DOCSLIB.ORG

Justice and Recognition and Justice Hrubec, Oliveira, De Sobottka, Saavedra (Eds.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Justice and Recognition and Justice Hrubec, Oliveira, De Sobottka, Saavedra (Eds.) Acknowledgements 1 Justice and Recognition and Justice Hrubec, Oliveira, De Sobottka, Saavedra (eds.) PUCRS Nythamar de Oliveira, Marek Hrubec, Emil Sobottka, Giovani Saavedra (eds.) Justice and Recognition F On Axel Honneth and Critical Theory AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements 11 F PUCRS 2 Justice and Recognition Introduction 3 Justice and Recognition 4 Justice and Recognition Introduction 5 Nythamar de Oliveira, Marek Hrubec, Emil Sobottka, Giovani Saavedra (eds.) Justice and Recognition On Axel Honneth and Critical Theory PUCRS, Porto Alegre Filosofia, Prague 2015 6 Justice and Recognition This collection © PUCRS, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2015 This collection © Filosofia, publishing house of the Institute of Philosophy of CAS, Prague, 2015 Axel Honneth’s articles © Suhrkamp Verlag, 2012 Copyright of individual articles © held by the individual authors, 2015 Cover and Typography © Markéta Jelenová, 2015 ISBN 978-80-7007-435-0 (print book) ISBN 978-80-7007-698-9 (e-book) DOI 10.47376/filosofia.2015.2 Acknowledgements 7 Table of Contents Acknowledgements . 11 Introduction Nythamar de Oliveira, Marek Hrubec, Emil Sobottka and Giovani Saavedra. 13 I ARTICULATION OF SOCIAL RECOGNITION Recognition and the Right to Difference: Critical Theory, Diversity and the Human Rights Culture Eduardo C. B. Bittar . 27 Affi rmative Action, Recognition, Self-Respect: Axel Honneth and the Phenomenological Defi cit of Critical Theory Nythamar de Oliveira . 49 Honneth and Lacan on the Limits of Recognition Rodrigo Nunes . 73 Recognition and Learning Processes in Modern Societies Emil A. Sobottka . 89 Defl ationary Ontology and Objective Ethics: In Search of the Ontological Assumptions of the Theory of Recognition Eduardo Luft . 105 8 Justice and Recognition II RECOGNITION IN LEGAL JUSTICE The Fabric of Justice: On the Limits of Proceduralism Axel Honneth . 155 Between Civil Society and State: Considerations on Axel Honneth’s Critical Theory of Justice Hans-Georg Flickinger . 181 Legal Good and Recognition: A Study in Axel Honneth’s Social Theory Fabio Roberto D’Avila, Giovani Agostini Saavedra . 199 Minimal Income as Basic Condition for Autonomy Alessandro Pinzani . .223 Recognition and Transitional Justice in Brazil: a Critical Theory Approach on Reasons for a Truth Commission on the Dictatorial Regime of 1964–1985 Vitor S. L. Blotta, Wilson Levy, Brunela Vincenzi . 239 III RECOGNITION IN INTERNATIONAL AND GLOBAL JUSTICE Recognition between States: On the Moral Substrate of International Relations Axel Honneth . .265 Interstate Recognition and Its Global Overcoming: Extra-territorial Recognition Marek Hrubec . .287 Towards a Cosmopolitan Theory of Recognition between States Frédéric Vandenberghe . 325 Introduction 9 IV JUSTICE AND RECOGNITION WITHIN A THEORETICAL CONTEXT Rawls and Habermas on Justice and Pluralism Luiz Bernardo Leite Araujo . 341 Deliberative Democracy and Public Reason Kenneth Baynes . 359 Social Movements and Lifeworld: Making Sense of Subjective Interpretation Hermílio Santos . .399 Rights as Entitlements and Rights as Claims Marco Antonio Oliveira de Azevedo . 423 List of Contributors . .445 Index . .447 10 Justice and Recognition Acknowledgements 11 Acknowledgements Professor Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition and his signifi cant con- tributions to a Critical social theory have been widely read and studied in many parts of the world. One of the strong receptions has been in Latin America, where a Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School has been very infl uential since the 1960s and 1970s, when emancipatory grassroots movements and protests against military rule took place all over the subcontinent. The Fourth International Symposium on Justice, which was held at Porto Alegre, Brazil, brought together researchers, teachers and students from graduate programs in philosophy, legal sciences, social sciences and humanities from Brazil and other Latin American and European countries to discuss ongoing struggles for social justice and