Mongol Empire 1206–1691

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Mongol Empire 1206–1691 EMPIRE/DYNASTY/PRINCIPALITIES EVENTS 1 1206–1260s 1200 Mongol Empire 1 1206 Temujin completes unification of Mongol people into Mongol state and rules as Genghis Khan to 1227. 1271–1368 2 During his reign, Genghis Khan sets out on a series of Yuan dynasty of China conquests. Ih Zasag (code of laws) introduced 1211–1215 Mongols conquer Chin dynasty’s 3 1368–1634 Northern Yuan dynasty 1250 northern domains (including what is now Beijing), gaining control of Silk Road and part of Hsi Hsia kingdom 4 1543–1691 2 1220 Construction of Karakorum, Mongol Empire’s Independent principalities capital begins 1227 Hsi Hsia kingdom fully conquered. Death of Genghis Khan. Empire divided into four realms 1300 between sons: Zuchi, Chagatai, Ogodei, and Tului 1229 Ogodei created Great Khan (overlord of whole empire) by Hurildai (great Mongol assembly). Ogodei reigns until 1241 1230 Mongols invade Persia 1234 Mongols totally conquer Chin dynasty in northern 1350 China 1237–1242 Mongol invasions of Europe and Russia 3 1256 Khanates of Golden Horde and Il Khans established 1260s Mongol khanates become independent states 1260–1294 Reign of Kublai Khan over Mongol Empire. 1400 Mongol Empire reaches its greatest extent before breaking up into independent states 1264 Khanbalik (modern Beijing) established as capital of Mongol Empire 1271 Kublai Khan establishes Yuan dynasty in China over Empire of Great Khan (eastern realm of former 1450 Mongol Empire) 1279 Mongols conquer Southern Sung 1320–1370 Reign of Yuan emperor and Northern Yuan king Togstomor 1368 Chinese Ming dynasty overthrows Mongol rule. End of Yuan dynasty of China. Mongol Northern Yuan 1500 dynasty established by Togstomor at Karakorum 1388–1433 Chaotic period in Mongolia: rival factions fight each other for supremacy 1433–1451 Reign of Northern Yuan king Taisung Khan. Reunites much of Mongolia 1451 After Taisung’s death, Mongolia begins to 4 fragment again A Mongol archer from the army of 1550 1479 Northern Yuan boy-king Dayan Khan ascends Kublai Khan (reigned 1260–1294). It throne. Mongolian political unity achieved by Mandhai was the Mongols’ skill in archery and Setsen, dowager queen and regent cavalry tactics that led to their huge 1543 Empire fragments on death of Dayan Khan into conquests. independent principalities 1543–1583 Reign of great Mongol prince Altan Khan, 1600 grandson of Dayan Khan 1605–1634 Reign of last Northern Yuan king Ligden Khan over remaining Northern Yuan territories 1636 Princes of “Inner” Mongolia acknowledge Ch’ing (Manchu) rule 1650 1688 Princes of “Outer” Mongolia acknowledge Ch’ing rule 1691 Ch’ing dynasty formally annexes Mongolia 1700.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Mongol Lawâ•Fla Concise Historical Survey
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UW Law Digital Commons (University of Washington) Washington Law Review Volume 23 Number 2 5-1-1948 Mongol Law—A Concise Historical Survey V. A. Riasanovsky Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr Digital Par t of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Commons Network Recommended Citation Logo V. A. Riasanovsky, Far Eastern Section, Mongol Law—A Concise Historical Survey, 23 Wash. L. Rev. & St. B.J. 166 (1948). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wlr/vol23/iss2/9 This Far Eastern Section is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington Law Review by an authorized editor of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW Soviet society is thought of as a moral or "moral-political" unity; its members are but youths and children, requiring training and educa- tion, Soviet law educates them to a Communist social-consciousness, "ingrafting upon them," in the words of a recent Soviet writer," "high, noble feelings." However repressive the Soviet legal system may ap- pear to the "reasonable man" of American tradition, the importance of the underlying conception of Law as a teacher should not be minimized. 14 Kareva, The Role of Soviet Law in the Education of Communist Conscsousness, BOLSHEVIK, No. 4 (in Russian) (1947). MONGOL LAW-A CONCISE HISTORICAL SURVEY V A. RiAsANOVSKY* Two basic systems of law, one Chinese, the other Mongol, co- existed in Eastern Asia.
