DOCSLIB.ORG

Pretreatment Data to Evaluate the Effects of Fuel Management Treatments in the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pretreatment Data to Evaluate the Effects of Fuel Management Treatments in the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Pretreatment Data to Evaluate the Effects of Fuel Management Treatments in the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area By Steven Ostoja1, Matthew Brooks1, Jesse Poulos2 and Julie Yee3 1 U.S. Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center Yosemite Field Station, El Portal Office El Portal, California 95318-0700 2 Utah State University Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center 5230 Old Main Hill Logan, Utah 84322-5230 3 U.S Geological Survey Western Ecological Research Center - Headquarters 3020 State University Drive East Modoc Hall, Room 3006 Sacramento, CA 95819 Prepared for: Clark County, Nevada Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management Desert Conservation Program Interlocal Number 2005-USGS-551-P Funding Source: SNPLMA ROUND 6 Administrative Report U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1 U.S. Department of the Interior Ken Salazar, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2010 Revised and reprinted: 2010 This report received policy, editorial and statistical review, plus two peer-reviews, prior to final release. product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Ostoja, S.M., M.L. Books, J. Poulos and J. Yee. 2010, Pretreatment Data to Evaluate the Effects of Fuel Management Treatments in the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area: El Portal, California, xx p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. 2 Errata for the Report: Pretreatment Data to Evaluate the Effects of Fuel Management Treatments in the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area 2011 Steven Ostoja, Matthew Brooks, Jesse Poulos and Julie Yee 2005-USGS-551 SNPLMA PROJECT # CC-44 On page 8 of the report, the authors appear to have incorrectly cited Boyd (2004) for the assertion that Ericameria nauseosa is a larval host plant for Chlosyne acastus robusta and inadvertently omitted Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus from the study design. In his 2004 report, Boyd does not make this assertion. Boyd (2004) reported Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus as a verified larval host plant for Chlosyne acastus robusta. This error also occurs on pages 72 (appendix F), 73 (table 1), 74 (table 2), and 76 (table 3) where E. nauseosa is included and noted to be a larval host plant (LHP) for Chlosyne acastus robusta. Additionally, as of January 25, 2012 such a relationship between any other subspecies of Chlosyne acastus and E. nauseosa had not been found in a review of information of larval host plants for all subspecies of C. acastus (personal communication, Corey Kallstrom, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southern Nevada Field Office.) On page 13 of the report, the authors listed Adenostoma fasciculatum among the dominant plants seen in the project area. This species was not previously known from the area, no voucher specimens or photographs were made of the plant, and this species identification should be considered inconclusive (personal communication, 25 January 2012, Corey Kallstrom, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southern Nevada Field Office based upon 10 November 2011 email from Jennifer Brickey, U.S. Forest Service, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Spring Mountains National Recreation Area.) References Boyd, B. 2004. Report on Butterfly Investigation in the Spring Mountains, Nevada, 2002-2003. Unpublished report prepared for the U.S. Forest Service, Spring Mountains National Recreation Area in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Prepared on 30 September 2004. -Susan Wainscott, Adaptive Management Coordinator, Desert Conservation Program Contents Contents........................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 Background, Need, and Project Description ......................................................................... 5 Elements of the MSHCP Addressed by this Project ............................................................. 7 Species ................................................................................................................................... 8 Species Threats ...................................................................................................................... 8 Ecosystem/Habitats ................................................................................................................ 9 Ecosystem Threats ................................................................................................................. 