1A Upper Labial Furrows Very Long, Extending Infront of Eyes. Prominent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1A Upper Labial Furrows Very Long, Extending Infront of Eyes. Prominent KEY GUIDE TO CARCHARHINIDAE 1a Upper labial furrows very long, extending infront of eyes. Prominent lateral keels. Galeocerdo cuvier, p.25 1b Upper labial furrows do not extend infront of eyes. Lateral keels usually absent. 2 Labial furrows long– Labial furrows short– Prominent lateral keels– Lateral keels absent, or low– Galeocerdo cuvier, p.25 Go to 2 Galeocerdo cuvier, p.25 Go to 2 2a First dorsal fi n much closer to pelvic fi ns than pectoral fi ns. Low lateral keels. Briliant blue above. P. glauca, p.27 2b First dorsal fi n equidistant or closer to pectoral fi ns. No lateral keels. 3, Carcharhinus species lateral keels low no lateral keels First dorsal fi n closer to pelvic fi ns– First dorsal fi n equidistant or closer to pectoral fi ns– Prionace glauca, p.27 Go to 3 3a First dorsal and pectoral fi ns very broad with rounded white mottled tips C. longimanus, p.39 CARCHARHINIDAE TO GUIDE KEY 3b Fins not mottled white; fi rst dorsal and pectoral fi ns tapering with pointed tips 4, p.22 rounded tip, no mottling mottled white rounded tip, mottled white Pectoral fi ns broad– Pectoral fi ns SHARK First dorsal fi n very broad– First dorsal fi n tapering– Carcharhinus tapering– Carcharhinus longimanus, p.37 Go to 4, p.22 longimanus, p.37 Go to 4, p.22 21 FAO Pelagic Guide to the Indian Ocean pp017-032 wide.indd 21 19/08/2014 17:31 KEY GUIDE TO CARCHARHINIDAE 4a First dorsal fi n, pectoral, pelvic and caudal fi ns with conspicuous white tips and posterior edges C. albimarginatus, p.29 4b First dorsal fi n, pectoral, pelvic and caudal fi ns without white tips 5 sometimes Conspicuous white tips and posterior edges– No white tips to most fi ns– Carcharhinus albimarginatus, p.31 Go to 5 5a Caudal fi n with prominent posterior black edges with no black tip on fi rst dorsal fi n C. amblyrhynchos, p.33 5b Caudal fi n with prominent posterior black edges or plain, but if edge is black and fi rst dorsal fi n tip is black 6 KEY GUIDE TO CARCHARHINIDAE TO GUIDE KEY no black tip if black tip caudal fi n posterior edges black Caudal fi n with prominent posterior black edges– Caudal fi n with or without prominent posterior black Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, p.29 edges– Go to 6 6a First dorsal origin well behind pectoral free rear tips C. falciformis, p.35 6b First dorsal origin infront of or over pectoral free rear tip 7, p.23 SHARK First dorsal fi n origin well behind pectoral free rear tip– First dorsal fi n origin in front or over pectoral free rear tip– Carcharhinus falciformis, p.35 Go to 7, p.23 22 FAO Pelagic Guide to the Indian Ocean pp017-032 wide.indd 22 19/08/2014 17:31 KEY GUIDE TO CARCHARHINIDAE 7a First dorsal origin in front of or over pectoral insertions, or at least nearer pectoral free rear tips 8 7b First dorsal origin opposite or just in front of pectoral rear tips but closer to them than pectoral insertions 9 First dorsal fi n origin in front to near pectoral insertions– First dorsal fi n origin closer to pectoral rear tips– Go to 8 Go to 9 8a Anterior nasal fl aps low and inconspicuous. 14 rows of teeth. First dorsal very high. Interdorsal ridge low C. plumbeus, p.43 8b Anterior nasal fl aps high and triangular. 15 rows of teeth. First dorsal lower. Interdorsal high C. altimus, p.31 interdorsal ridge low interdorsal ridge high Anterior nasal fl aps low– Anterior nasal fl aps high– First dorsal in very high– First dorsal in high– C. plumbeus, p.43 C. altimus, p.31 C. plumbeus, p.43 C. altimus, p.31 9a Upper teeth relatively high & narrow. Pectoral fi ns roughly straight. First dorsal fi n high with straightish anterior margin C. galapagensis, p.37 CARCHARHINIDAE TO GUIDE KEY 9b Upper teeth relatively low & broad. Pectoral fi ns curved. First dorsal fi n low with curved anterior margin C. obscurus, p.41 straightish anterior margin C. galapagensis, p.37 C. galapagensis, p.37 C. obscurus, p.41 curved anterior margin C. obscurus, p.41 SHARK C. galapagensis, p.37 C. obscurus, p.41 23 FAO Pelagic Guide to the Indian Ocean pp017-032 wide.indd 23 19/08/2014 17:31 KEY GUIDE TO CARCHARHINIDAE Carcharhinidae species comparison Carcharhinus falciformis p.35 Galeocerdo cuvier p.25 KEY GUIDE TO CARCHARHINIDAE TO GUIDE KEY Prionace glauca p.27 