recogni- tion in times of crisis and globalization, but also of attempts for more inclusive participation and democratization. Thanks to the decisive support of Brazilian federal research agencies (CAPES and CNPq) and the Goethe Institute at Porto Alegre, the fourth edition of the sympo- sium on justice was launched with a view toward discussing the theo- ry of social recognition of Professor Axel Honneth, whose reception and analysis in Brazil and other Latin American countries has already resulted in intense dialogue with colleagues in Europe and the Ameri- cas. The event featured fi fteen presentations of seminal works with the participation of Axel Honneth, who also presented two lectures and debated with fellow Brazilian colleagues and foreign guests, besides over twenty contributing papers read by researchers in thematic sessions during three days. This volume contains the major contributions to the symposium, including the two papers delivered by Axel Honneth. The book is a result of the co-operation of colleagues from Porto Alegre and Prague, Czech Republic, where one of the relevant confer- ences on Critical Theory has taken place in the Institute of Philosophy at the Czech Academy of Sciences every year since 1993. Axel Hon- neth was one of the conference directors for many years, and has been honorary director till now. On this basis, we will also continue in this co-operation between Latin America and Europe in the future. We thank especially Axel Honneth for the inspiration and for many friendly discussions and continual cooperation during the last years. We are grateful to all our colleagues who contributed their chapters of the 12 Justice and Recognition book, all colleagues who made important commentaries in various dis- cussions, and our institutions which supported our work: the Pontifi cal Catholic University (PUCRS) in Porto Alegre and the Centre of Global Studies, a joint centre of the Institute of Philosophy at the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and Charles University in Prague. And of course, we appreciate the work of all the people responsible for the administrative process of the publication of the book as well. The editors Introduction 13 Introduction Nythamar de Oliveira, Marek Hrubec, Emil Sobottka and Giovani Saavedra Justice is an important theme which has been studied for thousands years and is highly important today as well. Critical theorists have been aware of both injustice in practice and the serious defi cits in social re- search of injustice which have been made by various traditional and contemporary studies. Critical theory also makes it possible to develop an alternative description of the society and normative articulation of the required state of society. However, it can be done in various ways. In this book, we offer essays focusing on a connection between injustice and misrecognition, respectively justice and recognition (Anerkennung). Such a formulation of the issue of justice and recognition is closely linked with Axel Honneth as a critical theorist who mostly contribut- ed to philosophical and social scientifi c research on recognition. As is well known, Honneth is a Professor of Social Philosophy and current Director of the Institute for Social Research (Institut für Sozialforschung) at the University of Frankfurt, and primarily one of the most relevant exponents of the third generation of the Frankfurt School.1 Honneth has followed the main constitutive motives of the Frank- furt School worked out by the fi rst generation of critical theorists, and, at the same time, he shares a critique of its monological paradigm of work in favor of an intersubjective turn initiated especially by the sec- ond generation. However, he considers an intersubjective paradigm of communicative action too narrow, and addresses, not just the issues of 1 Axel Honneth was born in 1949. He studied philosophy, sociology and German liter- ature in Bonn and Bochum. He studied post-gradual studies at Freie Universität in Berlin where he defended his dissertation in 1982. He was a scientifi c assistant there from 1977 to 1982 as well. Then, he worked with Jürgen Habermas at Max-Planck-Institute for Social Sciences in Starnberg from 1982 to 1983 and at Goethe-Universität in Frankfurt am Main from 1983 to 1989. Later, he