A Simplified 2D Model for Meander Migration with Physically-Based

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Simplified 2D Model for Meander Migration with Physically-Based Geomorphology 163–164 (2012) 10–25 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph A simplified 2D model for meander migration with physically-based bank evolution Davide Motta a,⁎, Jorge D. Abad b, Eddy J. Langendoen c, Marcelo H. Garcia a a Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States b Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, United States c US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, MS, 38655, United States article info abstract Article history: The rate of migration, calculated by numerical models of river meandering, is commonly based on a method Received 1 July 2010 that relates the rate of migration to near-bank excess velocity multiplied by a dimensionless coefficient. Received in revised form 18 January 2011 Notwithstanding its simplicity, since the early 1980s this method has provided important insight into the Accepted 1 June 2011 long-term evolution of meander planforms through theoretical exercises. Its use in practice has not been as Available online 16 August 2011 successful, because the complexity of the physical processes responsible for bank retreat, the heterogeneity in floodplain soils, and the presence of vegetation, make the calibration of the dimensionless coefficient rather Keywords: Meander migration challenging. This paper presents a new approach that calculates rates of meander migration using physically- Migration coefficient based streambank erosion formulations. The University of Illinois RVR Meander model, which simulates Bank erosion meandering-river flow and bed morphodynamics, is integrated with algorithms for streambank erosion of the Planform shape US Department of Agriculture channel evolution computer model CONCEPTS. The performance of the Computer model proposed approach is compared to that of the more simple classic method through the application to several test cases for idealized and natural planform geometry. The advantages and limitations of the approach are discussed, focusing on simulated planform pattern, the impact of soil spatial heterogeneity, the relative importance of the different processes controlling bank erosion (hydraulic erosion, cantilever, and planar failure), the requirements for obtaining stable migration patterns (centerline filtering and interpolation of bank physical properties), and the capability of predicting the planform evolution of natural rivers over engineering time scales (i.e., 50 to 100 years). The applications show that the improved physically-based method of bank retreat is required to capture the complex long-term migration patterns of natural channels, which cannot be merely predicted from hydrodynamics only. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction difference between bed and bank material particle sizes. Bed load is quantified using empirical formulations (Garcia, 2008), and its The modeling of meandering-river migration requires the simu- direction is determined by the near-bed flow direction corrected by lation of the following processes: hydrodynamics, sediment transport, the effect of bed slopes (Seminara and Tubino, 1989; Kovacs and bed morphodynamics, and bank erosion. The hydrodynamic modeling Parker, 1994; Talmon et al., 1995; Mosselman, 2005; Abad et al., resolves the mean and turbulent flow fields: e.g., primary and 2008). The suspended load is calculated using an advection–diffusion secondary flows, Reynolds stresses, and turbulent kinetic energy equation, where the diffusion coefficient is related to the turbulence among other hydrodynamic parameters. In bends, curvature-driven characteristics of the flow (Lyn, 2008). Abad et al. (2008) show the (Prandtl's first kind) and turbulence-driven (Prandtl's second kind) application of this methodology for the case of laboratory meandering secondary flow can be present and alter the morphology of the bed channels. and banks, which then affects the anisotropy of the flow (Akahori and Modeling of the bed morphodynamics provides the bed morphol- Schmeeckle, 2002; Blanckaert and de Vriend, 2005). Because the shear ogy at different spatial scales, which allows for reproducing the stresses exerted by the flow on the bed and banks control the erosion feedback between bed structures and flow field (Best, 2005), like the and transport of the boundary materials, their modeling is critical. disruption of secondary flows because of migrating bedforms (Abad Modeling of the sediment transport in meandering streams et al., 2010) and the interactions between suspended sediment simulates the transport of sediments as a combination of bed and particles and bed morphology (Schmeeckle et al., 1999). suspended load, because of the complex flow and the possible large Modeling bank erosion allows for simulating the migration of the meandering channel, which in turn affects hydrodynamics, sediment transport and bed morphodynamics. In a bend, faster and deeper flow ⁎ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (D. Motta), [email protected] (J.D. Abad), develops near the outer bank, which causes bank erosion (Thomson, [email protected] (E.J. Langendoen), [email protected] (M.H. Garcia). 