Strategies for Structured Product Information Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strategies for Structured Product Information Management EMA’s Product Information Management (PIM) project halted – Impact from the perspective of biotech companies on strategies for structured product information management Wissenschaftliche Prüfungsarbeit zur Erlangung des Titels „Master of Drug Regulatory Affairs“ der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vorgelegt von Dr. André Dorochevsky aus Augsburg Bonn 2011 Dr. André Dorochevsky Page 2 Strategies for structured product information management 04 July 2011 Betreuer und 1. Referent: Dr. Barbara Lachmann Zweiter Referent: Dr. Klaus Menges Dr. André Dorochevsky Page 3 Strategies for structured product information management 04 July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................ 3 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 8 1 THE BASIS OF STRUCTURED CONTENT: COMPONENT-BASED AUTHORING........................................................................................................... 10 1.1 PRINCIPLE OF COMPONENT-BASED AUTHORING ................................. 10 1.2 STRUCTURED (= COMPONENT-BASED AUTHORED) CONTENT EXCHANGE VIA XML .................................................................................... 12 2 POTENTIAL OF STRUCTURED CONTENT EXCHANGE: HEALTH AUTHORITY INITIATIVES ................................................................................. 13 2.1 STRUCTURED PRODUCT LABELING (SPL) IN THE US........................... 13 2.2 PRODUCT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (PIM) IN EUROPE .............. 15 2.2.1 Structure of product information for centrally authorised products............ 16 2.2.2 Structure of a PIM file ................................................................................ 17 2.2.2.1 The tree zone: Flexible data model for the PI of CAPs....................... 18 2.2.2.2 The document zone: Flexible PI document generation ....................... 22 2.2.3 Life cycle management of the PI of CAPs with PIM.................................. 22 2.2.4 Layout of PI documents and customization of QRD templates.................. 26 3 IMPACT OF HEALTH AUTHORITY INITIATIVES ....................................... 27 3.1 STRUCTURED PRODUCT LABELING (SPL) IN THE US........................... 27 3.2 PRODUCT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (PIM) IN EUROPE .............. 27 4 THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE................................. 30 4.1 POTENTIAL BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRANSITION FROM WORD-BASED TO COMPONENT-BASED AUTHORING .............. 31 4.1.1 Content re-use ............................................................................................. 31 4.1.2 Preparation of product information documents........................................... 33 4.2 BASIC FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTHORING TOOLS....... 33 4.3 EXTENDED SCOPE: COMPREHENSIVE LABELLING SYSTEMS............ 34 4.3.1 Support of legal compliance ....................................................................... 35 4.3.2 Support of GMP compliance....................................................................... 36 4.3.3 Translation support ..................................................................................... 36 4.3.4 Support of associated processes.................................................................. 36 Dr. André Dorochevsky Page 4 Strategies for structured product information management 04 July 2011 4.4 IMPLEMENTATION OPTIONS: GENERAL COST-BENEFIT CONSIDERATIONS AND BASIC CRITERIA FOR DECISION ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 37 5 THE BIOTECH VIEW ON STRUCTURED PRODUCT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT...................................................................................................... 43 5.1 EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OPTIONS FROM THE BIOTECH PERSPECTIVE................................................................................ 43 5.2 IMPACT OF THE PIM PROJECT BEING HALTED ...................................... 44 6 OUTLOOK AND CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................... 46 LIST OF REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 49 APPENDIX 1: SCREENSHOT SPLFORM_DRUGLISTING.XHTML......................... 53 APPENDIX 2: SCREENSHOT LAT V 4.2......................................................................... 54 APPENDIX 3: COMPANIES WITH CENTRALLY APPROVED PRODUCTS .......... 55 Dr. André Dorochevsky Page 5 Strategies for structured product information management 04 July 2011 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Elements used for the generation of the name of the medicinal product in different PI documents....................................................................................... 21 Table 2 Levels where PI documents can be generated ................................................... 22 Table 3 Key exchange steps for an initial MAA............................................................. 25 Table 4 Basic functions required for authoring tools...................................................... 34 Table 5 Evaluation of alternative implementation designs: Performance criteria .......... 39 Table 6 Evaluation of alternative implementation designs: Cost criteria ....................... 