DOCSLIB.ORG

A Robust Sauropodomorph Specimen from the Upper Triassic of Argentina And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Robust Sauropodomorph Specimen from the Upper Triassic of Argentina And G Model PGEOLA-158; No. of Pages 10 Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association xxx (2011) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pgeola A robust sauropodomorph specimen from the Upper Triassic of Argentina and insights on the diversity of the Los Colorados Formation a,b, c,d Martin D. Ezcurra *, Cecilia Apaldetti a ´ Laboratorio de Anatomı´a Comparada y Evolucio´n de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Av. Angel Gallardo 470 (C1405DJR), Buenos Aires, Argentina b Seccio´n Paleontologı´a de Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Av. A´ngel Gallardo 470 (C1405DJR), Buenos Aires, Argentina c Instituto y Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Fı´sicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan, Argentina d CONICET, Argentina A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: The Late Triassic rocks document the first steps of the early dinosaur evolutionary radiation. Although Received 7 April 2011 the oldest dinosaurs were not abundant in their assemblages, sauropodomorphs achieved a wide Received in revised form 6 May 2011 taxonomic diversity and high abundance towards the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. In South America, this Accepted 7 May 2011 pattern is documented in the Ischigualasto-Villa Unio´ n Basin of northwestern Argentina, in which Available online xxx dinosaurs achieved a numerical dominance over other tetrapods during the deposition of the upper levels of the late Norian-Rhaetian Los Colorados Formation. In this contribution we enrich faunal list of Keywords: this assemblage with the description of a new medium-sized basal sauropod specimen with a very Dinosauria robust tibial morphology. This new specimen differs from the other known sauropodomorphs described Sauropodomorpha Sauropoda for the Los Colorados Formation and increases the alpha-diversity recorded for this group. A Triassic phylogenetic analysis recovered the new specimen at the base of Sauropoda and closely related to Argentina Lessemsaurus, Antetonitrus, and other basal sauropods. These results match with the high degree of robustness observed in the tibia of the specimen reported here, which closely approaches the morphology documented for other basal sauropods and departs from the morphospace occupied by non- sauropod sauropodomorphs. A two step pattern of tibia robustness increase is observed in the sauropodomorph phylogeny, a pattern that coincides and could be related with the acquisition of more habitual quadrupedal gait achieved by basal sauropods. ß 2011 The Geologists’ Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction (ca. 231–226 Mya; Martinez and Alcober, 2009; Ezcurra, 2010; Martinez et al., 2011). Towards the downfall of the Triassic Period, Sauropodomorpha is one of the three major groups of dinosaurs sauropodomorphs become more abundant in late Norian and and includes the largest known terrestrial vertebrates in the history Rhaetian assemblages around the world (Galton and Upchurch, of life. This group appears in the Upper Triassic fossil record (Langer 2004; Upchurch et al., 2004). Thus, a better knowledge of the Triassic et al., 1999; Martinez and Alcober, 2009; Ezcurra, 2010) and evolution of sauropodomorphs is an essential issue in order to reach disappeared at the end of the Cretaceous (Galton and Upchurch, a more comprehensive understanding of the complex macroevolu- 2004). During this time span, sauropodomorphs achieved a global tionary scheme in which the early radiation of Dinosauria took part distribution and composed the most common elements of verte- (Brusatte et al., 2008, 2010; Langer et al., 2010). brate faunas in several Jurassic and Cretaceous continental In South America, the Los Colorados Formation (late Norian- assemblages. Indeed, the dawn of sauropodomorph history indi- Rhaetian; Bonaparte, 1972; Arcucci et al., 2004; Martinez et al., cates that, although does not abundant, the group was already quite 2011) has the highest sauropodomorph diversity, including taxonomically diverse in the late Carnian–early Norian of NW Riojasaurus (Bonaparte, 1972; Bonaparte and Pumares, 1995), Argentina, one of the oldest known dinosaur-bearing assemblages Coloradisaurus (Bonaparte, 1978), Lessemsaurus (Bonaparte, 1999; Pol and Powell, 2007), and an undescribed basal sauropodomorph (Martinez et al., 2004). These basal sauropodomorphs were found in the upper levels of the Los Colorados Formation, which * Corresponding author