<<

PAPERS BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.300.6718.151 on 20 January 1990. Downloaded from

Immunoscintigraphy for detecting acute without electrocardiographic changes

Diwakar Jain, Avijit Lahiri, Edward B Raftery

Abstract tions2; this technique has a high sensitivity and Objective-To establish whether immunoscinti- specificity. graphy with antibody to myosin may detect acute We describe the use of myosin antibody labelled myocardial infarction without electrocardiographic with indium-111 as a diagnostic tool in patients changes. with suspected acute myocardial infarction without Design-Prospective study of patients with sus- electrocardiographic changes. pected acute myocardial infarction or unstable with cardiac imaging with "'indium myosin antibody, estimation of cardiac enzyme concentra- Patients and methods tions, , 20Ithallium imaging, and One hundred and nineteen consecutive patients radionuclide ventriculography. admitted to the of this hospital with Setting-Coronary care unit in a district general <48 hours duration suspected to be due to hospital. acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina had Patients-119 Consecutive patients with suspec- immunoscintigraphy with "'In myosin antibody. ted acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Patients with , , valvular Patients with cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, valvular disease, myocardial infarction, or cardiac surgery heart disease, myocardial infarction or cardiac in the preceding two weeks or those in whom the surgery in the previous two weeks or with left electrocardiogram showed left bundle branch block and women of childbearing age were excluded, as were women of childbearing age. were excluded. Twelve lead electrocardiograms were performed at the Results-Of 75 patients with suspected acute time of admission, during episodes of chest pain, and myocardial infarction, seven had no diagnostic daily during the period of hospital stay. Blood samples electrocardiographic changes despite normal con- were collected six to eight hourly for 48-72 hours for duction patterns. Immunoscintigraphy with myosin estimating total serum creatine kinase concentration antibody disclosed necrosis in all seven patients, and its MB isoenzyme concentration. The Fab fraction which was localised in regions supplied by diseased of murine monoclonal myosin antibody (0-5 mg) http://www.bmj.com/ in all but one. Six patients had (Myoscint, Centocor, United States) was labelled with abnormal images on 20'thallium imaging, and all 74-83 MBq of "'In and was injected intravenously soon seven had abnormal wall motion at the site of after admission. Planar gammacamera imaging was antibody uptake. One patient with minimal left main performed in three standard views (anterior, left stem and right coronary artery atheroma had uptake anterior oblique, and left lateral) at 24 and 48 hours of antibody at two discrete sites. after the injection of tracer. Conclusions-Immunoscintigraphy with antibody The scans were compared with conventional non-

to myosin confirms myocardial infarction in the invasive radionuclide techniques: scanning with on 1 October 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. absence of electrocardiographic changes and dis- thallium-201 for assessing regional blood flow of the closes the site of infarction. myocardium and 99Tc blood pool scanning for assess- ing abnormalities of the left ventricular chamber (abnormal wall motion and ejection fraction). The 20'Tl Introduction scans were performed during the second (48 hour) The diagnosis ofacute myocardial infarction is based imaging with labelled myosin antibody with identical on typical chest pain, evolving electrocardiographic views and 740 MBq of 20'T1. Blood pool scans were changes, and increased concentrations ofserum cardiac obtained two to six weeks later with the in vivo enzymes. Patients commonly present, with Department of however, labelling method for red cells and 740 MBq 99Tc. The and Division of Clinical chest pain and a small increase in cardiac enzyme "gated" images were acquired in the same three views, Sciences, Northwick Park concentrations but with no electrocardiographic from which abnormal wall motion was defined and Hospital and Clinical changes of acute myocardial infarction. Several non- ejection fraction was calculated. Selective coronary Research Centre, Harrow cardiac conditions may also produce a small increase arteriography was also performed at two to six weeks. HAI 3UJ in cardiac enzyme concentrations, even in the MB The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was Diwakar Jain, MRCP, isoenzyme of creatine kinase.' This observation based on the presence of at least two of the three honorary registrar has lent impetus to the development of a new imaging standard criteria: chest pain, increased cardiac enzyme Avijit Lahiri, FACC, honorarv technique that may be used to detect and localise concentration, and evolving electrocardiographic consultant necrotic myocardium. studies Edward B Raftery, FRCP, Experimental have changes. The patients were classified into three diag- consultant cardiologist shown that antibody against the cardiac contractile nostic categories: acute myocardial infarction, unstable protein myosin binds specifically to the myocardial angina, and no evidence of acute myocardial infarction Correspondence to: Dr cells if there is irreversible injury to the cell mem- or resting ischaemia. Raftery. brane. When the antibody is labelled with a radioactive The images obtained with labelled myosin antibody isotope a standard gammacamera can be used to were interpreted independently for evidence of BrMedJ 1990;300:151-3 localise experimental' and human myocardial infarc- abnormal uptake of tracer and its localisation in the

