John Friend Making Biological Citizens Manuscript

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

MAKING BIOLOGICAL CITIZENS IN POSTCOLONIAL SOCIETIES: SCIENCE, GENDER, AND NATIONAL IDENTITY IN SOUTH KOREA AND THE PHILIPPINES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AUGUST 2014 By John M. Friend Dissertation Committee: Michael Shapiro, Chairperson Sankaran Krishna Debora Halbert Jungmin Seo Antonio Contreras Andrew Arno Keywords: Citizenship, Empire, Postcolonialism, Nationalism, Science, Gender © Copyright 2014 by John M. Friend ii ABSTRACT This dissertation offers a postcolonial theory of biological citizenship for understanding national identity and body politics in the Philippines and South Korea. Using a Foucauldian genealogical approach, I investigate how western science and technology shape, influence, and define biological citizenships within the structures and processes of imperialism and nation making. Such an investigation reveals that these biological identities are coeval with the colonial encounter and are, therefore, sensitive to the political and economic histories of the colonizer and colonized. Through a contrapuntal reading of postcolonial Philippines and Korea, I conclude that women and their bodies are intricately interlinked within the circulation, flux, and flow of colonialism and nation making, thus becoming biological citizens par excellence. As the internal and external pressures on the nation change, such as decolonization, nationalization, and globalization, so do the “kinds” of female bodies the nation needs. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... iii CHAPTER 1 ...................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 Revisiting the “Third Culture” ..................................................................................................... 2 The Need for a Contrapuntal Reading of Biological Citizenship ................................................ 6 “Woman” as Biological Citizen Par Excellence ........................................................................ 13 Toward a Postcolonial Theory of Biological Citizenship .......................................................... 17 Why Should We Read Georges Canguilhem Today? ................................................................ 25 Biological Subjectivity in the West Today ................................................................................ 28 The Formation of Biological Citizenships ................................................................................. 32 Theory and Method .................................................................................................................... 37 Chapter Outline .......................................................................................................................... 39 CHAPTER 2 .................................................................................................................... 45 Identity Politics within the Tensions of Empire ........................................................................ 45 Gender and Imperial Science ..................................................................................................... 53 The Native within the Psychoanalytic Gaze .............................................................................. 58 Freud’s Woman and Her Primitive Counterpart ........................................................................ 60 The Making of Criminal Woman ............................................................................................... 61 Becoming Woman, Becoming Biological Citizen ..................................................................... 70 Becoming Woman, Becoming Nation ....................................................................................... 74 CHAPTER 3 .................................................................................................................... 79 Identity and Nation Making in (Post)colonial Philippines ........................................................ 79 Moral Panic, Risk and Blame: Defining the “Other” ................................................................ 80 An Investigation into the Politics of Disease ............................................................................. 83 The Rise of the New Public Health and the Birth of Bacteriology ............................................ 85 The Individualization of Disease Control and Prevention ......................................................... 87 Western Imperialism and the New Public Health ...................................................................... 89 Colonial Medicine and Moral Hygiene in the Philippines ........................................................ 91 White Women as Expert and Domestication through Public Health ......................................... 93 Policing Promiscuous Defecation .............................................................................................. 99 Transforming the Filipino into a Biocitizen ............................................................................ 101 Resisting the New Public Health ............................................................................................. 104 CHAPTER 4 .................................................................................................................. 106 The Biopolitics of Disease in Postcolonial Philippines ........................................................... 106 The Making of the Postcolonial Filipina ................................................................................. 109 The Disciplinary Gaze of the (Post)colonial Juridico-Medical Complex ................................ 121 Counter-Hegemonic Spaces and Resistance to Biomedicalization ......................................... 124 CHAPTER 5 .................................................................................................................. 127 Toward a Genealogy of Biological Citizenship in Korea ........................................................ 127 Japanese “Truth Games” and Defining the Biological Other .................................................. 128 Nation Making and the Gender Question ................................................................................ 135 Bionationalism and Body Politics in (Post)colonial Korea ..................................................... 140 Becoming Woman in Postcolonial Korea ................................................................................ 145 “Korean Woman” as an Extension of Neoliberal Globalization ............................................. 149 iv CHAPTER 6 .................................................................................................................. 155 The Politics of Belonging in Postcolonial Korea ..................................................................... 155 The Birth of the Korean Welfare State .................................................................................... 158 Gendered Subjectivities and the Welfare State ........................................................................ 160 Postcolonial Technoscience and the Practices of Meaning-Making ....................................... 163 Those Last Men Who Invented Modernity for a Nation ......................................................... 166 Social Welfare as Clinical Inquiry into the Perils of Modernization ....................................... 169 The Threat of the “Gold Miss” ................................................................................................ 173 The Making of Pathological and Normal Femininities in Korea ............................................. 175 “I am a Missy, the Missy is Different” .................................................................................... 177 An Unfinished Yeopung .......................................................................................................... 178 CHAPTER 7 .................................................................................................................. 184 Who is Colonizing Who? Biopower in Colonial Modernity ................................................... 184 The Art of Performing Citizenship in Colonial Modernity ..................................................... 186 Oriental Orientalism or Colonialism Redux? .......................................................................... 192 Body Politics in Postcolonial Korea ........................................................................................ 194 Not Just Any-Body Can Be a Postcolonial Citizen ................................................................. 199 Resistance and the Future of the Biological Citizen ................................................................ 204 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................................................................................... 209 v CHAPTER 1 “Life is a Concept.” – Georges Canguilhem, Le Concept et la Vie, 1966. “Gradually, an administrative and political space was articulated upon a therapeutic space; it tended to individualize bodies, diseases, symptoms, lives and deaths; it constituted
Recommended publications
  • Legacies of the Holocaust in Health Care