at: Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino represents a sequence of fluvial deposits with sand channels of Rivadavia’’, Laboratorio de Anatomı´a Comparada y Evolucio´ n de los Vertebrados, ´ moderate to high sinuosity and well-developed flood plains Av. Angel Gallardo 470, C1405DJR Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail address: [email protected] (M.D. Ezcurra). (Caselli et al., 2001). The presence of thick alluvian plain deposits, 0016-7878/$ – see front matter ß 2011 The Geologists’ Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.pgeola.2011.05.002 Please cite this article in press as: Ezcurra, M.D., Apaldetti, C., A robust sauropodomorph specimen from the Upper Triassic of Argentina and insights on the diversity of the Los Colorados Formation. Proc. Geol. Assoc. (2011), doi:10.1016/j.pgeola.2011.05.002 G Model PGEOLA-158; No. of Pages 10 2 M.D. Ezcurra, C. Apaldetti / Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association xxx (2011) xxx–xxx Table 1 Selected measurements (in mm) of the available bones of PULR 136. All the values are the maximum measurables. Error for vertebral measurements: 0.02 mm; error for tibial measurements 0.5 mm. Proximal caudal centrum Length 82.04 Anterior articular facet height 72.70 Anterior articular facet width 69.10 Posterior articular facet height 66.30 Posterior articular facet width 59.82 Mid-caudal centrum Length 76.88 a Anterior articular facet height 48.44 a Anterior articular facet width 53.22 Posterior articular facet height 54.56 a Posterior articular facet width 52.06 Left tibia Length 405 Anteroposterior depth of proximal end 200 Transverse width of proximal end 112 Anteroposterior depth at mid-shaft 75 Transverse width at mid-shaft 64 Anteroposterior depth of distal end 129 Transverse width of distal end 119 a Incomplete. Massopoda Yates, 2007 sensu Yates, 2007 Sauropoda Marsh, 1878 sensu Yates, 2007 Gen. et sp. indet. 2.1. Material Fig. 1. Simplified geologic map of the Agua de la Pen˜a Group showing the outcrops of the Ischigualasto (light grey) and Los Colorados Formations (dark grey). A PULR 136, a proximal caudal vertebral centrum, a middle caudal satellite image shows a close-up of the area in which PULR 136 was collected and vertebral centrum, a fragment of dorsal rib, and a complete left the white bone silhouette denotes the exact locality (Quebrada del Viento). The line tibia (Table 1 and Fig. 2). All these elements were discovered in the satellite image depicts the limit between the San Juan and La Rioja provinces closely associated with each other, are of matching size, and and the scale is 1 km. The geologic map was modified from Caselli et al. (2001). present a consistent morphology with that of a basal sauropod. Accordingly, we consider that these postcranial bones pertain to a representing episodic flows and high precipitation, suggest a single individual. humid or sub-humid environmental condition during the deposi- tion of the unit (Caselli et al., 2001; Arcucci et al., 2004). Here we 2.2. Locality and horizon describe from the upper levels of the Los Colorados Formation (Fig. 1) a new sauropodomorph specimen that has a distinct 0 00 0 00 Quebrada del Viento (29851 39 S, 68805 48 W), La Rioja morphology from that of previously known sauropodomorph taxa Province, NW Argentina (Fig. 1). Upper levels of the Los Colorados of this unit. Formation (late Norian-Rhaetian, Late Triassic; Martinez et al., Institutional abbreviations. BSP, Bayerische Staatssammlung fu¨ r 2011). Pala¨ontologie und Historische Geologie, Munich, Germany; ISI, Geological Studies Unit of the Indian Statistical Institute, Calcutta, 3. Description India; JM, Jura-Museum in Eichsta¨tt, Bayern, Germany; MB, Humboldt Museum fu¨ r Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany; MCP, Museo The middle caudal vertebral centrum of PULR 136 is weathered, de Ciencias e Tecnologı´a, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MHNM, Muse´um but the proximal caudal centrum, left tibia, and rib fragment are d’Histoire naturelle, Marrakech; NHMUK, Natural History Museum well-preserved (Fig. 2). The length of the tibia closely approaches of United Kingdom, London, UK; NM, National Museum, Bloemfon- to that of the holotype of the riojasaurid Eucnemesaurus fortis (TM tein, Free State, South Africa; OUMNH, Oxford University Museum of 119: body length of ca. 10 m; van Heerden, 1979) and is slightly Natural History, Oxford, England; PULR, Paleontologı´a, Universidad larger than the holotype of the basal sauropod Blikanasaurus (SAM Nacional de La Rioja, La Rioja, Argentina; PVL, Fundacio´ n ‘‘Miguel K403: body length of ca. 10 m; van Heerden, 1979; Galton and van Lillo’’, San Miguel de