Weekend Edition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Weekend Edition Vol. XXVII, Number 84 • Friday, July 21, 2006 ■ 50¢ Check out the Weekly’s new online classifieds at fogster.com WeeklyWeekend Edition The magic of Mozart www.PaloAltoOnline.com Page 13 The camera eye Midpeninsula residents explore the inner world of flowers Page 9 Norbert von der Groeben Worth A Look 14 Eating Out 15 Movie Times 22 Goings On 25 Crossword Puzzle Inside ■ Upfront A comeback for fiber ring? Page 3 ■ Sports Local girls head for national track meets Page 29 ■ Home And Real Estate Escape from the heat Inside LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL UNIVERSITY Provided by Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Your Child’s Health University Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital offers classes and seminars designed to foster good health and enhance the lives of parents and children. F PREPARING FOR MULTIPLES Are you expecting twins, triplets or more? With the potential for early delivery, parents of multiples should schedule a childbirth course in advance to learn everything there is to know about delivering and caring for multiple infants. - Monday, July 24 & 31 F CESAREAN BIRTH CLASS This two-hour class is taught by a labor and delivery nurse childbirth educator who helps prepare families for cesarean delivery. Information about vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) will also be discussed. - Wednesday, August 2 F MULTIPLES BREASTFEEDING SEMINAR Specifically designed for those who are planning to breastfeed twins or more, participate in this discussion with a certified lactation consultant who is focused on your special needs. This seminar is only offered every 2–3 months, so we encourage you to join us. - Thursday, August 3 F BREASTFEEDING SEMINAR While breastfeeding is natural, the process may not come as naturally as one might expect. Our certified lactation consultant provides tips for breastfeeding success as well as information about prenatal preparation for breastfeeding. - Tuesday, August 29 Call (650) 723-4600 or visit www.lpch.org to register or obtain more information on the times, locations and fees for these and other courses. LUCILE PACKARD CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL CALL TODAY TO SIGN UP FOR CLASSES (650) 723-4600 Page 2 • Friday, July 21, 2006 • Palo Alto Weekly UpfrontLocal news, information and analysis Could fiber ring be making a comeback? Council finance committee ing some details. cost estimated as high as $40 mil- RFP document said they would They agreed to keep the bid-so- lion, was rejected as too risky by the make the changes in time to submit approves request for proposals licitation as open-ended as possible council. to the full council in early August, by Jay Thorwaldson to see what kind of proposals the Wi-Fi (wireless fidelity) service just before the council’s annual city receives. The plan envisions a could be included as well, although month-long break. so-called “public-private Council’s Finance Committee. private entity helping the city install a possible countywide or regional The plan envisions providing a partnership” to provide Palo Committee Chair Yoriko Kishi- a fiber-optic system throughout the Wi-Fi system is in the works for two-way 100-megabit-per-second A Alto homes with access to moto and members Larry Klein and community, as opposed to a major Silicon Valley. service throughout the community, some type of high-speed broadband Bern Beecham approved a “request city-only investment. Last year, a Administrative Services Director with a possible delay for homes west Internet connection was recom- for proposals” after reviewing it plan for the city to install a fiber- Carl Yeats and other staff members of I-280 in the sparsely populated mended Tuesday night by the City with city staff members and tweak- to-the-home (FTTH) network, at a who worked on the half-inch-thick (continued on page 5) TRANSPORTATION Bicyclist asks for safer Stanford Avenue No immediate plan in the works by Bill D’Agostino ocal bicycle advocates hope to get some upgrades this year L to Stanford Avenue, long a treacherous trouble spot. The road, which intersects Juni- pero Serra Boulevard, is used by hikers who park their cars there be- fore climbing to the Stanford Dish. Although drivers are supposed to park off the pavement, many auto- mobiles end up at least partly in the bike lane. Rich Swent, chair of the Palo Alto Bicycle Advisory Commission, has been honked and shouted at for rid- ing in the center of the right lane, Norbert von der Groeben which he says is the only safe place to be. Even more dangerous: Cars speed and pass in the opposite lane, even when there’s oncoming traffic. “A lot of people can’t stand to be behind a bicyclist any length of time in a car, even if passing doesn’t gain them anything,” Swent said. A crow takes flight at Ramos Park on East Meadow Drive