BMJ VOLUME 300 20 JANUARY 1990 151 Characteristics ofand scintigraphicfindings in patients with acute myocardial infarction but without diagnostic electrocardiograms

Previous Peak creatine "'Ti Wall Left ventricular Case myocardial kinase Location of uptake of "'In labelled perfusion motion ejection No Age Sex infarction Coronary artery affected (%) (IU/1) antibody to myosin defect abnormality fraction

1 41 M _ Left circumflex (100) 1205 Apex + 76 2 50 M - Left main (<25) 844 Two discrete sites + + 69 3 48 M - Left anterior descending (50) 429 Anterior wall + + 47 BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.300.6718.151 on 20 January 1990. Downloaded from 4 62 M - Left anterior descending (99) 559 Apex + + 58 5 65 M - Left circumflex (95) 382 Apex, lateral wall + + 57 6 46 M Inferior wall Left circumflex (100) 945 Lateral wall + + 52 7 79 F Anterior and Left anterior descending, right coronary inferior wall artery (100) 823 Lateral wall, interventricular septum + + 26

+ = Present, - absent. myocardium. The images obtained with 2'°thallium diseased coronary arteries (figs 1 and 2). One patient were interpreted for any evidence of abnormalities of had uptake ofthe labelled antibody at two discrete sites myocardial perfusion.6 The blood pool ventriculo- (fig 2), and the rest all had a single region of uptake grams were analysed for abnormalities in wall motion, involving one or more contiguous walls of the left and the left ventricular ejection'fraction was determined ventricle. The myocardial infarction in these seven using standard techniques.7 All images were interpre- patients was further confirmed by the presence of a ted blind by a panel of three expert investigators with localised perfusion abnormality in six and regional wall standard computer enhanced images. motion abnormalities in all. The study was approved by the hospital ethical No adverse effects were observed in any patient after committee, and informed consent was obtained from administration of labelled myosin antibody, and the each patient. blood samples obtained two weeks and six weeks after its injection showed no antibody response. Results Of the 119 patients who had imaging, 75 had acute Discussion myocardial infarction, 17 unstable angina, and 27 no An appreciable proportion of patients with acute evidence ofinfarction or resting ischaemia. The images myocardial infarction show no changes on serial obtained with labelled myosin antibody were of good electrocardiography. We observed this phenomenon in quality and easy to interpret, and differentiating 9% of our patients with acute myocardial infarction. negative from positive images was not difficult. Furthermore, it is well known that acute infarction is Seventy four of the 75 patients with acute myocardial difficult to diagnose with , infarction had positive images with labelled myosin pre-excitation syndromes, and old infarction scars. An antibody, seven of whom had typical chest pain and alternative method of diagnosing infarction is needed increase in cardiac enzyme concentration but did not in these patients but in this study we excluded patients have any electrocardiographic evidence of acute myo- with uninterpretable electrocardiograms and concen- cardial infarction. The table outlines the clinical trated on those with no electrocardiographic changes. characteristics and the scintigraphic findings in these The twelve lead electrocardiogram has a low sensitivity patients. Only two out of the seven patients had had a for diagnosing small apical, lateral wall, and non- previous myocardial infarction; all but one had signi- transmural infarctions,"9 but serial estimation of the

ficant (>50%) on angiography, concentration of enzymes released from the necrotic http://www.bmj.com/ and localisation of labelled myosin antibody was myocardium into the blood is a more sensitive method observed in the myocardial segments supplied by the of diagnosing acute myocardial infarction.'0 These estimations are not, however, infallible as cardiac enzyme concentrations may be increased in other conditions.' No single cut offpoint between the normal and abnormal concentrations of creatine kinase and creatine kinase MB can invariably separate infarction