1879). At the inner bank, a point bar commonly forms and promotes 0169-555X/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.036 D. Motta et al. / Geomorphology 163–164 (2012) 10–25 11 bank accretion. Widening in meandering channels may happen when assessment studies, using the classic migration method, will accu- outer bank retreat exceeds the rate of accretion of the opposite bank rately simulate the response of meandering streams to in-stream and (Nanson and Hickin, 1983). riparian management practices over engineering time scales (that is, a Models of different degrees of sophistication have been used to few years to decades or, in general, periods before cutoff occurrence). simulate freely meandering channels. For example, Ruether and Olsen A new physically-based approach is, therefore, needed, which (2007) performed three-dimensional (3D) numerical modeling using explicitly relates meander migration to the processes controlling Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations, a k−ε model for streambank erosion. turbulence, an advection–diffusion equation for suspended sediment, This paper presents a new modeling approach that merges the and van Rijn's (1984) formulation for bed load. Bolla Pittaluga et al. functionalities of the RVR Meander toolbox (Abad and Garcia, 2006), (2009) developed a 3D analytical model for low-sinuosity meanders which is a 2D long-term meander migration model based on Ikeda et and steady bed morphology. These models need coupling with bank al.'s (1981) model, with the physically-based streambank erosion erosion and meander evolution submodels, however, to simulate algorithms of the CONCEPTS (CONservational Channel Evolution and planform changes for engineering and geological time scales. Pollutant Transport System) channel evolution model (Langendoen Two-dimensional (2D) analytical models for long-term river and Alonso, 2008; Langendoen and Simon, 2008; Langendoen et al., migration, again valid for low-sinuosity meanders and steady bed 2009). Darby et al. (2002) and Rinaldi et al. (2008) carried out similar morphology, were developed, among others, by Ikeda et al. (1981), efforts, however, only for short reaches and simulation periods. The Blondeaux and Seminara (1985), Johannesson and Parker (1989b), paper describes the new physically-based methodology for comput- Howard (1992, 1996), Sun et al. (1996, 2001), Zolezzi and Seminara ing river migration and presents model tests for idealized (sine- (2001), and Lancaster and Bras (2002). These models calculate the generated and Kinoshita curve) and observed planforms. The rate of migration based on a method independently introduced by computed planform evolution is compared to that obtained with the Hasegawa (1977) and Ikeda et al. (1981). This method relates the rate classic method based on a migration coefficient. of migration to the near-bank excess velocity multiplied by a dimensionless coefficient, and is referred to as the classic or MC 2. Model description (Migration Coefficient) approach hereafter. The dimensionless coef- ficient is obtained by means of calibration against field data and is The modeling platform is composed of two main components. The typically a very small number (10− 7–10− 8). From a theoretical first component simulates the hydrodynamics and bed morphody- perspective, this method has provided fundamental insight into the namics. The second component simulates the channel migration. planform evolution of meandering channels, but it has not been as Because the main goal of this paper is to evaluate the performance of successful in practical applications, where the calibration of the the new approach for bank retreat as compared to the classic method, dimensionless coefficient can be challenging and unable to capture it is coupled with a simple physically-based analytical model for the observed migration patterns. Constantine et al. (2009) sought to hydrodynamics and bed morphodynamics of meandering streams, establish a relation between the migration coefficient and measurable which is based on the model of Ikeda et al. (1981). physical characteristics of the materials of the channel boundary using data from
Recommended publications
  • Lesson 4: Sediment Deposition and River Structures
    LESSON 4: SEDIMENT DEPOSITION AND RIVER STRUCTURES ESSENTIAL QUESTION: What combination of factors both natural and manmade is necessary for healthy river restoration and how does this enhance the sustainability of natural and human communities? GUIDING QUESTION: As rivers age and slow they deposit sediment and form sediment structures, how are sediments and sediment structures important to the river ecosystem? OVERVIEW: The focus of this lesson is the deposition and erosional effects of slow-moving water in low gradient areas. These “mature rivers” with decreasing gradient result in the settling and deposition of sediments and the formation sediment structures. The river’s fast-flowing zone, the thalweg, causes erosion of the river banks forming cliffs called cut-banks. On slower inside turns, sediment is deposited as point-bars. Where the gradient is particularly level, the river will branch into many separate channels that weave in and out, leaving gravel bar islands. Where two meanders meet, the river will straighten, leaving oxbow lakes in the former meander bends. TIME: One class period MATERIALS: . Lesson 4- Sediment Deposition and River Structures.pptx . Lesson 4a- Sediment Deposition and River Structures.pdf . StreamTable.pptx . StreamTable.pdf . Mass Wasting and Flash Floods.pptx . Mass Wasting and Flash Floods.pdf . Stream Table . Sand . Reflection Journal Pages (printable handout) . Vocabulary Notes (printable handout) PROCEDURE: 1. Review Essential Question and introduce Guiding Question. 2. Hand out first Reflection Journal page and have students take a minute to consider and respond to the questions then discuss responses and questions generated. 3. Handout and go over the Vocabulary Notes. Students will define the vocabulary words as they watch the PowerPoint Lesson.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandbridge Beach FONSI
    FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Issuance of a Negotiated Agreement for Use of Outer Continental Shelf Sand from Sandbridge Shoal in the Sandbridge Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project Virginia Beach, Virginia Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Council on Environmental Quality regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508) and Department of the Interior (DOI) regulations implementing NEPA (43 CFR 46), the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) prepared an environmental assessment (EA) to determine whether the issuance of a negotiated agreement for the use of Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) sand from Sandbridge Shoal Borrow Areas A and B for the Sandbridge Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project near Virginia Beach, VA would have a significant effect on the human environment and whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) should be prepared. Several NEPA documents evaluating impacts of the project have been previously prepared by both the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and BOEM. The USACE described the affected environment, evaluated potential environmental impacts (initial construction and nourishment events), and considered alternatives to the proposed action in a 2009 EA. This EA was subsequently updated and adopted by BOEM in 2012 in association with the most recent 2013 Sandbridge nourishment effort (BOEM 2012). Prior to this, BOEM (previously Minerals Management Service [MMS]) was a cooperating agency on several EAs for previous projects (MMS 1997; MMS 2001; MMS 2006). This current EA, prepared by BOEM, supplements and summarizes the aforementioned 2012 analysis. BOEM has reviewed all prior analyses, supplemented additional information as needed, and determined that the potential impacts of the current proposed action have been adequately addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • River Dynamics 101 - Fact Sheet River Management Program Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
    River Dynamics 101 - Fact Sheet River Management Program Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Overview In the discussion of river, or fluvial systems, and the strategies that may be used in the management of fluvial systems, it is important to have a basic understanding of the fundamental principals of how river systems work. This fact sheet will illustrate how sediment moves in the river, and the general response of the fluvial system when changes are imposed on or occur in the watershed, river channel, and the sediment supply. The Working River The complex river network that is an integral component of Vermont’s landscape is created as water flows from higher to lower elevations. There is an inherent supply of potential energy in the river systems created by the change in elevation between the beginning and ending points of the river or within any discrete stream reach. This potential energy is expressed in a variety of ways as the river moves through and shapes the landscape, developing a complex fluvial network, with a variety of channel and valley forms and associated aquatic and riparian habitats. Excess energy is dissipated in many ways: contact with vegetation along the banks, in turbulence at steps and riffles in the river profiles, in erosion at meander bends, in irregularities, or roughness of the channel bed and banks, and in sediment, ice and debris transport (Kondolf, 2002). Sediment Production, Transport, and Storage in the Working River Sediment production is influenced by many factors, including soil type, vegetation type and coverage, land use, climate, and weathering/erosion rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Restoration, a Natural Channel Design
    Stream Restoration Prep8AICI by the North Carolina Stream Restonltlon Institute and North Carolina Sea Grant INC STATE UNIVERSITY I North Carolina State University and North Carolina A&T State University commit themselves to positive action to secure equal opportunity regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, religion, sex, age or disability. In addition, the two Universities welcome all persons without regard to sexual orientation. Contents Introduction to Fluvial Processes 1 Stream Assessment and Survey Procedures 2 Rosgen Stream-Classification Systems/ Channel Assessment and Validation Procedures 3 Bankfull Verification and Gage Station Analyses 4 Priority Options for Restoring Incised Streams 5 Reference Reach Survey 6 Design Procedures 7 Structures 8 Vegetation Stabilization and Riparian-Buffer Re-establishment 9 Erosion and Sediment-Control Plan 10 Flood Studies 11 Restoration Evaluation and Monitoring 12 References and Resources 13 Appendices Preface Streams and rivers serve many purposes, including water supply, The authors would like to thank the following people for reviewing wildlife habitat, energy generation, transportation and recreation. the document: A stream is a dynamic, complex system that includes not only Micky Clemmons the active channel but also the floodplain and the vegetation Rockie English, Ph.D. along its edges. A natural stream system remains stable while Chris Estes transporting a wide range of flows and sediment produced in its Angela Jessup, P.E. watershed, maintaining a state of "dynamic equilibrium." When Joseph Mickey changes to the channel, floodplain, vegetation, flow or sediment David Penrose supply significantly affect this equilibrium, the stream may Todd St. John become unstable and start adjusting toward a new equilibrium state.
