Texas Open Beaches Act

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Texas Open Beaches Act 20th Annual Robert C. Sneed TEXAS LAND TITLE INSTITUTE TEXAS OPEN BEACHES ACT December 2-3, 2010 Hyatt Regency Hill Country Resort & Spa San Antonio Mr. Daryl W. Bailey Looper Reed & McGraw, P.C. 1300 Post Oak Blvd. Suite 2000 Houston, Texas 77056 (713) 986-7125 396008.1 Daryl W. Bailey Trial Lawyer/Director Daryl represents plaintiffs and defendants in trials, appeals, mediation and arbitration. As a trial lawyer, Daryl has successfully obtained favorable judgments for his clients through jury verdicts and bench trials. As a counselor, Daryl has been instrumental in assisting clients in resolving their disputes through mediation-formal and informal. Daryl’s practice in commercial, business and general civil litigation includes real estate, construction and employment litigation. He is particularly accomplished in disputes related to real estate and claims against title insurance companies and their insureds. Through a wide variety of representations of clients, 1300 Post Oak Blvd. Suite 2000 Daryl has gained substantial experience in cases involving multiple parties, Houston, Texas 77056 contracts, fraud, business torts, DTPA, UCC, trade secrets, employer/ T: (713) 986-7000 employee contracts (including non-competes), sexual harassment and F: (713) 986-7100 [email protected] other discrimination claims, landlord/tenant, and lien filings, contractors and subcontractors rights and eminent domain / condemnation. Daryl’s appellate practice includes a case he argued before the Texas Supreme Court which the Texas Lawyer ranked as one of the top 50 cases that had a significant impact on Texas law. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES, MEMBERSHIPS & AFFILIATIONS • State Bar of Texas (Member: Appellate Section; Construction Section; Labor & Employment Law Section; Litigation Section; Real Estate, Trust & Probate Section). • U.S. Court of Appeals (5th Circuit). • U.S. District Court (Southern District of Texas). • Houston Bar Association (Member: Appellate Section; Construction Section; Labor & Employment Law Section; Litigation Section; Real Estate Section). • Texas Land Title Association (Judiciary Committee, Institute Committee). PUBLICATIONS AND SPEECHES • Author, “Storm of Litigation Brews Over Open Beach Exemption”, Houston Chronicle, June 26, 2009, http://www.chron.com/disp/storympl/ editorial/outlook/6499969.html • Author, “Title insurance - Think of it as a horse of a different color”, Volume 36, Number 19, September 16th - 22nd, 2005, Edition of the Houston Business Journal. • Co-Author and Speaker: “Texas Title Examination” Lorman, 2001, 2002. • Co-Author and Speaker: “Title Law in Texas,” N.B.I., 1998. Pursuing Unrivaled Results © 2010 Looper Reed & McGraw, P.C. Daryl W. Bailey REPORTED CASES Trial Lawyer/Director • Moss v. Tennant, 722 S.W.2d 762 (Tex. App. -- Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, 1300 Post Oak Blvd. Suite 2000 writ ref’d n.r.e.) Houston, Texas 77056 • Ojeda De Toca v. Wise, 748 S.W.2d 449 (Tex. 1988) T: (713) 986-7000 • Manhattan Construction v. Hood Lanco, Inc., et al., 762 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. F: (713) 986-7100 App. -- Houston [14th Dist.] 1988, writ denied) [email protected] • Martinka v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, 836 S.W.2d 773 (Tex. App. -- Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, writ denied) • First National Petroleum Corp. v. Lloyd, 908 S.W.2d 23 (Tex. App. -- Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, no writ) EDUCATION • 1979 - B.A., Michigan State University • 1986 - J.D., South Texas College of Law HONORS • Daryl’s peers have rated his legal abilities from Very High to Preeminent and his general ethics as Very High resulting in an AV rating by Martindale-Hubbell. • Selected as a Super Lawyer by Texas Monthly and Law & Politics magazine, 2006, 2009, 2010 • Listed in Who’s Who in American Law. • Listed in Who’s Who Among Top Executives. Pursuing Unrivaled Results © 2010 Looper Reed & McGraw, P.C. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................ i Texas Open Beaches Act ............................................................................................................ 1 I. Historical View ....................................................................................................................... 1 II. Law in Texas ............................................................................................................................ 2 A. Texas Open Beaches Act .................................................................................. 2 i. Enforcement of the TOBA……………………………………. 