The Economic Diplomacy of a Small State: the Case of Namibia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Economic Diplomacy of a Small State: the Case of Namibia a THE ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY OF A SMALL STATE: THE CASE OF NAMIBIA by Peya Mushelenga Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF LITERATURE AND PHILOSOPHY in the subject INTERNATIONAL POLITICS at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Promoter: Professor Jo-Ansie van Wyk Co-Promoter: Professor Clive J Napier March 2015 b Student Number: 312 887 15 I declare that ‘The economic diplomacy of small state: the case of Namibia’ is my own work and that all the sources that I have used or quoted, have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. ____________________ __________________ PEYA MUSHELENGA DATE c DEDICATION I dedicate this study to the memories of my late mother Elizabeth Nashilongo Mushelenga (néé Shihepo) who passed away on 10 October 2013 while I was busy with the final chapters of this study, and my eldest sister Taimi Kamati (néé Mushelenga) who passed away on 02 August 2014. Taimi was the language editor of the first chapters of this study. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study would not have been completed without the support that I have received from a number of people. First and foremost, I would like to express my humble gratitude to my late beloved mother, Elizabeth Nashilongo Mushelenga (néé Shihepo), who constantly gave me moral support to pursue my studies. My sincere thanks go to my late eldest sister, Taimi Kamati (néé Mushelenga), who language-edited the first chapters of the study. My mother and sister have not lived to see the completion of this study, and for all good reasons, I dedicate this study to their memories. My gratitude goes to my wife Eunike, a pillar of support in my life. I also acknowledge my son Panduleni, and daughter Pamwenatse, who played with me and provided the humour needed to ease the stress of the studies. I am grateful to André du Pisani and William (Bill) Lindeke, who made critical comments on the research proposal. Sadly, Bill has not lived to see the completion of the study. I shall for ever remain indebted to Jo-Ansie van Wyk for her constructive criticism, advice and continuous encouragement. Clive Napier made critiques that enabled me to make the necessary improvements on the thesis. I am grateful to the staff of the Namibian Parliament Library, the National Library, the Namibia Chamber of Commerce and Industry, officials from the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Industry and from Namibian embassies who provided me with the information that I needed in writing this thesis. I am further indebted to officials from the Bank of Namibia, University of Namibia, Namibia Tourism Board and the Ministry of Finance for providing me with statistical data used in this study. I would like to particularly single out Nelago Indongo, Anacy Mwanyangapo and Aloysius Tsheehama. I would like to thank all individuals whom I have interviewed, whose names appear on annex 1. They provided valuable primary information that enriched this study. I remain indebted to President Hifikepunye Pohamba, who took a personal interest in my studies and constantly encouraged me. My gratitude further goes to former President Sam ii Nujoma, for his moral support. Theo-Ben Gurirab inspired and nurtured my passion for diplomacy and international relations. Ndeutapo Amagulu provided me with his personal study materials on foreign policy. Sadly, he did not live to see the completion of the study. I would like to thank my successive secretaries, Josephine Boois, Tashiya Shivoro and Selma Hailonga for arranging my appointments for the interviews conducted during the research. I am indebted to my drivers/protection officers, Warrant Officers, Immanuel Abed and Tonata Moongo, who took me around when I was carrying out the research. Viviette Rittmann contributed to the language-editing of the thesis. I am most grateful to Professor Jairos Kangira who language-edited the final version of the thesis. iii The economic diplomacy of a small state: The case of Namibia By: Peya Mushelenga Degree: Doctor of Literature and Philosophy Subject: International Politics Supervisor: Prof Jo-Ansie Van Wyk Co-Supervisor: Prof Clive J Napier Summary This study is about the economic diplomacy of Namibia, as a small state, for the period 1990 – 2015. Liberalism, as a theory of International Relations (IR) studies, is the adopted analytical framework. Namibia’s economic diplomacy is anchored in the foreign policy principles enshrined in article 96 of her constitution, which advocate, inter alia, the maintenance of mutual beneficial relations. Namibia, further enacted laws and adopted policies that serve as domestic instruments of economic diplomacy. The stakeholders in Namibia’s economic diplomacy include both state and non-state actors. The study adopts a population of 8 million as the benchmark for small states, plus one of the following characteristics of small states: small size