Introduction to Physiological Psychology Vision

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Introduction to Physiological Psychology Vision [email protected] cogsci.ucsd.educogsci.ucsd.edu/~/~ksweeneyksweeney//psy260.htmlpsy260.html Light- a part of the spectrum of Electromagnetic Energy (the part that’s visible to us!) 1 In a vacuum, light travels at a constant speed of ~186,000 miles/sec. So if the frequency of the oscillation varies, the distance between peaks (or wavelength ) also varies. (vertical) Route within the retina Rods and Cones Bipolar Cells Ganglion Cells The axons of the ganglion cells form the optic nerve 2 Eye movement Although each fixation generates a different sensation at the level of the retina, the brain creates a single perception Yarbus, 1967 Why have two of them? Convergence :: –– eyes must turn slightly inward to focus when objects are close Binocular disparity :: –– difference between the images on the two retinas Both are greater when objects are close –– provides brain with a 33--DD image and distance information 3 Sensory neurons for vision RODS and CONES: –– Specialized neurons that respond to light with changes in their membrane potential Photoreceptors: Rods and Cones RODS :: –– ~120 million rods –– Scotopic Vision (skotos=darkness) –– Sensitive to brightness, but not color (shades of gray) 4 Photoreceptors: Rods and Cones RODS :: –– Many rods converge onto one retinal ganglion cell –– Responsible for lowlow--lightlight vision –– Not present at all in fovea Photoreceptors: Rods and Cones CONES: –– ~6 million cones –– Photopic Vision (photos=light) –– Sensitive to color 5 Photoreceptors: Rods and Cones CONES: ––A single retinal ganglion cell receives signals from one (or few) cones. –– Responsible for high acuity vision (fine detail) –– Fovea contains only cones Rods and Cones The outer segment of a photoreceptor contains hundreds of lamellae. Within the lamellae you find photopigmentsphotopigments--moleculesmolecules that contain an opsin and a retinal. (E.g(E.g.. rhodopsin )) 6 Rhodopsin Rhodopsin is a receptor that responds to light instead of to neurotransmitters (photons bind to it) When rhodopsin is exposed to light, it breaks down and the opsin bleachesbleaches.. The effect of the bleaching is a change in the release of NT –– Not the way you might think! Strange but true… The effect of light is to turn receptor cells ““OFFOFF””…… darkness turns them ““ONON””!! Remember that receptors have a spontaneous firing rate: –– They do NOT fire action potentials, but graded potentials –– The effect of receptors firing is inhibition of the bipolar cells 7 Transduction: how light becomes neural signals A cone or rod actually releases LESS neurotransmitter when stimulated by light! –– Rhodopsin molecules are bleached by light, causing hyperpolarization of rods. –– Thus, inhibition: less release of neurotransmitter (glutamate) –– Result is: depolarization of bipolar cell (= more release of neurotransmitter) –– Ganglion cell is more likely to fire (generally) The effect of a bleached photopigment… … is that a the photoreceptor ’’s membrane potential changes. ReceptorReceptor’’ss membrane potential affects release of NT onto bipolar cells. Bipolar cells ‘‘speak ’’ to ganglion cells, which bring information to the brain. 8 So in the dark …… Photoreceptors release enough NT to prevent bipolar cells from triggering ganglion cells. –– Ganglion cells, by NOT firing, report to the brain: ““nono lightlight”” And in the light? Cone and Rod Vision Distribution of rods and cones Only cones are found at the fovea!! 9 Cone and Rod Vision Less convergence in cones, increasing acuity while decreasing sensitivity More convergence in rod system, increasing sensitivity while decreasing acuity So we have a response from a ganglion cell… now what? Bundle of ganglion cell axons exiting the eye: blind spot No receptors where information exits the eye: –– Visual system uses information from cells around the blind spot for ““completion, ”” filling in the blind spot 10 From the Eyes to the Visual Cortex Lateral Geniculate Nucleus A nucleus within the thalamus ((““relay center ””) –– receives information from the retina and projects to primary visual cortex. Contains six ““layers ”” of neurons –– each layer receives information from only 1 eye. First two layers: magnocellular Next four layers: parvocellular 11 M and P channels Magnocellular –– Larger cell bodies –– Responsive to movement –– Input primarily from rods Parvocellular –– Small cell bodies –– Responsive to color, fine details –– Input primarily from cones M and P channels Layers 1, 4, 66--contracontra Layers 2, 3, 55--ipsiipsi 12 From the Eyes to the Visual Cortex The visual system is organized retinotopically: –– The left hemiretina of each eye (right visual field) connects to the right lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) –– the right hemiretina (left visual field) connects to the left LGN Coding of Visual Information 13 Coding of information in the retina For any sensory neuron, a receptive field is the ‘‘place ’’ in which a stimulus will cause the neuron to fire. The receptive fields in the fovea are smaller than in the rest of the retina. Receptive Fields Many ganglion cells have receptive fields with a centercenter--surroundsurround organization: excitatory and inhibitory regions separated by a circular boundary Some cells are ““onon-- center ”” and some are ““offoff--centercenter ”” 14 What does color get us? What does color get us? 15 Why can you visualize red (imagine a firefire-- truck)… and you can imagine a reddish yellow… but it is difficult (impossible?) to imagine a reddish green… … or a bluishbluish--yellow?!yellow?! Color Mixing vs. Pigment Mixing 16 Color vision theories Trichromatic theory: there are 3 different receptors (types of cones) in the eye, each sensitive to a single hue (red, green, blue) Color vision theories Trichromatic theory: there are 3 different receptors (types of cones) in the eye, each sensitive to a single hue (red, green, blue) –– Because Young noted that any color could be accounaccountetedd for by mixing just 3 lights in various proportions 17 Trichromatic Theory At the level of the retina, cones code for three wavelengths of light (different opsins): Short (S), Medium (M), Long (L): blue, green, red 18 19 The precise distribution of cones varies from person to person, but generally speaking ““blueblue”” sensitive cones are less common than ““redred””andand ““greengreen”” cones Image from David Williams, U of Rochester Color Blindness Protanopia: no red cones – see yellow and blue, red and green hues confused Deuteranopia: no green cones – red and green hues confused Tritanopia: blue cones lacking or faulty – world seen in reds and greens, no blue 20 Those with normal color vision should read the number 8. Those with redred--greengreen color vision deficiencies (protanopia, deuteranopia) should read the number 3. Total color blindness should not be able to read any numeral. The trichromatic theory doesn ’’t tell the whole story… 21 The trichromatic theory doesn ’’t tell the whole story… The retinal ganglion cells code for complementary colors. This is known as opponentopponent--processprocess coding Another type of ganglion cell only encodes brightness: ‘‘blackblack--whitewhite ’’ 22 Opponent Process Theory Ganglion cells –– Three types Red/green, yellow/blue, black/white –– Each cell represents an opponent process system Resting behavior in red/green cells is midmid--levellevel rate of response For R+GR+G--,, rate increases when red is present, decreases when green is present (opposite for RR--G+)G+) Yellow/blue (Y+B(Y+B--)) increases when both red and green are present, decreases when blue is present Opponent Process Theory Opposing retinal processes enable color vision ““ONON ”” ““OFF ”” red green green red blue yellow yellow blue black white white black 23 ReddishReddish--green?green? BluishBluish--Yellow?Yellow? You can ’’t imagine them because ganglion cells that signal red or green (or yellow or blue) can only increase or decrease rate of firing, they can ’’t do both at once!! 24 The complementary afterafter--effecteffect is caused by the fact that after adaptation, locations stimulated by green light will be less sensitive to green than to red, and vice versa. Since white light contains all colors and stimulates all photoreceptors equally, those that have been ““green adapted ”” will fire ‘‘redred ’’ to white light (and vice versa)versa)--aa larger ““redred ”” than ““green ”” signal will be generated. It ’’s the local imbalance between the red and green inputs to the opponent mechanism that generates the (relatively weak) color afterafter--effecteffects.s. We haven ’’t even reached the cortex yet! Primary visual cortex (Striate Cortex, V1) Visual Association cortex (extrastriate) 25 Primary Visual Cortex (V1, Striate Cortex) ~140 million neurons just in V1! Retinotopic Organization Information received at adjacent portions of the retina remains adjacent in V1. More cortex is devoted to areas of high acuity. (Just like the disproportionate representation of sensitive body parts in somatosensory cortex!) About 25% of primary visual cortex is dedicated to processing input from the fovea. 26 Striate Cortex Six principal layers of striate cortex Processing in Striate Cortex Layers 2 and 3 receive information from the parvocellular layers and koniocellular layers of the LGN. Cells are grouped together in ““blobs ”” –– Cells within blobs are sensitive to color –– Cells outside blobs are sensitive to orientation, movement, binocular
Recommended publications
  • Sensory Memory Is Allocated Exclusively to the Current Event-Segment

