Serogroup X in Meningococcal Disease, Western Kenya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Serogroup X in Meningococcal Disease, Western Kenya LETTERS Table. Risk factors and outcome for 27 neutropenic cancer patients with bacteremia Serogroup X in due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) or drug-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii infection Patients with Patients with Meningococcal drug-susceptible MDR All patients, A. baumannii, A. baumannii, Disease, no. (%) no. (%)* no. (%)* Western Kenya Characteristic (N = 27) (n = 12, 44%) (n = 15, 56%) Risk for bacteremia To the Editor: Although >12 Central venous catheter 19 (70.4) 9 (75.0) 10 (66.7) different serogroups of Neisseria Acute leukemia 11 (40.7) 6 (50.0) 5 (33.3) meningitidis exist, most disease out- Previous prophylaxis with quinolones 14 (51.9) 8 (66.7) 6 (40.0) breaks across the African meningitis Previous therapeutic treatment epidemic belt are caused by serogroup with cephalosporins 15 (55.6) 8 (66.7) 7 (46.7) A and, less frequently, by serogroups Previous therapeutic treatment C and W135 (1). N. meningitidis se- with carbapenems 8 (29.6) 4 (33.3) 4 (26.7) rogroup X was fi rst described in the Outcome 1960s and has been found to cause a Septic shock 4 (14.8) 2 (16.7) 2 (13.3) Death 2 (7.4) 1 (8.3) 1 (6.7) few cases of invasive disease across *Insignificant difference between patients with drug-susceptible infection and those with MDR North America, Europe, and Africa infection (p<0.05 by univariate analysis). (2). In Africa, small serogroup X out- Septic shock developed in 4 Vladimir Krcmery* breaks have been described in Ghana (14.8%) of the 27 neutropenic patients and Erich Kalavsky† (9 cases over a 2-year period) and in with A. baumannii–associated bac- *St Elizabeth School of Health and Social Niger (134 cases between 1995 and teremia, and 2 (7.4%) of the 27 died Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia; and †Trna- 2000) (3,4). In 2006, however, 51% of (Table). However, we did not fi nd a va University, Trnava, Slovakia 1,139 confi rmed cases of meningococ- statistically signifi cant association cal meningitis in Niger were found to between death among patients with be caused by serogroup X (5). Before bacteremia caused by MDR A. bau- Reference the 2005-06 meningococcal epidemic season, no published reports had de- manni (1 death) compared with death 1. Sunenshine RH, Wright MO, Maragakis among those with bacteremia caused LL, Harris AD, Song X, Hebden J, et al. scribed serogroup X isolates in East by A. baumannii strains susceptible to Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infec- Africa. We report the involvement tion mortality rate and length of hospi- the carbapenems, ciprofl oxacin, and of N. meningitidis serogroup X in an talization. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13: outbreak of meningococcal disease in amikacin (1 death) (Table). This fi nd- 97–103. ing is similar to that described by Su- Western Kenya. nenshine et al. (1) in the general ICU Address for correspondence: Vladimir Krcmery, In January 2006, the Ministry of population and in neutropenic cancer St Elizabeth School of Health and Social Health of Kenya and Médecins sans patients with bacteremia; however, Sciences, Department of Oncology, Heydukova Frontières were notifi ed of a suspect- multivariate analysis was not conduct- 10, 812 50 Bratislava, Slovakia; email: vladimir. ed meningococcal disease outbreak in ed to control for severity of illness and [email protected] West Pokot District, bordering Ugan- coexisting illness. In conclusion, neu- da, in Western Kenya. On the basis of the initial outbreak investigation, the tropenic cancer patients with bactere- Letters mia due to MDR A. baumannii infec- Letters commenting on recent articles outbreak was assessed to have begun tion do not appear to be at increased as well as letters reporting cases, out- in late December 2005. Subsequent breaks, or original research are wel- risk for death compared with patients active surveillance, using the same come. Letters commenting on articles clinical case defi nition of sudden fever with bacteremia due to antimicrobial should contain no more than 300 drug–susceptible A. baumannii. words and 5 references; they are more onset with stiff neck, altered mental likely to be published if submitted status, or both, showed 74 suspected