Winter 2017 Volume 43 Issue 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Winter 2017 Volume 43 Issue 2 Winter 2017 Volume 43 Issue 2 199 Hilail Gildin On Rousseau’s Confession of Faith of the Savoyard Vicar 215 Daniel P. Maher Simon Stevin’s Vita Politica: Pre-provisional Morality? 233 Rafael Major Poetry and Reason: A Midsummer Night’s Dream 255 Ying Zhang Biblical Exegesis as a Way of Philosophizing: The Beginning and the End of Maimonides’s Guide of the Perplexed An Exchange: 279 Lee Ward The Challenge of Modernizing Seventeenth-Century English Political Texts: A Response to Foster 287 David Foster A Reply to Lee Ward Review Essay: 289 Robert Goldberg Homer on the Gods and Human Virtue: Creating the Foundations of Classical Civilization by Peter J. Ahrensdorf Book Reviews: 319 Stephen A. Block Principle and Prudence in Western Political Thought, edited by Christopher Lynch and Jonathan Marks 333 Eric Buzzetti The Socratic Turn: Knowledge of Good and Evil in an Age of Science by Dustin Sebell 341 Bernard J. Dobski The Philosopher’s English King: Shakespeare’s Henriad as Political Philosophy by Leon Harold Craig 347 Joshua D. King Humanitarian Ethics: A Guide to the Morality of Aid in War and Disaster by Hugo Slim 353 Peter McNamara The Foundations of Natural Morality: On the Compatibility of Natural Rights and the Natural Law by S. Adam Seagrave 357 Deborah O’Malley Beyond Radical Secularism: How France and the Christian West Should Respond to the Islamic Challenge by Pierre Manent; translated by Ralph C. Hancock 363 Lorraine Pangle Xenophon the Socratic Prince: The Argument of the Anabasis of Cyrus by Eric Buzzetti 369 Nathan Pinkoski Philosophy and the Puzzles of Hamlet by Leon Harold Craig 375 Manu Samnotra Arendt’s Judgment: Freedom, Responsibility, Citizenship by Jonathan Peter Schwartz ©2017 Interpretation, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of the contents may be reproduced in any form without written permission of the publisher. ISSN 0020-9635 Editor-in-Chief Timothy W. Burns, Baylor University General Editors Charles E. Butterworth • Timothy W. Burns General Editors (Late) Howard B. White (d. 1974) • Robert Horwitz (d. 1987) Seth G. Benardete (d. 2001) • Leonard Grey (d. 2009) • Hilail Gildin (d. 2015) Consulting Editors Christopher Bruell • David Lowenthal • Harvey C. Mansfield • Thomas L. Pangle • Ellis Sandoz • Kenneth W. Thompson Consulting Editors (Late) Leo Strauss (d. 1973) • Arnaldo Momigliano (d. 1987) • Michael Oakeshott (d. 1990) • John Hallowell (d. 1992) • Ernest L. Fortin (d. 2002) • Muhsin Mahdi (d. 2007) • Joseph Cropsey (d. 2012) • Harry V. Jaffa (d. 2015) International Editors Terence E. Marshall • Heinrich Meier Editors Peter Ahrensdorf • Wayne Ambler • Marco Andreacchio • Maurice Auerbach • Robert Bartlett • Fred Baumann • Eric Buzzetti • Susan Collins • Patrick Coby • Erik Dempsey • Elizabeth C’de Baca Eastman • Edward J. Erler • Maureen Feder-Marcus • Robert Goldberg • L. Joseph Hebert • Pamela K. Jensen • Hannes Kerber • Mark J. Lutz • Daniel Ian Mark • Ken Masugi • Carol L. McNamara • Will Morrisey • Amy Nendza • Charles T. Rubin • Leslie G. Rubin • Thomas Schneider • Susan Meld Shell • Geoffrey T. Sigalet • Nicholas Starr • Devin Stauffer • Bradford P. Wilson • Cameron Wybrow • Martin D. Yaffe • Catherine H. Zuckert • Michael P. Zuckert Copy Editor Les Harris Designer Sarah Teutschel Inquiries Interpretation, A Journal of Political Philosophy Department of Political Science Baylor University 1 Bear Place, 97276 Waco, TX 76798 email interpretation@baylor.edu Biblical Exegesis as a Way of Philosophizing 255 Biblical Exegesis as a Way of Philosophizing: The Beginning and the End of Maimonides’s Guide of the Perplexed* Ying Zhang Department of Philosophy, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China yzhang@philo.ecnu.edu.cn I The Bible is, as Arthur Hyman states, “central to Maimonides’ thought.”1 This is especially true of his Guide of the Perplexed. Though widely treated as a philosophic book, the purpose of the Guide, as the author himself states, is to explain certain biblical “terms” and “very obscure parables in the books of the prophets.”2 It is therefore not strange that the Guide begins and ends with a series of lexicographic renderings of what Maimonides presents as the key terms in the Bible. The first two words Maimonides treats in the Guide are ṣelem (image) and demuth (likeness) in Genesis 1:26: “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness” (Guide I 1, 21). According to Maimonides, the term ṣelem in this verse does not mean “the shape and configuration of a thing,” as is usually * Earlier versions of this article received valuable comments and suggestions from Professors Ralph Lerner and Mayer I. Gruber. The author would like to thank them for their great support and help. The research project that led to this essay was supported by Shanghai Philosophy and Social Science Projects Fund. 1 Arthur Hyman, “Maimonides as Biblical Exegete,” in Maimonides and His Heritage, ed. Idit Dobbs- Weinstein, Lenn E. Goodman, and James A. Grady (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2009), 2. 