9 Conservation/Management Actions ........................................................................................ 9 Goals of the Project ................................................................................................................. 9 Hypotheses to be Addressed with Future Sampling ............................................................ 9 METHODS .................................................................................................................................. 10 Study Site.................................................................................................................................... 10 Fuel Reduction Thinning Treatments ................................................................................... 11 MSHCP Covered Species (Covered Plants and Host Plants for Covered Butterflies) .............................................................................................................................. 12 MSHCP Covered Ecosystems ............................................................................................... 13 Data Syntheses and Analyses .............................................................................................. 14 MSHCP Covered Species ..................................................................................................... 15 MSHCP Covered Ecosystems .............................................................................................. 15 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................... 16 Objectives Completed ........................................................................................................... 16 MSHCP Covered Species ..................................................................................................... 18 Baseline Vegetation Conditions ......................................................................................... 18 Power Analyses ................................................................................................................. 18 MSHCP Covered Ecosystems .............................................................................................. 18 Shrub and Tree Density and Cover .................................................................................... 18 Invasive Species Cover, Density, and Diversity ................................................................. 19 Native Annual Species Cover, Density, and Diversity ........................................................ 19 Native Perennial Species Cover, Density, and Diversity .................................................... 20 Evidence Objectives/Needs were Met/Fulfilled ................................................................... 20 Maps ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Evaluation/Discussion of Results ........................................................................................ 21 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 23 Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 23 Field Data Collection .......................................................................................................... 23 Analyses for the Covered Plant Populations ...................................................................... 24 Analyses for the Listed Ecosystems .................................................................................. 24 Additional Considerations .................................................................................................. 25 Literature Cited ...................................................................................................................... 26 Appendices ............................................................................................................................. 29 3 Table of Contents Cont. Tables ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Historical Biogeography of Tribes and Genera in the Subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKBIJBiological Journal of the Linnean Society 0024-4066The Linnean Society of London, 2005? 2005 862 227251 Original Article PHYLOGENY OF NYMPHALINAE N. WAHLBERG ET AL Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 86, 227–251. With 5 figures . Phylogenetic relationships and historical biogeography of tribes and genera in the subfamily Nymphalinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) NIKLAS WAHLBERG1*, ANDREW V. Z. BROWER2 and SÖREN NYLIN1 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331–2907, USA Received 10 January 2004; accepted for publication 12 November 2004 We infer for the first time the phylogenetic relationships of genera and tribes in the ecologically and evolutionarily well-studied subfamily Nymphalinae using DNA sequence data from three genes: 1450 bp of cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) (in the mitochondrial genome), 1077 bp of elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1-a) and 400–403 bp of wing- less (both in the nuclear genome). We explore the influence of each gene region on the support given to each node of the most parsimonious tree derived from a combined analysis of all three genes using Partitioned Bremer Support. We also explore the influence of assuming equal weights for all characters in the combined analysis by investigating the stability of clades to different transition/transversion weighting schemes. We find many strongly supported and stable clades in the Nymphalinae. We are also able to identify ‘rogue’