Carcharhinus longimanus p.37 Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos p.29 Carcharhinus galapagensis p.39 Carcharhinus albimarginatus p.31 Carcharhinus obscurus p.41 Carcharhinus altimus p.33 Carcharhinus plumbeus p.43 24 FAO Pelagic Guide to the Indian Ocean pp017-032 wide.indd 24 19/08/2014 17:32 CARCHARHINIFORMES Carcharhinidae: Requiem sharks TIG Galeocerdo cuvier Tiger Shark (Péron & Lesueur, 1822) Requin Tigre Commun NT LL ● Big-head, very short, blunt-snouted, large-mouth, with a rather slender body behind the pectoral fi ns. ● Interdorsal ridge present ● Large spiracles. and very prominent. ● Slender caudal fi n with Galeocerdo cuvier an acutely pointed tip. ● Anal fi n about same size as second dorsal fi n. ● Low keels on caudal peduncle. ● Very long upper labial furrows that reach the eyes. ● Distinctive dark, vertical tiger-stripe markings, faded or obsolete in large adults. Upper labial furrows very long Upper labial furrows Dentition Description Colour A stout bodied, big-headed, short, blunt-snouted, large- Grey with a unique colour pattern of mouthed shark with a rather slender body behind the black spots and vertical bars on dorsal pectoral fi ns; large slit-like spiracles; labial furrow very long; surface of body, bold in young but interdorsal ridge present and very prominent; fi rst dorsal fading out in adults. origin above pectoral insertions or inner margins; anal fi n Size 5 Gills about as large as second dorsal. Males mature: 225–290cm. Females mature: 250–350cm. Maximum size: 550cm to possibly 700cm. Anal n Anal Birth size: 50–75cm. n Anal Teeth approximately actual size. Teeth cockscomb-shaped curved teeth with heavy SHARK serrations and distal cusplets. Tooth counts: upper jaw 18–26, lower jaw 18–25. © NOAA Fisheries, USA 25 FAO Pelagic Guide to the Indian Ocean pp017-032 wide.indd 25 19/08/2014 17:32 TIG Galeocerdo cuvier Tiger Shark SIMILAR SPECIES Short blunt snout with broadly rounded mouth; fi rst dorsal fi n above pectoral faded in large adults ; large cockscomb-shaped curved teeth with prominent fi ns inner margin; colour pattern of vertical bars and black spots, bold in young, serrations. Gill slits, fi rst dorsal position & caudal fi n shape Ventral view of head Second dorsal & anal fi ns distinctive vertical striping in specimens less than 3m short, blunt, wide snout interdorsal ridge very prominent slender caudal fi n with an acutely pointed tip low keels on caudal peduncle very long, prominent upper labial furrows fi rst dorsal fi n origin over inner margin of pectoral fi ns gill slits of medium anal fi n deeply notched, length, two in front teeth not obvious unless about same size as second of pectoral fi ns origin Galeocerdo cuvier Tiger shark mouth opened dorsal fi n, not minute boundary between dorsal colour and ventral white abrupt shortish, conically-blunt snout no interdorsal ridge caudal fi n crescent-shaped second dorsal fi n minute and ahead of anal fi n keel on caudal peduncle fi rst dorsal fi n about over gill slits long and all inner margin of pectoral fi ns upper labial in front of pectoral furrows minute fi ns origin anal fi n minute only slightly Carcharodon carcharias White Shark teeth obvious larger than second dorsal fi n distinctive ‘checkerboard’ patterning no interdorsal ridge caudal fi n semi-lunate very short, blunt, large keel on caudal peduncle very wide snout teeth minute never obvious gill slits long, four fi rst dorsal fi n set well back, partly over pelvic fi ns above pectoral fi ns anal fi n notched about same size Rhincodon typus Whale Shark as second dorsal fi n, not minute 26 FAO Pelagic Guide to the Indian Ocean pp017-032 wide.indd 26 19/08/2014 17:32 CARCHARHINIFORMES Carcharhinidae: Requiem sharks BSH Prionace glauca Blue Shark (Linnaeus, 1758) Peau Bleue LLLLNT ● Comparatively ● First dorsal fi n closer to ● Brilliant to dark blue dorsally. ● Caudal fi n with large eyes. pelvic fi ns origin than long lower lobe. pectoral fi ns free rear tip. ● No interdorsal ridge. Prionace glauca Prionace ● Long and narrow pectoral fi ns, pointed at tips. ● Low keel on caudal peduncle. ● Abruptly white ventrally. pectoral ns pectoral First dorsal n closer to pevic n than pevic n closer to dorsal First Dentition Description Colour Body slender; eyes very large; pectoral fi ns very long, Coloration is a brilliant to dark blue narrow, and pointed at tips; fi rst dorsal fi n closer to pelvic