MAIN New Revise TRP[2]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MAIN New Revise TRP[2] The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, Aruba January 2018 Updated version 1 Wolfs Company IVM YABI Sarphatistraat 370 Institute for Environmental Boroncana 223A 1018 GW, Amsterdam Studies Noord The Netherlands VU University Amsterdam Aruba T: +31 20 520 6993 De Boelelaan 1087 T: +297 560 2700 E: 1081 HV, Amsterdam E: [email protected] [email protected] The Netherlands T: +31 20 598 9555 F: +31 20 598 9553 E: [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are extended to all those whom participated in the workshop on the 28/29 April 2016, many of whom have contributed through expert interviews and sharing invaluable knowledge (see annex for a stakeholders list). Also to the principle funders of this project SETAR N.V. Corporate Social Responsibility Fund, without whom the research would not have been carried out. Additionally, a special thanks to the University of Aruba, whose students participated in data collection. Lead authors: Timothy Polaszek, Consultant, Wolfs Company, Sarphatistraat 370, Amsterdam. Francielle Lacle, Consultant, YABI Consultancy, Aruba. Prof. Pieter van Beukering, Associate Professor, Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. Esther Wolfs, Partner, Wolfs Company, Sarphatistraat 370, Amsterdam. This report was commissioned by the Department of Nature and the Environment of the Aruban Government and SETAR N.V. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of Wolfs Company. 2 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ 2 Table of Contents .................................................................................................. 3 List of acronyms & abbreviations ....................................................................... 5 List of figures ......................................................................................................... 6 List of tables ........................................................................................................... 7 Executive summary .................................................................................................. 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 11 General background ............................................................................................ 11 Research Area ...................................................................................................... 15 Selection of ecosystem services ............................................................................ 17 Research scope .................................................................................................... 19 Research objectives ............................................................................................. 20 Project organization ............................................................................................ 22 Report outline ...................................................................................................... 22 References ............................................................................................................ 23 2. Theoretical Background and valuation methods ................................ 24 Ecosystem service valuation ................................................................................. 26 Ecosystems of Aruba ............................................................................................ 31 MARINE ............................................................................................................... 33 TERRESTRIAL ........................................................................................................ 34 Threats to the ecosystems ................................................................................... 37 References ........................................................................................................... 40 3. Local Cultural Services ............................................................................. 42 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 42 3.2 Methodology ................................................................................................. 43 3.3 Results ........................................................................................................... 48 Hotspot mapping - PPGIS ..................................................................................... 53 Crowdsourcing - Social Media - Instagram ........................................................... 59 3.4 Conclusion and recommendations .................................................................. 60 3.5 References ..................................................................................................... 62 4. Tourism ...................................................................................................... 63 4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 63 4.2 Methodology ................................................................................................. 