Wednesday evening. Residents have seen more of the large, noisy birds recently. The road, which Santa Clara County maintains, is full of potholes led some to wonder where they crows they take in are oversized and cracks, he added. Plus, prohib- PALO ALTO came from, and why. and rambunctious. ited U-turns are common. “They appear in flocks in these “They scream constantly,” she The bicycle commission is asking large redwoods,” said Phillip Cory, said, “even when you cover their for the issue to come before a joint Counting crows 17, pointing across the street from eyes” — a typical method for se- meeting with county officials, neigh- Residents take note of flocks of larger, his house on Emerson. “They’re dating the birds. bors and university representatives. large, and very noisy.” Some residents wonder if the The next meeting is in September. noisier birds in town Melanie Wilensky, who has crows are not crows at all, but in “I don’t think it’s going to get by Cyrus Hedayati lived in Palo Alto for 23 years, has fact ravens. solved anytime soon but we can also noticed the birds. Noppinger, however, said these make some improvements,” said orin Grunwald’s dog, Hap- “They’re like black sea gulls,” “They’ll perch on top of the red- crows may be the size of the larger Swent, who at minimum would like py, loves chasing birds. he said. woods as high as they can go,” she raven, but have the semi-circle tail better notification that bicyclists are S But since moving from Other residents of Midtown, said. “Usually they have an alpha- and narrow beaks unique to the allowed to share the road. “Things San Antonio Road to the Mid- Old Palo Alto and other Palo type perched on the top, and then crow. Ravens have a pointy tail haven’t gotten any better by ignor- town neighborhood a year ago, Alto neighborhoods say they’ve they’ll sort of talk to each other.” and wider beak. ing it.” Grunwald has noticed the crows seen — and heard — these larg- Liz Noppinger, animal-control In the summer, crows break Dan Collen, deputy director of Happy chases in Greer Park are er, louder and more numerous coordinator at Wildlife Rescue, into pairs to mate and create county roads and airports, said the larger than usual. crows. The sizeable flocks have has noticed a trend: Many of the (continued on page 5) county is open to exploring options (continued on page 5) Palo Alto Weekly • Friday, July 21, 2006 • Page 3 703 HIGH STREET, PALO ALTO, CA 94302 (650) 326-8210 More than an art store PUBLISHER William S. Johnson ReaderReaderWire comments via e-mail, voice mail and U.S. mail EDITORIAL Jay Thorwaldson, Editor Marc Burkhardt, Managing Editor Rat trap dealership space on El Camino Real Jocelyn Dong, Associate Editor in Menlo Park. It already has facilities Allen Clapp, Carol Blitzer, Assistant Editors I am writing to thank the anony- “The frame Keith Peters, Sports Editor mous City of Palo Alto dispatcher for repair and maintenance. Relocate Rick Eymer, Assistant Sports Editor Rebecca Wallace, Arts & Entertainment Editor who very calmly and gently handled the Municipal Services Center to this Don Kazak, Senior Staff Writer space and to the space by the Palo makes Alexandria Rocha, Staff Writer my distress call early Saturday morn- Norbert von der Groeben, Chief Photographer ing. Alto Airport. Nicholas Wright, Staff Photographer Adam Heyman, Photo Intern I had returned home shortly before Anything that can’t be squeezed the art.” Tyler Hanley, Assistant to the Editor & into these two spaces can be stored Online Editor 1 a.m. and found (to my horror) that Sue Dremann, Staff Writer, Special Sections a roof rat was trapped in the space at the lot at the end of San Antonio Cammie Farmer, Calendar Editor 267 Hamilton Avenue, Downtown Palo Alto Jeanne Aufmuth, Dale Bentson, between the sliding glass door and Road. Build the new auto mall on the Lynn Comeskey, Tim Goode, Jill Slater, current Municipal Services Center 650.328.3500 www.universityart.com Susan Tavernetti, Robert Taylor, Contributors the screen door of my bedroom. Anabel Lee, Andrew Thompson, Editorial Interns I am, unfortunately, familiar with and have the car dealers move in. Also in San Francisco, San Jose, Sacramento Brooke Thomas, Arts & Entertainment Intern the roof rats that roam the upper Then re-examine the real need for DESIGN space for the Municipal Services Cen- Carol Hubenthal, Design Director reaches of south Palo Alto. And I Diane Haas, Sue Peck, Senior Designers; know, from personal experience, that ter and what a cost-effective solution Royd Hatta, Dana James, Paul Llewellyn, there is a “deceased animal pickup” would be. Charmaine Mirsky, Scott Peterson, Designers service that will come retrieve the Marc Fleischmann PRODUCTION Wellsbury Way, Palo Alto Jennifer Lindberg, Production Manager carcasses that my cat occasionally Dorothy Hassett, Brooke Fox, leaves for me to find as I stumble to Sales & Production Coordinators my coffee maker in the morning.