of the territory; low economy and the perception by the government leaders and nationals. Namibia’s bilateral economic diplomacy covers over one hundred countries. Her major trade partners, in terms of export trade and inward investments are Angola, Canada, China, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, South Africa, Switzerland, The United Kingdom and the United States. Bilateral economic diplomacy is further pursued through the Export Processing Zone (EPZ) exports. The Namibian Government pursues multilateral economic diplomacy with the European Union, as part of the Africa Caribbean Pacific states and with regional and international economic and trade organisations such as the Southern Africa Customs Union, the Southern Africa Development Community, the United Nations Conference in Trade and iv Development and the World Trade Organisation. Namibia also adopts conference diplomacy as a form of multilateral economic diplomacy. The study makes an epistemological contribution to the study of IR, that the world is constructed under the hierarchical order that constrains power-based relations and minimises conflicts in international trade. A minimal trend of pursuing interests is, however, observed. The study further makes an ontological contribution to the study of IR, that the behaviour of state and non-state actors are inclined to cooperation on the continuum of conflict and cooperation. The study concludes that, contrary to the assumptions in small states literature, that small states have limitations of capacity and play an insignificant role in multilateralism, Namibia has skilled negotiators who have led negotiations in regional and international organisations. Ten key terms: Bilateral economic diplomacy; economic diplomacy; economic partnership agreements; foreign policy; liberalism; multilateral economic diplomacy; Namibia; small states diplomacy; trade partners; and international relations studies. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter One Introduction 1. Introduction 1 1.2 Namibia in the world economy 1 1.3 Conceptual clarification 3 1.3.1 Foreign policy 3 1.3.2 Foreign policy doctrine 4 1.3.3 Economic diplomacy 4 1.3.4 Economic statecraft 5 1.3.5 Re-circling diplomacy 6 1.3.6 Deep-pocket or cheque book diplomacy 7 1.3.7 Developmental diplomacy 7 1.3.8 Public diplomacy 8 1.4 A historical overview of Namibia’s economic diplomacy 9 1.5 Economic diplomacy as a foreign policy principle and objective 10 1.6 Literature survey 13 1.7 Gaps in the existing literature on Namibia’s economic diplomacy 18 1.8 Statement of the research problem 19 1.9 Analytical framework and research methodology 21 1.9.1 Theoretical approaches to the International Political Economy and economic diplomacy 21 1.9.1.1 Realism 22 1.9.1.2 Constructivism 22 1.9.1.3 Post-structuralism 23 1.9.1.4 Marxism 24 1.9.1.5 New theories 24 1.9.2 Theoretical perspective of the study: Liberalism 25 1.9.3 Research methodology 29 1.10 Importance of the study 32 vi 1.11 Scope and limitations of the study 35 1.12 Chapter outline 36 1.13 Summary 38 Chapter Two The diplomacy of small states: a conceptual analysis 2.1 Introduction 40 2.2 The importance of a conceptual analysis in the study 41 2.3 Small states: a definition 42 2.4 Middle powers and large states 48 2.5 Diplomacy as an instrument of foreign policy 50 2.6 Nature and scope of small states 55 2.6.1 Small states diplomacy and multilateralism 57 2.6.2 Distinct diplomatic behaviour and preference for multilateralism 58 2.6.3 Dependence and limitations 60 2.6.4 Scarcity of human resources 60 2.6.5 Preference for negotiation rather than conflict 62 2.6.6 Limited use of economic statecraft 63 2.7 Factors affecting the diplomacy of small states 63 2.7.1 Identity 64 2.7.2 Size of national market and a limited domestic resources base 65 2.7.3 Vulnerability 65 2.7.4 Limited scope of public policy 67 2.8 Limitations of small states’ diplomacy 68 2.8.1 Attitude of large states 68 2.8.2 Constraints in influencing international agenda 69 2.8.3 Invisibility and weakness in the international political system 70 2.9 Diplomatic opportunities for small states 71 2.9.1 Asserting the role of small states 71 vii 2.9.2 Macro-economic stability 73 2.9.3 Resilience of small states 74 2.10 The contribution of the study of small states to the study of diplomacy and International Relations 75 2.11 Summary 81 Chapter Three The formative years of Namibia’s economic diplomacy: 1990 to 1995 3.1 Introduction 84 3.2 Namibia’s economic status at independence 85 3.3 Independence and economic diplomacy 88 3.3.1 Economic diplomacy as a new phase of post-independence struggle 89 3.3.2 Promotion of manufacturing industry 91 3.4 Regional economic diplomacy
Recommended publications
  • Special Report No