65 4.3 Results ........................................................................................................... 67 4.4 Conclusion...................................................................................................... 75 4.5 References ..................................................................................................... 76 5. Fisheries ..................................................................................................... 77 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 77 5.2 Methodology ................................................................................................. 81 3 Data collection ..................................................................................................... 85 5.3 Results ........................................................................................................... 94 5.4 Conclusion...................................................................................................... 97 5.5 References ..................................................................................................... 99 6. Agriculture ............................................................................................... 100 6.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................100 6.2 Methodology ................................................................................................101 6.3 Results ..........................................................................................................102 6.4 Conclusions & Discussion...............................................................................106 6.5 References ....................................................................................................108 7. Medicinal Plants ...................................................................................... 109 7.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................109 7.2 Methodology ................................................................................................109 7.3 Results ..........................................................................................................110 7.4 Discussion .....................................................................................................111 7.5 References ....................................................................................................112 8. Non-use value ......................................................................................... 113 8.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................113 8.2 Methodology ................................................................................................113 8.3 Discussion .....................................................................................................114 8.4 References ....................................................................................................117 9. Carbon sequestration ............................................................................ 118 9.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................118 9.2 Methodology ................................................................................................118 9.3 Results ..........................................................................................................121 9.4 References ....................................................................................................124 Concluding remarks .......................................................................................... 125 Annex .................................................................................................................. 127 4 List of acronyms & abbreviations CE - Choice Experiment CVM - Contingent Valuation Method CES
Recommended publications
  • Quarterly Bulletin 2004
    QUARTERLY BULLETIN 2004 - II December 1, 2004 Issue no. 72 Correspondence related to this report should be addressed to the Economic Policy Department of the Centrale Bank van Aruba J.E. Irausquin Boulevard 8 P.O. Box 18 Telephone: (297) 5252-100 Telefax: (297) 5252-101 Website: www.cbaruba.org E-mail: [email protected] © 2004 De Centrale Bank van Aruba The information contained in this report may be published and copied for educational and noncommercial purposes, provided the source is acknowledged. ISSN: 0920-9905 CONTENTS I. Developments in the second quarter of 2004 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 The real sector 1 - Business Perception Index - Partial Economic Activity Index - Tourism - Construction - Utilities - Oil sector - Merchandise trade - Price developments 1.3 Money and credit 6 - Changes in the money supply - Interest rates 1.4 Nonmonetary financial institutions 7 - The balance sheet - The mortgage market 1.5 Government finance 9 - Financial operations - Outstanding debt 1.6 Balance of payments 11 - Overall outcome - Oil sector - Free-zone sector - Rest of the economy II. Notices and articles 2.1 A reflection of perseverance and resilience 17 Address by R. Henriquez, President of the Centrale Bank van Aruba, on the occasion of the official opening of Aruba Bank’s new head office, November 20, 2004 2.2 De betalingsbalans van Aruba in 2003 21 Een artikel van E.E. Matos-Pereira, econoom bij de afdeling Economisch Beleid 2.3 The economy of Aruba from a real sector perspective 32 An article by J.R. Ridderstaat, Economist at the Economic Policy Department III. Statistical annex I.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference on the Canadaian Shrimp Fishery