was professor of philosophy at the University of Konstanz from 1991 to 1992, and professor of political philosophy at Freie Universität in Berlin from 1992 to 1996. Since 1996, he is professor of social philosophy at Goethe-Universität in Frankfurt am Main where he is also Director of the Institute for Social Research since 2001. Now he is also professor for the humanities at Columbia University in New York. 14 Justice and Recognition communication, but also of other aspects of life which he articulates by means of a broader concept of mutual recognition among individuals in the community. It is connected with the replacement of a consen- sual concept of communication by a confl ictual concept of struggle for recognition, which well co-responds to the original ideas of the Critical theory formulated by their founders and other social critics. Thus, his own contribution is formulated as a confl ictual paradigm of social recognition within an intersubjective model. However, he also tries to integrate positive moments of earlier paradigms, including a reactualization of Hegel’s philosophy. Honneth has developed an original normative – specifi cally moral – theory of struggle for recognition which is based on identifi cation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide for Educators and Students TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Munich Secession and America A Guide for Educators and Students TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR EDUCATORS GETTING STARTED 3 ABOUT THE FRYE 3 THE MUNICH SECESSION AND AMERICA 4 FOR STUDENTS WELCOME! 5 EXPERIENCING ART AT THE FRYE 5 A LITTLE CONTEXT 6 MAJOR THEMES 8 SELECTED WORKS AND IN-GALLERY DISCUSSION QUESTIONS The Prisoner 9 Picture Book 1 10 Dutch Courtyard 11 Calm before the Storm 12 The Dancer (Tänzerin) Baladine Klossowska 13 The Botanists 14 The Munich Secession and America January 24–April 12, 2009 SKETCH IT! 15 A Guide for Educators and Students BACK AT SCHOOL 15 The Munich Secession and America is organized by the Frye in GLOSSARY 16 collaboration with the Museum Villa Stuck, Munich, and is curated by Frye Foundation Scholar and Director Emerita of the Museum Villa Stuck, Jo-Anne Birnie Danzker. This self-guide was created by Deborah Sepulvida, the Frye’s manager of student and teacher programs, and teaching artist Chelsea Green. FOR EDUCATORS GETTING STARTED This guide includes a variety of materials designed to help educators and students prepare for their visit to the exhibition The Munich Secession and America, which is on view at the Frye Art Museum, January 24–April 12, 2009. Materials include resources and activities for use before, during, and after visits. The goal of this guide is to challenge students to think critically about what they see and to engage in the process of experiencing and discussing art. It is intended to facilitate students’ personal discoveries about art and is aimed at strengthening the skills that allow students to view art independently.
    [Show full text]
  • Secession and the Theory & Practice of International
    SECESSION AND THE THEORY & PRACTICE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Linda Suzanne Bishai A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations Summer 1999 London School of Economics & Political Science UMI Number: U123126 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Disscrrlation Publishing UMI U123126 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 yscit5 7'0S23 Abstract Secession has been noticeably absent from International Relations theory although its role in the creation and recognition of states is clearly relevant. Traditionally, the dominant perspectives in IR have not questioned state formation and this has effectively barred secession as a topic since it cannot be thoroughly treated without looking across the inside/outside divide of state sovereignty. Secession must be placed in its historical context — as a phenomenon only possible in the modem era and only perceived as a global threat in this century. Theorists from other disciphnes who have discussed secession have rehed on a problem­ solving theoretical perspective which has kept them from considering secession as an outcome of problematic assumptions about identity and territory in the international system.
