DOCSLIB.ORG

The 1806 Battle of Blaauwberg an Archaeological Perspective Willem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 1806 Battle of Blaauwberg an Archaeological Perspective Willem The 1806 Battle of Blaauwberg – an archaeological perspective by Willem Hutten submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the subject ARCHAEOLOGY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: Professor J.C.A. Boeyens CO-SUPERVISOR: Dr N.J. Swanepoel January 2019 DECLARATION Name: Willem Hutten Student number: 42586054 Degree: Master of Arts in the subject Archaeology I, Willem Hutten, declare that 'The 1806 Battle of Blaauwberg – an archaeological perspective' is my own work and that all the sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. I further declare that I have submitted the dissertation to originality checking software and that it falls within the accepted requirements of originality. I further declare that I have not previously submitted this work, or part of it, for examination at Unisa, for another qualification or at any other higher education institution. Signed this ___22nd___ day of _January_, 2019. Willem Hutten The 1806 Battle of Blaauwberg – an archaeological perspective ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research would not have been possible if it was not for the impetus provided by the FoBCA and Battle of Blaauwberg Interest Group. Roy Fuller-Gee, as the driving force behind the FoBCA, has contributed tremendously towards this research by arranging access to the site and providing the required hardware. Roy has also been the link between the City of Cape Town and Blaauwberg Nature Reserve. Ian van Oordt has spent many hours researching the battle and has given endless support, and shared valuable information and insights into the battle and associated events. Ian’s knowledge and experience of battle-related aspects have been invaluable. Without the metal detecting of Alan Wright, Robert Turvey, John Gravenor, Clayton Alison, Lance Turner, Steph Little, and many more metal detector volunteers, spending numerous hours persistently transecting the grids, this research would not have been possible. Their knowledge and experience have been a great help in conducting our surveys. The guidance, support and input provided by both Alan and Robert have, since the project’s inception, been key to its success. Garry Thomson and Joe Ribaudo have been involved with research into the battle for many years and have contributed greatly through their insight and hard work. Garry provided access to the Battle of Blaauwberg artefact collection retrieved from previous research. Many hours of discussion have also been of great help to obtain a better understanding of the era. Similarly, the continuous fieldwork by Francois van Lill, Anja Huisman and Marius Breytenbach made a massive contribution to the successful conclusion of the field surveys. I do appreciate the ongoing assistance of students from the University of Cape Town, and the many volunteers. The financial assistance of the UNISA bursary and NSFAS contributed to lighten the financial burden of the project. Catherine Damerell’s help with proofreading and editing is appreciated. I value the guidance by Prof. Jan Boeyens and Dr. Natalie Swanepoel during this project. I also extend my gratitude towards my wife, Louisa Hutten, who has been a pillar of strength while guiding the research expertly. Lastly, I want to thank my children, Kara, Mia and Ryno, for their regular assistance and for generously allowing me the time to complete the research. ABSTRACT British forces captured the Cape of Good Hope from the Batavian Government in 1806. The archaeological investigation into the Battle of Blaauwberg aims to identify the strategic use of the landscape by both sides focusing on specific geographic areas. Metal detector surveys and the mapping of archaeological material clarified the various battle positions within the reconstructed historical environment. Analysis of the artefacts provided insight into their use and the strategies followed by both armies. Altogether the evidence illuminated the use of the landscape and its influence on the course of the battle. This unique multi-pronged study of a South African battlefield and its material cultural record sheds new light on the 1806 battle, thereby complementing and refining prevailing historical interpretations. It explores methodological issues and approaches that are critical to the domain of battlefield archaeology in South Africa, where a large number of battle sites still await archaeological investigation. KEY WORDS Battlefield archaeology; Conflict archaeology; Geo-physical surveys; Metal detector surveys; 1806 Battle of Blaauwberg; General Jan Willem Janssens; General David Baird; Batavian Republic; Blaauwberg Hill; Melkbosstrand. OPSOMMING Britse magte het die Kaap die Goeie Hoop in 1806 van die Bataafse Regering verower. Die argeologiese ondersoek na die Slag van Blaauwberg is gerig op die identifikasie van die strategiese gebruik van die landskap deur beide kante met die fokus op spesifieke geografiese