I Ssion and Fuel Consumption

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

I Ssion and Fuel Consumption ; , PB 290953 REPORT NO. DOT-TSC-NHTSA-78-47 HS-803-722 AN ASSESSMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF COMBUSTION RESEARCH ON INTERNAL COMBU STiON ENG I NE EM I SSION AND FUEL CONSUMPTION J.L. Kerrebrock C. E. Ko 1 b AERODYNE RESEARCH, INC. Bedford Research Park, Crosby Drive Bedford MA 01730 . '. ~~ •. JANUARY 1979 FINAL REPORT DO{;UMEN1 IS AVA I LABLe TO -I HE PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL 1ECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGlt~IA 22161 Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Office of Research and Development Washington DC 20590 REPRODUCED BY NATIONAL TECHNICAL INfORMATION SERVICE u. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SPRINGFIELD, VA. 22161 · . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern­ ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro­ ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con­ sidered essential to the object of this report. Technical k.port Documentation Pog!!! --.-- 1. R$p.nrt No. 2. Government Ace •• ,ion No. 3. R.~!p'i.n~. ~~Ial~O 9 53 ruj,t' !\)1,., 2 ' HS-803-722 " t'].n, '7 4. Titl" and Subtitl" 5. R.porl Dol. January 1979 AN ASSESSMENT OF THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF COMBUSTION 6. Performing Organi zClltion Code RESEARCH ON INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE EMISSIONS AND FUEL CONSUMPTION 8. P.rforming Organization Report No. 7. Aulhor'.) ARI-RR-13l J.L. Kerrebrock & C.E. Kolb DOT-TSC-NHTSA-78-47 9. Performing Drg""i,"Iio" Nome and Address 10. Work Unil No. (TRAIS) HS-92 7 /R9404 Aerodyne Research, Inc. * Contract or Grant No. Bedford Research Park, Crosby Drive ".DOT-TSC-1487 Bedford MA 01730 13. Type of R"porl and Period Coy,,,,,d 12. Sponsoring A~eney Harne and Addrus Final Report U.S. Department of Transportation Dec 1977 to April 1978 I National Highway Traffic Safety Administr~tion Office of Research and Development 14. Sponsoring Agency Cod" Washington DC 20590 - 15. SUl'pl~m~"I"ry Not~. U.S. Department of Transportation Research 7<Under Contract to: and Special Programs Administration Transportation Systems Center Kendall Square, Cambridge MA 02142 '", 16. A"",'<lcl A revievl of the present level of understanding of the basic thermodynamic, fluid dymanic, and chemical kinetic processes which affect the fuel economy and levels of pollutant exhaust products of Diesel, Stratified Charge, and Spark Ignition engines is presented. Key areas are identified where insufficient understanding • currently prevents the rational development of internal combustion engines with improved performance. A research plan designed to gather the needed data ~s presented. 17. Key Word. 18. Dlstrlhution Stetemant Automotive emissions, Automotive fuel economy, spark ignition engine emissions, DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL Stratified charge engine emissions, Com- INFORMATION SERVICE. SPRINGFIELD. bustion efficiency, Fluid mechanics and VIRGINIA 22161 Chemical kinetics of Internal Combustion engines. -- 19. Security CI" •• I f. (of Ihlo report) 20. Security Claui f. (of thl. paga) ,,,. 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified I}IlS-1} dJj .. Form DOT f 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorlud '- • .. ~. PREFACE The purpose of this report is to reVlew the present levels of understand­ ing of the basic theromodynamic, fluid dynamic, and chemical kinetic processes which affect the fuel economy and exhaust pollutant levels in Diesel, Statified charge, and Spark Ignition engines for Light Duty Vehicles. Key areas where the levels of understanding are currently insufficient to allow the rational development of improved internal combustion engines are identified, and a research plan designed to gather the needed data is presented. -' iii Preceding page blank METRIC CONVERSION FACTORS Approximl" Conversions to Mltric MlisurIS -- ~ Allprlli .." Conversions fro .. Mltric Milluril --;: Sy.