Why Bounded Rationality? Author(S): John Conlisk Source: Journal of Economic Literature, Vol

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why Bounded Rationality? Author(S): John Conlisk Source: Journal of Economic Literature, Vol American Economic Association Why Bounded Rationality? Author(s): John Conlisk Source: Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 34, No. 2 (Jun., 1996), pp. 669-700 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2729218 Accessed: 20/10/2008 21:54 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aea. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Economic Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Economic Literature. http://www.jstor.org Journal of Economic Literature Vol. XXXIV (June 1996), pp. 669-700 Why Bounded Rationality? JOHN CONLISK University of California, San Diego Special thanksfor editorial suggestions are due to Vincent Crawford, Garey Rainey, Michael Rothschild, and three most helpful referees. Very special thanks for many years of helpfui insights are due to Richard Day and Luigi Ermini. Hamlet: "What a piece of work is a man! how noble in reason! how infinite in faculties!" Hamlet, II.2.319. Puck: "Lord, whatfools these mortals be!" Midsummer Night's Dream, III.3.116. NEARLY EVERYONE would see the ring theme. Most references are to the truth as between Hamlet and Puck. last 15 years, though many earlier works Including Hamlet and Puck. Hamlet is are also cited. A longer version of the feigning madness, and Puck is just being, survey, including many more references, well, puckish. Model-writing economists, is available from the author on request. however, tend not to the middle but to the "infinite in faculties" extreme. Al- I. Spoiling a Good Story: Evidence of though the postulate of unbounded ra- Bounds on Rationality tionality has dominated economic model- ing for several decades, the dominance is Should the facts be allowed to spoil a good story? relaxing. Is this encouraging? Why Michael Lovell (1986, p. 120) bounded rationality? Lovell asked this question about un- In this survey, four reasons are given bounded rationality in forecasting (about for incorporating bounded rationality in rational expectations). We can ask it economic models. First, there is abun- about unbounded rationality in general. dant empirical evidence that it is impor- We know there are critical physiological tant. Second, models of bounded ratio- limits on human cognition (Herbert Si- nality have proved themselves in a wide mon 1990, p. 7), but are the limits im- range of impressive work. Third, the portant to economics? Do they spoil any standard justifications for assuming un- of the good story told by the standard bounded rationality are unconvincing; theory of optimizing behavior? To be their logic cuts both ways. Fourth, delib- clear, the question is not whether eration about an economic decision is a bounds on rationality are always impor- costly activity, and good economics re- tant. They are not; there are many con- quires that we entertain all costs. These texts in which the hypothesis of un- four reasons, or categories of reasons, bounded rationality surely works well. are developed in the following four sec- Rather the questions are whether,bounds tions. Deliberation cost will be a recur- on rationality are often enough impor- 669 670 Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXIV (June 1996) tant to include in economic analysis and, gerate confirming over disconfirming if so, when. evidence relative to initial beliefs; give The evidence sketched in this section answers that are highly sensitive to logi- will be put in two categories, direct evi- cally irrelevant changes in questions; do dence and confounded evidence, though redundant and ambiguous tests to con- the dividing line is vague. The "direct" firm an hypothesis at the expense of de- category will concern studies, mostly ex- cisive tests to disconfirm; make frequent perimental, which test economic ration- errors in deductive reasoning tasks such ality more or less directly by testing the as syllogisms; place higher value on an cognitive abilities relevant to economic opportunity if an experimenter rigs it to decisions. The "confounded" category be the "status quo" opportunity; fail to will concern tests in which rationality hy- discount the future consistently; fail to potheses are entertained jointly with adjust repeated choices to accommodate other hypotheses in economic settings. intertemporal connections; and more. In such experiments, the mental tasks A. Direct Evidence-Rationality Tests put to people are often simple, at least on Single Individuals relative to many economic