    [Show full text]
  • Klirnt and Schiele Stephan Kleinschuster May 6, 1997 AR592
    The Evolution of Expressionism In Turn-of-the-Century Vienna: Klirnt and Schiele Stephan Kleinschuster May 6, 1997 AR592 1 1 Until 1897, Classicism in Viennese high art had served as a mimetic construct of the elite society who were both art's staunchest supporters and the purveyors of moral and philosophical values that served as it's staple of judgment. In the following years, from 1898 to 1918, were revolutions of both natures, political and philosophical. The artistic transformation from the Classicism of the Habsburg Monarchy to the expressionism of the Cafe "Nihilism" could be seen most obviously in two of Vienna's foremost artists of the time, Gustav Klimt and Egon Schiele. This paper seeks to compare and contrast the works of these two artists who seem to crystallize the moral, social, political, and artistic upheaval of early Twentieth Century Vienna. It lS fitting that Gustav Klimt and Egon Schiele died six months from one another, both of the Spanish influenza, and both in 1918. It is important to note that even though stylistic variables call for their ultimate contrast, they loved and admired one another, and they both stood for the values that defined Secessionism. Their proximity in philosophy makes it all the more profound to discover their differences. In Klimt came classical objectivity housed in a contemporary conceptual framework. In Schiele came the shift to brutal subjectivity that pushed the limits of this framework. Even though, as will be discussed, the similarity of the subject matter seems to remain a constant, the execution becomes the variable upon which the change becomes dependent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Avant-Garde 1912-1930" Has Been Directedby Magdalenadabrowski, Curatorial Assistant in the Departmentof Drawings
    Trustees of The Museum of Modern Art leV'' ST,?' T Chairm<ln ,he Boord;Ga,dner Cowles ViceChairman;David Rockefeller,Vice Chairman;Mrs. John D, Rockefeller3rd, President;Mrs. Bliss 'Ce!e,Slder";''i ITTT V P NealJ Farrel1Tfeasure Mrs. DouglasAuchincloss, Edward $''""'S-'ev C Burdl Tn ! u o J M ArmandP Bar,osGordonBunshaft Shi,| C. Burden,William A. M. Burden,Thomas S. Carroll,Frank T. Cary,Ivan Chermayeff, ai WniinT S S '* Gianlui Gabeltl,Paul Gottlieb, George Heard Hdmilton, Wal.aceK. Harrison, Mrs.Walter Hochschild,» Mrs. John R. Jakobson PhilipJohnson mM'S FrankY Larkin,Ronalds. Lauder,John L. Loeb,Ranald H. Macdanald,*Dondd B. Marron,Mrs. G. MaccullochMiller/ J. Irwin Miller/ S.I. Newhouse,Jr., RichardE Oldenburg,John ParkinsonIII, PeterG. Peterson,Gifford Phillips, Nelson A. Rockefeller* Mrs.Albrecht Saalfield, Mrs. Wolfgang Schoenborn/ MartinE. Segal,Mrs Bertram Smith,James Thrall Soby/ Mrs.Alfred R. Stern,Mrs. Donald B. Straus,Walter N um'dWard'9'* WhlTlWheeler/ Johni hTO Hay Whitney*u M M Warbur Mrs CliftonR. Wharton,Jr., Monroe * HonoraryTrustee Ex Officio 0'0'he "ri$°n' Ctty ot^New^or^ °' ' ^ °' "** H< J Goldin Comptrollerat the Copyright© 1978 by TheMuseum of ModernArt All rightsreserved ISBN0-87070-545-8 TheMuseum of ModernArt 11West 53 Street,New York, N.Y 10019 Printedin the UnitedStates of America Foreword Asa resultof the pioneeringinterest of its first Director,Alfred H. Barr,Jr., TheMuseum of ModernArt acquireda substantialand uniquecollection of paintings,sculpture, drawings,and printsthat illustratecrucial points in the Russianartistic evolution during the secondand third decadesof this century.These holdings have been considerably augmentedduring the pastfew years,most recently by TheLauder Foundation's gift of two watercolorsby VladimirTatlin, the only examplesof his work held in a public collectionin the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Staging Revolution: the Constructivist Debate About Composition
    Staging Revolution: The Constructivist Debate about Composition Introduction Among the relatively few areas of agreement after the 1917 Russian Revolution, two are particularly noteworthy. The first is the widespread perception that the urban environment was chaotic. Whereas few people agreed as to the source of this chaos (choosing to blame it on the capitalists, the architects, or the intelligentsia), almost everyone believed that urban life after the revolution did not justify the sacrifices and traumas imposed by three years of civil war. The second area of agreement concerned the role of the theater: despite continued and almost irreconcilable differences about what the future should look like, there was almost complete agreement that art and theater could be “weapons” or tools in the revolution. Theater, in particular, would lead the way: from Lenin’s project for monumental propaganda (1918) to the Russian futurists’ declaration that the “streets should be a holiday of art for the people,” there was widespread agreement that art should be taken to the streets, that it was capable of communicating messages in a voice which would be understood, and that theatricality was the key to the unification of the arts. Ironically, one of the reasons why constructivism has been so difficult to study is the fact that it was long understood as a form of art which was against the creation of art. But one of the core values of constructivism was not the rejection of art but the belief that the only type of art which has meaning is one which challenges boundaries and definitions, and that part of this challenge concerns the relationship between the audience and the art work, whether we talk about theater, cinema, photography, or objects.
