Impacts of Predation on Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail Dale Rollins Texas A&M University, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impacts of Predation on Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail Dale Rollins Texas A&M University, D-Rollins@Tamu.Edu University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Natural Resources Natural Resources, School of 2001 Impacts of predation on northern bobwhite and scaled quail Dale Rollins Texas A&M University, [email protected] John P. Carroll University of Georgia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Other Environmental Sciences Commons Rollins, Dale and Carroll, John P., "Impacts of predation on northern bobwhite and scaled quail" (2001). Papers in Natural Resources. 651. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/651 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Natural Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SPECIALCOVERAGE 39 mpacts of predation on ,! orthern bobwhite and caled quail Nrthen bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) and scaled quail (Callipepla squamata) populations have declined throughout most of their distribution, and these declines have become more dramatic in recent years. In this review, we examine the role of predation in quail management. Predation is the major source of nest loss and of mortality for young and adult quail. Mean nest success across studies reviewed was 28%. Estimates of annual survival rates have varied from 5 to 26% for radiotelemetry studies and from 15 to 30% based on age-ratio studies. Breeding season survival esti- mates ranged from 13 to 51%in telemetry studies reviewed. Brood survival is the least studied aspect of quail survival;estimates ranged from 13 to 47%. Mammalian predators most often implicated in nest predation include striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), raccoons (Procyon lotor), opossums (Didelphis virginianus), foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus and Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans), and feral hogs (Sus scrofa). Accipiters (Accipiter spp.) and northern harriers (Circus cya- neus) are the most common avian predators of quail. Less information is available to assess impact of predation on scaled quail, but observations from areas where bob- whites and scaled quail are sympatric suggested that scaled quail are less vulnerable to predation than bobwhites. Although quail have adapted to cope with high preda- tion rates (e.g., renesting, large clutches), populations in some areas may be sup- pressed by predation. Changes in land use, management practices, and predator communities interact to depress quail populations over much of the bobwhite's range. Additional studies are needed to assess the role of predation and predation management in light of these landscape-level changes. A variation of the Integrated Pest Management philosophy used in crop production is proposed as an appropriate model to address predation management for quail. Key Words avian recruitment, Callipepla squamata, Colinus virginianus, game birds, Integrated Pest Management, mesomammals, northern bobwhite, population regula- tion, predation, raptors, scaled quail ecse of theirrelatively small size and the fact thatthey ment suggestthat predators are rarelya managementcon- | ."-'' theirentire lives on the ground,various species of cern and thatpredation should be managedonly indirectly R qui s(Odontophoridae)are extremelyvulnerable to pre- (e.g., habitatmanagement; Errington 1934). Hereinwe ii mn.However, prevailing paradigms in quailmanage- reviewthe evidencerelative to the impactsof predation Address for Dale Rollins: Texas Agricultural Extension Service, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 7887 U.S. Highway 87, San Angelo, TX 76901-9714, USA; e-mail: [email protected]. Address for John P. Carroll: Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA; e-mail: [email protected]. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2001, 29(1):39-51 Peer refereed .......... 40 Wildlife Society, Bulletin 2001, 29(1):39-51 on northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus, hereafter quail trends vary among ecoregions (Peterson and Perez bobwhite) and scaled quail (Callipepla squamata) as 2000). Bobwhite populations in the Rolling Plains and models for North American species. For bobwhites, we South Texas Plains ecoregions have remained relatively focus our discussion primarily on the eastern and western stable, but roadside counts in 2000 were the lowest since peripheries of the range, i.e., the southeastern United counts began for the Gulf Prairies and Marshes, Cross States and Texas, respectively, because bobwhite abun- Timbers and Prairies, and Edwards Plateau ecoregions x Parks and Wildlife (Texas 2000).J- We do not discount the current managemtent para- digm of indirect predator control (i.e., halbitat man- Scaled quail However, the issue of