dorsally, becoming lighter bright blue fi ns origin; low keel on caudal peduncle; narrow-lobed laterally and abruptly white ventrally. caudal fi n with a long lower lobe. Size Males mature: 182–281cm. Females mature: about 200cm. Maximum size: about 380cm. Anal n Anal 5 Gills Teeth approximately actual size. SHARK Tooth counts: upper jaw 24–31, lower jaw 24–34. © Charlene Da Silva (Department Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries, South Africa) 27 FAO Pelagic Guide to the Indian Ocean pp017-032 wide.indd 27 19/08/2014 17:32 BSH Prionace glauca Blue Shark SIMILAR SPECIES The bright blue coloration and very long, narrowly tapering pectoral fi ns separates this shark from all other species in the region.
Recommended publications
  • Bignose Shark, Carcharhinus Altimus
    Published Date: 1 March 2019 Bignose Shark, Carcharhinus altimus Report Card Sustainable assessment IUCN Red List IUCN Red List Australian Least Concern Global Data Deficient Assessment Assessment Pillans, R.D., Amorim, A.F., Mancini, P.L., Gonzalez, M., Anderson, C.V. Assessors & Morgan, D.L. Report Card Remarks Not commercially harvested in Australia Summary The Bignose Shark is a large bodied shark with a likely circumglobal distribution. It inhabits continental shelf edges throughout tropical and temperate marine waters. It is not targeted by fisheries, however it is Source: CSIRO National Fish Collection. Licence: CC By Attribution taken as bycatch in longline, trawl and gillnet fisheries in much of its distribution. It is mistaken for the Sandbar Shark (C. plumbeus) and therefore, little information on population trends have been recorded. Declines in abundance have been reported in the Northwest Atlantic, Maldives and Southeast Asia, causing concern for the status of this species in these regions. In Australia, the Bignose Shark is not commercially targeted and rarely caught. Therefore, globally the Bignose Shark is Data Deficient (IUCN) and within Australia is assessed as Least Concern (IUCN) and Sustainable (SAFS). Distribution The Bignose Shark is circumglobally distributed throughout tropical and temperate waters however, records are discontinuous (Compagno 1984, Anderson and Stevens 1996, Last and Stevens, 2009). It has been recorded throughout the Central Atlantic Ocean (United States, Cuba, Brazil), Mediterranean Sea, the Indian Ocean (South Africa, India, Red Sea, Sri Lanka) and Northwest Pacific Ocean (China, Thailand, Mexico, California, Peru) (Compagno 1984, Anderson and Stevens 1996, Last and Stevens, 2009). Within Australia it is found in from Cape Leeuwin (Western Australia) north and east to northern New South Wales (Last and Stevens 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Demographic Analysis of the Dusky Shark, Carcharhinus Obscurus, in the Northwest Atlantic
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2004 Status and Demographic Analysis of the Dusky Shark, Carcharhinus obscurus, in the Northwest Atlantic Jason G. Romine College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Biostatistics Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, and the Oceanography Commons Recommended Citation Romine, Jason G., "Status and Demographic Analysis of the Dusky Shark, Carcharhinus obscurus, in the Northwest Atlantic" (2004). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539617821. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25773/v5-zm7f-h314 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Status and demographic analysis of the Dusky shark, Carcharhinus obscurus, in the Northwest Atlantic A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Jason G. Romine 2004 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of Master of Science Jason G. KOmine Approved, August 2004 NloW A. Musick, Ph.D. Committee Chairman/Advisor Kim N. Holland, Ph.D Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology University of Hawaii Kaneohe, Hawaii onn E. Olney, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Classification of Elasmobranchs
