DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of the South Australian Marine Scalefish Fishery in 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of the South Australian Marine Scalefish Fishery in 2016 Assessment of the South Australian Marine Scalefish Fishery in 2016 MA Steer, AJ Fowler, R McGarvey, J Feenstra, EL Westlake, D Matthews, M Drew, PJ Rogers and J Earl SARDI Publication No. F2017/000427-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 974 SARDI Aquatics Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 January 2018 Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture Steer, M. et. al. (2018) MSF Assessment Report Assessment of the South Australian Marine Scalefish Fishery in 2016 Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture MA Steer, AJ Fowler, R McGarvey, J Feenstra, EL Westlake, D Matthews, M Drew, PJ Rogers and J Earl SARDI Publication No. F2017/000427-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 974 January 2018 II Steer, M. et. al. (2018) MSF Assessment Report This publication may be cited as: Steer, M.A., Fowler, A.J., McGarvey, R., Feenstra, J., Westlake, E.L., Matthews, D., Drew, M., Rogers, P.J. and Earl, J. (2018). Assessment of the South Australian Marine Scalefish Fishery in 2016. Report to PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2017/000427-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 974. 250pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5415 http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/research DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability and currency or otherwise. SARDI and its employees expressly disclaim all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. Use of the information and data contained in this report is at the user’s sole risk. If users rely on the information they are responsible for ensuring by independent verification its accuracy, currency or completeness. The SARDI Report Series is an Administrative Report Series which has not been reviewed outside the department and is not considered peer-reviewed literature. Material presented in these Administrative Reports may later be published in formal peer-reviewed scientific literature. © 2018 SARDI This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owner. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. SARDI Publication No. F2017/000427-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 974 Author(s): MA Steer, AJ Fowler, R McGarvey, J Feenstra, EL Westlake, D Matthews, M Drew, PJ Rogers and J Earl Reviewer(s): S Mayfield, TM Ward, C Noell (SARDI) and J Presser, K Rowling, J McPhail (PIRSA) Approved by: S Mayfield Science Leader - Fisheries Signed: Date: 16 January 2018 Distribution: PIRSA Fisheries and Aquaculture, SAASC Library, Parliamentary Library, State Library and National Library Circulation: Public Domain III Steer, M. et. al. (2018) MSF Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................................. IV ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................................... XII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY .......................................................................................................................... 6 1.3. MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.4. MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.5. HARVEST STRATEGIES ..................................................................................................................................... 8 1.6. FISHERY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ................................................................................................................ 8 1.7. ALLOCATION ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.8. STOCK STATUS CLASSIFICATION ....................................................................................................................... 9 2. FISHING FLEET DYNAMICS ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 11 2.2. METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.3. RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.3.1. Trends in Number of Active Licences ................................................................................................ 13 2.3.2. Trends in Commercial Catch.............................................................................................................. 13 2.3.3. Trends in Fishing Effort ...................................................................................................................... 15 2.4. DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................................................. 21 3. KING GEORGE WHITING STOCK ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................... 22 3.1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 22 3.1.1. Fishery ............................................................................................................................................... 23 3.1.2. Harvest Strategy ................................................................................................................................ 23 3.1.3. Management Regulations .................................................................................................................. 24 3.2. METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.1. Data Sources ..................................