2 Moses Maimonides, The Guide of the Perplexed, ed. and trans. Shlomo Pines, with introductory essay by Leo Strauss (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963), 5–6. It needs to be noted that in the texts of the Guide of the Perplexed, the italicized words are those originally in Hebrew. © 2017 Interpretation, Inc. 256 I n t e r p r e t a t i o n Volume 43 / Issue 2 held. Rather, it should be rendered as “natural form,” that is, “the notion in virtue of which a thing is constituted as a substance and becomes what it is” (Guide I 1, 21–22, bold emphasis added). Likewise, Maimonides states that demuth here should be treated as “likeness in respect of a notion,” rather than the visible appearance. He further cites other biblical verses to sup- port his rendering of the words, and concludes that “it was…because of the divine intellect conjoined with man, that it is said of the latter that he is in the image of God and His likeness, not that God, may He be exalted, is a body and possesses a shape” (Guide I 1, 23; bold emphasis added). In other words, according to Maimonides, the image and the likeness that man shares with God is no other than intellect, the highest natural endowment of a human being, which separates man from all other earthly living beings. With this interpretation of the ṣelem of God, Maimonides begins his journey in the Guide. For students of philosophy, it may not be too hard to recognize Aristotelian concepts in this interpretation. For most Jews in the twelfth century, however, this rendering would seem quite odd, because it introduces certain pagan or alien elements, totally unfamiliar to the Jewish rabbinic tradition, into biblical interpretation. What then is the concern or purpose behind such a rendering? One thing is clear: what Maimonides offers is a kind of allegorical or figurative interpretation of the Bible. According to him, the true or intended meaning of the Bible’s equivocal terms and parables lies not in their external or literal, but rather in their internal or figurative, levels (Guide I Introduction, 5–12). In the very first chapter of the Guide, Maimonides emphasizes that the “image” by which man partakes in the deity is intellect; on the other hand, he also attempts to correct the mistaken opinion that God is corporeal. As Leo Strauss points out, “the first subject of the Guide is God’s incorporeality.”3 For Maimonides, the incorporeality of God is one of the three most important foundational teachings of the Torah, next to the existence and the unity of God. He thus states in his great Code, Mishneh Torah, “It is clearly set forth in the Torah and in the prophet that the Holy One (Blessed be He) is not a corporeal body, as it is said: For the Lord your God, He is the God in heaven above and upon earth beneath [a conflation of Josh. 2:11 and Deut. 4:39]. And a body cannot be in two places [simultaneously]” (“Laws concerning 3 Leo Strauss, “Introduction to Maimonides’ The Guide of the Perplexed,” in Leo Strauss on Mai- monides: The Complete Writings, ed. Kenneth Hart Green (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013), 448. Biblical Exegesis as a Way of Philosophizing 257 the Foundations of the Law,” 1.5).4 Now this principle of the incorporeality of God appears, at first glance, to contradict many biblical terms, such as “His feet” (Exod. 24:10), “the finger of God” (Exod. 31:18), “the hand of the Lord” (Exod. 9:3), and so on. According to Maimonides, these figurative expres- sions were not more than “substitutes for the divine Name,” whose function was to help “the sons of man who cannot acknowledge anything other than bodies” in understanding the true teaching concerning God (“Laws concern- ing the Foundations of the Law,” 1.6).5 The establishment of the principle of the incorporeality of God is, for Maimonides, a necessary step towards eradi- cating the impulsion toward idolatry from the human heart, because idolatry always takes the form of the worship of images. On the other hand, as Leo Strauss incisively notices, “the belief in cor- poreality is one of the major reasons for the conflict between the Bible and philosophy.”6 Now the tension between the teaching of the Torah and that of philosophy is the biggest problem that perplexes Maimonides’s student Rabbi Joseph ben Judah—who is also the addressee of the Guide—and his like (Guide, “Epistle Dedicatory,” 3–4). It is thus not strange that Maimonides devotes his second chapter to the interpretation of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Maimonides’s interpretation of the Garden of Eden story begins with an objection that “a learned man” raised with him.
