DOCSLIB.ORG

Sakai 6-6-19 Schematic Design for Board Presentation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sakai 6-6-19 Schematic Design for Board Presentation SCHEMATIC DESIGN BAINBRIDGE ISLAND SAKAI PARK DRAFT JUNE 2019 ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS Bainbridge Island, WA SAKAI PARK HIGHWAY 305 R.O.W. 305 HIGHWAY sakai pond SAKAI HOUSE FUTURE TBD CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND MADISON AVENUE N ST. CECILIA CATHOLIC VIRGINIA VILLA CHURCH AND SCHOOL SENIOR APARTMENTS COLUMBIA BANK THE MARSHALL CHEVRON STATION HIGHWAY 305 HIGH SCHOOL ROAD NE 0 30 60 120 O VERALL S ITE P LAN 1” = 60’-0” June 06, 2019 DRAFT Page 5 S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS Bainbridge Island, WA 0 20 40 80 S ITE P LAN 1” = 40’-0” June 06, 2019 DRAFT Page 6 S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS Bainbridge Island, WA S TORM D RAINAGE AN D U TILITY P LAN June 06, 2019 DRAFT Page 8 S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS BainbridgeSakai Island, Park WA METAL ROOF, TYP. O/ SIP (STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS) O/ OPEN WEB METAL TRUSS METAL AND WOOD TRELLIS SUNSHADES LARGE METAL WINDOWS, TYP. OVERLOOK CAT WALK; WOOD DECKING W/ METAL HANDRAILS, TYP. FEASIBILITY STUDY DATE: April 16 2019 PIN PILE CONCRETE FOOTING STRUCTURE, TYP. @ CANTELIVERS REVISIONS: METAL SIDING, TYP. SLIDING BARN DOORS W/ GLAZING EXPOSED WOOD STRUCTURE @ OPEN ENTRY WAYS, TYP. RESTROOM BUILDING W/ LIVING ROOF, SEE A700 0 10 20 40 MULTIPURPOSE ROOM SITE PLAN BUILDING AXONOMETRIC 1 SCALE:1:20 1” = 20’-0” 2 SCALE:NTS SITE PLAN AND AXONOMETRIC SCALE: 1"=20' FEET 0 5' 10' 20' 40' 60' DRAWN BY: RFK CHECKED BY: JPJ JOB NO.: 30130.107 SHEET NO.: A020 All drawings and material appearing herein are the original and unpublished work of the architect and M U LT I - PURPO S E B UIL D ING may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without the written consent of Jones & Jones. JuneJ:\Bainbridge Sakai Park 30130\02-CAD\B-Arch\B0_Sheetset\A200 Multipurpose.dwg_4/22/2019 12:32 PM 06, 2019 DRAFT Page 13 S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS BainbridgeSakai Island, Park WA SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNSET NORTH 1 A210 WEST RESTROOM BUILDING W/ LIVING ROOF, SEE A700 OVERLOOK DECK (ALIGNED W/ SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE) LINE OF ROOF ABOVE FEASIBILITY STUDY SLIDING BARN DOORS W/ GLAZING 3 ENTRY A210 FRZ. CATERING KITCHEN W/ TEACHING TABLE AND CHAIR SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE STORAGE AREA REF. 170 SF 442 SF TABLE DOLLY WINTER SOLSTICE SUNSET HOT BOX PASS THROUGH 2 HOT MULTIPURPOSE ROOM BOX TEACHING TABLES A210 DATE: (MOVEABLE) 2,554 SF April 16 2019 CHAIR DOLLY CHAIR DOLLY CHAIR DOLLY HOT BOX ELECTRICAL REVISIONS: 4 40 SF A210 MECHANICAL WC 150 SF 60 SF SECONDARY EXIT MAINTENANCE ONLY CATWALK EAST WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE MULTIPURPOSE ROOM SOUTH SITE PLAN, AXON. AND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN 3695 SF FEET 1 SCALE:1/8"=1'-0" 0 2' 4' 8' 16' 24' DRAWN BY: RFK CHECKED BY: JPJ JOB NO.: 30130.107 General Notes: Additional storage spaceSHEET NO.:will be A200 0 4 8 16 incorporated into nextAll drawingsphase and ofmaterial design. appearing herein are the original and unpublished work of the architect and