    ideen Size Top and Bottom Wedges 15th 1-3/4" 36th ]IL Headrope: 34'9" Polydacron Rope 3/8" Diameter Footrope: 35'7" Polyduron Rope 3/8" Diameter Chainrope: Same as Footrope Twine: Nylon Floats: Two 8" Diameter, Four 5" Diameter, Four Gill Net Floats Chain: 3/16" Dlameter 13 Links to 8" of Footrope Wood: Hard Pine Oak 1" Thick Chain Brackets 3/16" Diameter Galvanized Chain I2-^.. L- 1/2" Door Weigtt Dry: 70 Pounds 18 Linl^ 25 Links Headrope: 66' 18" Footrope: 74' ^ 16 Llnks 23 Links Floats: Twenty-two to twenty-six 8" diameter floats Rollers: 14" diametér rollers on bosom z-1 2" ^- J2-1/2" Mesh Size: 2" stretched mesh wings and bellies 1-7/8" stretched mesh extension and cod end I I II 2-1/2" 2-1/2•, FIG. 18 Semi-balloon trawl. F I G. 19 Smal I boat trawl. Mr. Bruce 273 BCF GLOUCESTER TRAWL SHRIMP HEADROPE FOOTROPE Wing 27' Wing 30.5' Wing 27' Wing 30.5' Bosom 14' Bosom 12' Total 68' Total 73' Mesh Size Top --4— tvedge Bottom T Selvedge 14' T 14' I 1 2' 21th 2' 21th + 36th 280bd Top and Bottom Twine: Polyethylene throughout except for nylon cod end Wings Floats: Twenty-four 8-inch diameter floats evenly spaced Rollers: 14-inch diameter bosom rollers, 9-inch diameter i wing rouera FIG. 20 4-seam trawl. 274 CONFERENCE ON THE CANADIAN SHRIMP FISHERY FIG. 21 Shrimp pot designed in Maine showing entrance slot on top, cement ballast, bait string and bridles, pounds of shrimp were landed in two months.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAMME 4 - 7 July 2017 • Boardwalk Convention Centre • Port Elizabeth • South Africa
    SAMssPORT ELIZABETH 2017 THE 16TH SOUTHERN AFRICAN MARINE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM PROGRAMME 4 - 7 July 2017 • www.samss2017.co.za Boardwalk Convention Centre • Port Elizabeth • South Africa Theme: Embracing the blue l Unlocking the Ocean’s economic potential whilst maintaining social and ecological resilience SAMSS is hosted by NMMU, CMR and supported by SANCOR WELCOME PLENARY SPEAKERS It is our pleasure to welcome all SAMSS 2017 participants on behalf of the ROBERT COSTANZA - The Australian National University - Australia Institute for Coastal and Marine Research at Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University and the city of Port Elizabeth. NMMU has a long tradition of marine COSTANZA has an H-index above 100 and >60 000 research and its institutional marine and maritime strategy is coming to citations. His area of specialisation is ecosystem goods fruition, which makes this an ideal time for us to host this triennial meeting. and services and ecological economics. Costanza’s Under the auspices of SANCOR, this is the second time we host SAMSS in PE and the transdisciplinary research integrates the study of theme ‘Embracing the blue – unlocking the ocean’s potential whilst maintaining social humans and nature to address research, policy, and and ecological resilience’ is highly topical and appropriate, aligning with Operation management issues. His work has focused on the Phakisa, which is the national approach to developing a blue economy. South Africa is interface between ecological and economic systems, at a cross roads and facing economic challenges. Economic growth and lifting people particularly at larger temporal and spatial scales, from out of poverty is a priority and those of us in the ‘marine’ community need to be part small watersheds to the global system.
    [Show full text]
  • FISHERIES RESEARCH REPORT NO. 173, 2008 Evaluation of The
    FISHERIES RESEARCH REPORT NO. 173, 2008 Evaluation of the effectiveness of reducing dolphin catches with pingers and exclusion grids in the Pilbara trawl fishery Final FRDC Report – Project 2004/068 P.C. Stephenson and S. Wells Australian Government Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Fisheries Research Division Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories PO Box 20 NORTH BEACH Western Australia 6920 Correct citation: Stephenson, P. C. and Wells, S. (2006). Evaluation of the effectiveness of reducing dolphin catches with pingers and exclusion grids in the Pilbara trawl fishery. Final report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation on Project No. 2004/068. Fisheries Research Report No. 173, Department of Fisheries, Western Australia, 44p. Published by Department of Fisheries, Western Australia. March 