DOCSLIB.ORG

Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery Ashok K

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery Ashok K Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery Ashok K. Hemal • Mani Menon Editors Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery Second Edition Editors Ashok K. Hemal Mani Menon Department of Urology Vattikuti Urology Institute Comprehensive Cancer Center Henry Ford Health System Wake Forest Institute Detroit, MI for Regenerative Medicine USA Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston-Salem, NC USA ISBN 978-3-319-20644-8 ISBN 978-3-319-20645-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20645-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018941125 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature, under the registered company Springer International Publishing AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Preface It has been our privilege and honor to edit the second edition of Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery which comprises 70 chapters, 11 more than its fore- runner. Most of the chapters have been revamped, and many fresh faces have enriched this process. The authors include established pioneers of the field, the busiest practitioners of robotics, and the sharpest innovators of this gen- eration. It also features two seminal urologists who express a warm, witty, and highly personal experience in dealing with prostate cancer. Several new chapters have been added focusing on training, simulators, development of program, innovation in surgery, collaborative quality initia- tives, health services research, besides newer techniques of robotic surgeries and newer tools including robots. The editors are eternally grateful to all the individual contributors with their insightful contributions toward this book. Your work is what has made this edition possible. We would also like to appreciate our tireless coaches and cheerleaders. For Hemal and Menon, it has been a labor of love, but labor, nonetheless. Winston-Salem, NC, USA Ashok K. Hemal Detroit, MI, USA Mani Menon v Contents Part I History, Basics, and Development of Program 1 The History of Robotic Surgery ���������������������������������������������������� 3 Michael E. Moran 2 Robotic Instrumentation and Operating Room Setup �������������� 29 Matthew J. Ziegelmann and Matthew T. Gettman 3 Port Placement in Robotic Urologic Surgery ������������������������������ 45 Kyle A. Blum and Ketan K. Badani 4 Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic Urologic Surgery ���������� 59 Michael A. Olympio 5 Robotic Urologic Surgery: How to Make an Effective Robotic Program ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 77 Firas Abdollah, Tarun Jindal, and Craig Rogers 6 Laparoscopy Versus Robotics: Ergonomics—Does It Matter? ������ 83 Theodoros Tokas, Ali Serdar Gözen, Jan Klein, Alexandra Tschada, Thomas Frede, Dogu Teber, and Jens Rassweiler 7 The Robotic Patient-Side Assistant ���������������������������������������������� 109 Phillip Mucksavage and Daniel D. Eun 8 Training of Operating Room Technician and Nurses in Robotic Surgery ������������������������������������������������������������������������ 121 Stacey Dusik-Fenton and James O. Peabody 9 Robotic Urologic Surgery: How to Make an Effective Robotic Program—A European Perspective �������������� 129 Paolo Umari, Giorgio Gandaglia, Nicola Fossati, Alessandro Volpe, Ruben De Groote, and Alexandre Mottrie 10 My Prostate Cancer: Patient’s Perspective ���������������������������������� 141 John M. Barry 11 Treater to Target: A Urologist’s Personal Experience with Prostate Cancer �������������������������������������������������������������������� 149 Paul F. Schellhammer vii viii Contents Part II Training, Credentialing and Research 12 Training in Robotic Urologic Surgery ������������������������������������������ 163 Michael D. Weintraub, Steven V. Kheyfets, and Chandru P. Sundaram 13 Animal Laboratory Training: Current Status and How Essential Is It? ���������������������������������������������������������������� 175 Spencer Craven and Alvin C. Goh 14 Impact of Virtual Reality Simulator in Training of Robotic Surgery �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 183 Hana Yokoi, Jian Chen, Mihir M. Desai, and Andrew J. Hung 15 Credentialing and Hospital Privileging for Robotic Urological Surgery �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 203 Alexander G. Van Hoof and David M. Albala 16 Innovation in Surgery: Idea, Development, Assessment, Exploration, and Long-Term Monitoring (IDEAL) Guidelines ������ 217 Vikram Narayan, Giulia Ippolito Lane, and Philipp Dahm 17 Collaborative Quality Initiatives �������������������������������������������������� 225 Amy N. Luckenbaugh, Khurshid R. Ghani, and David C. Miller 18 Health Services Research and Robotic Surgery �������������������������� 235 Alexander P. Cole, David F. Friedlander, and Quoc-Dien Trinh Part III Prostate 19 Development of the Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: Historical Perspective and Technical Nuances ���������������������������� 255 Firas Abdollah, Deepansh Dalela, and Mani Menon 20 Nerve Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Assessment of Clinical and Technical Factors Impacting Recovery of Sexual Function �������������������������������������������������������� 275 Kamaljot S. Kaler, Simone Vernez, Douglas Skarecky, and Thomas E. Ahlering 21 Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Simulating the Gold Standard ������������������������������������������������������ 289 Ahmed Ghazi and Jean Joseph 22 Retzius-Sparing Approach for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy ������������������������������������������ 299 Antonio Galfano, Silvia Secco, Dario Di Trapani, Giovanni Petralia, Elena Strada, and Aldo Massimo Bocciardi 23 Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer and Nomograms ���������������������������������������������������������������������������� 317 Emanuele Zaffuto, Giorgio Gandaglia, Nicola Fossati, Francesco Montorsi, and Alberto Briganti Contents ix 24 Current Concepts in Cavernosal Neural Anatomy and Imaging and Their Implications for Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy ������������������������������������������������������������������ 331 Daniel Sagalovich, Thomas Bessede, and Ashutosh K. Tewari 25 Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Large Glands and Median Lobe �������������������������������������������������������������������������� 353 Weil Lai, Uğur Boylu, and Raju Thomas 26 Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Clinically High-Risk Prostate Cancer �������������� 363 Malte W. Vetterlein, Mani Menon, and Firas Abdollah 27 Techniques to Improve Urinary Continence Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy ���������������������������������������� 375 Mona Yezdani, Pierre Mendoza, Saurabh Sharma, and David I. Lee 28 Techniques to Improve Sexual Function Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy ���������������������������������������� 401 Nicola Fossati, Alberto Briganti, Giorgio Gandaglia, Alexandre Mottrie, and Francesco Montorsi 29 Functional and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy ������������������������������������������������������������������ 409 Tarun Jindal, Firas Abdollah, Deepansh Dalela, and Mani Menon 30 Technical Modifications for Salvage and Complex Radical Prostatectomy ������������������������������������������������������������������ 427 Hariharan Palayapalayam Ganapathi, Gabriel Ogaya-Pinies, Eduardo Hernandez, Rafael Coelho, and Vipul R. Patel 31 Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy ������������������������������������������ 443 Giacomo Novara, Alessandro Morlacco, Riccardo Autorino, and Alexandre Mottrie 32 Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy ���������������������������������������� 451 Daniel Melecchi Freitas, Nariman Ahmadi, Sameer Chopra, and Monish Aron 33 Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Prostate Surgeon’s Perspective �������������������������������������������������������������������� 463 Hao G. Nguyen, Cole Davis, Helena Chang, and Peter R. Carroll 34 Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Margins Positivity and Implications on Cancer Control �������������������������� 471 Shay Golan, Vignesh Packiam, and Arieh L. Shalhav 35 Laparoscopy or Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Pros and Cons ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Past, Present and Future of Urological Robotic Surgery
    Review Article ICUrology 2016;57:75-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/icu.2016.57.2.75 pISSN 2466-0493 • eISSN 2466-054X Past, present and future of urological robotic surgery Wooju Jeong, Ramesh Kumar, Mani Menon Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA The first urologic robotic program in the world was built at the Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital Detroit, Michigan, in 2000 under the vision of surgical innovator, Dr. Mani Menon for the radical prostatectomy. The robot-assisted radical prostatec- tomy continues being modified with techniques to improve perioperative and surgical outcomes. The application of robotic surgi- cal technique has since been expanded to the bladder and upper urinary tract surgery. The evolution of surgical technique and its expansion of application will continue to improve quality, outcome parameters and experience for the patients. Keywords: Cystectomy; Nephrectomy; Prostatectomy; Robotics This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A PERFECT STORM informed his foresight in seeking to apply the surgical robot to urologic surgery. With the generous support from the Raj The Vattikuti Urology Institute (VUI) at Henry Ford and Padma Vattikuti Foundation, a perfect storm gathered Hospital in Detroit, Michigan, USA established the first to initiate our journey into the robotic era. urologic robotic surgery program in the world in 2000. It would not have happened without 3 crucial factors: an RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY innovative idea, an experienced surgeon with tremendous foresight, and considerable philanthropic funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Book