Tucuma´n, Argentina; PVSJ, Museo de Ciencias Heerden, 1985) (Table 2). Accordingly, PULR 136 would have been Naturales, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan Argentina; an animal of a total body length of approximately 10 m. QG, Zimbabwe Natural History Museum, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe; SAM; South African Museum, South Africa; SMNS, Staatliches 3.1. Caudal vertebrae Museum fu¨ r Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Germany; TM, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria; South Africa; YPM, Yale University, Peabody The centra of a posterior proximal and an anterior mid-caudal Museum of Natural History, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. vertebra are preserved (Fig. 2G–L, Table 1). The dorsolateral borders are damaged and, consequently, we cannot assess if the 2. Systematic palaeontology neurocentral sutures were closed or still open. The proximal caudal centrum is amphicoelous and approximately 1.13 times longer Dinosauria Owen, 1842 sensu Padian and May, 1993 than the height of its anterior articular facet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Braincase, Brain and Palaeobiology of the Basal Sauropodomorph Dinosaur Thecodontosaurus Antiquus
    applyparastyle “fig//caption/p[1]” parastyle “FigCapt” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2020, XX, 1–22. With 10 figures. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/advance-article/doi/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa157/6032720 by University of Bristol Library user on 14 December 2020 The braincase, brain and palaeobiology of the basal sauropodomorph dinosaur Thecodontosaurus antiquus ANTONIO BALLELL1,*, J. LOGAN KING1, JAMES M. NEENAN2, EMILY J. RAYFIELD1 and MICHAEL J. BENTON1 1School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK 2Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PW, UK Received 27 May 2020; revised 15 October 2020; accepted for publication 26 October 2020 Sauropodomorph dinosaurs underwent drastic changes in their anatomy and ecology throughout their evolution. The Late Triassic Thecodontosaurus antiquus occupies a basal position within Sauropodomorpha, being a key taxon for documenting how those morphofunctional transitions occurred. Here, we redescribe the braincase osteology and reconstruct the neuroanatomy of Thecodontosaurus, based on computed tomography data. The braincase of Thecodontosaurus shares the presence of medial basioccipital components of the basal tubera and a U-shaped basioccipital–parabasisphenoid suture with other basal sauropodomorphs and shows a distinct combination of characters: a straight outline of the braincase floor, an undivided metotic foramen, an unossified gap, large floccular fossae, basipterygoid processes perpendicular to the cultriform process in lateral view and a rhomboid foramen magnum. We reinterpret these braincase features in the light of new discoveries in dinosaur anatomy. Our endocranial reconstruction reveals important aspects of the palaeobiology of Thecodontosaurus, supporting a bipedal stance and cursorial habits, with adaptations to retain a steady head and gaze while moving.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Continental Late Triassic Tetrapod Biochronology. I. the Type Locality of Saturnalia Tupiniquim and the Faunal Succession in South Brazil
    Journal of South American Earth Sciences 19 (2005) 205–218 www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames Studies on continental Late Triassic tetrapod biochronology. I. The type locality of Saturnalia tupiniquim and the faunal succession in south Brazil Max Cardoso Langer* Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de Sa˜o Paulo (USP), Av. Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901 Ribeira˜o Preto, SP, Brazil Received 1 November 2003; accepted 1 January 2005 Abstract Late Triassic deposits of the Parana´ Basin, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, encompass a single third-order, tetrapod-bearing sedimentary sequence that includes parts of the Alemoa Member (Santa Maria Formation) and the Caturrita Formation. A rich, diverse succession of terrestrial tetrapod communities is recorded in these sediments, which can be divided into at least three faunal associations. The stem- sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim was collected in the locality known as ‘Waldsanga’ near the city of Santa Maria. In that area, the deposits of the Alemoa Member yield the ‘Alemoa local fauna,’ which typifies the first association; includes the rhynchosaur Hyperodapedon, aetosaurs, and basal dinosaurs; and is coeval with the lower fauna of the Ischigualasto Formation, Bermejo Basin, NW Argentina. The second association is recorded in deposits of both the Alemoa Member and the Caturrita Formation, characterized by the rhynchosaur ‘Scaphonyx’ sulcognathus and the cynodont Exaeretodon, and correlated with the upper fauna of the Ischigualasto Formation. Various isolated outcrops of the Caturrita Formation yield tetrapod fossils that correspond to post-Ischigualastian faunas but might not belong to a single faunal association. The record of the dicynodont Jachaleria suggests correlations with the lower part of the Los Colorados Formation, NW Argentina, whereas remains of derived tritheledontid cynodonts indicate younger ages.