ion as it Scaled quail range over most of agement).... predati the Chihuahuandesert, including relates to quail must be evaluated in a moire contem- portions of Arizona, Colorado, porary context of an increasingly fragmenited land- Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, in and Texas. Scaled quail populations scape...and temporal changes predator populations. ^havedeclined significantly (from -3.8%/yr from 1966 to 1991 to dance typically declines along a west-to-east gradient. -8.2%/yr from 1982 to 1996) throughouttheir range, We also identify areas where additional research is need- especially during the last 15 years (Brennan 1993; Church ed and offer a more contemporary philosophy of preda- et al. 1993; Schemnitz 1993, 1994; Peterson and Perez tion management for quail, which is based on the philos- 2000; Rollins 2000; Sauer et al. 2000). Scaled quail ophy of Integrated Pest Management. populations experienced a drastic, inexplicable decline about 1989 over much of their range in Oklahoma and Current status of bobwhite north Texas (Rollins 2000). Populations in the Oklahoma panhandle declined 50% from 1956 to 1991 (Schemnitz and scaled quail 1993), and scaled quail essentially disappearedalong the Bobwhites eastern periphery of its range, where they were common The decline of the bobwhite in the southeastern United to abundantin 1987 (Rollins 2000). Data from the Breed- States (U.S.) is well documented (reviewed by Brennan ing Bird Survey (Sauer et al. 2000) and the Texas Parks 1999). Bobwhite populations declined -2.8%/year from and Wildlife Department (2000) documented this demise 1966 to 1999 (P<0.01) across its range according to (Figure 2). Relative to the Southeast, land-use changes Breeding Bird Survey data (Sauer et al. 2000, Figure 1). have been less dramatic in scaled quail range, which is The decline of bobwhites is correlated generally with dominated largely by livestock grazing. dramatic changes in land use throughout the region over the last 80 years. The shift away from a landscape domi- Factors to nated rather diverse and in the contributing quail by low-impact agriculture declines early twentieth century to landscapes dominated by hard- population wood forests and intensive pine silviculture in the latter Aside from the possible impacts of predation and twentieth century reduced habitability for bobwhites. In land-use changes, other factors may be involved in the more recent dramatic in times, changes agriculturalprac- 50 - tices (e.g., clean farming, increased use of pesticides) also x may have contributed to poorer quality or quantity 0 of remaining habitats. In any event, a landscape that i A-AA A and of is 'A -A A. supported large widespread populations quail 0 it A A now gone. Presently, bobwhite populations over most of AA.A A-A ,..., A A A 0 .A', il~~~~Cr'd A. A.A the Southeast seem to be generally at much lesser levels "3 AA.h - and very fragmented (Brennan 1999). Although bobwhite densities are generally greater at 0 .......... I I. I I I . I I. I I I . I I . I I , ~~, the western periphery of their range (e.g., Texas), their 67 71 75 79 83 87 91 95 abundance there has declined at a rate of since -4.7/year Year 1981 (Sauer et al. 2000). The Texas population's trend is 1. Northern bobwhite abundance in the southeastern U.S. (dot- essentially parallel to that of populations in the Southeast Figure ted line) and Texas (solid line) according to Breeding Bird Survey data, (Figure 1). Bobwhites occur over most of Texas, but 1966-99 (Sauer et al. 2000). Predators and quail * Rollins and Carroll 41 declineof bobwhiteand scaled Table1. Nest success rates(%) and percentageof mortalitieslost to predatorsof bobwhitenests at var- ious locations. quailpopulations. Other factors believedto be to contributing Nest Methodof Lostto the declineof quail in the Location n success (%) monitoring predators(%) Reference Southeast fromfire ants range Illinois 863 34 Nest searching 37 Roseberryand Klimstra(1975) (Solenopsis spp.) to acid rain Florida 601 36 Nest searching 64 Stoddard(1931) (Brennan1999). However,there Florida 51 45 Telemetry 89 DeVosand Mueller(1993) also is ampleevidence that bob- Georgia 1,725 18 Nest searching - Simpson(1976) white populationsin some areas Missouri 157 44 Telemetry 68 Burgeret al. (1995b) of the Southeastare being main- NorthCarolina 35 34 Telemetry 73 Puckettet al. (1995) Oklahoma 161 50 76 et al. tainedat densities, Telemetry Peoples (1996) high espe- Tennessee 766 23 Nest search - Dimmick(1974) in the cially plantationregions Texas(north) 34 12 Nest search 88 Jackson(1947) of southernGeorgia
Recommended publications
  • Birds of Perry County Contact Us the Tell City Ranger District of the Hoosier National Forest Is Open 8-4:30 Monday Through Friday to Serve Visitors