M U LT I - PURPO S E B UIL D ING may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without 1/8” = 1’-0” the written consent of Jones & Jones. JuneJ:\Bainbridge Sakai Park 30130\02-CAD\B-Arch\B0_Sheetset\A200 Multipurpose.dwg_4/22/2019 12:32 PM 06, 2019 DRAFT Page 14 S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS BainbridgeSakai Island, Park WA FEASIBILITY STUDY METAL ROOF, TYP. O/ SIP (STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS) O/ OPEN WEB METAL TRUSS METAL AND WOOD TRELLIS SUNSHADES LARGE METAL WINDOWS, TYP. DATE: April 16 2019 REVISIONS: METAL SIDING TYP. PIN PILE CONCRETE FOOTING STRUCTURE, TYP. @ CANTELIVERS LIVING ROOF W/ EXPOSED WOOD STRUCTURE @ OPEN ENTRY WAYS TYP., STORAGE, AND RESTROOM WOOD DECKING W/ METAL HANDRAILS, TYP. 0 10 20 40 ANALOG BUILDING SITE PLAN BUILDING AXONOMETRIC 1 SCALE:1:20 1” = 20’-0” 2 SCALE:NTS SITE PLAN AND AXONOMETRIC SCALE: 1"=20' FEET 0 5' 10' 20' 40' 60' DRAWN BY: RFK CHECKED BY: JPJ JOB NO.: 30130.107 SHEET NO.: A030 All drawings and material appearing herein are the original and unpublished work of the architect and M U LT I - GENERATIONAL A NALOG C LA ss ROOM S may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without the written consent of Jones & Jones. JuneJ:\Bainbridge Sakai Park 30130\02-CAD\B-Arch\B0_Sheetset\A300 Analog.dwg_4/22/2019 12:32 PM 06, 2019 DRAFT Page 16 S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS BainbridgeSakai Island, Park WA NORTH SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNSET WEST FEASIBILITY STUDY SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE ELEC. 26 SF 4 A310 CLASSROOM 1 DECK 330 SF 308 SF MECHANICAL 126 SF 1 A310 LINE OF ROOF ABOVE STORAGE 69 SF WC 3 67 SF ENTRY CLASSROOM 2 A310 330 SF DATE: April 16 2019 REVISIONS: WINTER SOLSTICE SUNSET EAST 2 A310 WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE SOUTH FLOOR PLAN 1,110 SF + 308 SF DECK ANALOG BUILDING 1 SCALE:1/8"=1'-0" FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FEET 0 2' 4' 8' 16' 24' DRAWN BY: RFK CHECKED BY: JPJ JOB NO.: 30130.107 General Notes: Additional storage spaceSHEET NO.:will be A300 0 4 8 16 incorporated into nextAll drawingsphase and ofmaterial design. appearing herein are the original and unpublished work of the architect and M U LT I - GENERATIONAL A NALOG C LA ss ROOM S may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without 1/8” = 1’-0” the written consent of Jones & Jones. JuneJ:\Bainbridge Sakai Park 30130\02-CAD\B-Arch\B0_Sheetset\A300 Analog.dwg_4/22/2019 12:32 PM 06, 2019 DRAFT Page 17 S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS BainbridgeSakai Island, Park WA FEASIBILITY STUDY METAL ROOF, TYP. O/ SIP (STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS) O/ OPEN WEB METAL TRUSS LIVING ROOF W/ EXPOSED WOOD STRUCTURE @ OPEN ENTRY WAYS TYP. AND COMPUTER LAB WOOD DECKING W/ METAL HANDRAILS, TYP. METAL SIDING TYP. METAL AND WOOD TRELLIS SUNSHADES DATE: LARGE METAL WINDOWS, TYP. April 16 2019 PIN PILE CONCRETE FOOTING STRUCTURE, TYP. @ CANTELIVERS REVISIONS: 0 10 20 40 DIGITAL BUILDING SITE PLAN BUILDING AXONOMETRIC 1 SCALE:1:20 1” = 20’-0” 2 SCALE:NTS SITE PLAN AND AXONOMETRIC SCALE: 1"=20' FEET 0 5' 10' 20' 40' 60' DRAWN BY: RFK CHECKED BY: JPJ JOB NO.: 30130.107 SHEET NO.: A040 All drawings and material appearing herein are the original and unpublished work of the architect