Orem, Utah: a Study in Urban Land Use

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Orem, Utah: a Study in Urban Land Use Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1976 Orem, Utah: A Study in Urban Land Use George G. Shaw Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Geography Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Shaw, George G., "Orem, Utah: A Study in Urban Land Use" (1976). Theses and Dissertations. 5102. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/5102 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 2 C 1 97& OREM UTAH i A STUDY IN URBAN LAND USE A thesis presented to the department of geography brighamBrighaldhaidharn young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of science by george G shaw april 1976 this thesis by george G shaw is accepted in its present form by the department of geography of brigham young university as satisfying the thesis re- quirementquirement for thee degreeagreeegree of master of science 4 y JL richardardlyH jacjackson ctbmmismitteemmitteetteeatee chairman ric ksontcsont robertaRobertlrobertlerobertl11 layton aifimitt&e member FU c-a n date robert L Layt6n D rtmeht chairman ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES e 9 s e e s v LIST OF illustrations vi acknowledgments vii chapter I1 introduction 1 statement of the problem the study area limitationsdelimitationsDe of study II11 REVIEW OF literature 5 land use theories forty eight selected cities milwaukee wisconsin salt lake city utah provotprovoprovos utah lilliiIII111 historical background AND GROWTH OF OREM UTAH 0 12 site and situation settlement urban growth description of study area IV methodology EMPLOYED 19 field work classification of land use computation of acreage computerization of data data extraction cartographic representation V LAND USE IN OREM stahlutahlUTAH 1975 272 residential commercial ililii111 iv chapter industrial public and quasi public streets agriculture vacant VI LAND USE BY CENSUS TRACT AND ZONE AND DENSITY 43 land use by census tract land use by zone developed land dwelling units population and density automobile space VII conclusions AND recommendations 74 land use comparisons land use summary the land use plan residential commercial industrial public and quasi public streets agriculture vacant APPENDIX e 0 0 1 90 bibliography 96 LIST OF TABLES table page 1 land use in selected american cities by percentage of use 7 2 land use in oremiboremi 1975 28 3 residential land use in orems 1975 31 4 commercial land use in oremiboremi 1975 34 5 industrial land use in oremioremboremi 1975 35 6 public and quasi public land use in oremiboremi 1975 38 7 agricultural land use in oremiboremi 1975 41 8 acreage in orem by census tract i 1975 1.1 45 9 land use in orem by census tract i 1975 46 10 land use in orem city by zoneigonei 1975 54 11 dwelling units in oremiboremi 1975 62 12 estimated population of oremioremboremi 1975 66 13 added dwelling units and population in oremioremboremi 1975 68 14 dwelling unit and population density in oremiboremi 1975 70 15 automobile space in oremiboremi 1975 73 16 land use change in orem citticitycityi 196519751965 1975 76 v LIST OF illustrations figure page 1 orem city utah county utah 13 2 the 1975 land use map of orem utah 26 3 single and multi family residential land in orem utah 30 4 commercial and industrial land in orem utah 33 5 public and quasi public land in orem utah 37 6 agricultural and vacant land in orem utah 40 7 census tracts in orem utah 44 8 zoning map of orem utah 56 9 percentage of single and multiple dwell- ing units by census tract in orem utah 64 10 distribution of 1975 population in orem utah 67 11 population density in orem utah 71 vi acknowledgments there are many to whom I1 am indebted for the completion of this thesis I1 am appreciative of randall deschamps direc- tor of orem city community development department and don W baird orem city zoning administrator for their assistance in the land use inventory for the geographical knowledge and cartographic skills which I1 have learned I1 am grateful to the fac- ulty of the department of geography of brigham young university I1 am especially grateful to the members of my committee dr richard jackson and dr robert layton for their help in bringing my research into final written form to my wife lorna I1 am grateful for support and c onstantconstantconstantenc ouraouragementencouragementgement vii CHAPTER