    Birds of Perry County Contact Us The Tell City Ranger District of the Hoosier National Forest is open 8-4:30 Monday through Friday to serve visitors. Tell City Ranger District 248 15th Street Tell City, IN 47586 812-547-7051 Federal relay system for the deaf and hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339 website: www.fs.usda.gov/hoosier Great Bllue Heron Tufted Titmouse __________________________ vV USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. America’s Great Outdoors Last updated 11/2011 Forest Service United States Department of Agriculture The third and fourth columns are the genus and Using the Checklist species of the bird. The fifth column shows the The first column after the bird’s common name is bird’s status in Indiana as of 2009. (Available at http:// evidence of the bird’s breeding status in our area. www.in.gov/dnr/fishwild/files/Birds_Of_Indiana.pdf) CO = Confirmed breeding evidence FC = Federal Candidate FE = Federal Endangered PR = Probable breeding evidence FT = Federal Threatened SC - State Special Concern PO = Possible breeding evidence SE = State Endangered X = Exotic/Introduced OB = Observed, no breeding evidence Bird abundance will vary seasonally, and often from This shows highest breeding evidence value from year-to-year as well. Actual abundance is often dis- published 1985-1990 breeding bird atlas data and tinct from detectability. Some species may be com- draft 2005-2010 atlas data. (Available at http://www. mon but secretive and only rarely seen. Others may pwrc.usgs.gov/bba/) be numerically sparse, yet highly
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma
    P-1054 Research Summary: Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources Oklahoma State University Research Summary: Evaluation of Northern Bobwhite and Scaled Quail in Western Oklahoma Researchers involved in this study included: Kent Andersson Senior Research Specialist Eric Thacker Post-Doctoral Researcher Matt Carroll, PhD Evan Tanner, PhD Jeremy Orange, MS Rachel Carroll, MS Cameron Duquette, MS Craig Davis Professor and Bollenbach Chair in Wildlife Management Sam Fuhlendorf Professor and Groendyke Chair in Wildlife Conservation Dwayne Elmore Extension Wildlife Specialist, Professor and Bollenbach Chair in Wildlife Management Introduction Results and Implications There are two species of native quail that occur Survival in Oklahoma, the northern bobwhite (hereafter bobwhite), and the scaled quail (or blue quail). During the study, 1,051 mortalities were Both of these species are popular with hunters and recorded at Packsaddle Wildlife Management landowners. Due to a concern about declining Area. Forty-four percent were attributed to quail populations in the state, a cooperative quail mammals, 33 percent to raptors, 9 percent to study between Oklahoma State University and the hunter harvest, 5 percent to unknown predation, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation 3 percent to weather exposure and 7 percent to was conducted on the Packsaddle and Beaver miscellaneous causes. River Wildlife Management Areas from 2011- At Beaver River Wildlife Management Area, 2017. Broadly, the project was intended to 929 mortalities were recorded. Forty-seven document survival, nest success, brood success, percent were attributed to mammals, 27 percent habitat selection, genetics and movement of quail.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for Northern Bobwhite
    Species Status Assessment Class: Birds Family: Odontophoridae Scientific Name: Colinus virginianus Common Name: Northern bobwhite Species synopsis: Northern bobwhites breed and winter in New York—the northern extent of the range—where they occur in open, early-successional habitats and farmland. Northern bobwhite is a game species with an open season. Individuals were released in western New York in the 1930s and 1950s, though the influence of these introductions is unclear (McGowan 2008). Two subspecies, mexicanus and marilandicus, occurred historically in New York, with the former arriving from the west and the latter from the south. The populations within the original ranges of these subspecies are now heterogenous and the species is considered binomial. Northern bobwhites have been declining at an alarming rate for the past 40 years across their range. Breeding Bird Survey data show significant long-term (1966-2010) and short-term (2000- 2010) declines of -3.8% and -4.0% per year respectively for the United States, and -5.1% and -5.3% respectively for the Eastern region. Long-term and short-term BBS trends for New York are significant and declining as well, at -7.3% and -6.4% respectively, though caution is warranted because of small sample sizes. Christmas Bird Count data have documented fewer than 15 individuals in total since the 2006-07 season (McGowan 2007, 2011). Currently in New York, populations of wild, self-sustaining quail are restricted to Long Island. A long-term call-count survey in Suffolk County conducted since 1979 shows a precipitous decline in this region from an annual average of 101 calling males in the 1980s, to 41 calling males in the 1990s, and 10 calling males over the past 12 years.