and M U LT I - GENERATIONAL D IGITAL B UIL D ING may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without the written consent of Jones & Jones. JuneJ:\Bainbridge Sakai Park 30130\02-CAD\B-Arch\B0_Sheetset\A400 Digital.dwg_4/22/2019 12:32 PM 06, 2019 DRAFT Page 19 S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS BainbridgeSakai Island, Park WA NORTH 1 SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE A410 DECK EAST 325 SF ROLL DOWN PROJECTION SCREEN W/ CEILING HUNG PROJECTOR FIREPLACE GAME TABLE GATHERING ROOM/ GAME ROOM SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNSET 815 SF LINE OF SOFFIT ABOVE FEASIBILITY GAME TABLE TELEVISION/SCREEN STUDY KITCHENETTE 88 SF REF. WC LINE OF METAL ROOF ABOVE 2 64 SF A410 WINTER SOLSTICE SUNRISE ELEC. AV MECHANICAL 30 SF 36 SF 100 SF LINE OF LIVING ROOF ABOVE PROJECTION SCREEN ENTRY COMPUTER LAB DATE: April 16 2019 315 SF WEST REVISIONS: 4 3 A410 A410 SOUTH WINTER SOLSTICE SUNSET FLOOR PLAN 1,836 SF + 325 SF DECK DIGITAL BUILDING 1 SCALE:1/8"=1'-0" FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FEET 0 2' 4' 8' 16' 24' DRAWN BY: RFK CHECKED BY: JPJ JOB NO.: 30130.107 General Notes: Additional storage spaceSHEET NO.:will be A400 0 4 8 16 incorporated into nextAll drawingsphase and ofmaterial design. appearing herein are the original and unpublished work of the architect and M U LT I - GENERATIONAL D IGITAL B UIL D ING may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without 1/8” = 1’-0” the written consent of Jones & Jones. JuneJ:\Bainbridge Sakai Park 30130\02-CAD\B-Arch\B0_Sheetset\A400 Digital.dwg_4/22/2019 12:32 PM 06, 2019 DRAFT Page 20 S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS BainbridgeSakai Island, Park WA OVERLOOK CAT WALK; WOOD DECKING W/ METAL HANDRAILS, TYP. METAL ROOF, TYP. LIVING ROOF @ RESTROOM O/ SIP (STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS) O/ OPEN WEB METAL TRUSS FEASIBILITY LIVING ROOF W/ EXPOSED STUDY WOOD STRUCTURE @ ENTRY OVERLOOK DECK, STAIR, AND ELEVATOR DATE: April 16 2019 REVISIONS: WOOD DECKING W/ METAL HANDRAILS, TYP. METAL AND WOOD TRELLIS SUNSHADES LARGE METAL WINDOWS, TYP. METAL SIDING TYP. PIN PILE CONCRETE FOOTING STRUCTURE, TYP. @ CANTELIVERS 0 10 20 40 OUTDOOR LEARNING SITE PLAN BUILDING AXONOMETRIC 1 SCALE:1:20 1” = 20’-0” 2 SCALE:NTS SITE PLAN AND AXONOMETRIC SCALE: 1"=20' FEET 0 5' 10' 20' 40' 60' DRAWN BY: RFK CHECKED BY: JPJ JOB NO.: 30130.107 SHEET NO.: A050 All drawings and material appearing herein are the original and unpublished work of the architect and O UT D OOR C ENTER may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without the written consent of Jones & Jones. JuneJ:\Bainbridge Sakai Park 30130\02-CAD\B-Arch\B0_Sheetset\A500 Outdoor.dwg_4/22/2019 12:33 PM 06, 2019 DRAFT Page 22 S AKAI P ARK S CHEMATIC D E S IGN ARCHITECTS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS PLANNERS BainbridgeSakai Island, Park WA NORTH SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNSET 1 A510 SUMMER SOLSTICE SUNRISE CATWALK DECK 860 SF DECK 480 SF LINE OF BUNKER BELOW FEASIBILITY STUDY MEN WEST CLASSROOM 1 CLASSROOM 2 977 SF 830 SF 168 SF EAST OPERABLE WALL MAINTENANCE ONLY LINE OF ROOF CATWALK ABOVE WOMEN HAND WASHING 168 SF SECONDARY EXIT STATION JAN.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What's Your Theory of Effective Schematic Map Design?