[Show full text]
Nomadic Incursion MMW 13, Lecture 3
MMW 13, Lecture 3 Nomadic Incursion HOW and Why? The largest Empire before the British Empire What we talked about in last lecture 1) No pure originals 2) History is interrelated 3) Before Westernization (16th century) was southernization 4) Global integration happened because of human interaction: commerce, religion and war. Known by many names “Ruthless” “Bloodthirsty” “madman” “brilliant politician” “destroyer of civilizations” “The great conqueror” “Genghis Khan” Ruling through the saddle Helped the Eurasian Integration Euroasia in Fragments Afro-Eurasia Afro-Eurasian complex as interrelational societies Cultures circulated and accumulated in complex ways, but always interconnected. Contact Zones 1. Eurasia: (Hemispheric integration) a) Mediterranean-Mesopotamia b) Subcontinent 2) Euro-Africa a) Africa-Mesopotamia 3) By the late 15th century Transatlantic (Globalization) Africa-Americas 12th century Song and Jin dynasties Abbasids: fragmented: Fatimads in Egypt are overtaken by the Ayyubid dynasty (Saladin) Africa: North Africa and Sub-Saharan Africa Europe: in the periphery; Roman catholic is highly bureaucratic and society feudal How did these zones become connected? Nomadic incursions Xiongunu Huns (Romans) White Huns (Gupta state in India) Avars Slavs Bulgars Alans Uighur Turks ------------------------------------------------------- In Antiquity, nomads were known for: 1. War 2. Migration Who are the Nomads? Tribal clan-based people--at times formed into confederate forces-- organized based on pastoral or agricultural economies. 1) Migrate so to adapt to the ecological and changing climate conditions. 2) Highly competitive on a tribal basis. 3) Religion: Shamanistic & spirit-possession Two Types of Nomadic peoples 1. Pastoral: lifestyle revolves around living off the meat, milk and hides of animals that are domesticated as they travel through arid lands.
[Show full text]
Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Ilkhanate of Iran
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi POWER, POLITICS, AND TRADITION IN THE MONGOL EMPIRE AND THE ĪlkhānaTE OF IRAN OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi Power, Politics, and Tradition in the Mongol Empire and the Īlkhānate of Iran MICHAEL HOPE 1 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 08/08/16, SPi 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6D P, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © Michael Hope 2016 The moral rights of the author have been asserted First Edition published in 2016 Impression: 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Control Number: 2016932271 ISBN 978–0–19–876859–3 Printed in Great Britain by Clays Ltd, St Ives plc Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and for information only.
[Show full text]
The Development of Mongol Identity in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries Witness
■ Source: Itinerario 24:2 (2000), pp. 44–61. THE DEVELOPMENT OF MONGOL IDENTITY IN THE SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries witnessed the development of a Mongol identity. The Mongol conquests in the thirteenth century had laid the foundations but had not truly forged such an identity. These earlier events provided, in modern parlance, the cultural memory that eventu- ally served to unify them. However, the Mongol Empire actually revealed the fractiousness of the Mongols and their inability to promote the unity that might gradually have fostered a Mongol identity. As Joseph Fletcher argued, the creation of a supra-tribal identity for nomadic herders has proven to be extremely difficult.1 The so-called Mongol Empire attested to this predicament, as within two generations it evolved into four separate Khanates, which occasionally waged war against each other. For example, individual Khanates frequently sided with non-Mongols against fellow Mongols. In addition, the military, the quintessential Mongol institution, was not, as the Empire expanded, composed simply of Mongols. Turks, Persians, and even Chinese served in and sometimes led the Mongol armies, contributing to the blurring of Mongol identity. The glorious successes of the Mongol Empire offered later Mongols solace and the model of a great historical legacy. During the Ming era, different leaders, Esen in the fifteenth century and the Dayan Khan in the sixteenth century, sought to unify the Mongols, but both failed to elicit suf- ficient support.2 In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, faced with threats to their lands and to their very existence, the Mongols repeatedly sought to identify with heroes of the past, an effort that was significant in inspiring bonds of identity.