Recommended publications
  • On Philosophical Counseling As a Philosophical Caretaking Practice
    On Philosophical Counseling as a Philosophical Caretaking Practice A THESIS SUBMITTED ON THE 23'd DAY OF JULY OF 2014 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SCHOOL OF LmERAL ARTS OF TULANE UNIVERSITY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY Gilberto Vargas-Gonzalez APPROVED: &~ 4. Ronna Burger, Ph.D., Director /hv VJvf!Jy-- Richard Velkley, Ph.D. ~.PhD -" On Philosophical Counseling as a Philosophical Caretaking Practice AN ABSTRACT SUBMITTED ON THE 23 rd DAY OF JULY OF 2014 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SCHOOL OF LffiERAL ARTS OF TULANE UNIVERSITY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY Gilberto Vargas-Gonzalez APPROVED: --+ffi-",/lvlJ.,--",-",,-,~c:.=.>p>~_ Ronna Burger, Ph.D., Director y~~ Richard Velkley, Ph.D. ~- Michael Zimmerman, Ph.D. While “philosophical counseling” emerged in the 1980’s as a new form of caretaking practice, it can be understood as an attempt to re-embrace a tradition that goes back to the ancients, with their conception of philosophy as a “way of life.” This study discusses elements of that tradition in order to provide a theoretical-historical framework for the modern practice of philosophical counseling. The central figure for this philosophic tradition is Socrates. The present study focused on his notion of the “the examined life,” while considering some doctrines in Hellenistic philosophy as further expressions of the Socratic tradition. As represented in the Platonic dialogues, Socrates exhibits “the examined life” by engaging in the practice of philosophy as some kind of “care of the soul.” Though he speaks on occasion of the “conversion” that may be required for the commitment to this philosophic practice, it is carried out, in dialogical settings, through the rational-cognition dimension of reason and argument, undertaken with a basic critical stance.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2019 Volume 45 Issue 2
    Spring 2019 Volume 45 Issue 2 155 Ian Dagg Natural Religion in Montesquieu’s Persian Letters and The Spirit of the Laws 179 David N. Levy Aristotle’s “Reply” to Machiavelli on Morality 199 Ashleen Menchaca-Bagnulo “Deceived by the Glory of Caesar”: Humility and Machiavelli’s Founder Reviews Essays: 223 Marco Andreacchio Mastery of Nature, edited by Svetozar Y. Minkov and Bernhardt L. Trout 249 Alex Priou The Eccentric Core, edited by Ronna Burger and Patrick Goodin 269 David Lewis Schaefer The Banality of Heidegger by Jean-Luc Nancy Book Reviews: 291 Victor Bruno The Techne of Giving by Timothy C. Campbell 297 Jonathan Culp Orwell Your Orwell by David Ramsay Steele 303 Fred Erdman Becoming Socrates by Alex Priou 307 David Fott Roman Political Thought by Jed W. Atkins 313 Steven H. Frankel The Idol of Our Age by Daniel J. Mahoney 323 Michael Harding Leo Strauss on Nietzsche’s Thrasymachean-Dionysian Socrates by Angel Jaramillo Torres 335 Marjorie Jeffrey Aristocratic Souls in Democratic Times, edited by Richard Avramenko and Ethan Alexander-Davey 341 Peter Minowitz The Bleak Political Implications of Socratic Religion by Shadia B. Drury 347 Charles T. Rubin Mary Shelley and the Rights of the Child by Eileen Hunt Botting 353 Thomas Schneider From Oligarchy to Republicanism by Forrest A. Nabors 357 Stephen Sims The Legitimacy of the Human by Rémi Brague ©2019 Interpretation, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of the contents may be reproduced in any form without written permission of the publisher. ISSN 0020-9635 Editor-in-Chief Timothy W. Burns, Baylor University General Editors Charles E.