decisions; There are many studies in which single whereas their responses are frequently individuals are faced with decisions way off. Most important, reasoning er- which have objectively correct answers rors are typically systematic. Psycholo- and which test the kinds of reasoning gists hypothesize that subjects make sys- frequently ascribed to agents in eco- tematic errors by using decision nomic theory. Do subjects do well in "heuristics,"or rules of thumb, which fail such tests? Often not. to accommodate the full logic of a deci- Hundreds of studies of this type have sion, as when a person makes systematic been done, mostly by psychologists but forecast errors by using adaptive rather more recently by experimental econo- than rational expectations. The system- mists also. There is a mountain of ex- atic errors are often referred to as "bi- periments in which people: display ases," and the general topic often carries intransitivity; misunderstand statistical the label "heuristics and biases." independence; mistake random data for The sheer number of experiments re- patterned data and vice versa; fail to ap- porting biases is so great that a sizable preciate law of large number effects; fail number of books and long survey papers to recognize statistical dominance; make have been written just to review the evi- errors in updating probabilities on the dence. For example, see the books by basis of new information; understate the Hal Arkes and Kenneth Hammond significance of given sample sizes; fail to (1986), Robin Hogarth (1980), Daniel understand covariation for even the sim- Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tver- plest 2X2 contingency tables; make false sky (1982), and Richard Nisbett and Lee inferences about causality; ignore rele- Ross (1980); and see the survey papers vant information; use irrelevant informa- by John Payne, James Bettman, and Eric tion (as in sunk cost fallacies); exaggerate Johnson (1992), Gordon Pitz and Natalie the importance of vivid over pallid evi- Sachs (1984), and Slovic, Sarah Lichten- dence; exaggerate the importance of fal- stein, and Baruch Fischhoff (1988). For lible predictors; exaggerate the ex ante mini-surveys aimed at economists, see probability of a random event which has George Loewenstein and Richard Thaler already occurred; display overconfidence (1989), Tversky and Thaler (1990), and in judgment relative to evidence; exag- Kahneman, Jack Knetsch, and Thaler Conlisk: Why Bounded Rationality? 671 (1991). For examples of bias experiments initial expertise, better opportunities to by economists, see David Grether and learn, and the like. Although such design Charles Plott (1979) on preference re- conditions do attenuate biases, the at- versals, Grether (1992) on Bayes rule tenuation is typically limited. The pre- tests, and John Sterman (1989) and Rich- vailing overall impression is that biases ard Herrnstein and Drazen Prelec (1991) are not fragile effects which easily disap- on suboptimal decisions in the face of pear, but rather substantial and impor- dynamic complications. tant behavioral regularities. On debias- At the same time that psychologists ing, see the discussions in Raymond view heuristics as a source of bias, they Battalio, John Kagel, and Komain Jiran- also view heuristics as critical to problem yakul (1990, p. 28), Berndt Brehmer solving (Rudolf Groner, Marina Groner, (1980), Grether (1992), Hogarth (1980, and Walter Bischof 1983; Allan Newell ch. 5), Fischhoff (1982), Nisbett and Simon 1990, section II; and Payne, and Ross (1980, pp. 251-54), Payne, Johnson, and Bettman 1993). At first Bettman, and Johnson (1992, pp. 106, glance, this seems puzzling. Why not 114-16), Robert Slonim (1994), and condemn problem solving which leads to Slovic, Lichtenstein, and Fischhoff systematic error? The answer is simple. (1988, pp. 683-85, 688-89). Deliberation cost. For a boundedly ra- As Vernon Smith (1989, 1991) and tional individual, heuristics often provide Smith and James Walker (1993) empha- an adequate solution cheaply whereas size, market discipline, through repeated more elaborate approaches would be un- transactions with significant stakes, can duly expensive. As Pitz and Sachs (1984, be potent in attenuating discrepancies p. 152) put it, "a tradeoff exists between between optimizing and observed behav- cognitive effort and judgmental accu- ior; whereas psychological studies of de- racy." It is ironic that this economic biasing typically do not include such tradeoff should be better recognized in market forces. However, Smith and psychology than in economics. Experi- Walker also emphasize that attenuation mental and selected other economists is a matter of degree.
Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Warning Signals on Individual Investors' Trading Behavior Empirical Evidence: a Randomized Experiment
    THE IMPACT OF WARNING SIGNALS ON INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS' TRADING BEHAVIOR EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE: A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT Aantal woorden: 18.770 words Ewout De Brauwer Sarah Goemaere Stamnummer: 01502737 Stamnummer: 01407713 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Koen Inghelbrecht Commissaris: Dhr. Nicolas Dierick Masterproef voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van: Master in de handelswetenschappen: finance en risicomanagement Academiejaar: 2018-2019 Deze pagina is niet beschikbaar omdat ze persoonsgegevens bevat. Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent, 2021. This page is not available because it contains personal information. Ghent Universit , Librar , 2021. Summary in Dutch Deze masterthesis heeft getracht te onderzoeken wat de impact is van waarschuwingssignalen op het handelsgedrag van individuele investeerders. Naar aanleiding van de financiële crisis in 2007-2009, werd de MiFID-wetgeving aanzienlijk verstrengd ter bescherming van de particuliere, vaak onwetende, investeerder. Beursvennootschappen of andere financiële tussenpersonen die beleggingsdiensten, zijnde vermogensbeheer en beleggingsadvies, aanbieden aan ‘retail investors’ zijn rechtswege verplicht een waarschuwingssignaal in de vorm van een negatief, neutraal of positief advies te verstrekken bij elke aankoop- en verkooptransactie die de cliënt wenst te verrichten (European Parliament; The Council, 2014). Hiervoor werd een experiment uiteengezet die een virtuele, financiële omgeving creëerde waar participanten investeringsbeslissingen konden nemen doorheen verschillende handelsperiodes. Participanten
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Greed and Fear Financial Management Association Survey and Synthesis Series
    Beyond Greed and Fear Financial Management Association Survey and Synthesis Series The Search for Value: Measuring the Company's Cost of Capital Michael C. Ehrhardt Managing Pension Plans: A Comprehensive Guide to Improving Plan Performance Dennis E. Logue and Jack S. Rader Efficient Asset Management: A Practical Guide to Stock Portfolio Optimization and Asset Allocation Richard O. Michaud Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World Martha Amram and Nalin Kulatilaka Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing Hersh Shefrin Dividend Policy: Its Impact on Form Value Ronald C. Lease, Kose John, Avner Kalay, Uri Loewenstein, and Oded H. Sarig Value Based Management: The Corporate Response to Shareholder Revolution John D. Martin and J. William Petty Debt Management: A Practitioner's Guide John D. Finnerty and Douglas R. Emery Real Estate Investment Trusts: Structure, Performance, and Investment Opportunities Su Han Chan, John Erickson, and Ko Wang Trading and Exchanges: Market Microstructure for Practitioners Larry Harris Beyond Greed and Fear Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing Hersh Shefrin 2002 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Bangkok Buenos Aires Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kolkata Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi São Paulo Shanghai Taipei Tokyo Toronto Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Copyright © 2002 by Oxford University Press, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Words from the Wise an AQR Interview with Richard Thaler
    July 2018 Words from the Wise An AQR Interview with Richard Thaler Richard Thaler, a founding father of behavioral finance and 2017 recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economics, discusses his pioneering research, including how our behaviors influence decision making and investing and what to do about it. This is the eighth in a series of Words from the Wise interviews to be published on AQR.com. Richard H. Thaler is the Charles R. Walgreen Distinguished Service Professor of Behavioral Science and Economics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. He was awarded the 2017 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his contributions to the field of behavioral economics. He is an author or editor of six books, including the recent Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics (2015), the global best seller (with Cass R. Sunstein) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (2008), The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life (1994), and Quasi-Rational Economics (1991). He is a member of the National Academy of Science and American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a fellow of the American Finance Association and the Econometrics Society, and served as the president of the American Economic Association in 2015. 02 Words from the Wise — Richard Thaler Additional articles in the AQR Words from the Wise interview series www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Interviews Jack Bogle Founder, Vanguard Group Charley Ellis Founder, Greenwich Associates Robert Engle Michael Armellino Professor of Finance, New York