I1 introduction orem utah is a good example of a community which is undergoing changes from rural to urban land uses where agricultural land is rapidly giving way to urban development A thorough land use inventory of the city is necessary in order to understand present land use characteristics an inventory was carried out and a land use plan was formulated from the data the urban environment is only one of the many areas of study that is of interest to geographers the study of spatial organization which has been em- phasizedphasized by modern geography makes the urban area a viable place for research geographers study the expansion and increasing reach of the metropolitan areas the spread of people and ideas from place to place and mansman own perception of the hazards and opportunities to be found in his environment with their concern for effective space management and through ap- plication of their scientific methods geographers provide a unique insight into mans status in his world taaffe 1970 many geographers have made contributions to the study of land use in urban areas land use theories have been proposed by burgess 1925 hoyt 1939 and 1 2 harris and ullman 1945 several contributions have been made in respect to urban location theories such as those of berry 1961967 1968 simmons 1964 gottman 1961 and murphy 19729-197219741974 statement of the problem it is no hidden fact that our nation is under- going rapid urbanization increasing demands are made on the land as raw acreage is converted to urban uses it is estimated that between 1974 and the year 2000 that approximately eighteen million acres in the united states will change to urban uses U S dept of agri- culture 1974 much of this acreage will come from present agricultural areas adjacent to urban centers the conversion of open space to urban uses pre- sents the problem of how to best use the new urban land poor urban land use can be found in most areas urban sprawl is stimulated by poorly distributed subdivisions with inadequate services construction in areas susceptible to natural hazards roads and land development on mountainsides and other environmentally sensitive areas and the reduction of open space and productive agricultural land germanow and grimsley 1973 the economic and social costsofcosts of poor use of land although not recognized by most people are appalling in respect to both communities and individuals 3 to combat these problems planners have sought to develop master plans to help direct urban growth an integral part of these plans is the actual land use plan to be implemented long range planning is impo- rtant and presents a major challenge in anticipating future growth in order to construct an urban land use plan a thorough inventory must be made of existing land use areas of probable growth and the best use of such land only by accomplishing this prerequisite can an accurate view of present land use be obtained and thus used in rational land use decision making log- ical land use change is then a greater possibility and many of the conflicts between land uses can be solved the study area the city of orem utah was chosen as the study area for a variety of reasons orem city initially was a rural agricultural community but has undergone many changes in the past three decades resultant rapid growth is evidenced by the changes in land use the community is now undergoing changes that larger cities have gone through much earlier and thus a land use in- ventory may help avoid many of the problems that our urban centers are experiencing the city is presently facing land use decisions of importance and the residents are concerned about the growth and what it 4 brings and also are concerned about the reduction of agricultural land in the city randall 1961976 the accessibility of the area for study the cooperation of the city employees and the availability of research materials were also important in selecting the study area A considerable amount of useful information can be extracted from a land use inventory for example many questions can be answered about the basic cha- racteristicsacteristics of the city and the use of land the land can be classified into general areas for useful analysis of land use by type other data which can be extracted include the number of specific land use activities within the city and the acreages involved the land use of neighborhoods or specific areas of the city the interrelationship of land use and zoning the total developed land in the community the total and character of dwelling units population and density and automobile space CHAPTER II11 REVIEW OF literature land use theories three basic land use theories have been used to explain urban structure they are the concentric zone theory the sector theory and the multi nuclei theory in the concentric zone model park burgess and mckenzie 1925 it was theorized that the american city was made up of five concentric