4 ii. The TOBA Amendment……………………………………… 4 iii. Constitutional Amendment Adopting the Open Beach Act….. 5 B. Boundary Issues …………………………………………………….. 5 i. The Rolling Easement Doctrine……………………………….…. 6 C. Severance v. Patterson…………………………………………………. 7 i. The Case …………………………………………………………. 7 ii. The Decision…………………………………………………….. 9 iii. The Dissenting Opinion ………………………………………. 10 iv. Consequences………………………………………………….. 12 III. Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dept. of EPA ........................ 13 IV. Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 15 i 396008.1 TEXAS OPEN BEACHES ACT I. Historical View The State of Texas has 367 miles of coastline along the Gulf of Mexico.1 Historically, this coastal area was used for roads, commerce and public recreation. The public's use of Gulf Coast beaches, even driving and parking on them, was based on the assumption they were owned and controlled by the State.2 However, as the Texas coastline continued to develop, it became crucial to more clearly regulate the public access to beaches. Initially, the impetus for regulating Texas beaches was less related to public use or recreation, but, instead, directly related to mineral right ownership.3 Many beachfront property owners wanted to keep the public away from their property in favor of leasing their land for mineral exploration. Under Texas common law, the boundary between private and public beachfront or lakefront property was determined by the natural line of vegetation.4 On public beaches, construction was not allowed and the public had unrestricted access.5 In the seminal case of Luttes vs. State,6 the Texas Supreme Court defined the boundary line separating beachfront private property from state owned beaches along the Gulf.7 Luttes alleged that due to accretion, his boundary line moved and, therefore, he obtained title to certain 1 Matthew Tresaugue & Harvey Rice, Beach Homeowners Win Ruling, Houston Chron., Nov. 5, 2010, available at http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7281075.html; See also Texas Beaches, http://www.texasbeaches.us/index5.html (last visited Nov. 12, 2010). 2 EDDIE R. FISHER & ANGELA L. SUNLEY, A LINE IN THE SAND: BALANCING THE TEXAS OPEN BEACHES ACT AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT (2007), http://www.csc.noaa.gov/cz/CZ07_Proceedings/PDFs/Tuesday_ Abstracts/ 2658. Fisher.pdf. 3 Id. 4 Id. 5 Id. 6 Luttes v. State, 324 S.W.2d 167 (Tex. 1958). 7 Severance v. Patterson, 2010 WL 4371438, at *6 (Tex. 2010). 2010 Texas Land Title Institute Page 1 Texas Open Beaches Act 396008.1 mudflats located between the Texas mainland and Padre Island.8 The State disagreed and argued that the mudflats were State property because tidal waters still covered the mudflats, and, therefore, the mudflats were actually part of the seashore.9 According to the State, the relevant boundary line was the highest point reached by tidal waters on any one occasion.10 In deciding the case the Texas Supreme Court created legal precedent, holding that any area located seaward of the “Mean High Tide” (MHT) belonged to the State as part of the public trust, and any land landward of the MHT belonged to the private owner.11 The Court defined MHT as the average of highest daily water computed over the regular tidal cycle of 18.6 years.12 As a result of the Luttes decision, beachfront landowners constructed fences and barriers restricting vehicular and public access to coastal beaches.13 As might have been expected, Texans were unsatisfied.14 In order to end this public discontent and protect public access to the beaches, the State of Texas enacted the Texas Open Beaches Act in 1959.15 II. Law in Texas A. Texas Open Beaches Act Enacted in 1959, the Texas Open Beaches Act (“TOBA”)16 codifies the public’s pre- existing right of free and unrestricted access to public beaches on the Gulf of Mexico.17 The 8 Luttes, 324 S.W.2d at 169. 9 Id. 10 Id. 11 Luttes, 324 S.W.2d at 187. 12 Id. 13 EDDIE R. FISHER & ANGELA L. SUNLEY, A LINE IN THE SAND: BALANCING THE TEXAS OPEN BEACHES ACT AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT (2007), http://www.csc.noaa.gov/cz/CZ07_Proceedings/PDFs/Tuesday_ Abstracts/ 2658. Fisher.pdf. 14 Id. 15 Id. 16 TEX. NAT. RES. CODE Ch. 61, Acts of the 56th Legislature, 2nd Called Session, 1959, Chapter 19, page 108. (Codified in 1977 as Subchapter B, Chapter 61, Texas Natural Resources Code). 17 Id. §61.011. 2010 Texas Land Title Institute Page 2 Texas Open Beaches Act 396008.1 TOBA establishes an easement in favor of the public to access public beaches by prescription or dedication, or where a right of public use pre-exists.18 The TOBA defines the State’s beach (or public beach) as any beach area, whether publicly or privately owned, inland from the line of the coast’s Mean Low Tide (“MLT”) to the line of natural vegetation bordering on the Gulf of Mexico to which the public has acquired the right of use or easement to or over the area by prescription, dedication, presumption, or has retained a right