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Essays on the Social Dimensions of Investor
    University of Groningen Essays on the social dimensions of investor behavior Hoffmann, Arvid Oskar Ivar IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2007 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Hoffmann, A. O. I. (2007). Essays on the social dimensions of investor behavior. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 05-10-2021 Essays on the Social Dimensions of Investor Behavior Arvid O. I. Hoffmann Publisher: A.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Economics and the Effects of Psychology on the Stock Market Justin L
    State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College Digital Commons at Buffalo State Applied Economics Theses Economics and Finance 5-2017 Behavioral Economics and the Effects of Psychology on the Stock Market Justin L. Nagy [email protected] Advisor Dr. Theodore Byrley First Reader Dr. Theodore Byrley Second Reader Dr. Frederick Floss Third Reader Dr. Xingwang Qian Department Chair Dr. Frederick Floss To learn more about the Economics and Finance Department and its educational programs, research, and resources, go to http://economics.buffalostate.edu/. Recommended Citation Nagy, Justin L., "Behavioral Economics and the Effects of Psychology on the Stock Market" (2017). Applied Economics Theses. 24. https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/economics_theses/24 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/economics_theses Part of the Behavioral Economics Commons Behavioral Economics and the Effects of Psychology on the Stock Market By Justin L. Nagy An Abstract of a Thesis In Applied Economics and Finance Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree, of Master of Arts 2017 Buffalo State College State University of New York Department of Economics and Finance i Abstract of Thesis Behavioral Economics and the Effects of Psychology on the Stock Market The purpose of this thesis is to study the contributions behavioral economics and finance have had on the understanding on how the stock market works. The idea that psychology plays a role in influencing the stock market can be dated back to Adam Smith who wrote about individual’s behavior in his work Theory of Moral Sentiments. It wasn’t until the latter half of the 20th century that behavioral economics became accepted as a counter to Eugene Fama’s widely accepted theory of Efficient Market Hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Slideshow: Collaborators and Friends
    Collaborators and Friends Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky Never enough Danny! Cass R. Sunstein Hersh Shefrin Thomas Russell Jack Knetsch Sherwin Rosen Shlomo Benartzi Roni Michaely Werner De Bondt Matthew Rabin Cade Massey Robyn Dawes Alan Schwartz Peter Wakker Maya Bar-Hillel Barbara Tversky Robert Cialdini Bob Frank Tom Gilovich Eric Johnson Eldar Shafir Shane Fredrick Suzanne Shu Yuval Rottenstreich David Schkade Baruch Fischhoff Paul Slovic Henrik Cronqvist Owen Lamont Robert Vishny Terry Odean Charles Lee Linda Ken Canina Froot Ming Alessandro Huang Previtero Linda Babcock Colin Camerer George Loewenstein Guido Thierry Baltussen Post Martijn Dennie van den van Dolder Assem Stefano DellaVigna Ulrike Malmendier Emir Kamenica Sendhil Mullainathan Dean Karlan Maya Shankar Russ Fuller Raife Giovinazzo Ernst Fehr Christine Jolls Nicholas Barberis Andrei Shleifer Navin Stephen Chopra Utkus Kent William Womack Ziemba Uri Gneezy Ted O’Donoghue Raj Chetty Justine Hastings Devin Pope David Laibson Jesse Shapiro Robert Shiller John Balz David Halpern Dilip Soman Victor Fuchs Eric Wanner Booth & CDR Family Booth & CDR Family Booth & CDR Family Michael Lewis (The Chronicler) Friends Friends Friends Friends The Next Generation And the Woman Behind It All France Leclerc with her eye for beauty in this world France Leclerc with her eye for beauty in this world France Leclerc with her eye for beauty in this world France Leclerc with her eye for beauty in this world .