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 490 | FEBRUARY 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE w w w .usip.org North Korea in Africa: Historical Solidarity, China’s Role, and Sanctions Evasion By Benjamin R. Young Contents Introduction ...................................3 Historical Solidarity ......................4 The Role of China in North Korea’s Africa Policy .........7 Mutually Beneficial Relations and Shared Anti-Imperialism..... 10 Policy Recommendations .......... 13 The Unknown Soldier statue, constructed by North Korea, at the Heroes’ Acre memorial near Windhoek, Namibia. (Photo by Oliver Gerhard/Shutterstock) Summary • North Korea’s Africa policy is based African arms trade, construction of owing to African governments’ lax on historical linkages and mutually munitions factories, and illicit traf- sanctions enforcement and the beneficial relationships with African ficking of rhino horns and ivory. Kim family regime’s need for hard countries. Historical solidarity re- • China has been complicit in North currency. volving around anticolonialism and Korea’s illicit activities in Africa, es- • To curtail North Korea’s illicit activ- national self-reliance is an under- pecially in the construction and de- ity in Africa, Western governments emphasized facet of North Korea– velopment of Uganda’s largest arms should take into account the histor- Africa partnerships. manufacturer and in allowing the il- ical solidarity between North Korea • As a result, many African countries legal trade of ivory and rhino horns and Africa, work closely with the Af- continue to have close ties with to pass through Chinese networks. rican Union, seek cooperation with Pyongyang despite United Nations • For its part, North Korea looks to China, and undercut North Korean sanctions on North Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Appraisal Analysis of Political News in the Namibian
    A COMPARATIVE APPRAISAL ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL NEWS IN THE NAMIBIAN AND NEW ERA NEWSPAPERS FROM 2015 TO 2018 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN ENGLISH STUDIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NAMIBIA BY KRISTOPH NAMAWE (200915355) SUPERVISOR: DR COLLEN SABAO ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I hereby, firstly, acknowledge the encouragement, advice, assistance, suggestions and criticisms, from my supervisor, my thesis promoter Dr Collen Sabao, who skillfully guided and motivated me in this long journey. He has persistently, encouraged, and guided me throughout this process, which, because of his support, has been extraordinarily gratifying. Thank you for the moral support you have given me. I am honored to be counted among your supervisees. I will always treasure every minute we had! Secondly, I express profound appreciation to the Faculty of Humanities and Social Science of the University of Namibia, specifically Dr Nelson Mlambo for the opportunity to learn and for all the moral support. I would love to thank the Master of Arts in English Studies class of 2018. Over the past 2 years we have been sharing ideas, encouraging and motivating each other. The discussions and those charming experiences we shared pushed me this far, I appreciate your diligence, my good friends. Finally, my heartfelt thanks go to my family and friends. Firstly, to my husband who has been taking care of our house while I was away. Secondly, to my adorable June babies, Uriah and Azariah, I did not give you the attention you desired, more especially Azariah since day one as I was always running to the classes, studying for test/examination and doing assignments.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Speech for VOTE 07 Ministry of International Relations And
    MINISTRY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND COOPERATION BUDGET SPEECH VOTE 07 FOR THE 2019-2020 FINANCIAL YEAR BY HON. NETUMBO NANDI-NDAITW AH, MP DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER AND MINISTER APRIL 2019 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY MIRCO 2019/2020 Budget Speech 1 MOTIVATION FOR THE 201912020 FINANCIAL YEAR FOR VOTE 7IMINISTRY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND COOPERATION 1. Nine months ago, Namibia lost its first Foreign Minister, Dr. Theo - Ben Gurirab. The Ministry lost its guru of diplomacy and I lost my mentor. The outpouring sympathy and messages of condolence received from all over the world speak to his international standing and contribution to the maintenance of international peace and security and sustainable development. Through the Dr. Theo Ben Gurirab Lecture Series, the Ministry will keep his legacy and teachings alive, thereby assisting the Namibian diplomats in particular, to follow in his footsteps. 2. Having said that, it is indeed a privilege for me to motivate the budget vote of the Ministry of International Relations and Cooperation. At this junction, I on behalf of the Deputy Minister, the Special Advisor, Executive Director, Ambassadors and High Commissioners and my own behalf wish to extend our appreciation to H.E. Dr Hage G. Geingob for continuing entrusting us with the responsibility of promoting and protecting Namibia's national interest in the world. Honourable Chairperson of the Whole House Committee, Honourable Members 3. Major changes occurring in the international operating environment not only offers Namibia with new opportunities but also present serious challenges, that have advanced to an extent that we can only ignore them at the peril of our national interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia QER Q1 2020 Namibia Quarterly Economic Review January-March 2020