Recommended publications
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 SM U T A H T R A N S I T A U T H O R I T Y Our Mission Provide integrated mobility solutions to service life’s connections, improve public health and enhance quality of life. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 Finance Department Robert K. Biles Chief Financial Officer Troy Bingham Comptroller UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letter of Transmittal ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 7 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ………………………………………………………………………. 21 Organizational Chart ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 22 Board of Trustees and Administration …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24 System Map ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor’s Report …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 28 Management's Discussion and Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 31 Financial Statements Comparative Statements of Net Position ………………………………………………………………………… 40 Comparative Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position ………………………………... 42 Comparative Statements of Cash Flows …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 43 Comparative Statements of Fiduciary Net Position…………………………………………………………………………………………… 45 Comparative Statements
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Winter Fine Particulate Study (UWFPS) 2017 Final Report
    2017 Utah Winter Fine Particulate Study Final Report Submitted to the Utah Division of Air Quality (UDAQ) March 16, 2018 Munkhbayar Baasandorj University of Utah Steven Brown NOAA ESRL Sebastian Hoch University of Utah Erik Crosman University of Utah Russell Long EPA ORD Phillip Silva USDA Logan Mitchell University of Utah Ian Hammond Utah State University Randal Martin Utah State University Ryan Bares University of Utah John Lin University of Utah John Sohl Weber State University Jeff Page Weber State University i Stuart McKeen NOAA ESRL Christopher Pennell UDAQ Alessandro Franchin NOAA ESRL Ann Middlebrook NOAA ESRL Ross Petersen University of Utah Gannet Hallar University of Utah Dorothy Fibiger NOAA ESRL Caroline Womack NOAA ESRL Erin McDuffie NOAA ESRL Alexander Moravek University of Toronto Jennifer Murphy University of Toronto Amy Hrdina University of Toronto Joel Thornton University of Washington Lexie Goldberger University of Washington Ben Lee University of Washington Theran Riedel EPA ORD Andrew Whitehill EPA ORD Kerry Kelly University of Utah Jaron Hansen BYU Delbert Eatough BYU ii Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PM2.5 3 1.2 METEOROLOGY OF PCAPS AND EXCHANGE PROCESSES 5 1.3 OVERVIEW OF 2016-17 WINTER 6 1.4 SCIENTIFIC QUESTIONS AND STUDY GOALS 13 2 METHODS 15 2.1 TWIN OTTER MEASUREMENTS 15 2.1.1 INSTRUMENT PAYLOAD 15 2.1.2 TWIN OTTER FLIGHT STRATEGY 19 2.2 BALLOON OBSERVATIONS 21 2.3 NEWS HELICOPTER OBSERVATIONS 23 2.4 GROUND SITE NETWORK 24 2.4.1 CACHE VALLEY SITES 25 2.4.2 SALT LAKE VALLEY
    [Show full text]
  • Vendor Name Amount 5 BUCK PIZZA 757.41 $ 7 PEAKS 509.25 $ 801
    Vendor Name Amount 5 BUCK PIZZA $ 757.41 7 PEAKS $ 509.25 801 PROMOS $ 751.42 A B COMBS ELEMENTARY $ 100.00 A VIKING'S FEAST $ 627.31 A+ BOOK FAIRS $ 4,038.18 A+ PROMOTIONS $ 171.10 AAA KINGS APPLIANCE $ 74.00 AATG $ 75.00 ABBOTT, CHARLES $ 3,600.00 ABBOTT, DENISE $ 2,943.54 ABBOTT, SUSAN $ 204.79 ABNEY, KERRI $ 30.78 AB'S PROSHOP $ 499.00 ACADEMY SPORTS $ 4,284.90 ACE RENTS INC $ 370.25 ADA BADMINTON & TENNIS $ 652.50 ADA SOTO $ 5.00 ADAIR, JENNY $ 435.00 ADAMS, LORRAINE $ 1,091.85 ADOPT A NATIVE ELDER PROGRAM $ 40.00 ADTSEA $ 375.00 ADVANCED FOUR WHEET DRIVE SYSTEMS $ 782.00 ADVENTUREDOME THEME PARK $ 1,102.05 AFTER SCHOOL UTAH ASSOCIATION $ 590.00 AGLE, ALEXANDRA $ 67.31 AH YOU, CHARLES $ 31.96 AIBWSU-WEST HIGH SCHOOL $ 630.00 AIRE-MASTER OF SO UTAH $ 180.00 ALAN MEMBERSHIP $ 110.00 ALERT SERVICES, INC $ 57.32 ALEXANDER'S