    [Show full text]
  • Portfolio-Based Segmentation and Consumer Behavior
    PORTFOLIO-BASED SEGMENTATION AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOR Empirical Evidence and Methodological Issues Jonas Gunnarsson Akademisk avhandling Som for aylaggande ay ekonomie doktorsexamen yid Handelshogskolan i Stockholm framlagges for offentlig granskning fredagen den 12 februari, 1999, kl. 13.15 i sal Torsten, HandelshOgsko1an, Syeavagen 65, Stockholm. PORTFOLIO-BASED SEGMENTATION AND CONSUMER BEHAVIOR Empirical Evidence and Methodological Issues ~ STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS 'V EFl, THE ECONOMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE EFlMission EFl, the Economic Research Institute at the Stockholm School ofEconomics, is a scientific institution which works independently ofeconomic, political and sectional interests. It con­ ducts theoretical and empirical research in management and economic sciences, including selected related disciplines. The Institute encourages and assists in the publication and distribution of its research findings and is also involved in the doctoral education at the Stockholm School ofEconomics. EFl selects its projects based on the need for theoretical or practical development of a research domain, on methodological interests, and on the generality ofa problem. Research Organization The research activities are organized in twenty Research Centers within eight Research Areas. Center Directors are professors at the Stockholm School ofEconomics. ORGANIZATIONAND MANAGEMENT Management and Organisation (A) Prof Sven-Erik Sjostrand Public Management (F) ProfNiIs Brunsson Information Management (I) ProfMats Lundeberg Man and Organisation (PMO)
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    7/1/2021 David A. Hirshleifer Affiliation: Marshall School of Business University of Southern California 3670 Trousdale Pkwy Los Angeles, CA 90089 and National Bureau of Economic Research (Corporate Finance and Asset Pricing Programs) Previous Positions: Merage Chair in Business Growth and Distinguished Professor of Finance and Economics The Paul Merage School of Business University of California, Irvine, 2006-21 Ralph Kurtz Chair in Finance Fisher College of Business The Ohio State University, 1999-2006 Merwin H. Waterman Professor of Finance Professor of Finance University of Michigan Business School, 1994-99 Associate Professor of Finance Assistant Professor of Finance Acting Assistant Professor of Finance Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA, 1984-94 Contact Information: (949) 724-2896; Assistant: Ginger Smith, [email protected] (949) 824-5122; FAX: (949) 824-8469 [email protected] Webpage and links to papers: Click here for an RSS feed that will notify you of my new papers and revisions. http://sites.uci.edu/dhirshle/ papers.ssrn.com/author=2024 ideas.repec.org/e/phi20.html http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=pblejMoAAAAJ&hl=en http://www.researcherid.com/rid/E-4342-2012 http://www.amazon.com/David-Hirshleifer/e/B002I5VMKC http://www.pricetheoryapplications.com/ https://twitter.com/4misceldah Degrees: BA 1980‚ Mathematics, UCLA MA 1983‚ Economics, University of Chicago PhD 1985‚ Economics, University of Chicago Articles: Moonshots, Investment Booms, and Selection Bias in the Transmission of Cultural Traits, David Hirshleifer and Joshua Plotkin, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, June 29, 2021, 118 (26) e2015571118. Social Finance as Cultural Evolution, Transmission Bias and Market Dynamics, Erol Akçay and David Hirshleifer, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences June 29, 2021, 118 (26) e2015568118.
    [Show full text]
  • Whither Securities Regulation? Some Behavioral Observations Regarding Proposals for Its Future
    PRENTICE.DOC 05/07/02 10:54 AM Duke Law Journal VOLUME 51 MARCH 2002 NUMBER 5 WHITHER SECURITIES REGULATION? SOME BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATIONS REGARDING PROPOSALS FOR ITS FUTURE ROBERT PRENTICE† ABSTRACT Respected commentators have floated several proposals for star- tling reforms of America’s seventy-year-old securities regulation scheme. Many involve substantial deregulation with a view toward allowing issuers and investors to contract privately for desired levels of disclosure and fraud protection. The behavioral literature explored in this Article cautions that in a deregulated securities world it is ex- ceedingly optimistic to expect issuers voluntarily to disclose optimal levels of information, securities intermediaries such as stock ex- changes and stockbrokers to appropriately consider the interests of investors, or investors to be able to bargain efficiently for fraud pro- tection. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...........................................................................................1399 I. Investor Regulation ...................................................................1402 II. Assumptions Underlying Investor Regulation.......................1408 A. Market Efficiency ...............................................................1409 Copyright © 2002 by Robert Prentice. † University Distinguished Teaching Professor and Ed & Molly Smith Centennial Profes- sor of Business Law, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin. PRENTICE.DOC 05/07/02 10:54 AM 1398 DUKE LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 51:1397 B. Optimal,