~., WIoII Yo. Ito.. M.lti~ly ~y T. Fio4 ' ....' S,.... WHO , .. 1Ia.. MIIItifJy h r. FiN S,.... _ ----N LEIST" ~ ~ "LENGTH -- millimeters O.Ge inches !! em centUMters 0.' inches - meters 3.3 f8M f1 I"~ 2.5 c .... tuneters em - aD I'ftetef'S 1.1 yards yet ft tMt 30 centimeters em - am kiklmet.s 0.6 miles "" yd ,8Ids 0.9 meters =-'"--___ mites 1.6 kilometers kftI ::: - MU AREA :!l .,..,e cent .....s 0.16 square inches ,.2 2 -----=- - r::tril ill wqu.,we inch.s &.5 squ.. centure... m2 ...... met.. '.2 square yards 2 ~ ~ .,.r tt ........ feet 0.09 SQUare meters ",2 _ ..2 .,..... IlIlQlNters 0.4 square mile. ,.2 ~ squ... yR. 0.' ~ meters ~ 2 - : he hectwes 110,000 m2J 2.S acres ....,. mil ~ miles 2.6 square kllaneters II.tn _ <: KnS 0.. hectAres M _ ~---~ -- MASS I_i,ltt/ MASS I_i,ltl/ N - grans 0.036 ounces OZ oz ounces 28 grF'IS 9 - _ kg kilogr8ft'tS 2.2 pounds 10 Ib pcu'lds 0.45 luk9"ams kg - tonnes(1000kg) 1,1 short tons short tons 0.9 tonnes - ~_=-___ ~~ a VOLUME =-- - VOLUME milliliters ml - .. , " .. 111 liter. 0.03 fI.uid ounces fI CIII ·sta ..spoons - I lila's 2 , Pints pi rt.p teblespoons 15 "u II ,hlef'll ",I • n CIt floz fluid ounces 30 nulhlitefs ml -- I~ters 1.06 qua • I cups 0.24 Itters I 11., 0..25 gall.ona ~ pi piAts 0." liters - _ m~ cubtc meters 35 cu::~ '::'. ~] qt qwaf'ts 0.95 liters _'" cutNc meters 1.3 cu y ~I ~".ons 3.8 literS I 3 _ _ " cul"c 0.03 cub,e ~ =---- TEMPERATURE IUlct) ~ cubiC f...yards 0." cubiC me....lN1er$ ",3 _ _ TEMPERATURE (ilict/ 'c C.I.... 9/5 1_ F._it 'F _ __ _321 ,_- OF F...... lt 5/' ',lifter eels'us ~C _ ~ aubtrec:tMg ten9lfatwe ., ];2) - OF 32 9&1 212 -40 140 10 ~ 120 '10 ZOO I -. - I 'I"," , f 'I' ','.' " ' I ' " ',' ',' 1 ~ - -40 - 20 0 20 ..a 60 '0 !'f : _ _!.c 37 II ~ I .. • (. CONTENTS Section 1 INTRODUCTION ••.•.•..••.•.•••••••••••.•.••••••• 1 2 FACTORS WHICH CONTROL FUEL CONSUMPTION •.••.••••• 4 2.1 Compression Ratio ••.•••••••••••••••.••••••••. 5 2.2 Heat Addition Schedule . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • . • • • 6 2.3 Load Variation •.•••••••••.•••.•••••.•••••••.• 7 2.4 Working Fluid Composition. • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • 8 2.5 Sizing and Piston Speed .••.••••••••••.•.•.••••.• 9 2.6 Power Transmission Characteristics •.•••••••.•.•••• 10 3 FACTORS WHICH CONTROL EMISSIONS ...••••.••...••.•• 12 3.1 Background on Regulated Emissions ...•..••••.•••.•• 12 3.2 Backtround on Unregulated Emissions •••••••••.••••.• 16 -. 3.2.1 Unburned Hydrocarbons - Special Classes .•.••••• 17 3.2.2 Nonhydrocarbon Unregulated Emissions •.•••••••• 21 3.3 NOx Production Chemistry ••••••••••..••.••••..•• 26 3.3.1 Modified Zeldovich Mechanism .••••.•••..•••. 26 3.3.2 "Prompt" NO ••.•..••••••••.•••..••.•.• 29 3.3.3 Fuel N Derived NO •••••.•..•••••••••••••• 29 3.4 NOx Emission Control Strategies •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 30 3.4.1 Adjustment of Fuel/Air Equivalence Ratio. • • • • • • • 30 3.4.2 Exhaust Gas Recirculation and Compression Ratio. •• 31 3.4.3 Adjustment of Other Engine Parameters ••••••••• 31 3.4.4 Staged Combustion • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • 31 3.5 Chemistry of Emissions Due to Incomplete Combustion •.•• 32 3.5.1 Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Combustion Systems . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . •• 32 3.5.2 CO Oxidation Chemistry • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • 32 v CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Section Page 3.5.3 Wall and Boundary Layer Quench Effects .•..••••• 33 3.5.4 Diesel Combustion Model ....•••....••••••.• 33 3.5.5 Role of Fluid Mixing Processes in Hydrocarbon Emissions ............................ 36 3.6 Incomplete Combustion Control Strategies •.••••.••..•. 36 3.7 Role of Lubricating Oil in Emissions Problems •.••••••• 36 3.8 Role of Nonhydrocarbon Impurities and Additives in Emission Chemistry •.•.•...•••..•.•.•.••...•••• 37 3.9 Emissions Measurements Techniques ...•••...•.••.