    [Show full text]
  • L Rathnam Dissertation
    The Politics of Skepticism: Montaigne and Zhuangzi on Freedom, Toleration, and the Limits of Government by Lincoln Edward Ford Rathnam A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Lincoln Edward Ford Rathnam 2018 ii The Politics of Skepticism: Montaigne and Zhuangzi on Freedom, Toleration, and the Limits of Government Lincoln Rathnam Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science 2018 Abstract: Contemporary political discourse often centers on a shared set of normative commitments: freedom, toleration, and limited government. This dissertation examines the theoretical basis for these commitments, through a comparative study of two eminent skeptics: Michel de Montaigne and Zhuangzi. Both develop forms of skepticism that are rooted in analyses of the phenomena of diversity and disagreement. They contend that our inability to reach convergence on central philosophical questions demonstrates the fundamental limitations of human knowledge. I argue that both offer novel and powerful arguments connecting these skeptical epistemological theses with the relevant normative commitments. In particular, both take skepticism to advance human freedom, by clearing away obstacles to effective action. As beings who are raised within a particular community, we inevitably acquire certain habits that constrain the forms of thought and action open to us. Skepticism helps us to recognize the contingency of those forms. In the interpersonal realm, both writers contend that skepticism generates an attitude of toleration towards others who live differently. This is because it undermines the theoretical claims upon which most forms of intolerance are constructed. I defend this claim with reference to the various forms of intolerance that existed in each writer’s context, Warring States era China and France during the Wars of Religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Marc D. Guerra, Ph.D
    Marc D. Guerra, Ph.D. Theology Department, Assumption College, 500 Salisbury Street, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609 Office (508) 767-7575; Email: mguerra@assumption.edu EDUCATION Ph. D. Ave Maria University (Theology) Naples, Florida (May 2007) M.A. Assumption College (Theology) Worcester, Massachusetts (May 1994) B.A. Assumption College (Psychology) Worcester, Massachusetts (May 1990) ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Assumption College (Worcester, Massachusetts) Professor (2016-) Director of Core Texts and Enduring Questions Program (2016-) Associate Professor (2012-2016) Theology Department Chair (2012-) Ave Maria University (Naples, Florida) Associate Professor (2010-2012) Director of Graduate Programs in Theology (2007-2012) Assistant Professor of Theology (2004-2009) Assumption College (Worcester, Massachusetts) Instructor of Theology (1999-2004) SCHOLARLY CONCENTRATION Relationship between Faith and Reason Catholicism and the Political Order Pope Benedict XVI PUBLICATIONS AUTHORED BOOKS Christians as Political Animals: Taking the Measure of Modernity and Modern Democracy (Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 2010). EDITED BOOKS Liberating Logos: Pope Benedict XVI’s September Speeches (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2014) Pope Benedict XVI and the Politics of Modernity (London: Routledge Publications, 2014). Jerusalem, Athens, and Rome: Essays in Honor of James V. Schall, S.J. (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2013). 1 The Science of Modern Virtue: On Descartes, Darwin, and Locke, coedited with Peter Augustine Lawler (DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press, 2013). Reason, Revelation, and Human Affairs: Selected Writings of James V. Schall (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2001). ARTICLES AND ESSAYS “Scientist, Scholar, Soul” in The New Atlantis, (48) Spring/Summer 2016. 110-120. “Moderating the Magnanimous Man: Aquinas on Greatness of Soul” in Theology Needs Philosophy: Essays in Honor of Ralph McInerny, edited by Matthew L.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe (In Theory)