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Hersh Shefrin Mario L. Belotti Professor of Finance Department of Finance Leavey School of Business Santa Clara University Santa Clara, California 95053 Office: 408/554-6893 FAX: 408/554-5206 EMAIL: [email protected] Education B.Sc. (Hons.), University of Manitoba, 1970 M. Mathematics, University of Waterloo, 1971 Ph.D., London School of Economics, 1974 Ph.D. Honoris Causa, University of Oulu, Finland, 2006 Academic Positions Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Rochester, 1974-1979 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Santa Clara University, 1979-1986 Professor, Department of Economics, Santa Clara University, 1986-1990 Chair, Department of Economics, Santa Clara University, 1983-88 Professor, Department of Finance, Santa Clara University, 1990-present Publications The Global Financial Crisis And it Aftermath: Hidden Factors in the Meltdown, edited by A.G. Malliaris, L. Shaw, and H. Shefrin, New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming October 2016. “Assessing the Contribution of Hyman Minsky’s Perspective to Our Understanding of Economic Instability,” in The Global Financial Crisis And it Aftermath: Hidden Factors in the Meltdown, edited by A.G. Malliaris, L. Shaw, and H. Shefrin, New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming October 2016. “Behavioural Insights for Improving the Practice of Risk Management,” Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 9(2), 2016. “Behavioural Risk Management’s Focus on the Role of Conflicting Personalities,” Risk & Compliance, 2016. Behavioral Risk Management: Managing the Psychology that Drives Decisions and Influences Operational Risk, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2017 “The Behavioral Paradigm Shift,” RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(1). 2015. “Behavioral Economics and Business,” in The Purpose of Business: Contemporary Perspectives from Different Walks of Life, edited by David Gautschi and Al Erisman, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Pandemic Emotions: the Good, the Bad, and the Unconscious —Implications for Public Health, Financial Economics, Law, and Leadership
    Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy Volume 16 Issue 2 Spring Article 3 Spring 4-17-2021 Pandemic Emotions: The Good, The Bad, and The Unconscious —Implications for Public Health, Financial Economics, Law, and Leadership Peter H. Huang University of Colorado at Boulder, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Health Economics Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Other Medicine and Health Sciences Commons, and the Other Public Health Commons Recommended Citation Peter H. Huang, Pandemic Emotions: The Good, The Bad, and The Unconscious —Implications for Public Health, Financial Economics, Law, and Leadership, 16 NW. J. L. & SOC. POL'Y. 81 (2021). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol16/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy by an authorized editor of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2021 by Peter H. Huang Volume 16 (Spring 2021) Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy Pandemic Emotions: The Good, The Bad, and The Unconscious —Implications for Public Health, Financial Economics, Law, and Leadership Peter H. Huang* ABSTRACT Pandemics lead to emotions that can be good, bad, and unconscious. This Article offers an interdisciplinary analysis of how emotions during pandemics affect people’s responses to pandemics, public health, financial economics, law, and leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights Into Behavioral Finance
    New Insights into Behavioral Finance Nieuwe inzichten in financiële gedragseconomie ISBN 978 90 5170 920 9 Cover design: Crasborn Graphic Designers bno, Valkenburg a.d. Geul This book is no. 429 of the Tinbergen Institute Research Series, established through cooperation between Thela Thesis and the Tinbergen Institute. A list of books which already appeared in the series can be found in the back. New Insights into Behavioral Finance Nieuwe inzichten in financiële gedragseconomie Thesis to obtain the degree of Doctor from the Erasmus University Rotterdam by command of the rector magnificus Prof.dr. S.W.J. Lamberts and in accordance with the decision of the Doctorate Board The public defence shall be held on Thursday 4 December 2008 at 16.00 hrs by GUIDO BALTUSSEN born in Hengelo (Overijssel), the Netherlands Doctoral Committee Promotor: Prof.dr. J. Spronk Other members: Prof.dr. H. Bleichrodt Prof.dr. W.F.M. De Bondt Prof.dr. P.P. Wakker Acknowledgments The completion of my PhD required a tremendous amount of work, which I could not have done without help and support of others. Therefore, I would like to thank everyone who has helped and supported me. In particular the following persons come to my mind. First and foremost I would like to thank Thierry Post for guiding and supporting me all along the way and helping me push my research (skills) to a higher level in every way I can think off. Similarly, I thank Martijn van den Assem, especially for teaching me the importance of (all kinds of) details. The three of us have had lots of fun (often also together with our girlfriends), in particular during the “Deal or No Deal” project and the various conferences we have visited.
    [Show full text]