PRINT ADVANTAGE $ 370.66 ALEXANDRIA MONAHAN $ 447.35 ALICE JEROME $ 12.75 ALICIA HICKMAN $ 44.32 ALL AMERICAN SPORTSWEAR $ 735.00 ALL SPORTS UNIFORMS. NET $ 1,605.49 ALLENS $ 2,322.88 ALLEN'S CAMERA $ 3,416.93 ALLISON BAKER $ 8.95 ALLISON JENSEN $ 166.25 ALLISON WRIGHT $ 50.00 Page 1 of 61 Vendor Name Amount ALLRED, ALAN $ 1,455.87 ALLY LEY $ 20.00 ALMONEY, SARAH $ 147.00 ALOHA CATERING $ 296.00 ALPHAGRAPHICS $ 3,034.21 ALPINE MARINE IMPORTS $ 3,351.51 ALPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT $ 1,431.97 ALSCO $ 725.76 AM BANK $ 950.00 AMBER CURTIS $ 41.24 AMBER EGBERT $ 37.90 AMELIA EARHART $ 950.02 AMELIA EARHART PTA $ 20.00 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY $ 39.00 AMERICAN EXPERIENCE $ 52,695.00 AMERICAN EXPRESS $ 14,633.68 AMERICAN FORK HIGH SCHOOL $ 1,645.00 AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION $ 125.66 AMERICAN LEGACY PUBLISHING, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Saratoga Springs Transportation Master Plan
    Saratoga Springs TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 2021 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 WHERE WE ARE 6 ZONING AND LAND-USE ...................................................................................6 DEMOGRAPHICS ...............................................................................................8 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ............................................................................ 12 SAFETY ......................................................................................................... 17 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION .............................................................................. 23 TRANSIT ........................................................................................................ 25 3 WHERE WE’RE GOING 27 MODEL YEARS AND RESUltS ......................................................................... 30 RECOMMENDED 2050 ROADWAY NETWORK................................................. 34 SUMMARY OF WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS ...................................................... 37 4 WHAT WE HEARD 40 COMMUNITY INPUT ...................................................................................... 40 5 RECOMMENDATIONS 47 FUTURE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS ......................................................... 47 STANDARDS AND CROSS-SECTIONS ................................................................ 49 ACCESS MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 52 TRAFFIC CALMING ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • January 2019
    January 2019 Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary 2019 Update The Saratoga Springs Transportation Master Plan (TMP), adopted in 2012 and amended in 2013 and 2017, was updated in 2019. All updates included reflect the current roadway configurations per UDOT, other municipalities and future developments. The following includes a summary of the 2019 update: • Proposed 2040 roadway network • Capital Facilities Projects • New Local Roadway Cross-Section • New 5 Lane Cross-Section for 400 East North of Crossroads Blvd • Updated Foothill Boulevard alignment • Updated Transit section to include BRT Introduction Saratoga Springs is located in northwestern Utah County and is a rapidly growing community. According to the 2010 census, the City has been one of the fastest growing cities in Utah by percent growth over the past decade. This rapid growth is expected to continue into the future. With rapid growth comes increased traffic and the potential that the roadway network in the City will fail to meet the needs of the growing population. The purpose of this document is to provide a transportation plan that will meet the needs of the residents of Saratoga Springs through the year 2040. Existing Conditions The City has an estimated population of approximately 26,700 residents continues to be one of the fastest growing cities in Utah. Despite this rapid growth, there remain vast amounts of land that is undeveloped. The roadways in the City have been classified as Principal Arterials, Major Arterials, Minor Arterials, Collector Streets, Local Collector Streets, and Local roads. Each of these classifications serves a specific purpose in the roadway network and each is important to a complete system.