    SEPTEMBER 7–92006 northeastern Section of the AUA Scientific PROGRA M 2 Astellas Product Ad Cover 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Schedule at a Glance . 1-3 Officers and Committee Lists . 4 Supporter Recognition. 5 Research and Education Fund . 6-7 George E. Slotkin Lecturers. 8 Guest Speakers . 9–13 Publication of Abstracts . 14 Program . 15 –25 Nursing Program . 26 Social Event Info: Dine Around. 27–28 Social Event Info: Tours. 29–30 Social Event Info: Events . 31–33 Exhibitor Listing (alpha) . 34–38 Exhibitor Listing (by Booth Number) . 39 Disclosure Information . 40–41 CME Form. 42 REGISTER ON LINE AT WWW.AUANET.ORG/NORTHEASTERN/ CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION Accreditation Educational Goals and Objectives The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. is The Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Section of the American accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education Urological Association, Inc. is designed to provide a forum for communi- (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The cating to the members and guest physicians the developing state of the American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. takes art of science of urological techniques, evaluations and procedures. The responsibility for the content, quality and scientific integrity of this CME program will include original papers presenting new information address- activity. ing pertinent clinical topics. Panel discussion and point-counterpoint ses- sions on topical issues allow for participants to openly discuss procedure CME Credits and techniques. Participants will have the opportunity to discuss presen- tations and address questions to authors. At the completion of the The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalizability of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials in a "Real World" Setting: a Nationwide Survey Analysis
    Henry Ford Health System Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons Urology Articles Urology 11-19-2020 Generalizability of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials in a "Real World" Setting: A Nationwide Survey Analysis Deepansh Dalela Akshay Sood Jacob Keeley Craig G. Rogers Mani Menon See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/urology_articles Authors Deepansh Dalela, Akshay Sood, Jacob Keeley, Craig G. Rogers, Mani Menon, and Firas Abdollah ARTICLE IN PRESS Commentary Generalizability of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials in a “Real World” Setting: A Nationwide Survey Analysis Deepansh Dalela, Akshay Sood, Jacob Keeley, Craig Rogers, Mani Menon, and Firas Abdollah COMMENTARY Overall, 14,941 (weighted n = 15,405,057) men under- he Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer went annual PSA screening within the available years. (PLCO) and the European Randomized Study of The median (interquartile range) age for these men was Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trials 1,2 61 (53.3-69.0) years, compared to 60.3 in ERSPC. Inter- T ≤ have been widely used to inform policy decisions regard- estingly, 43% of men were aged 60 in our cohort, vs < ing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in the US. 32% in PLCO [P .001; PLCO only reported the percen- However, the generalizability of any trial to its intended tages in each age category; Fig. 1A]. Sensitivity analyses < population is directly contingent on the study subjects showed that the majority of men were aged 60 at their fi being "representative" of the "universe" (ie, US men with- rst PSA screening test (34% aged 40-49, 23.8% aged 50- out symptoms or known diagnosis of prostate cancer 54 and 13.5% aged 55-59).
    [Show full text]
  • How to Meet Competing Goals During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Laparoscopic & Robotic CANCER CONTROL AND PRESERVATION OF NEUROVASCULAR TISSUE TEWARI ET AL. Laparoscopic and Robotic Urology Associate Editor Cancer control and the preservation of Ash Tewari neurovascular tissue: how to meet Editorial Board competing goals during robotic Ralph Clayman, USA Inderbir Gill, USA radical prostatectomy Roger Kirby, UK Mani Menon, USA Ashutosh Tewari, Sandhya Rao, Juan I. Martinez-Salamanca, Robert Leung, Rajan Ramanathan, Anil Mandhani, E. Darracott Vaughan, Mani Menon*, Wolfgang Horninger†, Jiangling Tu‡ and Georg Bartsch† The New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Departments of Urology and ‡Pathology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, *Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA, and †The Institute of Urology, Innsbruck, Austria Accepted for publication 27 September 2007 RESULTS Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 The athermal technique addresses concerns about the use of thermal energy and OBJECTIVE bulldog clamps during nerve sparing, and emphasizes the importance of the trizonal To present early functional and oncological neural architecture. We analysed the data for the athermal trizonal nerve-sparing surgical outcomes of 215 consecutive technique of robotic radical prostatectomy patients from January 2005. The operative (RP), that addresses the concerns about duration was 120–240 min and the mean deviations from the principles of open RP and blood loss was 150 mL. In patients potent revisits the anatomical foundations of this before RP the potency rate at 1 year after surgery from the robotic perspective. bilateral nerve-sparing was 87%. The overall surgical margin rate was 6.5% and positive PATIENTS AND METHODS margin rates for organ-confined cancer were 4.7%.