    [Show full text]
  • David Quigley Learning to Live: Preliminary Notes for a Program Of
    David Quigley In an essay published in 2009, Boris could play in a broader social context influenced the founding director John Groys makes the claim that “today art beyond the narrow realm of the art Andrew Rice, as well as the professors Learning to Live: education has no definite goal, no world. Josef Albers, Merce Cunningham, Robert Preliminary Notes method, no particular content that can Motherwell, John Cage, and the poets be taught, no tradition that can be Performing Pragmatism: Robert Creeley and Charles Olson. for a Program of Art transmitted to a new generation—which Art as Experience Unlike other trajectories of the critique Education for the is to say, it has too many.”69 While one On the first pages of Dewey’s Art as of the art object, the Deweyian tradition might agree with this diagnosis, one Experience from 1934, we read: did not deny the special status of art in 21st Century. immediately wonders how we should itself but rather resituated it within a Après John Dewey assess it. Are we to merely tacitly “By one of the ironic perversities that continuum of human experience. Dewey, acknowledge this situation or does this often attend the course of affairs, the as a thinker of egalitarianism and critique imply a call for change? Is this existence of the works of art upon which democracy, created a theory of art lack (or paradoxical overabundance) of the formation of an aesthetic theory based on the fundamental continuity goals, methods or content inherent to depends has become an obstruction of experience and practice, making the very essence of art education, or is to theory about them.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Art Magazine Issue # Sixteen December | January Twothousandnine Spedizione in A.P
    contemporary art magazine issue # sixteen december | january twothousandnine Spedizione in a.p. -70% _ DCB Milano NOVEMBER TO JANUARY, 2009 KAREN KILIMNIK NOVEMBER TO JANUARY, 2009 WadeGUYTON BLURRY CatherineSULLIVAN in collaboration with Sean Griffin, Dylan Skybrook and Kunle Afolayan Triangle of Need VibekeTANDBERG The hamburger turns in my stomach and I throw up on you. RENOIR Liquid hamburger. Then I hit you. After that we are both out of words. January - February 2009 DEBUSSY URS FISCHER GALERIE EVA PRESENHUBER WWW.PRESENHUBER.COM TEL: +41 (0) 43 444 70 50 / FAX: +41 (0) 43 444 70 60 LIMMATSTRASSE 270, P.O.BOX 1517, CH–8031 ZURICH GALLERY HOURS: TUE-FR 12-6, SA 11-5 DOUG AITKEN, EMMANUELLE ANTILLE, MONIKA BAER, MARTIN BOYCE, ANGELA BULLOCH, VALENTIN CARRON, VERNE DAWSON, TRISHA DONNELLY, MARIA EICHHORN, URS FISCHER, PETER FISCHLI/DAVID WEISS, SYLVIE FLEURY, LIAM GILLICK, DOUGLAS GORDON, MARK HANDFORTH, CANDIDA HÖFER, KAREN KILIMNIK, ANDREW LORD, HUGO MARKL, RICHARD PRINCE, GERWALD ROCKENSCHAUB, TIM ROLLINS AND K.O.S., UGO RONDINONE, DIETER ROTH, EVA ROTHSCHILD, JEAN-FRÉDÉRIC SCHNYDER, STEVEN SHEARER, JOSH SMITH, BEAT STREULI, FRANZ WEST, SUE WILLIAMS DOUBLESTANDARDS.NET 1012_MOUSSE_AD_Dec2008.indd 1 28.11.2008 16:55:12 Uhr Galleria Emi Fontana MICHAEL SMITH Viale Bligny 42 20136 Milano Opening 17 January 2009 T. +39 0258322237 18 January - 28 February F. +39 0258306855 [email protected] www.galleriaemifontana.com Photo General Idea, 1981 David Lamelas, The Violent Tapes of 1975, 1975 - courtesy: Galerie Kienzie & GmpH, Berlin L’allarme è generale. Iper e sovraproduzione, scialo e vacche grasse si sono tra- sformati di colpo in inflazione, deflazione e stagflazione.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distancing-Embracing Model of the Enjoyment of Negative Emotions in Art Reception
