Chapter 8 – Consultation Process

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 8 – Consultation Process Chapter 8 – Consultation Process 407 TRANSITWAY – WEST OF BRANT STREET TO WEST OF HURONTARIO STREET MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION TABLE OF CONTENTS 8. CONSULTATION PROCESS 8-1 8.1. Overview 8-1 8.2. Consultation with Agencies 8-1 8.2.1. Agency Consultation Meeting 8-2 8.2.2. Technical Advisory/Resource Group (TRG) 8-38 8.3. Consultation with Indigenous Communities 8-100 8.4. Consultation with the Public and Landowners 8-105 8.4.1. Public Notification 8-105 8.4.2. Notification to Landowners in Close Vicinity of the Transitway 8-105 8.4.3. Public Information Centre #1 (PIC #1) 8-106 8.4.4. Public Information Centre #2 (PIC #2) 8-107 8-0 8. CONSULTATION PROCESS 8.2. Consultation with Agencies Notification and consultation were carried out to encourage the involvement of government review 8.1. Overview agencies, technical agencies (i.e. transit authorities, utility companies, emergency medical services (EMS), etc.), municipal staff and elected officials throughout the stages of this study. Agencies were Consultation is an integral component of the Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) and essential invited to participate in the PICs and focused meetings to address specific concerns and technical to the successful completion of this study. Consultation was undertaken throughout the study to assist requirements. in the planning and impact assessment process for the 407 Transitway. The consultation process was designed to meet the requirements of Ontario Regulation 231/08, Transit Projects and Metrolinx Agencies were notified of the Pre-TPAP study commencement by the distribution of an initial contact Undertakings. Consultation was initiated in May 2017, well before the formal declaration of the TPAP, letter mailed in May 2017. A few agencies responded that after reviewing of the study, there were no through the mailing of initial contact letters to stakeholders and lndigenous Communities, and the concerns and/or interests within the study area, and they requested to be removed from the contact list. initiation of the project website. The TPAP 120-day consultation and documentation period for this The first round of letters included the study limits to Winston Churchill, then as part of PIC # 1, the project began on April 16, 2020 and ended on August 13, 2020. Ministry of Transportation (MTO) expanded the study area limits to Hurontario Street in the City of Mississauga. Consultation was conducted with government review agencies, technical agencies, local municipalities, elected officials, the general public, landowners and Indigenous Communities. Agencies were invited to attend the two rounds of PIC #1 held on November 28, 2020 and November 29, 2018. Additionally, a second PIC was held on February 11, 2020 and February 13, 2020. PIC The consultation process included the following types of consultation activities: invitation letters were mailed on November 16, 2018, for PIC# 1 and January 20, 2020, for PIC# 2, . Public notices; respectively. Liaison with relevant agencies, members of the public and landowners (residents were notified The Draft EPR was made available to members of the Technical Resource Group (TRG) on December 10, beyond the required 30 m of the project limits); 2019, for review and comment. A letter was mailed to advise agencies of the formal Notice of . Liaison with Indigenous Communities; Commencement of TPAP 120-day consultation and documentation period on March 26, 2020 and March . Public Information Centres (PICs); and, 27,2020. The formal 120-day consultation and documentation TPAP period began on April 16, 2020. A . Project website. letter of notification was provided to inform agencies of the Notice of Completion of Environmental At the outset of the study (during the Pre-TPAP phase), the project team developed a detailed Project Report (EPR) concurrently documenting the results of the TPAP on July 23, 2020 with the release Consultation Plan. The purpose of the plan was to identify the proposed frequency and timing of of this EPR. Agencies were advised that the EPR was made available electronically for a 30-day review consultation activities, methods of notification, and key stakeholders. The plan included details regarding period starting August 13, 2020. Agencies were encouraged to review the EPR and provide comments the following consultation activities: by September 11, 2020. Public notices; The following is a list of agencies that were invited to participate in the consultation process: . Consultation/negotiation with external agencies, lndigenous Communities, and property owners . MPs; . Infrastructure Ontario/Ministry of Economic and the public, . MPPs; Development, Job Creation and Trade; . PICs; . Canadian Transportation Agency; . Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; . Presentations to municipalities; . Transport Canada (Ontario Region) and Rail Safety Office; . Conservation Halton; . Technical Advisory/Resource Group (TRG) and Steering Committee; . Canadian National Railway; . Credit Valley Conservation; . Project website; and, . Canadian Pacific Railway; . Halton Region; . Submission of the Environmental Project Report (EPR). Health Canada; . City of Burlington; The Consultation Plan also included preliminary letters to external agencies and lndigenous Communities . Fisheries and Oceans Canada; . Town of Oakville; . as well as a preliminary external agency mailing list, which was updated regularly throughout the project. Metrolinx; Town of Milton; . The plan also included initial contact letters that were sent to lndigenous Communities. Niagara Escarpment Commission; Town of Halton Hills; 8-1 . Ministry of Indigenous Affairs; . Peel Region; Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries. Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and . City of Mississauga; The main topics discussed in the meetings are summarized in Table 8.1. Culture Industries; . City of Brampton; . Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing; . Halton Regional Police Service; A Technical Advisory/Resource Group (TRG) was formed to provide technical expertise and strategic . Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural . Halton Region Paramedic Services; input to the project team during the project. In Section 8.2.2, Table 8.2 and Table 8.3 cover the Affairs; . Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; comments received from TRG members after TRG meeting 1 and TRG meeting 2. Peel Regional Police; . Highway 407 ETR Consortium/407 ETR . Peel Regional Paramedic Services; Concession Company Limited; . City of Brampton Fire; . Mississauga Rapid Transit (MiWay); . City of Mississauga Fire; . Brampton Transit; . Ontario Provincial Police; . Hydro One Networks Inc.; . Enbridge Inc.; Conseil scolaire Viamonde; . Conseil scolaire de district catholique . Rogers Cable; Centre-Sud; . Bell Canada/Telecon; . Halton Catholic District School Board; . Ariva Inc; . Halton District School Board; . Nature Conservancy of Canada; and . Peel Region District School Board; . Ontario Federation of Agriculture (as of . Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board; December 2019). Agency communications were undertaken as required to identify and resolve any environmental or design issues associated with the project. Consultation consisted of discussions, meetings, correspondence and/or presentations to external committees, government review agencies/ministries, technical agencies, local municipalities, elected officials, and interest groups. Environmental approvals- in-principle were requested in writing from external agencies, where required. Table 8.1 presents a summary of agency correspondence/meetings held during the TPAP. The original correspondences received from agencies is presented in Appendix A. 8.2.1. Agency Consultation Meeting The project team had a total of six agency consultation meetings: . On August 15, 2017, the project team had a meeting with Conservation Halton, the City of Mississauga, Infrastructure Ontario (IO) and the Region of Peel. On February 28, 2019, the project team had a meeting with Halton Region, the City of Burlington, the Town of Milton, the Town of Oakville and the Town of Halton Hills. On May 23, 2019, the project team had a meeting with 407 ETR. On March 20, 2020, the project team had a teleconference meeting with Peel Region. On April 22, 2020, the project team had a teleconference meeting with Hydro One. On May 19, 2020, the project team has a teleconference meeting with the Ministry of Heritage, 8-2 TABLE 8.1: SUMMARY OF CONTACTS WITH EXTERNAL AGENCIES/STAKEHOLDERS DURING TPAP AGENCY DATE CONTACTED COMMENTS/CONCERNS ACTION TAKEN M.P.s M.P. Burlington Initial contact letters sent on No comments/concerns received. No issues or concerns identified. May 25, 2017. M.P. Oakville North- All M.P.s were kept informed throughout the study. Burlington PIC #1 invitation letters sent on November 16, 2018. M.P. Wellington – Halton Hills PIC #2 invitation letters sent on January 20, 2020. M.P. Milton TPAP commencement M.P. Mississauga – notification letters sent on Streetsville March 27, 2020. M.P. Mississauga-Erin EPR completion notification Mills letters sent on July 23, 2020. M.P. Mississauga – Malton M.P. Brampton South M.P.P.s M.P.P. Burlington Initial contact letters sent on No comments/concerns received. No issues or concerns identified. May 25, 2017. M.P.P. Oakville North- All M.P.P.s were kept informed throughout the study. Burlington PIC #1 invitation letters sent on November 16, 2018. M.P.P. Wellington – Halton Hills PIC #2 invitation letters sent on January 20, 2020. M.P.P. Milton TPAP commencement