    Sensory Memory Is Allocated Exclusively to the Current Event-Segment

    Sensory memory is allocated exclusively to the current event-segment Item Type Article Authors Tripathy, Srimant P.; Ögmen, H. Citation Tripathy SP and Ögmen H (2018) Sensory memory is allocated exclusively to the current event-segment. Frontiers in Psychology. 9: 1435. Rights (c) 2018 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons CC-BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Download date 28/09/2021 02:42:01 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/16722 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 07 September 2018 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01435 Sensory Memory Is Allocated Exclusively to the Current Event-Segment Srimant P. Tripathy 1* and Haluk Ögmenˇ 2 1 School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Denver, Denver, CO, United States The Atkinson-Shiffrin modal model forms the foundation of our understanding of human memory. It consists of three stores (Sensory Memory (SM), also called iconic memory, Short-Term Memory (STM), and Long-Term Memory (LTM)), each tuned to a different time-scale. Since its inception, the STM and LTM components of the modal model have undergone significant modifications, while SM has remained largely unchanged, Edited by: representing a large capacity system funneling information into STM. In the laboratory, Qasim Zaidi, visual memory is usually tested by presenting a brief static stimulus and, after a delay, University at Buffalo, United States asking observers to report some aspect of the stimulus. However, under ecological Reviewed by: Ronald A. Rensink, viewing conditions, our visual system receives a continuous stream of inputs, which University of British Columbia, Canada is segmented into distinct spatio-temporal segments, called events.
  • Photopic and Scotopic – the “Eyes” Have It

    Photopic and Scotopic – the “Eyes” Have It

    Photopic and Scotopic – The “eyes” have it Dick Erdmann GE Specification Engineer In the human eye the perceived brightness of illumination depends of color. It takes more energy in the blue or red portion of the color spectrum to create the same sensation of brightness as in the yellow-green region. When it comes to sensing light in the human eye there are two main light-sensing cells called rods and cones. If one took a tube and looked straight ahead through it so that it allowed the field of view to be restricted 2 degrees, light photons would fall on the part of the eye called the fovea that consists mainly of cones. The peripheral area surrounding the fovea consists of both rods and cones with the rods outnumbering the cones about 10:1. Cones have a peak response in the yellow-green region of about 555 nano-meters and rods have a peak response in the bluish-green area of about 505 nano-meters. Because both the rods and cones have been shown to have different sensitivities to colors they can be represented by two different sensitivity curves called Photopic Curves (representing the cone) and Scotopic Curves (representing the rod). Years ago it was thought that the cones were responsible for daytime vision and rods for nighttime vision. Because of this, light meters that measure lighting levels such as footcandles, lumens, lux, etc. are weighted to the cone activated part of the eye ignoring the effect of rod-activated vision. But according to a study by Dr. Sam Berman and Dr.
  • A New Conceptualization of Human Visual Sensory-Memory