Recommended publications
  • WTA Tour Statistical Abstract 1999
    WTA Tour Statistical Abstract 1999 Robert B. Waltz ©1999 by Robert B. Waltz and Tennis News Reproduction and/or distribution for profit prohibited Contents Introduction Head to Head — Results Winning Percentage on Hardcourts against Top Players Points Per Tournament on Hardcourts 1999 In Review: The Top Best and Worst Results on Hardcourts The Top 20 Head to Head Players Clay The Final Top Twenty-Five Wins Over Top Players Summary of Clay Results The Beginning Top Twenty Matches Played/Won against the (Final) Winning Percentage on Clay Summary of Changes, beginning to end Top Twenty Points Per Tournament on Clay of 1999 Won/Lost Versus the Top Players Best and Worst Results on Clay (Based on Rankings at the Time of All the Players in the Top Ten in Grass 1999 the Match) Won/Lost Versus the Top Players Summary of Grass Results The Complete Top Ten Based on WTA (Based on Final Rankings) (Best 18) Statistics Indoors The Complete Top Ten under the 1996 Statistics/Rankings Based on Summary of Indoor Results Ranking System Head-to-Head Numbers Winning Percentage Indoors Points Per Tournament Indoors Ranking Fluctuation Total Wins over Top Ten Players Best and Worst Results Indoors Top Players Sorted by Median Ranking Winning Percentage against Top Ten Players All-Surface Players Tournament Results Wins Against Top Ten Players Tournament Wins by Surface Tournaments Played/Summary of Analysed Results for Top Players Assorted Statistics Tournament Winners by Date (High- How They Earned Their Points Tier Events) Fraction of Points Earned in Slams
    [Show full text]
  • Lindsay Davenport (USA) 7-5 6-3 Winner’S Prize: Porsche 911 Carrera 4 Cabriolet Prize Money: 450,000 US Dollar
    History 1998 - 2007 1998 Final: Sandrine Testud (FRA) - Lindsay Davenport (USA) 7-5 6-3 Winner’s Prize: Porsche 911 Carrera 4 Cabriolet Prize Money: 450,000 US Dollar Host Dieter Fischer celebrated his 60th birthday. Much to his delight, Stefanie Graf entered the Grand Prix for the first time since 1985 but a hand injury thwarted her comeback in Filderstadt. Professor Ferdinand “Ferry” Porsche, the Grand Prix's great friend and sponsor, died. He last visited the event in 1996 when he handed over the prize - a Boxster - to the young Martina Hingis. His seat in the stand remained empty. 1999 Final: Martina Hingis (SUI) - Mary Pierce (FRA) 6-4 6-1 Winner’s Prize: Porsche Boxster S Prize Money: 500,000 US Dollar Sometimes it is not only spectacular tennis that thrills spectators. It happened in the first changeover of the final between Martina Hingis and Mary Pierce when the crowd applauded a fellow player sitting in the VIP box next to Porsche chairman Dr. Wendelin Wiedeking. A few weeks after retiring from tournament tennis, Stefanie Graf came to Filderstadt to watch the tournament. Martina Hingis raised her racket in the direction of her former rival as if to say, “Come down, do you want to play for me?” Stefanie Graf laughed and refused the offer. She had in the meantime established herself as a keen observer of the sport she had so dominated for over a decade. The final was over in no time at all. Martina Hingis seemed to be in a hurry to win her third Porsche at her sixth appearance at the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Women’S Tennis Association Media Guide