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2017), Page 1 of 63 doi:10.1017/S0140525X17000309, e347 The Distancing-Embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception Winfried Menninghaus1 Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Valentin Wagner Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Julian Hanich Department of Arts, Culture and Media, University of Groningen, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands [email protected] Eugen Wassiliwizky Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany [email protected] Thomas Jacobsen Experimental Psychology Unit, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, 22043 Hamburg, Germany [email protected] Stefan Koelsch University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway [email protected] Abstract: Why are negative emotions so central in art reception far beyond tragedy? Revisiting classical aesthetics in the light of recent psychological research, we present a novel model to explain this much discussed (apparent) paradox. We argue that negative emotions are an important resource for the arts in general, rather than a special license for exceptional art forms only. The underlying rationale is that negative emotions have been shown to be particularly powerful in securing attention, intense emotional involvement, and high memorability, and hence is precisely what artworks strive for. Two groups of processing mechanisms are identified that conjointly adopt the particular powers of negative emotions for art’s purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Dadaism? Some Explanations and Definitions Dada Was, Officially, Not a Movement, Its Artists Not Artists and Its Art Not Art
    What is Dadaism? Some explanations and definitions Dada was, officially, not a movement, its artists not artists and its art not art. That sounds easy enough, doesn't it? Of course, there is a bit more to the story of Dadaism than this simplistic explanation. Dada was a literary and artistic movement born in Europe at a time when the horror of World War It was being played out in what amounted to citizens' front yards. Due to the war, a number of artists, writers and intellectuals - notably of French and German nationality - found themselves congregating in the refuge that Zurich (in neutral Switzerland) offered. Far from merely feeling relief at their respective escapes, this bunch was pretty ticked off that modern European society would allow the war to have happened. They were so angry, in fact, that they undertook the time-honored artistic tradition of protesting. Banding together in a loosely-knit group, these writers and artists used any public forum they could find to (metaphorically) spit on nationalism, rationalism, materialism and any other -ism which they felt had contributed to a senseless war. In other words, the Dadaists were fed up. If society is going in this direction, they said, we'll have no part of it or its traditions. Including...no, wait!...especially artistic traditions. We, who are non-artists, will create non-art - since art (and everything else in the world) has no meaning, anyway. About the only thing these non-artists all had in common were their ideals. They even had a hard time agreeing on a name for their project.
