's plays to life in a revolutionary new book and CD format. Please enter your comment! Significantly, the most striking instance of this maneuver occurs in his soliloquy at the end of the scene when he seduces Anne. Although Richard's body appears singularly deficient among the other characters in the play, he relies upon the multiple significations of his deformities as a technology of performance to aid his bid for power, not impede it. Lisa Nasson Citizen 4. He is a canny manipulator and can charm people after a fashion , even people who find him detestable and monstrous. Hill Lady Anne. Privacy Policy Privacy Policy. My dukedom to a beggarly denier , I do mistake my person all this while. Burnett, Mark Thornton. On the night before the Battle of Bosworth Field , Richard is haunted by the ghosts of all whom he has murdered. The night before the opposing armies meet in battle, King Richard is visited by the ghosts of his many victims, including Henry VI, the Duke of Clarence, the two young princes, and his wife Lady Anne. Lucy Peacock Queen Elizabeth. Garber, Marjorie. In order to clear a path to the throne, Richard sets about killing his brother Clarence and adding to the stresses and strains already borne by Edward IV, who is in poor health. The CDs reinforce the beauty and power of the language in performance, and will undoubtedly enhance anyone's understanding and enjoyment of Shakespeare's plays, as they were meant to be experienced. Return to Text As such, they distance themselves from other readings of Richard, such as Kriegel's, for whom "Richard III represents an early example of stigmatizing cultural dictates to which even Shakespeare capitulated" quoted in Mitchell and Snyder 18 , pointing out, "The only critical certainty has been that in Richard's own 'distorted' features his character recognizes an avocation" The death of Clarence, The Mirour for Magistrates , Richard III (Plays in Performance) Writer Third quarto, Railing at the Yorkists, she recalls the crimes committed during the time of Henry VI that justify their present sufferings. Richard goes on to flatter Lady Anne suggesting that he murdered her husband because he wanted to be with her:. King Richard III. He is almost surprised by himself and acknowledges the power of his manipulation. By defining his villainy as a theatrical tour de force, Richard invites the playgoers to evaluate his actions simply as theatrical performances. Following Garland-Thomson, who argues that "disability is a broad term within which cluster ideological categories as varied as sick, deformed, ugly, etc…" , I would suggest that we pay greater attention to distinguishing between and among these ideological categories in Renaissance formulations. Richard is shrewdly aware of his resources, arguing in act five that his cultural power of kingship matches the size of his army as a resource. Buckingham's description rejects the deterministic logic the monstrous birth attempts to imply and instead identifies Richard with his patriarchal lineage. Now are our brows bound with victorious wreaths, Our bruised arms hung up for monuments, Our stern alarums changed to merry meetings, Our dreadful marches to delightful measures. Because of the interpretation it invites, his body distracts Richard's audience from his political machinations. He comes to the front of the stage to share his wicked plots with the audience, steps back into the upstage frame of dramatic representation to execute them upon the other characters, and then returns to the forestage to boast to the audience about the efficacy of his performance. Nor is Richard ever described as a 'monster': he is simply a composite of 'monstrous' markers and behaviours. Aesthetic Nervousness. Recognizing the contingent and constructed elements of reality rather than relying on a natural sufficiency or a natural independence, "the dismodernist subject sees that metanarratives are only 'socially created' and accepts them as that, gaining help and relying on legislation, law, and technology" Davis The effect when they knelt was of Richard sitting on top of…. Bending Over Backwards. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, When Richard is spat at, he wipes his face and licks his gloved finger. At Bristol Old Vic until 9 March. Thu 7 Mar Richard's actions demonstrate a progression: working in the past, he projected a false future that has turned the king against Clarence and secured his present action. The body was one signifier in an elaborate network of signification" Registrants will receive a link to participate in this vital conversation. At the same time, critics read Richard's relation to his body through the lens of a pre-modern notion of disability that construes bodily deformity as the visible sign of moral evil. It is precisely this display, manipulation, and rhetorical embellishment of his distinctive body that enables his bid for the throne. Richard III is reminiscent of Lady