areas. Metaalverklikkeropnames en die kartering van argeologiese materiaal het die onderskeie gevegsposisies in die gerekonstrueerde geskiedkundige omgewing opgeklaar. ’n Ontleding van die artefakte het insig gebied in hul gebruik en die strategieë wat beide gevegsmagte gevolg het. In die geheel gesien, belig die getuienis die gebruik van die landskap en hoe dit die verloop van die geveg beïnvloed het. Hierdie unieke meervlakkige studie van ’n Suid-Afrikaanse slagveld en sy materiële kultuurrekord werp nuwe lig op die 1806-veldslag en sodoende word bestaande historiese interpretasies aangevul en verfyn. Dit verken metodologiese kwessies en benaderings wat kritiek is vir die domein van slagveldargeologie in Suid-Afrika waar ’n groot aantal gevegsterreine nog argeologies ondersoek moet word. ISISHWANKATHELO Imikhosi yaseBhritane yayihlutha iKoloni Yethemba eyayibizwa ngokuba yiCape of Good Hope, iyihlutha kurhulumente waseBatavia ngonyaka we-1806. Uphando lwezixhobo zakudala zexesha ledabi iBattle of Blaauwberg lujolise ekuqwalaseleni ubuchule bokusetyenziswa kobume belizwe ngala macala mabini, lugxininisa kwiindawo ezithile. Isifundo sembali senza uqikelelo lobunjani bedabi, kwaqhutywa iintlolo zimvo ezisebenzisa izixhobo zesinyithi nokuphengululwa kwezixhobo ezifumaneke kwizakhiwo zakudala nezacacisa iindawo ezahlukeneyo zedabi. Izixhobo zokusebenza ezafunyaniswayo zatyhila ulwazi lwendlela ezazisetyenziswa ngayo namacebo obulumko awayesetyenziswa yimikhosi yamacala omabini. Ubungqina bacacisa ukusetyenziswa kobume belizwe nefuthe lobo bume ekuqhubekeni kwedabi. Le ndlela ikhethekileyo, nenobuchule obuziindidi ezahlukeneyo, yokufunda indawo yedabi laseMzantsi Afrika, nengxelo yezinto zenkcubeko, inika ulwazi olutsha ngeli dabi lowe-1806, kwaye yongeza ikwacolisisa indlela yokutolika imbali yeli dabi. Kuphandwa imibandela yeendlela zokwenza namacebo abaluleke kakhulu kwicandelo lophando lwezixhobo zakudala zamadabi eMzantsi Afrika, apho iziza zamadabi eziliqela zisalinde ukuba kuphandwe ngazo. 1806 Battle of Blaauwberg – an archaeological perspective TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 KEY WORDS ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................... I TABLE OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................................. VIII CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. 1806 BATTLE OF BLAAUWBERG ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJECT .................................................... 1 1.2. RESEARCH QUESTION AND RESEARCH OBJECTIVE .................................................................... 5 1.3. RESEARCH SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................................................... 7 1.4. PROJECT LOCATION ........................................................................................................ 11 1.5. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................ 13 1.6. CHAPTER OUTLINE ......................................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 2. BATTLEFIELD ARCHAEOLOGY ................................................................................................... 16 2.1. A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTEXT OF THE RESEARCH WITHIN BATTLEFIELD ARCHAEOLOGY ... 16 2.2. EXAMPLES OF BATTLEFIELD ARCHAEOLOGY .......................................................................... 21 2.2.1. Battle of the Little Bighorn ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Battle of Blaauwberg
    N 1806 ENGLAND AND FRANCE WERE AT Saldanah Bay to occupy the port. WAR. Both had extensive interests in the East, and the DISCOVER Isafety of their trading fleets and overseas possessions 6th January: The British troops landed at Losperd's Bay, was of great importance. At this time the Cape was now Melkbosstrand. An old transport ship was beached to governed by the Batavian Republic (the name by which the act as a breakwater. One of the landing boats capsized in Netherlands was known from 1795 to 1806), an ally of the surf, drowning 36 Highlanders. Janssens did not France. There were fears of an attack by the British because oppose the landing. The Battle of the Cape's strategic position on the sea route Between Europe and the East. 7th January: The remainder of the British troops, armaments, horses and necessary provisions were landed th of 25 December 1805: After being chased by an English and preparations made for the advance to Cape Town. warship a French Privateer ran aground near Cape Point. Janssens moved his troops out of their camp at Rietvlei and I The French captain brought news to Lieutenant-General J by afternoon had taken up position at Bloubergsvlei farm, Blaauwberg W Janssens, Governor of the Cape, of a strong British fleet on the plains east of Blouberg Hill. His forces bestraddled on route to the Cape. the wagon trail to Cape Town which the advancing British troops would have to~use. British warships started 1" January: A Proclamation was issued for a general call- bombardment of the camp at Rietvlei not knowing that the up of all able-bodied men to defend the Cape.