    What’s Your Theory of Effective Schematic Map Design? Maxwell. J. Roberts Department of Psychology University of Essex Colchester, UK [email protected] Abstract—Amongst designers, researchers, and the general general public accept or reject radical new creations. public, there exists a diverse array of opinion about good practice Furthermore, the lay-theories held by designers will affect the in schematic map design, and a lack of awareness that such products that they create and the recommendations that they opinions are not necessarily universally held nor supported by make. Similarly, the lay-theories of transport managers will evidence. This paper gives an overview of the range of opinion determine design specifications and the acceptance or rejection that can be encountered, the consequences that this has for of end-products. With so many different theories in circulation, published designs, and a framework for organising the various conflicts will be inevitable, hence the polarised response to the views. controversial Madrid Metro map of 2007, which generated a huge adverse reaction amongst residents: presumably, the Keywords—schematic mapping; lay-theories, expectations and transport authority believed that this was a sound design. prejudices; effective design; cognition; intelligence. Likewise, the adverse public response to the removal of the I. LAY-THEORIES OF DESIGN River Thames from the London Underground map in 2009. The lay-theory held by officials, presumably, was that the river Whenever I create a controversial new schematic map and was irrelevant to usability. The public disagreed, and the river publish it on the internet, the diversity of opinion that it evokes returned a few months later.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 4 Electronic Diagrams and Schematics
    ENGINEERING SYMBOLOGY, PRINTS, AND DRAWINGS Module 4 Electronic Diagrams and Schematics Engineering Symbology, Prints, & Drawings Electronic Diagrams & Schematics TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Co nte nts TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................ii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ iii REFERENCES ................................................................................................................iv OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 1 ELECTRONIC DIAGRAMS, PRINTS, AND SCHEMATICS ............................................ 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 2 Electronic Schematic Drawing Symbology .................................................................. 3 Examples of Electronic Schematic Diagrams .............................................................. 6 Reading Electronic Prints, Diagrams and Schematics ................................................. 8 Block Drawing Symbology ......................................................................................... 13 Examples of Block Diagrams ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vision & Implementation Plan
    Buffalo River Greenway Vision & Implementation Plan Implementation Guidelines for the Buffalo River, Cayuga Creek, Buffalo Creek and Cazenovia Creek within the City of Buffalo and Towns of Cheektowaga and West Seneca. Prepared For: Buffalo Niagara RIVERKEEPER® Prepared By: Lynn Mason, ASLA With Assistance From: Julie Barrett O’Neill Jill Spisiak Jedlicka Lynda Schneekloth May 2006 II TABLE OF CONTENTS FIGURE LIST pg. IV INVOLVED AGENCIES pg. VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY pg. VII I. GREENWAY VISION pg. 1 1. Greenway Benefits pg. 3 2. Buffalo River Greenway Project Area pg. 8 II. GREENWAY PLANNING HISTORY pg. 15 1. Recent Projects pg. 17 2. Recent Planning Projects pg. 28 III. EXISTING GREENWAY RESOURCES pg. 29 1. Parks & Parkways pg. 31 2. Conservation Areas pg. 37 3. Bike/Hike Trails pg. 38 4. Boat Launches and Marinas pg. 41 5. Fishing Access and Hot Spots pg. 41 6. Urban Canoe Trail and Launches pg. 42 7. Heritage Interpretation Areas pg. 44 IV. PROPOSED NEW GREENWAY ELEMENTS pg. 47 1. Introduction pg. 49 2. Buffalo River Trail Segments pg. 56 3. Site Specific Opportunities pg. 58 V. IMPLEMENTATION pg. 95 1. Introduction pg. 97 2. Implementation Strategies pg. 106 3. Leveraging Resources and Identifying Funding pg. 108 4. Legislative Action pg. 110 5. Education and Encouragement pg. 110 6. Operations and Maintenance pg. 111 7. Trail Development pg. 112 8. Design Guidelines pg. 181 APPENDIX/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION pg. 189 A. Existing Greenway Resources pg. 191 B. Prohibited Uses pg. 209 C. Phytoremediation pg. 213 D. Buffalo River Paper Streets: A Status Report pg. 215 REFERENCES pg.