Recommended publications
  • Cape Hatteras National Seashore
    05 542745 ch05.qxd 3/23/04 9:01 AM Page 105 CHAPTER 5 Cape Hatteras National Seashore Driving along Hatteras and Ocracoke islands national seashore and other nature preserves are on a narrow strip of sand with the ocean close wild and beautiful. Being here, it’s easy to on both sides, you may think that the Outer imagine what it was like when the first English Banks are a geographic miracle. Why should colonists landed more than 400 years ago, or this razor-thin rim of sand persist far out in the when the Wright brothers flew the first airplane sea? How wild it seems, a land of windy beach over a century ago. Both events are well inter- with no end, always in motion, always vulner- preted at their sites. The area is fascinating eco- able to the next, slightly larger wave. There’s so logically, too. Here, north and south meet, the much here to see and learn, and so much soli- mix of ocean currents, climate, fresh and salt tude to enjoy. You’re like a passenger on an water, and geography creating a fabulous diver- enormous ship, and unpredictable nature is the sity of bird and plant life at places like the Pea captain. Island National Wildlife Refuge (p. 124) and Oddly, many people don’t see Cape Hatteras Nags Head Woods Ecological Preserve (p. 124). this way. When they think of the Outer Banks, In this sense, the area is much like Point Reyes, they think of Nags Head or Kill Devil Hills, its counterpart on the West Coast, covered in towns where tourist development has pushed chapter 21, “Point Reyes National Seashore.” right up to the edge of the sea and, in many And for children, the national seashore is a places, gotten really ugly.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 ^^ OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service \ NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in "Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms" (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property_________________________{______________' historic name Lake Acworth Beach and Bathhouse other names/site number N/A NOV27T009 2. Location________________________________________________ street & number Lakeshore Drive city, town Acworth ( ) vicinity of county Cobb code 067 state Georgia code GA zip code 30101 ( ) not for publication 3. Classification____________________________________________ Ownership of Property: Category of Property: ( ) private ( ) building(s) (X) public-local (X) district ( ) public-state ( ) site (X) public-federal ( ) structure ( ) object Number of Resources within Property: Contributing Noncontributing buildings 1 1 sites 0 0 structures 1 4 objects 0 0 total 2 5 Contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: N/A Name of previous listing: N/A Name of related multiple property listing: N/A Lake Acworth Beach and Bathhouse, Cobb County, Georgia 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Sand 'N Sea Beach Homes Are Sleigh-Landing Approved
    Chron.com November 21, 2013 | Galveston Holiday Magic | Houston Chronicle Custom Publishing Group | 7 Sand ‘N Sea beach homes are sleigh-landing approved Imagine the panoramic beachfront view from the porches of Coastal Colors. Guests will be sitting pretty during the holidays on a Sand ‘N Sea beach house deck. With a selection of 150 properties, Sand ‘N Sea has the right place for groups of all sizes. Pet- friendly homes are available, too, so everyone can stay and play together. And if the youngsters ask, all homes have preapproved landing areas for Santa’s sleigh. Photos courtesy of Sand ‘N Sea Browse the vacation rental homes at sandnsea.com and see photos, floor plans, guest njoy a holiday home away from home at the beach this year. Celebrate with reviews and amenity lists for each house. Search by family and friends during the holidays or steal away for a relaxing retreat after preferred amenities, dates, or location and then book Ethe holidays — either way, a Sand ‘N Sea vacation home on Galveston Island is online or call the office. Join Sand ‘N Sea’s Guest Advan- the place to be. tage program and earn points toward a free weekend at a Make family memories this year preparing that special meal in a coastal kitchen, Sand ‘N Sea property. searching for sand dollars with family and friends, and toasting the view from a Rental agents are on standby, ready to help plan the ideal holiday vaca- beach or bay house porch. tion. Call 409-797-5500 or visit www.sandnsea.com..