    [Show full text]
  • Promerops 290.Cdr
    PO BOX 2113 CLAREINCH 7740 Website : www.capebirdclub.org.za TEL: 021 559 0726 E-mail : [email protected] THE CAPE BIRD CLUB IS THE WESTERN CAPE BRANCH OF BIRDLIFE SOUTH AFRICA Members requiring information should NOTICE TO note the following telephone numbers : CONTRIBUTORS Hon. President Peter Steyn 021 674 3332 Promerops, the magazine of the Cape Bird Club, is published four times a COMMITTEE MEMBERS: year. It is meant to be by all the Chairman Vernon Head 076 569 1389 members, for all the members. So it Vice-Chairman, Club is YOUR magazine to use. Many Meetings, Junior Club Heather Howell 021 788 1574 members submitted interesting items Treasurer Julian Hare 021 686 8437 for this issue ofPromerops and the Hon. Secretary Helen Fenwick 082 705 1536 editors convey their sincere thanks to Conservation Dave Whitelaw 021 671 3714 all concerned. Fundraising, Functions Anne Gray 021 713 1231 Courses Priscilla Beeton 021 789 0382 Contributions are invited from Camps Charles Saunders 021 797 5710 members in English or Afrikaans on birdwatching, bird sightings, bird New Member Mike Saunders 021 783 5230 observations, news, views, projects, New Member Mervyn Wetmore 021 683 1809 etc., particularly in the southwestern Cape. The abbreviations to use are: OTHER OFFICE BEARERS: Roberts’ Birds of Southern Africa (2005) Information Sylvia Ledgard 021 559 0726 - Roberts’ 7 Membership Secretary Joan Ackroyd 021 530 4435 Promerops Otto Schmidt 021 674 2381 Atlas of the Birds of the Promerops, CBC e-mail Jo Hobbs 021 981 1275 Southwestern Cape (Hockey et al. 1989) - SW Cape Bird Atlas.
    [Show full text]
  • Explosive Weapon Effectsweapon Overview Effects
    CHARACTERISATION OF EXPLOSIVE WEAPONS EXPLOSIVEEXPLOSIVE WEAPON EFFECTSWEAPON OVERVIEW EFFECTS FINAL REPORT ABOUT THE GICHD AND THE PROJECT The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) is an expert organisation working to reduce the impact of mines, cluster munitions and other explosive hazards, in close partnership with states, the UN and other human security actors. Based at the Maison de la paix in Geneva, the GICHD employs around 55 staff from over 15 countries with unique expertise and knowledge. Our work is made possible by core contributions, project funding and in-kind support from more than 20 governments and organisations. Motivated by its strategic goal to improve human security and equipped with subject expertise in explosive hazards, the GICHD launched a research project to characterise explosive weapons. The GICHD perceives the debate on explosive weapons in populated areas (EWIPA) as an important humanitarian issue. The aim of this research into explosive weapons characteristics and their immediate, destructive effects on humans and structures, is to help inform the ongoing discussions on EWIPA, intended to reduce harm to civilians. The intention of the research is not to discuss the moral, political or legal implications of using explosive weapon systems in populated areas, but to examine their characteristics, effects and use from a technical perspective. The research project started in January 2015 and was guided and advised by a group of 18 international experts dealing with weapons-related research and practitioners who address the implications of explosive weapons in the humanitarian, policy, advocacy and legal fields. This report and its annexes integrate the research efforts of the characterisation of explosive weapons (CEW) project in 2015-2016 and make reference to key information sources in this domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Pistols, Crime, and Public: Safety in Early America Clayton E. Cramer
    WLR44-4_OLSON-4-25-08 6/3/2008 3:46:03 PM PISTOLS, CRIME, AND PUBLIC: SAFETY IN EARLY AMERICA CLAYTON E. CRAMER1 & JOSEPH EDWARD OLSON2 There is a vigorous debate under way about the scope of the Second Amendment. What are the limits of that right? What “arms” does it protect? Does it protect an individual right to possess and perhaps to carry firearms? The District of Columbia, in its attempt to defend its 1976 gun control law, has argued that the widespread possession of handguns (“pistols”) represents an especially serious public safety hazard, and that even if arguendo, the Second Amendment protects an individual right, it would not extend to pistols, which the District of Columbia characterizes as “uniquely dangerous weapons” that present “unique dangers to innocent persons.”3 This paper examines what was likely the Framer’s original public meaning of the Bill of Rights provision that protects “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” with no apparent limitations concerning handguns. We do so by examining what the history of pistols in early America tells us about foreseeable technological developments. I. GUNS, ARMS, FIRE-ARMS, PISTOLS: SOME DEFINITIONS A few definitions are appropriate because there have been a few subtle changes in the meaning of some of the terms over the last two centuries. “Gun” had a more restricted meaning in the eighteenth century than it does today, referring in some contexts to privately owned cannon,4 but most often to what today we call long guns: 1. B.A. (History with Distinction), Sonoma State University; M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection Development Policy 2012-17
    COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY 2012-17 CONTENTS Definition of terms used in the policy 3 Introduction 5 An historical introduction to the collections 8 The Collections Archaeology 11 Applied and Decorative Arts 13 Ceramics 13 Glass 14 Objets d‘Art 14 Jewellery 15 Furniture 16 Plate 16 Uniforms, Clothing and Textiles 17 Flags 18 Coins, Medals and Heraldry 20 Coins and Medals 20 Ship Badges, Heraldry and Seal Casts 21 Ethnography, Relics and Antiquities 23 Polar Equipment 23 Relics and Antiquities 23 Ethnographic Objects 24 Tools and Ship Equipment 26 Tools and Equipment 26 Figureheads and Ship Carvings 27 Cartography 30 Atlases, Charts, Maps and Plans 30 Globes and Globe Gores 31 Fine Arts 33 Oil Paintings 33 Prints and Drawings 34 Portrait Miniatures 35 Sculpture 36 Science and Technology 40 Astronomical Instruments 40 Navigational Instruments and Oceanography 42 Horology 43 Weapons and Ordnance 46 Edged Weapons 46 Firearms 47 Ordnance 49 Photographs and Film 52 Historic Photographs 52 Film Archive 54 Ship Plans and Technical Records 57 1 Boats and Ship Models 60 Boats 60 Models 60 Ethnographic Models 61 Caird Library and Archive 63 Archive Collections 63 Printed Ephemera 65 Rare Books 66 Legal, ethical and institutional contexts to acquisition and disposal 69 1.1 Legal and Ethical Framework 69 1.2 Principles of Collecting 69 1.3 Criteria for Collecting 70 1.4 Acquisition Policy 70 1.5 Acquisitions not covered by the policy 73 1.6 Acquisition documentation 73 1.7 Acquisition decision-making process 73 1.8 Disposal Policy 75 1.9 Methods of disposal 77 1.10 Disposal documentation 79 1.11 Disposal decision-making process 79 1.12 Collections Development Committee 79 1.13 Reporting Structure 80 1.14 References 81 Appendix 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1
    Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 1 Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy The Project Gutenberg EBook of Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Artillery Through the Ages A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Author: Albert Manucy Release Date: January 30, 2007 [EBook #20483] Language: English Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 2 Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES *** Produced by Juliet Sutherland, Christine P. Travers and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Conrad L. Wirth, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. -- Price 35 cents (Cover) FRENCH 12-POUNDER FIELD GUN (1700-1750) ARTILLERY THROUGH THE AGES A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America Artillery Through the Ages, by Albert Manucy 3 by ALBERT MANUCY Historian Southeastern National Monuments Drawings by Author Technical Review by Harold L. Peterson National Park Service Interpretive Series History No. 3 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1949 (Reprint 1956) Many of the types of cannon described in this booklet may be seen in areas of the National Park System throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Jock Haswell, the British Army: a Concise History (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975), 9- 10
    CHAPTER 3 THE SOLDIERS: THE BRITISH FORCES The British forces that fought against the Jacobite forces during the rebellions were essentially two different and diametrically opposed armies. Although armed and initially trained the same, the two forces were very different. The first force to fight in the rebellions was the militia, and the second was made up of the Regulars in the British Standing Army. The former was trained yet untested and out of practice; while the latter was brimming with experienced veterans from continental warfare. This chapter will begin with a brief history of the standing army in Britain which will explain the existence of the militia; then it will explore the weapons and tactics of the British forces which fought against the Highland Charge. The British land forces had their beginnings in the eleventh century A.D. when the Normans brought the feudal system to England. Under this system, the Anglo-Saxon fyrd developed. The fyrd was a local military force composed of all free landowners between the ages of sixteen and sixty who served approximately two months per year and who could be called upon for defense at a moments notice. King Alfred, who reigned in southern England from 871 to 899, divided the country into military districts and required landowners who owned a specified amount of land to arm themselves.1 This was the beginning of the English militia, which was relied upon for the defense of the home front for the next eight centuries. The militia units were called upon during the threat of invasions, internal insurrections, and for service in Ireland.2 For the large-scale wars during the Middle Ages however, armies were raised for the campaigns or the duration of 1Jock Haswell, The British Army: A Concise History (London: Thames and Hudson, 1975), 9- 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Muslim Contribution to the Renaming Process