    [Show full text]
  • Minor League Baseballtm
    MINOR LEAGUE BASEBALLTM {Appendix 1.1, to Sports Facility Reports, Volume 20} Research completed as of July 9, 2019 INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE (AAA) Team: Buffalo Bisons Affiliate: Toronto Blue Jays (2013) Principal Owner: Robert E. Rich, Jr. Team Value As of July 2016, $34 million (Revenue: $12 million; Operating Income: $1.1 million) Team Website TWITTER: @BuffaloBisons Stadium: Sahlen Field Date Built: 1988 Facility Cost ($/Mil): $42 Facility Financing: The State of New York contributed $22 million and various other public entities paid for the remainder. Facility Website UPDATE: Wider seats were installed in the lower section of Sahlen Field prior to the 2019 season, further reducing seating capacity to 16,600. NAMING RIGHTS: The stadium was originally named Pilot Field. In 1995, the stadium was renamed North AmeriCare Park. In 1998, Dunn Tire Corp. took over the remaining eight years and $2.5 million on the naming rights contract with the City of Buffalo. Thus, the stadium was renamed Dunn Tire Park. Then in 2008, the Bisons agreed to a ten-year naming rights deal with the Coca-Cola Company. In 2018, a similar deal was signed with Sahlen Packing Company through 2028. © Copyright 2019, National Sports Law Institute of Marquette University Law School Page 1 Team: Charlotte Knights Affiliate: Chicago White Sox (1999) Principal Owner: Don Beaver & Bill Allen Team Value: As of 2016, 47.5 million (Revenue: 17.0 million Operating Income : 5.0 million) Team Website TWITTER: @KnightsBaseball Stadium: BB&T Ballpark Date Built: 2014 Facility Cost ($/Mil): $54 Facility Financing: The City of Charlotte funded $7.25 million through hotel taxes, Center City Partners funded $725,000, Mecklenburg County funded $8 million, and private investors funded the rest.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority
    Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority Thursday, October 25, 2018, 1:00-3:30 p.m. Utah Transit Authority Headquarters, 669 West 200 South, Salt Lake City, Utah Golden Spike Conference Rooms 1. Call to Order & Opening Remarks Chair Greg Bell 2. Pledge of Allegiance Cathie Griffiths 3. Safety First Minute Dave Goeres 4. General Public Comment Period Bob Biles The Board of Trustees invites brief comments from the public as defined below. 5. Item(s) for Consent Chair Greg Bell a. Approval of September 27, 2018 Board Meeting Report b. Approval of September 12, 2018 Stakeholder & Planning Committee Meeting Report c. Approval of October 10, 2018 Operations & Customer Experience Committee Meeting Report d. Financial Report & Dashboard for August 2018 e. 2018 Q3 Investment Report f. Finance & Audit Committee Approved $200,000- $999,000 Contracts, Change Orders & Disbursements 6. Director/Agency Report Steve Meyer, Interim Executive Director 7. Committee Updates Operations & Customer Experience Committee Update Trustee Alex Cragun a. R2018-10-01: Resolution Approving the December 2018 Nichol Bourdeaux Change Day Title VI Equity Analysis Finance & Audit Committee Update Trustee Jeff Acerson a. R2018-10-02: Resolution Authorizing Execution of an Trustee Bret Millburn & Interlocal Agreement to Fund the Davis-SLC Community Mary DeLoretto Connector Bus Rapid Transit Project Conceptual Engineering and Environmental Work b. R2018-10-03: Resolution Ratifying the Adoption of the Steve Meyer & Bob Biles 2019 Tentative Budget https://www.rideuta.com/Board-of-Trustees Live Streaming @ https://www.youtube.com/user/UTAride) c. R2018-10-04: Resolution Authorizing Execution of Mary DeLoretto Stakeholder Agreements for First/Last Mile Connection Program of Projects d.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Transit Authority [$218500000]
