CHICAGO JEWISH HISTORY Historical Personalities
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Race, Governmentality, and the De-Colonial Politics of the Original Rainbow Coalition of Chicago
University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2012-01-01 In The pirS it Of Liberation: Race, Governmentality, And The e-CD olonial Politics Of The Original Rainbow Coalition Of Chicago Antonio R. Lopez University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Lopez, Antonio R., "In The pS irit Of Liberation: Race, Governmentality, And The e-CD olonial Politics Of The Original Rainbow Coalition Of Chicago" (2012). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 2127. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/2127 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IN THE SPIRIT OF LIBERATION: RACE, GOVERNMENTALITY, AND THE DE-COLONIAL POLITICS OF THE ORIGINAL RAINBOW COALITION OF CHICAGO ANTONIO R. LOPEZ Department of History APPROVED: Yolanda Chávez-Leyva, Ph.D., Chair Ernesto Chávez, Ph.D. Maceo Dailey, Ph.D. John Márquez, Ph.D. Benjamin C. Flores, Ph.D. Interim Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Antonio R. López 2012 IN THE SPIRIT OF LIBERATION: RACE, GOVERMENTALITY, AND THE DE-COLONIAL POLITICS OF THE ORIGINAL RAINBOW COALITION OF CHICAGO by ANTONIO R. LOPEZ, B.A., M.A. DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO August 2012 Acknowledgements As with all accomplishments that require great expenditures of time, labor, and resources, the completion of this dissertation was assisted by many individuals and institutions. -
Former Governors of Illinois
FORMER GOVERNORS OF ILLINOIS Shadrach Bond (D-R*) — 1818-1822 Illinois’ first Governor was born in Maryland and moved to the North - west Territory in 1794 in present-day Monroe County. Bond helped organize the Illinois Territory in 1809, represented Illinois in Congress and was elected Governor without opposition in 1818. He was an advo- cate for a canal connecting Lake Michigan and the Illinois River, as well as for state education. A year after Bond became Gov ernor, the state capital moved from Kaskaskia to Vandalia. The first Illinois Constitution prohibited a Governor from serving two terms, so Bond did not seek reelection. Bond County was named in his honor. He is buried in Chester. (1773- 1832) Edward Coles (D-R*) — 1822-1826 The second Illinois Governor was born in Virginia and attended William and Mary College. Coles inherited a large plantation with slaves but did not support slavery so he moved to a free state. He served as private secretary under President Madison for six years, during which he worked with Thomas Jefferson to promote the eman- cipation of slaves. He settled in Edwardsville in 1818, where he helped free the slaves in the area. As Governor, Coles advocated the Illinois- Michigan Canal, prohibition of slavery and reorganization of the state’s judiciary. Coles County was named in his honor. He is buried in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (1786-1868) Ninian Edwards (D-R*) — 1826-1830 Before becoming Governor, Edwards was appointed the first Governor of the Illinois Territory by President Madison, serving from 1809 to 1818. Born in Maryland, he attended college in Pennsylvania, where he studied law, and then served in a variety of judgeships in Kentucky. -
The Chicago Housing Authority 10
the ,~ i J. Popkin,Victoria E. Gwiasda,Lynn M. Olson,[_) inis P. Rosenbaum,and LarryBuron FOREWORD BY REBECCA M. BLANK J The Hidden War 1£4/-7~ The Hidden War Crime and the Tragedy of Public Housing in Chicago SUSAN J. POPKIN VICTORIA E. GWIASDA LYNN M. OLSON DENNIS P. ROSENBAUM LARRY BURON .-- IPF~QRERYY ©f~ ~ation~l @iminal Justics Roi~o~c~ 8onii@ (t~¢jR8) Box 6000 Rockville, ~E) 20849o6000 RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PRESS New Brunswick, New Jersey, and London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The hidden war : crime and the tragedy of public housing in Chicago / Susan J. Popkin... let al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8135-2832-1 (cloth : alk. paper) -- ISBN 0-8135-2833-X (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Chicago Housing Authority. 2. Housing authorities--Illinois-- Chicago. 3. Public housing--Illinois--Chicago. I. Popkin, Susan J. HD7288.78.U52 C44 2000 363.5'85'0977311--dc21 99-056789 British Cataloging-in-Publication data for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2000 by Susan J. Popkin All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher. Please contact Rutgers University Press, 100 Joyce Kilmer Avenue, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8099. The only exception to this prohibition is "fair use" as defined by U.S. copyright law. Manufactured in the United States of America - Contents LIST OF PHOTOS, FIGURES, AND TABLES VII FOREWORD BY REBECCA M. -
Fiscal Year 2000 Appropriations
IL L I N O I S AP P R O P R I A TI O N S 20 0 0 VOLUME II Fiscal Yea r 20 0 0 July 1, 1999 June 30, 2000 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME II Page List of Appropriation Bills Approved: Senate Bills.......................................................................... v House Bills........................................................................... iv Text of Fiscal Year 2000 Appropriations: Other Agencies: Arts Council........................................................................ 1 Bureau of the Budget................................................................ 5 Capital Development Board........................................................... 6 Civil Service Commission............................................................ 69 Commerce Commission................................................................. 70 Comprehensive Health Insurance Board................................................ 72 Court of Claims..................................................................... 73 Deaf and Hard of Hearing Commission................................................. 97 Drycleaner Environmental Response Trust Fund Commission............................. 97 East St. Louis Financial Advisory Authority......................................... 97 Environmental Protection Agency..................................................... 98 Environmental Protection Trust Fund Commission...................................... 113 Guardianship and Advocacy Commission................................................ 114 Historic -
Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse. -
Academic Freedom and the Modern University
— — — — — — — — — AcAdemic Freedom And — — — — — — the modern University — — — — — — — — the experience oF the — — — — — — University oF chicA go — — — — — — — — — AcAdemic Freedom And the modern University the experience oF the University oF chicA go by john w. boyer 1 academic freedom introdUction his little book on academic freedom at the University of Chicago first appeared fourteen years ago, during a unique moment in our University’s history.1 Given the fundamental importance of freedom of speech to the scholarly mission T of American colleges and universities, I have decided to reissue the book for a new generation of students in the College, as well as for our alumni and parents. I hope it produces a deeper understanding of the challenges that the faculty of the University confronted over many decades in establishing Chicago’s national reputation as a particu- larly steadfast defender of the principle of academic freedom. Broadly understood, academic freedom is a principle that requires us to defend autonomy of thought and expression in our community, manifest in the rights of our students and faculty to speak, write, and teach freely. It is the foundation of the University’s mission to discover, improve, and disseminate knowledge. We do this by raising ideas in a climate of free and rigorous debate, where those ideas will be challenged and refined or discarded, but never stifled or intimidated from expres- sion in the first place. This principle has met regular challenges in our history from forces that have sought to influence our curriculum and research agendas in the name of security, political interests, or financial 1. John W. -
Bonds for Israel Dinner, Chicago, Illinois, May 5, 1968
/ }"- /1, ~ - f'J c_.a_yV.fO~ELEASE Monday M1' s May 6, 1968 OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT • REMARKS OF VICE PRESIDENT HUBERT H. HUMPHREY 20th Anniversary of Israel Celebration Chicago, Illinois May 5, 1968 I salute, with you, the first state in history that was 3500 years old on its 20th birthday. What we recognize tonight is the timeless tradition of mankind's ceaseless search -- no matter what the odds or how long and hard the course -- for freedom of the human spirit and for the dignity and the meaning -- of Man. What we recognize, beyond that, the greatest feat of human invention under divine inspiration and encouragement -- of the 20th or perhaps any other century: The miracle of Israel. It is commonplace to recognize the era we live in as a time of scientific miracles -- of lasers and masers, of atomic power and space-ships, of heart transplants and the creation of the molecule of synthetic life in the laboratory. It is harder to realize that this is equally the era of social and political change and achievement equal to the magnitude of technological advance. Israel is the evidence that Man as Citizen -- no less than Man as Scientist -- can invent his future. From the ghastly ashes of a continent gone crazy, a new nation grew up in the Middle East that has shown mankind that a small nation can -- in a moment of time -- become a great nation, an independent nation, a creative nation, and a strong nation -- no matter what the obstacles! And the way that was followed was freedom -- not the way of tyranny that takes shortcuts across the quicksand of false promise -- but the harder, yet firmer, course of freedom. -
Interview with Neil Hartigan # ISG-A-L-2010-012.01 Interview # 1: March 18, 2010 Interviewer: Mark Depue
Interview with Neil Hartigan # ISG-A-L-2010-012.01 Interview # 1: March 18, 2010 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 Note to the Reader: Readers of the oral history memoir should bear in mind that this is a transcript of the spoken word, and that the interviewer, interviewee and editor sought to preserve the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein. We leave these for the reader to judge. DePue: Today is Thursday, March 18, 2010. My name is Mark DePue; I’m the director of oral history at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, and it’s my pleasure today to be interviewing General Neil Hartigan. How are you this afternoon, General? Hartigan: (laughs) I’m fine, Mark. How are you? We can dispense with the general part, though. (laughs) DePue: Well, it’s all these titles. You’re one of these people who has several titles. But we’ll go from there. It is a lot of fun to be able to sit down and talk to you. -
I Like Ike the Presidential Election of 1952 1St Edition Ebook
I LIKE IKE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 1952 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Robert Greene | 9780700624058 | | | | | I Like Ike The Presidential Election of 1952 1st edition PDF Book I Like Ike: The Presidential Election of walks the reader carefully and richly back through all of that: Eisenhower versus Stevenson and the downfall of the delegate leaders for their respective nominations in a contest proving that the new Democratic majority was not invincible but one that Republicans would not replicate for a long time to come. Farrell Dobbs. Error rating book. In an election contest that was evidently deviant from, rather than diagnostic of, its predecessors and its successors. Russell, Averell Harriman and Earl Warren. Vincent Hallinan. Friend Reviews. On June 4, Eisenhower made his first political speech in his home town of Abilene, Kansas. Mike Monroney , President Truman and a small group of political insiders chose Sparkman, a conservative and segregationist from Alabama, for the nomination. Stevenson , he came from a distinguished family in Illinois and was well known as a gifted orator, intellectual, and political moderate. Adlai Stevenson for his part would have nothing to do with television at all and condemned Eisenhower's use of the medium, calling it "selling the presidency like cereal". North Dakota. While there are no shortage of books about Eisenhower or his years as president, nearly seven decades after his election there are only two histories about it. Incumbent Democratic President Harry S. Draft Eisenhower movements had emerged ahead of the election , mostly in the Democratic Party ; in July , Truman offered to run as Eisenhower's running mate on the Democratic ticket if Douglas MacArthur won the Republican nomination. -