40 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 EMA implementation plan for PIM for centrally approved products (Status: September 2009).................................................................................................. 8 Figure 2 Principle of component-based authoring ........................................................... 11 Figure 3 Exchange of PDF documents versus exchange of structured content via XML .................................................................................................................. 12 Figure 4 Structure of an SPL file ..................................................................................... 15 Figure 5 Instability of the DES standard.......................................................................... 16 Figure 6 Data exchange standard (DES): Hierarchical data model.................................. 18 Figure 7 Structure of a PIM file ....................................................................................... 20 Figure 8 Data exchange standard (DES): Multiplication of branches.............................. 21 Figure 9 Components of the PIM system......................................................................... 24 Figure 10 Statistics on companies involved in the centralised procedure according to the number of CAPs per company..................................................................... 29 Figure 11 Workload savings potential in dependence of the complexity of the product information......................................................................................................... 32 Figure 12 Workload savings potential in dependence of the complexity of the product information, the activity and the number of managed products ........................ 33 Figure 13 Evaluation of alternative implementation designs: Performance criteria .......... 41 Figure 14 Evaluation of alternative implementation designs: Cost criteria ....................... 41 Figure 15 Evaluation of alternative implementation designs from the biotech perspective ......................................................................................................... 44 Dr. André Dorochevsky Page 6 Strategies for structured product information management 04 July 2011 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ANSI American National Standards Institute AR Assessment report CAPs Centrally authorised products CBER Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research CC Country code CCDS Company core data sheet CCM Component content management CCSI Company core safety information CDER Center for Drug Evaluation and Research CEN European Committee for Standardization CFR Code of Federal Regulations CHMP Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use CIOMS Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences CP Centralized procedure CRO Contract research organisation DCP Decentralised procedure DES Data Exchange Standard DITA Darwin Information Typing Architecture DRLS Drug Registration and Listing System EC European Commission EFPIA European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations EMA European Medicines Agency EN English EPAR European public assessment report EU European Union FDA US Food and Drug Administration FTE Full time equivalent GMP Good Manufacturing Practice HA Health authority HL7 Health Level Seven International HTML Hypertext Markup Language ICH International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use ID Identifier IDMP Identification of Medicinal Products ISO International Organization for Standardization IT Information technology JAR Joint assessment report LAT Light Authoring Tool LOINC Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes LoOI List of outstanding
Recommended publications
  • Beecham Group PLC and Another V Triomed (Pty) Ltd [2002] 4 All SA 193 (SCA)
    Beecham Group PLC and another v Triomed (Pty) Ltd [2002] 4 All SA 193 (SCA) Division: Supreme Court of Appeal Date: 19 September 2002 Case No: 100/01 Before: Harms, Scott, Mpati, Conradie JJA and Jones AJA Sourced by: PR Cronje Summarised by: D.Harris Parallel Citation: 2003 (3) SA 639 (SCA) . Editor's Summary . Cases Referred to . Judgment . [1] Intellectual property ­ Trade marks ­ Registration of shape as trade mark ­ Where shape is not intended to be used to distinguish owner's products from those of another, it cannot be regarded as a trade mark ­ Application for expungement from trade marks register therefore allowed. Editor's Summary Both parties involved in the present matter were players in the pharmaceutical industry. The Appellants sought the upholding of a trade mark for the shape of a tablet, and a finding that the Respondent had infringed the trade mark. The Respondent imported a tablet with the same composition and shape as that of the Appellants. In the court a quo, the Respondent applied for the expungement from the trade mark register of the shape trade mark. The Appellants launched a counter­application for relief for trade mark infringement. The latter application failed while that of the Respondent succeeded. Held ­ Interested parties may apply to court for the removal of an entry wrongly made or remaining on the trade mark register. The first question posed by the Court was whether the Appellants' shape mark constituted a trade mark in terms of section 10(1) of the Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993 ("the Act").
