<<

Marine Pollution Bulletin 150 (2020) 110685

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Marine Pollution Bulletin

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpolbul

Baseline Microplastics in marine sediments and rabbitfish (Siganus fuscescens) from selected coastal areas of Oriental, T

∗ Lilibeth A. Bucola, , Edwin F. Romanob, Sherlyn M. Cabcabana, Lyca Mae D. Siplona, Gianni Coleen Madrida, Abner A. Bucolc, Beth Polidorod a Biology Department, State University, City, Negros Oriental, Philippines b Chemistry Department, Negros Oriental State University, Dumaguete City, Negros Oriental, Philippines c -Angelo King Center for Research and Environmental Management, Dumaguete City, Negros Oriental, Philippines d School of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, 4701, W. Thunderbird, Rd, Glendale, AZ, USA

ABSTRACT

The Philippines is currently ranked as the third top producer of plastic wastes, yet little research has been conducted on marine plastic pollution in this fishery- dependent, developing country. This study is the first in the nation to quantify and characterize microplastics ingested by a commercially important fish, the rabbitfish (Siganus fuscescens), in the coastal areas of Negros Oriental, central Philippines. Across all sites, the diversity of microplastic polymer types was highest in the guts of S. fuscescens from Dumaguete, a densely populated city. Microplastic particles extracted from subtidal sediment samples from Silliman Beach in Dumaguete were dominated by semi-synthetic microfibers (rayon), probably from clothing and textiles. However, these microplastic types were absent in the guts of fish, likely due to the different location and character of their feeding habitats. This study confirms for the first time the presence and diversity of microplastics in an edible finfish in the Philippines.

Plastics are synthetically produced from polymerization of mole- The presence of microplastics in the marine environment increases cular monomers, derived from extraction of oil or gas, to form macro- their bioavailability potential to marine organisms (Van Cauwenberghe molecules with infinite ways of utilization for human society (North et al., 2015), while at the same time enhancing the risk of bioaccu- and Halden, 2013; Mahat, 2017). The majority of the advances of mulation of chemical substances found in or adsorbed to microplastics, mankind over the past century have been facilitated by the use of since the particles can be ingested by living organisms (Koelmans, plastics (North and Halden, 2013). However, the accumulation of 2015). Humans can be exposed to the negative effects of microplastics plastics in the form of litter in the marine environment has become a when consuming seafood products (Smith et al., 2018). Negative phy- pervasive pollution problem affecting all of the worlds’ oceans (Frias sical effects of accumulated microplastics in human bodies include et al., 2010). Furthermore, it has been well-documented that degrada- enhanced inflammatory response, size-related toxicity of plastic parti- tion and fragmentation of plastic debris present in the ocean leads to cles, chemical transfer of adsorbed chemical pollutants, and disruption the formation of minute particulates of plastic or “microplastics of the gut microbiome while microplastics and their chemical con- (Browne et al., 2011). stituents may cause localized particle toxicity (Wright and Kelly, 2017; Microplastics are of two forms, primary and secondary. Primary Smith et al., 2018). microplastics are produced intentionally at a microscopic size while The Philippines generates 0.28–0.75 million metric tons of marine secondary microplastics are formed from mechanical and chemical plastic per year which makes it as the 3rd largest contributor of plastic degradation of microplastics, resulting in fragments and fibers leaking into the ocean (Jambeck et al., 2015). Most Filipinos depend on (Mathalon and Hill, 2014; Masura et al., 2015; Nadal et al., 2016). The fish as a main source of food (e.g. for fatty acids, proteins and other most common plastic polymers found in the environment include micro-nutrients) and for their livelihood. One of the most important polystyrene (used in packaging and industrial insulation), acrylic, fishes for local consumption are rabbitfishes (Family Siganidae) be- polyethylene (PE) (used in facial scrubs), polypropylene (PP) (used in cause of their meaty, tasty flesh and high concentration of protein fishing gear), polyamide (PA) (nylon), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), poly- (Wahyuningtyas et al., 2017). However, there is paucity of information styrene (PS), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) on the presence of microplastics in fishery resources in the Philippines and polyester fragments (Mathalon and Hill, 2014; Avio et al., 2017). (Abreo, 2018). Studies have been done in the Philippines on the

