DOCSLIB.ORG

Challenging Khmer Citizenship: Minorities, the State, and the International Community in Cambodia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Challenging Khmer Citizenship: Minorities, the State, and the International Community in Cambodia Challenging Khmer Citizenship: Minorities, the State, and the International Community in Cambodia Stefan Ehrentraut Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften Eingereicht im März 2013 an der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Potsdam Betreut von Prof. Dr. Heinz Kleger This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License: Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 3.0 Germany To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/ Published online at the Institutional Repository of the University of Potsdam: URL http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2014/7035/ URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-70355 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-70355 Contents 1. The Incomplete Internationalization of Liberal Multiculturalism ....................... 1 1.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Research Design and Methodology .................................................................................. 4 1.3. Multiculturalism and Liberal Values ................................................................................ 7 1.4. Liberal Limits of Multiculturalism .................................................................................... 9 1.5. Conservative Multiculturalism ....................................................................................... 10 1.6. Minority Rights as Response to State Nation-Building .................................................. 12 1.7. Minority Categories in the West .................................................................................... 12 1.8. Preconditions of Liberal Multiculturalism in the West ................................................. 14 1.9. Assessing Preconditions outside the West .................................................................... 16 1.10. Partial Internationalization of Multiculturalism: “Indigenous Peoples” ...................... 17 1.11. Internationalization Inconsistent, Unstable, and Unsustainable? ................................ 22 2. Cultural Diversity and Citizenship in Cambodia ....................................................... 26 2.1. Categorizing Cambodia’s Cultural Diversity: Polyethnic and Multinational ............... 26 2.1.1. The Chinese ............................................................................................................ 29 2.1.2. The Vietnamese ...................................................................................................... 30 2.1.3. The Cham and Cambodia’s Muslims ..................................................................... 32 2.1.4. Highland Peoples and the Lao ................................................................................ 34 2.1.5. Small Scale of Minority Challenges to State Authority .......................................... 40 2.1.6. Absence of Assertive Minority Rights Claims ........................................................ 41 2.1.7. Absence of Willingness to Accommodate Minority Rights Claims ...................... 45 2.2. Independent Cambodia and the Emergence of the ‘Khmer Citizen’ ............................ 48 2.2.1. Post-Independence Colonization of Highland Peoples .......................................... 50 2.2.2. Minorities under the Khmer Republic .................................................................. 53 2.2.3. Minority Destruction during the Khmer Rouge .................................................... 54 2.2.4. Subsiding of Nationalist Violence under the PRK and SOC .................................. 56 2.2.5. Contestations of Vietnamese’ Legal Status within UN Peace Initiatives ............. 57 2.3. Ethnic Minorities and Khmer Citizenship under the New Constitution ...................... 59 2.3.1. Khmer Insecurity .................................................................................................... 61 2.3.2. Neo-Patrimonial Governance ................................................................................ 63 2.3.3. Immigration and Nationality Laws: From Foreigners to Citizens? ..................... 67 3. Perpetually Temporary: Citizenship and Ethnic Vietnamese ............................. 71 3.1. The Prospect for Citizenship .......................................................................................... 71 3.2. Low Level of Institutionalization ................................................................................... 72 3.3. Contested (Co-) Habitation Histories: ‘New’ and ‘Old’ Vietnamese ............................. 73 3.4. Detached from Land and Citizenship – Living on the Water ....................................... 77 3.5. Livelihoods Limited by Law ............................................................................................ 78 3.6. Factors Constraining Khmer Language Acquisition and Use ....................................... 79 3.7. Factors Constraining Participation in Public Education ............................................... 