    [Show full text]
  • How Neurons Exploit Fractal Geometry to Optimize Their Network Connectivity Julian H
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN How neurons exploit fractal geometry to optimize their network connectivity Julian H. Smith1,5, Conor Rowland1,5, B. Harland2, S. Moslehi1, R. D. Montgomery1, K. Schobert1, W. J. Watterson1, J. Dalrymple‑Alford3,4 & R. P. Taylor1* We investigate the degree to which neurons are fractal, the origin of this fractality, and its impact on functionality. By analyzing three‑dimensional images of rat neurons, we show the way their dendrites fork and weave through space is unexpectedly important for generating fractal‑like behavior well‑ described by an ‘efective’ fractal dimension D. This discovery motivated us to create distorted neuron models by modifying the dendritic patterns, so generating neurons across wide ranges of D extending beyond their natural values. By charting the D‑dependent variations in inter‑neuron connectivity along with the associated costs, we propose that their D values refect a network cooperation that optimizes these constraints. We discuss the implications for healthy and pathological neurons, and for connecting neurons to medical implants. Our automated approach also facilitates insights relating form and function, applicable to individual neurons and their networks, providing a crucial tool for addressing massive data collection projects (e.g. connectomes). Many of nature’s fractal objects beneft from the favorable functionality that results from their pattern repeti- tion at multiple scales 1–3. Anatomical examples include cardiovascular and respiratory systems4 such as the bronchial tree5 while examples from natural scenery include coastlines 6, lightning7, rivers8, and trees9,10. Along with trees, neurons are considered to be a prevalent form of fractal branching behavior11.
    [Show full text]
  • The Convergence of Graphics and Vision
    The Convergence of Graphics Cover Feature and Vision Approaching similar problems from opposite directions, graphics and vision researchers are reaching a fertile middle ground. The goal is to find the best possible tools for the imagination. This overview describes cutting- edge work, some of which will debut at Siggraph 98. Jed Lengyel t Microsoft Research, the computer vision sampled representations. This use of captured Microsoft and graphics groups used to be on opposite scenes (enhanced by vision research) yields richer Research sides of the building. Now we have offices rendering and modeling methods (for graphics) along the same hallway, and we see each other than methods that synthesize everything from A every day. This reflects the larger trend in our scratch. field as graphics and vision close in on similar problems. • Exploiting temporal and spatial coherence (sim- Computer graphics and computer vision are inverse ilarities in images) via the use of layers and other problems. Traditional computer graphics starts with techniques is boosting runtime performance. input geometric models and produces image se- • The explosion in PC graphics performance is quences. Traditional computer vision starts with input making powerful computational techniques more image sequences and produces geometric models. practical. Lately, there has been a meeting in the middle, and the center—the prize—is to create stunning images in real VISION AND GRAPHICS CROSSOVER: time. IMAGE-BASED RENDERING AND MODELING Vision researchers now work from images back- What are vision and graphics learning from each ward, just as far backward as necessary to create mod- other? Both deal with the image streams that result els that capture a scene without going to full geometric when a real or virtual camera is exposed to the phys- models.
    [Show full text]
  • How Scientists Develop Competence in Visual Communication Marilyn Ostergren
    How scientists develop competence in visual communication Marilyn Ostergren A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: David M. Levy, Chair Andrew J. Ko Jennifer A. Turns Allyson Carlyle Program Authorized to Offer Degree: The Information School ©Copyright 2013 Marilyn Ostergren University of Washington Abstract How scientists develop competence in visual communication Marilyn Ostergren Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Dr. David M. Levy Information School Visuals (maps, charts, diagrams and illustrations) are an important tool for communication in most scientific disciplines, which means that scientists benefit from having strong visual communication skills. This dissertation examines the nature of competence in visual communication and the means by which scientists acquire this competence. This examination takes the form of an extensive multi- disciplinary integrative literature review and a series of interviews with graduate-level science students. The results are presented as a conceptual framework that lays out the components of competence in visual communication, including the communicative goals of science visuals, the characteristics of effective visuals, the skills and knowledge needed to create effective visuals and the learning experiences that promote the acquisition of these forms of skill and knowledge. This conceptual framework can be used to inform pedagogy and thus help graduate students achieve a higher level of competency in this area; it can also be used to identify aspects of acquiring competence in visual communication that need further study. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To the chair of my committee, David Levy: I am deeply grateful for your mentorship, support and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • E11 Lecture 5: Design Representation