    [Show full text]
  • §Carlieid Oula~ Rl by Sheldon Dingle
    §CArLIEID OUlA~ rL by Sheldon Dingle TRAINING RECORDS AND CASSETTE TAPES PRODUCED TO BRING RESULTS A true denizen of the desert is the this. Lack of moisture probably weakens Scaled Quail (Callipepla squamata}, the the adult birds because of poor diet. They only native gallinaceous bird in the great don't come into breeding condition. arid interior of Mexico. It is a good look­ Second, if the quail do lay a few eggs, the ing bird, rather quiet and dignified in its extremely dry weather does not provide Mail Order Price is $7.98 for each item. colors. Leopold, in Wildlife of Mexico, enough humidity to hatch them, and We pay pootage. Send check to: Eagle Records, P.O. Box 1102, Burbank, CA. describes it: third, the drought reduces the amcunt of 91507. Be sure to state color and size Pale gray with a tufted whitish seeds, greens, and insects that the young ofT-Shirt. cresh. Head and neck brownish quail need to survive. gray, paler on throat. Fore back, If the quail have one dry season it sides, and chest steel gray, each sharply reduces their numbers since feather bordered with black, giving quail populations have a forty to eighty ~d.t·'}%\ a scaled effect. Underparts buffy percent "turnover" each year. Hence all \ \ ... ,;_ l ,\.;.;._ gray, the breast feathers scaled, of the birds found the winter after a all ventral body feathers with a drought will be adults and many of them SMin~~~- -- brown streak along the shaft. will die before next breeding season. As in many species of quail, the colors The chief food of Scaled Quail is seed.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Field Management Practices on Northern Bobwhite Habitat
    Effects of Field Management Practices on Northern Bobwhite Habitat John P. Gruchy1, University of Tennessee, Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries 2143 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996 Craig A. Harper, University of Tennessee, Department of Forestry, Wildlife, and Fisheries 2143 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996 Abstract: Native grasses and forbs have been promoted in conservation programs to enhance habitat for northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus). How- ever, high seeding rates and a lack of management result in vegetative structure that is less than optimal. We implemented six management practices (November disk, March disk, March burn, March mowing, strip-herbicide application, and September burn) with a control on an unmanaged field of planted native warm-season grass in East Tennessee, 2003–2004, to evaluate effects on habitat for northern bobwhite. We recorded vegetation compo- sition, vegetation structure, and biomass of invertebrate orders preferred by bobwhite broods, 2004–2005. Disking treatments increased coverage of bobwhite food plants and reduced planted native grass cover. Disking and burning treatments enhanced vertical cover and openness at ground level and decreased litter in the season after treatment. March burning increased native grass cover and decreased undesirable grass cover. Structural and compositional variables did not differ between March mowing and control throughout the study. No treatment differences were observed in inverte- brate biomass. We recommend burning and disking regimes
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Bobwhite Colinus Virginianus Photo by SC DNR
    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus Photo by SC DNR Contributor (2005): Billy Dukes (SCDNR) Reviewed and Edited (2012): Billy Dukes (SCDNR) DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description In 1748, Catesby gave the Bobwhite quail the name Perdix sylvestris virginiana. In 1758, Linnaeus dropped the generic name Perdix and substituted Tetrao. The generic name Colinus was first used by Goldfuss in 1820 and, despite several ensuing name changes, became the accepted nomenclature (Rosene 1984). Bobwhite quail are members of the family Odontophoridae, the New World quail. Bobwhite quail are predominantly reddish-brown, with lesser amounts of white, brown, gray and black throughout. Both sexes have a dark stripe that originates at the beak and runs through the eye to the base of the skull. In males, the stripe above and below the eye is white, as is the throat patch. In females, this stripe and throat patch are light brown or tan. Typical weights for Bobwhites in South Carolina range from 160 to 180 g (5.6 to 6.3 oz.). Overall length throughout the range of the species is between 240 and 275 mm (9.5 and 10.8 in.) (Rosene 1984). Status Bobwhite quail are still widely distributed throughout their historic range. However, North American Breeding Bird Survey data indicate a significant range-wide decline of 3.8% annually between the years 1966 and 2009 (Sauer et al. 2004). In South Carolina, quail populations have declined at a rate of 6.1% annually since 1966 (Sauer et al. 2011). While not on the Partners in Flight Watch List, the concern for Northern Bobwhite is specifically mentioned Figure 1: Average summer distribution of northern bobwhite quail due to significant population declines 1994-2003.