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Corporate Success Abstract
    Explaining corporate success: Britain’s best performing firms, 1949-1985 D.M. Higgins, S. Toms The York Management School Abstract The paper synthesises theories of competitive advantage in a dynamic framework to explain the determinants of corporate success. A model is presented linking the firm’s resource audit and dynamic capabilities with the rate of market growth. For the purposes of testing the model, an examination of the performance of all British quoted companies during the period is conducted with reference to achieved long run average rates of return on capital employed. The best performing firms are analysed in more detail and their strategies mapped according to the model criteria. Conclusions are then drawn on the possible strategies for achieving long run corporate success in terms of above average financial returns. Correspondence Steven Toms Joint Editor: Business History Professor of Accounting and Finance and Head of School The York Management School Sally Baldwin Buildings University of York York YO10 5DD Tel: (44) 1904-434122 Fax: (44) 1904-433 431 Email: [email protected] http://www.york.ac.uk/management/staff/StaffProfiles/SToms.htm 1 Explaining corporate success: Britain’s best performing firms, 1949-1985 1. Introduction Competitive advantage and more specifically sustained competitive advantage and its determinants, has become an important research topic in the business and management and industrial organisation literatures. Sustained competitive advantage (SCA) implies not just achieving superior returns, but achieving them over a protracted period of time. It is therefore surprising that the overwhelming majority of this literature has not explored the notion of sustained competitive advantage from a historical perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaxosmithkline Plc Annual Report for the Year Ended 31St December 2000
    GlaxoSmithKline 01 GlaxoSmithKline plc Annual Report for the year ended 31st December 2000 Contents Report of the Directors 02 Financial summary 03 Joint statement by the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer 05 Description of business 29 Corporate governance 37 Remuneration report 47 Operating and financial review and prospects 69 Financial statements 70 Directors’ statements of responsibility 71 Report by the auditors 72 Consolidated statement of profit and loss 72 Consolidated statement of total recognised gains and losses 74 Consolidated statement of cash flow 76 Consolidated balance sheet 76 Reconciliation of movements in equity shareholders’ funds 77 Company balance sheet 78 Notes to the financial statements 136 Group companies 142 Principal financial statements in US$ 144 Financial record 153 Investor information 154 Shareholder return 156 Taxation information for shareholders 157 Shareholder information 158 Share capital 160 Cross reference to Form 20-F 162 Glossary of terms The Annual Report was approved by the Board 163 Index of Directors on 22nd March 2001 and published on 12th April 2001. Contact details 02 GlaxoSmithKline Financial summary 2000 1999 Increase Business performance £m £m CER % £ % Sales 18,079 16,164 9 12 Trading profit 5,026 4,378 12 15 Profit before taxation 5,327 4,708 11 13 Earnings/Net income 3,697 3,222 13 15 Earnings per Ordinary Share 61.0p 52.7p 14 16 Total results Profit before taxation 6,029 4,236 Earnings/Net income 4,154 2,859 Earnings per Ordinary Share 68.5p 46.7p Business performance: results exclude merger items and restructuring costs; 1999 sales and trading profit exclude the Healthcare Services businesses which were disposed of in 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette Republic of Namibia
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$16.68 WINDHOEK- 2 September 1996 No. 1396 CONTENTS TRADE MARKS .............................................................................................................................. APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS IN NAMIBIA (Applications accepted in terms of Act No. 48 of 1973) '\ Any person who has grounds for objection to any of the following trade marks, may, within the prescribed time, lodge Notice of Opposition on form SM6 con­ tained in the Second Schedule to the Trade Marks Rules in Namibia, 1973. The prescribed time is two months after the date of advertisement. This period may on application be extended by the Registrar. Where the Gazette is issued late, the period of opposition will count as from the date of issue and a notice relating thereto will be displayed on the public notice board in the Trade Marks Registry. Formal opposition should not be lodged until after notice has been given by letter to the applicant for registration so as to afford him an opportunity of withdrawing his application before the expense of preparing the Notice of Opposition is in­ curred. Failing such notice to the applicant an opponent may not succeed in ob­ taining an order for costs. "B" preceding the number indicates Part B of the Trade Mark Register. Neither the office mentioned hereunder nor Central Bureau Services (Pty) Ltd., acting on behalf of the Government of Namibia, guarantee the accuracy of this publication or undertake any responsibility for errors or omissions or their conse­ quences. E.T. KAMBOUA REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS FOR NAMIBIA 2 Government Gazette 2 September 1996 No. 1396 TRADE MARKS REMOVED FROM 1 JULY 1992 TO 30 JUNE 1996 NO.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Entitled an Oral Dosage Form of Ceftriaxone Sodium Using Enteric