[Show full text]
Europeans and the Steppe: Russian Lands Under the Mongol Rule
Neumann, Iver B. Europeans and the steppe: Russian lands under the Mongol rule Book section Original citation: Neumann, Iver B. (2014) Europeans and the steppe: Russian lands under the Mongol rule. In: Zhang, Yongjin, Suzuki, Shogo and Quirk, Joel, (eds.) International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West. New International Relations. Routledge. ISBN 9780415626286 © 2014 Routledge This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/65998/ Available in LSE Research Online: April 2016 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Europeans and the Steppe: Russian lands under the Mongol Rule Chapter for Yongjin Zhang, Shogo Suzuki & Joel Quirk (eds.) International orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West London: Routledge. Iver B. Neumann [email protected] It was endemic on the medieval religious frontier not to admit consciously that one had borrowed institutions from conquered or conquering peoples of a different religion.
[Show full text]
The Mongol and Ming Empire
Zhu Yuanzhang a peasant leader, created a rebel army that defeated the Mongols and pushed them back beyond the Great Wall It could be cruel if you were not a Mongol. Mongols had more privileges than Chinese people. The Mongols held more government jobs. And If you were Chinese you had to pay a tribute to the Mongols at the end of each month They restored the civil service system They were able to delegate responsibility to lower levels of government to reduce corruption They improved new ways for farming and restored the canal to improve trading What advantage would riding on horseback have during warfare? Section 2 Unit 12 The Mongols were nomadic people who grazed their horses and sheep in Central Asia In the early 1200’s, a brilliant Mongol chieftain united tribes. This chieftain took the name Genghis Khan meaning “universal ruler” Mongol forces conquered a vast empire that stretched from the Pacific Ocean to Eastern Europe Genghis Khan demanded absolute loyalty His army had the most skilled horsemen in the world He could order the massacre of an entire city The Mongols and the Chinese would often attack each other by launching missiles against each other from metal tubes filled with gunpowder Although Genghis Khan did not live to complete his conquest of China his heirs continued to expand the empire. The Mongols dominated much of Asia The Mongols allowed people they conquered to live peaceful lives as long as they paid tribute to the Mongols In the 1200’s and 1300’s the sons and grandsons of Genghis Khan established peace and order.
[Show full text]
The Ilkhanid Mongols, the Christian Armenians, and the Islamic Mamluks : a Study of Their Relations, 1220-1335
University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2012 The Ilkhanid Mongols, the Christian Armenians, and the Islamic Mamluks : a study of their relations, 1220-1335. Lauren Prezbindowski University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Prezbindowski, Lauren, "The Ilkhanid Mongols, the Christian Armenians, and the Islamic Mamluks : a study of their relations, 1220-1335." (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1152. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1152 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ILKHANID MONGOLS, THE CHRISTIAN ARMENIANS, AND THE ISLAMIC MAMLUKS: A STUDY OF THEIR RELATIONS, 1220-1335 By Lauren Prezbindowski B.A., Hanover College, 2008 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of Louisville December 2012 THE ILKHANID MONGOLS, THE CHRISTIAN ARMENIANS, AND THE ISLAMIC MAMLUKS: A STUDY OF THEIR RELATIONS, 1220-1335 By Lauren Prezbindowski B.A., Hanover College, 2008 A Thesis Approved on November 15,2012 By the following Thesis Committee: Dr. John McLeod, Thesis Director Dr.