Macbeth in that they are both ambitious, murderous and manipulate others for their own ends. Printed partly from the fourth quarto and partly from the third. Do you have questions or feedback for the Folger Shakespeare team? Print Cite. DC Metro Theater Arts. Charnes has a useful overview of cultural attitudes toward monstrosity that are mapped onto Richard's body. Lee Jamieson. Davis's notion of the dismodern subject suggests reading disability as a set of relations between the body and the world, relations in which physical difference may be aided by compensatory intervention and used for powerful effect. In the present, he stakes his moral corruption on the immediacy of revenge, claiming that both the plots and his present-day assurances are based on future, projected misfortunes. Eventually, those enemies unite against him under the leadership of Henry Tudor. Get in touch here! Charnes points out that Richard uses his bodily distinctiveness to engineer a substitution of his deformed body for the imaginary king's body: "Gaining the crown will enable him to effect a kind of trade in which he imagines that he exchange his misshapen half made-up body for the 'King's Body' and its divine perfection" 32 , while Mitchell and Snyder make a similar claim that Richard "embodies that chaos of a moment in England's history, while his physical differences underline his own metaphysical fitness to govern" Sex, in fact, figured prominently in denunciations of the theater. Complete copy from the Folger Shakespeare Library. Richard III (Plays in Performance) Reviews Contrastingly, Richard also harnesses the performance possibilities of his distinctive body to the fullest negative effect over the course of the first act. Both Nashe and Heywood used the example of the English history play to argue that playgoing could make the lessons of history accessible to the ignorant and unlearned. Printed from the sixth quarto. King Richard III. These open-air performances are family-friendly. Get even more from the Folger You can get your own copy of this text to keep. Please note that this product is not available for purchase from Bloomsbury. If he cannot have love, he will monopolise hate. Paul is right — this is obviously propaganda for the Tudors rather than history. Return to Text Davis points out that "disability, as we know the concept, is really a socially driven relation to the body that became relatively organized in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries" 3. By the third act of the play, Richard has so successfully shifted the focus of political sovereignty that Buckingham is able to plead his cause to the people of the realm without a single reference to the body Richard so displayed in the first act. Naked villainy: behind the scenes of Richard III — in pictures. Richard's manipulation of audience response to his form continues as he presents his body as a kind of prop to his actions. Return to Text Following Garland-Thomson, who argues that "disability is a broad term within which cluster ideological categories as varied as sick, deformed, ugly, etc…" , I would suggest that we pay greater attention to distinguishing between and among these ideological categories in Renaissance formulations. Return to Text In fact, Charnes argues, Richard's relation to the women in the play is one of forced association that Richard tries to reject: "Like the female figures in the play, Richard is marked as other, as the antithesis of the 'marvellous proper man'" The first quarto was printed for Wise shortly afterwards, by the printers Valentine Simmes and Peter Short.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The History, Printing, and Editing of the Returne from Pernassus
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1-2009 The History, Printing, and Editing of The Returne from Pernassus Christopher A. Adams College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Recommended Citation Adams, Christopher A., "The History, Printing, and Editing of The Returne from Pernassus" (2009). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 237. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/237 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The History, Printing, and Editing of The Returne from Pernassus A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in English from The College of William and Mary by Christopher A. Adams Accepted for____________________________ (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors ) _________________________ ___________________________ Paula Blank , Director Monica Potkay , Committee Chair English Department English Department _________________________ ___________________________ Erin Minear George Greenia English Department Modern Language Department Williamsburg, VA December, 2008 1 The History, Printing, and Editing of The Returne from Pernassus 2 Dominus illuminatio mea -ceiling panels of Duke Humfrey’s Library, Oxford 3 Acknowledgments I am deeply indebted to my former adviser, Dr. R. Carter Hailey, for starting me on this pilgrimage with the Parnassus plays. He not only introduced me to the world of Parnassus , but also to the wider world of bibliography. Through his help and guidance I have discovered a fascinating field of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Warrior Queens in Holinshed's Woodcuts
    Cahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistes Journal of medieval and humanistic studies 23 | 2012 Pour une poétique de l'exemplum courtois Warrior Queens in Holinshed’s Woodcuts Samantha Frénée Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/crm/12859 DOI: 10.4000/crm.12859 ISSN: 2273-0893 Publisher Classiques Garnier Printed version Date of publication: 30 June 2012 Number of pages: 417-433 ISSN: 2115-6360 Electronic reference Samantha Frénée, « Warrior Queens in Holinshed’s Woodcuts », Cahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistes [Online], 23 | 2012, Online since 30 June 2015, connection on 15 October 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/crm/12859 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/crm.12859 © Cahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistes Warrior Queens in Holinshed’s Woodcuts Abstract: One of the most under-investigated aspects of Raphael Holinshed’s Chronicles must be the study of the visual representations of British history that we find in the first edition of 1577. This article focuses on the woodcuts used in Holinshed’s Chronicles to illustrate the representation of warrior queens in England and surprisingly we find only two: Cordeilla and Boudica, from Britain’s prehistory and ancient history. It describes and analyses these images in order to demonstrate the historiographical and political objective of such works. This article also reviews the information known about the artist and tries to understand why these pictures were removed from the second edition of 1587. Résumé: Un des aspects les plus négligés des Chronicles de Raphael Holinshed est certainement l’étude des représentations visuelles de l’histoire britannique que nous trouvons dans la première édition de 1577.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright 2011 Tara Lynn Lyons
    Copyright 2011 Tara Lynn Lyons ENGLISH PRINTED DRAMA IN COLLECTION BEFORE JONSON AND SHAKESPEARE BY TARA LYNN LYONS DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Emerita Professor Carol T. Neely, Chair Associate Professor Zachary L. Lesser, University of Pennsylvania Associate Professor Lori Humphrey Newcomb Professor Curtis Perry Abstract Benjamin Jonson’s Works (1616) and William Shakespeare’s Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies (1623) overwhelmingly dominate studies of the English drama collection. This critical focus has revealed much of what we know about the collection as a format for dramatic texts in early modern England, but it has also concealed aspects of the format’s history. Scholars regularly assume that the Jonson and Shakespeare Folios were the first in England to gather dramatic texts in collections; others often treat the volumes as paradigms for how drama collections looked, functioned, and signified. By examining collections printed or compiled from approximately 1512 to 1623, “English Printed Drama in Collection Before Jonson and Shakespeare” offers a new conceptualization of the collection. This dissertation discovers that drama appeared in multiple collected formats other than large folio volumes and was organized around a diversity of principles of collection other than (and in addition to) “the author.” For example, drama was presented in ten-play quarto editions supporting humanist pedagogical agendas, reader-compiled octavo miscellanies created for political persuasion, and serially published sets celebrating the English church and crown. This diversity of collected forms was constructed through different material processes to support the financial and/or ideological aims of various agents, including printers, publishers, booksellers, editors, and readers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Context of Macbeth
    The Historical Context of Macbeth EXPLORING Shakespeare, 2003 Shakespeare wrote Macbeth sometime between 1605 and 1606, shortly after the ascension of King James of Scotland to the English throne. The new monarch brought Scotland—previously known to the English only as a mysterious, conquered neighbor—into the public limelight. The period of James' reign was further marked by political and religious conflict, much of which focused the kingdom's attention on the danger of regicide. Events in History at the Time of the Play Sources Following the process used in the creation of many of his plays, Shakespeare drew the plot for Macbeth from historical sources—particularly Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland (1577), the authoritative historical text