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Coastal Erosio in Alaska in a Changing Climate
    Responses to Coastal Erosio in Alaska in a Changing Climate A Guide for Coastal Residents, Business and Resource Managers, Engineers, and Builders Orson P. Smith Mikal K. Hendee Responses to Coastal Erosio in Alaska in a Changing Climate A Guide for Coastal Residents, Business and Resource Managers, Engineers, and Builders Orson P. Smith Mikal K. Hendee Alaska Sea Grant College Program University of Alaska Fairbanks SG-ED-75 Elmer E. Rasmuson Library Cataloging in Publication Data: Smith, Orson P. Responses to coastal erosion in Alaska in a changing climate : a guide for coastal residents, business and resource managers, engineers, and builders / Orson P. Smith ; Mikal K. Hendee. – Fairbanks, Alaska : Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2011. p.: ill., maps ; cm. - (Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks ; SG-ED-75) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Coast changes—Alaska—Guidebooks. 2. Shore protection—Alaska—Guidebooks. 3. Beach erosion—Alaska—Guidebooks. 4. Coastal engineering—Alaska—Guidebooks. I. Title. II. Hendee, Mikal K. III. Series: Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks; SG-ED-75. TC330.S65 2011 ISBN 978-1-56612-165-1 doi:10.4027/rceacc.2011 © Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks. All rights reserved. Credits This book, SG-ED-75, is published by the Alaska Sea Grant College Program, supported by the U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA National Sea Grant Office, grant NA10OAR4170097, projects A/75-02 and A/161-02; and by the University of Alaska Fairbanks with state funds. Sea Grant is a unique partnership with public and private sectors combining research, education, and technology transfer for the public.
    [Show full text]
  • U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management General Land Office Records
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT GENERAL LAND OFFICE RECORDS Federal Land Patents Survey Plats and Field Notes Land Status Records Presented by Frances A. Hager, Librarian Arkansas Tech University Russellville, Arkansas GENERAL INFORMATION The Bureau of Land Management provides live access to Federal land conveyance records for the Public Land States, including image access to more than five million Federal land title records issued between 1820 and the present. There are also images related to survey plats and field notes, dating back to 1810. 1 GENERAL INFORMATION (CONT.) Due to the organization of documents in the General Land Office collection, this site DOES NOT currently contain every Federal title record issued for the Public Land States. LAND PATENTS Federal Land Patents offer researchers a source of information on the initial transfer of land titles from the Federal government to individuals. This allows the researcher to see Who—Patentee, Assignee, Warrantee, etc Location—Legal Land Description When—Issue Date Type of patent 2 LAND PATENTS, CONT. Types of Patents Cash entries Homestead Military Warrants Displays Basic information in table format PDF of actual document HTTP://WWW.GLORECORDS.BLM.GOV/ Header for the Bureau of Land Management website 3 SEARCHING LAND PATENTS Location State County Name Last Name First Name Middle Name SEARCHING LAND PATENTS, CONT. Land Description Township Range Meridian Section Miscellaneous Land Office Document # Indian Allot. # Survey# Issue Date 4 My Hager Family Tree I will use the “Marquess” line in my Land Patent Search. The Land Patents initial search page. 5 Search Results Screen 6 Patent Detail Patent Image that can be printed or e-mailed.