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.2. ‘WhitEst’ Fishery Model ..................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.3. Assessment of Fishery Performance ................................................................................................. 26 3.3. RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................................... 28 3.3.1. Commercial Fishery Statistics ............................................................................................................ 28 3.3.2. Fishery Performance .......................................................................................................................... 38 3.4. DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................................................. 39 3.4.1. Context of this Assessment ............................................................................................................... 39 3.4.2. Determination of Stock Status............................................................................................................ 40 3.4.3. Stock Status ....................................................................................................................................... 42 3.4.4. Assessment Uncertainties ................................................................................................................. 44 3.4.5. Future Work ....................................................................................................................................... 45 4. STOCK STATUS OF KEY MARINE SCALEFISH SPECIES ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VARIATION in SETTLEMENT and LARVAL DURATION of Klng GEORGE WHITING, SILLAGINODES PUNCTATA (SILLAGINIDAE), in SWAN BAY, VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 54(1): 281-296, 1994 VARIATION IN SETTLEMENT AND LARVAL DURATION OF KlNG GEORGE WHITING, SILLAGINODES PUNCTATA (SILLAGINIDAE), IN SWAN BAY, VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA Gregory P. Jenkins and Helen M. A. May ABSTRACT Otoliths were examined from late-stage larvae and juveniles of King George whiting, Sillaginodes punctata, collected from Swan Bay in spring 1989. Increments in otoliths of larval S. punctata are known to be formed daily. A transition in the microstructure of otoliths from late-stage larvae was apparently related to environmental changes associated with entry to Port Phillip Bay. The pattern of abundance of post-larvae of S. punctata in fortnightly samples supported the contention that the transition was formed immediately prior to "set- tlement" in seagrass habitats. Backcalculation to the otolith transition suggested that five cohorts had entered Swan Bay, each approximately 10 days apart, from late September to early November. Stability of this pattern for juveniles from sequential samples indicated that otolith increments continued to be formed daily in the juvenile stage. The pattern of settlement was consistent for two sites within Swan Bay. The larval phase of King George whiting settling in Port Phillip Bay was extremely long and variable, ranging from approximately 100 to 170 days. Age at settlement was more variable than length, and growth rate at settlement was I I extremely slow, approximately 0.06 mm ·d- • • Backcalculated hatching dates ranged from April to JUly. July. Increment widths in the larval stage suggest that growth slows after approxi- mately 45 to 75 days; beyond which individuals are in a slow growth, competent stage of 40 to 100 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region
    Marine Environment and Ecology Benthic Ecology Subprogram Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1 SARDI Research Report series No. 415 Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie SARDI Aquatic Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 December 2009 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 1 Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region Keith Rowling, Shirley Sorokin, Leonardo Mantilla and David Currie December 2009 SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 415 Prepared for the Department for Environment and Heritage 2 This Publication may be cited as: Rowling, K.P., Sorokin, S.J., Mantilla, L. & Currie, D.R. (2009) Marine Biodiversity of the Northern and Yorke Peninsula NRM Region. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2009/000531-1. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.sardi.sa.gov.au DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Chief of Division. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions. SARDI does not accept any liability for the contents of this report or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Congolli (Pseudaphritis Urvillii) and Australian Salmon (Arripis Truttaceus and A
    Inland Waters and Catchment Ecology Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong George Giatas and Qifeng Ye SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 858 SARDI Aquatics Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 September 2015 Giatas and Ye (2015) Diet of three fish species in the Coorong Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong George Giatas and Qifeng Ye SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 858 September 2015 II Giatas and Ye (2015) Diet of three fish species in the Coorong This publication may be cited as: Giatas, G.C. and Ye, Q. (2015). Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 858. 81pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/research DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Maryland's Coastal Bays and Atlantic Ocean Finfish