    [Show full text]
  • Logistic Analysis of Channel Pattern Thresholds: Meandering, Braiding, and Incising
    Geomorphology 38Ž. 2001 281–300 www.elsevier.nlrlocatergeomorph Logistic analysis of channel pattern thresholds: meandering, braiding, and incising Brian P. Bledsoe), Chester C. Watson 1 Department of CiÕil Engineering, Colorado State UniÕersity, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA Received 22 April 2000; received in revised form 10 October 2000; accepted 8 November 2000 Abstract A large and geographically diverse data set consisting of meandering, braiding, incising, and post-incision equilibrium streams was used in conjunction with logistic regression analysis to develop a probabilistic approach to predicting thresholds of channel pattern and instability. An energy-based index was developed for estimating the risk of channel instability associated with specific stream power relative to sedimentary characteristics. The strong significance of the 74 statistical models examined suggests that logistic regression analysis is an appropriate and effective technique for associating basic hydraulic data with various channel forms. The probabilistic diagrams resulting from these analyses depict a more realistic assessment of the uncertainty associated with previously identified thresholds of channel form and instability and provide a means of gauging channel sensitivity to changes in controlling variables. q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Channel stability; Braiding; Incision; Stream power; Logistic regression 1. Introduction loads, loss of riparian habitat because of stream bank erosion, and changes in the predictability and vari- Excess stream power may result in a transition ability of flow and sediment transport characteristics from a meandering channel to a braiding or incising relative to aquatic life cyclesŽ. Waters, 1995 . In channel that is characteristically unstableŽ Schumm, addition, braiding and incising channels frequently 1977; Werritty, 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Management of the River Dee
    THEBIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OFTHE RIVERDEE INSTITUTEofTERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY NATURALENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL á Natural Environment Research Council INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY The biology and management of the River Dee Edited by DAVID JENKINS Banchory Research Station Hill of Brathens, Glassel BANCHORY Kincardineshire 2 Printed in Great Britain by The Lavenham Press Ltd, Lavenham, Suffolk NERC Copyright 1985 Published in 1985 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Administrative Headquarters Monks Wood Experimental Station Abbots Ripton HUNTINGDON PE17 2LS BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATIONDATA The biology and management of the River Dee.—(ITE symposium, ISSN 0263-8614; no. 14) 1. Stream ecology—Scotland—Dee River 2. Dee, River (Grampian) I. Jenkins, D. (David), 1926– II. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Ill. Series 574.526323'094124 OH141 ISBN 0 904282 88 0 COVER ILLUSTRATION River Dee west from Invercauld, with the high corries and plateau of 1196 m (3924 ft) Beinn a'Bhuird in the background marking the watershed boundary (Photograph N Picozzi) The centre pages illustrate part of Grampian Region showing the water shed of the River Dee. Acknowledgements All the papers were typed by Mrs L M Burnett and Mrs E J P Allen, ITE Banchory. Considerable help during the symposium was received from Dr N G Bayfield, Mr J W H Conroy and Mr A D Littlejohn. Mrs L M Burnett and Mrs J Jenkins helped with the organization of the symposium. Mrs J King checked all the references and Mrs P A Ward helped with the final editing and proof reading. The photographs were selected by Mr N Picozzi. The symposium was planned by a steering committee composed of Dr D Jenkins (ITE), Dr P S Maitland (ITE), Mr W M Shearer (DAES) and Mr J A Forster (NCC).