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 30, 2017 NEW ISSUE Ratings: [Fitch “AA”; Moody’s “A1”; S&P “A+”] See “MISCELLANEOUS—Bond Ratings” herein. In the opinion of Gilmore & Bell, P.C., Bond Counsel, under existing law and assuming continued compliance with certain re- quirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the interest on the 2018 Bonds (including any original issue dis- count properly allocable to an owner thereof) is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. Bond Counsel is also of the opinion that the interest on the 2018 Bonds is exempt from State of Utah individual income taxes. See “TAX MAT- TERS” herein. * [$218,500,000] Utah Transit Authority Subordinated Sales Tax Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 2018 * ithout any notice. Under no circumstances shall this PRELIMINARY The [$218,500,000] Subordinated Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2018, are issued by the Authority as fully–registered bonds and, when initially issued, will be in book–entry form, registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for The Deposito- ry Trust Company, New York, New York. DTC will act as securities depository for the 2018 Bonds. Principal of and interest on the 2018 Bonds (interest payable June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing [Decem- ber 15, 2018] are payable by ZB, National Association, dba Zions Bank, Corporate Trust Department, Salt Lake City, Utah, as rities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to Paying Agent, to the registered owners thereof, initially DTC.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Council of the Utah Transit Authority Wednesday, June 12, 2019, 1:00 P.M
    Regular Meeting of the Advisory Council of the Utah Transit Authority Wednesday, June 12, 2019, 1:00 p.m. Utah Transit Authority Headquarters 669 West 200 South, Salt Lake City, Utah Golden Spike Conference Rooms 1. Call to Order & Opening Remarks Chair Jeff Acerson 2. Pledge of Allegiance Chair Jeff Acerson 3. Safety First Minute Sheldon Shaw 4. Public Comment Period Karen Cronin 5. Approval of March 20, 2019 Advisory Board Meeting Minutes Chair Jeff Acerson 6. Board of Trustees Report Carlton Christensen and Beth Holbrook 7. Agency Report Steve Meyer 8. Audit Committee Report Chair Jeff Acerson and Troy Walker a. 2018 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) 9. Policy Consultation Lisa Bohman State statute 17B-2a-808.1 Section 2(t) indicates that board policies shall be developed and approved by the UTA Board of Trustees in consultation with the UTA Local Advisory Council. a. Board Policy 1.1 Process for Establishing Board Policies b. Board Policy 1.2 Ethics c. Board Policy 2.1 Financial Management d. Board Policy 2.2 Contract Authority and Procurement e. Board Policy 3.1 Advertising and Naming f. Board Policy 4.2 Public Records g. Board Policy 5.2 Real Property h. Revision of Bylaws Website: https://www.rideuta.com/Board-of-Trustees Live Streaming: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=utaride 10. Budget Consultation Bob Biles State statute 17B-2a-808.1 Section 2(c) indicates that annual budgets shall be created and approved by the UTA Board of Trustees after consultation with the UTA Local Advisory Council. a. Budget Process Overview b.
    [Show full text]
  • Vendor Name Amount 26.2 RUNNING COMPANY 102.39 $ 5 BUCK
    Vendor Name Amount 26.2 RUNNING COMPANY $ 102.39 5 BUCK PIZZA $ 501.45 7 PEAKS $ 374.00 801 PROMOS $ 345.60 A+ BOOK FAIRS $ 2,495.19 A+ PROMOTIONS $ 105.90 AARON MOORE $ 23.25 AATG $ 80.00 ABBOTT, DENISE $ 697.34 ABC LAMINATING $ 75.00 ABC-TEES, INC $ 829.25 ACADEMY SPORTS $ 2,211.55 ACCENT PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS $ 991.95 ACE RENTS INC $ 61.00 ACKLEY, BECCA $ 59.99 ACT $ 4,037.50 ADAMS, DAN $ 300.00 ADAMS, LORRAINE $ 151.12 ADAMS, PATTY $ 344.99 ADTSEA $ 75.00 AGILE SPORTS TECHNOLOGIES $ 800.00 AGUADO, ANA $ 40.00 AGUAYO, JESUS $ 1.01 AGUAYO, MELISSA $ 17.99 AIBWSU-GRANITE ED. FOUNDATION $ 332.50 AIRE-MASTER OF SO UTAH $ 330.00 ALCATRAZ CRUISES, LLC $ 2,350.00 ALCATRAZ MEDIA $ 1,429.00 ALEXANDER'S PRINT ADVANTAGE $ 401.79 ALEXANDRIA MONAHAN $ 237.83 ALGER, DEANNA $ 39.00 ALINC ADP LEMCO, INC. $ 1,320.00 ALL FOR KIDZ $ 2,646.00 ALLEN, CHRISTOPHER $ 80.00 ALLEN, TRENTON $ 20.00 ALLENS $ 913.52 ALLEN'S CAMERA $ 4,397.72 ALLEN-VAN PATTEN, SONNET G $ 50.00 ALLISON JEPSEN $ 706.21 ALLMAN, CLAUDIA $ 107.25 ALLRED, ALAN $ 1,204.03 ALLRED, CHASE $ 20.00 Page 1 of 62 Vendor Name Amount ALLYSE'S BRIDAL $ 480.00 ALMOST HOME $ 1,020.00 ALONSO, BRIGGITTE $ 21.96 ALONSO, CECILIA $ 8.96 ALPHAGRAPHICS $ 3,069.39 ALPINE ELECTRONICS $ 150.00 ALPINE MARINE IMPORTS $ 3,653.82 ALPINE SCHOOL DIST WAREHOUSE $ 1,251.58 ALPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT $ 1,135.26 ALSCO $ 1,032.24 ALYCE JAYNE MCKINNEY $ 279.70 ALYSON CALAWAY $ 35.76 AM BANK $ 300.00 AMANDA MOON $ 22.70 AMANDA NOYES $ 65.00 AMAR TURASOA $ 3.30 AMBER CURTIS $ 14.86 AMBER EGBERT $ 71.42 AMELIA EARHART ELEMENTARY