2008. ISSN: 1035 - 4549 ISBN: 1 877098 98 1 Enquiries: WA Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, PO Box 20, North Beach, WA 6920 Tel: +61 8 9203 0111 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.fish.wa.gov.au ABN: 55 689 797 771 Publications may be accessed through this website. © Fisheries Research and Development Corporation and Department of Fisheries, Western Australia 2007. This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. The Fisheries Research and Development Corporation plans, invests in and manages fisheries research and development throughout Australia. It is a statutory authority within the portfolio of the federal Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, jointly funded by the Australian Government and the fishing industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Gear Types Single Boat Midwater Otter Trawls
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations for a world without hunger Fisheries Division Fishing Gear Types Single Boat Midwater Otter Trawls Midwater Otter Trawls ISSCFG code: 03.21 – standard abbreviation: OTM Characteristics Overview A midwater otter trawl is a cone-shaped net which is towed in mid-water. It consists of a cone- shaped body, normally made of four panels, ending in a codend and the net has lateral wings extending forward from the opening. The horizontal opening is maintained by otter boards. Floats and/or sailkites on the headline and weights on the groundline provide for the vertical opening. Large modern midwater trawls are rigged in such a way that the weights in front of and along the groundline provide for the vertical opening of the trawl. The cable transmitting acoustic signal form the net sonde might also provide a lifting force that maximize the vertical trawl opening. To reduce the resistance of the gear and achieve a large opening, the front part of the trawls are usually made from very large rhombic or hexagonal meshes. The use of nearly parallel ropes instead of meshes in the front part is also a common design. The largest mesh sizes used so far are 128 m and, on modern large midwater trawls, approximately three quarters of the length of the trawl is made with mesh sizes above 400 mm. Accessory Equipment Hydrodynamic designed otter boards are used for midwater trawling. The fishing depth is usually controlled by means of a netsounder (netsonde) or depth recorders. As for other types of Trawls, catch sensors can be installed in the codend to give information about the amount of caught fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume III of This Document)
    4.1.3 Coastal Migratory Pelagics Description and Distribution (from CMP Am 15) The coastal migratory pelagics management unit includes cero (Scomberomous regalis), cobia (Rachycentron canadum), king mackerel (Scomberomous cavalla), Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) and little tunny (Euthynnus alleterattus). The mackerels and tuna in this management unit are often referred to as ―scombrids.‖ The family Scombridae includes tunas, mackerels and bonitos. They are among the most important commercial and sport fishes. The habitat of adults in the coastal pelagic management unit is the coastal waters out to the edge of the continental shelf in the Atlantic Ocean. Within the area, the occurrence of coastal migratory pelagic species is governed by temperature and salinity. All species are seldom found in water temperatures less than 20°C. Salinity preference varies, but these species generally prefer high salinity. The scombrids prefer high salinities, but less than 36 ppt. Salinity preference of little tunny and cobia is not well defined. The larval habitat of all species in the coastal pelagic management unit is the water column. Within the spawning area, eggs and larvae are concentrated in the surface waters. (from PH draft Mackerel Am. 18) King Mackerel King mackerel is a marine pelagic species that is found throughout the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea and along the western Atlantic from the Gulf of Maine to Brazil and from the shore to 200 meter depths. Adults are known to spawn in areas of low turbidity, with salinity and temperatures of approximately 30 ppt and 27°C, respectively. There are major spawning areas off Louisiana and Texas in the Gulf (McEachran and Finucane 1979); and off the Carolinas, Cape Canaveral, and Miami in the western Atlantic (Wollam 1970; Schekter 1971; Mayo 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fisheries Information Service