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Effective Stream Power and Bank Erosion on the Sacramento River, California, Usa1
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION AUGUST AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION 2006 CUMULATIVE EFFECTIVE STREAM POWER AND BANK EROSION ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER, CALIFORNIA, USA1 Eric W. Larsen, Alexander K. Fremier, and Steven E. Greco2 ABSTRACT: Bank erosion along a river channel determines the INTRODUCTION pattern of channel migration. Lateral channel migration in large alluvial rivers creates new floodplain land that is essential for Natural rivers and their surrounding areas consti- riparian vegetation to get established. Migration also erodes tute some of the world’s most diverse, dynamic, and existing riparian, agricultural, and urban lands, sometimes complex terrestrial ecosystems (Naiman et al., 1993). damaging human infrastructure (e.g., scouring bridge founda- Land deposition on the inside bank of a curved river tions and endangering pumping facilities) in the process. channel is a process that creates opportunities for Understanding what controls the rate of bank erosion and asso- vegetation to colonize the riparian corridor (Hupp and ciated point bar deposition is necessary to manage large allu- Osterkamp, 1996; Mahoney and Rood, 1998). Point vial rivers effectively. In this study, bank erosion was bar deposition and outside bank erosion are tightly proportionally related to the magnitude of stream power. Linear coupled. These physical processes (which constitute regressions were used to correlate the cumulative stream channel migration) maintain ecosystem heterogeneity power, above a lower flow threshold, with rates of bank erosion in floodplains over space and time (Malanson, 1993). at 13 sites on the middle Sacramento River in California. Two Channel migration structures and sustains riparian forms of data were used: aerial photography and field data.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Moment of Erosion
    Earth Surface Processes and Landforms EarthDefining Surf. the Process. moment Landforms of erosion 30, 1597–1615 (2005) 1597 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/esp.1234 Defining the moment of erosion: the principle of thermal consonance timing D. M. Lawler* School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK *Correspondence to: Abstract D. M. Lawler, School of Geography, Earth and Geomorphological process research demands quantitative information on erosion and deposi- Environmental Sciences, tion event timing and magnitude, in relation to fluctuations in the suspected driving forces. University of Birmingham, This paper establishes a new measurement principle – thermal consonance timing (TCT) Birmingham B15 2TT. – which delivers clearer, more continuous and quantitative information on erosion and E-mail: [email protected] deposition event magnitude, timing and frequency, to assist understanding of the controlling mechanisms. TCT is based on monitoring the switch from characteristically strong tempera- ture gradients in sediment, to weaker gradients in air or water, which reveals the moment of erosion. The paper (1) derives the TCT principle from soil micrometeorological theory; (2) illustrates initial concept operationalization for field and laboratory use; (3) presents experimental data for simple soil erosion simulations; and (4) discusses initial application of TCT and perifluvial micrometeorology principles in the delivery of timing solutions for two bank erosion events on the River Wharfe, UK, in relation to the hydrograph. River bank thermal regimes respond, as soil temperature and energy balance theory pre- dicts, with strong horizontal thermal gradients (often >>>1Kcm−−−1 over 6·8 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development
    Classifying Rivers - Three Stages of River Development River Characteristics - Sediment Transport - River Velocity - Terminology The illustrations below represent the 3 general classifications into which rivers are placed according to specific characteristics. These categories are: Youthful, Mature and Old Age. A Rejuvenated River, one with a gradient that is raised by the earth's movement, can be an old age river that returns to a Youthful State, and which repeats the cycle of stages once again. A brief overview of each stage of river development begins after the images. A list of pertinent vocabulary appears at the bottom of this document. You may wish to consult it so that you will be aware of terminology used in the descriptive text that follows. Characteristics found in the 3 Stages of River Development: L. Immoor 2006 Geoteach.com 1 Youthful River: Perhaps the most dynamic of all rivers is a Youthful River. Rafters seeking an exciting ride will surely gravitate towards a young river for their recreational thrills. Characteristically youthful rivers are found at higher elevations, in mountainous areas, where the slope of the land is steeper. Water that flows over such a landscape will flow very fast. Youthful rivers can be a tributary of a larger and older river, hundreds of miles away and, in fact, they may be close to the headwaters (the beginning) of that larger river. Upon observation of a Youthful River, here is what one might see: 1. The river flowing down a steep gradient (slope). 2. The channel is deeper than it is wide and V-shaped due to downcutting rather than lateral (side-to-side) erosion.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Soil Erosion? Soil Erosion by Wind Or Water Is the Physical Wearing Away of the Soil Surface