    [Show full text]
  • Robotic Radical Prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute Technique: an Interim Analysis of Results and Technical Points
    ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AND THE VATTIKUTI UROLOGY INSTITUTE TECHNIQUE: AN INTERIM ANALYSIS OF RESULTS AND TECHNICAL POINTS MANI MENON, ASHUTOSH TEWARI, AND MEMBERS OF THE VATTIKUTI INSTITUTE PROSTATECTOMY TEAM ABSTRACT We have performed Ͼ350 robotic radical prostatectomies in the last 2 years. A single surgeon (MM) performed 250 of these procedures using a technique developed at our institution, the Vattikuti Urology Institute. This article summarizes the technical highlights and interim results of the Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy (VIP) technique. We prospectively collected baseline demographic data, such as age, race, body mass index (BMI), serum prostate-specific antigen values, prostate volume, Gleason score, percentage cancer, TNM clinical staging, and comorbidities. Urinary symptoms were measured with the International Prostate Symptom Score, and sexual health with the Sexual Health Inventory of Males. In addition, patients received the Expanded Prostate Inventory Composite at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after the procedure via mail. Data collection is complete on 200 of the first 250 patient cases. Gleason score Ն7 was noted in 40% of patients. The average BMI was high (28), and 86% patients were classified as pathologic stage pT2a to pT2b. The mean operative time was 160 minutes and the mean blood loss was 153 mL. No patient required blood transfusion. At 6 months, 82% of the men who were Ͻ60 years of age and 75% of those Ͼ60 years of age had return of sexual function, and 64% and 38%, respectively, had sexual intercourse. At 6 months, 96% patients were continent. UROLOGY 61: 15–20, 2003. © 2003, Elsevier Science Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • From the President
    A publication for members of the Henry ALUMNI Ford Medical Group ASSOCIATION Alumni Association, Henry Ford physicians, residents and alumni Fall 2017 • VOLUME 30 NO.1 FEATURE Global Education • pg. 4 FEATURE: Cancer Technology • pg. 2 FEATURE Breaking Ground pg. 6 AWARDS pg. 12 ALUMNI News & Updates • pg. 8 www.henryford.com/alumni Facebook: www.facebook.com/groups/HFMGAlumni/ all is here, and winter is on its way, but education that Henry Ford has been providing From the I’d like to take you back to earlier this for many years. When these new doctors year, to summer—a time of transition in graduate, we expect that they will be President Facademic medicine. This June, we celebrated compassionate, competent, and skilled the graduation of another accomplished group members of their specialties, just like all of you! of residents and fellows. We watched with pride Similarly, the Alumni Association is also in as this group of fine physicians matriculated on a time of transition. We have some new faces to new careers and new opportunities, having and new ideas. Yet we are committed to been well trained and well prepared by their maintaining the same commitment to mentors here at Henry Ford. excellence and support that you have come to In July, we welcomed a new class of bright expect. We look forward to sharing with you young physicians to Henry Ford Hospital. As I our plans, which you can read more about on looked out over the crowd of eager, anxious page 10. new doctors, I was reminded of what a We are very excited about the opportunities tremendous privilege we have to work in a that lie before us.