    2020 Women’s Tennis Association Media Guide © Copyright WTA 2020 All Rights Reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced - electronically, mechanically or by any other means, including photocopying- without the written permission of the Women’s Tennis Association (WTA). Compiled by the Women’s Tennis Association (WTA) Communications Department WTA CEO: Steve Simon Editor-in-Chief: Kevin Fischer Assistant Editors: Chase Altieri, Amy Binder, Jessica Culbreath, Ellie Emerson, Katie Gardner, Estelle LaPorte, Adam Lincoln, Alex Prior, Teyva Sammet, Catherine Sneddon, Bryan Shapiro, Chris Whitmore, Yanyan Xu Cover Design: Henrique Ruiz, Tim Smith, Michael Taylor, Allison Biggs Graphic Design: Provations Group, Nicholasville, KY, USA Contributors: Mike Anders, Danny Champagne, Evan Charles, Crystal Christian, Grace Dowling, Sophia Eden, Ellie Emerson,Kelly Frey, Anne Hartman, Jill Hausler, Pete Holtermann, Ashley Keber, Peachy Kellmeyer, Christopher Kronk, Courtney McBride, Courtney Nguyen, Joan Pennello, Neil Robinson, Kathleen Stroia Photography: Getty Images (AFP, Bongarts), Action Images, GEPA Pictures, Ron Angle, Michael Baz, Matt May, Pascal Ratthe, Art Seitz, Chris Smith, Red Photographic, adidas, WTA WTA Corporate Headquarters 100 Second Avenue South Suite 1100-S St. Petersburg, FL 33701 +1.727.895.5000 2 Table of Contents GENERAL INFORMATION Women’s Tennis Association Story . 4-5 WTA Organizational Structure . 6 Steve Simon - WTA CEO & Chairman . 7 WTA Executive Team & Senior Management . 8 WTA Media Information . 9 WTA Personnel . 10-11 WTA Player Development . 12-13 WTA Coach Initiatives . 14 CALENDAR & TOURNAMENTS 2020 WTA Calendar . 16-17 WTA Premier Mandatory Profiles . 18 WTA Premier 5 Profiles . 19 WTA Finals & WTA Elite Trophy . 20 WTA Premier Events . 22-23 WTA International Events .
    [Show full text]
  • Announcer Andy Taylor. 2021 Qatar Total Open Champions And
    MOST QATAR TOTAL OPEN TITLES MOST QATAR TOTAL OPEN FINALS 2 - Petra Kvitova (CZE) 3 - Petra Kvitova (CZE) 2 - Victoria Azarenka (BLR) 3 - Victoria Azarenka (BLR) 2 - Maria Sharapova (RUS) 2 - Simona Halep (ROU) 2 - Anastasia Myskina (RUS) 2 - Caroline Wozniacki (DEN) 2 - Vera Zvonareva (RUS) 2 - Maria Sharapova (RUS) 2 - Svetlana Kuznetsova (RUS) 2 - Anastasia Myskina (RUS) Qatar Total Open - Singles Champions and Finalists LEVEL YEAR CHAMPION Titles Finals FINALIST Titles Finals WTA 500 2021 Petra Kvitova (CZE) 2 3 Garbiñe Muguruza (ESP) 0 2 Premier 5 2020 Aryna Sabalenka (BLR) 1 1 Petra Kvitova (CZE) 1 2 Premier 2019 Elise Mertens (BEL) 1 1 Simona Halep (ROU) 1 2 Premier 5 2018 Petra Kvitova (CZE) 1 1 Garbiñe Muguruza (ESP) 0 1 Premier 2017 Karolina Pliskova (CZE) 1 1 Caroline Wozniacki (DEN) 0 2 Premier 5 2016 Carla Suarez Navarro (ESP) 1 1 Jelena Ostapenko (LAT) 1 1 Premier 2015 Lucie Safarova (CZE) 1 1 Victoria Azarenka (BLR) 2 3 Premier 5 2014 Simona Halep (ROU) 1 1 Angelique Kerber (GER) 0 1 Premier 5 2013 Victoria Azarenka (BLR) 2 2 Serena Williams (USA) 0 1 Premier 5 2012 Victoria Azarenka (BLR) 1 1 Sam Stosur (AUS) 0 1 Premier 2011 Vera Zvonareva (RUS) 1 2 Caroline Wozniacki (DEN) 0 1 WTA Finals 2010 Kim Clijsters (BEL) Caroline Wozniacki (DEN) WTA Finals 2009 Serena Williams (USA) Venus Williams (USA) WTA Finals 2008 Venus Williams (USA) Vera Zvonareva (RUS) Tier I 2008 Maria Sharapova (RUS) 2 2 Vera Zvonareva (RUS) 0 1 Tier II 2007 Justin Henin (BEL) 1 1 Svetlana Kuznetsova (RUS) 0 2 Tier II 2006 Nadia Petrova (RUS) 1 1 Amelie Mauresmo (FRA) 0 1 Tier II 2005 Maria Sharapova (RUS) 1 1 Alicia Molik (AUS) 0 1 Tier II 2004 Anastasia Myskina (RUS) 2 2 Svetlana Kuznetsova (RUS) 0 1 Tier III 2003 Anastasia Myskina (RUS) 1 1 Elena Likhovtseva (RUS) 0 1 Tier III 2002 Monica Seles (USA) 1 1 Tamarine Tanasugarn (THA) 0 1 Tier III 2001 Martina Hingis (SUI) 1 1 Sandrine Testud (FRA) 0 1 Doha hosted the WTA Finals | In 2009 and 2010, the Qatar Total Open was not held.