of the period. Although Holinshed contains the story of Macbeth and Duncan, Shakespeare did not rely on this only; rather, he combined different stories and different versions of the same story to create his drama. The Chronicles include an account of King Malcolm II (reigned 1005-34), whose throne passed first to Duncan I (reigned 1034-40) and then to Macbeth (reigned 1040-57), both of whom were his grandsons. For his portrayal of the murder through which Macbeth took Duncan's throne, Shakespeare mined another vein of the Chronicles—King Duff's death at the hands of one of his retainers, Donwald. In combining the two events, Shakespeare crafted a specific tone for the tale of regicide. When King Malcolm II of Scotland died in 1034, his last command was that the throne should pass to his oldest grandson, Duncan.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry V Play Guide
    Henry V photo: Charles Gorrill by William Shakespeare Theatre Pro Rata November 5-20, 2016 Performing at The Crane Theater 2303 Kennedy St NE, Minneapolis The play Henry V is part of a series of eight plays that covers a critical time in English history: from the reign of Richard II to the death of Richard III and the ascension to the throne of Henry Tudor (Henry VII), the grandfather of Queen Elizabeth. The first four play sequence, Henry VI, parts 1, 2, and 3, and Richard III (1589- 94) were great hits when first produced, and were certainly part of the impetus for the second four play sequence chronicling the “back story” of the first (Richard II, Henry IV, parts 1 and 2, and Henry V). The first source to mention Shakespeare, Greene’s Groats-worth of Wit, was published in 1592, and parodies a line from Henry VI, part 3. Shakespeare based his work on history written by Raphael Holinshed (who drew on earlier work by Edward Hall); but these histories were those of the victors, so not all the information was accurate. Later historians have corrected information from Hall and Holinshed that was often as much mythology as history. Critical facts about Henry V that are reflected in the play: Born: summer 1386; died 31 August 1422 Ascended to the throne: 20 March 1413 Victory at Agincourt: 25 October 1415 He was the first king of England to grow up speaking and writing fluently in English; previous kings spoke either French or Saxon. The play was originally written/produced in 1599, and played at the court of King James 1 on January 7, 1605.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Intertraffic
    INTERTRAFFIC: TRANSNATIONAL LITERATURES AND LANGUAGES IN LATE RENAISSANCE ENGLAND AND EUROPE1 Warren Boutcher In the English edition published at London in 1603, John Florio and Samuel Daniel described Montaigne’s Essais as a work of transnational literature. Consider what the paratexts and associated documents reveal about the circumstances of production of this translation.2 Florio, whose father had taken him to Switzerland during the Marian exile, was teaching Italian and French in noble aristocratic households that employed many fellow religious refugees as tutors. These languages were needed by his noble mistresses and their male relatives for the entertainment of important strangers present in England – and in their homes – for diplomatic purposes, whether official or unofficial. The households’ collections – including those of the tutors themselves 1 I am very grateful to the organisers of the 5th Annual St. Andrews Book Conference, ‘International Exchange in the European Book World’, 20-22 June 2013 (especially Matthew McLean and Andrew Pettegree), the participants in the ‘Transnational Literatures’ roundtable at the Renaissance Society of America conference in New York (27-29 March 2014), the members of the University of Leeds Interdisciplinary Renaissance and Early Modern Seminar (especially Alex Bamji), and the participants in the ‘Narrative Conversions’ workshop at the University of York, June 2-3 2014 (especially Helen Smith and Simon Ditchfield). 2 This and the following four paragraphs are based on the biographical entries for John Florio, Edward Blount, and William Ponsonby in the ODNB, Michelangelo Florio in the DBI, the paratexts to the three volumes of Michel de Montaigne, The essayes or morall, politike and millitarie discourses, trans.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreams in Early Modern England: Frameworks of Interpretation