    [Show full text]
  • John Marshall and Indian Land Rights: a Historical Rejoinder to the Claim of “Universal Recognition” of the Doctrine of Discovery
    WATSON 1-9-06 FINAL.DOC 1/9/2006 8:36:03 AM John Marshall and Indian Land Rights: A Historical Rejoinder to the Claim of “Universal Recognition” of the Doctrine of Discovery Blake A. Watson∗ I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................481 II. JOHNSON V. MCINTOSH ...................................................................483 III. ROGER WILLIAMS AND “THE SINNE OF THE PATTENTS” .................487 IV. EUROPEAN VIEWS OF INDIAN LAND RIGHTS DURING “THE AGE OF DISCOVERY” ......................................................................498 A. Spanish Views of Indian Land Rights ................................499 B. French Views of Indian Land Rights .................................511 C. Dutch and Swedish Views of Indian Land Rights .............517 D. Early English and Colonial Views of Indian Land Rights ..................................................................................520 V. “THE SINNE OF THE PATTENTS” REDUX: INDIAN TITLE IN NEW JERSEY ............................................................................................540 I. INTRODUCTION John Marshall was a historian as well as a jurist. In 1804, in the introductory volume of his five-volume series entitled The Life of George Washington, Marshall sought to place Washington’s life in con- text by presenting a lengthy narrative “of the principal events preceding our revolutionary war.”1 Almost twenty years later, when crafting the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v. McIntosh,2 Marshall relied heavily on his history of America “from its discovery to the present day” in order to proclaim “the universal rec- ognition” of two legal principles: (1) that European discovery of lands in America “gave exclusive title to those who made it”; and (2) that ∗ Professor of Law, University of Dayton School of Law. J.D. 1981, Duke Univer- sity School of Law; B.A. 1978, Vanderbilt University. Research for this Article was supported by the University of Dayton School of Law through a summer research grant.
    [Show full text]
  • MANATEE COVE BEACH HOUSE | Bring Your Boat! - Old Naples CASE No
    EXHIBIT B 4/2/2019 LUXURY CONCIERGE | MANATEE COVE BEACH HOUSE | Bring Your Boat! - Old Naples CASE No. CEZONE201900297 Trip Boards(https://www.vrbo.com/tripboard) Login Help Feedback USD ($) List your property (https://www.vrbo.com/lyp?icid=IL_LYP_O_Text_lyptopnav) (https://www.vrbo.com/) Where Moorings, Naples, FL, USA Check In heck Out Search $700 avg/night 8 Reviews Exceptional 5/5 Enter dates for accurate pricing Check In Check Out Guests 1 guest Book Now LUXURY RENTALS Ask Manager a Question 1 / 16 For booking assistance, call Vrbo at 888-640-7927 Overview Amenities Reviews Map Rates & Availability Property # 452379 UXURY CONCIERGE | MANATEE COVE BEACH HOUSE | Bring Your Boat! House · 3800 sq. ft. Sleeps: 10 Bedrooms: 4 Bathrooms: 3 (https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=26.129696,-81.800371&z=15&t=m&hl=en- le.com/maps/@26.129696,-81.800371,15z/data=!10m1!1e1!12b1?source=apiv3&rapsrc=apiv3)US&gl=US&mapclient=apiv3) Map data ©2019 Google Min Stay: 4 - 14 nights Old Naples, Naples, FL, USA · 6 min walk to the beach Instant Confirmation Hot Tub Pool Air Conditioning 1 block to 3rd St Shopping and Dining Farmers market and the Beach. https://www.vrbo.com/452379?adultsCount=1&noDates=true&petIncluded=false 1/9 4/2/2019 Please Note: Please contact us for stays less than 30 nights.LUXUR ThisY CONCIERGE home is profes |sionally MANA TEEManaged COVE by LuxurBEACHy R entals.HOUSE | Bring Your Boat! - Old Naples Bring your boat or rent locally--there is a boat dock available to use at the property! Located in the heart of old Naples third Street shopping and dining area and just a stone's throw to the beautiful white sand beaches and turquoise waters of the gulf.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Texian National You Will Be Identified with a Sovereign Entity (Herein After), the Republic of Texas