80 3.8. Exclusion from Local Governance .................................................................................. 82 3.9. Few Benefits from Development and Poverty Reduction ............................................. 85 3.10. Obstacles to Ethnic Vietnamese’ Inclusion: the ‘Vietnamese Threat’ .......................... 86 3.11. Why Ethnic Chinese are Citizens and Ethnic Vietnamese are not .............................. 88 3.12. Compensation for Historical and Contemporary Injustice .......................................... 88 i 3.13. Integration into What? Conceptions of Khmer National Identity ................................ 89 3.14. The Dynamics of Party Politics ....................................................................................... 90 3.15. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 91 4. Facets of Failure: International Indigenous Rights Promotion ........................... 94 4.1. International Support to the Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) ............................... 94 4.1.1. The UNDP’s Highland Peoples Program ................................................................ 95 4.1.2. Diversity-Friendly Rhetoric amid Growing Challenges ....................................... 99 4.1.3. Attempting to Incorporate ILO Indigenous Rights Standards via the IMC ........ 101 4.2. The New Land Law and Nominally Improved Legal Protection ................................ 103 4.2.1. Misrecognizing Highland Peoples as Backward Khmer Entities ....................... 105 4.2.2. Land Law Implementation Challenges ................................................................. 108 4.2.3. Conserving Collectivist Communities .................................................................. 110 4.2.4. ADB-Support for ‘Indigenous Peoples/Ethnic Minority Issues’ ......................... 113 4.3. UNDP Access to Justice and Conservative Multicollectivism ....................................... 116 4.3.1. ‘Impunity, Corruption, Power of Position … De Facto Law of the Country’ ....... 119 4.3.2. Fabricating Traditions and Proposing Legends for Legislation ......................... 121 4.3.3. Documenting Ancient Past and Fixed Rules as Approach to Law-Making ....... 126 4.4. Why the International Attempt to Promote Indigenous Rights Failed ...................... 130 5. Decentralization and Indigenous Peoples’ Empowerment ............................... 136 5.1. Cambodia’s Decentralization Reform .......................................................................... 139 5.2. International Support to Decentralization: RILGP ..................................................... 140 5.3. Indigenous Development Priorities and Negative Impacts ........................................ 142 5.4. Commune Councils and Land Conflict ......................................................................... 146 5.5. The Significance of Draft Rights in a Predatory State ................................................. 147 5.6. Engineering Consent and Institutionalizing Misrepresentation ................................ 148 5.7. Mainstreaming Indigenous Peoples Instead of Indigenous Rights ............................ 150 5.8. The Unequal Benefits of Standardized Participation .................................................. 152 5.9. Expanding the Scope of Unmade Agreements and Broken Promises ....................... 153 5.10. Capacity Building and Discontinued Institutions ........................................................ 153 5.11. Monitoring the Other Way ........................................................................................... 154 5.12. Conflict-Resolution or Conflict-Creation? .................................................................... 155 5.13. A Strategy of Avoiding Safeguard Obligations ............................................................. 156 5.14. Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 157 6. Khmer Citizenship and Highland Peoples – Voices from the Field ................. 160 6.1. Self-Identification and Identification by Others .......................................................... 160 6.2. Separateness vs. Integration ........................................................................................ 162 6.3. In-Migration
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Islam at the Margins: the Muslims of Indochina
    CIAS Discussion Paper No.3 Islam at the Margins: The Muslims of Indochina Edited by OMAR FAROUK Hiroyuki YAMAMOTO 2008 Center for Integrated Area Studies, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan Islam at the Margins: The Muslims of Indochina 1 Contents Preface ……………………………………………………………………3 Hiroyuki YAMAMOTO Introduction ……………………………………………………………...5 OMAR FAROUK The Cham Muslims in Ninh Thuan Province, Vietnam ………………7 Rie NAKAMURA Bani Islam Cham in Vietnam ………………………………………….24 Ba Trung PHU The Baweans of Ho Chi Minh City ……………………………………34 Malte STOKHOF Dynamics of Faith: Imam Musa in the Revival of Islamic Teaching in Cambodia ………59 MOHAMAD ZAIN Bin Musa The Re-organization of Islam in Cambodia and Laos………………..70 OMAR FAROUK The Chams and the Malay World …………………………………….86 Kanji NISHIO Notes on the Contributors……………………………………………...94 Workshop Program …………………………………………………....96 CIAS Discussion Paper No.3 © Center for Integrated Area Studies, Kyoto University Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto-shi, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan TEL: +81-75-753-9603 FAX: +81-75-753-9602 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cias.kyoto-u.ac.jp March, 2008 2 CIAS Discussion Paper No.3 Preface I think it would be no exaggeration to suggest that Southeast Asian nations are boom- ing, not only because of their rapid economic development but also because of their long experiences of maintaining harmony and tolerance between the diverse ethnic and religious components of their populations. The Southeast Asian Muslims, for example, once re- garded as being peripheral to the world of Islam, are now becoming recognized as model Muslim leaders with exceptional abilities to manage difficult tasks such as their own coun- try‟s economic development, the Islamic financial system, democratization and even aero- nautics.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam Detained Khmer-Krom Youth for Distributing the UN DRIP
    KKF’s Report April 16, 2021 Vietnam Detained Khmer-Krom Youth for Distributing the UN DRIP On Thursday, September 13, 2007, the General Assembly voted to adopt the United Nations Declarations on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UN DRIP). As a member state, Vietnam signed to adopt this crucial and historical document. Since signing to the adoption of the UN DRIP, Vietnam has continued to deny the existence of the indigenous peoples within its border. Vietnam has labeled the indigenous peoples as the “ethnic minority.” The Khmer-Krom people, the indigenous peoples of the Mekong Delta, have been living on their ancestral lands for thousands of years before the Vietnamese people came to live in the region. Lacking recognition as the indigenous peoples, the Khmer-Krom people have not enjoyed the fundamental rights enshrined in the UN DRIP. Instead of trying to protect and promote the fundamental rights of the indigenous peoples, Vietnam has tried to use all the tactics to make the indigenous peoples invisible in their homeland by not recognizing their true identity. The Khmer-Krom people are not allowed to identify themselves as Khmer-Krom, but being labeled as “Khmer Nam Bo.” Moreover, even Vietnam signed to adopt UN DRIP, but Vietnam has not translated the UN DRIP to the indigenous language and distributed the UN DRIP freely to indigenous peoples. Vietnam is a one-party communist state. Vietnam does not allow freedom of association. As a non- profit organization based in the United States to advocate for the fundamental rights of the voiceless Khmer-Krom in the Mekong Delta, the Khmers Kampuchea-Krom Federation (KKF) has not allowed operating in Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • New Beginnings
    New Beginnings Refugee Stories - Nelson A Snapshot of Success NEW BEGINNINGS Refugee Stories - Nelson First Published 2012 Nelson Multicultural Council 4 Bridge Street, Nelson PO Box 264, Nelson 7040 ISBN: 978-0-473-21735-8 Copy writing by Alison Gibbs Copy edited by Claire Nichols, Bob Irvine Designed and typeset by Revell Design - www.revelldesign.co.nz Printed by Speedyprint - www.speedyprint.co.nz Contents INTRODUCTION ...................................................................1 Van Ro Hlawnceu Mal Sawm Cinzah REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT IN NEW ZEALAND ..........2 Van Hlei Sung Lian ............................................................ 11 REFUGEE COMMUNITIES IN NELSON ..........................3 THE ETHNIC COMMUNITIES IN NELSON ................. 12 REFUGEE PROFILES ............................................................4 Burma .................................................................................... 12 Beda and Chandra Dahal .................................................4 Burmese ................................................................................ 12 Trang Lam ...............................................................................5 Chin ........................................................................................ 12 Theresa Zam Deih Cin .........................................................5 Zomi Innkuan ...................................................................... 13 Govinda (Tika) Regmi..........................................................6 Kayan ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity and Forest Resource Use and Management
    Page 1 of 11 ETHNICITY AND FOREST RESOURCE USE AND MANAGEMENT IN CAMBODIA BACKGROUND The Community Forestry Working Group established a typological framework to examine the inter-related issues of ecology, tenure, and ethnicity in relation to forest resource perspectives, use and management by rural communities in Cambodia. The typology will serve as a base of knowledge and documentation and as a conceptual framework for understanding community resource use. This will be useful for defining appropriate objectives, strategies, and methodologies to support community forestry development interventions. Specifically, understanding and describing the three underlying typological topics (tenure, ethnicity, ecology) will be helpful for: Establishing a framework for better identification and understanding of existing community forestry activities in Cambodia; A possible