    An introduction to the classification of elasmobranchs 17 Rekha J. Nair and P.U Zacharia Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi-682 018 Introduction eyed, stomachless, deep-sea creatures that possess an upper jaw which is fused to its cranium (unlike in sharks). The term Elasmobranchs or chondrichthyans refers to the The great majority of the commercially important species of group of marine organisms with a skeleton made of cartilage. chondrichthyans are elasmobranchs. The latter are named They include sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras. These for their plated gills which communicate to the exterior by organisms are characterised by and differ from their sister 5–7 openings. In total, there are about 869+ extant species group of bony fishes in the characteristics like cartilaginous of elasmobranchs, with about 400+ of those being sharks skeleton, absence of swim bladders and presence of five and the rest skates and rays. Taxonomy is also perhaps to seven pairs of naked gill slits that are not covered by an infamously known for its constant, yet essential, revisions operculum. The chondrichthyans which are placed in Class of the relationships and identity of different organisms. Elasmobranchii are grouped into two main subdivisions Classification of elasmobranchs certainly does not evade this Holocephalii (Chimaeras or ratfishes and elephant fishes) process, and species are sometimes lumped in with other with three families and approximately 37 species inhabiting species, or renamed, or assigned to different families and deep cool waters; and the Elasmobranchii, which is a large, other taxonomic groupings. It is certain, however, that such diverse group (sharks, skates and rays) with representatives revisions will clarify our view of the taxonomy and phylogeny in all types of environments, from fresh waters to the bottom (evolutionary relationships) of elasmobranchs, leading to a of marine trenches and from polar regions to warm tropical better understanding of how these creatures evolved.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Petition to List the Oceanic Whitetip Shark
    A Petition to List the Oceanic Whitetip Shark (Carcharhinus longimanus) as an Endangered, or Alternatively as a Threatened, Species Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act and for the Concurrent Designation of Critical Habitat Oceanic whitetip shark (used with permission from Andy Murch/Elasmodiver.com). Submitted to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce acting through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Marine Fisheries Service September 21, 2015 By: Defenders of Wildlife1 535 16th Street, Suite 310 Denver, CO 80202 Phone: (720) 943-0471 (720) 942-0457 [email protected] [email protected] 1 Defenders of Wildlife would like to thank Courtney McVean, a law student at the University of Denver, Sturm college of Law, for her substantial research and work preparing this Petition. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 II. GOVERNING PROVISIONS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ............................................. 5 A. Species and Distinct Population Segments ....................................................................... 5 B. Significant Portion of the Species’ Range ......................................................................... 6 C. Listing Factors ....................................................................................................................... 7 D. 90-Day and 12-Month Findings ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Silky Shark Updated: December 2016
    Silky shark Updated: December 2016 SILKY SHARK SUPPORTING INFORMATION (Information collated from reports of the Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch and other sources as cited) CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT MEASURES Silky shark in the Indian Ocean are currently subject to a number of Conservation and Management Measures adopted by the Commission: • Resolution 15/01 on the recording of catch and effort data by fishing vessels in the IOTC area of competence sets out the minimum logbook requirements for purse seine, longline, gillnet, pole and line, handline and trolling fishing vessels over 24 metres length overall and those under 24 metres if they fish outside the EEZs of their flag States within the IOTC area of competence. As per this Resolution, catch of sharks silky sharks must be recorded by longline and purse seine fleets (retained and discarded). • Resolution 15/02 Mandatory statistical reporting requirements for IOTC Contracting Parties and Cooperating Non-Contracting Parties (CPCs) indicated that the provisions, applicable to tuna and tuna-like species, are applicable