    EUROPE (IN THEORY) ∫ 2007 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper $ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Minion with Univers display by Keystone Typesetting, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. There is a damaging and self-defeating assumption that theory is necessarily the elite language of the socially and culturally privileged. It is said that the place of the academic critic is inevitably within the Eurocentric archives of an imperialist or neo-colonial West. —HOMI K. BHABHA, The Location of Culture Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction: A pigs Eye View of Europe 1 1 The Discovery of Europe: Some Critical Points 11 2 Montesquieu’s North and South: History as a Theory of Europe 52 3 Republics of Letters: What Is European Literature? 87 4 Mme de Staël to Hegel: The End of French Europe 134 5 Orientalism, Mediterranean Style: The Limits of History at the Margins of Europe 172 Notes 219 Works Cited 239 Index 267 Acknowledgments I want to thank for their suggestions, time, and support all the people who have heard, read, and commented on parts of this book: Albert Ascoli, David Bell, Joe Buttigieg, miriam cooke, Sergio Ferrarese, Ro- berto Ferrera, Mia Fuller, Edna Goldstaub, Margaret Greer, Michele Longino, Walter Mignolo, Marc Scachter, Helen Solterer, Barbara Spack- man, Philip Stewart, Carlotta Surini, Eric Zakim, and Robert Zimmer- man. Also invaluable has been the help o√ered by the Ethical Cosmopol- itanism group and the Franklin Humanities Seminar at Duke University; by the Program in Comparative Literature at Notre Dame; by the Khan Institute Colloquium at Smith College; by the Mediterranean Studies groups of both Duke and New York University; and by European studies and the Italian studies program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu on Commerce, Conquest, War, and Peace
    MONTESQUIEU ON COMMERCE, CONQUEST, WAR, AND PEACE Robert Howse* I. INTRODUCTION:COMMERCE AS THE AGENT OF PEACE:MONTESQUIEU AND THE IDEOLOGY OF LIBERALISM n the history of liberalism, Montesquieu, who died two hundred and Ififty years ago, is an iconic figure. Montesquieu is cited as the source of the idea of checks and balances, or separation of powers, and thus as an intellectual inspiration of the American founding.1 Among liberal internationalists, Montesquieu is known above all for the notion that international trade leads to peace among nation-states. When liberal international relations theorists such as Michael Doyle attribute this posi- tion to Montesquieu,2 they cite Book XX of the Spirit of the Laws,3 in which Montesquieu claims: “The natural effect of commerce is to bring peace. Two nations that negotiate between themselves become recipro- cally dependent, if one has an interest in buying and the other in selling. And all unions are based on mutual needs.”4 On its own, Montesquieu’s claim raises many issues. Montesquieu’s point is that trade based on mutual dependency discourages war. Here, Montesquieu abstracts entirely from the relative power of the states in question, a concern that is pervasive in his concrete analyses of relation- ships among political communities. For example, later on in the same section of the Spirit of the Laws he mentions that trade relations between Carthage and Marseille led to jealousy and a security conflict: There were, in the early times, great wars between Carthage and Mar- seille concerning the fishery. After the peace, they competed in eco- nomic commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Essay What Is Wrong with Human Rights?