    MARINE FISHERIES ICAR INFORMATION SERVICE No. 141 JANUARY - FEBRUARY - MARCH 1996 ^«r'^"^W W^9?=fti^f9l' TI^ TECHNICAL AND f«r?rin: 3t^»T«ro^ EXTENSION SERIES ^^Icr Fr«f^ TTif^Fcr^ CENTRAL MARINE FISHERIES H^AUW ^FCIW RESEARCH INSTITUTE ^f?7, VflTfT COCHIN, INDIA INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COASTAL FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE MANAGEMENT IN THE EAST COAST OF INDIA* M. Devaraj, R. Paul Raj, E.Vlvekanandan, K. Balan, R. SathiadhasandM. Srinath Centred Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Cochin-682 014 I COASTAL FISHERIES MANAGEBIENT decade the marine fish production from the east The east coast of India has s shore line of 2,581 coast has Increased from 0.41 million tonnes km and has an EEZ area of 5,61,388 sq. km. in (1985) to 0.69 million tonnes (1994) {Fig.2). In the Bay of BengEil. The continental shelf is 1994, Tcunll Nadu and Pondicherry, Andhra 1,18,950 sq. km (Table I). The inshore area (upto Pradesh, Orlssa and West Bengal contributed 50 m depth), which forms 56% of the continental 59.9, 24.3, 6.9 and 8.9% respectively to the total shelf, is being intensively exploited using different marine fish production along the east coast. types of crafts and gears. During the past one TABLE 1. Geographical profile of the east coast of India Peirameters West Orissa Andhra Tamil Nadu Total Bengal Pradesh & Pondicherry Length of 1 157 480 974 970 2,581 coast (km) ' Area (xOOOha) upto 50m 994 1,707 1,661 2,326 6,688 51-200m 1,292 656 1,443 1,816 5,207 Total 2286 2363 3104 4142 11895 Growth of fishing activity i.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism and Development in the Senian Context: Does It Help Or Hurt SIDS? the Case of Aruba
    Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Management, May-June 2018, Vol. 6, No. 3, 100-108 doi: 10.17265/2328-2169/2018.06.002 D DAVID PUBLISHING Tourism and Development in the Senian Context: Does It Help or Hurt SIDS? The Case of Aruba Don Taylor University of Aruba, Oranjestad, Aruba Tourism is the lifeblood of many small island independent states and those that are categorized as small non-independent jurisdictions (SNIJs) such as Aruba. The question that this paper proposes to address is whether and how tourism helps or hinders island development. Research has been conducted on the economic effects of tourism in a global context; however, our approach is to look at its effect in one destination, Aruba, and to contextualize this research by situating it among other Caribbean islands. The rationale is that tourism is of more significance to the Caribbean in terms of economic dependence and tourism intensity. Because of the density of tourism in Aruba and its mono-economical development paradigm this makes for an ideal case study.1 Our methodology is based on an ontological review of the relationship between tourism and economic development utilizing a contextualized definition of development that fits within the philosophical position of Amartya Sen. In that context defined not just in terms of GDP growth but the enhanced social welfare of its citizens also in the Senian sense as distance from unfreedom. The concept of unfreedom for purposes of this paper is based on the extent to which there is an inertia to shift paradigms even if the existing paradigm enhances vulnerability, fragility and restricts opportunities to its citizenry.
    [Show full text]
  • Boat Conference Organized by the U.N
    Copiesavellshie from: SeeGrant Extension Program 6022 MoCartyHall Universityof Florida Gslnssvlila,F I.3281 1 PletW.SseOrant Cogsge le supportedhy awed of the Officeof SeeOrant, NationalOceania aad AtrnoepherieAdmlnletradon, U4. Depert- raentef Cetmmrm,grant nwahw NAESAA-~, underprovisions of the Natkmef8ee GrantCogege and ProgramsAot of 1888. This hdenaatlaals pehlldtedhy the SeeOrant Eatenekm Proipam wideh funatlons as ~ componentof the Florida CooperativeEatenslon Ssrvtse. JehuT. ggaeste,dom, In mmduetlngCoeperadve Extension work in Agriculture.Home Eoonomies, and ggerineSeieneee. State of Fkrride.U.S. gttpartnrsntef Agrharlture,UA Qspartmentof Commerse,and Soerdeof County Commiesloasm,cooperating. printed end dlstrlhutedIn ferdsemnseof the Acts of CengrWsof Stay 8 aadJune 1 1,1814. The Florida See Orant College h anEqual Employment Opportunity-Affirme- ~ eeAetkm employeraatharlmd m 'yrow4h~h, edaoatloaalkrformadon and other earvtaeeonly to individualsand InstNutlomthat ~ aoettenwithout Nacrd ta ress,eaktr, eea, or nationalorigin. I NTERNATIQNAL CONFERENCE DN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,AND OPERATIONOF COMMERCIAL F I SHING VESSELS Sponsored By: Florida Sea Grant College Program Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Southeast Section Florida Institute of Technology College of Science and Engineering: OceanEngineering Program Held At: Florida Institute of Technology Edi ted By: John C. Sainsbury Thomas M. Leahy Sea Grant Project No. IR/84-6 Grant No. NA 80AA-D-00038 Report Number 67 Florida Sea Grant College May 1985 Price: $10.00 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SPONSORS: Florida Sea Grant College Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Southeast Section Florida Institute of Technology, College of Engineering: OceanEngineering Program CONFERENCEGENERAL CHAIRMAN: Dr. JohnC. Sainsbury,Professor Chairman, Ocean Engineering Program, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida 32901, USA CDGRDI NATI NG COMMITTEE: Tom Col 't ins, Desco.