within 4 weeks of the original article’s cases through mid-March 2006, with This work was supported by grant publication. Letters reporting cases, a case-fatality rate of 20%. No cases 06/07/VEGA of the Ministry of Education outbreaks, or original research should were reported after March 2006. of Slovak Republic and approved by the contain no more than 800 words and 10 references. They may have one Over the course of the outbreak, Ethics Committee of St Elizabeth Cancer Figure or Table and should not be di- cerebrospinal fl uid samples were ob- Institute in Bratislava. vided into sections. All letters should tained from 18 patients. Due to low contain material not previously pub- population density, poor access to lished and include a word count. seminomadic populations, and the 944 Emerging Infectious Diseases • www.cdc.gov/eid • Vol. 13, No. 6, June 2007 LETTERS limited nature of the outbreak (rela- can assume that there was 1 menin- 2003 shows dominance of sequence type tively small numbers dispersed over gitis outbreak that started in eastern 5 (ST-5) and ST-11 complexes. J Clin Mi- crobiol. 2005;43:5129–35. a wide geographic region), obtaining Uganda and spread to Western Kenya. 2. Gagneux S, Wirth T, Hodgson A, Ehrhard specimens from untreated patients in Although initial laboratory testing in I, Morelli G, Kriz P, et al. Clonal group- West Pokot proved diffi cult. Three of Uganda suggested the presence of se- ings in serogroup X Neisseria meningiti- the 5 fi rst samples were found to show rogroup A, among 23 specimens sub- dis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:462–6. 3. Djibo S, Nicolas P, Alonso JM, Djibo A, gram-negative diplococci on staining, sequently sent to the Oslo laboratory, Couret D, Riou J, et al. Outbreaks of se- the next 2 were negative on Pastorex 11 were identifi ed as serogroup X by rogroup X meningococcal meningitis in rapid latex agglutination test (Bio-Rad PCR and 3 were serogroup W135 (6). Niger 1995–2000. Trop Med Int Health. Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) Therefore, the outbreaks in both Ke- 2003;8:1118–23. 4. Gagneux SP, Hodgson A, Smith T, Wirth (during the outbreak investigation), nya and Uganda involved multiple N. T, Ehrhard I, Morelli G, et al. Prospective and a subsequent 13 were sent to the meningitidis serogroups. In West Po- study of a serogroup X Neisseria men- African Medical and Research Foun- kot, Kenya, the Ministry of Health and ingitidis outbreak in northern Ghana. J dation (AMREF) laboratory in Nairo- Médecins sans Frontières conducted Infect Dis. 2002;185:618–26. 5. Boisier P, Nicolas P, Djibo S, Taha M-K, bi, Kenya, for culture and susceptibil- a vaccination campaign using the tri- Jeanne I, Maïnassara HB, et al. Menin- ity testing. From these 13 specimens, valent polysaccharide vaccine against gococcal meningitis: unprecedented in- 2 yielded a pure growth of N. menin- serogroups A, C, and W135. cidence of serogroup X–related cases in gitidis serogroup X, while no growth Before 2006, previous disease 2006 in Niger. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44: 657–63. was observed for the remaining 11 outbreaks caused by serogroup X had 6. Lewis R. Meningococcal meningitis sero- specimens. These 2 cultures were sub- not reached the magnitude of those group X: a new player in Ugandan epide- sequently confi rmed as serogroup X caused by serogroups A, C, or W135; miology. WHO Health Action in Crisis. by the World Health Organization Col- they tended to evolve independently 2006;1:6. 7. Centers for Disease Control. Epidemic laborating Centre for Meningococci in of the occurrence of both serogroups meningococcal disease—Kenya and Tan- Oslo, Norway. Multilocus sequence A and C and to be self-limited (3,4). zania: recommendations for travelers, typing and sequencing of the porA Although most of Kenya is not includ- 1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. and fetA genes as described (http:// ed in the African meningitis belt, large 1990;39:13–4. pubmlst.org/neisseria/), showed that epidemics of meningococcal disease Address for correspondence: Helen S. Cox, the infecting strain belonged to a new have been reported previously (7). In Burnet Institute for Medical Research and sequence type, ST-5403, and that it conclusion, we would like to highlight Public Health, PO Box 2284, Melbourne, was subtype P1.19,26 and FetA type the presence