•• 37 3.9.1 Measurement of Light-Weight Gaseous Pollutants •.• 37 3.9.2 Measurement of High Molecular Weight and Particulate Pollutants •.•••••.•.••.•.•••.•• 38 4 COMPETITION OF HOMOGENEOUS VERSUS STRATIFIED CHARGE ENGINES .....•..••••.•••.••.•...••.•..•• 40 5 TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER FROM GAS TURBINE COMBUSTIONS .- TO HETEROGENEOUS COMBUSTION PISTON ENGINES .•••••• 42 6 RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES 45 6.1 Fluid Mechanics of Piston Engines • • . • • . • . • . • . • • • 46 6.2 Chemical Reaction Mechanisms and Kinetics .••..••.•.• 53 6. 3 Liquid Fuel Injection Dynamics and Spray Combustion • • • • • 58 6. 3.1 Fuel Pressuriz ation and Metering .•••.•••••••• 58 6.3.2 Spray Formation ••.•..•••••••••..••.••••• 59 6.3.3 Spray Combustion ••••.•••••..••••..•••••• 60 6.4 Fuel Characteristics and Modifications •.••...••.••••. 63 6. 5 Cycle Modific ation • • . • • • • • • . • . • . • . • • • . • . 65 6 • 5 .1 Supercharging........................... 65 6.5.2 Valve Control .......................... 0 67 6.6 Heat Loss Reduction •.••••.•.•••••••••••••.••••• 68 If vi CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Section 7 SUMMARY. 70 APPENDIX A REFERENCES.................................................. 76 APPENDIX B REPORT OF INVENTIONS....................................... 83 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1-1 Average Passenger Car Fuel Economy Standards........... .... ..... 2 3-1 Federal Light-Duty Vehicle Exhaust Emission Standards.. ..... .... 12 3-2 Evaluated Rate Constants for Modified Zeldovich Reactions... .... 28 .. 6-1 Estimates of the Relative Importance of Major Research Areas.... 47 7-1 Summary of Recommended Research Programs.... .... ... ...... ... .... 73 vii/viii 1. INTRODUCTION The conservation
Recommended publications
  • Development of a Throttleless Natural Gas Engine
    February 2002 • NREL/SR-540-31141 Development of a Throttleless Natural Gas Engine Final Report John T. Kubesh Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, Texas National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute ••• Battelle ••• Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 February 2002 • NREL/SR-540-31141 Development of a Throttleless Natural Gas Engine Final Report John T. Kubesh Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, Texas NREL Technical Monitor: Mike Frailey Prepared under Subcontract No. ZCI-9-29065-01 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute ••• Battelle ••• Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION National
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Parts 531 and 533 [Docket No. NHTSA-2008-0069] Passenger Car Average Fuel Economy Standards--Model Years 2008-2020 and Light Truck Average Fuel Economy Standards--Model Years 2008-2020; Request for Product Plan Information AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Request for Comments SUMMARY: The purpose of this request for comments is to acquire new and updated information regarding vehicle manufacturers’ future product plans to assist the agency in analyzing the proposed passenger car and light truck corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards as required by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended by the Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007, P.L. 110-140. This proposal is discussed in a companion notice published today. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [insert date 60 days after publication in the Federal Register]. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by Docket No. NHTSA-2008- 0069] by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. 1 • Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12- 140, Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, between 9 am and 5 pm ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Telephone: 1-800-647-5527. • Fax: 202-493-2251 Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and docket number for this proposed collection of information.
