Coconut Grove Transit Circulator Services Technical Assistance Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
COCONUT GROVE TRANSIT CIRCULATOR SERVICES TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE STUDY Final Report March2002 Prepared for: MIAMI PARKING AUTHORITY Miami Parking Authority 190 N.E. 3"' Street Miami, Florida 33132 {305) 373-6789 www.miamiparking.com Executive Director: Arthur Noriega Director of Planning and Development: Juan C. Cueto Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) National Center for Transit Research (NCTR) University of South Florida College of Engineering 4202 E. Fowfer Avenue, CUT 100 Tampa, Florida 3362()-5375 (813) 974-3120 www.cutr.usf.edu Director, CUTR: Edward Mierzejewski, PhD, PE Director, NCTR: Joel Volinski Project Team: Victoria Perk Chris DeAnnuntis Bill Morris ------Coconut Grove Transit Circulator Services Study------ TABLE OF CONTENTS u.sr OF TABLES ••• •••••••••••••••••••••• •••••• •••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••• , ••••••••••• •••••••••••••• iv LIST OF FIGURES ••••••• •• ••••••••••••••• •••••• •• ••••••••••• ,,, •••••••••••••••••••••• , •••••••••••••••••• iv INTRODUtnON ••• 0 . I. 0 •••••• 0 • • 0. 0 0 •••••••• 0 •••• 0 0 ••• 0 ••••••••••••••••••• • 0 •• 0 • ••• 0 •• 0 ••••••••••• 0 ••• 0. 1 BACKGROUND • •• •• 00 •• 0 00 ••••••• 0 •• f ••••• 0 •• 0 •• • I ••••••••••••••••• 0 ••• 00 ••••• I •••• 0 ••• 0 •••• I ••• 1 Exlsn.NG MOT SERVICES IN COC~LIT GROVE ••••••••• •••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••• • 2 SUMMARY Of STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEW PROCESS •• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 5 CURRENT CONDmONS IN COCONUT GROVE •••••••• o o o •••••• o •• o o ••••••• o •••••••••• o • • o o. o o ••• 5 ExlSTlNG TRANSIT SERVICES • o •••• o o • •• • o •• • •• o. o •••••••••••••• o. o o •• o ••••• • • •••••••••••••••••• 7 NEW TAA.NSIT SERVICES •••• o •• • • •• o. o ••• o ••••• o ••••••••••• o o o •••• o •• o o •• o o ••••••••• o o o o •••• ••• 8 ALTERNATIVE ROUTE AUGNMEHTS fOR TRANSIT CIRCULATOR SERVICE IN COcoNUT GROVE ••• o oo ••••••••• o •••••••••• o o ••••••••••• o ••••• o • ••••••••• o ••••• o •••••••••• • o • •••• o •• 11 OESCRIPTlON OF AlTERNATIVES ••••••••••••••• ···~··········•oo••••••••••· ~· ··· · , o ••••••••••• 11 OPERATIONAl CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FoUR ALTERNATIVES •••• ••••••••••••••••• •••••••••• 13 RElATIONSHIP OF ALTERNATIVES WITH ExiSTING MDT METROBUS ROUTES ••••• ••••••••••••• 24 CoMPARISON OF CocONUT GROVE AI.TERNA TIVES TO MDT METROBUS AND METRORAIL SERVICES •••••••• 0 0. 0. 0 •• 0 0 • • 0 •• 0 ••• • ••• 0 . 0 ••••• 0 •••• 0 ••• 0 ••••••• 0. 0 ••••• I 0 0 •••••••••• 0. I. I 0 •• 25 RElATIONSHIP OF ALTERNATIVES WITH EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKING •• ••• ••••••••••••• 28 VEH1CLE TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS •••••••••••••• 0. 0 •• 0 ••• I •• 0 ••••••• 0 • •• 0 •• •••• • 00.0 0 • •• 0 ••• 0. 0 •••••••• 31 MINIBUS VERSUS FULL.. SIZE BIJSES •• 0 • ••••••• 0. 0 0 ••••••••••••••• 0 •• I I I 00 •••••••••• 00 I •••• • ••• 31 LOW·FLOOR BUSES VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BUSES ........................................... 31 CONVENTIONAL VERSUS ALTERNATIVE-FuEL VEHICI.£5 ... ..................................... 32 THE BASICS OF ELECTRIC VEHIO.ES • o •• o o •••••••• •••••••• o o. o•o •• • o• •••••• o ••• , •• o •• o. o •• o ••• 32 PURE ELECTRIC$ VERSUS HYBRID ELECTRICS •••• o o. o ••• o ••• oou • • 10 • • ••• o• ••• o . ,. o• •••••••••• 34 LESSONS lEARNED IN THE APPUCATION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ................. 36 FACUTIES FOR MAINTAINING AND STORING ELECTRIC VEHIO.ES ............................. 38 WHERE ElECTRic VEHIO.ES MAKE THE Mosr SENSE ···· ···o ······•oo· ·~·· II •• ·· o···· ••o••· .. 40 FUNDING SOURCES, •••••••••• o•. o o o, , o •• , ••• o ••••• o •• , •••••• o ••••••• o ••••••••••••• • o ••••• o. o o . o. o ••••• 43 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFT RANSPORTATION (FDOn FUNDING PROGRAMS .................. 43 THE FtORIDA TRANSIT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM .............................................. 49 FEDE.RAl TRANSPORTATION FUNDING PROGRAM$ ............................................. 50 OTHER FEDERAL FuNDING PROGRAMS THAT SUPPORT TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS .......... 55 Fln11/ Report T11ble of eotm.nts ------Coconut Grove Transit Circulator Se111ices Study------ LOCAL SOURCES OF FUNDING ••••••••• I I ••• 0. 0 •• 0. 0 •••••••••••• I ••• 0 •••••••••••••••• 0 0 ••• 0 •• 0. 56 OTHER SOURCES OF fUNDING FOR ElEcTRIC 0RCULATOR SERVICES ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 64 OPTIONS FOR OPERATING THE CIRCULATOR SERVICES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••• 67 PoTENTIAl SERVICE PROVIDERS. 0 ••••••••••••••••••••• I ••••••••••••••• I ••••••• 0 0 0 •••••••••• I I 67 WHICH AGENCY SHOULD PROVIDE THE SERVICE? ••• , ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 69 CoNCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDAnoNs •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 73 APPENDIX A: MDT ROUTE MAPS ••••.