    [Show full text]
  • Roland Garros 2013
    Roland Garros 2013 Schedule for Day 13: Friday, 7 June 2013 Revised (Court Change) Court Philippe Chatrier 1:00 PM Start Time Court Suzanne Lenglen 11:00 AM Start Time 1. Men's Singles - Semifinals 1. Men's Legends Over 45 Novak Djokovic (SRB)[1] v. Rafael Nadal (ESP)[3] Mikael Pernfors (SWE) v. Mansour Bahrami (FRA) Mats Wilander (SWE) Pat Cash (AUS) 2. Men's Singles - Semifinals David Ferrer (ESP)[4] v. Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (FRA)[6] 2. Women's Legends Lindsay Davenport (USA) v. Nathalie Tauziat (FRA) Martina Hingis (SUI) Sandrine Testud (FRA) Not Before: 1:00 PM 3. Women's Doubles - Semifinals Ekaterina Makarova (RUS)[4] v. Andrea Hlavackova (CZE)[2] Elena Vesnina (RUS)[4] Lucie Hradecka (CZE)[2] Not Before: 3:00 PM 4. Women's Doubles - Semifinals Sara Errani (ITA)[1] v. Nadia Petrova (RUS)[3] Roberta Vinci (ITA)[1] Katarina Srebotnik (SLO)[3] Court 1 11:00 AM Start Time Court 2 11:00 AM Start Time 1. Men's Legends Over 45 1. Girls' Singles - Semifinals Peter McNamara (AUS) v. Andres Gomez (ECU) Louisa Chirico (USA) v. Belinda Bencic (SUI)[2] Michael Stich (GER) Mark Woodforde (AUS) 2. Boys' Singles - Semifinals Not Before: 4:00 PM Alexander Zverev (GER)[4] v. Nikola Milojevic (SRB)[2] 2. Women's Legends 3. Boys' Doubles - Semifinals Mary Joe Fernandez (USA) v. Iva Majoli (CRO) Benjamin Bonzi (FRA) v. Kyle Edmund (GBR)[3] Arantxa Sanchez (ESP) Conchita Martinez (ESP) Quentin Halys (FRA) Frederico Ferreira Silva (POR)[3] 4. Boys' Doubles - Semifinals Christian Garin (CHI)[5] v. Maximilian Marterer (GER) Nicolas Jarry (CHI)[5] Lucas Miedler (AUT) Court 3 11:00 AM Start Time Court 7 11:00 AM Start Time 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Molestosporlasuperficieelegida”
    Mundo Deportivo Martes 30 de enero de 2001 TENIS Copa Davis POLIDEPORTIVO 29 Ránkings ATP TOUR LISTA DE ENTRADAS 1. Marat Safin (Rus) 4.265 ptos. 2. Gustavo Kuerten (Bra) 4.225 3. Pete Sampras (USA) 3.085 4. Andre Agassi (USA) 2.765 5. Magnus Norman (Sue) 2.485 6. Lleyton Hewitt (Aus) 2.485 7. Yevgeny Kafelnikov (Rus) 2.485 8. Àlex Corretja (Esp) 2.415 9. Thomas Enqvist (Sue) 2.145 10. Tim Henman (GBR) 2.020 13. Juan Carlos Ferrero (Esp) 1.800 25. Albert Costa (Esp) 1.110 26. Carlos Moyà (Esp) 1.080 42. Francisco Clavet (Esp) 860 46. Álex Calatrava (Esp) 831 51. Fernando Vicente (Esp) 790 54. Albert Portas (Esp) 730 73. Joan Balcells (Esp) 556 74. 'Beto' Martín (Esp) 548 80. Sergi Bruguera (Esp) 504 81. David Sánchez (Esp) 499 91. Germán Puentes (Esp) 448 CARRERA DE CAMPEONES 1. Andre Agassi (USA) 200 2. Arnaud Clément (Fra) 146 3. Sebastien Grosjean (Fra) 106 4. Patrick Rafter (Aus) 90 5. Dominik Hrbaty (Evq) 85 6. Yevgeny Kafelnikov (Rus) 62 7. Lleyton Hewitt (Aus) 58 8. Magnus Norman (Sue) 55 9. Marcelo Ríos (Chi) 52 10. Carlos Moyà (Esp) 51 20. Francisco Clavet (Esp) 32 29. Álex Calatrava (Esp) 23 32. Tommy Robredo (Esp) 19 40. Joan Balcells (Esp) 16 48. 'Beto' Martín (Esp) 15 52. Fernando Vicente (Esp) 14 WTA TOUR 1. Martina Hingis (Sui) 6.258 2. Lindsay Davenport 4.468 3. Venus Williams (USA) 4.094 4. Monica Seles (USA) 3.521 5. Serena Williams (USA) 2.474 6. Conchita Martínez (Esp) 2.404 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Winners Since 1978