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Early Evolution of Dinosaurs
    Biol. Rev. (2010), 85, pp. 55–110. 55 doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00094.x The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs Max C. Langer1∗,MartinD.Ezcurra2, Jonathas S. Bittencourt1 and Fernando E. Novas2,3 1Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP, Universidade de S˜ao Paulo; Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeir˜ao Preto-SP, Brazil 2Laboratorio de Anatomia Comparada y Evoluci´on de los Vertebrados, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘‘Bernardino Rivadavia’’, Avda. Angel Gallardo 470, Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina 3CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y T´ecnicas); Avda. Rivadavia 1917 - Cdad. de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Received 28 November 2008; revised 09 July 2009; accepted 14 July 2009) ABSTRACT The oldest unequivocal records of Dinosauria were unearthed from Late Triassic rocks (approximately 230 Ma) accumulated over extensional rift basins in southwestern Pangea. The better known of these are Herrerasaurus ischigualastensis, Pisanosaurus mertii, Eoraptor lunensis,andPanphagia protos from the Ischigualasto Formation, Argentina, and Staurikosaurus pricei and Saturnalia tupiniquim from the Santa Maria Formation, Brazil. No uncontroversial dinosaur body fossils are known from older strata, but the Middle Triassic origin of the lineage may be inferred from both the footprint record and its sister-group relation to Ladinian basal dinosauromorphs. These include the typical Marasuchus lilloensis, more basal forms such as Lagerpeton and Dromomeron, as well as silesaurids: a possibly monophyletic group composed of Mid-Late Triassic forms that may represent immediate sister taxa to dinosaurs. The first phylogenetic definition to fit the current understanding of Dinosauria as a node-based taxon solely composed of mutually exclusive Saurischia and Ornithischia was given as ‘‘all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of birds and Triceratops’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Dental Enamel Wrinkling to Define Sauropod Tooth Morphotypes from the Cañadón Asfalto Formation, Patagonia, Argentina
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Using Dental Enamel Wrinkling to Define Sauropod Tooth Morphotypes from the Cañadón Asfalto Formation, Patagonia, Argentina Femke M. Holwerda1,2,3*, Diego Pol4,5, Oliver W. M. Rauhut1,3 1 Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns (SNSB), Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, München, Germany, 2 GeoBioTec, Departamento de Ciências da Terra, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia (FCT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal, 3 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and GeoBioCenter, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München, Germany, 4 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 5 Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio, Trelew, Argentina * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS The early Middle Jurassic is regarded as the period when sauropods diversified and be- Citation: Holwerda FM, Pol D, Rauhut OWM (2015) came major components of the terrestrial ecosystems. Not many sites yield sauropod mate- Using Dental Enamel Wrinkling to Define Sauropod Tooth Morphotypes from the Cañadón Asfalto rial of this time; however, both cranial and postcranial material of eusauropods have been Formation, Patagonia, Argentina. PLoS ONE 10(2): found in the Cañadón Asfalto Formation (latest Early Jurassic–early Middle Jurassic) in e0118100. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118100 Central Patagonia (Argentina), which may help to shed light on the early evolution of Academic Editor: Peter Dodson, University of eusauropods. These eusauropod remains include teeth associated with cranial and man- Pennsylvania, UNITED STATES dibular material as well as isolated teeth found at different localities. In this study, an assem- Received: September 1, 2014 blage of sauropod teeth from the Cañadón Asfalto Formation found in four different Accepted: January 7, 2015 localities in the area of Cerro Condor (Chubut, Argentina) is used as a mean of assessing sauropod species diversity at these sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sauropodomorph Biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of Southern Africa: Tracking the Evolution of Sauropodomorpha Across the Triassic–Jurassic Boundary