    [Show full text]
  • How a Fuel Injection System Works | How a Car Works 10/5/20, 1128 AM How a Fuel Injection System Works
    How a fuel injection system works | How a Car Works 10/5/20, 1128 AM How a fuel injection system works For the engine to run smoothly and efficiently it needs to be provided with the right quantity of fuel /air mixture according to its wide range of demands. A fuel injection system Petrol-engined cars use indirect fuel injection. A fuel pump sends the petrol to the engine bay, and it is then injected into the inlet manifold by an injector. There is either a separate injector for each cylinder or one or two injectors into the inlet manifold. Traditionally, the fuel/air mixture is controlled by the carburettor , an instrument that is by no means perfect. Its major disadvantage is that a single carburettor supplying a four- cylinder https://www.howacarworks.com/basics/how-a-fuel-injection-system-works Page 1 of 7 How a fuel injection system works | How a Car Works 10/5/20, 1128 AM engine cannot give each cylinder precisely the same fuel/air mixture because some of the cylinders are further away from the carburettor than others. One solution is to fit twin-carburettors, but these are difficult to tune correctly. Instead, many cars are now being fitted with fuel-injected engines where the fuel is delivered in precise bursts. Engines so equipped are usually more efficient and more powerful than carburetted ones, and they can also be more economical, as well as having less poisonous emissions . Diesel fuel injection The fuel injection system in petrolengined cars is always indirect, petrol being injected into the inlet manifold or inlet port rather than directly into the combustion chambers .
    [Show full text]
  • And Outboard 2 and 4-Stroke Engines. There Are Plenty of Reasons to Choose Marina Lubricants
    From eni's research department comes the eni i-Sea line of lubricants, designed for all types of pleasure craft, from yachts to dinghies right through to personal watercraft equipped with inboard and outboard 2 and 4-stroke engines. There are plenty of reasons to choose marina lubricants HIGH BIODEGRADABILITY CLEAN ENGINES The special synthetic esters used offer a high The special “ashless” formulation, designed to degree of biodegradability (67% on the OECD reduce the formation of carbon deposits in the 301F test), allowing you to significantly reduce motor, ensures optimal operation and better impact on aquatic life. performance. ENGINE LONGEVITY ANTI-SALINE CORROSION The good cleansing and dispersing properties The special additives developed protect against keep all engine parts in perfect working order, wear and saline corrosion, which are typical of which helps to give it greater longevity. the marine environment, ensuring that the internal components of the engine are fully protected. PROLONGED INTERVALS BETWEEN CHANGES Synthetic bases and antioxidant additives ensure a prolonged interval between changes. RADA outboard G B I E L D I FUEL OECD T Y O I ECONOMY B 301f Lubricants developed specifically for 2 and 4-stroke outboard engines, tested to meet the most demanding CERTIFICATE NMMA international technical FC-W reference standards. (CAT) performance synthetic technology performance CERTIFICATE catalyst compatible NMMA API SM API SL TC-W3 High biolube biodegradability outboard 10W-30 outboard 10W-40 Synthetic biodegradable lubricant - suitable for Synthetic lubricant – suitable for Lubricant for 4-stroke 2-stroke outboard direct injection engines or a catalysed 4-stroke outboard engines.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent 19 L L 3,948,227 Guenther 45) Apr
    United States Patent 19 l l 3,948,227 Guenther 45) Apr. 6, 1976 54 STRATIFED CHARGE ENGINE 57 ABSTRACT 76 Inventor: William D. Guenther, R.R. 2, An apparatus for applying a stratified charge to a re Hagerstown, Ind. 47346 ciprocating internal combustion engine is disclosed. 22 Filed: Mar. 8, 1974 The apparatus comprises a cylindrical rotary valve body disposed for rotation within the head of an inter 21 ) Appl. No.: 449,241 nal combustion engine. The valve body defines dia metrically extending inlet and exhaust passages which, 52 U.S. C. ....... 123/32 SP; 123175 B; 123/190 A; during rotation of the valve body, place a cylinder of 123/190 B; 123/190 BD; 123/80 BA the engine in sequential communication with an inlet 5 i Int. Cl........................ F02B 19/10; FO1 L7/00 manifold and an exhaust manifold secured to the 58) Field of Search........... 