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • Dieteria [Machaeranthera] Cansecens
    HOARY TANSYASTER Dieteria (Machaeranthera) canescens (Pursh) Nutt. Asteraceae – Aster family Corey L. Gucker & Nancy L. Shaw | 2018 ORGANIZATION NOMENCLATURE Dieteria canescens (Pursh) Nutt. until recently Names, subtaxa, chromosome number(s), hybridization. (2010) was known as Machaeranthera canescens (Pursh) A. Gray (ITIS 2017; USDA NRCS 2017). This species belongs to the Astereae tribe of the Asteraceae family (Morgan Range, habitat, plant associations, elevation, soils. 2006) and will hereafter be referred to by its common name, hoary tansyaster. NRCS Plant Code. MACA2 (USDA NRCS 2017). Life form, morphology, distinguishing characteristics, reproduction. Subtaxa. The Flora of North America (Morgan 2006) recognizes ten varieties of hoary tansyaster: Dieteria canescens var. Growth rate, successional status, disturbance ecology, importance to canescens, ambigua, aristata, glabra, incana, animals/people. leucanthemifolia, nebraskana, sessiliflora, shastensis, and ziegleri. Current or potential uses in restoration. Synonyms (Morgan 2006). Dieteria canescens: Machaeranthera canescens (Pursh) A. Gray; Aster canescens Seed sourcing, wildland seed collection, seed cleaning, storage, Pursh testing and marketing standards. D. c. var. ambigua: M. canescens (Pursh) A. Gray var. ambigua B.L. Turner D. c. var. aristatus: A. canescens Pursh var. Recommendations/guidelines for producing seed. aristatus Eastwood; M. canescens (Pursh) A. Gray var. aristata (Eastwood) B.L. Turner; M. rigida Greene D. c. var. canescens: M. divaricata (Nuttall) Recommendations/guidelines for producing planting stock. Greene; M. laetevirens Greene; M. latifolia A. Nelson; M. pulverulenta (Nuttall) Greene; M. viscosa (Nuttall) Greene D. c. var. glabra: M. canescens (Pursh) A. Gray Recommendations/guidelines, wildland restoration successes/ var. glabra A. Gray; A. canescens Pursh var. failures. viridis A. Gray; M. linearis Greene D.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants and a Brief History of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands
    United States Department of Agriculture Vascular Plants and a Brief Forest Service Rocky Mountain History of the Kiowa and Rita Research Station General Technical Report Blanca National Grasslands RMRS-GTR-233 December 2009 Donald L. Hazlett, Michael H. Schiebout, and Paulette L. Ford Hazlett, Donald L.; Schiebout, Michael H.; and Ford, Paulette L. 2009. Vascular plants and a brief history of the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS- GTR-233. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 44 p. Abstract Administered by the USDA Forest Service, the Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands occupy 230,000 acres of public land extending from northeastern New Mexico into the panhandles of Oklahoma and Texas. A mosaic of topographic features including canyons, plateaus, rolling grasslands and outcrops supports a diverse flora. Eight hundred twenty six (826) species of vascular plant species representing 81 plant families are known to occur on or near these public lands. This report includes a history of the area; ethnobotanical information; an introductory overview of the area including its climate, geology, vegetation, habitats, fauna, and ecological history; and a plant survey and information about the rare, poisonous, and exotic species from the area. A vascular plant checklist of 816 vascular plant taxa in the appendix includes scientific and common names, habitat types, and general distribution data for each species. This list is based on extensive plant collections and available herbarium collections. Authors Donald L. Hazlett is an ethnobotanist, Director of New World Plants and People consulting, and a research associate at the Denver Botanic Gardens, Denver, CO.
    [Show full text]
  • A POCKET GUIDE to Kansas Red Hills Wildflowers