    Editors' choice The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary BLAIR W. MCPHEE, EMESE M. BORDY, LARA SCISCIO, and JONAH N. CHOINIERE McPhee, B.W., Bordy, E.M., Sciscio, L., and Choiniere, J.N. 2017. The sauropodomorph biostratigraphy of the Elliot Formation of southern Africa: Tracking the evolution of Sauropodomorpha across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62 (3): 441–465. The latest Triassic is notable for coinciding with the dramatic decline of many previously dominant groups, followed by the rapid radiation of Dinosauria in the Early Jurassic. Among the most common terrestrial vertebrates from this time, sauropodomorph dinosaurs provide an important insight into the changing dynamics of the biota across the Triassic–Jurassic boundary. The Elliot Formation of South Africa and Lesotho preserves the richest assemblage of sauropodomorphs known from this age, and is a key index assemblage for biostratigraphic correlations with other simi- larly-aged global terrestrial deposits. Past assessments of Elliot Formation biostratigraphy were hampered by an overly simplistic biozonation scheme which divided it into a lower “Euskelosaurus” Range Zone and an upper Massospondylus Range Zone. Here we revise the zonation of the Elliot Formation by: (i) synthesizing the last three decades’ worth of fossil discoveries, taxonomic revision, and lithostratigraphic investigation; and (ii) systematically reappraising the strati- graphic provenance of important fossil locations. We then use our revised stratigraphic information in conjunction with phylogenetic character data to assess morphological disparity between Late Triassic and Early Jurassic sauropodomorph taxa. Our results demonstrate that the Early Jurassic upper Elliot Formation is considerably more taxonomically and morphologically diverse than previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • 71St Annual Meeting Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Paris Las Vegas Las Vegas, Nevada, USA November 2 – 5, 2011 SESSION CONCURRENT SESSION CONCURRENT
    ISSN 1937-2809 online Journal of Supplement to the November 2011 Vertebrate Paleontology Vertebrate Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Society of Vertebrate 71st Annual Meeting Paleontology Society of Vertebrate Las Vegas Paris Nevada, USA Las Vegas, November 2 – 5, 2011 Program and Abstracts Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 71st Annual Meeting Program and Abstracts COMMITTEE MEETING ROOM POSTER SESSION/ CONCURRENT CONCURRENT SESSION EXHIBITS SESSION COMMITTEE MEETING ROOMS AUCTION EVENT REGISTRATION, CONCURRENT MERCHANDISE SESSION LOUNGE, EDUCATION & OUTREACH SPEAKER READY COMMITTEE MEETING POSTER SESSION ROOM ROOM SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS SEVENTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL LAS VEGAS, NV, USA NOVEMBER 2–5, 2011 HOST COMMITTEE Stephen Rowland, Co-Chair; Aubrey Bonde, Co-Chair; Joshua Bonde; David Elliott; Lee Hall; Jerry Harris; Andrew Milner; Eric Roberts EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Philip Currie, President; Blaire Van Valkenburgh, Past President; Catherine Forster, Vice President; Christopher Bell, Secretary; Ted Vlamis, Treasurer; Julia Clarke, Member at Large; Kristina Curry Rogers, Member at Large; Lars Werdelin, Member at Large SYMPOSIUM CONVENORS Roger B.J. Benson, Richard J. Butler, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Hans C.E. Larsson, Mark A. Loewen, Philip D. Mannion, Jim I. Mead, Eric M. Roberts, Scott D. Sampson, Eric D. Scott, Kathleen Springer PROGRAM COMMITTEE Jonathan Bloch, Co-Chair; Anjali Goswami, Co-Chair; Jason Anderson; Paul Barrett; Brian Beatty; Kerin Claeson; Kristina Curry Rogers; Ted Daeschler; David Evans; David Fox; Nadia B. Fröbisch; Christian Kammerer; Johannes Müller; Emily Rayfield; William Sanders; Bruce Shockey; Mary Silcox; Michelle Stocker; Rebecca Terry November 2011—PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS 1 Members and Friends of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, The Host Committee cordially welcomes you to the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Las Vegas.