from non-infarction. Furthermore, the site of on 1 October 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. myocardial injury cannot be determined by enzymatic methods. Direct visualisation of the necrotic myocardium by an imaging technique would plainly be highly valuable. Tc-pyrophosphate has been used as a "hot spot" imaging agent for acute myocardial infarction, but the technique is marred by appreciable extracardiac uptake and non-specific uptake by ischaemic (as opposed to necrotic) myocardium." 12 On the other hand, the specificity of antibodies to myosin for necrotic myo- cardium has been firmly established in experimental studies.4 In a necroscopic study, when a patient died -I-, -.." 1-1 suddenly after acute myocardial infarction and cardiac I 11 I . III aVR aVL aVF rupture after having received "'In labelled antibody 12 hours before death, the sites of uptake of tracer were closely correlated with histologically outlined areas of myocardial necrosis.'3 Of course, this technique is not specific for acute myocardial infarction alone. Any VI V2 other condition producing myocardial necrosis (for V3 V4 V5 V6 example, viral myocarditis or transplant rejection) would also result in uptake of the labelled antibody by FIG 1-Top: Images with "'In labelled antibody to myosin ("'In-AM) in anterior (Ant) and left anterior But the in oblique (Lao) views in patient with acute myocardial infarction without electrocardiographic changes (case I the heart.'4'5 pattern is entirely different in table). Bottom: Electrocardiogram from same patient. L=liver, S=sternum; arrow denotes site of these conditions, producing a picture of generalised abnortnal uptake ofantibody in apex uptake quite unlike that observed in acute infarction.

152 BMJ VOLUME 300 20 JANUARY 1990 camera. The images are clear and easy to interpret. The technique will, however, need to be refined before it is useful for selecting patients for thrombolytic treatment because a delay of at least 18-24 hours must occur between administering the tracer and cardiac imaging to permit its clearance from the blood. On the other

hand, the technique may be useful for objective BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.300.6718.151 on 20 January 1990. Downloaded from assessment ofmyocardial salvage using the wide variety ofthrombolytic agents in current use. Experience with this technique so far has been encouraging, and it will be used increasingly in managing patients admitted to coronary care units with suspected acute myocardial infarction. This study was supported by a grant from Centocor, Malvern, Pennsylvania, United States. We acknowledge the help ofMiss Usha Raval and Mr David Hinge in this study. II.. ~~~aVR 1 Navin TR, Hager DW. Creatine kinase MB isoenzyme in the evaluation of aVL myocardial infarction. In: Harvey EJ, ed. Current problems in cardiology. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers 1979;3:7-32. 2 Khaw BA, Yasuda T, Gold HK, et al. Acute myocardial infarction imaging with indium- 111 labelled monoclonal antimyosin Fab. J7 Nucl Med 1987;28: 1671-8. 1V2 3 Khaw BA, Scott J, Fallon JT, Cahill SL, Haber E, Homcy C. Myocardial injury: quantitation by cell sorting initiated with antimyosin fluorescent V6 spheres. Science 1982;217:1050-3. V5 4 Khaw BA, Fallon JT, BelIer GA, Haber E. Specificity of the location of myosin specific antibody fragments in experimental myocardial infarction: FIG 2-Top: Images with ...In labelled antibody to myosin in anterior (Ant) and left antenior oblique (Lao) histologic, histochemical, autoradiographic and scintigraphic studies. viewvs in patient with acute myocardial i'nfarcti'on without changes (case 2 in table), Circulatiwn 1979;60:1527-31. electrocardiographi'c 5 Berger HJ, Lahiri A, Leppo J, et al. Antimyosin imaging in patients with showing discrete uptake ofradiotracer at two si'tes (arrowed). Embolisation from lesion in left main coronary ischaemic chest pain: initial results of phase III multicentre trial [Abstract]. artery may have produced myocardial necrosis at two different si'tes. Bottom: Electrocardiogramfrom same J Nucl Med 1988;29:805. patient 6 O'Hara MJ, Lahiri A, Whittington JR, Crawley JCW, Raftery EB. The detection of high risk coronary artery disease by thallium imaging. Furthermore, there is no evidence that "'In labelled BrHeartJ 1985;53:616-23. myosin antibody can be taken up by non-necrotic 7 Hains ADB, Al-Khawaja I, Hinge DA, Lahiri A, Raftery EB. Radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction: a comparison of three methods. Br HeartJ myocardium.2 1987;57:242-6. Patients with suspected myocardial infarction but 8 Savage RM, Wagner GS, Ideker R, Podosky SA, Hackel DB. Correlation of post mortem anatomic findings with electrocardiographic changes in without electrocardiographic or enzymatic evidence of patients with myocardial infarction: retrospective study of patients with infarction have a similar reported incidence of subse- typical anterior and posterior infarcts. Circulation 1977;55:279-85. 9 Raunio H, Rissanen V, Rompannen T, et al. Changes in QRS complex and ST quent cardiac events to those with a positive diagnosis segment in transmural and subendocardial infarctions. A clinicopathologic of acute infarction.1617 There are several possible study. Am HeartJ' 1979;98:176-83. explanations for this apparent anomaly; the most likely 10 Roberts R, Henry PD, Sobel BE. An improved basis for enzymatic estimation of infarct size. Circulation 1975;52:743-54. is that the infarctions were not detected by conventional 11 Turi ZG, Rutherford JD, Roberts R, et al. Electrocardiographic, enzymatic methods in the group with suspected myocardial and scintigraphic criteria of acute myocardial infarction as determined from study of 726 patients (a Milis study). AmJ Cardiol 1985;55:1467-8. infarctions. Imaging with labelled antibody to myosin 12 Fisher M, Kelemen MH, Collins D, et al. '"Tc-pyrophosphate scintigraphy in