    A New Conceptualization of Human Visual Sensory-Memory

    HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY published: 09 June 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00830 A New Conceptualization of Human Visual Sensory-Memory Haluk Ögmen˘ 1, 2* and Michael H. Herzog 3 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA, 2 Center for Neuro-Engineering and Cognitive Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA, 3 Laboratory of Psychophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland Memory is an essential component of cognition and disorders of memory have significant individual and societal costs. The Atkinson–Shiffrin “modal model” forms the foundation of our understanding of human memory. It consists of three stores: Sensory Memory (SM), whose visual component is called iconic memory, Short-Term Memory (STM; also called working memory, WM), and Long-Term Memory (LTM). Since its inception, shortcomings of all three components of the modal model have been identified. While the theories of STM and LTM underwent significant modifications to address these shortcomings, models of the iconic memory remained largely unchanged: A high capacity but rapidly decaying store whose contents are encoded in retinotopic coordinates, i.e., according to how the stimulus is projected on the retina. The fundamental shortcoming of iconic memory models is that, because contents are encoded in retinotopic coordinates, the iconic memory cannot hold any useful information under normal viewing conditions Edited by: when objects or the subject are in motion. Hence, half-century after its formulation, it Britt Anderson, remains an unresolved problem whether and how the first stage of the modal model University of Waterloo, Canada serves any useful function and how subsequent stages of the modal model receive Reviewed by: inputs from the environment.
  • Perceptually-Motivated Graphics, Visualization and 3D Displays

    Perceptually-Motivated Graphics, Visualization and 3D Displays

    Perceptually-Motivated Graphics, Visualization and 3D Displays Ann McNamara∗ Department of Visualization Texas A&M University Katerina Mania† Department of Electronic & Computer Engineering Technical University of Crete Marty Banks‡ Visual Space Perception Laboratory University of California, Berkeley Christopher Healey§ Department of Computer Science North Carolina State University May 18, 2010 ∗[email protected][email protected][email protected] §[email protected] Abstract This course presents timely, relevant examples on how researchers have leveraged perceptual information for optimization of rendering algorithms, to better guide design and presentation in (3D stereoscopic) display media, and for improved visualization of complex or large data sets. Each presentation will provide ref- erences and short overviews of cutting-edge current research pertaining to that area. We will ensure that the most up-to-date research examples are presented by sourcing information from recent perception and graphics conferences and journals such as ACM Transactions on Perception, paying particular attention work presented at the 2010 Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. About the Lecturers Ann McNamara Department of Visualization Texas A&M University 3137 TAMU College Station, TX 77843-3137 +1-979-845-4715 [email protected] http://www.viz.tamu.edu/people/ann Ann McNamara received her undergraduate and graduate degrees from the Uni- versity of Bristol, UK. Anns research focuses on the advancement of computer graphics and scientific visualization through novel approaches for optimizing an individuals experience when creating, viewing and interacting with virtual spaces. She investigates new ways to exploit knowledge of human visual per- ception to produce high quality computer graphics and animations more effi- ciently.
  • Visual Awareness Is Essential for Grouping Based on Mirror Symmetry