    Legacies of the Holocaust in Health Care

    Legacies of the Holocaust in Health Care January 2021, Volume 23, Number 1: E1-81 From the Editor Why Does Medical Participation in the Holocaust Still Matter? 3 Tessa Chelouche, MD and Matthew K. Wynia, MD, MPH Case and Commentary How Should Clinicians’ Involvement in the Holocaust Inform Contemporary Responsibilities to Protect Public Safety? 6 Matthew K. Wynia, MD, MPH How Should History of Physician Involvement in the Holocaust Inform How Physicians Approach Employers? 12 Mark G. Kuczewski, PhD and Amy Blair, MD How Should a Physician Respond to Discovering Her Patient Has Been Forcibly Sterilized? 18 Rebecca Kluchin, PhD Medical Education Teaching Health Professions Students About the Holocaust 26 William S. Silvers, MD, Matthew K. Wynia, MD, MPH, Mark A. Levine, MD, and Meleah Himber, MEd How Should Students Learn About Contemporary Implications of Health Professionals’ Roles in the Holocaust? 31 Robert Baker, PhD Health Law Health Professionals, Human Rights Violations at the US-Mexico Border, and Holocaust Legacy 38 Susannah Sirkin, MEd, Kathryn Hampton, MSt, and Ranit Mishori, MD, MHS AMA Journal of Ethics, January 2021 1 AMA Code Says AMA Code of Medical Ethics’ Opinions Related to the Legacies of the Holocaust in Health Care 46 Scott J. Schweikart, JD, MBE and Danielle Hahn Chaet, MSB State of the Art and Science “Prevention” and Human Gene Editing Governance 49 Eric T. Juengst, PhD How Should We Regard Information Gathered in Nazi Experiments? 55 Arthur L. Caplan, PhD Medicine and Society Teaching Hard Truths About Medicine and the Holocaust 59 Tessa Chelouche, MD Cautions About Medicalized Dehumanization 64 Alexandra Minna Stern, PhD Art of Medicine What Art Museums Can Teach Today’s Clinicians About How to Orient Themselves to Their Professions’ Roles in the Holocaust 70 Martina Lentino Viewpoint A Call to Commemorate International Holocaust Remembrance Day, January 27, in All Health Science Schools 75 Matthew K.
  • 2 Biopolitics and Modernity: Revisiting the Eugenics Project