    [Show full text]
  • ATA Corporate Plan 2020.Pdf
    Corporate Plan & Budget 2020 Aruba Tourism Authority 2 Corporate Plan & Budget 2020 Aruba Tourism Authority 3 From the CEO Reading Guide The worldwide travel and tourism sector is still going Aspects which can adversely impact or enhance our strong, outpacing the growth of global GDP in 2018 for quality of life and the tourism experience we offer. CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 4 the eighth year in a row, according to research from the The A.T.A.’s aspiration towards 2025 The A.T.A.’s strategic, organizational World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC). Ultimately everything rises and falls on tourism. and our strategic direction for the and operational priorities will continue As part of our Multi-Annual Corporate Strategy 2018- period 2018-2021 are the starting to evolve in line with MACS. The Aruba tourism industry has been able to maintain a 2021 (MACS), as well as the Corporate Plan and Budget point for the development of our 2020 stable GDP for Aruba, and has – together with partners for 2020, the A.T.A. willcontinue to pursue a ‘High Value Corporate Plan & Budget. – ensured that the development was strong enough Low Impact’ Growth Model, taking internal and external to counter three significant moments of crises over influences as much as possible into account. the past 10 years: 1) the global financial crisis in 2008; CHAPTER 2 2) the closure of the oil refinery in 2009 and 3) the In this regard, as part of the envisioned growth model, As part of our Priority Areas for 2020, collapse of the Venezuelan market, which decreased by it is key to continue with the pursuit of innovative which form an integral part of our 86% in 2018 in comparison to 2015 when it was at its pathways for sustainable tourism development.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Economic Performance Report December 2011
    CARIBBEAN ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE REPORT DECEMBER 2011 CARIBBEAN CENTRE FOR MONEY AND FINANCE Established under the joint auspices of the Central Banks of the Caribbean Community and 1 | P a g e November 2011 The University of the West Indies CARIBBEAN ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE REPORT CARIBBEAN CENTRE FOR MONEY AND FINANCE The University of the West Indies St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago Phone: (868) 645-1174 , Fax: (868) 645-6017 E-Mail: [email protected] Website : www.ccmfuwi.org ii | P a g e November 2011 CARIBBEAN ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1 2.0 GLOBAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS ..................................................................... 4 3.0 REGIONAL ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE ................................................................ 13 3.1 ECONOMIC GROWTH .......................................................................................................... 13 3.2 INFLATION ........................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 LABOUR MARKETS .............................................................................................................. 18 3.4 FISCAL ACCOUNTS .............................................................................................................. 19 3.4.1 Current Fiscal Account ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dp-Wgoc-V-Crp4
    JNITED DP IATIONS Governing Council Distr. of the GENERAL United Nations Development Programme DP/CP/ARU/I 28 February 1986 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Thirty-third session June 1986, Geneva Item 5 (b) of the provisional agenda PROGRAMME PLANNING Country and intercountry programmes and projects FIRST COUNTRY PROGRAMME FOR ARUBA* Programme period Actual resources programmed 1987-1991 IPF for 1987-1991 364 000 Other resources programmed m Total 364 000 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. DEVELOPMENT TRENDS, STRATEGIES AND PRIORITIES . 1 - 18 i A. Current economic trends ......... 1 - 8 i B. National development strategies ...... 9 - 15 3 C. Technical co-operation priorities . 16 - 17 4 D. Aid co-ordination arrangements .... 18 5 II. THE COUNTRY PROGRAMME .......... 19 - 46 5 A. Assessment of current country programme . 19 - 28 5 B. New programme proposal .......... 29 - 45 7 C. Unprogrammed reserve .......... 46 9 Annex: Financial Summary *Detailed listings of projects and other related data prepared as part of the country programming exercise are available on request. These listings include: (a) ongoing projects; (b) proposed projects; (c) distribution resources by objective; (d) planned activities of operational funds and programmes under the authority of the Administrator; (e) distribution of new I country programme by sector. eee 86-05910 DP/CP/ARU/i English Page 2 I. NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES AND TECHNICAL CO-OPERATION PRIORITIES A. Current economic trends I. Aruba is the most westerly of the Leeward Islands in the Netherlands Antilles. It lies 67 kilometres west of Curagao and 24 kilometres north of Venezuela, covering an area of 181 square kilometres. The capital, Oranjestad, contains about one-third of the island’s 63,000 inhabitants.
    [Show full text]