∗ Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (L.A. Bucol), [email protected] (E.F. Romano), [email protected] (S.M. Cabcaban), [email protected] (L.M.D. Siplon), [email protected] (G.C. Madrid), [email protected] (A.A. Bucol), [email protected] (B. Polidoro). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110685 Received 28 May 2019; Received in revised form 21 October 2019; Accepted 23 October 2019 Available online 06 November 2019 0025-326X/ © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. L.A. Bucol, et al. Marine Pollution Bulletin 150 (2020) 110685

Fig. 1. Location of sampling sites in Negros Oriental, Philippines (https://maps-for-free.com/). microplastics found in beach sediments (e.g. Kalnasa et al., 2019; Paler dry sample weight. To remove organic matter, the procedures by et al., 2019) and mussels (Argamino & Janairo, 2016) but none on in- Karami et al. (2017) were followed with modifications. To remove or- gestion by fishes. In other parts of the world, fishes have been shown to ganic material, 150 g of sediment was soaked with 150 ml of 10% KOH ingest microplastics (e.g. Neves et al., 2015; Hastuti et al., 2019; Tanaka solution and heated in an oven for 40 h at 40 °C. After which, the 10% and Takada, 2016). KOH solution was drained and the sediment samples were washed with This study aimed to provide the first characterization and quanti- distilled water and oven-dried at 90 °C for 40 h for extraction of mi- fication of microplastics in marine subtidal sediments and a commer- croplastic particles. cially exploited fishery resource from selected coastal waters of Negros To extract microplastic particles, a 150 g of dried sediment sample Oriental, central Philippines. In four selected localities in Negros was subjected to zinc chloride extraction. Each dried sediment sample Oriental, rabbitfish (Siganus fuscescens) were sampled from October was divided into three sub-samples (50 g each) to facilitate faster se-