    [Show full text]
  • Paving the Way for Excellent Clinical Outcomes
    Edition 1 | April 2014 Paving the Way for Excellent Clinical Outcomes Surgeons now have access to state-of-the-art systems that replace open procedures with minimally invasive laparoscopic alternatives. Read more open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com From the CEO’s Desk It gives me great pleasure to inform you that this is the premier issue of The Edge, the Vattikuti Technologies newsletter. This will carry news and events of interest for surgeons interested in robotic surgery. Read more Vattikuti Technologies Hosts Dr. Robert Cerfolio A renowned professor of cardiovascular/thoracic surgery at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Dr.Cerfolio was specially invited by the Vattikuti Foundation to participate in the Robotic Surgeons Council of India meeting on the 8th and 9th of February 2014. Read more Read more open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com Doctor’s Corner Case Study: Aster Medcity da Vinci® in the News Independent study reveals robot-assisted hysterectomy delivers better results Read more Find out how the da Vinci® surgical system can be used Dr. Rooma Sinha, Aster Medcity is equipped to perform single-site, Dr. Ananthakrishnan with first-of-its-kind virtually scarless intra- Sivaraman, and Dr. Santosh advanced technologies and abdominal hysterectomy Shetty give us their views on will take healthcare in India ® Learn more the da Vinci surgical to international standards. system. This edition also features an article on robotic Aster Medcity is bringing surgery by robotic and endoscopic European Urology releases Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Robotic Surgeons Council of India XII Meeting
    Vattikuti Foundation Presents Robotic Surgeons Council of India XII Meeting Scientific Program 16th – 17th November 2019 Le Pondy Resort, Pondicherry Dr. Mahendra Bhandari CEO, Vattikuti Foundation ROBOTIC SURGEONS COUNCIL OF INDIA 2019 –SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM (DAY 1) 16th November 2019 8:00 – 8:45 AM – Breakfast, Registration, Networking Session 1. 9.00 – 9:45 AM 9:00 AM-9.05 AM A message from Mr. Raj Vattikuti, Chairman, Vattikuti Foundation Welcome - Mahendra Bhandari Director of Robotic Surgery Education and Research, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital; CEO, Vattikuti Foundation 9:15 – 9:45 AM Chairperson: Dr. C Palanivelu, Chairman, Gem Hospital, Coimbatore Guest Lecture – Randomized Controlled Trials in Minimally Invasive Surgery: What is the Truth and How Is It Accepted? Speaker: Mani Menon, MD, Director Emeritus, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit. Discussion Session 2. 9:45 – 11:00 AM (1 hour 15 minutes) Moderator: Gagan Gautam, New Delhi “Robotic Surgery Training in India: Current status…and the road ahead” 1. Introduction – Santosh Waigankar, Mumbai – (3 min) 2. Robotic surgery fellowships in India: Inception and current status SP Somashekhar, Manipal Vattikuti Institute, Manipal Hospital Bengaluru – (8 min) 3. Fellowship training in India: Hits and misses - A mentor’s perspective Rajesh Ahlawat, Medanta, Gurugram – (8 min) 4. Fellowship training in India: Hit and misses - A fellow’s perspective Santosh Waigankar, Mumbai – (8 min) 5. How to build the ideal robotic training program: The VUI experience Mani Menon, Detroit, USA – (8 min) 6. Proctoring robotic surgery: A different ballgame altogether Gagan Gautam, New Delhi – (8 min) 7. Prospective study on learning curve for trained resident in robotic colorectal surgery being trained by experiences robotic surgeon - Aravindan R., Bengaluru (8 min) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy (Vip) and Current Results
    UROLOGY ROBOTIC SURGERY Arch. Esp. Urol., 60, 4 (397-407), 2007 VATTIKUTI INSTITUTE PROSTATECTOMY (VIP) AND CURRENT RESULTS. Mahendra Bhandari and Mani Menon. Vattikuti Urology Institute. Henry Ford Health System. Detroit. USA. Summary.- OBJECTIVES: To describe a technique of VIP, as it has evolved in our hands over a period of 5 Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RAP) for localized years, has given excellent outcomes in terms of cancer carcinoma of the prostate, the Vattikuti Institute Prostatec- control, continence and erectile function. Our modifica- tomy (VIP) and an innovative incremental nerve preser- tions of the surgical technique had a singular focus on vation technique, the Veil of Aphrodite. We also report consistent improvement of the so called “Trifecta”, taking complications, oncolgical and functional outcomes in a radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) published data as cohort of the patient operated during 2001-2006. a reference standard. We present our current technique of VIP with preservation of the lateral prostatic fascia METHODS: 2.652 patients with localiced carcinoma (“Veil of Aphrodite”). of prostate underwent VIP at our centre between 2001- 2006. Our current technique involves: early division of RESULTS: In this report we include 2077 patients with the bladder neck, preservation of the lateral pelvic fas- follow-up ranging from 4 weeks to 260 weeks (median cia and control of the dorsal vein complex after apical 68 weeks). We have a low incidence (1.5%) of pe- dissection of the prostate. Oncological, functional and rioperative complications. 97.6% of our patients had a follow-up information was obtained through “ROBO- hospital stay of less than 48 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Fred Muhletaler Maggiolo