    Visual Awareness Is Essential for Grouping Based on Mirror Symmetry

    S S symmetry Article Visual Awareness Is Essential for Grouping Based on Mirror Symmetry Dina Devyatko 1,* and Ruth Kimchi 1,2,* 1 Institute of Information Processing and Decision Making, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel 2 Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] (D.D.); [email protected] (R.K.) Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 10 November 2020; Published: 13 November 2020 Abstract: We examined whether symmetry-based grouping can take place in the absence of visual awareness. To this end, we used a priming paradigm, sandwich masking as an invisibility-inducing method, and primes and targets composed of two vertical symmetric or asymmetric lines. The target could be congruent or incongruent with the prime in symmetry. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with masked primes and clearly visible targets. In each trial, the participants performed a two-alternative discrimination task on the target, and then rated the visibility of the prime on a subjective visibility four-point scale (used to assess prime awareness). Subjectively invisible primes failed to produce response priming, suggesting that symmetry processing might depend on visual awareness. However, participants barely saw the prime, and the results for the visible primes were inconclusive, even when we used a conservative criterion for awareness. To rule out the possibility that our prime stimuli could not produce priming per se, we conducted a control visibility experiment (Experiment 2), in which participants were presented with unmasked, clearly visible primes and performed a target task. The results showed that our primes could elicit significant response priming when visible.
  • Transmission of Scotopic Signals from the Rod to Rod-Bipolar Cell in the Mammalian Retina

    Transmission of Scotopic Signals from the Rod to Rod-Bipolar Cell in the Mammalian Retina

    Vision Research 44 (2004) 3269–3276 www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Transmission of scotopic signals from the rod to rod-bipolar cell in the mammalian retina W. Rowland Taylor a,*, Robert G. Smith b a Neurological Sciences Institute, Oregon Health and Sciences University––West Campus, 505 NW 185th Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97006, United States b Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA Received 15 June 2004; received in revised form 27 July 2004 Abstract Mammals can see at low scotopic light levels where only 1 rod in several thousand transduces a photon. The single photon signal is transmitted to the brain by the ganglion cell, which collects signals from more than 1000 rods to provide enough amplification. If the system were linear, such convergence would increase the neural noise enough to overwhelm the tiny rod signal. Recent studies provide evidence for a threshold nonlinearity in the rod to rod bipolar synapse, which removes much of the background neural noise. We argue that the height of the threshold should be 0.85 times the amplitude of the single photon signal, consistent with the saturation observed for the single photon signal. At this level, the rate of false positive events due to neural noise would be masked by the higher rate of dark thermal events. The evidence presented suggests that this synapse is optimized to transmit the single photon signal at low scotopic light levels. Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Retina; Synaptic transmission; Single photon; Photoreceptor; Visual threshold; Scotopic vision 1. Introduction produced by single photons are carried by only a few neurons, whereas all the rods and postreceptoral Many mammals have evolved excellent night vision, neurons in the pool generate noise.
  • Technical Restrictions of Computer-Manipulated Visual Stimuli and Display Units for Studying Animal Behaviour Sebastian A

    Technical Restrictions of Computer-Manipulated Visual Stimuli and Display Units for Studying Animal Behaviour Sebastian A

    Ethology CURRENT ISSUES – PERSPECTIVES AND REVIEWS Technical Restrictions of Computer-Manipulated Visual Stimuli and Display Units for Studying Animal Behaviour Sebastian A. Baldauf, Harald Kullmann & Theo C. M. Bakker Institute for Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany Correspondence Abstract Sebastian A. Baldauf, Institute for Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, University of Bonn, Computer-manipulated visual stimuli are a well-established tool to An der Immenburg 1, D-53121 Bonn, experimentally study animal behaviour. They provide the opportunity Germany. to manipulate single or combined visual stimuli selectively, while other E-mail: [email protected] potentially confounding variables remain constant. A wide array of dif- ferent presentation methods of artificial stimuli has been used in recent Received: February 3, 2008 research. Furthermore, a wide range of basic hardware and software has Initial acceptance: March 17, 2008 Final acceptance: March 19, 2008 been used to conduct experiments. The outcomes of experimental trials (J. Kotiaho) using computer-manipulated visual stimuli differed among studies. Fail- ing or contradictory results were mostly discussed in a behavioural and doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01520.x ecological context. However, the results sometimes may be basically flawed due to methodological traps in the experimental design. Based on characteristics and restrictions of technical standards, we discuss which kinds of computer stimuli and visual display units are available today and their suitability for experimental trials when studying animal behaviour. A computer-manipulated stimulus displayed by a certain visual display unit may be accurate to investigate behaviour in a specific species, if various preconditions are met.
  • Timbre Memory, Familiarity and Dissimilarity

