HOW EUROPEAN IS BULGARIA? the Case of Party System and Politics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
HOW EUROPEAN IS BULGARIA? The Case of Party System and Politics By Isabella Manassarian Submitted to Central European University Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Professor Anton Pelinka CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2007 Abstract The aim of this thesis is to depict the level of Europeanization of the Bulgarian party politics. It was done by analyzing five different variables: 1. the nature of the electoral system itself, 2. voter turnouts in national parliamentary elections, 3. party-based Euroscepticism, 4. the nature of ethnic politics, and 5. the existence of ‘extreme trends’ in party politics. The situation in Bulgaria with regards to each of those is compared to that of Western Europe on the one hand and CEE on the other. The basic research question of this thesis is if the Bulgarian party system and politics does fall into the ‘Western’, i.e. Europeanized camp or not. The answer is provided on a ‘more-or-less’ continuum due to the complexity of the issue. An examination of each of the variables chosen has revealed that overall the case of Bulgaria is very unique. It is neither fully ‘Europeanized’, nor is it typically ‘Eastern’. Only in the case of the nature of the electoral systems, Bulgaria has displayed ‘Westernization’. With regards to the other four variables, one could notice that the various aspects of each of them show different trends in terms of their level of Europeanization, with some demonstrating typically ‘Western’, while others truly ‘Eastern’ perspectives, yet others proved to have the mixture of the features of the two. Keywords: Europeanization, Westernization, Bulgarian party politics, voter turnouts, electoral systems, party-based Euroscepticism, ethnic politics, right-wing extremism CEU eTD Collection i Acknowledgements First and foremost, I am grateful to my parents for their moral support during the process of researching and writing. Their advice and comments, as well as their assistance in organizing the personal interviews, helped me realize the ideas behind this project. I am deeply indebted to Dr. Levente Littvay for his constructive and critical comments on my drafts, as well as his patience in helping me code the quantitative model used in this thesis. My thanks extend to David Ridout for helping me polish the rough draft of the thesis. I am grateful to the Bulgarian students in CEU with whom I had elaborate discussions on the topic and who helped me in various translations that were used in this thesis. I would like to also thank Cristian Cercel for the time he took in giving me feedback on the comparative aspects of the thesis. And last, but not least, I want to express my utmost gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Anton Pelinka, for the help, guidance, and support he offered during the entire research process, as well as for his patience in reading all the chapters of the thesis, and his highly useful feedback. CEU eTD Collection ii Table of Contents 1. Introduction................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Defining the concepts.............................................................................................................................4 1.2 Methodology..........................................................................................................................................6 2. Background information ............................................................................................................................9 2.1 Legal Framework...................................................................................................................................9 2.2 Historical Overview.............................................................................................................................13 2.3 Formation of the Current Party Politics................................................................................................16 3. The electoral system .................................................................................................................................21 4. Voter turnouts in national elections .........................................................................................................24 5. Euroscepticism..........................................................................................................................................31 5.1 Academic deliberations........................................................................................................................31 5.2 The case of Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................36 6. Ethnic politics ...........................................................................................................................................43 6.1 Comparative elements..........................................................................................................................45 6.2 The case of Slovakia.............................................................................................................................48 6.3 The case of Romania............................................................................................................................48 6.4 MRF as an ethnic formation in Bulgaria...............................................................................................49 6.5 MRF as a political party.......................................................................................................................51 6.6 Ethnic political parties in a comparative perspective ............................................................................53 7. Extremism.................................................................................................................................................58 7.1 The terms and the grounds for comparison ...........................................................................................58 7.2 Extremism in Bulgaria: The Coalition Attack........................................................................................60 7.3 Pan-European comparative perspective................................................................................................64 7.3.1 Romania.......................................................................................................................................65 7.3.2 Poland..........................................................................................................................................66 7.3.3 Slovakia .......................................................................................................................................66 7.3.4 France ..........................................................................................................................................67 7.3.5 Austria..........................................................................................................................................67 7.3.6 Other cases...................................................................................................................................68 7.3.7 Comparative assessment of right-wing radical parties in Europe....................................................69 CEU eTD Collection 8. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................72 Appendix 1....................................................................................................................................................80 Interview Summaries..................................................................................................................................80 Agop Garabedyan..................................................................................................................................80 Anastasia Moser....................................................................................................................................84 Ivan Atanasov Kolchakov......................................................................................................................87 Kostadin Paskalev.................................................................................................................................90 Marin Lessenski....................................................................................................................................93 Stanimir Ilchev......................................................................................................................................97 iii Stanislav Stanilov................................................................................................................................102 Tchetin Kazak.....................................................................................................................................105 Vasil Garnizov ....................................................................................................................................108 Appendix 2..................................................................................................................................................113 Electoral Systems.....................................................................................................................................113