of N. meningitidis sero- Victoria 3001, Australia; email: hcox@burnet. F3-27. This sequence type is unrelated group X in East Africa, its potential edu.au to other serogroup X isolates from involvement in disease outbreaks, and Africa, including those from the lat- the diffi culties it may cause for labora- est serogroup X outbreak in Niger, but tory confi rmation and, consequently, it resembles a sequence type isolated for making an appropriate epidemic in the United States in the 1970s. In response. addition to the testing at AMREF and in the Oslo laboratory, the 13 samples Sadiki Materu,* Helen S. Cox,† were also analyzed by PCR at the US Petros Isaakidis,† Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3 in Bienvenu Baruani,† Cairo, Egypt. Overall, 5 of these 13 Thomas Ogaro,‡ specimens were positive for serogroup and Dominique A. Caugant§ X (including the 2 samples found to be *African Medical and Research Founda- serogroup X at AMREF and confi rmed tion, Nairobi, Kenya; †Médecins sans Fron- by PCR in Oslo) and 1 each was posi- tières–Spain, Nairobi, Kenya; Ministry of tive for serogroups C, W135, and Y. Health, Nairobi, Kenya; and §Norwegian At the same time as this outbreak Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway in Western Kenya, a meningococcal meningitis outbreak was being moni- References tored across the border in the Kar- amoja region of northeastern Ugan- 1.
Recommended publications
  • African Meningitis Belt
    WHO/EMC/BAC/98.3 Control of epidemic meningococcal disease. WHO practical guidelines. 2nd edition World Health Organization Emerging and other Communicable Diseases, Surveillance and Control This document has been downloaded from the WHO/EMC Web site. The original cover pages and lists of participants are not included. See http://www.who.int/emc for more information. © World Health Organization This document is not a formal publication of the World Health Organization (WHO), and all rights are reserved by the Organization. The document may, however, be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and translated, in part or in whole, but not for sale nor for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. The views expressed in documents by named authors are solely the responsibility of those authors. The mention of specific companies or specific manufacturers' products does no imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................... i PREFACE ..................................................................................... vii INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1 1. MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM ........................................................3 1.1 REVIEW OF EPIDEMICS SINCE THE 1970S .......................................................................................... 3 Geographical distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Meningococcal a Conjugate Vaccine Into the Routine Immunization Programme
    GUIDE TO INTRODUCING MENINGOCOCCAL A CONJUGATE VACCINE INTO THE ROUTINE IMMUNIZATION PROGRAMME GUIDE TO INTRODUCING MENINGOCOCCAL A CONJUGATE VACCINE INTO THE ROUTINE IMMUNIZATION PROGRAMME This publication was jointly developed by the WHO Regional Office for Africa and WHO headquarters. Guide to introducing meningococcal A conjugate vaccine into the routine immunization programme ISBN 978-92-4-151686-0 © World Health Organization 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- sa/3.0/igo). Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”. Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization. Suggested citation. Guide to introducing meningococcal A conjugate vaccine into the routine immunization programme.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meningitis Vaccine Project: Frequently Asked Questions