Harry Byrd and the 1952 Presidential Election James R
Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Faculty Publications History 1978 Revolt in Virginia: Harry Byrd and the 1952 Presidential Election James R. Sweeney Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_fac_pubs Part of the American Politics Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Repository Citation Sweeney, James R., "Revolt in Virginia: Harry Byrd and the 1952 Presidential Election" (1978). History Faculty Publications. 5. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_fac_pubs/5 Original Publication Citation Sweeney, J.R. (1978). Revolt in Virginia: Harry Byrd and the 1952 presidential election. Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, 86(2), 180-195. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVOLT IN VIRGINIA Harry Byrd and the 1952 Presidential Election by JAMES R. SWEENEY* PRIOR to 1952 Virginians had voted for a Republican president only once in the twentieth century. In 1928 Herbert Hoover defeated Al Smith by 24,463 votes. Extraordinary circumstances produced that result. Smith's Catholicism and his opposition to Prohibition made him unacceptable to many Virginians, including the politically powerful Methodist Bishop James Cannon, Jr. By 1952 an entirely different political situation had developed in the Democratic Party, but Virginia Democrats were confronted with the same problem as in 1928, namely, whether or not to support a presidential candidate for whom they had a distinct lack of enthusiasm.' Since the incep- tion of the New Deal, the dominant wing of the Virginia Democratic Party, headed by Senator Harry F. -
UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Anxious Electorate: City Politics in Mid-1920s America Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/28z6d43t Author Fehr, Russell MacKenzie Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Anxious Electorate: City Politics in Mid-1920s America A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Russell MacKenzie Fehr June 2016 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Catherine Gudis, Chairperson Dr. Devra A. Weber Dr. Michael S. Alexander Dr. P. Martin Johnson Copyright by Russell MacKenzie Fehr 2016 The Dissertation of Russell MacKenzie Fehr is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements As is always the case when engaged in a massive project that has spanned an entire continent, there are more people to thank than I possibly could, including many whose names I will never know. The following, therefore, is just a partial consideration of those who deserve credit for this dissertation. The faculty of California State University, Sacramento, particularly Chloe Burke, Frank Garosi, Charles Postel, Brian Schoen, and Mona Siegel, encouraged me through their words and deeds to become a historian. Robert Dimit and Robin Nagle offered me further encouragement at New York University. Without the advice of Peter Wosh, I would have not been able to obtain a foothold as a scholar, and his continued support has been one of the things keeping me going throughout this project. At the University of California, Riverside, I have had the fortunate experience of having many scholars whom have been willing to offer their support over the last seven years. -
Dissertation Chapter 2 Sam Rosenfeld 1 Chapter 2: Democrats and The
Dissertation Chapter 2 Sam Rosenfeld Chapter 2: Democrats and the Politics of Principle Greensboro Daily News, July 8, 1959 The scholarly apostles of responsible party doctrine in the postwar years tended to be liberal Democrats who shared their ilk’s frustration with the party’s internal divisions and contradictions. When E.E. Schattschneider wrote to Adlai Stevenson after the 1952 election, he laid out a vision of a disciplined and coherent Democratic opposition that increasing numbers of liberal activists and voters found attractive.1 As his noncommittal reply suggested, Stevenson’s role in realizing this vision would be partial, somewhat unlikely, and at times even unwitting. An introspective patrician rather than a party warrior – and an ideological moderate to boot – Stevenson nonetheless served as a vessel for programmatic liberal energies in the 1950s. His two campaigns for president facilitated, on the one hand, the coalescence of a powerful cadre of policy intellectuals that helped to shape a liberal agenda during the Eisenhower era, and, on the 1 E.E. Schattschneider to Adlai E. Stevenson, November 9, 1952, Box 1, Folder 36, E.E. Schattschneider Papers, Olin Library, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT. 1 Dissertation Chapter 2 Sam Rosenfeld other hand, a major grassroots influx of new Democratic activists committed to party reform as well as substantive, issue-based politics. Both developments created constituencies that were open to making American party politics more national in scope, programmatic in orientation, and coherent in structure. The Democratic struggle for party responsibility was less visible in Stevenson’s actual campaigns than in nascent efforts to reform Congress, skirmishes in the national conventions, and, most vividly, the controversial tenure of Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman Paul Butler.