    Namibia QER Q1 2020 Namibia Quarterly Economic Review January-March 2020 Quarter News Key Data Special Summary Highlights Economic Trends Feature Variables 1 5 9 12 14 Quarter Summary Macroeconomic Situation – going into an unprecedented global crisis from a position of extreme weakness The latest preliminary national accounts for 2019 confirm what everyone suspected – Namibia’s economy has experienced four of its worst years since Independence. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 GDP growth 4.5% -0.3% -0.3% 0.7% -1.1% Recent pronouncements by local and international authorities that 2020 will see the resumption of modest growth have now been overtaken by events. The corona virus pandemic will, in the short to medium-term at least, severely affect economic performance and put significant strain on Namibia’s public finances which were already in poor shape. Efforts to get the economy through the immediate crisis will take precedence over efforts at reform. Namibia went into the global financial crisis in a relatively strong position from a fiscal and monetary point of view. This time is very different. New Cabinet Appointed On 16 March President Geingob announced a new government structure and on 22 March announced his new Cabinet and related appointments. The two Cabinets and appointments are summarised below taking into account the resignations of Bernhard Esau and Sacky Shangala over Fishrot and Katrina Hanse-Hamarwa over corruption in 2019. Old Cabinet New Cabinet Office of the President Office of the President 1 The Namibia Quarterly Economic Review is compiled by the Institute for Public Policy Research and is financially supported by the Hanns Seidel Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Provisional Fifty-Sixth Year
    United Nations S/PV.4410 Security Council Provisional Fifty-sixth year 4410th meeting Friday, 9 November 2001, 11.15 a.m. New York President: Mr. Patterson .................................... (Jamaica) Members: Bangladesh ...................................... Mr. Amin China .......................................... Mr. Wang Yingfan Colombia ....................................... Mr. Valdivieso France .......................................... Mr. Levitte Ireland ......................................... Mr. Corr Mali ........................................... Mr. Ouane Mauritius ....................................... Mr. Koonjul Norway ......................................... Mr. Kolby Russian Federation ................................ Mr. Granovsky Singapore ....................................... Mr. Mahbubani Tunisia ......................................... Mr. Mejdoub Ukraine ......................................... Mr. Krokhmal United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .... Sir Jeremy Greenstock United States of America ........................... Mr. Cunningham Agenda The situation concerning the Democratic Republic of the Congo. This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the interpretation of speeches delivered in the other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of a member of the delegation
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Namibia KAS Factbook April 2021 © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung E.V
    Republic of Namibia KAS Factbook April 2021 © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Independence 21 March 1990 (national holiday) 1 Capital Windhoek (about 400,000 inhabitants)0F Government Republic (bicameral system) Member of the Commonwealth of Nations since 1990 Official Language English (until 1990 also Afrikaans and German) Namibia has 13 recognized national languages, including 10 indigenous African languages and 3 Indo- European languages. Most frequent mother tongues are: Oshiwambo (48.9%), Nama/Damara (11.3%), 2 Afrikaans (10.4%).1F Administration 14 regions: Caprivi, Erongo, Hardap, Karas, Kavango, Khomas, Kunene, Ohangwena, Omaheke, Omusati, Oshana, Oshikoto, Otjozondjupa, Zambezi President Dr. Hage Geingob (since 2014) Area 824,292 km2 Geographical Angola (north), Zambia (north-east), Zimbabwe (north- borders east), Botswana (east), South Africa (south), Atlantic Ocean (west) 3 4 Population 2,678,192F inhabitants, 52% urban3F 5 Population growth 1.83%4F rate Unemployment Total: 34% rate Currency NAD (N$) 1 € = N$ 17.82 (22.02.21) 1 City of Windhoek, http://www.windhoekcc.org.na/pdf/Councillor%20Ogranogram%202016.pdf (2016) Other estimates higher number. 2 CIA, The World Factbook, (2021). 3 CIA, The World Factbook, (2021). 4 CIA, The World Factbook, (2021). 5 CIA, The World Factbook, (2021). - 2 - www.kas.de/namibia Religion 80% - 90% Christian (at least 50% Lutheran), 10% - 20% indigenous beliefs Contents 1. History – Colonialism and Independence ................................................................... 4 2. State and Politics