identification of appropriate places or regions where community forestry would be relevant and useful for sustainable forest management and for improvement of people's livelihoods; A useful instrument to design programs in a given region with community involvement. INTRODUCTION The population of Cambodia was estimated to be 11,437,656 in 1998. This population consists of different ethnic groups, including Khmer, Cham, Vietnamese, Chinese and hill tribes. Ethnic groups in Cambodian society possess a number of economic and demographic commonalties. For example, minority ethnic villages are more common among the poorest than among the richest quintile of villages (5.3 percent versus 3.2 percent) ( Ministry of Planning, 1999) . While commonalties exist, ethnic groups in Cambodia also preserve differences in their social and cultural institutions. The major differences among the various ethnic groups lie in historical, social organization, language, custom, habitant, belief and religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Article in A
    yber C yberO rient, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 2021 , pp. 259-289 Emerging Islamic Representations in the Cambodian Muslim Social Media Scene: Complex Divides and Muted Debates Zoltan Pall Austrian Academy of Sciences Alberto Pérez Pereiro National University of Singapore Abstract: This article explores the characteristics and structure of the Cambodian Muslim social media scene and considers what they tell us about the sociopolitical setting of the country’s Muslim minority. It focuses on how the relationship between Islamic actors of the Cambodian Muslim minority, that is, groups, movements and institutions, and their offline environment shape their online representations and proselytization activities. It particularly considers the observation that theological debate is almost absent in this Islamic social media scene compared to that of other Southeast Asian Muslim societies and attempts to find answers to the question of why this is the case. The article particularly examines the Facebook pages of various Islamic groups and explains the sociopolitical factors and language politics that inform the ways in which they formulate the contents and style of their posts. It shows how the close connections between the political and the religious fields in an authoritarian setting, where the state strongly discourages social discord, have the effect of largely muting debates on social media. Zoltan Pall, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, 1200 Hollandstraße Austria. 11-13, E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Cambodia, Islam, social media, divides Introduction Corresponding author: The multiplicity of actors within Cambodia’s Muslim minority has led to competing efforts to define what a good Muslim is – efforts that are now increasingly made on social media.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bunong of Cambodia Maintaining Identity in a Changing World the Bunong People of Cambodia Are a People Under Siege
    A POWERFUL VOICE FOR LIFESAVING ACTION The Bunong of Cambodia Maintaining Identity in a Changing World The Bunong people of Cambodia are a people under siege. One of several hill tribe groups that inhabit the Cambodia-Laos-Vietnam border highlands, the Bunong (also referred to as the Phnong) lead a precarious existence in their traditional forest homeland in the highlands of eastern Cambodia. Survivors of the wars that ravaged Southeast Asia in the 1970s, the Bunong today face new internal and outside forces that threaten their continued existence. But the Bunong are not without friends. Refugees International (RI), a 28-year-old organization that provides effective solutions to refugee crises, has worked assiduously in recent years on behalf of the Bunong. Lionel Rosenblatt, Refugees International’s President Emeritus, became aware of the Bunong’s plight when he found members of the group going home in a UN convoy in 1999. The Bunong and other indigenous groups were among the last of 250,000 refugees returning to their homes in Cambodia and they received far less assistance from the UN than those who had been repatriated earlier when the budget had been more generous. With advice from the Bunong and Rosenblatt’s guidance, Refu- gees International has focused attention on specific areas that can help the Bunong maintain their ethnic identity while adapting to the realities of the 21st century. These areas include education, health care, the promotion of traditional handicrafts, and helping the Bunong find their own political voice. RI has also played a major role in resurrecting traditional Bunong weaving.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework
    DRAFT CAMBODIA SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE AND ECOTOURISM PROJECT (CSLEP) INDIGENOUS PEOPLES PLANNING FRAMEWORK Prepared for: THE WORLD BANK GROUP 1818 H STREET NW WASHINGTON, DC, USA 20433 Prepared by: Ministry of Environment (MOE) & Ministry of Rural Development (MRD) March 2019 DRAFT CONTENTS List of Acronyms ................................................................................................. 3 PREFACE ............................................................................................................. 4 PURPOSE OF THE FRAMEWORK ..................................................................... 5 PROJECT OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................ 5 PROJECT COMPONENTS................................................................................... 5 OVERVIEW OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN CAMBODIA ................................ 13 RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND REGULATIONS .............................. 18 Cambodia Policies, Laws, Rules and Regulations Applicable to IPs ....................18 Relevant International Agreements Cambodia Entered .........................................19 World Bank’s Operational Policy: Indigenous People (OP 4.10) ...........................20 Gap Analysis .............................................................................................................20 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT, MONITORING, GRIEVANCE MECHANISM ...................................................................................................... 21 Implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services in Mondulkiri
    © WWF-Cambodia THIS PROJECT IS CO-FUNDED BY USAID AND EU REPORT KH 2016 Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services in Mondulkiri: Outcomes and Recommendations for Sustainable and Inclusive Land Use Planning in Cambodia © Sam Ath Chhith / WWF-Cambodia © Sam Lead authors: Karina Watkins; Chansopheaktra Sovann; Luke Brander; and Baromey Neth. Lead editors: Nirmal Bhagabati; Emily McKenzie; Lucy Emerton; Maelle Pelisson; Coline Ganz; and Kimheak Chhay. This study was made possible thanks to funding from the European Union and the USAID. WWF Cambodia would like to thank the Royal University of Phnom Penh for carrying out the spatial mapping and policy analysis, in particular Chansopheaktra Sovann, Baromey Neth, Kimsreng Choeun; Phanith Chou, Sereivathanakreasey Hoy, Vin Spoann and technical assistance was provided by Chhengngunn Aing. We would also like to thank Luke Brander for carrying out the economic valuation. The report benefited from valuable comments and edits from Nirmal Bhagabati (WWF-US) and Emily McKenzie (WWF). We would also like to thank all participants who joined us in the stakeholder workshops, including representatives from: the National Government, Mondulkiri Provincial Administrations, Provincial InVEST Working Group, the Royal University of Agriculture, NGOs and the private sector. WWF Disclaimer: This report draws on work from a number of sources and has not undergone a full academic peer review. Views or opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily represent those of the WWF network or other organizations involved in contributing to the report and contributing authors will not be liable for damages of any kind arising from the use of this report. Published: September 2016 by © WWF Cambodia Please refer to this publication as follows: Watkins, K., C.
    [Show full text]
  • Crafting Laos and Cambodia the CREATIVE RESOURCE GUIDE: RESOURCE the CREATIVE the CREATIVE RESOURCE GUIDE Crafting Andcambodia Laos the Creative Resource Guide
    Crafting Laos and Cambodia THE CREATIVE RESOURCE GUIDE: RESOURCE THE CREATIVE CRAFTING LAOS AND CAMBODIA CRAFTING LAOS THE CREATIVE RESOURCE GUIDE RESOURCE THE CREATIVE II The Creative Resource Guide: Crafting Laos and Cambodia CRAFTING LAOS AND CAMBODIA CRAFTING LAOS THE CREATIVE RESOURCE GUIDE RESOURCE THE CREATIVE IV THE CREATIVE RESOURCE GUIDE: Crafting Laos and Cambodia The Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) promotes understanding, Published by: strengthens relationships and facilitates cooperation among Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) the people, institutions and organisations of Asia and Europe. 31 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119595 ASEF enhances dialogue, enables exchanges and encourages T: +65 6874 9700 collaboration across the thematic areas of culture, F: +65 6872 1135 education, governance, economy, sustainable development, www.ASEF.org public health and media. ASEF is an intergovernmental not-for-profit organisation Series Editor located in Singapore. Founded in 1997, it is the only institution of the Asia-Europe Ms Valentina RICCARDI (ASEF) Meeting (ASEM). ASEF runs more than 25 projects a year, consisting of around 100 activities, mainly conferences, seminars, workshops, lectures, publications, Researcher and online platforms, together with about 150 partner organisations. Each year Magali An BERTHON over 3,000 Asians and Europeans participate in ASEF’s activities, and much wider audiences are reached through its various events, networks and web-portals. Design Inksurge culture360.ASEF.org is a portal initiated by the Asia-Europe All rights reserved © Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF), May 2019 Meeting (ASEM) and managed by the Culture Department at the Download from culture360.ASEF.org Asia- Europe Foundation (ASEF). culture360.ASEF.org aims to stimulate the cultural engagement between Asia and Europe All rights reserved © Cover photo credit: and enhance greater understanding between the two regions.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Cambodia's Highlanders