Recommended publications
  • General Government Committee Agenda
    Final General Government Committee Agenda Date: November 7, 2016 Time: 9:30 AM Place: Council Chambers, 2nd Floor Municipal Administrative Centre 40 Temperance Street Bowmanville, Ontario Inquiries & Accommodations: For inquiries about this agenda, or to make arrangements for accessibility accommodations for persons attending, please contact: Michelle Chambers, Committee Coordinator, at 905-623-3379, ext. 2106 or by email at [email protected]. Alternate Format: If this information is required in an alternate format, please contact the Accessibility Coordinator, at 905-623-3379 ext. 2131. Audio Record: The Municipality of Clarington makes an audio record of General Government Committee meetings. If you make a delegation or presentation at a General Government Committee meeting, the Municipality will be audio recording you and will make the recording public by publishing the recording on the Municipality’s website. Noon Recess: Please be advised that, as per the Municipality of Clarington’s Procedural By-law, this meeting will recess at 12:00 noon, for a one hour lunch break, unless otherwise determined by the Committee. Cell Phones: Please ensure all cell phones, mobile and other electronic devices are turned off or placed on non-audible mode during the meeting. Copies of Reports are available at www.clarington.net General Government Committee Agenda Date: November 7, 2016 Time: 9:30 AM Place: Council Chambers 1 Call to Order 2 New Business – Introduction 3 Adopt the Agenda 4 Declaration of Interest 5 Announcements 6 Adoption of
    [Show full text]
  • City of Mississauga Bylaw Jobs
    City Of Mississauga Bylaw Jobs Which Petr handsels so provably that Cooper cricket her exchequers? Georges dogmatize nimbly as Rowlandsozzled Worthington trouping her evens contractedness? her sonorant jeers ill-naturedly. Which Jerry unclenches so regally that A qualified individual with a disability or question other characteristic protected by law. Some 500 jobs out between a workforce of roughly 4500 people party headquarters city Seattle. A woman checks out a jobs advertisement sign together the COVID-19. Job Description Using knowledge of the music industry in City bylaws policies and processes finds a balance between supporting the needs of coverage local. Hoping you city of jobs largely unwilling to safety in? Top 12 Municipal By particular Officer Jobs in Mississauga Ontario. Says but who a countryside of guidance is everything said Toronto employment lawyer Nadia Zaman. We reserve the successful candidate profile with various types of all stages of territory targets and weekend. Ratings reflect our jobs. City of Markham. With a 20-pound load the beltess pack did kidnap 'me sick but after 10 or 15 miles. Compliance and enforcement of municipal by-laws field other. Important Notice The misery of Toronto recently launched a new girl board are on different button themselves to view and fetch for surf City of Toronto job opportunities. Organized alphabetically by city of jobs for passing a url without! Ken Leendertse director of licensing and bylaw services with true city. Peel Regional Police provide policing within century city of Mississauga and airport. Jobs at GE GE Building my World That Works. Only what makes the rumours were among other responsibilities include teaching and city mississauga bylaw enforcement officers we have.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications (Annual Reports, Brochures)
    Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Tribunal d’appel de l’aménagement local ISSUE DATE: January 29, 2020 CASE NO(S).: MM180055 The Ontario Municipal Board (the “OMB”) is continued under the name Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (the “Tribunal”), and any reference to the Ontario Municipal Board or Board in any publication of the Tribunal is deemed to be a reference to the Tribunal. PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 41(4) of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.18, as amended Appellant Sunder Group of Companies Ltd. Subject: By-law 0109-2018– Old Port Credit Village Conservation District Municipality: City of Mississauga LPAT Case No.: MM180055 LPAT File No.: MM180055 LAPT Case name Sunder Group of Companies Ltd v. Mississauga (City) Heard: December 5, 2019 in Mississauga, Ontario APPEARANCES: Parties Counsel Sunder Group of Companies Ltd. M. Winch City of Mississauga M. Minkowski MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY HUGH S. WILKINS AND D. CHIPMAN ON DECEMBER 5, 2019 AND ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL [1] On June 6, 2018, the City of Mississauga (“City”) Council passed By-law No. 0109-2018 (“Heritage Conservation District Plan”) under s. 41(1) and 41.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act (“Heritage Act”). It amends the 2004 Old Port Credit Village Heritage 2 MM180055 Conservation District Plan (“2004 Plan”). [2] The Sunder Group of Companies Ltd. (“Appellant”) owns property at 35 Front Street South (“Appellant’s property”). It lies within the boundaries of the Heritage Conservation District (“District”) which is subject to the Heritage Conservation District Plan. [3] On July 16, 2018, the Appellant appealed the passage of the Heritage Conservation District Plan to the Tribunal under s.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississauga Transitway Ambitious Design
    2 DRIVING TECHNOLOGY Durham innovates REVAMPED TARGETS 3 Amendments proposed WEDNESDAY, GREATER TORONTO JANUARY 23, 2019 Vol. 22 & HAMILTON AREA No. 4 URBAN DESIGN & PLACEMAKING REVITALIZING HAMILTON Rachael Williams s the City of Hamilton “I see a very strong will come,” said Torne. efective economic development prepares for signifcant connection between getting With the success of Art tool,” said placemaking, public A redevelopment along the the public realm right and Crawl, the community saw art and projects manager Ken waterfront, LRT corridor and promoting development and an opportunity to organize a Coit. in the downtown, the planning city-building, especially in a lot four-day music festival along Inspired by the success of and economic development of our older commercial areas James Street, where artists, James Street North, Coit told department is pulling together where we want to drive a lot of chefs, photographers and other NRU the new staf team will a staf team that will put a activity of pedestrians and foot vendors could showcase their attempt to follow a similar much-needed emphasis on trafc,” said Torne. creations. Te festival, known formula, looking at how to placemaking and public realm. Te synergy between art, as Super Crawl, attracts 200,000 repopulate under-utilized areas Led by Hamilton’s planning placemaking and economic visitors annually and results throughout the city through and economic development development has been playing in an economic impact of the use of public art and urban general manager Jason Torne, out in Hamilton over the past $16.9-million. design. the city is creating a new two decades, particularly along “It was a community driven One area that the city section within the tourism and James Street North.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of the City of Mississauga's 2020 Workforce
    REVISED General Committee Date: May 12, 2021 Time: 9:30 AM Location: Online Video Conference Members Mayor Bonnie Crombie Councillor Stephen Dasko Ward 1 Councillor Karen Ras Ward 2 Councillor Chris Fonseca Ward 3 Councillor John Kovac Ward 4 Councillor Carolyn Parrish Ward 5 (CHAIR) Councillor Ron Starr Ward 6 Councillor Dipika Damerla Ward 7 Councillor Matt Mahoney Ward 8 Councillor Pat Saito Ward 9 Councillor Sue McFadden Ward 10 Councillor George Carlson Ward 11 Participate Virtually and/or via Telephone Advance registration is required to participate and/or make a comment in the virtual meeting. Questions for Public Question Period are required to be provided to Clerk’s staff at least 24 hours in an advance of the meeting. Any materials you wish to show the Committee during your presentation must be provided as an attachment to the email. Links to cloud services will not be accepted. Comments submitted will be considered as public information and entered into public record. To register, please email [email protected] and for Residents without access to the internet via computer, smartphone or tablet, can register by calling Dayna Obaseki at 905-615-3200 ext. 5425 no later than Monday, May 10, 2021 before 4:00PM. You will be provided with directions on how to participate from Clerks' staff. Contact Dayna Obaseki, Legislative Coordinator, Legislative Services 905-615-3200 ext. 5425 Email: [email protected] Find it Online http://www.mississauga.ca/portal/cityhall/generalcommittee Meetings of Council streamed live and archived at Mississauga.ca/videos General Committee - 2021 05 12 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority to Waive the City's Right to a Hearing of Necessity in Connection