    Investigation of Maryland’s Coastal Bays and Atlantic Ocean Finfish Stocks 2014 Final Report Prepared by: Linda Barker, Steve Doctor, Carrie Kennedy, Gary Tyler, Craig Weedon, and Angel Willey Federal Aid Project No. F-50-R-23 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR Fish & Wildlife Service Division of Federal Assistance Region 5 Annual Report___X_____ Final Report (5-Year)_______ Proposal________ Grantee: Maryland Department of Natural Resources – Fisheries Service Grant No.: F-50-R Segment No.: 23 Title: Investigation of Maryland’s Coastal Bays and Atlantic Ocean Finfish Stocks Period Covered: January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 Prepared By: Carrie Kennedy, Principal Investigator, Manager Coastal Program Date Approved By: Tom O’Connell, Director, Fisheries Service Date Approved By: Anissa Walker, Appointing Authority Date Date Submitted: May 30, 2015 ____________ Statutory Funding Authority: Sport Fish Restoration X CFDA #15.605 State Wildlife Grants (SWG) Cooperative Management Act CFDA #15.634 Acknowledgements The Coastal Bays Fisheries Investigation has been sampling fishes in the Coastal Bays for 42 years. Although the survey began in 1972, it did not have dedicated funding until 1989. Consistent funding allowed staff to specifically dedicate time and make improvements to the sampling protocol that resulted in significant beneficial contributions to the fisheries of the Coastal Bays. We would like to thank the past and present staff that dedicated their careers to the Coastal Bays Fisheries Investigation for having the knowledge, initiative, and dedication to get it started and maintained. Additionally, staff of the Coastal Fisheries Program would like to thank all of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Fisheries Service employees who assisted with the operations, field work, and annual reports over the years whether it was for a day or a few months.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of the Proposed Geographe Bay Blue Swimmer and Sand Crab Managed Fishery
    Research Library Fisheries management papers Fisheries Research 8-2003 Management of the proposed Geographe Bay blue swimmer and sand crab managed fishery. Jane Borg Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/fr_fmp Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, and the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Borg, J. (2003), Management of the proposed Geographe Bay blue swimmer and sand crab managed fishery.. Department of Fisheries Western Australia, Perth. Report No. 170. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Fisheries Research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fisheries management papers by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MANAGEMENT OF THE PROPOSED GEOGRAPHE BAY BLUE SWIMMER AND SAND CRAB MANAGED FISHERY A management discussion paper By Jane Borg and Cathy Campbell FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PAPER NO. 170 Department of Fisheries 168 St. George's Terrace Perth WA 6000 August 2003 ISSN 0819-4327 Fisheries Management Paper No. 170 Management of the Proposed Geographe Bay Blue Swimmer and Sand Crab Managed Fishery August 2003 Fisheries Management Paper No. 170 ISSN 0819-4327 2 Fisheries Management Paper No. 170 CONTENTS OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lady Crab, Occurs Along in Nova Scotia They Occur in Several Other Coastal Areas the Eastern Seaboard of Including the Bay of Fundy and Minas Basin
    Moulted shells are found at Burntcoat Head. Ovalipes ocellatus Class: Malacostraca Order: Decapoda Family: Portunidae Genus: Ovalipes Distribution Crabs in the genus ovalipes In Canada there are disjunct populations in the Gulf of St. are distributed worldwide. Lawrence and the Northumberland Strait. The Northumberland This specific species, Strait is a tidal water body between Prince Edward Island and Ovalipes ocellatus, known as the coast of eastern New Brunswick and northern Nova Scotia. the lady crab, occurs along In Nova Scotia they occur in several other coastal areas the eastern seaboard of including the Bay of Fundy and Minas Basin. Most populations North America, from occur south of Cape Cod, Massachusetts and continue south Canada south to Florida. along the Atlantic coast. They converge with two other species of Ovalipes; O. stephenson and O. floridanus. Habitat They live in shallow coastal It is most often found in sandy substrates in quite shallow water, waters and off shore areas including mud banks sand bars. It may occur in surf zones with sandy bottoms. where there is strong wave action and constantly shifting sands. Food The lady crab feeds on live or decaying marine organisms such It is both a predator and a as fish, crabs, or clams. When fish or worms pass by, it comes scavenger. out of the sand and grabs the animal with its claws. Reproduction Courtship takes place The testes or ovaries are situated dorsally in the thorax. Testes between these crabs with open externally in the male near the basal segment of the last the male following and then pair of legs while the ovaries in the female open externally on holding on to a female.