    The Meningitis Vaccine Project Frequently asked questions June 2011 The disease What is meningococcal disease? Meningococcal disease is an infection of the meninges, the thin lining that surrounds the brain and the spinal cord. It is usually caused by a virus or bacterium (meningococcus). It is transmitted through droplets of respiratory or throat secretions. Bacterial meningitis, such as meningococcal disease, can be very serious because it evolves rapidly and can kill in a few hours. Even with appropriate treatment, around 10 percent of patients die, and up to 20 percent of survivors have serious permanent health problems as a result of the disease (deafness, epilepsy, cerebral palsy, or mental retardation). What is the extent of meningococcal meningitis in Africa? Sub-Saharan Africa has been experiencing explosive and repeated meningococcal epidemics for more than a hundred years. Group A meningococcus is the main cause of meningitis epidemics and accounts for an estimated 80 to 85 percent of all cases. These deadly epidemics occur at intervals of 8–10 years in the 25 countries of the "meningitis belt," a strip of land that extends from Senegal in the west to Ethiopia in the east. Around 450 million people in this area are at risk of disease. More than one million cases of meningitis have been reported in Africa since 1988. In 1996–1997, one of the largest epidemic waves ever recorded in history swept across Africa, causing more than 250,000 cases and 25,000 deaths. The vaccine What is the expected public health impact of this new vaccine? If introduced in all 25 countries of the African meningitis belt, this vaccine is expected to eliminate the primary cause of epidemic meningitis, group A meningococcus, from the entire region, with an estimated 1 million cases of disease prevented and 150 000 young lives saved by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Meningococcal a Conjugate Vaccine Roll-Out in the African Meningitis Belt
    Meningococcal A conjugate vaccine roll-out in the African meningitis belt Summary update prepared by the Meningitis Vaccine Project & partners SAGE, October 2014 Background Over the last century sub-Saharan Africa has been plagued by repeated epidemics of meningococcal meningitis. Almost all of the major outbreaks have been caused by group A Neisseria meningitidis . Reactive immunizations with polysaccharide vaccines have been used for the last 30 years but have not succeeded in controlling the problem. After the disastrous 1996–1997 epidemic with more than 250,000 cases and 25,000 deaths, there arose renewed interest in developing a preventive strategy based on new meningococcal conjugate vaccines. In June 2001, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation provided core funding for the establishment of the Meningitis Vaccine Project (MVP), a partnership between PATH and the World Health Organization (WHO), with the goal of eliminating epidemic meningitis as a public health problem in sub-Saharan Africa through the development, testing, licensure, and widespread introduction of meningococcal conjugate vaccines. A monovalent group A meningococcal (MenA) conjugate vaccine, MenAfriVac, a registered trademark of the Serum Institute of India, was developed through the MVP. The vaccine was licensed, for use in individuals aged 1 to 29 years, in 2009 and prequalified by WHO in 2010. Comprehensive mass immunization campaigns of 1- to 29-year olds with a single dose of MenAfriVac have been a cornerstone of the MenA conjugate vaccine introduction plan. This strategy aims to strongly and immediately protect individuals directly and reduce bacterial carriage and transmission, and thereby rapidly reduce overall disease-related morbidity and mortality rates within the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Meningococcal Meningitis Outbreaks in Nigeria: a Need for An
    Available online at www.ijmrhs.com al R edic ese M a of rc l h a & n r H u e o a J l l t h International Journal of Medical Research & a n S ISSN No: 2319-5886 o c i t i Health Sciences, 2020, 9(6): 31-37 e a n n c r e e t s n I • • I J M R H S Seasonal Meningococcal Meningitis Outbreaks in Nigeria: A Need for an Accelerated Introduction of a Conjugated Meningococcal Vaccine into the National Routine Immunization Schedule Semeeh Akinwale Omoleke1 and Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi2,3* 1 World Health Organization, Kebbi State Field Office, Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria 2 Cephas Health Research Initiative Inc, Ibadan, Nigeria 3 Mental and Oral Health Development Organization Inc, Birnin Kebbi, Nigeria *Corresponding e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Epidemic meningococcal meningitis affects huge populations annually in sub-Saharan Africa with differentially higher death rates among children. Nigeria is one of the twenty-six countries that lie in ‘African meningitis belt’. This paper briefly describes the epidemiology of