    History The Winners since 1978 Singles Year Winner Runner-up Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 2017 Laura Kristina 6-1 2-6 7-6 Siegemund Mladenovic 2016 Angelique Laura 6-4 6-0 Kerber Siegemund 2015 Angelique Caroline 3-6 6-1 7-5 Kerber Wozniacki 2014 Maria Ana Ivanovic 3-6 6-4 6-1 Sharapova 2013 Maria Li Na 6-4 6-3 Sharapova 2012 Maria Victoria 6-1 6-4 Sharapova Azarenka 2011 Julia Görges Caroline 7-6 6-3 Wozniacki 2010 Justine Henin Samantha Stosur6-4 2-6 2009 Svetlana Dinara Safina 6-4 6-3 Kuznetsova 2008 Jelena Jankovic Nadia Petrova 6-4 6-3 2007 Justine Henin Tatiana Golovin 2-6 6-2 6-1 2006 Nadia Petrova Tatiana Golovin 6-3 7-6 2005 Lindsay Amélie 6-2 6-4 Davenport Mauresmo 2004 Lindsay Amélie 6-2 ret. Davenport Mauresmo 2003 Kim Clijsters Justin Henin- 5-7 6-4 6-2 Hardenne 2002 Kim Clijsters Daniela 4-6 6-3 6-4 Hantuchova 2001 Lindsay Justine Henin 7-5 6-4 Davenport 2000 Martina Hingis Kim Clijsters 6-0 6-3 1999 Martina Hingis Mary Pierce 6-4 6-1 1998 Sandrine Testud Lindsay 7-5 6-4 Davenport 1997 Martina Hingis Lisa Raymond 6-4 6-2 1996 Martina Hingis Anke Huber 6-2 3-6 6-3 1995 Iva Majoli Gabriela 6-4 7-6 Sabatini 1994 Anke Huber Mary Pierce 6-4 6-2 1993 Mary Pierce Natasha Zvereva6-3 6-3 1992 Martina Gabriela 7-6 6-3 Navratilova Sabatini Year Winner Runner-up Set 1 Set 2 Set 3 1991 Anke Huber Martina 2-6 6-2 7-6 Navratilova 1990 Mary Joe Barbara Paulus 6-1 6-3 Fernandez 1989 Gabriela Mary Joe 7-6 6-4 Sabatini Fernandez 1988 Martina Chris Evert-Mill6-2 6-3 Navratilova 1987 Martina Chris Evert 7-5 6-1 Navratilova 1986 Martina Hana 6-2 6-3 Navratilova
    [Show full text]
  • WTA Tour Statistical Abstract 2002
    WTA Tour Statistical Abstract 2002 Robert B. Waltz ©2002 by Robert B. Waltz Reproduction and/or distribution for profit prohibited Contents Introduction. .4 Idealized Ranking Systems . .66 Surface-Modified Divisor (Minimum 16)......................66 2002 In Review: The Top Players . .5 Idealized Rankings/Proposal 2 — Adjusted Won/Lost..68 The Final Top Thirty.........................................................5 Adjusted Winning Percentage, No Bonuses...................70 The Beginning Top Twenty-Five .................................... 6 Percentage of Possible Points Earned ............................71 Summary of Changes, Beginning to End of 2002 ............6 Head to Head . 73 Top Players Analysed . .7 All the Players in the Top Ten in 2002: The Complete The Top 20 Head to Head . .73 Top Ten Based on WTA (Best 17) Statistics ...............7 Wins Over Top Players . .74 The Complete Top Ten under the 1996 Ranking System.7 Matches Played/Won against the (Final) Top Twenty...74 Ranking Fluctuation. .8 Won/Lost Versus the Top Players Highest Ranking of 2002 ................................................10 (Based on Rankings at the Time of the Match) .........75 Top Players Sorted by Median Ranking.........................11 Won/Lost Versus the Top Players Short Summary: The Top Eighty. .12 (Based on Final Rankings).........................................76 The Top 200, in Numerical Order ..................................14 Statistics/Rankings Based on Head-to-Head . .77 The Top 200, in Alphabetical Order...............................15
    [Show full text]
  • The Championships 1997 Ladies' Doubles Winners: Miss G