    [Show full text]
  • Rearing Enhancement of Ovalipes Trimaculatus (Crustacea: Portunidae
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Rearing enhancement of Ovalipes trimaculatus (Crustacea: Portunidae) zoea I by feeding on Artemia persimilis nauplii enriched with alternative microalgal diets Antonela Martelli1,3*, Elena S. Barbieri1,3, Jimena B. Dima2 & Pedro J. Barón1 The southern surf crab Ovalipes trimaculatus (de Haan, 1833) presents a high potential for aquaculture. In this study, we analyze the benefts of diferent dietary treatments on its molt success and ftness of larval stages. Artemia persimilis nauplii were enriched with monospecifc (Nannochloropsis oculata, Tetraselmis suecica, Dunaliella salina, Isochrysis galbana and Chaetoceros gracilis) and multispecifc (Mix) microalgal diets twice a day over a 48-h period. Mean total length (TL), growth instar number (I) and gut fullness rate (GFR) of nauplii showed signifcant diferences between dietary treatments at several sampling times, optimal results being observed in those providing Mix. Artemia nauplii grown under most experimental dietary treatments reached the capture size limit for Ovalipes trimaculatus zoea I (700 µm) within 24 h. After that time interval, Mix-enriched nauplii were amongst those with higher protein contents. Ovalipes trimaculatus zoea I fed on Artemia nauplii enriched during 24 h under diferent dietary treatments showed signifcant diferences in survival, inter-molt duration, molting success to zoea II and motility. Optimal results were observed in zoea I fed on Mix-enriched Artemia nauplii. This work not only represents a frst step towards the dietary optimization for O. trimaculatus zoeae rearing but also provides the frst results on the use of enriched A. persimilis. Portunid crabs stand out as highly valued resources for fsheries and aquaculture because of their export potential and high nutritional value1.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet
    Illustration © R. Swainston/anima.net.au Information sheet Yellowfin whiting (Sillago schombergkii) Distribution Identification Yellowfin whiting (also known as western sand Adults have no distinguishing body markings and are whiting) are endemic to south-western Australia from best identified by their yellow ventral and anal fins Western Australia (Onslow) to South Australia (Gulf St and a weakly forked tail. Juveniles have faint black Vincent). WA and SA host separate breeding stocks. blotches on the body and may be confused with juvenile western trumpeter whiting. Stock structure and movement In WA, populations within the Gascoyne Coast Growth Bioregion and West Coast Bioregion are believed Can reach a maximum of 427 mm total length (TL) to have limited connectivity and so are regarded as and 12 years of age. Females and males attain separate stocks. sexual maturity at 2 years, at 200 and 190 mm TL, respectively. Females grow slightly larger than males. In the West Coast Bioregion, some fish live in estuaries for much the year, but these fish migrate Reproduction to sea to join their ocean-dwelling counterparts to Spawning typically occurs at water temperatures spawn in late spring/early summer. Hence, fish of 22-24 ºC. Spawning occurs August-December across the West Coast Bioregion belong to the same in northern areas (e.g. Shark Bay) and December- breeding stock (e.g. fish caught in the Peel-Harvey February in southern areas (e.g. Perth). Spawning Estuary are part of the same population as those in occurs over a longer period in northern areas Geographe Bay or Jurien Bay).