[Show full text]
AP World History Class Notes Ch 18 Mongols & Eurasian Nomads
AP World History Class Notes Ch 18 Mongols & Eurasian Nomads December 5, 2010 Nomadic herders populated the steppes of Asia for centuries during the classical & postclassical eras & periodically came into contact & conflict w/ the established states & empires of the Eurasian land mass. It was not until the 11th century, however, that the nomadic peoples like the Turks & Mongols began to raid, conquer, rule, & trade w/ the urban-based cultures in a systematic & far-reaching manner. While these resourceful & warlike nomads often left a path of destruction in their wake, they also built vast transregional empires that laid the foundations for the increasing communication & exchange that would characterize the period from 1000 to 1500 in the E hemisphere. The success of these nomadic empires in this era can be attributed to • Their unmatched skill on horseback. When organized on a large scale these nomads were practically indomitable in warfare. Outstanding cavalry forces, skilled archers, & well-coordinated military strategy gave these peoples an advantage that was difficult for even the most powerful states to counter. • Their ability to integrate vast territories through secure trade routes, exceptional courier networks, diplomatic missions, missionary efforts, & resettlement programs. In spite of these successes & the enormous influence of these nomadic peoples, their leaders were, in general, better at warfare than administration. With the exception of the later Ottoman empire, most of these states were relatively short-lived, brought down by both internal & external pressures. 1. Turkish Migrations and Imperial Expansion A. Nomadic Economy and Society What were the effects 1) Turkish peoples were nomadic herders; organized into clans w/ of migration in the related languages post-classical era? 2) C Asia’s steppes: good for grazing, little rain, few rivers 3) Nomads & their animals; few settlements a.
[Show full text]
Karakorum Himalaya: Sourcebook for a Protected Area
7 Karakorum Himalaya: Sourcebook for a Protected Area Nigel J. R. Allan 8 The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of IUCN. IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Pakistan 1 Bath Island Road, Karachi 75530 © 1995 by IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Pakistan All rights reserved ISBN 969-8141-13-8 Contents Preface v Introduction 1 1 HISTORY Natural Heritage 11 Geology 11 Glaciology 14 Associative Cultural Landscape 17 Local Ideas and Beliefs about Mountains 17 Culturally Specific Communication Networks 20 2 DESCRIPTION AND INVENTORY Physiography and Climate 23 Flora 24 Fauna 25 Juridical and Management Qualities 29 3 PHOTOGRAPHIC AND CARTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION Historial Photographs 33 Large Format Books 33 Landscape Paintings 33 Maps and Nomenclature 34 4 PUBLIC AWARENESS Records of Expeditions 37 World Literature and History 43 Tourism 52 Scientific and Census Reports 56 Guidebooks 66 International Conflict 66 5 RELATED BIBLIOGRAPHIC MATERIALS 69 Author Index 71 Place Index 81 iii iv4 5 Preface This sourcebook for a protected area has its origins in a lecture I gave at the Environment and Policy Institute of the East-West Center in Honolulu in 1987. The lecture was about my seasons of field work in the Karakorum Himalaya. Norton Ginsberg, the director of the Institute, alerted me to the fact that the Encyclopedia Britannica would be revising their entries on Asian mountains shortly and suggested that I update the Karakorum entry. The eventual publication of that entry under my name (Allan 1992), however, omitted most of the literature references I had accumulated. As my reference list continued to expand I decided to order them in some coherent fashion and publish them as a sourcebook to coincide with the IUCN workshop on mountain protected areas in Skardu in September 1994.
[Show full text]
Scanned Using Book Scancenter 5033
I HISTORICAL PROLOGUE The Land and the People Demchugdongrob, commonly known as De Wang (Prince De in Chinese), was a thirty-first generation descendant of Chinggis Khan and the last ruler of Mongolia from the altan urag, the Golden Clan of the Chinggisids. The only son of Prince Namjilwang- chug, Demchugdongrob was bom in the Sunid Right Banner of Inner Mongolia in 1902 and died in Hohhot, the capital of the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region, in 1966. The Sunid was one of the tribes that initially supported Chinggis Khan (r. 1206- 1227). In the sixteenth century, Dayan Khan reunified Mongolia and put this tribe under the control of his eldest son, Torubolod. Thereafter, the descendants of Torubolod be came the rulers not only of the Sunid but also of the Chahar (Chakhar), Ujumuchin, and Khauchid tribes. The Chahar tribe was always under the direct control of the khan him self During the Manchu domination, the Sunid was divided into the Right Flank and Left Flank Banners, and both were part of the group of banners placed under the Shilingol League. During the first half of the seventeenth century, the Manchus expanded to the southern parts of Manchuria and began to compete with the Ming Chinese. Realizing the danger in the rise of the Manchus, Ligdan Khan, the last Mongolian Grand Khan, aban doned his people ’s traditional hostility toward the Chinese and formed an alliance with the Ming court to fight the Manchus. Although this policy was prudent, it was unaccept able to most Mongolian tribal leaders, who subsequently rebelled and joined the Manchu camp.