    The Championships 1997 Ladies' Doubles Winners: Miss G. Fernandez & Miss N. Zvereva 7/6(4) 6/4 First Round Second Round Third Round Quarter-Finals Semi-Finals Final 1. Miss Gigi Fernandez (USA) & Miss Natasha Zvereva (BLR) Miss G. Fernandez & Miss N. Zvereva Miss G. Fernandez & (WC) 2. Miss Olga Barabanschikova (BLR) & Miss Samantha Smith (GBR) ................................................6/2 6/2 Miss N. Zvereva 3. Miss Kirstin Freye (GER) & Miss Seda Noorlander (NED) Miss K. Freye & Miss S. Noorlander ...............................6/0 6/2 Miss G. Fernandez & 4. Mrs Patricia Hy-Boulais (CAN) & Miss Katarina Studenikova (SVK) ......................................7/6(5) 4/6 6/2 Miss N. Zvereva 5. Miss Catherine Barclay (AUS) & Miss Clare Wood (GBR) Miss C.G. Barclay & Miss C.J. Wood ...............................7/5 7/5 Miss C.G. Barclay & 6. Miss Silvia Farina (ITA) & Miss Barbara Schett (AUT) ................................................6/4 6/3 Miss C.J. Wood (WC) 7. Miss Julie Pullin (GBR) & Miss Lorna Woodroffe (GBR) Miss K. Boogert & Miss I. Spirlea .....................4/6 7/6(5) 6/4 8. Miss Kristie Boogert (NED) & Miss Irina Spirlea (ROM) ................................................6/3 6/2 9. Miss Katrina Adams (USA) & Miss Lori McNeil (USA) Miss K.M. Adams & Miss L.M. McNeil Miss K.M. Adams & 5/7 6/4 10. Miss Virginia Ruano Pascual (ESP) & Miss Paola Suarez (ARG) ............................................7/6(3) 6/3 Miss L.M. McNeil 11. Miss Barbara Rittner (GER) & Mrs Dominique Van Roost (BEL) Miss B. Rittner & Mrs D. Van Roost .........................6/3 1/6 6/4 Miss MJ Fernandez & 12. Miss Annabel Ellwood (AUS) & Miss Rachel McQuillan (AUS) ..........................................4/6 6/1 6/1 Miss L.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Negative Examples in Set-Expansion
    Learning from Negative Examples in Set-Expansion Prateek Jindal Dan Roth Dept. of Computer Science Dept. of Computer Science UIUC UIUC Urbana, IL, USA Urbana, IL, USA [email protected] [email protected] FEMALE TENNIS PLAYERS Abstract—This paper addresses the task of set-expansion State-of-the-art This Paper on free text. Set-expansion has been viewed as a problem of generating an extensive list of instances of a concept of Monica Seles Mary Pierce Steffi Graf Monica Seles interest, given a few examples of the concept as input. Our key Martina Hingis Martina Hingis contribution is that we show that the concept definition can be Mary Pierce Lindsay Davenport significantly improved by specifying some negative examples Lindsay Davenport Steffi Graf in the input, along with the positive examples. The state-of-the Jennifer Capriati Jennifer Capriati art centroid-based approach to set-expansion doesn’t readily Kim Clijsters Kim Clijsters admit the negative examples. We develop an inference-based Mary Joe Fernandez Karina Habsudova approach to set-expansion which naturally allows for negative Nathalie Tauziat Sandrine Testud examples and show that it performs significantly better than a Kimiko Date Kimiko Date strong baseline. Conchita Martinez Chanda Rubin Anke Huber Anke Huber Judith Wiesner Nathalie Tauziat Andre Agassi Jana Novotna I. INTRODUCTION Pete Sampras Conchita Martinez This paper addresses the task of set-expansion on free text. Jana Novotna Nathalie Dechy Karina Habsudova Amanda Coetzer Set-expansion has been viewed as a problem of generating Jim Courier Barbara Paulus an extensive list of instances of a concept of interest, given Justine Henin Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario a few examples of the concept as input.