    12.12 Date: July 16, 2020 Originator’s files: To: Chair and Members of Council From: Geoff Wright, P.Eng, MBA, Commissioner of Meeting date: Transportation and Works July 22, 2020 Subject Authority to Waive the City’s Right to a Hearing of Necessity in Connection with Metrolinx’s Expropriation of City Interests in Land for the Purpose of the Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Project (Ward 5) Recommendations 1. That the Corporate Report titled “Authority to Waive the City’s Right to a Hearing of Necessity in Connection with Metrolinx’s Expropriation of City Interests in Land for the Purpose of the Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Project (Ward 5)” dated July 16, 2020 from the Commissioner of Transportation and Works, be received. 2. That the Legal Services Section of the City Manager’s Office be given authority to waive the City’s right to a Hearing of Necessity as provided pursuant to Section 6 (2) of the Expropriations Act, RSO. Background Under cover of letters dated April 21, 2020, the City of Mississauga received four (4) Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate (the “Notices”) from Metrolinx for the following interests in property required in connection with Metrolinx’s Eglinton Crosstown West Extension Project: 1. City’s easement interest in PIN132970628 2. City’s easement interest in PIN132970627 3. Fee simple interest in the City-owned lands identified as PIN74240245 4. Fee simple interest in the City-owned lands identified as PIN132970624. The location of these properties is illustrated in Appendix 1. 12.12 Council
    [Show full text]
  • Mississauga Office Strategy Study Has Been Prepared for the City of Mississauga
    The Vision for Clarkson Village Submitted to: City of Mississauga FPeerINAL REPORT Revi ew April 24, 2008 Prepared by: Canadian Urban Institute 555 Richmond St. W., Suite 402 PO Box 612 Toronto ON M5V 3B1 Canada 416‐365‐0816 416‐365‐0650 [email protected] www.canurb.com CM–OSSITY OF ISSISSAUGA FFICE TRATEGY TUDY i Mississauga Office Strategy Research Team Canadian Urban Institute Glenn R. Miller, Director (Education & Research), FCIP, RPP Brent Gilmour, M.Sc.Pl. Ita Waghray, M.U.P. Iain D. C. Myrans, B.A.(Hons.), B.U.R.Pl. Daryl J. W. Keleher, B.A. (Hons.), B.U.R.Pl. Real Estate Search Corporation Iain Dobson, Principal Harris Consulting Inc. Gordon Harris, MCIP, Principal Jonathan Tinney, M.A. Ian A. R. Graham Planning Consultant Ltd. Ian A. R. Graham, MCIP, RPP, AICP Beate Bowron Etcetera Beate Bowron, FCIP, RPP Hammersmith Communications Philippa Campsie, Principal David P. Amborski, MCIP, RPP The Mississauga Office Strategy Study has been prepared for the City of Mississauga ii CANADIAN URBAN INSTITUTE TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | The Mississauga Office Strategy Study ................................................................................................................ iv INTRODUCTION | THE MISSISSAUGA OFFICE STRATEGY STUDY: MISSISSAUGA HAS A WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY TO TRANSFORM THE OFFICE MARKETPLACE ......... 1 CHAPTER ONE | THE MARKET CONTEXT FOR OFFICE DEVELOPMENT IN THE GTA ......................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Mississauga is the dominant
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix III: Provisional Scenario 10
    APPENDIX III: PROVISIONAL SCENARIO 10 - TOTAL POPULATION BY MUNICIPALITY AND PLANNING COMMUNITY AREA 2016-2031 2016-2041 2031-2041 Municipality/Community Planning Area Map Label 2016 2021 2031 2036 2041 Growth Growth Growth Peel 1,433,000 1,538,600 1,770,060 1,869,990 1,970,040 337,060 537,040 199,980 B R A M P T O N Brampton 611,480 687,150 816,020 855,220 889,980 204,540 278,500 73,960 Snelgrove B1 12,060 12,650 13,550 13,970 14,300 1,490 2,240 750 Westgate B10 14,110 14,100 14,130 14,230 14,370 20 260 240 Central Park B11 16,030 15,910 15,840 15,960 16,110 -190 80 270 Northgate B12 16,330 16,230 16,180 16,300 16,460 -150 130 280 Bramalea North Industrial B13 2,810 2,780 2,770 2,790 2,810 -40 0 40 Gore