    Timbre Memory, Familiarity and Dissimilarity

    Timbre Memory, Familiarity and Dissimilarity Lap Ian Lou Music Technology Area Department of Music Research Schulich School of Music McGill University Montreal, Canada June 2017 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. © 2017 Lap Ian Lou i Abstract This study examines the effect of timbre memory decay on the perception of timbre dissimilarity in tones equalized in pitch, loudness and duration. This study makes two hypotheses: (1) the perception of timbre dissimilarity changes as retention interval (RI) increases; (2) timbre familiarity minimizes the perceptual change of timbre dissimilarity with increasing RI. Two experiments were conducted to test these hypotheses. In the first experiment, participants rated the dissimilarity of synthetic tone pairs with RIs of 0.5 s, 5 s and 10 s. In the second experiment, participants rated the dissimilarity of pairs of synthetic tones, digital transformations of acoustic sounds or acoustic instrument sounds with five RIs between 0.5 s and 5 s. The results of the two experiments show that participants perceive similar pairs as significantly more dissimilar as RI increases, particularly for highly unfamiliar synthetic tones, that RI has less of an effect on more dissimilar pairs, and that timbre familiarity minimizes the RI effect on dissimilarity ratings. ii Résumé Cette étude examine l’effet du déclin de la mémoire du timbre sur la perception de dissemblance entre timbres pour des sons égalisés en termes de la hauteur, de la sonie et de la durée. Cette étude fait deux hypothèses: (1) la perception de dissemblance du timbre change lorsque l’intervalle de rétention (IR) augmente; (2) le caractère familier de timbre minimise le changement perceptif de dissemblance avec une augmentation de l’IR.
  • Comparative Visual Function in Predatory Fishes from the Indian River Lagoon Author(S): D

    Comparative Visual Function in Predatory Fishes from the Indian River Lagoon Author(S): D

    Comparative Visual Function in Predatory Fishes from the Indian River Lagoon Author(s): D. Michelle McComb, Stephen M. Kajiura, Andrij Z. Horodysky, and Tamara M. Frank Source: Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, Vol. 86, No. 3 (May/June 2013), pp. 285-297 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/670260 . Accessed: 16/07/2013 16:00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 152.3.102.242 on Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:00:41 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 285 Comparative Visual Function in Predatory Fishes from the Indian River Lagoon D. Michelle McComb1,* Introduction Stephen M. Kajiura2 Teleost fishes represent a speciose vertebrate lineage that ra- Andrij Z. Horodysky3 diated into distinct aquatic habitats that present unique diver- Tamara M. Frank4 gent light qualities (Jerlov 1968). Selective pressure on the pi- 1Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute at Florida Atlantic scine eye has resulted in an extensive array of both 2 University, Fort Pierce, Florida 34946; Biological Sciences, morphological and physiological adaptations to maximize vi- Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida 33431; sual function under differing light conditions.
  • Radiometric and Photometric Measurements with TAOS Photosensors Contributed by Todd Bishop March 12, 2007 Valid

    Radiometric and Photometric Measurements with TAOS Photosensors Contributed by Todd Bishop March 12, 2007 Valid