seasonal recurrent meningococcal meningitis, current efforts to address the epidemics, and then argues for an accelerated introduction of conjugated meningococcal vaccine into routine immunization in Nigeria. This paper also highlights the nature of the epidemics with its attendant impacts on the population; the weaknesses of the current strategies; the emergence of mixed pathogens; the challenges and potential opportunities associated with an introduction of routine vaccination against meningococcal meningitis. The quick introduction of the conjugated meningococcal vaccine into expanded program on immunization (EPI) schedule will mitigate the risk of future massive outbreaks and its attendant morbidity, mortality and larger societal cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Yaoundé Declaration
    YAOUNDE DECLARATION ON ELIMINATION OF MENINGOCOCCAL MENINGITIS TYPE A EPIDEMICS AS A PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM IN AFRICA _________________________________________________________________________ Sub-Saharan Africa is plagued by repeated meningitis epidemics concentrated in the “meningitis belt”, a vast region stretching from Senegal, on the west coast, to Somalia, on the east coast. The epidemics occur every year, with recurrent peaks every 8 to 12 years. The disease takes a heavy socioeconomic and human toll. More than a decade after a major meningitis epidemic in 1996 which resulted in more than 250 000 cases and 25 000 deaths, there is another threat to the countries of the African meningitis belt. An epidemiological survey of previous epidemics shows that Neisseria meningitis A is the main cause of meningococcal meningitis epidemics in Africa. About 500 million people living in countries of the meningitis belt are at risk of contracting meningococcus type A. Despite an appropriate management of cases, at least 10% of patients still die from the disease and nearly 20% recover with serious irreversible sequelae. For more than 20 years now, the control of meningitis epidemics is principally based on epidemiological surveillance and response mass immunization campaigns with meningococcal polysaccaharide vaccines which have shown their limits. The implementation of a new strategy to combat meningococcal meningitis epidemics in the African belt is necessary. It consists of organizing preventive mass campaigns and seeks to introduce a new meningococcal type A conjugate vaccine. It will help immunize, during the 2009 to 2015 period, about 250 million people aged 1 to 29 years, including 23 million children living in 25 African countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergence of Neisseria Meningitidis Serogroup W, Central African Republic, 2015–2016
    DISPATCHES Emergence of Neisseria meningitidis Serogroup W, Central African Republic, 2015–2016 Thierry Frank, Eva Hong, Jean-Robert Mbecko, after the 1996–1997 epidemic in Africa that killed nearly Jean-Pierre Lombart, Muhamed-Kheir Taha,1 250,000 persons, the introduction of the MenAfriVac vaccine Pierre-Alain Rubbo1 in 2010 contributed to dramatically reduced NmA cases in 26 countries of the meningitis belt by targeting roughly 65 mil- We analyzed data from the 2015 and 2016 meningitis epi- lion persons 1–29 years of age (WHO, http://www.who.int/ demic seasons in Central African Republic as part of the immunization/newsroom/menafrivac_20121114/en/). Conse- national disease surveillance. Of 80 tested specimens, 66 quently, serogroup replacement has been noted. For example, belonged to meningococcal serogroup W. Further analysis found that 97.7% of 44 isolates belonged to the hyperinva- in 2015, an epidemic with a novel strain of serogroup C was sive clonal complex sequence type 11. recorded in Niger and Nigeria for the first time since 1975 (WHO, http://www.who.int/wer/2015/wer9047.pdf?ua=1). Hyperinvasive N. meningitidis serogroup W (NmW) entral African Republic (CAR) is localized in the men- cases belonging to the clonal complex ST11 (NmW/cc11) Cingitis belt that spans from Senegal to Ethiopia in sub- have been reported worldwide since the Hajj 2000–linked Saharan Africa. The country experiences meningitis epi- outbreak (3–6). Moreover, NmW/cc11 cases have been re- demics every year. Eight health districts (Nana Mambéré, ported in the African meningitis belt at least since the late Ouham Pendé, Ouham, Nana Gribizi, Bamingui Bangoran, 1990s (7).