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Master Plan 2020 Provo City Transportation Master Plan 2020
    PROVO CITY Transportation Master Plan 2020 Provo City Transportation Master Plan 2020 Acknowledgements Provo City Mayor and Deputy Mayor Michelle Kaufusi, Mayor Isaac Paxman, Deputy Mayor Provo City Council Shannon Ellsworth, Council Member Bill Fillmore, Council Member George Handley, Council Member Dave Harding, Council Member Travis Hoban, Council Member Dave Sewell, Council Member David Shipley, Council Member Provo City Planning Commission Dave Anderson Andrew Howard Deborah Jensen Lisa Jensen Robert Knudsen Russ Phillips Laureen Urquiaga Maria Winden Provo City Transportation Mobility and Advisory Committee David Arnold Clancy Black James Hamula Deborah Jensen Stephen Mongie Joy McMurray Mitsuru Saito Provo City Administration Wayne Parker, Chief Administrative Officer Nicole Martin, Community Relations/Public Information Officer 1 Provo City Transportation Master Plan 2020 Provo City Public Works Dave Decker, Public Works Director David Graves, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer David Day, Engineer Jared Penrod, Engineer Jonathan Knight, Engineer Casey Serr, Engineer Shane Winters, Engineer Parametrix Charles Allen, Engineer Michael Baker, Planner George Benford, Principal Elizabeth Diamond, Engineer Vern Keeslar, Project Manager Ian Kilpatrick, Planner Heather McLaughlin-Kolb, Graphic Designer Tim Peterson, Planner Rhianna Riggs, Marketing Jennifer Rose, Administration Kyle Stahley, Engineer Kai Tohinaka, Planner Claire Woodman, Planner Township + Range Tim Sullivan About Parametrix Parametrix is a 100-percent employee-owned firm dedicated to providing high quality, client- oriented planning, engineering, and environmental consulting services. Founded in Washington in 1969, Parametrix has 14 offices located in the Western U.S. with a staff of 500 professionals providing multidisciplinary services in transportation, environmental planning and compliance, water resources, and community building. The Utah office of Parametrix serves the transportation planning and traffic engineering markets in Utah and the Intermountain West.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome the PIFL and the RFL
    THE COFFIN CORNER: Vol. 21, No. 1 (1999) Are You Ready for Even More Football? Welcome the PIFL and the RFL By Stuart Kantor When Ted Turner and NBC announced, or rather, teased us with information regarding their plans to initiate a new football Ieague as a directed challenge to the obelisk NFL, a thought raced through my head: Why? Surely the precedent had been set. The NFL has met all comers, from a plethora of AFLs to the WFL and the USFL. In fact, the NFL just folded one of its own farm teams of NFL Europe (formerly the WLAF), the England Monarchs, winners of the first WLAF championship, due to poor attendance. So what would cause people in their right mind to want to start a new league? And who would invest in such a thing? Well, 12 years ago, the Arena Football League, the brainchild of James F. Foster, got off the ground, and the 50-Yard Indoor War, as it’s billed, is enjoying tremendous success. Thus, with success comes imitation. Say heIlo to the Professional Indoor Football League, the PIFL. Headquartered in Las Vegas, the PIFL started play on April 11, 1998 with eight franchises and a 14-game schedule cuIminating in the PlFL Championship game August 15, 1998 at the Maravich Center on the LSU campus. The original eight under the guise of Commissioner Dick Suess are: the Green Bay Bombers, the Madison (WI) Mad Dogs, the Louisiana Bayou Beast (Baton Rouge), the Honolulu Hufficanes, the Colorado Wildcats (Denver), the Texas Bullets (Belton), the Utah Catzz (Salt Lake City), and the Minnesota Monsters (Twin Cities).
    [Show full text]