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Fishes of Sydney Harbour 2019
    Table of Fishes of Sydney Harbour 2019 Family Family/Com Species Species Common Notes mon Name Name Acanthuridae Surgeonfishe Acanthurus Eyestripe close s dussumieri Surgeonfish to southern li mit Acanthuridae Acanthurus Orangebloch close to olivaceus Surgeonfish southern limit Acanthuridae Acanthurus Convict close to triostegus Surgeonfish southern limit Acanthuridae Acanthurus Yellowmask xanthopterus Surgeonfish Acanthuridae Paracanthurus Blue Tang not included hepatus in species count Acanthuridae Prionurus Spotted Sawtail maculatus Acanthuridae Prionurus Australian Sawtail microlepidotus Ambassidae Glassfishes Ambassis Port Jackson jacksoniensis glassfish Ambassidae Ambassis marianus Estuary Glassfish Anguillidae Freshwater Anguilla australis Shortfin Eel Eels Anguillidae Anguilla reinhardtii Longfinned Eel Antennariidae Anglerfishes Antennarius Freckled Anglerfish southern limit coccineus Antennariidae Antennarius Giant Anglerfish close to commerson southen limit Antennariidae Antennarius Shaggy Anglerfish southern limit hispidus Antennariidae Antennarius pictus Painted Anglerfish Antennariidae Antennarius striatus Striate Anglerfish Table of Fishes of Sydney Harbour 2019 Antennariidae Histrio histrio Sargassum close to Anglerfish southen limit Antennariidae Porophryne Red-fingered erythrodactylus Anglerfish Aploactinidae Velvetfishes Aploactisoma Southern Velvetfish milesii Aploactinidae Cocotropus Patchwork microps Velvetfish Aploactinidae Paraploactis Bearded Velvetfish trachyderma Aplodactylidae Seacarps Aplodactylus Rock Cale
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Assessments for Multi-Species Fisheries In
    CM 2007/O:11 Resource assessments for multi-species fisheries in NSW, Australia: qualitative status determination using life history characteristics, empirical indicators and expert review. James Scandol and Kevin Rowling Wild Fisheries Program; Systems Research Branch Division of Science and Research; NSW Department of Primary Industries Cronulla Fisheries Centre; PO Box 21, Cronulla NSW 2230 Not to be cited without prior reference to the authors Abstract As the scope of fisheries management continues to broaden, there is increased pressure on scientific assessment processes to consider a greater number of species. This expanded list of species will inevitably include those with a range of life-history strategies, heterogeneous sources of information, and diverse stakeholder values. When faced with this challenge in New South Wales (Australia), the Department of Primary Industries developed systems and processes that scaled efficiently as the number of species requiring consideration increased. The key aspects of our approach are: • A qualitative determination of exploitation status based upon expert review. The current categories are: growth/recruitment overfished, fully fished, moderately fished, lightly fished, undefined and uncertain. • Application of management rules that require a Species Recovery Program should any species be determined to be overfished. • An emphasis on readily calculated empirical indicators (such as catch, catch-rates, length and age composition), rather than model-based estimates of biomass or fishing mortality. • Use of databases and electronic reporting systems to calculate empirical indicators based upon specified rules. Currently, there are 90 species considered with around six scientific and technical staff. These species were identified by commercial fishers as the important species from five multi-species and multi- method input-controlled fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • ILLEGAL FISHING Which Fish Species Are at Highest Risk from Illegal and Unreported Fishing?
    ILLEGAL FISHING Which fish species are at highest risk from illegal and unreported fishing? October 2015 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 4 METHODOLOGY 5 OVERALL FINDINGS 9 NOTES ON ESTIMATES OF IUU FISHING 13 Tunas 13 Sharks 14 The Mediterranean 14 US Imports 15 CONCLUSION 16 CITATIONS 17 OCEAN BASIN PROFILES APPENDIX 1: IUU Estimates for Species Groups and Ocean Regions APPENDIX 2: Estimates of IUU Risk for FAO Assessed Stocks APPENDIX 3: FAO Ocean Area Boundary Descriptions APPENDIX 4: 2014 U.S. Edible Imports of Wild-Caught Products APPENDIX 5: Overexploited Stocks Categorized as High Risk – U.S. Imported Products Possibly Derived from Stocks EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New analysis by World Wildlife Fund (WWF) finds that over 85 percent of global fish stocks can be considered at significant risk of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. This evaluation is based on the most recent comprehensive estimates of IUU fishing and includes the worlds’ major commercial stocks or species groups, such as all those that are regularly assessed by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Based on WWF’s findings, the majority of the stocks, 54 percent, are categorized as at high risk of IUU, with an additional 32 perent judged to be at moderate risk. Of the 567 stocks that were assessed, the findings show that 485 stocks fall into these two categories. More than half of the world’s most overexploited stocks are at the highest risk of IUU fishing. Examining IUU risk by location, the WWF analysis shows that in more than one-third of the world’s ocean basins as designated by the FAO, all of these stocks were at high or moderate risk of IUU fishing.
    [Show full text]