123/32 ST, 32 SP, 75 B, head. The inlet manifold comprises a double-passage 123/80 BA, 33 VC, 190 R, 190 B, 190 BB, gallery for transporting a lean fuel/air charge in a first 190 BD, 190 D, 190 C, 127 passage and a rich fuel/air charge in a second passage. Rotation of the inlet passage into communication with (56) References Cited the cylinder also brings the inlet passage into sequen UNITED STATES PATENTS tial communication with the first throat and then the 194,047 8/1877 Otto.................................. 123,175 B second throat for transporting the first lean charge 1,594,664 8/1926 Congellier......................... 123,175 B and then the second rich charge to the cylinder.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects and Advantages of Gasoline Direct Injection System Vishwanath M*, S
    Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical SciencesISSN: 0974-2115 Effects and Advantages of Gasoline Direct Injection System Vishwanath M*, S. Madhu Department of Automobile Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Chennai-602 105 *Corresponding author: E-Mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Gasoline direct injection process is a form of gas give procedure used in current developments of vehicle. The gasoline financial system and the stringent exhaust emission norms has led to the transmission in the gasoline process from carburetor direct injection method. Probably the most predominant international initiative of the automobile industry is to improve an immediate-injection fuel engine. Four technical aspects that make up the groundwork applied sciences in direct injection methods. a) Air waft into the cylinder is improved. b) The form of the piston with curved high controls the combustion by way of mixing the air-gasoline combination. c) The stress of gas injection is accelerated by the excessive strain gas Pump. d) The vaporization and dispersion of the gas spray is managed by means of the excessive stress swirl injector Gasoline financial system will also be acquired by using adjusting air fuel ratio situated on the performing load. It presents a right estimation of the nice of gasoline required at right time and supplies manipulate over combustion. Gasoline in this paper advantages and effects of fuel direct injection procedure is reviewed. KEY WORDS: Gasoline direct injection (GDI), High Pressure Fuel Pump, Carburetor. 1. INTRODUCTION The fundamental goals of the automotive enterprise is to acquire a excessive energy, low precise fuel consumption, low emissions, low noise and higher drive relief cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Charge Stratification for an Internal Combustion Engine
    CHARGE STRATIFICATION FOR AN INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Engineering (Mechanical) in the University of Canterbury by CHRISTIAN CHANDRAKUMAR ZAVIER Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Canterbury 1991 To My Mother CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT (i) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS (iii) LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS (iv) UST OF TABLES (vi) LIST OF PLATES (vii) LIST OF FIGURES (viii) CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Fuel economy 1 1.3 Exhaust emissions 2 1.4 Lean burn engines 10 1.5 Introduction to the present work 17 CHAPTER 2 : LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Introduction 23 2.2 Basic principle of charge stratification 23 2.3 Stratified charge engines 24 2.4 Development of stratified charge engines 24 2.5 Flame propagation in a stratified charge mixture 32 2.6 Effect of air motion on a stratified charge engine performance 35 2.7 Pollutant formation in stratified charge engines 37 2.8 Fuel economy results with stratified charge engines 41 2.9 Exhaust emission results of stratified charge engines 42 CHAPTER 3: EXPERIMENTAL APPARATUS 3.1 Apparatus for the engine combustion experiments 44 3.2 Apparatus for the combustion chamber simulation 50 CHAPTER 4 : EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE 4.1 Combustion experiments 61 4.2 Combustion chamber simulation 68 CHAPTER 5: DATA ANALYSIS 5.1 Nomenclature 79 5.2 Combustion experiments 81 5.3 Combustion chamber simulation 86 CHAPTER 6: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 6.1 General 87 6.2 Experimental results 88 6.3 Performance optimisation study 89 6.4 Engine
    [Show full text]
  • (10) Patent No.: US 6386175 B2