Industrial North B14 2,910 3,090 3,440 3,660 3,820 530 910 380 Fletchers West B15 19,420 20,010 20,790 21,220 21,600 1,370 2,180 810 Brampton South B16 13,870 13,770 13,730 13,840 13,960 -140 90 230 Brampton East B17 9,760 9,730 9,760 9,850 9,950 0 190 190 Brampton East Industrial B18 20 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 Bramalea West Industrial B19 1,210 1,200 1,210 1,210 1,220 0 10 10 Sandalwood Industrial East B2 10,870 10,820 10,790 10,880 10,970 -80 100 180 Avondale B20 9,110 9,040 9,000 9,080 9,170 -110 60 170 Southgate B21 13,840 13,810 13,890 14,050 14,240 50 400 350 Bramalea South Industrial B22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gore Industrial South B23 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 Fletchers Creek South B24 29,840 29,840 30,050 30,370 30,720 210 880 670 Steeles Industrial B25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Toronto Gore Rural Estate A B26a 2,250 2,430 2,630 2,680 2,710 380 460 80 Toronto
    [Show full text]
  • The Dundas Bus Rapid Transit
    Dundas Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Welcome to the Dundas Bus Rapid Transit Virtual Open House Dundas Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Indigenous Relations at Metrolinx In 2018, Metrolinx made a commitment to building positive and meaningful relationships with Indigenous Peoples, communities and customers, in alignment with its strategic objectives. Metrolinx’s operating area transverses three traditional territories and 19 treaties. Did you know? Metrolinx regularly engages with 13 Indigenous Nations: • Williams Treaties First Nations • Six Nations of the Grand River • Huron-Wendat Nation • Kawartha Nishnawbe First Nation • Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation • Métis Nation of Ontario • Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council !! D STEELES AVE R N E NEYAGAW STEELES AVE W K M O KENNEDY RD 9TH LINE T TORBRAM RD Dundas RT nfrastructure Alignment as Proposed by the IBCMISSISSAUGA R STEELES AVE E !! D STEELES AVE R N E NEYAGAW STEELES AVE W K !! HALTON HILLS M O BRAMALEAKENNEDY RD 9TH LINE T TORBRAM RD Dundas RT nfrastructure Alignment as Proposed by the IBCMISSISSAUGA R D MAIN ST E BRAMPTON STEELES AVE E R !! LISGAR 410 A !! 407 E MILTON L A M SAFARI RD DOWNTOWN RY RD W ! GOREWAY DR BROCK RD ER !A S HALTON HILLS D D Y RD R ERR DIXIE RD Y CARLISLE RD MILTON DERRY RD EBRAMALEA B Dundas Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) K !! BRAMPTON D MAIN ST E P !! D R MEADOWVALE R W MALTON A !! LISGAR 410 T O D E !! 407 C R N L MILTON R O U O S R MILTON TN A S EY P I PA R M S K DR E R V I SAFARI RD DOWNTOWN RY RD W GOREWAY DR BROCK RD E ER A S D A A R M D Y RD o ERR DIXIE RD
    [Show full text]
  • Churchill Meadows Community Profile
    CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Planning and Building Department February, 2004 Churchill Meadows Community Profile History processing of development applications. mix of uses, a connected system of natural From 1987 to 1997 draft secondary plans features, parks, schools and stormwater The Churchill Meadows Residential District were prepared and the two areas were management facilities, a grid pattern of was originally part of the Town of Oakville combined into the Churchill Meadows streets and the creation of neighbourhood and designated for agricultural uses. With Planning District. During this time the last units. Lands in the north and south part of the advent of Regional Government in 1974, remaining greenfield was occupied by the planning district are under construction the City of Mississauga was established and several working farms, along with individual and applications for the central area are Churchill Meadows was incorporated residences along the east and west sides of currently being processed. through the extension of its westerly Tenth Line West and the east side Table 1 - 2001 Total Population boundary to Ninth Line. of Ninth Line. Churchill In 1997 urban design guidelines The Official (Primary) Plan of 1981 identified Churchill Meadows as the major land uses for this area as were prepared for the Churchill Mississauga Meadows a % of residential for the lands north of Eglinton Meadows Planning District Avenue West (Winston Churchill Residential providing direction to the public Mississauga District) and mixed industrial and commercial and private sectors with respect to Male 2,675 301,495 0.9% the design intent of the City in for the lands located south of Eglinton Fe m ale 2,770 309,235 0.9% Avenue West (Central Business District).