    [Show full text]
  • Futurism-Anthology.Pdf
    FUTURISM FUTURISM AN ANTHOLOGY Edited by Lawrence Rainey Christine Poggi Laura Wittman Yale University Press New Haven & London Disclaimer: Some images in the printed version of this book are not available for inclusion in the eBook. Published with assistance from the Kingsley Trust Association Publication Fund established by the Scroll and Key Society of Yale College. Frontispiece on page ii is a detail of fig. 35. Copyright © 2009 by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Designed by Nancy Ovedovitz and set in Scala type by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Printed in the United States of America by Sheridan Books. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Futurism : an anthology / edited by Lawrence Rainey, Christine Poggi, and Laura Wittman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-300-08875-5 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Futurism (Art) 2. Futurism (Literary movement) 3. Arts, Modern—20th century. I. Rainey, Lawrence S. II. Poggi, Christine, 1953– III. Wittman, Laura. NX456.5.F8F87 2009 700'.4114—dc22 2009007811 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48–1992 (Permanence of Paper). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS Acknowledgments xiii Introduction: F. T. Marinetti and the Development of Futurism Lawrence Rainey 1 Part One Manifestos and Theoretical Writings Introduction to Part One Lawrence Rainey 43 The Founding and Manifesto of Futurism (1909) F.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book Kazimir Malevich
    KAZIMIR MALEVICH PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Achim Borchardt-Hume | 264 pages | 21 Apr 2015 | TATE PUBLISHING | 9781849761468 | English | London, United Kingdom Kazimir Malevich PDF Book From the beginning of the s, modern art was falling out of favor with the new government of Joseph Stalin. Red Cavalry Riding. Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students. The movement did have a handful of supporters amongst the Russian avant garde but it was dwarfed by its sibling constructivism whose manifesto harmonized better with the ideological sentiments of the revolutionary communist government during the early days of Soviet Union. What's more, as the writers and abstract pundits were occupied with what constituted writing, Malevich came to be interested by the quest for workmanship's barest basics. Black Square. Woman Torso. The painting's quality has degraded considerably since it was drawn. Guggenheim —an early and passionate collector of the Russian avant-garde—was inspired by the same aesthetic ideals and spiritual quest that exemplified Malevich's art. Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Use dmy dates from May All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June Lyubov Popova - You might like Left Right. Harvard doctoral candidate Julia Bekman Chadaga writes: "In his later writings, Malevich defined the 'additional element' as the quality of any new visual environment bringing about a change in perception Retrieved 6 July A white cube decorated with a black square was placed on his tomb. It was one of the most radical improvements in dynamic workmanship. Landscape with a White House.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking and Remaking a High School Art Foundations Curriculum
    Rethinking and Remaking a High School Art Foundations Curriculum Jethro Gillespie A Thesis In the Department of Art Education Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Art Education) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada February, 2018 © Jethro Gillespie, 2018 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Jethro Gillespie Entitled: Rethinking and Remaking a High School Art Foundations Curriculum and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor Of Philosophy (Art Education) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: Chair Dr. Mark Watson External Examiner Dr. Mary Hafeli External to Program Dr. Robert Cassidy Examiner Dr. Daniel Barney Examiner Dr. Lorrie Blair Examiner Dr. MJ Thompson Thesis Supervisor Dr. Juan Carlos Castro Approved by Dr. Lorrie Blair, Graduate Program Director Wednesday, April 4, 2018 Dr. Rebecca Taylor Duclos, Dean Faculty of Fine Arts ABSTRACT Rethinking and Remaking a High School Art Foundations Curriculum Jethro Gillespie, Ph.D. Concordia University, 2018 This research study examines my experience as a high school art educator as I attempted to rethink and remake a high school art foundations curriculum. For this study, I utilized a theoretical framework of complexity thinking as it pertains to the dynamic phenomena of teaching and learning to critically approach and challenge traditional pedagogical approaches to teaching an art foundations course. Processing data collected from two classes over the course of a semester (January-May, 2016), I utilized a Design-Based Research (DBR) methodology to iteratively examine the effects of a newly designed curriculum whose central focus was to promote the potential benefits of treating contemporary artists as creative role models by examining various aspects of their artistic practices with students.
    [Show full text]