    [Show full text]
  • The Meningitis Vaccine Project Closure Conference Addis Ababa
    The Meningitis Vaccine Project Closure Conference Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: 22-25 February 2016 Meningitis surveillance in the African meningitis belt Dr André Bita, Clément Lingani, Olivier Ronveaux WHO ISTWA, HQ Outline 1. Background 2. Objectives of meningitis surveillance 3. Epidemiological situation of meningitis in Africa 4. Performance analysis of meningitis surveillance 5. Lessons learned 6. Summary 7. Way forward Annexes :Definition case; Operational thresholds; Performance indicators of surveillance 2 | Epidemic meningitis in Africa: Disease burden Reported cases 200,000 188,345 170,000 140,000 92,347 100,000 88,939 88,199 80,743 80,000 68,089 60,000 40,000 27,3011 20,000 0 Years 3 | Background -1 l Meningitis remains a major public health problem in Africa especially in the 26 countries of the meningitis belt. l The bacterial status changed since the introduction of MenAfriVac in Africa in 2010. Previously, NmA that was predominant. Thus, from 2010 to now, S.Pn, NmW, and NmC are predominant l The 3-pillar strategy to eliminate meningitis in Africa; Surveillance; case management; and vaccination l In order to improve the detection of meningitis case and assess the impact of introduction of MenAfriVac, Enhance surveillance (ES) and case based surveillance (CBS) have been introduced respectively in 2003 and 2010 4 | Background -2 l 2003 - 2015: introduction of ES in 19 countries of meningitis belt l 2010-2015: introduction of CBS; currently 13 countries are experiencing CBS l Initiated in 2010 in BFA, Mali, and Niger l 2014: Improvement of CBS in BFA, Mali, Niger, Togo, and (Ethiopia & Chad are in the process) through the MenAfriNet project conducted by CDC with the partnership of WHO, AMP & MoH countries concerned 5 | Background -3 Main differences between ES & CBS Elements ES CBS Lumbar puncture and CSF analysis for suspected meningitis cases >= 80% >= 90% Case investigation form filled for suspected meningitis cases >=80% 100% epidemiological data followed by lab data Routine reporting, management, and analysis of case-level data.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemic Meningococcal Meningitis, Cameroon
    LETTERS infections. Although we did not Dianna M. Blau, 7. Hajjeh RA, Relman D, Cieslak PR, Sofair conduct a case–control study, these Amy M. Denison, AN, Passaro D, Flood J, et al. Surveil- lance for unexplained deaths and critical fi ndings also support the results of Julu Bhatnagar, illnesses due to possibly infectious causes, other studies that previously reported Marlene DeLeon-Carnes, United States, 1995–1998. Emerg In- the demographic characteristics of Clifton Drew, fect Dis. 2002;8:145–53. doi:10.3201/ patients with pandemic infl uenza Christopher Paddock, eid0802.010165 8. Nolte KB, Lathrop SL, Nashelsky MB, infections and the risk factors for Wun-Ju Shieh, Sherif R. Zaki, Nine JS, Gallaher MM, Umland ET, et severe or fatal pandemic infl uenza and Infectious Diseases al. “Med-X”: a medical examiner sur- infections (3,4), especially with Pathology Branch Working veillance model for bioterrorism and in- respect to obesity (5). Group1 fectious disease mortality. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:718–25. doi:10.1016/j.humpath. Evaluation of tissues collected Author affi liation: Centers for Disease 2007.02.003 during autopsy from patients with Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA 9. Nolte KB, Fischer M, Reagan S, Lyn- a suspected infectious process can fi eld R. Guidelines to implement medi- DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1711.110429 provide an etiologic diagnosis that cal examiner/coroner-based surveillance for fatal infectious diseases and bioter- was not available from routine References rorism (“Med-X”). Am J Forensic Med premortem and postmortem testing. Pathol. 2010;31:308–12. doi:10.1097/ Other etiologic agents detected in 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Meningitis Epidemiology in 5 Countries in the Meningitis Belt of Sub-Saharan Africa, 2015–2017