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    transportation OPPORTUNITIES IN THE GREATER TORONTO AREA BUILDING ON TORONTO TRANSIT CITY AND MOVE ONTARIO 2020 The Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario (RCCAO) is an alliance composed of management and labour groups that represent all facets of the construction industry. Its stakeholders stem from residential and civil sectors of the construction industry, creating a unified voice. The RCCAO's goal is to work in cooperation with governments and related stakeholders to offer realistic solutions to a variety of challenges facing the construction industry. RCCAO members and contributors are: • Metro Toronto Apartment Builders Association • Toronto Residential Construction Labour Bureau • Heavy Construction Association of Toronto • Greater Toronto Sewer and Waterman Contractors Association • Residential Low-rise Forming Contractors Association of Metro Toronto & Vicinity • LIUNA Local 183 • Residential Carpentry Contractors Association • Carpenters' Union • Ontario Concrete & Drain Contractors Association • Toronto and Area Road Builders Association RCCAO is also a founding member of the Infrastructure Investment Coalition (IIC). For more information please visit: www.rccao.com www.infracoalition.ca BUILDING ON TORONTO TRANSIT CITY AND MOVEONTARIO 2020 AN INDEPENDENT STUDY FUNDED BY THE RESIDENTIAL AND CIVIL CONSTRUCTION ALLIANCE OF ONTARIO RICHARD M. SOBERMAN TRIMAP COMMUNICATIONS INC. JANUARY 2008 abstract 2007 was a banner year for transportation announcements including mobilization of a new regional transportation authority (Metrolinx), a federal/provincial agreement to fund a number of transit initiatives in Peel, York, Toronto, and Durham, seven new LRT routes as part of Toronto Transit City, and two thirds of the funding for 52 transit projects under MoveOntario 2020. With respect to Toronto Transit City, the study emphasizes that implementing true LRT service on existing streets requires a fundamental policy decision on the part of municipal officials to either reduce road capacity for automotive traffic and parking or to widen roads.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Whitby Report Recommendation Report
    TOWN OF WHITBY REPORT RECOMMENDATION REPORT REPORT TO: Operations Committee REPORT NO: PW 50-08 DATE OF MEETING: November 10, 2008 FILE NO(S): N/A PREPARED BY: Planning/Public Works Joint Report LOCATION: GTHA REPORT TITLE/SUBJECT: Metrolinx: Draft Regional Transportation Plan; Draft Investment Strategy 1.0 RECOMMENDATION: 1 That Public Works/Planning Report Item PW 50-08 be received for information; 2 That Staff and Region comments contained in Report Item PW 50-08 concerning the Draft Regional Transportation Plan and Draft Investment Strategy released by Metrolinx be endorsed by Council; 3 That a copy of Report Item PW 50-08 be forwarded to Metrolinx, the Region of Durham and the Ministry of Transportation. 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In September 2008, Metrolinx released its Draft Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), entitled, The Big Move: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area and Draft Investment Strategy, A Plan for Implementation Action for public and stakeholder review and comments. The Draft RTP provides Metrolinx's vision and implementation strategy for the creation of a Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) transit and public transportation system, while the Draft Investment Strategy outlines the proposed financing of the plan. Public comments are requested by November 14, 2008. Durham Region staff, through Joint Commissioner’s No. 2008-J-39 completed a thorough review of the Metrolinx documents and have provided a number of comments and recommendations for Metrolinx to consider to ensure that the RTP reflects the transportation issues of importance in the Region. Staff concur with the Region's report recommendations, and offer additional comments and a Report to: Operations Committee Report No.: PW 50-08 Page 2 of 13 recommendation from the Town's perspective.
    [Show full text]