    2 Biopolitics and Modernity: Revisiting the Eugenics Project

    2 Biopolitics and Modernity: Revisiting the Eugenics Project For a long time, the notion of eugenics was firmly associated with the notions of racism and biological determinism; eugenics was taken to be a reactionary, pseudo-scientific ideology, typically emerging from an authoritarian, fascist or totalitarian state. Hence, eugenics was located on one side of a binary ma- trix, together with racism, biological determinism, pseudo-science, coercion, control and authoritarianism as opposed to tolerance, sound science, free- dom and democracy on the other. In this vein, Garland Allen, one of the first historians of eugenics in the 1970s, lamented that British eugenics became a reactionary programme for solving social problems through biological technology. A direct heir of the Social Darwinist philosophy of the late nineteenth century, twentieth century eugenics had a strongly racist bias which explained all differences between people in hereditarian terms. Eugenicists saw all racial and ethnic groups (what they persisted in calling ‘races’) in hierarchical terms, with the Anglo-Saxon on top and all other groups ranging below in a scale of decreasing whiteness. (Allen 1976, 111) With the emergence of the new genetics in the 1980s and 90s, the picture of eugenics as a repressive, reactionary and racist ideology often served as a background against which genetics compared quite favorably. While eugen- ics, in this picture, put the emphasis on race, the new genetics served the purpose of health; while eugenics was state-sponsored and operated through force, genetic testing was a matter of individual freedom and self-determi- nation. Eugenics was pseudo-science; genetics was sound science.
  • Shades of White

    Shades of White

    GERALDINE ONDRIZEK ARTIST PROJECT SPACE, JORDAN SCHNITZER MUSEUM OF ART, THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON SEPT 2 - DEC 14, 2014 14, DEC - 2 SEPT OREGON OF UNIVERSITY THE ART, OF MUSEUM SCHNITZER JORDAN SPACE, PROJECT ARTIST ONDRIZEK GERALDINE SHADES OF WHITE OF SHADES PHEOMELANIN MIXED MELANIN EUMELANIN yellow, reddish, and blue black to brown pigmentation pigmentation The color of hair, skin, and eyes in animals mainly depends on the quan- tity, quality, and distribution of the pigment melanin. Melanocytes are respon- sible for the synthesis of melanin within membrane-bound organelles (mela- nosomes) and the transport of melanosomes to surrounding epidermal cells (keratinocytes). Melanocytes in mammals and birds produce two chemically dis- tinct types of melanin pigments, the black to brown eumelanin and the yellow, reddish, and blue pheomelanin. Source: Shosuke Ito and Kazumasa Wakamatsu, Quantitative Analysis of Eumelanin and Pheomelanin in Humans, Mice, and Other Animals: A Comparative Review THE EXHIBITION IS SUPPORTED BY THE OREGON ARTS COMMISSION AND THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS, A HALLIE FORD FELLOWSHIP FROM THE FORD FAMILY FOUNDATION, AND THE STILLMAN DRAKE FUND AT REED COLLEGE SHADES OF WHITE GERALDINE ONDRIZEK, ARTIST PROJECT SPACE, JORDAN SCHNITZER MUSEUM OF ART, THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, SEPT 2 - DEC 14, 2014 GERALDINE ONDRIZEK: SHADES OF WHITE ARTIST’S STATEMENT In the 1927 case Buck v. Bell, the United States Supreme Court upheld the con- Shades of White, an installation created for the Artist Project Space at the Jordan stitutionality of involuntary sterilization. The plaintiff, Carrie Buck, an inmate at a Schnitzer Museum of Art, is the result of years of research.
  • Redalyc.Eugenics, Sterilization, and Historical Memory in the United States

    Redalyc.Eugenics, Sterilization, and Historical Memory in the United States

    História, Ciências, Saúde - Manguinhos ISSN: 0104-5970 [email protected] Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Brasil Minna Stern, Alexandra Eugenics, sterilization, and historical memory in the United States História, Ciências, Saúde - Manguinhos, vol. 23, núm. 1, diciembre, 2016, pp. 195-212 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=386149858011 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Eugenics, sterilization, and historical memory in the United States STERN, Alexandra Minna. Eugenics, sterilization, and historical memory in the United States. História, Ciências, Saúde – Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, v.23, supl., dez. 2016, p.195-212. Abstract Eugenics, sterilization, From the 1920s to the 1950s, California sterilized approximately 20,000 people and historical memory in in state homes and hospitals based on a eugenic law that authorized medical the United States superintendents to perform reproductive surgeries on patients deemed unfit and “suffering from a mental affliction likely to be inherited.” Working with a unique Eugenia, esterilização e resource – a dataset created from 19,000 sterilization recommendations – my memória histórica nos EUA team and I have reconstructed patterns and experiences of institutionalization of sterilizations. This article presents several of our important initial findings related to ethnic and gender bias in sterilization policies, and reflects on the relevance of the history for contemporary issues in genomics and social justice. Keyword: eugenics; sterilization; California; Mexicans; racism.
  • “Stains” on Their Self-Discipline: Public Health, Hygiene, and the Disciplining of Undocumented Immigrant Parents in the Nation’S Internal Borderlands