    E11 Lecture 5: Design Representation Prof. David Money Harris Fall 2014 Outline l Mechanical Design Representation l Orthographic Projections l Isometric Projections l Computer-Aided Design (CAD) l Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) l Autonomous Vehicle Chassis l Electronic Design Representation l Schematic Elements l Mudduino Schematic Design Representation l How to represent a 3-dimensional object on a 2- dimensional page? l Projections l Orthographic l Isometric Orthographic Projection l Front, top, and side views l orthos “straight” + graphic “drawing” l Used by Greek and Roman astronomers and engineers Orthographic Projection Top View S i d e V i e w Front View Isometric Projection l Shows three faces all at once l Preserves distances accurately along each axis l Angles between each axis are 120 degrees l iso = “equal” + metric = “measure” Isometric Projection 120o 60o 60o Example: I-beam Datum Features l Datum features are used to align the part l Make measurements from a consistent edge l Feature labeled “A” is the primary datum l Align the part to this edge whenever possible l Keep it flat against a vice during machining l Features “B” and “C” are secondary and tertiary datum Dimensioning l Dimensions are measured from the datum features l Only a minimum necessary set are shown l If a dimension isn’t labeled, it is implied by symmetry l Often you will need to make calculations l Mark up the drawing to make your life easier in the shop l Holes are specified by their diameter (∅) l Some dimensions have tolerances shown Example: Sensor
    [Show full text]
  • VISUAL COMMUNICATION a WRITER's GUIDE Second Edition
    VISUAL COMMUNICATION A WRITER’S GUIDE Second Edition Susan Hilligoss, Clemson University Tharon Howard, Clemson University New York Boston San Francisco London Toronto Sydney Tokyo Singapore Madrid Mexico City Munich Paris Cape Town Hong Kong Montreal i This work is protected by United States copyright laws and is provided solely for the use of instructors in teaching their courses and assessing student learning. Dissemination or sale of any part of this work (includ- ing on the World Wide Web) will destroy the integrity of the work and is not permitted.The work and materials from it should never be made available to students except by instructors using the accom- panying text in their classes.All recipients of this work are expected to abide by these restrictions and to honor the intended pedagogical pur- poses and the needs of other instructors who rely on these materials. Visual Communication: A Writer’s Guide, Second Edition, by Susan Hilligoss and Tharon Howard Copyright ©2002 Pearson Education, Inc. (Publishing as Longman Publishers.) All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Instructors may reproduce portions of this book for classroom use only. All other reproductions are strictly prohibited without prior permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. ISBN: 0-321-09981-8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - CRW - 04 03 02 01 i Contents Chapter 1 Why Visual Communication for Writers? 1 Chapter 2 First Impressions: Perception and Genres 7 Chapter 3 Second Impressions:
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS City Government Electric Department. 36 City Organizational Chart . 2 Fire Department . 40 Mayor’s Message . 3 Fletcher Free Library . 43 City Officials Appointed by the Mayor . 6 Human Resources Department . 46 Vermont Legislators . 7 Innovation & Technology. 48 Mayors of Burlington . 7 Parks, Re creation & Waterfront. 49 City Council . 8 Planning & Zoning Department . 55 City Council Standing Committees . 9 Police Department. 58 City Department Information . 10 Public Works Department . 61 Important Dates . 11 School District . 66 City Holidays. 11 Telecom, Burlington . 71 Board of School Commissioners . 12 Regional Organizations City Commissioners. 13 Annual Reports Neighborhood Planning Assemblies . 15 Burlington Housing Authority . 72 Regularly Scheduled Chittenden Solid Waste District . 73 Commission Meetings . 16 Green Mountain Transit . 75 Justices of the Peace . 17 Winooski Valley Park District . 77 Department Annual Reports Miscellaneous Airport, Burlington International . 18 Annual Town Meeting . 79 Arts, Burlington City . 20 Salaries. 81 Assessor, Office of the City . 23 General Obligation Debt. 100 Attorney, Office of the City . 24 Appraised Valuation. 100 Church Street Marketplace. 27 Tax Exempt Property Summary. 100 Clerk/Treasurer, Office of the City . 29 Management Letter . 101 Code Enforcement . 31 Audit Summary . 106 Community & Economic Development Office . 32 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Design/Production: Futura Design Printing: Queen City Printers Inc. Printed on PC Recycled Paper Cover Photo: Courtesy of Andrew Krebs Project Management: Liz Amler, Mayor’s Office This report also is available online at www.burlingtonvt.gov. Thanks to the Department of Parks, Recreation & Waterfront for the use of photos throughout this report. This publication was printed on 100% PC Recycled FSC® certified paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Geotime Information Visualization