    1. IDENTIFICATION – As a Texian National you will be identified with a sovereign entity (herein after), the Republic of Texas. A Texian National will not be a Citizen of the State of Texas, a United States Citizen or an American Citizen. Just as one born or naturalized in Norway would be a Norwegian National, one born or naturalized in the Republic of Texas will be a National of the sovereign Texas Republic. Texian Nationals will not be subjects of any other government. 2. TAXATION – As a Texian National you will not be subject to comply with any tax of the State of Texas or parts of the States of Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico, Colorado, and Wyoming, or the United States. Texian Nationals will not be required to pay enforcers Federal Income Tax, Social Security, or FICA. IRS, Federal taxes including those limited to basics such as national defense, highway, police or courts. The people’s Government will operate only from importexport fees and Chartered Corporate fees. 3. LAND OWNERSHIP – As a Texian National you will have the ability to reclaim the land that you live on through a land patent and the possibility of owning your land outright (allodial title) exists. 4. ENERGY – As a Texian National you will be free to use and develop any energy system technologically available. Texian Nationals will be free to pursue and use renewable and free energy options. 5. MEDICINE – As a Texian National you will be free to pursue any remedy available to cure or relieve symptoms related to your body. Vaccines will not be forced upon Texian Nationals.
    [Show full text]
  • A Background Study of Historic Land Use of The
    PROPERTY OF LIBRARY IDIVISION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES NARO ccs i4oooO GWaJ13I BACKGROUND STUDY OF HISTORIC LAND USE OF THE GATEWAY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA STATEN ISLAND UNIT Sherene Baugher-Perlin Ph.D Frederick Bluefeld B.A P.B.E.C With special assistance by George Rappaport Ph.D Prepared by the Staten Island Institute of the Arts and Sciences under contract number IFB-NARO-9-0047 for the North Atlantic Regional Office National Park Service U.S Department of the Interior July 1980 Table of Contents Listof Figures ii Acknowledgements Iv Introduction .. Fortwadsworth ....... The Beaches 30 MillerField 49 The Britton Cottage 70 Great Kills Park 86 Recommendations 97 References Cited .1 99 Annotated Bibliography 106 List of Figures No Title Page Map of the Gateway Property on Staten Island map of Old Town Diagram of the excavation area at Oude Dorp 11 Drawing of Fort Richmond under construction 1861 21 Beers map of Fort Wadsworth 1874 22 view bf the Narrows 1854 24 mansion in Arrochar 25 Robinsons map of Fort Wadsworth 1898 27 Military map of Fort Wadsworth 1962 29 10 Historic map of Staten Islands terrain 31 11 Robinsons map of South Beach Resorts 1898 33 12 Pier at Midland Beach 35 13 Hotels at Midland Beach 35 14 Bromleys map of South Beach Resorts 1917 37 15 Robinsons map of Midland Beach Resorts 1898 39 16 Bromleys map of Midland Beach Resorts 1917 43 17 Bromleys map of New Dorp Resorts 1917 44 18 Woodland Beach tent camp 46 19 View of Midland Beach 46 20 Print of the Vanderbilt Home 61 21 Beers map of Vanderbilt Estate 1874 63 List
    [Show full text]
  • General Land Office Book
    FORWARD n 1812, the General Land Office or GLO was established as a federal agency within the Department of the Treasury. The GLO’s primary responsibility was to oversee the survey and sale of lands deemed by the newly formed United States as “public domain” lands. The GLO was eventually transferred to the Department of Interior in 1849 where it would remain for the next ninety-seven years. The GLO is an integral piece in the mosaic of Oregon’s history. In 1843, as the GLO entered its third decade of existence, new sett lers and immigrants had begun arriving in increasing numbers in the Oregon territory. By 1850, Oregon’s European- American population numbered over 13,000 individuals. While the majority resided in the Willamette Valley, miners from California had begun swarming northward to stake and mine gold and silver claims on streams and mountain sides in southwest Oregon. Statehood would not come for another nine years. Clearing, tilling and farming lands in the valleys and foothills and having established a territorial government, the settlers’ presumed that the United States’ federal government would act in their behalf and recognize their preemptive claims. Of paramount importance, the sett lers’ claims rested on the federal government’s abilities to negotiate future treaties with Indian tribes and to obtain cessions of land—the very lands their new homes, barns and fields were now located on. In 1850, Congress passed an “Act to Create the office of the Surveyor-General of the public lands in Oregon, and to provide for the survey and to make donations to settlers of the said public lands.” On May 5, 1851, John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Federal Government Own