    [Show full text]
  • ROLLINS, D. 1980. Comparative Ecology of Bobwhite and Scaled Quail In
    f.OMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBWHITE AND SCALED QUAIL IN MESQUITE GRASSLAND HABITATS By Dale ,Ro, 11 ins Bachelor of Science Southwestern Oklahoma State University Weatherford, Oklahoma 1977 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 1980 COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBWHITE AND SCALED QUAIL IN MESQUITE GRASSLAND HABITATS Thesis Approved: _ _....,...__ Y~-~d~Jt~~--'---· __ - ~~/} Dean of the Graduate ~~~---=·-College 1063274 ii PREFACE This study was conducted to provide information on several aspects of the ecology of sympatric bobwhite and scaled quail in southwest Oklahoma. The information provided herein should enable biologists to better understand the effects of interspecific competition between these 2 game species. Funds for this project were provided in part by the Oklahoma State University Resources Institute in conjunction with the Oklahoma Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit. The 3 chapters of this thesis were prepared according to the formats of 3 scientific journals. Each chapter is complete in itself and requires no supportive material. Chapter I is in the format of the Journal of Wildlife Management. Chapter ir follows' the format of the Journal of Wildlife Diseases and Chapter III follows the format of The Southwestern Naturalist. I express appreciation to my major adviser, Dr. John S. Barclay, for his assistance during the proposal and planning stages of this project, and for his advice and cotmnents throughout the duration of the study. I am grateful to Dr. John A. Bissonette, Dr. Stanley F. Fox, Dr. Thomas A. Gavin; and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Grant Report California Quail
    Grant Report California Quail Translocation from Idaho to Texas California Quail: Translocation from Idaho to Texas Final Report September 2020 Prepared by: Kelly S. Reyna, Jeffrey G. Whitt, Sarah A. Currier, Shelby M. Perry, Garrett T. Rushing, Jordan T. Conley, Curt A. Vandenberg, and Erin L. Moser. The Quail Research Laboratory, College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Texas A&M University Commerce 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF FIGURES AND TABLES ................................................................................ 3 BRIEF: ................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 7 RESEARCH GOALS .................................................................................................... 8 PREDATOR IMPACTS ON TRANSLOCATED QUAIL ........................................................... 8 PREDATOR AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR OF TRANSLOCATED QUAIL ...................................... 8 IMPACTS OF TEXAS HEAT ON VALLEY QUAIL DEVELOPMENT ........................................... 9 DEVELOPMENTAL TRAJECTORY OF CALIFORNIA VALLEY QUAIL .................................... 10 TRANSLOCATION WEIGHT LOSS ................................................................................ 10 PROJECT DESIGN............................................................................................... 11 MATERIAL AND METHODS ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Lead Poisoning from Ammunition Sources in Terrestrial Birds
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 131 (2006) 421– 432 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon A review of lead poisoning from ammunition sources in terrestrial birds Ian J. Fishera,*, Deborah J. Paina, Vernon G. Thomasb aRoyal Society for the Protection of Birds, International Department, The Lodge, Potton Road, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, United Kingdom bDepartment of Zoology, Axelrod Building, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ont., Canada N1G 2WI ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Poisoning from lead shot in waterbirds has been well documented globally and, in some Received 7 October 2005 countries, legislation exists to combat lead toxicosis at wetlands and/or in waterbirds. Received in revised form However, poisoning of terrestrial species such as raptors and upland game birds, while 20 February 2006 of potential conservation concern, remains largely to be addressed. For several species, Accepted 28 February 2006 shot are not the only ammunition source of lead, as bullet fragments can be