2018 to January 2019 in areas where there are existing fisheries paration process. Each sub-sample was mixed with 100 ml of ZnCl2 − (Dumaguete, Bais, , and ; Fig. 1). Subtidal marine solution (p = 1.52 g cm 3) in a 250-ml beaker. The resulting solution sediments were sampled off Silliman Beach in Dumaguete from October was stirred at 1000 rpm for 2 min and settled for 6 min. After settling to December 2018. time, the solution was filtered with the aid of a syringe, metal spoon Based on 2015 population data, two of the sites are densely popu- and Whatman filter no. 2 (pore size 8 μm). This process was repeated lated cities (Dumaguete = 131,377 residents; Bais = 76,291) while the twice to ensure complete extraction of microplastics. The filter paper other two sites (Manjuyod = 42,332 and Ayungon = 46,303) are small was washed with distilled water. The washed filter paper was dried in town rural municipalities. In Dumaguete, a 1.8 ha municipal dumpsite an oven and placed in a clean petri dish for optical microscopy analysis. located about 6.86 km upstream of the Banica River is likely a major With the use of clean forceps, the suspected microplastics particles, source of microplastics, aside from a number of small creeks and under the view of a stereomicroscope (magnification 40x), were drainage canals that directly discharge untreated domestic sewage transferred in a clean Whatman filter paper no. 2 to measure the par- wastes. Bais is also traversed by a major river system that drain do- ticles shape and size. mestic wastes. Manjuyod and Ayungon are located north of Bais Bay. To account for possible laboratory contamination, blanks (Petri Although the latter two sites are considered rural areas, plastic wastes dishes with distilled water to serve as controls) were prepared for every were also observed along the beaches of these coastal communities. observation. Particles that were highly similar to those found in these Samples of S. fuscescens (n = 30 per site) were obtained directly controls were excluded from analyses. Throughout the course of the from fishermen (caught by gillnets, spears, and corrals) operating study, only two microplastic types (fine fibers of cellulose acetate and within each of the four sites (Dumaguete, Bais, Manjuyod, and rayon) were detected from the blanks. Ayungon). Among fishes, rabbitfishes are known to have high site fi- After preliminary microscopy, all extracted microplastic (e.g. from delity with very restricted home ranges (Fox, 2012; Bellwood et al., fish GI tracts and marine sediments), were identified to polymer type 2016), which make them good indicators for the presence and/or using an FTIR “Spectrum 2” instrument via attenuated total reflectance concentration of microplastic and other contaminants in their localities “ATR” mode with 8 scans using 4 cm-1 resolution. Spectra were gen- (Fang et al., 2009). Upon collection, fish samples were immediately erated from 4000 cm-1 - 450 cm-1. Background scan was done before the transported to the laboratory in an ice chest. Upon arrival, each fish was analysis and every 2 h. Each of the FTIR spectra was evaluated manu- measured, weighed, and dissected to remove the gastro-intestinal (GI) ally based on the position of peaks and if the correlation was low tract. Each GI tract was then subjected to organic digestion using 10% (< 0.6), the sample was excluded in the analysis. KOH for two weeks, followed by filtration using Whatman filter no. 2 Across all 120 S. fuscescens samples collected from four localities, 56 (pore size 8 μm). Microscopic examination was performed using a (46.7%) individuals had microplastics in their guts, with five micro- stereo microscope with attached digital camera. plastic polymer types were confirmed (Fig. 2). This percentage is lower Sediment samples off Silliman Beach in Dumaguete (n = 15) were compared to that of S. canaliculatus (100%, n = 30 samples) in In- obtained during the lowest tide (∼1 –2.5 m depth) of the day using a donesia by Hastuti et al. (2019) and in Engraulis japonicus in Japan with metal cylinder (5 cm × 25 cm). Following Masura et al. (2015), sedi- 77% (Tanaka & Takada, 2016) but higher compared to only 19.8% in ment samples were washed with distilled water and then weighed, the Portuguese Coast as reported by Neves et al. (2015). Excluding a dried at 90 °C for 40 h and re-weighed (nearest 0.1 mg) to determine the single fish from Manjuyod, which was found to have ingested 44