has also been used for identifying a high risk group patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction: impact ofinterobserver http://www.bmj.com/ variability. Am HeartJ 1985;110:347-52. after acute myocardial infarction,'8 and this technique 13 Jain D, Lahiri A, Crawley JCW, Raftery EB. Post mortem correlation may have wider applications. In our study the site of between histopathologic and autoradiographic extent ofmyocardial necrosis uptake of the antibody was closely correlated with the detected by "1In-antimyosin imaging in a patient with acute myocardial infarction. AmericanJournal ofCardiac Imaging 1988;2:158-61. abnormalities detected by conventional imaging tech- 14 Carrio I, Bena L, Ballester M, et al. Indium- 111 antimyosin scintigraphy to niques. The uptake of antibody noted at two discrete assess myocardial damage in patients with suspected myocarditis and cardiac rejection.INuclMed 1988;29:1893-1900. sites in a patient with minor plaques in the left main 15 Hall TS, Baumgartner WA, Borkon AM, et al. Diagnosis of acute cardiac and right coronary arteries (fig 1) may have been due to rejection with antimyosin monoclonal antibody, phosphorus nuclear mag- netic resonance imaging, two dimensional echocardiography and endo- embolic infarction. cardial biopsy. J Heart Transplant 1986;5:419-24. on 1 October 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Our results indicate that the standard serial 12 lead 16 Madsen JK, Hansen JF. The prognosis for patients admitted to a coronary care electrocardiogram may fail to detect acute myocardial unit due to suspected acute myocardial infarction with and without confirmed diagnosis. Acta Med Scand 1982;211:453-7. infarction in nearly a 10th of patients admitted with 17 Schroeder JS, Lamb IM, Hu M. Do patients in whom myocardial infarction typical chest pain and suspected infarction. A definite has been ruled out have a better prognosis after hospitalisation than those surviving infarction? N EnglJ3 Med 1980;303:1-5. diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction may be made 18 Jain D, Lahiri A, Crawley JCW, Berger H, Raftery EB. Signficance of diffuse with imaging "'In antibody to myosin, which seems to uptake of "'In-antimyosin in acute myocardial infarction [Abstract]. Nucl be a useful and a safe technique that can be easily Med Comm 1988;9:163. carried out in any centre equipped with a gamma- (Accepted 17 November 1989)

ONE HUNDRED YEARS AGO

It will be remembered that a law came into force in the State ofNew York a capital sentence. Another death from electricity is reported by telegraphic year ago directing that the death penalty shall in future be inflicted by dispatches from New York this week. A horse touched a post which had electricity. A murderer was shortly afterwards found guilty and sentenced accidentally become connected with an electric-light wire; the animal was to be put to death by this means. He appealed against the sentence on the thrown to the ground but not killed, but a man who ran to its assistance, and ground that the lawwas unconstitutional, the proposed method ofexecution also touched the post, was instantly struck dead. The coroner's jury, in the being cruel and repugnant to public morals. The State Court rejected the case of the shopman who was killed by an electric light wire coming in appeal, which was then carried to the Supreme Court of the United States. contact with a showcase which he was helping to carry, has given a verdict The Supreme Court has decided that the law is constitutional. It is stated throwing the whole responsibility on the electric light company, and the that the main opposition has really come from companies holding patents of grand jury has indicted the superintendent of lamps to the company for electrical apparatus ofthe kind which it is proposed to use in carryingout the manslaughter. (BritishMedicalJournal 1890;i: 195)

BMJ VOLUME 300 20 JANUARY 1990 153