    A Thesis entitled An oral dosage form of ceftriaxone sodium using enteric coated sustained release calcium alginate beads by Darshan Lalwani Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Degree in Pharmaceutical Sciences with Industrial Pharmacy Option _________________________________________ Jerry Nesamony, Ph.D., Committee Chair _________________________________________ Sai Hanuman Sagar Boddu, Ph.D, Committee Member _________________________________________ Youssef Sari, Ph.D., Committee Member _________________________________________ Patricia R. Komuniecki, PhD, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2015 Copyright 2015, Darshan Narendra Lalwani This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of An oral dosage form of ceftriaxone sodium using enteric coated sustained release calcium alginate beads by Darshan Lalwani Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science Degree in Pharmaceutical Sciences with Industrial Pharmacy option The University of Toledo May 2015 Purpose: Ceftriaxone (CTZ) is a broad spectrum semisynthetic, third generation cephalosporin antibiotic. It is an acid labile drug belonging to class III of biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS). It can be solvated quickly but suffers from the drawback of poor oral bioavailability owing to its limited permeability through
    [Show full text]
  • Honorary Graduates
    Honorary Graduates (Chronological list) The names of deceased graduates are printed in italics. Master of Arts (MA) George Harris Thomson, Secretary-Treasurer of the Royal College of Science and Technology from 1947 to 1964, Registrar of the University from 1964 to 1966 July 1966 Charles Geoffrey Wood, University Librarian March 1967 William B Paton, County Librarian, Lanarkshire - First Head of the Scottish School of Librarianship, Scottish College of Commerce, 1946-50 April 1972 Gustav Heiberg, Chief of Division, Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs July 1975 Charles Stewart, formerly Depute Bursar (Finance) in the University Administration Oct 1975 Louis McGougan, Bursur of the University of Strathclyde March 1976 Duncan Matheson, formerly Director of Physical Education in the University July 1983 Walter Underwood, formerly Planning Consultant to the University July 1983 Zbigniew Byszewski, former Consul-General for Poland in Scotland June 1986 John Turner, Organist to the University and Glasgow Cathedral July 1990 Susan Wighton, who worked as a nurse in Palestinian refugee camps July 1990 Andrew Miller, Director of Libraries, City of Glasgow District Council July 1990 Tommy Orr, former University Security Controller July 1990 James Arnold, Director and Village Manager, Lanark New Town Nov 1990 Graham Douglas, Draughtsman, Royal Commission on Ancient Building and Historical Monuments of Scotland July 1992 Yvonne Carol Grace Murray, Athlete May 1995 Master of Science (MSc) Ronald Ewart Nicoll, Professor of Urban Planning March 1967
    [Show full text]
  • 94771408.Pdf
    VSB — TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA FACULTY OF ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Zhodnocení finanční pozice společnosti GlaxoSmithKline, a.s. Evaluation of Financial Position of the Company GlaxoSmithKline plc. Student: Xinran Chen Supervisor of the bachelor thesis: Ing. Ingrid Petrová, Ph.D. Ostrava 2017 Content 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 2 Description of the Financial Analysis Methodology ........................................................... 6 2.1 Goal of financial analysis ......................................................................................... 6 2.2 Source of data for financial analysis ......................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Balance sheet .................................................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Income statement ............................................................................................ 9 2.2.3 Cash flow statement ..................................................................................... 10 2.3 Common-size analysis ............................................................................................ 12 2.3.1 Vertical common-size analysis ..................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Horizontal common-size analysis ................................................................ 13 2.4 Financial ratio analysis ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Other Statutory Disclosures Continued