    [Show full text]
  • Xjiiie'icanj/Useum
    XJiiie'ican1ox4tatreJ/useum PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK 24, N.Y. NUMBER 2I8I JUNE 4, I964 Relationships of the Saurischian Dinosaurs BY EDWIN H. COLBERT1 INTRODUCTION The word "Dinosauria" was coined by Sir Richard Owen in 1842 as a designation for various genera and species of extinct reptiles, the fossil bones of which were then being discovered and described in Europe. For many years this term persisted as the name for one order of reptiles and thus became well intrenched within the literature of paleontology. In- deed, since this name was associated with fossil remains that are frequently of large dimensions and spectacular shape and therefore of considerable interest to the general public, it in time became Anglicized, to take its proper place as a common noun in the English language. Almost every- body in the world is today more or less familiar with dinosaurs. As long ago as 1888, H. G. Seeley recognized the fact that the dino- saurs are not contained within a single reptilian order, but rather are quite clearly members of two distinct orders, each of which can be de- fined on the basis of many osteological characters. The structure of the pelvis is particularly useful in the separation of the two dinosaurian orders, and consequently Seeley named these two major taxonomic categories the Saurischia and the Ornithischia. This astute observation by Seeley was not readily accepted, so that for many years following the publication of his original paper proposing the basic dichotomy of the dinosaurs the 1 Chairman and Curator, Department ofVertebrate Paleontology, the American Museum of Natural History.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaurs British Isles
    DINOSAURS of the BRITISH ISLES Dean R. Lomax & Nobumichi Tamura Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett (Natural History Museum, London) Skeletal reconstructions by Scott Hartman, Jaime A. Headden & Gregory S. Paul Life and scene reconstructions by Nobumichi Tamura & James McKay CONTENTS Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett.............................................................................10 Foreword by the authors........................................................................................11 Acknowledgements................................................................................................12 Museum and institutional abbreviations...............................................................13 Introduction: An age-old interest..........................................................................16 What is a dinosaur?................................................................................................18 The question of birds and the ‘extinction’ of the dinosaurs..................................25 The age of dinosaurs..............................................................................................30 Taxonomy: The naming of species.......................................................................34 Dinosaur classification...........................................................................................37 Saurischian dinosaurs............................................................................................39 Theropoda............................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • Basal Saurischia
    TWO Basal Saurischia MAX C. LANGER The name Saurischia was coined by Seeley in lectures given in et al. 1999b; Langer et al. 2000), as well as various strata in the 1887, published in 1888, to designate those dinosaurs possessing western United States and on the Atlantic Coast of both the a propubic pelvis. This plesiomorphic feature distinguishes them United States and Canada (Olsen et al. 1989; Long and Murry from ornithischians, which have an opisthopubic pelvis. De- 1995; Hunt et al. 1998; Lucas 1998). spite its general acceptance as a taxonomic unit since the pro- Interestingly, while saurischian dinosaurs are abundant in posal of the name (Huene 1932; Romer 1956; Colbert 1964a; Steel Carnian strata and became the dominant component of vari- 1970), the monophyly of Saurischia was heavily questioned in ous Norian faunas, ornithischians are barely represented through the 1960s and 1970s (Charig et al. 1965; Charig 1976b; Reig 1970; this time interval. Pisanosaurus mertii, from the Ischigualasto Romer 1972c; Thulborn 1975; Cruickshank 1979). Its status as a Formation, is the sole reasonably well known Triassic member natural group was, however, fixed by Bakker and Galton (1974), of the group, which only achieved higher abundance and di- Bonaparte (1975b) and, more importantly, Gauthier (1986), versity during Early Jurassic times (Weishampel and Norman who formally established the monophyly of the group. 1989). The taxa discussed in this chapter (table 2.1) are usually con- sidered to be among the oldest known dinosaurs. They include the most basal saurischians, as well as various forms of uncer- Definition and Diagnosis tain affinity once assigned to the group.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Evaluation of the Enigmatic Dinosauriform Caseosaurus Crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and Its Implications for Early Dinosaur Evolution