    USOO6386175B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,386,175 B2 Yang (45) Date of Patent: *May 14, 2002 (54) FUEL INJECTION 4,574,754 A 3/1986 Rhoades, Jr. ............... 123/298 4,685,432 A 8/1987 Saito et al. ................. 123/276 (75) Inventor: Jialin Yang, Canton, MI (US) 4,753,213 A 6/1988 Schlunke et al. ........... 123/533 4,770,138 A 9/1988 Onishi ........................ 123/276 (73) Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, Inc., 4,788,942 A 12/1988 Pouring et al. ..... ... 123/26 Dearborn, MI (US) 4,852,525 A 8/1989 Ishida ........................ 123/276 5,054,444 A 10/1991 Morikawa ................... 123/295 (*) Notice: This patent issued on a continued pros- 5,078,107 A 1/1992 Morikawa ................... 123/295 ecution application filed under 37 CFR 5,086,737 A 2/1992 Watanabe et al. ........... 123/295 1.53(d), and is subject to the twenty year E. A yE. t et al. ........... 2. atent term provisions of 35 U.S.C. 24 a u-a- - - a u-1 - - - YY Wr - us - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E)). p 5,322,043 A 6/1994 Shriner et al. .............. 123/306 5,329,901 A 7/1994 Onishi ........................ 123/254 Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this .. A ly SOG- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :2. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 so. A 60. Sita.O9l el al. O.. 123/295 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 5,553,588 A 9/1996 Gono et al. ................. 123/276 5,605,125 A 2/1997 Yaoita ........................ 123/275 (21) Appl.
    [Show full text]
  • Honda Motor Company's Cvcc Engine
    . HE 1 8.5 .A3 4 )RT NOS. DOT-TSC-NHTSA-80-3 no HS-805268 DOT- TSC- NHTSA- 8(1-3 HONDA MOTOR COMPANY'S CVCC ENGINE 0 / William J. Abernathy Larry Ronan LEXINGTON TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES 10 Wingate Road Lexington MA 02173 JL'LY 1980 FINAL REPORT DOCUMENT IS available TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION S E I I I R V C E . SP R NG F E L D, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION Office of Resear CP and Development Washington DC 20590 . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof NOTICE ' The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers' names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. — Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. HS-805268 4. Ti tie ond Subti tie 5. Report Date July 1980 HONDA MOTOR COMPANY'S CVCC ENGINE 6. Performing Orgonizafion Code 8. Performing Orgonization Report No. 7. Author'' s) DOT-TSC-NHTSA-80-3 william J. Abernathy and Larry Ronan 9. Performing Organization Nome and Address 10. J(fc»,rk UmfJdo. (TPAISl HS028/R0404 Lexington Technology Associates* 11. Contract or Grant No. 10 Wingate Road DOT-TSC-1355 Lexington MA 02173 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Nome and Address U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermodynamic Analysis of Indirect Injection Diesel
    THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF INDIRECT INJECTION DIESEL ENGINE OPERATION by Mostafa M. Kamel B.Sc., M.Sc., D.I.C. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Engineering of the University if London • 1977 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London SW7 2BX To my MOTHER ABSTRACT An investigation is presented which analyses, both theoretically and experimentally, the operation of the Indirect Injection Diesel Engine. A computer program was developed to mathematically simulate the thermodynamic processes involved in the operation of the indirect injection diesel engine. The quasi-steady filling and emptying approach was employed to describe gas flow and changes in thermodynamic conditions. Numerical techniques were used to integrate the governing equations describing the engine thermodynamics along equal crank angle increments over the full engine cycle. In the simulation program a correlation was developed for heat flux calculations. This was based on a Nu-.Re relationship, in which velocity estimates representative of the chamber charge are obtained via the kinetic energy conservation concept. The correlation provided good predictions of heat fluxes in the cylinder and the prechamber when compared with measured behaviour. The discharge coefficient of the connecting passage was found to be dependent on its shape. It was also found to be a function of the flow direction and pressure ratio. The effect of piston proximity was also investigated and accounted for. Ignition delay periods were measured and correlated to chamber condi- tions. Both physical and chemical parts of the delay were considered. An extensive experimental programme has been carried out to obtain steady state data for the engine under test.