2 L.A. Bucol, et al. Marine Pollution Bulletin 150 (2020) 110685

microplastic types found in fish were polyethylene, polyamide, and polyethylene terephthalate. Although some of these were found in marine sediments, microplastics in sediments were dominated by rayon, polyethylene terephthalate and polyvinyl chloride. This differ- entiation in polymer type may be due to differences in the density of particles (Table S1), which may cause some polymer types to be more heavily deposited inshore, where subtidal sediments were collected. Differences may also be attributed to the highly specialized feeding modes and habitats of rabbifishes, which may select for specific polymer type deposition and availability. For example, S. fuscescens feeds on seagrass epiphytes, filamentous and seagrasses (Lepiten, 1992), that can be located further offshore and which may trap dif- ferent, floating microplastic types. In addition, fish are known to have high gut passage rates (Lepiten, 1992), which may vary based on the type or size of microplastics present in the GI tract. The potential var- ff Fig. 2. Distribution of the five types of microplastic particles from the GI tract iation in how di erent microplastic types can be distributed across of 56 S. fuscescens sampled from four locations. General purpose polystyrene different habitats and organisms is in need of additional study, espe- (GPPS), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyamide (PA), cially given our small sample size of marine sediments. and polypropylene (PP). In terms of the size of microplastics detected, confirmed micro- plastics were dominated by particles < 2000 μm, with the majority μ particles of polypropylene, the highest number and diversity of mi- within the range of about 1000 m. In general, smaller particles μ fi croplastics were observed in fish from Dumaguete. Dumaguete has the (< 2000 m) were primarily comprised of rayon bers followed by highest resident population of any city or town in Negros Oriental. polyethylene and polyethylene terephthalate, while larger microplastic – μ Although there are solid waste collection services in some areas, sizes (2000 5000 m) were mainly comprised of polypropelyne ff household and municipal waste enters urban streams and accumulates (Fig. 4). These di erences in the types of microplastics that comprise ff on coastlines due to lack of widespread services and the location of the di erent size classes may provide some insight to their source (e.g. fi landfill adjacent to a main stream. Browne et al. (2011) showed a direct rayon likely from micro bers from household and industrial waste- relationship between microplastic particles with human population water discharges), although these assumptions are compounded by ff density. unknown weathering, transport and age e ects. fi The average number of microplastic particles per fish was quite low Signi cantly (t-test p value < 0.01) larger average microplastic μ (0.6 particles/fish). In Indonesia, Hastuti et al. (2019) reported a range size and range of sizes (mean = 1,804 m ± 134 SE) were found to be of 4–52 particles/fish. Our average MP particles per fish estimate was ingested by S. fuscescens compared to microplastics extracted from μ also lower compared to sediment samples (12.3 particles/sediment marine sediments (mean = 1367.69 m ± 64.27 SE). These size dif- ff sample, equivalent to 0.082 items/g). Compared to other studies, our ferences may again be due to di erent polymer densities (see Table S1) fl ff estimate on MP particles in marine sediment was higher compared to and/or tidal currents that can in uence where and how di erent mi- the figures provided by Browne et al. (2011) with 0.025 items/g but croplastic types can be found in the marine environment (Lusher et al., lower than the estimate by Paler et al. (2019) with 0.26 items/g. 2017). For example, Digka et al. (2018) noted that smaller microplastic Kalnasa et al. (2019, however, did not provide specific estimates for MP particles are more likely to be retained in the sediment while larger particles, hence comparison cannot be directly made. Additionally, the particles are easily backwashed through the sand pores. Additionally, types of microplastics found in marine sediments vs. fish were sig- macroalgae and seagrass blades, which dominate the feeding habitats of nificantly different (Fig. 3). For example, polypropylene was found only in fish while rayon (semi-synthetic cellulose-based microfibers) was found only in marine sediments. In addition to polypropylene, the main

Fig. 3. Confirmed types of microplastic particles identified in the guts of S. fuscescens and subtidal sediments from Negros Oriental. Number in parentheses is average number of microplastics detected per sample. General purpose Fig. 4. Number of microplastic (MP) particles detected per microplastic type polystyrene (GPPS), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and size across all samples (n = 135). General purpose polystyrene (GPPS), polyamide (PA), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), rayon (RY), polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyamide (PA), poly- phenoxyresin (PR), and acrylic fiber (AF). (*each sample = 150 g dry weight of propylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), rayon (RY), phenoxyresin (PR), and sediment). acrylic fiber (AF).