    Book Review: La loi naturelle et les droits de l’homme 451 Review Essay Pierre Manent, La loi naturelle et les droits de l’homme. Paris: Presses Univer- sitaires de France, 2018, 134 pp., $22.84 (kindle), $27.12 (paperback). What Is Wrong with Human Rights? José A. Colen University of Navarre (Spain) and CEPS Minho University (Portugal) jcolen@unav.es In 1942, under the shadow of World War II and the distressing situation of a divided and occupied France, Jacques Maritain wrote a small book which he described as “an essay in political philosophy.”1 The author felt that not only civilization was at stake, but the need to win the peace after winning the war. This required a political philosophy able to keep totalitarianism at bay. Mari- tain was among the most famous French neo-Thomist philosophers, having written extensively about Aquinas’s metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of nature, and ethics, but his own contribution to political matters had hitherto been scarce. It would probably have remained in the background had it not been for his active involvement in the UNESCO commission that debated the philosophical basis of the yet unborn Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The book-essay, entitled Les droits de l’homme et la loi natu- relle, starts from the relations between person and society and argues that the recognition of the dignity of the human person had its apex in “Christian philosophy,” notwithstanding the acknowledgment of other contributions. 1 Jaques Maritain, Les droits de l’homme et la loi naturelle (Paris: Paul Hartmann Éditeur, 1943), 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-2013 Lectures
    2012-2013 Lectures Friday, September 21 Fred Baumann, Kenyon College, on "The Problem of Trust in Democracies" Fred Baumann is Professor of Political Science at Kenyon College. He came to Kenyon as director of the Public Affairs Conference Center and part-time teacher of Political Science in 1980, entering the department full-time in 1986. He teaches courses in the history of political philosophy, politics and literature, diplomatic history and statesmanship as well as PSCI 101-102. The author of Fraternity and Politics: Choosing One's Brothers, Baumann is now working on a book on the status of political humanism. He is an associate editor of the journal Interpretation, and has served as chair of the Faculty Affairs Committee. Baumann received the Senior Faculty Trustee Teaching Award and was invited to give the Founders' Day talk. He earned a B.A. from Cornell University and a Ph.D. in History from Harvard University. Recent publications include “Humanism and Transhumanism,” in The New Atlantis (2010), “Humanism’s Four Stages,” in the American Interest (2010), “Schiller on Aesthetic Education: Radicalization by Return” in Recovering Reason: Essays in Honor of Thomas L. Pangle (2010), and Visions of Utopia: Philosophy and the Perfect Society, a course of 14 recorder lectures. Tuesday, October 16 James Stoner , Louisiana State University, on "Republicans v. Democrats: The Case of the Confederate Constitution" James R. Stoner Jr. is Professor of Political Science at Louisiana State University, where he has taught since 1988. He is the author of Common-Law Liberty: Rethinking American Constitutionalism (Kansas, 2003) and Common Law and Liberal Theory: Coke, Hobbes, and the Origins of American Constitutionalism (Kansas, 1992), as well as a number of articles and essays.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Derechos Humanos Como Ideología Una Lectura Desde El Pensamiento “Antimoderno” Human Rights As an Ideology a “Counter
    OctubreDerecho Público 2013 IberoamericanoLos, Nº derechos3, pp. 39-73 humanos [octubre como 2013] ideología. Una lectura desde el pensamiento “antimoderno” LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS COMO IDEOLOGÍA UNA LECTURA DESDE EL PENSAMIENTO “ANTIMODERNO” HUMAN RIGHTS AS AN IDEOLOGY A “COUNTER-MODERNIST” READING Julio Alvear Téllez* “Los derechos humanos hacen de la humanidad la medida de todas las cosas y desde el punto de vista religioso esto constituye una forma de idolatría”. Michael IGNATIEFF, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry, 2001. “Ya no tenemos mapas ni navegadores y ya no creemos en astrólogos y en profetas. Es el miedo a morir, la imaginación loca, el deseo más allá de todo objeto lo que nos puede conducir, sin plan pero con pasión, más allá de la crisis, con la esperanza incierta de inventar una sociedad” Alain TOURAINE, Après la crise, 2010. Resumen Hay que distinguir entre “derechos humanos” y derechos o bienes de la persona humana. Los primeros connotan una visión de los derechos fundamentales profundamente ideológica, que se vuelve explícita en la medida en que se analiza su génesis histórico-conceptual y su rol instru- mental al proyecto político totalizante de la modernidad. Dicho proyecto, hoy en declive, se ha presentado como “emancipador”, lo que en realidad es un eufemismo para cubrir el carácter subjetivista, constructivista y racionalista de los derechos humanos en el plano individual y colectivo, tendencia que hoy pulsa por disolver todo lo estable. Palabras claves: “derechos humanos”, modernidad, racionalismo, subje- tivismo, disolución. * Doctor en Derecho y Doctor © en Filosofía, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Profesor de Derecho Constitucional y miembro del Centro de Justicia Constitucional de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad del Desarrollo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Damned Neighbors Problem: Rousseau's Civil Religion Revisited