    [Show full text]
  • Combustion Process in the Spark-Ignition Engine with Dual-Injection System
    Chapter 2 Combustion Process in the Spark-Ignition Engine with Dual-Injection System Bronisław Sendyka and Marcin Noga Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/54160 1. Introduction In these times injection is the basic solution of supplying of fuel in the Spark-Ignition (SI) engines. The systems of fuel injection were characterized by different place of supplying of fuel into the engine. Regardless of the sophistication of control system, the following types of fuel injection systems can be identified: • injection upstream of the throttle, common for all of the cylinders – called Throttle Body Injection – TBI or Single Point Injection – SPI (Figure 1 a), • injection into the individual intake channels of each cylinder – called Port Fuel Injection – PFI or Multipoint Injection – MPI (Figure 1 b), • injection directly into the each cylinder, Direct Injection – DI (Figure 1 c). 1.1. Historical background of application of fuel injection systems in SI engines The history of application of fuel injection for spark-ignition engines as an alternative for unreliable carburettor dates back to the turn of the 19th and 20th century. The first attempt of application of the fuel injection system for the spark-ignition engine took place in the year 1898, when the Deutz company used a slider-type injection pump into its stationary engine fuelled by kerosene. Also fuel supply system of the first Wright brothers airplane from 1903 one can recognize as simple, gravity feed, petrol injection system [2]. Implementation of a Venturi nozzle into the carburettor in the following years and various technological and material problems reduced the development of fuel injection systems in spark-ignition engines for two next decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Thermodynamic Analysis for Further Improvements of Direct Injection Diesel Engines
    Journal of KONES Internal Combustion Engines 2003, vol. 10, No 1-2 NEW CONCEPTS TO AVOID UNWANTED POLLUTANTS FROM D.I. DIESEL ENGINES IN PASSENGER CARS H. Heitland, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ingenieurbüro HEITECH @ t-online.de G. Rinne, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Institut für Fahrzeugbau, Wolfsburg Abstract The self ignition process in Diesel engines with direct injection takes place simultaneously with the disintegration of the injected fuel together with the evaporation of the sprays and the droplets. With shorter ignition delays it is possible to improve the combustion process and reach higher efficiencies of the engine. Also a partly homogeneous combustion could be established in order to reach less formation of soot and NOx. One way to create this favourable combustion process is to work with a ring piston, which allows to achieve two different compression ratios: a higher one in the ring area for self ignition of the Diesel spray and a lower one for the homogenous combustion in the central main chamber. Another way is a double injection into the main chamber, one for ignition, the other for combustion of the major fuel, which must be injected at the beginning of the compression phase. The first concept uses the common rail injector, the last one the VW unit injector. Both concepts need no particle filter or oxi-cat for the fulfilment of emission regulations. 1. The two different combustion processes [ 1, 2 ] The ideal Process is defined: • Air-charge without residual gases • Air-fuel ratio as in the real engine • Complete combustion • Combustion at Top Dead Center • No Heat Losses CALCULATION: 1 Using the 3 laws of thermodynamics 2 using the real values of matter 3 using the maximum work instead of heat values RESULTS: 1.The Diesel engine is better than the Otto engine.
    [Show full text]