    272 GSK Annual Report 2016 Other statutory disclosures continued Group companies In accordance with Section 409 of the Companies Act 2006 a full list of subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures and joint arrangements, the address of the registered office and effective percentage of equity owned, as at 31 December 2016 are disclosed below. Unless otherwise stated the share capital disclosed comprises ordinary shares which are indirectly held by GlaxoSmithKline plc. The percentage held by class of share is stated where this is less than 100%. Unless otherwise stated, all subsidiary companies have their registered office in their country of incorporation. All subsidiary companies are resident for tax purposes in their country of incorporation unless otherwise stated. Name Security Registered address Wholly owned subsidiaries 1506369 Alberta ULC Common 3500 855-2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB, T2P 4J8, Canada Action Potential Venture Capital Limited Ordinary 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS, England Adechsa GmbH (iv) Ordinary c/o PRV Provides Treuhandgesellschaft AG, Dorfstrasse 38, Baar, 6341, Switzerland Affymax Research Institute Common Corporation Service Company, 2710 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 150N, Sacramento, California, CA, 95833, United States Alenfarma – Especialidades Farmaceuticas, Ordinary Quota Rua Dr Antonio Loureiro Borges No 3, Arquiparque, Miraflores, Alges, Limitada (iv) 1495-131, Portugal Allen & Hanburys Limited (iv) Ordinary 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GS, England Allen & Hanburys Pharmaceutical Nigeria Limited Ordinary 24 Abimbola Way, Ilasamaja, Isolo, Lagos, Nigeria Allen Farmaceutica, S.A. Ordinary Severo Ochoa, 2, Parque Tecnologico de Madrid, Tres Cantos, Madrid, 28760, Spain Allen Pharmazeutika Gesellschaft m.b.H. Ordinary Wagenseilgasse 3, Euro Plaza, Gebäude I, 4.
    [Show full text]
  • GSK Annual Report 2002
    The Impact of Medicines Do more, feel better, live longer Annual Report 2002 www.gsk.com Mission Our global quest is to improve the quality of human life by enabling people to do more, feel better and live longer. Our Spirit We undertake our quest with the enthusiasm of entrepreneurs, excited by the constant search for innovation. We value performance achieved with integrity. We will attain success as a world class global leader with each and every one of our people contributing with passion and an unmatched sense of urgency. Strategic Intent We want to become the indisputable leader in our industry. GlaxoSmithKline plc is an English public limited company. Its shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange. GlaxoSmithKline plc acquired Glaxo Wellcome plc and SmithKline Beecham plc on 27th December 2000 by way of a scheme of arrangement for the merger of the two companies which became effective on 27th December 2000. This report is the Annual Report of GlaxoSmithKline plc for the year ended 31st December 2002. It comprises in a single document the Annual Report of the company in accordance with United Kingdom requirements and the Annual Report on Form 20-F to the Securities and Exchange Commission in the United States of America. A summary report on the year, the Annual Review 2002, intended for the investor not needing the full detail of the Annual Report, is produced as a separate document. The Annual Review includes the joint statement by the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, a summary review of operations, summary financial statements and a summary remuneration report.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom
    UNITED KINGDOM A & D Instruments Ltd Abertec Ltd Adams Business Associates Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, Oxford OX 14 Old College King St, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 Kelvin House, Totteridge Ave, High Wycombe, 3YS. 2AX. Bucks HP\3 6XG. Tel: 0235 5504201 0800 616140 Tel: 0970 622385 Telex: 35181 aby ucw Tel: 0494 465244 Fax: 0494 446788 Fax: 0235 550485 Fax: 0970 622959 Offer services in biotechnology including Supply semi-micro, analytical, general, industrial Involved in technology transfer from University of international market analysis, management and and moisture balances as well as density meters. Wales Aberystwyth. Capabilities include genetics, implementation of projects (including mergers and genetic engineering, bioproducts and acquisitions) and business development and biotransformations, biochemistry, plant and animal marketing programmes. Subsidiary offices now & A J Beveridge metabolism, biomass measurement, biosensing, established in Belguim, France and Spain. 5 Bonnington Road Lane, Leith, Edinburgh EH6 process control, tissue culture. Also undertakes 5BP. consultancy and collaborative research. Tel: 031 5535555 Fax: 031 5546068 ADC Systems Supply laboratory products. Gronant, Caernarfon, Gwynedd LL54 5BY. ABR Foods Ltd Tel: 0286 77148 Sallow Road, Weldon Industrial Estate, Corby Designs and manufactures analytical and Aaston Ltd NorthantsNNI7 \JX. preparative equipment for pathology laboratories Tel: 0536 65291 Telex: 34695 3 Abbas Business Centre, Itchen Abbas, Winchester, based on photometric determinations and robotic Fax: 0536 402228 HampshireS021IBQ. systems. Tel: 0980 6\0 391 Fax: 0980 610 898 Process wheat for the production of vital gluten as See Aaston Inc, MA, US. well as producing other related starch products, syrups and animal feed ingredients. Investigating ADM Ingredients Ltd opportunities for production of fermentation Church Manorway, Erith, Kent DA8 I DL.