    TOJCI.DORAN.DOC 5/25/2012 2:59 PM DOES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OWN THE PORE SPACE UNDER PRIVATE LANDS IN THE WEST? IMPLICATIONS OF THE STOCK-RAISING HOMESTEAD ACT OF 1916 FOR GEOLOGIC STORAGE OF CARBON DIOXIDE BY KEVIN L. DORAN* AND ANGELA M. CIFOR** This Article establishes that pursuant to the mineral reservation contained in the Stock-Raising Homestead Act of 1916 (SRHA), as well as U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence that has further defined the scope of that reservation, the federal government likely holds title to some 70 million acres of subsurface pore space located under private land in the West. In addressing the issue of pore space ownership, scholars and regulators have focused on the question of who owns the pore space when the mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate. This approach, however, overlooks the critical fact that for the approximately 70 million acres of land patented under the SRHA, the United States government held the original fee simple absolute, and conveyed the land while retaining “all the coal and other minerals in the lands.” In 1983 in Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc., the Supreme Court delineated a four-part test for determining if something falls within the scope of the SRHA’s mineral reservation—a test that was further explicated by the Court’s decision in 2004 in BedRoc Limited, Inc. v. United States. This Article analyzes this jurisprudence vis-à-vis the question of whether or not pore space falls within the scope of the SRHA’s mineral reservation. Based on a detailed analysis of the history of the SRHA and relevant jurisprudence by the Supreme Court and other federal and state courts, we conclude that the federal government likely owns the pore space for those lands patented under the SRHA.
    [Show full text]
  • Single-Family Residence 2323 5Th Street Santa Monica, California City Landmark Assessment Report
    Single-Family Residence 2323 5th Street Santa Monica, California City Landmark Assessment Report Evaluation Report Building Permit History City Directory Research Tax Assessor Map Sanborn Maps Prepared for: City of Santa Monica Planning Division Prepared by: PCR Services Corporation Santa Monica, California April 2006 Single-Family Residence 2323 5th Street City of Santa Monica APN: 4289-007-012 City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation BACKGROUND INFORMATION Description of site or structure, note any major alterations and dates of alterations The subject property is situated on the west side of 5th Street between Strand Street on the north and Hollister Avenue on the south. The property faces west and occupies Lot 2 of Block 4 of the Highland Tract in the City of Santa Monica. The lot size is approximately 50 feet by 140 feet and contains a large, one-and-one-half/two story single- family residence and a small one-story combination apartment and garage. The main residence is situated towards the front (west) of the parcel while the rear (east) double-car enclosed garage/apartment is accessed from a narrow driveway near the property’s south boundary. The subject property is located in a mixed single- and multi-family residential neighborhood. This property has not been previously identified in the City’s Historic Resources Inventory nor in the Ocean Park Historic Resources Survey Update completed in 2004. Tax assessor records indicate that the subject property was constructed in 1930, although the current owner, who has lived there since 1937, states that the residence was constructed in or before 1925.
    [Show full text]