    [Show full text]
  • List of Delegations to the Seventieth Session of the General Assembly
    UNITED NATIONS ST /SG/SER.C/L.624 _____________________________________________________________________________ Secretariat Distr.: Limited 18 December 2015 PROTOCOL AND LIAISON SERVICE LIST OF DELEGATIONS TO THE SEVENTIETH SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY I. MEMBER STATES Page Page Afghanistan......................................................................... 5 Chile ................................................................................. 47 Albania ............................................................................... 6 China ................................................................................ 49 Algeria ................................................................................ 7 Colombia .......................................................................... 50 Andorra ............................................................................... 8 Comoros ........................................................................... 51 Angola ................................................................................ 9 Congo ............................................................................... 52 Antigua and Barbuda ........................................................ 11 Costa Rica ........................................................................ 53 Argentina .......................................................................... 12 Côte d’Ivoire .................................................................... 54 Armenia ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 28 February 1986
    other prices 50c (incl. GST) on page 2 'JUST DEAL FOR SPIES' Swapo rejects charges of victimising refugees STAFF REPORTER SW APO has rejected charges of victimising refugees and has sharply rebuked The Namibian for an editorial published last week, in which the movement was call­ ed upon to bring to trial the estimated 100 people in detention for spying activities. In a statement issued in London yesterday, the Swapo move­ ment said criticism in an editorial published in The Namibian was unjustified, since no decision had been taken on those accused of spying for South Africa. The statement emphasised the editorial published in the that investigations into the spy February 21 edition is based on network recently uncovered in a false premise and that the Swapo ranks, were continuing, criticism contained in the and the movement had not yet editorial is therefore totally reached the stage of making unjustified. decisions on what would be 'At no point either before, done with those involved. during or since the briefing at Swapo also rejected what which a small portion of the they referred to as 'wild allega­ evid.ence we have accumulated tions' concerning Namibians in on the South African spy net­ Swapo camJls in neighbouring work was presented, did Com- . Frontline States. (See report rade Theo Ben Gurirab or any below). other representative of Swapo The verbatim Swapo state­ state that Swapo was refusing SW APO refugee camp in Angola. In a statement issued in London this week Swapo has denied vi«;timisation ment is as follows: to put on trial those who have of Namibian refugees in camps in neighbouring states.
    [Show full text]
  • URGENT International Conference on the Great Lakes Region
    & Note to Mr. Kalomoh URGENT International Conference on the Great Lakes Region 1. On behalf of the Secretary-General, thank you for your note of 27 May. 2. The Secretary-General would prefer to send letters to the leaders of the core countries (Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia) that object to the inclusion of Angola and the Republic of Congo as full members of the Conference. 3. I would be grateful if the letters could be prepared by 3 June. Thank you. Sflqbsfl Riza 1 June 2004 Mr. Prendergast Mr. Guehenno Mr. Fall Mr. Menkerios Mr. Hayford EOSG / CENTRAL /i/i iO H i E *. t» anS.cfc.y Note to the Secretary-General ... * EXECUTIVE OFFICE ^ L OFTHESECRETARY-GENFRM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE GREAT LAKES REGION " 1. JQie non-resolution of theL question of participation in the Conference is delaying progress in the preparatory process. Initially participants were divided into two groups of countries: (i) core countries (Burundi, DRC, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia); and (ii) observers. However, after some neighbouring countries (including Angola and RoC) requested full participation in the process, the core countries decided to grant all 11 neighbours a hybrid status of co-opted members instead of admitting them in the core group. As co-opted members, the neighbouring countries will have more rights than mere observers but will not participate hi decision-making as full members do. 2. Angola and RoC are not contentwith the status of co-opted member and are now insisting that i they shouldl5ecome full members of the core group.