    “Stains” on Their Self-Discipline: Public Health, Hygiene, and the Disciplining of Undocumented Immigrant Parents in the Nation’S Internal Borderlands

    SARAH HORTON University of Colorado Denver JUDITH C. BARKER University of California, San Francisco “Stains” on their self-discipline: Public health, hygiene, and the disciplining of undocumented immigrant parents in the nation’s internal borderlands ABSTRACT ygiene, with its connotations of civilization and morality, has Histories of the role of public health in nation long served as a yardstick against which nonwhites’ “fitness” building have revealed the centrality of hygiene to for citizenship has been assessed. Judgments about a group’s eugenic mechanisms of racial exclusion in the capacity for self-governance are often based on assessments of turn-of-the-20th-century United States, yet little proper family governance, and, thus, negative portrayals of mi- scholarship has examined its role in the present day. Hnority women’s caregiving practices have long assumed a central place in Through ethnography in a Mexican migrant both nativist and colonial discourses. During the early 20th century, for ex- farmworking community in California’s Central ample, the high infant mortality rate of Mexican-origin children in south- Valley, we explore the role of oral hygiene ern California generated stereotypes of Mexican immigrant women as “bad campaigns in racializing Mexican immigrant parents mothers” (Molina 2006). These concerns, in turn, cast public health de- and shaping the substance of their citizenship. partments as Mexican immigrants’ legitimate “stewards,” portraying them Public health officials perceive migrant farmworkers’ as what Natalia Molina calls “stubborn children—a whole population who children’s oral disease as a “stain of backwardness,” needed to be overseen, trained, controlled” (2006:74). Meanwhile, in the amplifying Mexican immigrants’ status as “aliens.” colonial Philippines, public health officials’ portrayals of women’s unhy- We suggest, however, that the recent concern with gienic caregiving practices justified Filipinos’ continued status as wards of Mexican immigrant children’s oral health blends the state.
  • South Asians As Medical Scapegoats in British Columbia and the Pacific Coast States, 1900-1924

    South Asians As Medical Scapegoats in British Columbia and the Pacific Coast States, 1900-1924

    South Asians as Medical Scapegoats in British Columbia and the Pacific Coast States, 1900-1924 by Isabel Wallace A thesis submitted to the Department of History In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in History Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (September, 2013) Copyright © Isabel Wallace, 2013 Abstract This transnational study of the first-wave South Asian immigrant experience in British Columbia and the Pacific coast states shows how elected officials at all levels of government, bureaucrats, union leaders, physicians, members of the press, and the general public utilized purported public health concerns to justify South Asian exclusion and disenfranchisement. While all Asian groups living along the Pacific coast faced opposition to their immigration and settlement, India’s subordinate status within the British Empire, and a sustained western association of South Asians with disease, uniquely positioned North American discourse on South Asians at the intersection of colonial theory, Orientalism, and medicalized nativism in the first two decades of the twentieth century. ii Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank God for watching over me during this entire process. I would also like to thank my supervisors, Dr. Jeffrey Brison and Dr. Barrington Walker, for their valuable assistance during the thesis writing process, and Committee members Dr. Ishita Pande, Dr. Blaine Allan, Dr. Jane Errington, Dr. Margaret Little, and Dr. Patricia Roy. I would also like to thank Dr. Galen Roger Perras for kindly agreeing to read early drafts of the thesis, and for providing me with guidance with my archival research at Library and Archives Canada.
  • Thinking Gender Papers

    Thinking Gender Papers

    UCLA Thinking Gender Papers Title Criminal Reproduction: Early Eugenics and Gendered Imprisonment in California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/78f522b7 Author Jogoleff, Christina Publication Date 2012-04-18 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 4.0 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Christina Jogoleff - Ethnic Studies, UC Riverside Criminal Reproduction: Early Eugenics and Gendered Imprisonment in California California is known as a leader of the nation and the world, including but not limited to: education, public health, progressive policies, and so on. However, the notion of “Leadership” is what I hope to call into question. I am especially apprehensive about understanding this leadership as something to be proud of as a state, a nation, and a people. Histories of prisons, eugenical science and medicine, and homophobic policies are intimately stitched into the narrative of progressivism California is so popular for, yet this stitching is not always visible. California is not remembered as a leader of racist policies and genocidal practices, even when these continue today in different forms and pitched in a new language. I am primarily concerned with the evidence that California led the nation in performing more than 20,000 compulsory1 sterilizations from 1909-1979 – this is more than 1/3 of all documented sterilizations in the United States.2 The history, taught in primary education classes and displayed on California’s website for teachers, students, and researchers, does not tell the story of Nazi scientists following and working alongside California eugenicists or how prevalent eugenics was within dominant ideas of economics, politics, and social policy during the early twentieth century.
  • Constructing Eden: Eugenics in California from Soil to Science