    Dreams in Early Modern England: Frameworks of Interpretation by Janine Rivière A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of PhD Graduate Department of History, University of Toronto. © Copyright by Janine Rivière (2013) Abstract Dreams in Early Modern England: Frameworks of Interpretation, PhD (2013), Janine Rivière, Graduate Department of History, University of Toronto. While dreams as visions have received much attention from historians, less work has been undertaken on understanding more commonly experienced dreams that occurred in sleep. In this dissertation I seek to begin redressing this neglect. Two overarching questions focus the dissertation: How did early modern English people understand their dreams? And did these understandings change in response to significant developments in English culture? To answer these questions I explore early modern English theories, beliefs and experiences of dreams through a close study of key medical, demonological, philosophical, spiritual, oneirocritic and private writings. I suggest that in the period 1550-1750 there were three principal frameworks used to understand dreams: (1) health of the body and mind, (2) prediction and (3) spirituality. These three frameworks coexisted, either reinforcing or contesting one another throughout the period. The framework of health saw dreams as natural products of the body and mind that revealed the overall health of the dreamer. In the model of prediction, dreams were deemed significant, yet encoded, clues to the future that required careful interpretation. Finally, in spiritual frameworks, dreams were conceived as sent by God, angels or the Devil. Since early modern English writings reveal a diversity of natural and supernatural theories about dreams that never really “declined,” a study of them also helps to complicate ideas about the “disenchantment of the world." Finally, I also suggest that early modern English writings on dreams reveal the perceived vulnerability of the dreamer to internal and external forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Det. 1.2.2 Quartos 1594-1609.Pdf
    author registered year of title printer stationer value editions edition Anon. 6 February 1594 to John 1594 The most lamentable Romaine tragedie of Titus Iohn Danter Edward White & "rather good" 1600, 1611 Danter Andronicus as it was plaide by the Right Honourable Thomas Millington the Earle of Darbie, Earle of Pembrooke, and Earle of Sussex their seruants Anon. 2 May 1594 1594 A Pleasant Conceited Historie, Called the Taming of Peter Short Cuthbert Burby bad a Shrew. As it was sundry times acted by the Right honorable the Earle of Pembrook his seruants. Anon. 12 March 1594 to Thomas 1594 The First Part of the Contention Betwixt the Two Thomas Creede Thomas Millington bad 1600 Millington Famous Houses of Yorke and Lancaster . [Henry VI Part 2] Anon. 1595 The true tragedie of Richard Duke of York , and P. S. [Peter Short] Thomas Millington bad 1600 the death of good King Henrie the Sixt, with the whole contention betweene the two houses Lancaster and Yorke, as it was sundrie times acted by the Right Honourable the Earle of Pembrooke his seruants [Henry VI Part 3] Anon. 1597 An excellent conceited tragedie of Romeo and Iuliet. Iohn Danter [and bad As it hath been often (with great applause) plaid Edward Allde] publiquely, by the Right Honourable the L. of Hunsdon his seruants Anon. 29 August 1597 to Andrew 1597 The tragedie of King Richard the second. As it hath Valentine Simmes Andrew Wise "rather good" Wise been publikely acted by the Right Honourable the Lorde Chamberlaine his seruants. William Shake-speare [29 Aug 1597] 1598 The tragedie of King Richard the second.
    [Show full text]
  • Macbeth by William Shakespeare
    CC 4 Semester II British Poetry and Drama:14th to 17th Centuries Macbeth by William Shakespeare A Short Analysis Macbeth is, along with the character of Iago in Othello and his earlier portrayal of Richard III, William Shakespeare’s most powerful exploration and analysis of evil. Although we can find precursors to Macbeth in the murderer-turned-conscience-stricken-men of Shakespeare’s earlier plays – notably the conspirator Brutus in Julius Caesar and Claudius in Hamlet – Macbeth provides us with a closer and more complex examination of how a brave man with everything going for him might be corrupted by ambition and goading into committing an act of murder. It’s worth examining how Shakespeare creates such a powerful depiction of one man persuaded to do evil and then wracked by his conscience for doing so. The sources for Shakespeare’s Macbeth Macbeth was a real Scottish king, although he was somewhat different from the ambitious, murderous creation of William Shakespeare. His wife was real too, but Lady Macbeth’s real name was Gruoch and Macbeth’s real name was Mac Bethad mac Findlaích. The real Macbeth killed Duncan in battle in 1040 and Macbeth (or Mac Bethad) actually went on to rule for 17 years, until he was killed and Macbeth’s stepson, known as Lulach the Idiot, became king (though he only ruled for less than a year – then Malcolm, as Malcolm III, took the crown). Where did Shakespeare get the story from, then, and what did he change? The plot of Shakespeare’s Macbeth is a combination of two stories: the story of Macbeth and the story of the murder of King Duffe by Donwald and his wife, which Shakespeare read about in Raphael Holinshed’s Chronicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Macbeth Navigator: Excerpts from Holinshed's Chronicles, Volume V