    Why Muslim contribution should be acknowledged in the renaming process. On the 2 October, 1805 a piece of land in the Bo-kaap, was granted by the “Raad der Gemeente” [the council at that time] as a cemetery for the Muslims of Cape Town. This official land grant, the first of its kind, was an expression of goodwill extended by the Batavian Republic following the granting of religious freedom on 25 July, 1804. This freedom was accompanied by two privileges: the right to build a mosque and the granting of this burial site. This action of the Batavian administration was an attempt to secure Muslim loyalty in the eventuality of a British invasion of the Cape. After 150 years of slavery and relentless religious persecution, Muslim gratitude of these privileges was expressed by the formation of two "Javaansche Artilleries". Under the command of Imam Frans of Bengal and a Frenchman J. Madlener, these artilleries were deployed at the Battle of Blaauwberg in 1806. They were well trained and fought so graciously that they earned the praise of their British adversaries. According to some historians, the Muslim artilleries could have won the battle had General Jansen not retreated. Because the Muslim fighters suffered heavy casualties; this altruism confirmed their readiness to sacrifice for the protection of this city. According to the South African Military History Society, the Muslims totalled 158 men; this included 54 gunners assisted by l04 auxiliaries, almost a third of the total Cape fighting force. These artillerymen were volunteer citizen-soldiers and members of the freed slaves of Indo- Malay origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing the Dutch and British Maritime Technologies During the Napoleonic Era (1792–1815)
    Technology and Empire: Comparing the Dutch and British Maritime Technologies during the Napoleonic Era (1792–1815) By Ivor Mollema December, 2015 Director of Thesis: Dr. Lynn Harris Major Department: History The two ships, Bato (1806) and Brunswick (1805) wrecked in Simons Bay, South Africa, provide an opportunity to compare British and Dutch maritime technologies during the Napoleonic Era (1792–1815). The former was a Dutch 74-gun ship of the line and the latter a British East Indiaman. Their remains reveal pertinent information about the maritime technologies available to each European power. Industrial capacity and advanced metal working played a significant role in ship construction initiatives of that period, while the dwindling timber supplies forced invention of new technologies. Imperial efforts during the Napoleonic Era relied on naval power. Maritime technologies dictated imperial strategy as ships were deployed to expand or maintain colonial empires. Naval theorists place the strategy into a wider spectrum and the analysis of the material culture complements further understanding of sea power. The study also recommends management options to preserve the archaeological sites for future study and to showcase for heritage tourism. TECHNOLOGY AND EMPIRE: Comparing Dutch and British Maritime Technologies During the Napoleonic Era (1792–1815) Title Page A Thesis Presented To The Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts, Program in Maritime Studies by Ivor Mollema December, 2015 © Ivor Mollema, 2015 Copyright Page TECHNOLOGY AND EMPIRE: Comparing Dutch and British Maritime Technologies During the Napoleonic Era (1792–1815) by Ivor Mollema Signature Page APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS: ________________________________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Appendix
    APPENDIX APPENDIX DYNASTIC LISTS, WITH GOVERNORS AND GOVERNORS-GENERAL Burma and Arakan: A. Rulers of Pagan before 1044 B. The Pagan dynasty, 1044-1287 C. Myinsaing and Pinya, 1298-1364 D. Sagaing, 1315-64 E. Ava, 1364-1555 F. The Toungoo dynasty, 1486-1752 G. The Alaungpaya or Konbaung dynasty, 1752- 1885 H. Mon rulers of Hanthawaddy (Pegu) I. Arakan Cambodia: A. Funan B. Chenla C. The Angkor monarchy D. The post-Angkor period Champa: A. Linyi B. Champa Indonesia and Malaya: A. Java, Pre-Muslim period B. Java, Muslim period C. Malacca D. Acheh (Achin) E. Governors-General of the Netherlands East Indies Tai Dynasties: A. Sukhot'ai B. Ayut'ia C. Bangkok D. Muong Swa E. Lang Chang F. Vien Chang (Vientiane) G. Luang Prabang 954 APPENDIX 955 Vietnam: A. The Hong-Bang, 2879-258 B.c. B. The Thuc, 257-208 B.C. C. The Trieu, 207-I I I B.C. D. The Earlier Li, A.D. 544-602 E. The Ngo, 939-54 F. The Dinh, 968-79 G. The Earlier Le, 980-I009 H. The Later Li, I009-I225 I. The Tran, 1225-I400 J. The Ho, I400-I407 K. The restored Tran, I407-I8 L. The Later Le, I4I8-I8o4 M. The Mac, I527-I677 N. The Trinh, I539-I787 0. The Tay-Son, I778-I8o2 P. The Nguyen Q. Governors and governors-general of French Indo­ China APPENDIX DYNASTIC LISTS BURMA AND ARAKAN A. RULERS OF PAGAN BEFORE IOH (According to the Burmese chronicles) dat~ of accusion 1. Pyusawti 167 2. Timinyi, son of I 242 3· Yimminpaik, son of 2 299 4· Paikthili, son of 3 .