to shark species. • Resolution 11/04 on a Regional Observer Scheme requires data on shark interactions to be recorded by observers and reported to the IOTC within 150 days. The Regional Observer Scheme (ROS) started on 1st July 2010. • Resolution 05/05 Concerning the conservation of sharks caught in association with fisheries managed by IOTC includes minimum reporting requirements for sharks, calls for full utilisation of sharks and includes a ratio of fin-to-body weight for shark fins retained onboard a vessel. Extracts from Resolutions 15/01,15/02, 11/04 and 05/05 RESOLUTION 15/01 ON THE RECORDING OF CATCH AND EFFORT DATA BY FISHING VESSELS IN THE IOTC AREA OF COMPETENCE Para.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Requiem Sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic
    Field guide to requiem sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic Item Type monograph Authors Grace, Mark Publisher NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service Download date 24/09/2021 04:22:14 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/20307 NOAA Technical Report NMFS 153 U.S. Department A Scientific Paper of the FISHERY BULLETIN of Commerce August 2001 (revised November 2001) Field Guide to Requiem Sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic Mark Grace NOAA Technical Report NMFS 153 A Scientific Paper of the Fishery Bulletin Field Guide to Requiem Sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic Mark Grace August 2001 (revised November 2001) U.S. Department of Commerce Seattle, Washington Suggested reference Grace, Mark A. 2001. Field guide to requiem sharks (Elasmobranchiomorphi: Carcharhinidae) of the Western North Atlantic. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 153, 32 p. Online dissemination This report is posted online in PDF format at http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov (click on Technical Reports link). Note on revision This report was revised and reprinted in November 2001 to correct several errors. Previous copies of the report, dated August 2001, should be destroyed as this revision replaces the earlier version. Purchasing additional copies Additional copies of this report are available for purchase in paper copy or microfiche from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161; 1-800-553-NTIS; http://www.ntis.gov. Copyright law Although the contents of the Technical Reports have not been copyrighted and may be reprinted entirely, reference to source is appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Life History Variability of the Grey Reef Shark (Carcharhinus Amblyrhynchos) Across Its Range Darcy Bradley University of California, Santa Barbara
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons Center for Coastal Oceans Research Faculty Institute of Water and Enviornment Publications 2-16-2017 Growth and life history variability of the grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) across its range Darcy Bradley University of California, Santa Barbara Eric Conklin The Nature Conservancy Yannis P. Papastamatiou Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, [email protected] Douglas J. McCauley University of California, Santa Barbara Kydd Pollock The Nature Conservancy See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/merc_fac Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Bradley D, Conklin E, Papastamatiou YP, McCauley DJ, Pollock K, Kendall BE, et al. (2017) Growth and life history variability of the grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) across its range. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0172370. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0172370 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute of Water and Enviornment at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Coastal Oceans Research Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Darcy Bradley, Eric Conklin, Yannis P. Papastamatiou, Douglas J. McCauley, Kydd Pollock, Bruce E. Kendell, Steven D. Gaines, and Jennifer E. Caselle This article is available at FIU Digital Commons: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/merc_fac/2 RESEARCH ARTICLE Growth and life history variability of the grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) across its range Darcy Bradley1*, Eric Conklin2, Yannis P. Papastamatiou3, Douglas J. McCauley4,5, Kydd Pollock2, Bruce E.