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author J Infect Manuscript Author Dis. Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2020 October 31. Published in final edited form as: J Infect Dis. 2019 October 31; 220(Suppl 4): S165–S174. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiz358. Bacterial meningitis epidemiology in 5 countries in the meningitis belt of sub-Saharan Africa, 2015–2017 Heidi M. Soeters1, Alpha Oumar Diallo1, Brice W. Bicaba2, Goumbi Kadadé3, Assétou Y. Dembélé4, Mahamat A. Acyl5, Christelle Nikiema6, Adodo Yao Sadji6, Alain N. Poy7, Clement Lingani8, Haoua Tall9, Souleymane Sakandé9, Félix Tarbangdo10, Flavien Aké10, Sarah A. Mbaeyi1, Jennifer Moïsi11,a, Marietou F. Paye1, Yibayiri Osee Sanogo1, Jeni T. Vuong1, Xin Wang1, Olivier Ronveaux12, Ryan T. Novak1, MenAfriNet Consortium* 1National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA; 2Ministère de la Santé du Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso; 3Ministère de la Santé Publique du Niger, Niamey, Niger; 4Ministère de la Santé et de l’Hygiène Publique, Bamako, Mali; 5Ministère de la Santé Publique du Tchad, N’Djamena, Tchad; 6Ministère de la Santé et de la Protection Sociale du Togo, Lomé, Togo; 7World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo; 8World Health Organization, AFRO Intercountry Support Team for West Africa, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso; 9Agence de Médicine Préventive, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso; 10Davycas International, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso; 11Agence de Médicine Préventive, Paris, France; 12World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Abstract Background: The MenAfriNet Consortium supports strategic implementation of case-based meningitis surveillance in key high-risk countries of the African meningitis belt: Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Niger, and Togo.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Role of Duration of Vaccine Protection with Menafrivac: Simulating Alternative Vaccination Strategies
    microorganisms Article Understanding the Role of Duration of Vaccine Protection with MenAfriVac: Simulating Alternative Vaccination Strategies Andromachi Karachaliou Prasinou *, Andrew J. K. Conlan and Caroline L. Trotter Disease Dynamics Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK; [email protected] (A.J.K.C.); [email protected] (C.L.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: We previously developed a transmission dynamic model of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A (NmA) with the aim of forecasting the relative benefits of different immunisation strategies with MenAfriVac. Our findings suggested that the most effective strategy in maintaining disease control was the introduction of MenAfriVac into the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). This strategy is currently being followed by the countries of the meningitis belt. Since then, the persistence of vaccine-induced antibodies has been further studied and new data suggest that immune response is influenced by the age at vaccination. Here, we aim to investigate the influence of both the duration and age-specificity of vaccine-induced protection on our model predictions and explore how the optimal vaccination strategy may change in the long-term. We adapted our previous model and considered plausible alternative immunization strategies, including the addition of a booster dose to the current schedule, as well as the routine vaccination of school-aged children for a range of different assumptions regarding the duration of protection. To allow for a comparison between the different strategies, we use several metrics, including the median age of infection, the number of Citation: Karachaliou Prasinou, A.; people needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one case, the age distribution of cases for each strategy, Conlan, A.J.K.; Trotter, C.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Meningitis, from Practitioner to Prescriber Eugénie D’Alessandro
    Meningitis, From Practitioner to Prescriber Eugénie d’Alessandro To cite this version: Eugénie d’Alessandro. Meningitis, From Practitioner to Prescriber. Medical Innovations in Humani- tarian Situations The Work of Médecins Sans Frontières, 2009. hal-01419384 HAL Id: hal-01419384 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01419384 Submitted on 20 Dec 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Chapter 6 Meningitis From Practitioner to Prescriber Eugénie d'Alessandro eningococcal cerebrospinal meningitis is caused by a gram- ne gative dipl ococcu s, N eis s eria meningitidi.s, also known as the meningococcus. Although meningococci are present throughout the world, causing sporadic cases and small epidemics, rnenin- gococcal disease is a different entity in semi-arid sub-Saharan Aliica, where devastatine and unpredictable epidemics ()ccur. This phenomenonwas first described in the 1960s by Dr. Lapeys- sonnie, a French Ar-y general in the medical services. Covering a "band of terrain from the Atlantic to the Red Sea," the menin- gitis belt is an endemic-epidemic region. The epidemic risk is particularly high during the dry season. The severe conse- quences of these outbreaks in terms of morbidity and mortality make the disease a public health priority.
    [Show full text]