Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 219/Wednesday, November 13, 2019/Notices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
61640 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2019 / Notices Ningbo Wwpartner Plastic Manufacture Third District, Jiangdong Street, Yiwu, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Co., Ltd. Apt. 501–48, No. 50, Lane Jinhua, Zhejiang, China 322000. Antitrust Division 578, South Tiantong Road, Yinzhou (c) The Office of Unfair Import District, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China Investigations, U.S. International Trade 315199. United States et al v. Deutsche Shenzhen Yuanzhen Technology Co., Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite Telekom AG; T-Mobile US, Inc.; Ltd. 805, Block B, Fuquan Building, 401, Washington, DC 20436; and SoftBank Group Corp.; and Sprint Qingquan Road, Longhua District, (4) For the investigation so instituted, Corp. Response to Public Comments Shenzhen, China 518000. the Chief Administrative Law Judge, Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures Jiangmen Boyan Houseware Co., Ltd. U.S. International Trade Commission, No. 18–1–107, Zhongxin South Road, and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), shall designate the presiding the United States hereby publishes Huicheng, Xinhui Dist., Jiangmen, Administrative Law Judge. Guangdong, China 529100. below the Response to Public Comments Shanghai Rbin Industry And Trade Co., Responses to the complaint and the on the Proposed Final Judgment in Ltd. Room D4003, Bldg. 1, No. 888, notice of investigation must be United States et al. v. Deutsche Telekom Huaxu Road, Qingpu Dist., Shanghai, submitted by the named respondents in AG; T-Mobile US, Inc.; SoftBank Group China 201702. accordance with section 210.13 of the Corp.; and Sprint Corp., Civil Action Jiangmen Shengke Hardware Products Commission’s Rules of Practice and No. 1:19–cv–02232–TJK, which was Co., Ltd. Cunqian House, Wubian Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to filed in the United States District Court Land, Heping Group, Xinjian Village, 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such for the District of Columbia on Siqian Town, Xinhui District, responses will be considered by the November 6, 2019, together with copies Jiangmen, Guangdong, China 529000. Commission if received not later than 20 of the 32 comments received by the Funan Anze Trading Co., Ltd. No. 104– days after the date of service by the United States. 16, Jiaoyang Road, Lucheng Town, Commission of the complaint and the Pursuant to the Court’s November 5, Funan County, Fuyang, Anhui, China notice of investigation. Extensions of 2019 order, comments were published 236300. time for submitting responses to the electronically and are available to be Hangzhou Keteng Trade Co., Ltd. C533, complaint and the notice of viewed and downloaded at the Antitrust Floor 5, Bldg. 3–C, No. 8, Xiyuan 9th Division’s website, at: https:// investigation will not be granted unless Road, Xihu Dist., Hangzhou, Zhejiang, www.justice.gov/atr/us-and-plaintiff- good cause therefor is shown. China 310030. states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag-et-al- Hunan Jiudi Shiye Import And Export Failure of a respondent to file a timely index-comments. A copy of the United Trading Co., Ltd. Room 1654, response to each allegation in the States’ response to the comments is also Building 4, Dameiyuan, No. 577, complaint and in this notice may be available at the same location. Copies of Yulan Road, Wangchengpo Street, deemed to constitute a waiver of the the comments and the United States’ Yuelu District, Changsha, Hunan, right to appear and contest the response are available for inspection at China (Mainland) 410205. allegations of the complaint and this the Office of the Clerk of the United Shenzhen Yaya Gifts Co., Ltd. No. 2, notice, and to authorize the States District Court for the District of Lane 3, East Of Henglingtang, administrative law judge and the Columbia. Copies of these materials may Pingshan Street, Pingshan New Dist., Commission, without further notice to also be obtained from the Antitrust Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 518118. Division upon request and payment of Ningbo Weixu International Trade Co., the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice the copying fee set by Department of Ltd. A27, Floor 5, Nongxin Bldg., Justice regulations. Ningbo, Zhejiang, China (Mainland) and to enter an initial determination 315600. and a final determination containing Amy R. Fitzpatrick, Ningbo Beland Commodity Co., Ltd. 14– such findings, and may result in the Counsel to the Senior Director for 6, No. 51, Bldg. 12, Xintiandi East issuance of an exclusion order or a cease Investigations and Litigation. Zone, Yinzhou Dist., Ningbo, and desist order or both directed against UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Zhejiang, China 315040. the respondent. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Xiamen One X Piece Imp.&Exp. Co., By order of the Commission. Ltd. 601, Bldg. 73, Jimei Zhongxin United States of America et al, Plaintiffs, Garden, Xiamen, Fujian, China 36100. Issued: November 6, 2019. v. Deutsche Telekom AG et al, Defendants Hunan Champion Top Technology Co., Lisa Barton, Case No. 1:19–cv–02232–TJK Ltd. No. 600, Wanfu North Road, Secretary to the Commission. RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFF UNITED Yuhua area, Changsha city, Hunan [FR Doc. 2019–24612 Filed 11–12–19; 8:45 am] STATES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS ON province, China 410000. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Yiwu Lizhi Trading Firm Unit 3, THE PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT Building 42, Xiawang New Village Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Procedural History ............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 III. Standard of Judicial Review ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 IV. The Investigation and the Proposed Final Judgment ....................................................................................................................... 8 V. Summary of Public Comments and the United States’ Response .................................................................................................... 15 A. Comments that Fail To Acknowledge the Context of Tunney Act Review .............................................................................. 16 B. Comments Regarding DISH’s Viability as a Competitor ............................................................................................................ 19 1. DISH’s Assets and Track Record .......................................................................................................................................... 19 2. DISH’s Incentive and Ability To Compete ........................................................................................................................... 25 C. Comments Regarding the Enforceability of the Proposed Final Judgment ............................................................................... 31 D. Other Comments Opposing Entry of the Proposed Final Judgment ......................................................................................... 37 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:51 Nov 12, 2019 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM 13NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2019 / Notices 61641 TABLE OF CONTENTS—Continued 1. Comments Regarding Harms Outside the Scope of the Complaint .................................................................................... 37 2. Comments Regarding Services Provided to MVNOs ............................................................................................................ 40 3. Comments Regarding Other Regulatory Matters .................................................................................................................. 42 4. Other Negative Comments ..................................................................................................................................................... 44 E. Comments Regarding Procedural Aspects Of this Review ......................................................................................................... 45 1. Sufficiency of the Filings ....................................................................................................................................................... 45 2. Comments Regarding the Timing of This Review ................................................................................................................ 46 F. Comments Supporting Entry of the Proposed Final Judgment .................................................................................................. 48 VI. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 52 I. Introduction enable DISH to enter the market as a competition during the transition As required by the Antitrust new 5G mobile wireless services period. To facilitate DISH’s transition to Procedures and Penalties Act (the provider and a fourth nationwide an independent wireless network, the ‘‘APPA’’ or ‘‘Tunney Act’’), 15 U.S.C. facilities-based wireless carrier. T- proposed Final Judgment requires T- 16(b)–(h), the United States hereby Mobile and Sprint must divest to DISH Mobile and Sprint to enter into a full responds to the public