[Show full text]
The Rise of Steppe Agriculture
The Rise of Steppe Agriculture The Social and Natural Environment Changes in Hetao (1840s-1940s) Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philosophischen Fakultät der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Br. vorgelegt von Yifu Wang aus Taiyuan, V. R. China WS 2017/18 Erstgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Sabine Dabringhaus Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dr. Franz-Josef Brüggemeier Vorsitzender des Promotionsausschusses der Gemeinsamen Kommission der Philologischen und der Philosophischen Fakultät: Prof. Dr. Joachim Grage Datum der Disputation: 01. 08. 2018 Table of Contents List of Figures 5 Acknowledgments 1 1. Prologue 3 1.1 Hetao and its modern environmental crisis 3 1.1.1 Geographical and historical context 4 1.1.2 Natural characteristics 6 1.1.3 Beacons of nature: Recent natural disasters in Hetao 11 1.2 Aims and current state of research 18 1.3 Sources and secondary materials 27 2. From Mongol to Manchu: the initial development of steppe agriculture (1300s-1700s) 32 2.1 The Mongolian steppe during the post-Mongol empire era (1300s-1500s) 33 2.1.1 Tuntian and steppe cities in the fourteenth century 33 2.1.2 The political impact on the steppe environment during the North-South confrontation 41 2.2 Manchu-Mongolia relations in the early seventeenth century 48 2.2.1 From a military alliance to an unequal relationship 48 2.2.2 A new management system for Mongolia 51 2.2.3 Divide in order to rule: religion and the Mongolian Policy 59 2.3 The natural environmental impact of the Qing Dynasty's Mongolian policy 65 2.3.1 Agricultural production 67 2.3.2 Wild animals 68 2.3.3 Wild plants of economic value 70 1 2.3.4 Mining 72 2.4 Summary 74 3.
[Show full text]
Who Were the Mongols?
Grade 6 The Eastern Hemisphere Unit 6 Interactions Across the Eastern Hemisphere Lesson 3: Who Were the Mongols? Who Were the Mongols? Ruthless Warriors or Champions of Cultural Exchange and Global Trade? Putnam/Northern Westchester BOCES: Grade 6 Integrated Social Studies/English Language Arts Curriculum Page 1 Revised December 2014 Grade 6 The Eastern Hemisphere Unit 6 Interactions Across the Eastern Hemisphere Lesson 3: Who Were the Mongols? MONGOL WARFARE Beginning in 1206 the Mongol Empire expanded quickly under the leadership of Genghis Khan and his son, Ogedei. The Mongols first conquered Central Asia in 1222, then continued on to conquer Eastern Europe by 1240. In 1258, they successfully attacked the great Muslim city of Baghdad and conquered the Abbasids. One of the few powers that were able to stop the Mongol conquest were the Japanese. The Mongols attempted two invasions in Japan, one in 1260 and one in 1281 but both were unsuccessful. The Mongols, however, had created the largest empire ever. The Mongols were known for their fierce warfare. Genghis Khan and his generals were brilliant military planners. Although their armies were not really large (23,000 in total), they included skilled horsemen who were well known for carrying out carefully planned, coordinated attacks. They used bows made of horn, wood, and animal tendons bound together, hand axes and waterproof leather armour (covering for their bodies). The cavalry included swift riders who were capable of delivering rapid communications to the battlefront using a system of relay stations. As these tactics became ineffective when attacking walled towns, the Mongols invented new methods of warfare.
[Show full text]