ingested from Available online 5 June 2006 hunter-killed animal carcasses and gut piles left in the field. This review collates the cur- rent knowledge of lead poisoning from ammunition in non-waterbirds. Fifty-nine terres- Keywords: trial bird species have so far been documented to have ingested lead or suffered lead Bullet fragment poisoning from ammunition sources, including nine Globally Threatened or Near Threa- Game bird tened species. We discuss the conservation significance of continued lead use, and detail Lead shot measures needed to combat lead poisoning. Raptor Ó 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction occur following exposure to very elevated lead concentra- tions, such as may be found in the vicinity of mines, waste Lead has long been recognised as a poison to living organ- dumps, and industrial plants (Blus et al., 1977; Custer and isms, with negative effects on general health, reproduction, Mulhern, 1983; Henny et al., 1991, 1994; Garcı´a-Ferna´ndez behaviour, and potentially leading to death.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey, Grouse, Bobwhite & Pheasant Wildlife Chapter Template
    Gallinaceous Birds Order Galliformes Family Phasianidae Gallinaceous birds refer to a group of ground-living birds, like pheasants, turkeys, grouse and quail, that are chicken-like and share certain physical characteristics. They have strong legs and very thick, powerful toes with well developed nails, which are perfect for scratching the ground in search of seeds & grains. They also eat fruits, berries, shoots, leaves, grasses and insects. They have strong seed-craking bills. Males in this group often have elaborate plumage they can raise or spread during breeding season to entice a harem of females. Most males, also known as cockbirds or roosters, do not help with raising the precocial chicks. Females are called hens. These birds usually only fly in short, explosive bursts for short distances (sometimes accom- panied by a racous call) before settling down again. Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopavo Famous for its role in that all-American of holidays, Thanksgiving, the turkey is our largest game- bird. Adult males, “gobblers” or “toms,” stand up to 3 feet tall and 3 to 4 feet long. The hens are almost a third shorter and weigh half as much. Like all ground birds that rely little on flight, turkeys are heavy birds – an adult tom may be up to 25 pounds. Compare that to a large great horned owl that may weigh only three pounds! Wild turkeys have long slender necks and bodies with a fleshy, multi-colored head and neck. Their overall plumage is metallic bronze, browns and blacks to help them camouflage in the wild, and their tail feathers are edged in brown instead of the white tips found on domesticated turkeys.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Avian Ecology
    Compendium of Avian Ecology ZOL 360 Brian M. Napoletano All images taken from the USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/id/framlst/infocenter.html Taxonomic information based on the A.O.U. Check List of North American Birds, 7th Edition, 1998. Ecological Information obtained from multiple sources, including The Sibley Guide to Birds, Stokes Field Guide to Birds. Nest and other images scanned from the ZOL 360 Coursepack. Neither the images nor the information herein be copied or reproduced for commercial purposes without the prior consent of the original copyright holders. Full Species Names Common Loon Wood Duck Gaviiformes Anseriformes Gaviidae Anatidae Gavia immer Anatinae Anatini Horned Grebe Aix sponsa Podicipediformes Mallard Podicipedidae Anseriformes Podiceps auritus Anatidae Double-crested Cormorant Anatinae Pelecaniformes Anatini Phalacrocoracidae Anas platyrhynchos Phalacrocorax auritus Blue-Winged Teal Anseriformes Tundra Swan Anatidae Anseriformes Anatinae Anserinae Anatini Cygnini Anas discors Cygnus columbianus Canvasback Anseriformes Snow Goose Anatidae Anseriformes Anatinae Anserinae Aythyini Anserini Aythya valisineria Chen caerulescens Common Goldeneye Canada Goose Anseriformes Anseriformes Anatidae Anserinae Anatinae Anserini Aythyini Branta canadensis Bucephala clangula Red-Breasted Merganser Caspian Tern Anseriformes Charadriiformes Anatidae Scolopaci Anatinae Laridae Aythyini Sterninae Mergus serrator Sterna caspia Hooded Merganser Anseriformes Black Tern Anatidae Charadriiformes Anatinae
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]