    religions Article The Damned Neighbors Problem: Rousseau’s Civil Religion Revisited Micah Watson Department of Political Science, Calvin University, 3201 Burton SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546, USA; mw45@calvin.edu Received: 15 April 2019; Accepted: 25 May 2019; Published: 29 May 2019 Abstract: Near the conclusion of The Social Contract, Jean-Jacques Rousseau starkly proclaims that no state has been founded without a religious basis, and thus if he is right, every political community must grapple with the tension between the conflicting claims of the divine and the mundane. Because Christianity cannot solve this tension, Rousseau calls for a new religion, a civil religion. Whereas most of the academic treatment of civil religion follows various paths beginning with Robert Bellah’s original 1967 article, this essay explores more deeply the contours of Rousseau’s original articulation of the problem to which civil religion is his proposed solution. The essay concludes by suggesting that we can find important elements of Rousseau’s approach still alive and well in American politics and culture today. Keywords: civil religion; Jean-Jacques Rousseau; tolerance; social cohesion; Christianity; religion and politics 1. Introduction The academic treatment of civil religion as a cultural and religious phenomenon began with Robert Bellah’s 1967 Daedalus article, “Civil Religion in America” and continued in earnest for some time as sociologists, political scientists, historians, theologians, and religious studies scholars joined the discussion, some attempting
    [Show full text]
  • Raymond Aron's Response to Irresponsible Metaphysics*
    Raymond Aron’s Response to Irresponsible Metaphysics* Aurelian Craiutu Assistant Professor. Department of Political Science. Indiana University. Resumo Abstract Os livros de Raymond Aron apresentam-se como Raymond Aron’s books stand out as an example of um exemplo de um julgamento político lúcido lucid political judgment in an age of extremes in numa época de extremos em que muitos intelec- which many intellectuals shunned moderation and tuais se afastaram da moderação e foram atraí- were attracted to various forms of irresponsible dos para várias formas de metafísicas irrespon- metaphysics and political radicalism. By drawing on sáveis e de radicalismo político. Extraindo uma a representative selection from Aron’s writings selecção representativa dos escritos de Aron covering more than three decades of his life, this que cobrem mais de três décadas da sua vida, paper concentrates on the “committed observer” este paper concentra “no observador comprome- (spectateur engagé) as Aron’s response to tido” (spectateur engagé) a resposta de Aron irresponsible metaphysics. I also present and às metafísicas irresponsáveis. Eu também apre- comment on Aron’s views on the role, virtues, limits, sento e comento as opiniões de Aron acerca do and possibility of moderation in political life. papel, virtudes, limites, e possibilidade de mo- Although Aron brilliantly played the role of the deração na vida política. Embora Aron jogasse “committed observer,” he never gave a clear brilhantemente o papel do ”observador com- theoretical statement on this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • MAIMONIDES SCHOLARS PROGRAM at YALE UNIVERSITY June 24 - July 8, 2018
    MAIMONIDES SCHOLARS PROGRAM at YALE UNIVERSITY June 24 - July 8, 2018 1 A Jewish Summer at Yale Who Should Apply? Current high school juniors and seniors at public and private schools Location: Yale University Program Dates: June 24 – July 8, 2018 Application Deadline: February 16, 2018 2 The Jewish Summer I Never Had Dear Friend, The Tikvah Fund has launched many new educational programs over the years, but none that resonate as personally for me as the new Maimonides Scholars Program. When I was 17, I knew almost nothing about Judaism. Education meant everything in our family, but our Jewish education was weak. I studied dili- gently for my Bar Mitzvah, but never grappled seriously with the texts, traditions, and exceptionalism of Jewish civilization. I was interested in ideas—philosophy, politics, economics, even theology—but I never knew that Judaism had enduring wisdom to offer on the good life and the good society. In short: I was the high school student back then that the Maimonides Scholars Program aims to reach today. Based at Yale University, the Maimonides Scholars Program is an intensive, two-week intellectual and Jewish experience in late June and early July of summer 2018. Built around a series of seminars and conversations, the major topics will range from Jewish thought to political philosophy, from the spirit of American democracy to the meaning of Zionism, from current political debates to enduring moral problems. Our teachers and professors come from some of the great universities and think tanks in the world, and our students will form Jewish friendships that last a lifetime.
    [Show full text]