    1 1 CAMBODIA’S HIGHLANDERS Land, Livelihoods, and the Politics of Indigeneity Jonathan Padwe Throughout Southeast Asia, a distinction can be made between the inhabitants of lowland “state” societies and those of remote upland areas. This divide between hill and valley is one of the enduring social arrangements in the region—one that organizes much research on Southeast Asian society (Scott 2009). In Cambodia, highland people number some 200,000 individuals, or about 1.4 percent of the national population of approximately 15 million (IWGIA 2010). Located in the foothills of the Annamite Mountains in Cambodia’s northeast highlands, in the Cardamom Mountains to the southwest and in several other small enclaves throughout the country, Cambodia’s highland groups include, among others, the Tampuan, Brao, Jarai, Bunong, Kuy, and Poar. These groups share in common a distinction from lowland Khmer society based on language, religious practices, livelihood practices, forms of social organization, and shared histories of marginalization. This chapter provides an overview of research and writ- ing about key issues concerning Cambodia’s highlanders. The focus is on research undertaken since the 1992–1993 United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC), when an improved security situation allowed for a resumption of research with and about highland people. Important areas of concern for research on the highlands have included questions about highlanders’ experience of war and genocide, environmental knowledge, access to land and natural resources and problems of “indigeneity” within the politics of identity and ethnicity in Cambodia. Early ethnography of the highlands The earliest written records of highland people in the region are ninth- to twelfth-century inscriptions from the Po Nagar temple near present-day Phan Rang, in Vietnam, which describe the conquests of Cham rulers “against the Radé, the Madas [Jarai], and other barbarians” (Schweyer 2004, 124).
    [Show full text]
  • Submission on Self-Determination Under the UN Declaration on The
    Submission on Self-Determination under the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to the Expert Mechanism on the rights of indigenous peoples Table of Contents 1 Overview............................................................................................................................................3 1.1 Summary....................................................................................................................................3 1.2 The submitting organization......................................................................................................4 2 Self determination themes................................................................................................................4 2.1 Peace and Self-Determination...................................................................................................4 2.2 Compromised spaces.................................................................................................................7 2.3 Disenfranchisement of unrepresented peoples........................................................................8 2.4 Criminalization of self-determination movements..................................................................11 2.5 International trade and self-determination.............................................................................12 2.6 Indigenous land: commerce and climate.................................................................................13 3 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Register in Eastern Cham: Phonological, Phonetic and Sociolinguistic Approaches
    REGISTER IN EASTERN CHAM: PHONOLOGICAL, PHONETIC AND SOCIOLINGUISTIC APPROACHES A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Marc Brunelle August 2005 © 2005 Marc Brunelle REGISTER IN EASTERN CHAM: PHONOLOGICAL, PHONETIC AND SOCIOLINGUISTIC APPROACHES Marc Brunelle, Ph.D. Cornell University, 2005 The Chamic language family is often cited as a test case for contact linguistics. Although Chamic languages are Austronesian, they are claimed to have converged with Mon-Khmer languages and adopted features from their closest neighbors. A good example of such a convergence is the realization of phonological register in Cham dialects. In many Southeast Asian languages, the loss of the voicing contrast in onsets has led to the development of two registers, bundles of features that initially included pitch, voice quality, vowel quality and durational differences and that are typically realized on rimes. While Cambodian Cham realizes register mainly through vowel quality, just like Khmer, the registers of the Cham dialect spoken in south- central Vietnam (Eastern Cham) are claimed to have evolved into tone, a property that plays a central role in Vietnamese phonology. This dissertation evaluates the hypothesis that contact with Vietnamese is responsible for the recent evolution of Eastern Cham register by exploring the nature of the sound system of Eastern Cham from phonetic, phonological and sociolinguistic perspectives. Proponents of the view that Eastern Cham has a complex tone system claim that tones arose from the phonemicization of register allophones conditioned by codas after the weakening or deletion of coda stops and laryngeals.
    [Show full text]