    A POCKET GUIDE TO Kansas Red Hills Wildflowers ■ ■ ■ ■ By Ken Brunson, Phyllis Scherich, Chris Berens, and Carl Jarboe Sponsored by Chickadee Checkoff, Westar Energy Green Team, The Nature Conservancy in Kansas, Kansas Grazing Lands Coalition and Comanche Pool Prairie Resource Foundation Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center Table of Contents • Introduction • 2 Blue/Purple ■ Oklahoma Phlox • 6 ■ Twist-flower • 7 ■ Blue Funnel-lily • 8 ■ Purple Poppy Mallow • 9 ■ Prairie Spiderwort • 10 ■ Purple Ground Cherry • 11 ■ Purple Locoweed • 12 ■ Stevens’ Nama • 13 ■ Woolly Locoweed • 14 Easter Daisy ■ Wedge-leaf Frog Fruit • 15 ©Phyllis Scherich ■ Silver-leaf Nightshade • 16 Cover Photo: Bush ■ Prairie Gentian • 17 Morning-glory ■ Woolly Verbena • 18 ©Phyllis Scherich ■ Stout Scorpion-weed • 19 Pink/Red ■ Rayless Gaillardia • 20 ■ Velvety Gaura • 21 ■ Western Indigo • 22 ■ Pincushion Cactus • 23 ■ Scarlet Gaura • 24 ■ Bush Morning-glory • 25 ■ Indian Blanket Flower • 26 ■ Clammy-weed • 27 ■ Goat’s Rue • 28 White/Cream Easter Daisy • 29 Old Plainsman • 30 White Aster • 31 Western Spotted Beebalm • 32 Lazy Daisy • 33 Prickly Poppy • 34 White Beardtongue • 35 Yucca • 36 White Flower Ipomopsis • 37 Stenosiphon • 38 White Milkwort • 39 Annual Eriogonum • 40 Devil’s Claw • 41 Ten-petal Mentzelia • 42 Yellow/Orange ■ Slender Fumewort • 43 ■ Bladderpod • 44 ■ Indian Blanket Stiffstem Flax • 45 Flower ■ Lemon Paintbrush • 46 ©Phyllis Scherich ■ Hartweg Evening Primrose • 47 ■ Prairie Coneflower • 48 ■ Rocky Mountain
    [Show full text]
  • Canyons of the Ancients National Monument Plant List by Genus
    Canyons of the Ancients National Monument Plant List Please send all corrections and updates to Al Schneider, [email protected] Updated 6/2011 Scientific Name Common name Family Abronia fragrans Sand-verbena Nyctaginaceae Achillea lanulosa Western yarrow Asteraceae Achnatherum hymenoides Indian ricegrass Poaceae Achnatherum speciosum Showy needle grass Poaceae Acosta diffusa Tumble knapweed Asteraceae Acosta maculosa Spotted knapweed Asteraceae Acrolasia albicaulis Whitestem blazingstar Loasaceae Acroptilon repens Russian knapweed Asteraceae Adenolinum lewisii Blue Flax Linaceae Adiantum capillus-veneris Venus' hair fern Adiantaceae Agropyron cristatum Crested wheatgrass Poaceae Agrostis scabra Rough bentgrass Poaceae Agrostis stolonifera Redtop bentgrass Poaceae Allium acuminatum Tapertip onion Alliaceae Allium macropetalum Largeflower wild onion Alliaceae Allium textile Textile onion Alliaceae Alyssum minus Yellow alyssum Brassicaceae Amaranthus blitoides Prostrate pigweed Amaranthaceae Amaranthus retroflexus Redroot amaranth Amaranthaceae Ambrosia acanthicarpa Flatspine burr ragweed Asteraceae Ambrosia trifida great ragweed Asteraceae Amelanchier alnifolia? Saskatoon serviceberry Rosaceae Amelanchier utahensis Utah serviceberry Rosaceae Amsonia jonesii Jones's bluestar Apocynaceae Androsace occidentalis Western rockjasmine Primulaceae Androsace septentrionalis Pygmyflower rockjasmine Primulaceae Androstephium breviflorum Pink funnellily Alliaceae Anisantha tectorum Cheatgrass Poaceae Antennaria rosulata Rosy pussytoes Asteraceae
    [Show full text]
  • Petrified Forest U.S
    National Park Service Petrified Forest U.S. Department of the Interior Petrified Forest National Park Arizona Common Plants The environment of Petrified Forest is amazingly diverse, from the open grassland to the intimacy of a small seep spring. Types of plants change with the various habitats, such as the open woodlands along the Painted Desert Rim and mesa tops with juniper, crispleaf buckwheat, and cliffroses while grasses like needle and thread and sideoats grama dominate the open prairie. Animals depend on plants for food and shelter. People enjoy the shade beneath rustling cottonwoods and the beauty of Within each category, species are wildflowers. Unfortunately, some native plants are threatened by invasive non-native listed alphabetically by scientific weeds, including tamarix and bindweed, an issue both within the park and beyond name. Non-native, often noxious its boundaries. With thousands of species of plants in the park, only a sampling of and invasive, plants are marked with an *. species is featured here. Trees Elaeagnus angustifolia* Russian olive Salix exigua narrow leaf willow, coyote willow Juniperus monosperma one seed juniper Salix gooddingii Goodding’s willow Juniperus osteosperma Utah juniper Tamarix chinensis* fivestamen tamarix, saltcedar Pinus edulis twoneedle pinyon, pinyon pine Populus angustifoia narrowleaf cottonwood Populus deltoides ssp. wislizeni Fremont cottonwood Populus fremontii Fremont cottonwood One seed juniper Shrubs Artemisia bigelovii Bigelow’s sage Krascheninnikovia lanata winterfat Artemisia filifoliasand sagebrush Lycium pallidum pale wolfberry Atriplex canescens fourwing saltbush Purshia stansburiana Stansbury cliffrose Atriplex confertifolia shadescale saltbush Poliomintha incana hoary rosemarymint Chrysothamnus greenei Greene’s rabbitbrush Rhus trilobata skunkbush sumac Ephedra viridis Mormon tea Salsola tragus* prickly Russian thistle, tumbleweed Ericameria nauseosa ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Playa Wetlands in Northeastern New Mexico