    A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution MATTHEW G. BARON and MEGAN E. WILLIAMS Baron, M.G. and Williams, M.E. 2018. A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (1): 129–145. The holotype specimen of the Late Triassic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis is redescribed and evaluated phylogenetically for the first time, providing new anatomical information and data on the earliest dinosaurs and their evolution within the dinosauromorph lineage. Historically, Caseosaurus crosbyensis has been considered to represent an early saurischian dinosaur, and often a herrerasaur. More recent work on Triassic dinosaurs has cast doubt over its supposed dinosaurian affinities and uncertainty about particular features in the holotype and only known specimen has led to the species being regarded as a dinosauriform of indeterminate position. Here, we present a new diagnosis for Caseosaurus crosbyensis and refer additional material to the taxon—a partial right ilium from Snyder Quarry. Our com- parisons and phylogenetic analyses suggest that Caseosaurus crosbyensis belongs in a clade with herrerasaurs and that this clade is the sister taxon of Dinosauria, rather than positioned within it. This result, along with other recent analyses of early dinosaurs, pulls apart what remains of the “traditional” group of dinosaurs collectively termed saurischians into a polyphyletic assemblage and implies that Dinosauria should be regarded as composed exclusively of Ornithoscelida (Ornithischia + Theropoda) and Sauropodomorpha. In addition, our analysis recovers the enigmatic European taxon Saltopus elginensis among herrerasaurs for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy and Phylogenetic Relationships of Antetonitrus Ingenipes (Sauropodiformes, Dinosauria): Implications for the Origins of Sauropoda
    THE ANATOMY AND PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF ANTETONITRUS INGENIPES (SAUROPODIFORMES, DINOSAURIA): IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ORIGINS OF SAUROPODA Blair McPhee A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Johannesburg, 2013 i ii ABSTRACT A thorough description and cladistic analysis of the Antetonitrus ingenipes type material sheds further light on the stepwise acquisition of sauropodan traits just prior to the Triassic/Jurassic boundary. Although the forelimb of Antetonitrus and other closely related sauropododomorph taxa retains the plesiomorphic morphology typical of a mobile grasping structure, the changes in the weight-bearing dynamics of both the musculature and the architecture of the hindlimb document the progressive shift towards a sauropodan form of graviportal locomotion. Nonetheless, the presence of hypertrophied muscle attachment sites in Antetonitrus suggests the retention of an intermediary form of facultative bipedality. The term Sauropodiformes is adopted here and given a novel definition intended to capture those transitional sauropodomorph taxa occupying a contiguous position on the pectinate line towards Sauropoda. The early record of sauropod diversification and evolution is re- examined in light of the paraphyletic consensus that has emerged regarding the ‘Prosauropoda’ in recent years. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to express sincere gratitude to Adam Yates for providing me with the opportunity to do ‘real’ palaeontology, and also for gladly sharing his considerable knowledge on sauropodomorph osteology and phylogenetics. This project would not have been possible without the continued (and continual) support (both emotionally and financially) of my parents, Alf and Glenda McPhee – Thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • And Early Jurassic Sediments, and Patterns of the Triassic-Jurassic
    and Early Jurassic sediments, and patterns of the Triassic-Jurassic PAUL E. OLSEN AND tetrapod transition HANS-DIETER SUES Introduction parent answer was that the supposed mass extinc- The Late Triassic-Early Jurassic boundary is fre- tions in the tetrapod record were largely an artifact quently cited as one of the thirteen or so episodes of incorrect or questionable biostratigraphic corre- of major extinctions that punctuate Phanerozoic his- lations. On reexamining the problem, we have come tory (Colbert 1958; Newell 1967; Hallam 1981; Raup to realize that the kinds of patterns revealed by look- and Sepkoski 1982, 1984). These times of apparent ing at the change in taxonomic composition through decimation stand out as one class of the great events time also profoundly depend on the taxonomic levels in the history of life. and the sampling intervals examined. We address Renewed interest in the pattern of mass ex- those problems in this chapter. We have now found tinctions through time has stimulated novel and com- that there does indeed appear to be some sort of prehensive attempts to relate these patterns to other extinction event, but it cannot be examined at the terrestrial and extraterrestrial phenomena (see usual coarse levels of resolution. It requires new fine- Chapter 24). The Triassic-Jurassic boundary takes scaled documentation of specific faunal and floral on special significance in this light. First, the faunal transitions. transitions have been cited as even greater in mag- Stratigraphic correlation of geographically dis- nitude than those of the Cretaceous or the Permian junct rocks and assemblages predetermines our per- (Colbert 1958; Hallam 1981; see also Chapter 24).
    [Show full text]