•.•••••••••••••••••••••.••••••.••••••••••••••..••••••••••.•••• 77 APPENDIX B: STAKEHOLDER lNTERVIfW DISCUSSION GUIDE •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 87 lisT OF TABLES TABLE 1: METRORAIL STATtON$ SERVING COCONUT GROVE ••• ·•••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 2 TABLE 2 : METROBUS ROUTES SERVING COCONUT GROVE .............................................. o 3 TABLE 3: OTHER CHARACTERISTICS OF METROBUS ROUTES SERVING COCONUT GROVE •••••••••••••••• 3 TABLE 4: OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS- COCONUT GROVE TRANSIT SERVICE ALTERNATIVES .• oo. o•••• .. o• •••••••••• o••.•. o.••• o. o••••••••..•••••.•••••••.••.•••. ••1 ••••••• 23 TABLE 5: EsTIMATED ANNUAL OPERATING COST- COCONUT GROVE TRANSIT SERVICE ALTERNATIVES •••••••••••••••••.• o ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 23 TABLE 6: COMPARISON OF COCONUT GROVE AlTERNATIVES AND MDT SERVICE ••••••••••••• •••••••••• 27 TABLE 7: COMPARISON OF COSTS- CONVENTIONAL VERSUS ELECTRIC MINIBUSES •••••••••••••••••••• 35 liST OF FIGURES ROUTE 1 {RECOMMENDED): DOUGLAS ROAD METRORAIL STATION TO COCONUT GROVE METRORAIL STATION VIA GRAND AVENUE ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• I I ••••••• • II. OliO •••••••• 15 ROUTE 2: DoUGLAS ROAD METRORAILSTATION TO COCONUT GROVE METRORAILSTATION VIA BIRO ROAD ························••o••·••••••o•••··········•••···~··~··••···················~···17 ROUTE 3: UNIVERSITY Of MIAMI RESIDENCE HALL TO CENTER GROVE VIA GRAND AVENUE •••••••••••• 19 ROUTE 4: VIZCAYA METRORAILSTATION TO CENTER GROVE VIA nGERTAIL AVENUE ••••••••• ••••••••• 21 ---- --Coconut Grove Transit Circulator Services Study------ I NTRODUCTION This report summarizes the tasks undertaken for the Coconut Grove Transit Circuli/tor Services Technical Assistilnce Study, prepared by the Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR) for the Miami Parking Authority. Alternative route options are presented for the Coconut Grove area along with recommendations for the implementation of service. Background The community of COconut Grove lies just south of Downtown Miami, and contains an eclectic mix of restaurants, shops, parks, cultural activities, hotels, residences, and residents. The major shopping areas are located In the village center at the junction of COcowalk, which houses an AMC movie theater, 38 various shops, and restaurants, and the Streets of Mayfair, which holds 228,000 square feet of shopping and dining within 2.5 city blocks. Additional shops and restaurants, Including many with sidewalk seating, are located south and west of Cocowalk along Main Highway and cross-streets such as Commodore Plaza. Coconut Grove is also a dense residential area, with sections of affluent housing as we.ll as sections with a low-Income, minority population (West Grove). Housing ranges from single family homes to rental properties to high-rise condominiums overlooking Biscayne Bay. The area can be divided into geographic sections: North Grove, Center Grove, South Grove, and West Grove. The business district is a part of Center Grove. Issues have been identified with parking in the commercial area that result in significant traffic congestion, air and noise pollution from vehicles, and conflicts with pedestrians. The area is also known for its ample nightlife, which is evident mostly on weekends, but also during the week to some degree. On-street, metered parking is available, but visitors to the business district often seem to have a difficult time finding a place to park their vehicles on the street. A parking garage located at the intersection of Oak Avenue and Mary Street, only a few blocks fTom the heart of the business district Is often underutllized. Another issue that affects traffic circulation In the Grove Is the high level of through-traffic, especially during peak morning and afternoon hours, as well as weekend nights. The corridor of Main Highway to McFarlane Road to Bayshore Drive is utilized as an alternative to U.S. 1 as a north-south route to and from the Downtown Miami/Brickell area and the residential areas south of Coconut Grove such as Coral Gables and Pinecrest. Flmll Report Introduction ----------------~.. ~---- ----------- ------Coconut Grove Transit Circulator services Study·------ There are a number of potential markets that can be served by transit drculator services in Coconut Grove. A desire exists .to offer internal drculation within Coconut Grove and its business district to provide Grove residents and its visitors alike an easy and convenient way to patronize the area's shopping, dining, and entertainment opportunities. In addition, better access to the Metrorail stations that serve Coconut Grove can serve the dual purpose of allowing more visitors to access the area without their cars and of providing all of Coconut Grove's residents and employees with high quality access to the regional Miami-Dade Transit (MDn system for work, school, and other trips. It is