    [Show full text]
  • (Elasmobranchii: Carcharhiniformes) in the Pliocene of the Mediterranean Sea
    N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 295/2 (2020), 129–139 Article E Stuttgart, February 2020 The extinct catshark Pachyscyllium distans (PROBST, 1879) (Elasmobranchii: Carcharhiniformes) in the Pliocene of the Mediterranean Sea Alberto Collareta, Marco Merella, Frederik H. Mollen, Simone Casati, and Andrea Di Cencio With 4 figures and 1 table Abstract: Sharks assigned to the carcharhiniform family Scyliorhinidae account for about 160 extant species placed in 18 genera. Most living scyliorhinids are small- to medium-sized ground sharks provided with cat- like eyes and nasal barbels similar to whiskers; hence their vernacular name, “cat- sharks”. Living catsharks mostly inhabit deep or rather deep waters of the warm and temperate seas worldwide, foraging on small fishes and inverterbates. In the present paper, we report on a lateral tooth of Scyliorhinidae collected from a clay pit at Certaldo (central Italy), where marine mudstones belonging to the famously fossiliferous Pliocene successions of Tuscany are exposed. This catshark specimen represents the second bona fide record of the extinct premontreine species Pachyscyllium distans in the Pliocene of the Mediterranean Sea, as well as the geologically youngest confirmed occurrence of this species worldwide. In the Mediterranean Pliocene, P. distans thus coexisted with the similar but distinct species Pachyscyllium dachiardii. After having been widespread in Northern Atlantic, Paratethyan, and Mediterranean waters in Miocene times, P. distans became confined to the Mediterranean Sea during the Pliocene. Therefore, similar to what has recently been suggested for P. dachiardii, we hypothesise that the range of P. distans contracted southward as colder conditions took hold in the Northern Hemisphere. The eventual extinction of P.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement Patterns and Habitat Use of the Silver Tip Shark (Carcharhinus Albimarginatus) at the Revillagigedo Archipelago
    Movement patterns and habitat use of the silver tip shark (Carcharhinus albimarginatus) at the Revillagigedo Archipelago Gádor Muntaner López Curso 2015/2016 Dra. Mª Milagrosa Gómez Cabrera Dr. Edgar Mauricio Hoyos Padilla Trabajo de Fin de Título para la obtención del título de graduado en Ciencias del Mar Trabajo de Fin de Título Grado en Ciencias del Mar Facultad de Ciencias del Mar Movement patterns and habitat use of the silver tip shark (Carcharhinus albimarginatus) at the Revillagigedo Archipelago Trabajo presentado por Gádor Muntaner López para la obtención del título de graduado en Ciencias del Mar en la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, dirigido por la Dra. Mª Milagrosa Gómez Cabrera y el Dr. Edgar Mauricio Hoyos Padilla del grupo de investigación Ecofisiología de los Organismos Marinos (EOMAR) y de Pelagios Kakunjá A.C., respectivamente. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria En Las Palmas a 11 de julio de 2016 El alumno Fdo.: Gádor Muntaner López Los directores Fdo.: María M. Gómez Cabrera Fdo: Edgar Mauricio Hoyos Padilla 2 Índex ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 5 MATERIAL AND METHODS.............................................................................................................. 8 Study area .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • White-Tip Reef Shark (Triaenodon Obesus) Michelle S
    White-tip Reef Shark (Triaenodon obesus) Michelle S. Tishler Common Name There are several common names for the Triaenodon obesus, which usually describes the “white tips” on their dorsal and caudal fins. Common names include: White-tip Reef Shark, Blunthead Shark, Light-Tip Shark and Reef Whitetip. Names in Spanish Cazón, Cazón Coralero Trompacorta and Tintorera Punta Aleta Blanca. Taxonomy Domain Eukarya Kingdom Anamalia Phylum Chordata Class Chondrichthyes Order Carcharhiniformes Family Carcharhinidae Genus Triaenodon Species obesus Nearest relatives Sharks are cartilaginous fishes in the class Chondrichthyes with skates, rays and other sharks. Within the family Carcharhinidae (requiem sharks), the White-tip Reef Shark is related to the Galapagos Shark, Bull Shark, Oceanic Whitetip, Tiger Shark and Blue Sharks. The White-tip Reef Shark does not share their genus name with any other organism. Island They are found amongst the reefs surrounding most or all of the Galapagos Islands. Geographic range White-tip Sharks range geographically from Costa Rica, Ecuador, Galapagos, Cocos, South Africa, Red Sea, Pakistan and etc. to primarily residing in the Indo-West Pacific region. (Red region indicates distribution of White-tip Reef Shark) Habitat Description As described in their name, White-tip Reef Sharks live amongst coral reefs with a home range of a couple square miles. They are also found in sandy patches and deeper waters. During the day these sharks tend to rest on the seabed or within caves and crevices. Physical description White-tip Reef sharks are named after the white tip on the dorsal (first and sometimes second) fins, and caudal fin lobes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharks and Rays