    Constructing Eden: Eugenics in California from Soil to Science

    Constructing Eden: Eugenics in California from Soil to Science The small town of Ukiah, California was once home to the Mendocino State Hospital for the Insane. The hospital itself sat among lush forests painted against a backdrop of picturesque mountains, but within its walled gardens, 113 men and 51 women were sterilized without consent up to the year 1939.1 Though these figures are much lower in number than other institutions such as the Patton (1,693) and Stockton (1,455) State Hospitals, the Mendocino State Hospital is emblematic of the eugenic landscape of California between 1909 and 1979. Among forests and rolling hills you could be committed six times for fleeing home in a “nude condition” because your husband “drank and bought lottery tickets” with such frequency that you “would go without meat for days at a time.”2 You might not officially be diagnosed for twenty years despite being subjected to repeated intelligence and venereal disease exams. Eventually, because you had been classified as “unfit,” “asocial,” or “promiscuous,” you might even be sterilized without consent.3 It is no coincidence that such abuses could occur in such a beautiful landscape in light of how interwoven the development of California’s agricultural empire and eugenic culture were. The landscape of the Mendocino State Hospital for the Insane thus raises the central questions of this essay: What is eugenic science and how did it develop in the United States and California? Are there differences in those developmental pathways in human, economic, and environmental terms? How were these ideologies put into practice on human bodies? This project traces the intellectual underpinnings of the eugenic landscape of California and connects them to the 1 Sterilizations Performed in California State Hospitals for Mentally Diseased and Defective Persons, Up to January 1, 1938 (Board of Charities, Corrections, and Insanity, 1938), Box 17 F.
  • Century of Eugenics in America

    Century of Eugenics in America

    A C E N T U R Y of E U G E N I C S in A M E R I C A From the Indiana Experiment to the Human Genome Era Edited by PAUL A. LOMBARDO Indiana University Press Bloomington & Indianapolis 2011 Running Head · PB Contents · Preface & Acknowledgments ix · Introduction: Looking Back at Eugenics Paul A. Lombardo 1 · Part 1. The Indiana Origins of Eugenic Sterilization 1 The Hoosier Connection: Compulsory Sterilization as Moral Hygiene Elof Axel Carlson 11 2 The Indiana Way of Eugenics: Sterilization Laws, 1907–74 Jason S. Lantzer 26 · Part 2. Eugenics and Popular Culture 3 From Better Babies to the Bunglers: Eugenics on Tobacco Road Paul A. Lombardo 45 4 “Quality, Not Mere Quantity, Counts”: Black Eugenics and the NAACP Baby Contests Gregory Michael Dorr & Angela Logan 68 · Part 3. State Studies of Eugenic Sterilization 5 From Legislation to Lived Experience: Eugenic Sterilization in California and Indiana, 1907–79 Alexandra Minna Stern 95 PB · Running Head 6 Eugenics and Social Welfare in New Deal Minnesota Molly Ladd-Taylor 117 7 Reassessing Eugenic Sterilization: The Case of North Carolina Johanna Schoen 141 8 Protection or Control? Women’s Health, Sterilization Abuse, and Relf v. Weinberger Gregory Michael Dorr 161 · Part 4. Eugenics in the Human Genome Era 9 Are We Entering a “Perfect Storm” for a Resurgence of Eugenics? Science, Medicine, and Their Social Context Linda L. McCabe & Edward R. B. McCabe 193 10 Modern Eugenics and the Law Maxwell J. Mehlman 219 · List of Contributors 241 · Index 243 Preface & Acknowledgments In 1907, Indiana passed the first involuntary sterilization law in the world based on the theory of eugenics.
  • The 'Unfit': 'Race' Cleansing in the US