    [Show full text]
  • WTA Tour Statistical Abstract 2000
    WTA Tour Statistical Abstract 2000 Robert B. Waltz ©2000 by Robert B. Waltz Reproduction and/or distribution for profit prohibited Contents 2000 In Review: Top Players 5 Wins Over Top Players 57 Tournament Wins by Surface 98 The Final Top Twenty-Five 5 Matches Played/Won against the (Final) Assorted Statistics 99 The Beginning Top Twenty-Five 6 Top Twenty 57 Summary of Changes 2000 6 Won/Lost Versus the Top Players (Based on The Busiest Players on the Tour 99 Rankings at the Time of the Match) 58 Total Matches Played by Top Players 99 All the Players in the Top Ten in 2000 7 Total Events Played by the Top 150 100 The Complete Top Ten Based on WTA Won/Lost Versus the Top Players (Based on (Best 18) Statistics 7 Final Rankings) 59 The Biggest Tournaments 101 The Complete Top Ten under the 1996 Statistics/Rankings Based on Head-to- Tournament Strength Based on the Four Top Ranking System 7 Head Numbers 60 Players Present 102 Ranking Fluctuation 8 Total Wins over Top Ten Players 60 The Top Tournaments Based on Top Players Top Players Sorted by Median Ranking 9 Winning Percentage against Top Ten Present — Method 1 103 Players 60 The Top Tournaments Based on Top Players Tournament Results 10 Present — Method 2 104 Tournaments Played/Summary of Results How They Earned Their Points 61 Strongest Tournaments Won 105 for Top Players 10 Fraction of Points Earned in Slams 61 Strongest Tournament Performances The Rankings (Top 192 — As of November Quality Versus Round Points 62 106 20, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Prize Top 100 Money YTD SD.Txt
    Prize Top 100 Money YTD S-D.txt WTA TOUR PRIZE MONEY YTD 1 MARTINA HINGIS 2,936,425 355,355 3,291,780 2 LINDSAY DAVENPORT 2,426,756 303,660 2,734,205 3 SERENA WILLIAMS 2,270,946 317,540 2,605,102 4 VENUS WILLIAMS 1,990,887 317,540 2,316,005 5 STEFFI GRAF 1,219,289 13,097 1,248,867 6 MARY PIERCE 857,078 129,465 996,442 7 NATHALIE TAUZIAT 723,648 140,859 864,507 8 MONICA SELES 744,741 77,477 822,218 9 ARANTXA SANCHEZ-VICARIO 617,433 190,488 807,921 10 ANNA KOURNIKOVA 389,325 325,205 748,424 11 JANA NOVOTNA 524,662 216,792 741,454 12 BARBARA SCHETT 633,068 92,617 725,685 13 AMELIE MAURESMO 551,825 30,643 582,468 14 ELENA LIKHOVTSEVA 336,719 156,567 525,307 15 JULIE HALARD-DECUGIS 457,930 56,140 514,070 16 SANDRINE TESTUD 359,847 123,155 488,496 17 CONCHITA MARTINEZ 394,876 91,516 486,392 18 AMANDA COETZER 425,814 58,525 486,120 19 LISA RAYMOND 207,110 179,550 465,664 20 DOMINIQUE VAN ROOST 394,995 52,967 450,401 21 NATASHA ZVEREVA 267,917 170,660 438,577 22 CORINA MORARIU 161,771 242,256 413,980 23 ANKE HUBER 361,439 50,548 411,987 24 AI SUGIYAMA 226,719 105,967 405,148 25 CHANDA RUBIN 229,078 126,643 355,721 26 PATTY SCHNYDER 277,567 59,030 336,597 27 LARISA NEILAND 57,096 231,563 324,300 28 RUXANDRA DRAGOMIR 261,606 47,616 309,222 29 IRINA SPIRLEA 190,680 102,963 299,143 30 MIRJANA LUCIC 271,801 12,535 286,259 31 MARY JOE FERNANDEZ 168,557 95,043 263,600 32 MARIAAN DE SWARDT 107,991 113,525 263,287 33 SILVIA FARINA 186,691 71,457 258,148 34 AMY FRAZIER 221,647 36,039 257,686 35 ANNE-GAELLE SIDOT 175,877 66,731 246,939 36 JENNIFER CAPRIATI
    [Show full text]