    Do you have a problem with: • Low yields • Time & expense to repair and gullies • Small rills and channels in your fields • Soil deposited at the base of slopes or along fence lines • Sediment in streams, lakes, and reservoirs Soil Erosion May be the Problem! Erosion from cropland What is soil erosion? Soil erosion by wind or water is the physical wearing away of the soil surface. Soil material and nutrients are removed in the process. Why be concerned? • Erosion reduces crop yields • Erosion removes topsoil, reduces soil organic matter, and destroys soil structure Signs of Erosion – Sediment entering river • Erosion decreases rooting depth • Erosion decreases the amount of water, air, and nutrients available to plants • Nutrients and sediment removed by water erosion cause water quality problems and fish kills • Blowing dust from wind erosion can affect human health and create public safety hazards • Increased production costs Erosion removes our richest soil. How much does it cost? • Technical assistance to assess and plan erosion control systems from NRCS is free • No till and mulch till may require special tillage equipment or planters if this equipment is not al- ready available • Vegetative barriers may cost $50-$100 per mile of barrier • Cover crops may cost between $10 and $40 per acre depending on the type of seed used Controlling Soil Erosion Signs of Erosion – Small rills and channels on the soil Dust clouds & “dirt devils” such as the one pictured surface are a sign of water erosion here are signs of wind erosion. How to Reduce Erosion: The key to reducing is erosion is to keep the soil covered as much as possible for both wind and water ero- sion concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 Water Has a Major Role in Shaping the Earth's Surface. Enduring
    4.3 Water has a major role in shaping the Earth’s surface. Enduring Understanding(s) Essential Questions (A) Water has a major role in shaping • How does water affect the Earth’s the Earth’s surface. surface? (B) Water moves in a predictable cycle. • Where does water come from? Where does it go? GRADE-LEVEL EXPECTATIONS: 1. Water is continuously moving between Earth’s surface and the atmosphere in a process called the water cycle. Water evaporates from the surface of the earth, rises into the air and cools, condenses, collects in clouds, and falls again to the surface as precipitation. The energy that causes the water cycle comes from the sun. 2. Most precipitation that falls to Earth goes directly into oceans. Some precipitation falls on land and accumulates in lakes and ponds or moves across the land. Rain or snowmelt in high elevations flows downhill in many streams which collect in lower elevations to form a river that flows downhill to an ocean. 3. Water moving across the earth in streams and rivers pushes along soil and breaks down pieces of rock in a process called erosion. The moving water carries away rock and soil from some areas and deposits them in other areas, creating new landforms or changing the course of a stream or river. 4. The amount of erosion in an area, and the type of earth material that is moved, are affected by the amount of moving water, the speed of the moving water, and by how much vegetation covers the area. 5. Rivers carve out valleys as they move between mountains or hills.
    [Show full text]
  • Floodplain Heterogeneity and Meander Migration
    River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics: RCEM2011 © 2011 Floodplain heterogeneity and meander migration MOTTA Davide Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA E-mail: [email protected] ABAD Jorge D. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA E-mail: [email protected] LANGENDOEN Eddy J. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, Mississippi, USA E-mail: [email protected] GARCIA Marcelo H. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The impact of horizontal heterogeneity of floodplain soils on rates and patterns of meander migration is analyzed with a Ikeda et al. (1981)-type model for hydrodynamics and bed morphodynamics, coupled with a physically-based bank erosion model according to the approach developed by Motta et al. (2011). We assume that rates of migration are determined by the resistance to hydraulic erosion of the soils, which is described by an excess shear stress relation. This relation uses two parameters characterizing the resistance to erosion: critical shear stress and erodibility coefficient. The spatial distribution of critical shear stress in the floodplain is generated on a regular grid with varying degree of randomness to mimic natural settings and the corresponding erodibility coefficient is computed with a relation derived from field-measured pairs of critical shear stress and erodibility. Centerline migration and associated statistics for randomly-disturbed distribution based on the distance from the valley axis are compared for sine-generated centerline using the Monte Carlo method.
    [Show full text]