    The 'Unfit': 'Race' Cleansing in the US

    The ‘Unfit’: ‘Race’ Cleansing in the US HIS 345-01 Spring, 2009 Professor Cheryl Logan Office: MHRA, Rm 2116 Phone: 334-3999 E mail: [email protected] Office Hours: Mon 5-6, Wed., 3-4 pm, or by appt Eugenics was a branch of the life sciences that drove much of American social policy in the early twentieth century. Its goal was to promote morality and progress by cleansing the ‘superior races’ of contamination by ‘inferior types’, such as the poor, the mentally and physically disabled and tainted “races”, such as Blacks, Jews, and immigrants. Invented in England, pioneered in America and perfected in Nazi Germany, the movement drew on science to structure American society from the 1880s to the 1960s. This course examines the social and scientific trends that supported the movement to categorize people as more or less fit, and breed a better humanity based on eliminating the ‘unfit.’. In the process, we will explore how and why we categorize people and how context affects the ways in which science shapes American society in a system that is open to diversity, but often deeply threatened by it. EVALUATION AND GRADING: Your grade in the course will be based on exam scores, in-class and two assignments: 20% two written assignments 70% 3 exam grades 10% class participation, There will be 3 exams, including the final; the first will be 20% or your grade, the next two will count 25% each. The final exam will be cumulative and it will occur during the scheduled period for final exams. I will evaluate your work based on your: • written articulation of concepts, theories and historical trends gleaned from the readings • effective explanations of the ethical issues and contemporary problems raised by biological concepts as they influence cultural diversity • integration and synthesis of historical trends on exams, assignments and discussions REQUIRED TEXTS/READINGS: Texts: Wendy Kline.
  • Mentalism, Xenophobia, and Racism

    Mentalism, Xenophobia, and Racism

    The Evolution of American Eugenics in the Twentieth Century: Mentalism, Xenophobia, and Racism. A Thesis submitted to the Graduate School Valdosta State University in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History in the Department of History of the College of Humanities & Social Sciences July 2021 Joseph Matthew Dillon Bell BA, Valdosta State University, 2018 © Copyright Joseph M. Bell All Rights Reserved This Thesis, “The Evolution of American Eugenics in the Twentieth Century: Mentalism, Xenophobia, and Racism,” by Joseph Matthew Dillon Bell, is approved by: Thesis Committee Chair Thomas Aiello, Ph.D. Associate Professor of History & African American Studies Committee Members Mary Block, Ph.D. Professor of History Dixie Haggard, Ph.D. Professor of History & Native American Studies Associate Provost for Graduate Studies and Research Becky K. da Cruz, Ph.D., J.D. Professor of Criminal Justice FAIR USE This Thesis is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, revised in 1976). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of the material for financial gain without the author’s expressed written permission is not allowed. DUPLICATION I authorize the Head of Interlibrary Loan or the Head of Archives at the Odum Library at Valdosta State University to arrange for duplication of this Thesis for educational or scholarly purposes when so requested by a library user. The duplication shall be at the user’s expense. Signature ____________________________________________________ I refuse permission for this Thesis to be duplicated in whole or in part.
  • Self-Health: the Politics of Care in American Literature, 1793-1873 by Emily Joan Waples a Dissertation Submitted in Partial

    Self-Health: the Politics of Care in American Literature, 1793-1873 by Emily Joan Waples a Dissertation Submitted in Partial

    Self-Health: The Politics of Care in American Literature, 1793-1873 by Emily Joan Waples A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (English Language and Literature) in The University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor Susan Scott Parrish, Chair Associate Professor Daniel S. Hack Professor Kerry C. Larson Professor Alexandra M. Stern © Emily Joan Waples, 2016 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee for seeing me through this process, especially my chair, Scotti Parrish, whose deep and careful analyses have helped shape my thinking, whose example as a scholar and teacher has encouraged me, and whose kindness has sustained me. Kerry Larson energized my interests in the nineteenth century, and I’m indebted to his keen readings and expert diagnostics. Alex Stern brought her invaluable expertise and intellectual rigor to bear upon this project. My thanks to Gregg Crane for lending his eye to this dissertation’s earlier stages, and to Danny Hack for lots of things, not least of which is agreeing to read this. Research for this dissertation was generally supported by fellowships from Rackham Graduate School and the Institute for the Humanities. I’m deeply and happily beholden to the intellectual community at the University of Michigan for including me and energizing me these past six years. Sid Smith has been an invaluable mentor from the very beginning. June Howard helped me to formulate my interests; Scott Lyons offered reassurance during a time of some despair. I thank the 2015-2016 Institute fellows for their generous engagement with my work; the members of my cohort, especially Adam Sneed, a dear friend since day one, for their companionship; and the faculty and students in the Medical Humanities Path of Excellence at the University of Michigan Medical School for welcoming me among them.