    Macbeth Navigator: Excerpts from Holinshed's Chronicles, Volume V: Scotland [Shakespeare's primary source for Macbeth was Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland, first published in 1577. The outlines of Shakespeare's story are derived from Holinshed's account of Kings Duncan and Macbeth. In addition, Shakespeare seems to have taken many particulars from Holinshed's account of King Duffe, who died eighty years before Macbeth did.] Source of these excerpts: Holinshed, Raphael. Holinshed's Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland, 5. London: J. Johnson, et al, 1808. Index: King Duncan and King Macbeth: • from page 264: Duncan's ascension to the throne of Scotland. | The kinship between Duncan and Macbeth. • page 265: The characters of Duncan and Macbeth compared. | The defeat of Macdonwald by Banquo and Macbeth. • from page 266: Macbeth's cruelty to Macdonwald. | The arrival in Scotland of Sweno. • from page 267: Sweno defeated by Duncan's trick. • from page 268: Macbeth and Banquo repel an invasion by King Canute of England, who pays them "a great summe of gold" to be allowed to bury his dead at "saint Colmes Inch." | Macbeth and Banquo encounter "thrée women in strange and wild apparell." • page 269: Macbeth becomes Thane of Cawdor | Duncan proclaims Malcom Prince of Cumberland | Macbeth and Banquo slay King Duncan, and Macbeth ascends the throne. | Malcolm and Donalbain flee. | Macbeth sets the kingdom to rights, punishing evildoers. • from page 270: Macbeth's good deeds as king. • from page 271: Macbeth has Banquo murdered, but Fleance escapes. | How Fleance's descendants become Kings of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Macbeth
    ‘My father what? Had a duel? He’s in his seventies! Silly man!’ so might antiquarian, James Byres of Tonley have exclaimed when he was brought word about the unseemly quarrel occasioned by Byres Snr. Patrick Byres was an Irish Jacobite, born in Dublin, 1713. In 1741 he married Janet Moir of Stoneywood and became a Burgess of Guild in Aberdeen, yet his political leanings and hot Celtic temper seem to have constantly landed Patrick in trouble. His first problem was his involvement in the Forty-Five Rebellion, fighting on Bonnie Prince Charlie’s side as Major Byres in Stoneywood’s regiment. Escaping Culloden, Patrick’s ally, Gordon of Cluny hid him in his castle until he and his family escaped to France. He managed to hang on to Tonley by the clever suggestion that his English name was Peter, thus he was not Patrick Byres the rebel. While his youngest sons, William and John developed military careers in the Navy and Royal Engineers respectively and second son, Robert took up merchant interests in Prussia, the eldest, James, became something of a tour guide. He embraced antiquarian studies in Rome and became the go-to ex-pat for visiting Scots gentlefolk on their ‘grand tours’ of Europe. Meanwhile, his father returned to Tonley, Mrs Byres hoping her husband’s adventures were over. But, due to Janet’s nephew, James Abernethy of Mayen, Patrick was to be the centre of unwanted attention once more in 1763. A traditional ballad is dedicated to the incident in which John Leith of Leith Hall, Rhynie was murdered by Abernethy after an argument in the New Inn, Aberdeen.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard II in (5.V.111–2)
    Dating Shakespeare’s Plays: The life and deat h of King Richard the second he composition of the play Richard II in (5.v.111–2). While Q1’s author was anonymous, its Quarto form can be assigned anywhere Q2 attributed the play to Shakespeare. between 1587 (the second edition of Q3 appeared in the same year but without the THolinshed) and 1597, the publication of the first frontispiece: quarto. [Q3 1598] The Tragedie of King Richard the second. As it hath beene publikely acted by the Publication Date Right Honourable the Lord Chamberlaine his seruants. By William Shake-speare. London The Tragedy of Richard II was first published in Printed by Valentine Simmes, for Andrew quarto in 1597 and seems to have sold very well. It Wise, and are to be solde at his shop in Paules appeared twice in 1598, with two further quartos churchyard, at the signe of the Angel. 1598. before the First Folio. In 1603, the play was tranferred to Matthew Law: [SR 1597] 29° Augusti. Andrew Wise. Entred for his Copie by appoyntment from master [SR 1603] 25 Junij. Mathew Lawe. Entred Warden Man, The Tragedye of Richard the for his copies in full courte Holden this Second vjd. Day. These ffyve copies folowinge . viz [Q1 1597] The Tragedie of King Richard the iij enterludes or playes . The second of second. As it hath beene publikely acted by the Richard the 2. ... all kinges ... all whiche by right Honourable the Lorde Chamberlaine consent of the Company are sett over to him his Seruants. London Printed by Valentine from Andrew Wyse.
    [Show full text]