    TAOS Inc. is now ams AG The technical content of this TAOS application note is still valid. Contact information: Headquarters: ams AG Tobelbaderstrasse 30 8141 Unterpremstaetten, Austria Tel: +43 (0) 3136 500 0 e-Mail: [email protected] Please visit our website at www.ams.com NUMBER 21 INTELLIGENT OPTO SENSOR DESIGNER’S NOTEBOOK Radiometric and Photometric Measurements with TAOS PhotoSensors contributed by Todd Bishop March 12, 2007 valid ABSTRACT Light Sensing applications use two measurement systems; Radiometric and Photometric. Radiometric measurements deal with light as a power level, while Photometric measurements deal with light as it is interpreted by the human eye. Both systems of measurement have units that are parallel to each other, but are useful for different applications. This paper will discuss the differencesstill and how they can be measured. AG RADIOMETRIC QUANTITIES Radiometry is the measurement of electromagnetic energy in the range of wavelengths between ~10nm and ~1mm. These regions are commonly called the ultraviolet, the visible and the infrared. Radiometry deals with light (radiant energy) in terms of optical power. Key quantities from a light detection point of view are radiant energy, radiant flux and irradiance. SI Radiometryams Units Quantity Symbol SI unit Abbr. Notes Radiant energy Q joule contentJ energy radiant energy per Radiant flux Φ watt W unit time watt per power incident on a Irradiance E square meter W·m−2 surface Energy is an SI derived unit measured in joules (J). The recommended symbol for energy is Q. Power (radiant flux) is another SI derived unit. It is the derivative of energy with respect to time, dQ/dt, and the unit is the watt (W).
  • History of Cognitive Psychological Memory Research

    History of Cognitive Psychological Memory Research

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333701129 History of Cognitive Psychological Memory Research Chapter · June 2019 DOI: 10.1017/9781108290876 CITATIONS READS 0 3,810 2 authors: Henry Roediger Jeremy K. Yamashiro Washington University in St. Louis University of California, Santa Cruz 331 PUBLICATIONS 33,867 CITATIONS 14 PUBLICATIONS 115 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Question Order Effects on Quizzes View project Socially Distributed Remembering View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jeremy K. Yamashiro on 17 June 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. HISTORY OF MEMORY RESEARCH 1 History of Psychological Approaches to Studying Memory Henry L. Roediger, III and Jeremy K. Yamashiro Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences Washington University in St. Louis Correspondence to: Henry L. Roediger, III Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Campus Box 1125 Washington University in St. Louis One Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130-4899 U.S.A. e-mail: [email protected] HISTORY OF MEMORY RESEARCH 2 Introduction Writings about memory date to the earliest written word, and doubtless people wondered about their memories for centuries before they were able to write down their observations. Aristotle and Plato wrote about memory in ways that seem surprisingly modern even today, although of course in the wisdom of hindsight many of their claims are off the mark. For example, Aristotle thought that the heart was the seat of learning, memory, and intelligence and that the brain existed to cool the heart.
  • Color Vision and Night Vision Chapter Dingcai Cao 10

    Color Vision and Night Vision Chapter Dingcai Cao 10

    Retinal Diagnostics Section 2 For additional online content visit http://www.expertconsult.com Color Vision and Night Vision Chapter Dingcai Cao 10 OVERVIEW ROD AND CONE FUNCTIONS Day vision and night vision are two separate modes of visual Differences in the anatomy and physiology (see Chapters 4, perception and the visual system shifts from one mode to the Autofluorescence imaging, and 9, Diagnostic ophthalmic ultra- other based on ambient light levels. Each mode is primarily sound) of the rod and cone systems underlie different visual mediated by one of two photoreceptor classes in the retina, i.e., functions and modes of visual perception. The rod photorecep- cones and rods. In day vision, visual perception is primarily tors are responsible for our exquisite sensitivity to light, operat- cone-mediated and perceptions are chromatic. In other words, ing over a 108 (100 millionfold) range of illumination from near color vision is present in the light levels of daytime. In night total darkness to daylight. Cones operate over a 1011 range of vision, visual perception is rod-mediated and perceptions are illumination, from moonlit night light levels to light levels that principally achromatic. Under dim illuminations, there is no are so high they bleach virtually all photopigments in the cones. obvious color vision and visual perceptions are graded varia- Together the rods and cones function over a 1014 range of illu- tions of light and dark. Historically, color vision has been studied mination. Depending on the relative activity of rods and cones, as the salient feature of day vision and there has been emphasis a light level can be characterized as photopic (cones alone on analysis of cone activities in color vision.