    Playa Wetlands in Northeastern New Mexico A Comparative Study of Vegetation Diversity and Ecology Modified N Edge of playa bottom Transect A (100m, 50°) Transect B (100m, 230°) Not Modified Dirt piles N Stock Tank Transect B (100m, 340°) Some erosion Saline on slopes Transect A (100m, 140°) water Transect B (122m, 280°) Edge of playa bottom playa bottom - barren Transect A (203m, 210°) Edge of playa bottom Slope with wetland and alkaline indicators Playa Wetlands in Northeast New Mexico A Comparative Study of Vegetation Diversity and Ecology 1 Sarah Wood and Esteban Muldavin New Mexico Natural Heritage Program, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131 May, 2000 ______________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY In the arid and semi-arid lands of New Mexico, playa basins dependent on seasonal precipitation are vitally important resources for wildlife (particularly migratory birds), livestock and humans. In many cases, they have been physically or chemically modified as a result of or to accommodate farming, ranching, or oil development activities. Playa modification can disrupt hydrological regimes, which in turn may affect water chemistry, species composition, and ecological function. To gain a better understanding of the ecology and biological status of these important resources, the New Mexico Natural Heritage Program (NMNHP) and the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) Surface Water Quality Bureau conducted a comparative study of vegetation communities, water quality and invertebrates among relatively natural freshwater or saline playas and those that have been modified for ranching purposes in northeastern New Mexico rangeland during the fall of 1998. In particular, we looked at vegetation and soil zonation patterns within twelve selected playa basins.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) # 25 2016 Issn 2372-9449
    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) # 25 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 ERNEST J. OSLAR, 1858-1944: HIS TRAVEL AND COLLECTION ITINERARY, AND HIS BUTTERFLIES by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. Ernest John Oslar collected more than 50,000 butterflies and moths and other insects and sold them to many taxonomists and museums throughout the world. This paper attempts to determine his travels in America to collect those specimens, by using data from labeled specimens (most in his remaining collection but some from published papers) plus information from correspondence etc. and a few small field diaries preserved by his descendants. The butterfly specimens and their localities/dates in his collection in the C. P. Gillette Museum (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado) are detailed. This information will help determine the possible collection locations of Oslar specimens that lack accurate collection data. Many more biographical details of Oslar are revealed, and the 26 insects named for Oslar are detailed. Introduction The last collection of Ernest J. Oslar, ~2159 papered butterfly specimens and several moths, was found in the C. P. Gillette Museum, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado by Paul A. Opler, providing the opportunity to study his travels and collections. Scott & Fisher (2014) documented specimens sent by Ernest J. Oslar of about 100 Argynnis (Speyeria) nokomis nokomis Edwards labeled from the San Juan Mts. and Hall Valley of Colorado, which were collected by Wilmatte Cockerell at Beulah New Mexico, and documented Oslar’s specimens of Oeneis alberta oslari Skinner labeled from Deer Creek Canyon, [Jefferson County] Colorado, September 25, 1909, which were collected in South Park, Park Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeffrey James Keeling Sul Ross State University Box C-64 Alpine, Texas 79832-0001, U.S.A
    AN ANNOTATED VASCULAR FLORA AND FLORISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTHERN HALF OF THE NATURE CONSERVANCY DAVIS MOUNTAINS PRESERVE, JEFF DAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, U.S.A. Jeffrey James Keeling Sul Ross State University Box C-64 Alpine, Texas 79832-0001, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT The Nature Conservancy Davis Mountains Preserve (DMP) is located 24.9 mi (40 km) northwest of Fort Davis, Texas, in the northeastern region of the Chihuahuan Desert and consists of some of the most complex topography of the Davis Mountains, including their summit, Mount Livermore, at 8378 ft (2554 m). The cool, temperate, “sky island” ecosystem caters to the requirements that are needed