    CURRICULUM VITAE Fred Muhletaler Maggiolo Address: 14286 Paradise Point Rd., Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Cell Phone: 313-244-7148 Email: [email protected] Place of Birth: Lima, Peru Current Position 7/2015 - now Director of Robotic Urology Palms West Hospital and Palm Beach Advanced Robotics Prior Training 07/2014- 06/2015 Robotic Transplant Fellow Fellowship in Robotic Renal Transplant Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan James O. Peabody (Program Director) Mani Menon (Chairman) 07/2013- 06/2014 Senior Fellow Fellowship in Minimally Invasive urologic Surgery Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan James O. Peabody (Program Director) Mani Menon (Chairman) 07/2012- 06/2013 Chief Urology Resident Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan Jack S. Elder, MD (Program Director) Mani Menon, MD (Chairman) 07/2009 – 06/2013 Residency Urology Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan Jack S. Elder, MD (Program Director) Mani Menon, MD (Chairman) 07/2008 - 06/2009 Residency General Surgery Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan Alexander Shepard, MD (Program Director) Ann Woodward, MD (Program Director) Scott A. Dulchavsky, MD, PhD (Chairman) 09/2006 - 06/2008 Fellowship in Oncologic Urological Robotic Surgery Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan James O. Peabody, MD (Program Director) Mani Menon, MD (Chairman) Medical Education 03/1996 - 12/2003 Medical Doctor Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Peru Undergraduate Education 03/1994 - 11/1995 Biology. Bachelor in Science Colegio Alexander von Humboldt, Lima , Peru Membership and Honorary/Professional Societies Peruvian Medical Association American Urological Association (AUA) – Candidate Member Other awards/ Accomplishments 2104 Henry Ford System wide Outstanding Fellow Award 2012 Resident of the year Henry Ford West Bloomfield Hospital. Robotics Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Omitting Outer Renorrhaphy During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy
    Henry Ford Health System Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons Clinical Research Medical Education Research Forum 2019 5-2019 Feasibility of Omitting Outer Renorrhaphy During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Sohrab Arora Henry Ford Health System, [email protected] Chandler Bronkema Henry Ford Health System James R. Porter Alexander Mottrie Mani Menon Henry Ford Health System, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/merf2019clinres Recommended Citation Arora, Sohrab; Bronkema, Chandler; Porter, James R.; Mottrie, Alexander; Menon, Mani; Rogers, Craig G.; Jeong, Wooju; Dasgupta, Prokar; Bhandari, Mahendra; and Abdollah, Firas, "Feasibility of Omitting Outer Renorrhaphy During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy" (2019). Clinical Research. 15. https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/merf2019clinres/15 This Poster is brought to you for free and open access by the Medical Education Research Forum 2019 at Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Clinical Research by an authorized administrator of Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons. Authors Sohrab Arora, Chandler Bronkema, James R. Porter, Alexander Mottrie, Mani Menon, Craig G. Rogers, Wooju Jeong, Prokar Dasgupta, Mahendra Bhandari, and Firas Abdollah This poster is available at Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons: https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/ merf2019clinres/15 Feasibility of omitting outer (cortical) renorrhaphy during robotic partial nephrectomy
    [Show full text]
  • Androgen Receptor Inactivation Induces Telomere DNA Damage, and Damage Response Inhibition Leads to Cell Death
    Henry Ford Health System Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons Urology Articles Urology 1-1-2019 Castration-resistant prostate cancer: Androgen receptor inactivation induces telomere DNA damage, and damage response inhibition leads to cell death. Vidyavathi Reddy Henry Ford Health System, [email protected] Asm Iskander Henry Ford Health System, [email protected] Clara Hwang Henry Ford Hospital, [email protected] George Divine Henry Ford Health System, [email protected] Mani Menon Henry Ford Health System, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/urology_articles Recommended Citation Reddy V, Iskander A, Hwang C, Divine G, Menon M, Barrack ER, Reddy GP, and Kim SH. Castration-resistant prostate cancer: Androgen receptor inactivation induces telomere DNA damage, and damage response inhibition leads to cell death. PLoS One 2019; 14(5):e0211090. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Urology at Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urology Articles by an authorized administrator of Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons. Authors Vidyavathi Reddy, Asm Iskander, Clara Hwang, George Divine, Mani Menon, Evelyn R. Barrack, Prem-Veer Reddy, and Sahn-Ho Kim This article is available at Henry Ford Health System Scholarly Commons: https://scholarlycommons.henryford.com/ urology_articles/24 RESEARCH ARTICLE Castration-resistant prostate cancer: Androgen receptor inactivation induces telomere
    [Show full text]