    [Show full text]
  • The Founding of BRESA
    Volume II Appendices I – IV Appendix I THE CASE OF BRESAGEN Parcel 1: Radionucleotides Professor Robert Symons from the Biochemistry Department at the University of Adelaide developed a technique for the efficient production of 32P-labelled radionucleotides that was published in a leading scientific journal1 in 1977. These were radioactive compounds used to label DNA and RNA, and were widely used at the time in gene technology research. At the time, production of these radionucleotides was influenced by two factors: first, being radioactive and with a short half-life of 14 days, international shipping was difficult and costly. Second, manufacture was dominated by Amersham, a UK-based company, using inefficient technology, which kept prices high. This meant that increasingly, when Professor Symons had radionucleotides that were surplus to the needs of his own Department and its Centre for Gene Technology (also established in 1982), he increasingly began providing them for free to other laboratories in Australia. By the early 1980s, Bob Symons’s head of department, Professor Bill Elliott, suggested that rather than giving the radionucleotides away, he should set up a business. However, Bob Symons did not the patent the technique; as Allan Robins, a postdoctoral researcher at the time, commented, ‘this is back in the days when we were naïve academics. Nobody patented ideas, or we didn’t anyway, Bob didn’t’ (interview, 2007). 1 Nucleic Acids Research 1 According to the Bresa Product Catalogue (1984): BRESA [Ltd] was officially set up in [31] May, 1982 to develop and prepare for sale a range of high quality materials for use in gene technology.
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE 100 Constituent History Updated
    FTSE 100 Constituent Changes Date Added Deleted Notes 19-Jan-84 CJ Rothschild Eagle Star 02-Apr-84 Lonrho Magnet Sthrns. 02-Jul-84 Reuters Edinburgh Inv. Trust 02-Jul-84 Woolworths Barrat Development 19-Jul-84 Enterprise Oil Bowater Corporation 01-Oct-84 Willis Faber Wimpey (George) 01-Oct-84 Granada Group Scottish & Newcastle 01-Oct-84 Dowty Group MFI Furniture 04-Dec-84 Brit. Telecom Matthey Johnson 02-Jan-85 Dee Corporation Dowty Group 02-Jan-85 Argyll Group Berisford (S.& W.) 02-Jan-85 MFI Furniture RMC Group 02-Jan-85 Dixons Group Dalgety 01-Feb-85 Jaguar Hambro Life 01-Apr-85 Guinness (A) Enterprise Oil 01-Apr-85 Smiths Inds. House of Fraser 01-Apr-85 Ranks Hovis McD. MFI Furniture 01-Jul-85 Abbey Life Ranks Hovis McD. 01-Jul-85 Debenhams I.C. Gas 06-Aug-85 Bnk. Scotland Debenhams 01-Oct-85 Habitat Mothercare Lonrho 02-Jan-86 Scottish & Newcastle Rothschild (J) 08-Jan-86 Storehouse Habitat Mothercare 08-Jan-86 Lonrho B.H.S. 01-Apr-86 Wellcome EXCO International 01-Apr-86 Coats Viyella Sun Life Assurance 01-Apr-86 Lucas Harrisons & Crosfield 01-Apr-86 Cookson Group Ultramar 21-Apr-86 Ranks Hovis McD. Imperial Group 22-Apr-86 RMC Group Distillers 01-Jul-86 British Printing & Comms. Corp Abbey Life 01-Jul-86 Burmah Oil Bank of Scotland 01-Jul-86 Saatchi & S. Ferranti International 01-Oct-86 Bunzl Brit. & Commonwealth 01-Oct-86 Amstrad BICC 01-Oct-86 Unigate Smiths Industries 09-Dec-86 British Gas Northern Foods 02-Jan-87 Hillsdown Holdings Argyll Group 02-Jan-87 I.C.
    [Show full text]