    [Show full text]
  • Wear and Erosion in Large Caliber Gun Barrels
    UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED Wear and Erosion in Large Caliber Gun Barrels Richard G. Hasenbein Weapon Systems & Technology Directorate Armament Engineering & Technology Center U.S. Army Armament Research, Development & Engineering Center Mailing Address: Benét Laboratories Watervliet Arsenal Watervliet NY 12189-4050 [email protected] PREFACE “Wear and erosion” is one of several failure mechanisms that can cause large caliber Gun Barrels to be condemned and removed from service. This paper describes the phenomenon, its causes and effects, methods that are used to passively manage it, and steps that are taken to actively mitigate it. 1.0 GUN BARRELS – BACKGROUND A large caliber Cannon (Figure 1) is a pressure vessel whose primary function is to accurately fire projectiles at high velocities towards a target. Figure 1: Representative Large Caliber Cannon At its simplest, a Cannon consists of two major sub-assemblies: • “Gun Barrel”: a long, slender Tube that serves multiple functions such as safely containing high pressure combustion gases and providing a means for aiming/guiding the projectile in the intended direction; • “Breech”: an assembly that seals off the rear of the Gun Barrel during firing, but which can be quickly opened to allow loading of ammunition. It also contains a device used to initiate the combustion process. Paper presented at the RTO AVT Specialists’ Meeting on “The Control and Reduction of Wear in Military Platforms”, held in Williamsburg, USA, 7-9 June 2003, and published in RTO-MP-AVT-109. RTO-MP-AVT-109 16 - 1 UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED Wear and Erosion in Large Caliber Gun Barrels 1.1 GUN BARREL INTERNAL GEOMETRY Internally, a Gun Barrel often features three distinct regions (Figure 2): • “bore”: a long cylindrical hole machined to exacting tolerances for diameter, axial straightness, and surrounding wall thickness; • “combustion chamber”: a much shorter hole at the breech-end of the Gun Barrel that is coaxial with the bore and has a slightly larger diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadlands Armory
    Rifles Part I. Muzzles, Muskets & Minié Balls Loading a Flintlock Rifle For the first part of the nineteenth century, professional armies fought with the same smooth- bore flintlock muskets as their fathers and grandfathers. It generally takes an experienced soldier between twenty and thirty seconds to properly load a flintlock musket. First, the user has to unseal his pre-measured cartridge of gunpowder, which is usually contained in a paper or linen packet which is bitten open. (Because of the salty nature of gunpowder, this builds up a terrible thirst over the course of a battle, making potable water an essential part of any armed conflict.) Once the gunpowder is poured into the muzzle, the shooter inserts the lead ball, which is encased in a lubricated bit of cloth called “wadding.” Pulling the ramrod from its forestock slot, the shooter tamps the ball home, ensuring firm contact with the propellant charge. The ramrod is then returned to the forestock—unless a panicked soldier leaves it inside the barrel, to be fired along with the bullet! To fire the musket, the hammer is pulled to half-cock. A small pinch of gunpowder is placed in the “priming pan” located on the right side of the musket. The pan is closed to secure the primer, which brings a metal flange called the “frizzen” into striking position in front of the hammer. The hammer is fully cocked, the musket is aimed, and the trigger is pulled. The hammer dashes the flint against the frizzen, simultaneously creating a spark and pushing open the pan to expose the primer.
    [Show full text]