to accommo- date a wide range of unique diversity, endemism, and vegetation patterns, including desert grasslands and montane savannahs. The current study began in May of 2011 and aimed to catalogue the entire vascular flora of the 18,360 acres of Nature Conservancy property south of Highway 118 and directly surrounding Mount Livermore. Previous botanical investigations are presented, as well as biogeographic relation- ships of the flora. The numbers from herbaria searches and from the recent field collections combine to a total of 2,153 voucher specimens, representing 483 species and infraspecies, 288 genera, and 87 families. The best-represented families are Asteraceae (89 species, 18.4% of the total flora), Poaceae (76 species, 15.7% of the total flora), and Fabaceae (21 species, 4.3% of the total flora). The current study represents a 25.44% increase in vouchered specimens and a 9.7% increase in known species from the study area’s 18,360 acres and describes four en- demic and fourteen non-native species (four invasive) on the property.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION 4 Delaware Road, Morristown, NJ 07960
    NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION 4 Delaware Road, Morristown, NJ 07960 tel. 973-285-0907 fax 973-285-0936 web: www.naba.org 41st ANNUAL NABA BUTTERFLY COUNT - 2015 INSTRUCTIONS (CANADA) COUNTERS & COUNT CIRCLES Please report your 2015 count results directly to NABA through Unless your count is an existing 1st of July count started before our online count form at www.naba.org. The online form 2008, at least 4 adult observers must participate. One or more allows compilers to enter all data for their counts through the groups of counters always produce better results. It is usually Web and also allows the regional editors to review and edit the desirable to visit several habitats and areas within a count circle, reports more efficiently. Most importantly, Butterfly Count which may be done best by several parties. Since counts are information will be entered and stored in a database which in the open for public participation, we encourage you to publicize future will allow it to be available online to NABA members your count plans! and the public. All compilers are now requested to enter the data A count is held at one or more selected sites within a for their counts through the online count form. If this presents 15-mile diameter CIRCLE. Groups starting a new count MUST any difficulty, please contact NABA for assistance. designate this 15-mile diameter circle. No count circles may overlap—that is, count centers must be a minimum of 15 miles COUNT PROGRAM OVERVIEW apart. Groups repeating a count held a previous year MUST use In order to encourage increased participation in the NABA the same circle, and count the same sites and habitats as before Butterfly Count Program and to encourage even more so far as practical.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Butterfly Association
    NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION 4 Delaware Road, Morristown, NJ 07960 tel. 973-285-0907 fax 973-285-0936 web: www.naba.org ANNUAL NABA BUTTERFLY COUNT - INSTRUCTIONS (USA) This printed count forms is for field use only. All counts must submit their results using the online data entry system. Please contact the NABA Count Program if you have questions or concerns. Please report your count results directly to NABA Timing/Requirements for United through our online count form at www.butterflycounts.org. Stated Counts The online form allows compilers to enter all data for their Count NABA 4th of July Butterfly Count: A minimum of four counts through the Web and also allows the regional editors adult observers AND 6 party-hours per count are Date of REQUIRED for all counts started after 2008; and, to review and edit the reports efficiently. Most importantly, June or except in extenuating circumstances, ALL counts should Butterfly Count information will be entered and stored in a July expend at least 6 party-hours of effort. database which in the future will allow it to be available Count online to NABA members and the public. If entering your Date other NABA Seasonal Butterfly Count: A minimum of four adult observers AND 6 party-hours per count is data through the online count form presents any difficulty, than June REQUIRED. please contact NABA for assistance. or July COUNT PROGRAM OVERVIEW DATE OF NEXT YEAR'S COUNT In order to encourage increased participation in the Please contact NABA (at address/phone above, or e-mail NABA Butterfly Count Program and to encourage even more to ) with the date of your next year's monitoring possibilities, the NABA Board of Directors [email protected] authorized the introduction of Seasonal Butterfly Counts in count and information on how to contact the compiler.
    [Show full text]