    GeoTime Information Visualization Thomas Kapler and William Wright 1. Oculus Info Inc ABSTRACT of events over the single dimension of time. A Geographic Analyzing observations over time and geography is a common Information System (GIS) product, such as MS MapPoint, or task but typically requires multiple, separate tools. The objective ESRI ArcView, shows events in the single dimension of locations of our research has been to develop a method to visualize, and on a map. There are also link analysis tools, such as Netmap work with, the spatial inter-connectedness of information over (www.netmapanalytics.com) or Visual Links (www. time and geography within a single, highly interactive 3-D view. visualanalytics.com) that display events as a network diagram, or A novel visualization technique for displaying and tracking graph, of objects and connections between objects. Several events, objects and activities within a combined temporal and systems exist for tracking highly connected information, most geospatial display has been developed. This technique has been developed for police investigative purposes [Harries, 1999]. implemented as a demonstratable prototype called GeoTime in Analyst Notebook and CrimeLink, for example, provide tools for order to determine potential utility. Initial evaluations have been organizing and arranging fragments of information into with military users. However, we believe the concept is visualizations intended to help the analyst make sense of complex applicable to a variety of government and business analysis tasks. relationships. These tend to be one dimensional representations that show either organizational structures, timelines, CR Categories: H.5.2 [User Interfaces]: Graphical User communication networks or locations. In each case, only a thin Interfaces, I.3.6 [Computer Graphics]: Interaction Techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Schematic Storyboarding for Video Visualization and Editing
    Schematic Storyboarding for Video Visualization and Editing Dan B Goldman1 Brian Curless1 David Salesin1,2 Steven M .Seitz1 1University of Washington 2Adobe Figure 1 Left: Four still frames of a shot from the 1963 film Charade. Top: Schematic storyboard for the same shot, composed using the four frames at left. The subject appears in multiple locations, and the 3D arrow indicates a large motion toward the camera. The arrow was placed and rendered without recovering the 3D location of the subject. Bottom: Storyboard for the same shot, composed by a professional storyboard artist. (Credit: Peter Rubin.) Abstract 1 Introduction We present a method for visualizing short video clips in a sin- Video editing is a time-consuming process, in some part due to the gle static image, using the visual language of storyboards. These sheer volume of video material that must be repeatedly viewed and schematic storyboards are composed from multiple input frames recalled. Video editing software offers only token mnemonic assis- and annotated using outlines, arrows, and text describing the mo- tance, representing each video segment with only a single frame, tion in the scene. The principal advantage of this storyboard repre- typically defaulting to the segment’s first frame. But this frame is sentation over standard representations of video — generally either often unrepresentative of the video content, and in any case does a static thumbnail image or a playback of the video clip in its en- not illustrate other important aspects of the video, such as camera tirety — is that it requires only a moment to observe and compre- and subject motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Isometric Projections and Other Study and Display Methods Used in Preliminary Design of I-70 Through Glenwood Canyon
    Transportation Research Record 806 l Isometric Projections and Other Study and Display Methods Used in Preliminary Design of I-70 Through Glenwood Canyon JOSEPH R. PASSONNEAU The designers of I· 70 tl·1rough Glenwood Canyon, Colorado, were responsible rately contrived presentations but by using drawings to reviewers from many backgrounds. All wanted to find a good fit between peeled from the drafting boards at the beginning of highway and natural landscape, but their definitions of "good fit" varied. Ac· each meeting. curate graphic descriptions of the canyon and of alternative highway proposals were important to designers and reviewers. These were needed to show con· This paper first summarizes study and display ventional highway plans, profiles, and sections; to show the appearance of the techniques used in the design of I-70. It then highway in the natural landscape; and to show the precise relation between describes in detail an isometric method of drawing highway alternatives and landforms and plant communities taken or impinged upon. Canyon and highway alternatives were described by using conventional highway alternatives in a natural landscape that was artist's sketches, colored slides and black-and-white photographs, surveyed developed for this project. cross sections combined with perspective backgrounds, environmental maps, isometric drawings, composite drawings or "story boards", computer graphic TECHNIQUES USED IN DESIGN OF I-70 cross sections at close intervals, highway representations painted into photo· graphs, scale models, full-size mock-ups, and even diagrams and cartoons. An Conventional Sketches of Existing Landscape isometric projection technique developed for the project was particularly help· ful in the design of the highway in the western half of the canyon.
    [Show full text]