    [Show full text]
  • National Assembly Performance
    Institute for Public Policy Research Not Speaking Out: Measuring National Assembly Performance By Ellison Tjirera and Graham Hopwood IPPR Comment No. 4 September 2009 This paper analyses the amount of contributions that members of the National Assembly made to parliamentary debate from September 2005 to October 2007 as one indicator of parliamentary performance. Although it has been speculated that some members of the National Assembly contribute very little to debates on bills and motions, as far as the IPPR is aware no research since independence has actually sought to quantify how much MPs contribute to debates in the House. The principal measure used for this research paper was the number of lines each MP contributed to debate in the Hansard – the official record of parliament. Originally, the IPPR had hoped to examine Hansard from the inception of the current parliament in 2005 until mid-2009. However, this has proved impossible because Hansard is not available from October 2007 onwards since editions have not been published since then. For this reason this analysis is based on a two-year period from September 2005 to early October 2007, which was felt to be a long enough period to make an assessment of how much MPs contributed to debate. The methodology used by this research paper is restricted solely to the amount of lines that MPs have contributed to the official record of parliamentary proceedings. No attempt is made to assess the quality of those contributions as this would involve highly subjective value judgements. This paper also does not attempt to assess how MPs may contribute to other aspects of parliamentary life, for example the committee system.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of AG-066 United Nations Observer Mission in Liberia (UNOMIL)
    Summary of AG-066 United Nations Observer Mission in Liberia (UNOMIL) Title United Nations Observer Mission in Liberia (UNOMIL) Active Dates 1992-1998 Administrative History The United Nations Observer Mission in Liberia (UNOMIL) was established on 22 September 1993 by Security Council Resolution 866 (1993). Its purpose was to support the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in its efforts to end a civil war that had broken out in late 1989 by implementing, and impartially enforcing compliance with, the Cotonou Peace Agreement signed 23 July 1993. UNOMIL coordinated with the Economic Community of West African States Monitoring Group (ECOMOG), the peacekeeping force of ECOWAS, and an agreement defining the relationship between UNOMIL and ECOMOG was finalized in November 1993. UNOMIL, under the command of the Secretary-General, was led in the field by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) to Liberia. Serving as SRSG to Liberia were: Trevor Livingston Gordon-Somers of Jamaica (November 1992 – December 1994); Anthony Nyakyi of the United Republic of Tanzania (December 1994 - April 1997); and Tuliameni Kalomoh of Namibia (April – September 1997). UNOMIL was headquartered in Monrovia, Liberia, and was composed of military and civilian components. Command of the military component was entrusted to the Chief Military Observer (CMO), who reported to the Secretary-General through the Special Representative. The military component of UNOMIL monitored and verified compliance with the ceasefire, the embargo on delivery of arms and military equipment, as well as the cantonment, disarmament and demobilization of combatants. The civilian component included political, humanitarian, and electoral personnel. The electoral assistance element observed and verified the general and presidential elections, from the registration of voters to the voting itself.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Official Records
    United Nations A/AC.183/PV.290 General Assembly Official Records Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People 290th meeting Friday, 25 November 2005, 11 a.m. New York Chairman: Mr. Badji .............................................. (Senegal) The meeting was called to order at 11.15 a.m. honours the Committee and, above all, illustrates your commitment to the promotion and attainment of the International Day of Solidarity with the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people. Palestinian People I now invite all participants to rise to observe a The Chairman (spoke in French): Today, the minute of silence in memory of all those who have Committee is holding a solemn meeting to observe the given their lives for the cause of the Palestinian people International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian and the return of peace between Israelis and People, in accordance with the provisions of General Palestinians. Assembly resolution 32/40 B of 2 December 1977. The members of the Committee observed a minute It is my honour and great pleasure to warmly of silence. welcome Mr. Jan Eliasson, President of the General The Chairman (spoke in French): Allow me now Assembly; Mr. Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the to make a statement on behalf of the Committee. United Nations; and Mr. Andrey Denisov, President of the Security Council. I should especially like to A sense of shared responsibility vis-à-vis the acknowledge the presence among us of, and issue of Palestine has brought us together today, on respectfully welcome, Mr. Nasser Al-Kidwa, Minister 29 November, as it does every year, to observe the for Foreign Affairs of the Palestinian Authority.
    [Show full text]