    SHARKS AND RAYS Photo by: © Jim Abernethy Transboundary Species - Content ... 31 32 33 34 35 ... Overview As stated in the previous section, the establishment of the Yarari fishing for sharks in the Netherlands and places new pressure on Marine Mammal and Shark Sanctuary was an important step fishermen to implement new techniques and updated fishing gear in protecting the shark and ray species of the Dutch Caribbean. to avoid accidentally catching sharks and rays as bycatch. Overall, there is a significant lack of information concerning these vital species within Dutch Caribbean waters. Fortunately, this There are several different international treaties and legisla- trend is changing and in the last few years there has been a push tion which offer protection to these species. This includes the to increase research, filling in the historic knowledge gap. Sharks Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), and rays are difficult species to protect as they tend to have long the Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW) protocol and reproduction cycles, varying between 3 and 30 years, small litters, the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). Scientists are just which means they do not recover quickly when overfished and can beginning to uncover the complexities of managing conservation travel over great distances which makes them difficult to track. efforts for these species, as they often have long migration routes which put them in danger if international waters are not managed Early in 2019, the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and protected equally. (LNV) published a strategy document to manage and protect sharks and rays within waters the Netherlands influences (this There are more than thirty different species of sharks and includes the North Sea, Dutch Caribbean and other international rays which are known to inhabit the waters around the Dutch waters).
    [Show full text]
  • SHARK Shooter Experience Mike Ball Dive Expeditions
    SHARK Shooter Experience Mike Ball Dive Expeditions Presentation compiled by: ABOUT – Mike Ball Dive Expeditions Co-Founding member of Global Shark Diving … ABOUT Mike Ball Dive Expeditions • 1969, Mike Ball commenced business. • 1987, commenced shark diving at Hungry Jacks in the Coral Sea. • 2002, Mike Ball, 1st liveaboard operator inducted into the International Scuba Diving Hall of Fame. • 2014, Co-Founding Member of Global Shark Diving. SHARK Diving Awareness GLOBAL SHARK DIVING Our global alliance of shark diving operators ensures: • Your safety is our primary concern. • We are dedicated to Shark Conservation. • We support & facilitate Shark Research. SHARK Shooter Experience ABOUTS - Sharks • Osprey sharks are one of the worlds thriving shark populations due to the interest of dive vessels. • Grey reef shark have 26-28 rows of teeth, white tip have 80-100 total rows. • A single lost tooth is replaced naturally in one day. • Sharks filter oxygen through gills (some can do it when stationary). • They can detect vibrations & electrical Question: How many fins do sharks have? signals i.e. camera strobes. 5: Dorsal & Caudal Pectoral, Pelvic & Anal. SHARK Diving Awareness SHARK SPECIES - Commonly Seen White Tip Reef Shark Grey Reef Shark Silver Tip Shark • Adults up to 1.6m- 5f/4inches. • Adults up to 1.8m- 6f/4inches. • Resemble a larger, bulkier • Slim, tube shape. • V shape from side or above. grey reef shark. • White tip on dorsal & upper • May have a white tip on dorsal. • White tip & border on all fins. caudal fin. SHARK Shooter Experience SHARK SPECIES - Occasionally Seen Wobbegong Shark Thresher Shark (Infrequent Sightings) Scalloped Epaulette Shark Hammer Head Shark (April – Sept) Leopard Shark Tiger Shark (Very Rarely Sighted) SHARK Diving Awareness 3 SHARK DIVES – From Spoilsport SHARK ATTRACTION SHARK FEED PRIVATE SHARK SHOOT • Approx.
    [Show full text]