3 L.A. Bucol, et al. Marine Pollution Bulletin 150 (2020) 110685 rabbitfishes, have been shown to adsorb microplastic particles Fang, J.K.H., Wu, R.S.S., Zheng, G.J., Au, D.W.T., Lam, P.K.S., Shin, P.K.S., 2009. The use (Sundbæk et al., 2018; Goss et al., 2018). of muscle burden in rabbitfish Siganus oramin for monitoring polycyclic aromatic fi hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls in Victoria Harbour, Hong Kong and This pilot study con rms the presence and type of microplastics in possible human health risk. Sci. Total Environ. 407, 4327–4332. marine sediments and local seafood (rabbitfishes) in Negros Oriental, Frias, J.P.G.L., Sobral, P., Ferreira, A.M., 2010. Organic pollutants in microplastics from with the highest diversity of polymer types detected in a densely po- two beaches of the Portuguese coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60 (11), 1988–1992. Fox, R.J., 2012. The Trophic and Spatial Ecology of Rabbitfishes (, Siganidae) pulated locality (i.e. Dumaguete). It is important to note that aside from on Reefs. James Cook University PhD thesis. consuming the flesh of rabbitfish, a number of residents also consume Goss, H., Jaskiel, J., Rotjan, R., 2018. Thalassia testudinum as a potential vector for in- the salted guts (locally known as dayok) as a delicacy. Although the corporating microplastics into benthic marine food webs. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 135, – primary sources of these microplastics are not clear, e.g. whether de- 1085 1089. Hastuti, A.R., Lumbanbatu, D.T., Wardiatno, Y., 2019. The presence of microplastics in rived directly from land-based sources or from highly degraded, the digestive tract of commercial fishes off Pantai Indah Kapuk coast, Jakarta, transported marine debris, this study highlights the need for additional Indonesia. Biodiversitas: J. Biol. Divers. 20 (5), 1233–1242. research on the potential partitioning of different types and sizes of Jambeck, J.R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T.R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, ff R., Law, K.L., 2015. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347 microplastics in di erent components of the marine environment. A (6223), 768–771. better understanding of both the sources and the types of microplastics Karami, A., Golieskardi, A., Choo, C.K., Larat, V., Galloway, T.S., Salamatinia, B., 2017. ff entering marine environments and seafood can help inform improved The presence of microplastics in commercial salts from di erent countries. Sci. Rep. 7, 46173. management of local and regional solid waste. Lastly, in order to better Koelmans, A.A., 2015. Modeling the role of microplastics in bioaccumulation of organic understand the impacts of microplastics on marine organisms and chemicals to marine aquatic organisms. A critical review. In: Marine Anthropogenic eventually human health, future studies should also include quantifi- Litter. Springer, Cham, pp. 309–324. Kalnasa, M.L., Lantaca, S.M.O., Boter, L.C., Flores, G.J.T., Van Ryan Kristopher, R.G., cation of phthalates and other contaminants associated with micro- 2019. Occurrence of surface sand microplastic and litter in Macajalar Bay, plastics in a diversity of marine environments and seafoods. Philippines. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 149, 110521. Lepiten, M.V., 1992. The gut passage rate and daily food consumption of the rabbitfish, (Park). In: Chou, L.M., Wilkinson, C.R. (Eds.), Third ASEAN Acknowledgements Science and Technology Week Conference Proceedings. vol. 6. Dept. of Zool., Nat. Univ. Singapore and Nat. Sci. Tech. Bd, Singapore, pp. 327–336 Marine Science: We are grateful to the Chemistry Department of Negros Oriental Living Coastal Resources, 21-23 Sept. 1992. State University (NORSU) for use of laboratory equipment, especially Lusher, A.L., Welden, N.A., Sobral, P., Cole, M., 2017. Sampling, isolating and identifying microplastics ingested by fish and invertebrates. Anal. Methods. 9 (9), 1346–1360. the FTIR instrument. Dr. Rene Abesamis of SUAKCREM is also thanked Mahat, S., 2017. Separation and Quantification of Microplastics from Beach and Sediment for lending his personal microscopes. National Scientist Angel C. Alcala Samples Using the Bauta Microplastic-Sediment Separator (Master's Thesis. of Silliman University for supporting our study. We also benefited Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås. Masura, J., Baker, J.E., Foster, G.D., Arthur, C., Herring, C., 2015. Laboratory methods for during discussions with Dr. Jorge Emmanuel of Silliman University and the analysis of microplastics in the marine environment: recommendations for the rest of our collaborators. We are also indebted to the local fishermen quantifying synthetic particles in waters and sediments. In: NOAA Marine Debris of Negros Oriental for their cooperation and assistance. Program National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce Technical Memorandum NOS-ORandR-48 July 2015. Mathalon, A., Hill, P., 2014. Microplastic fibers in the subtidal ecosystem surrounding Appendix A. Supplementary data halifax harbor, nova scotia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 81 (1), 69–79. Nadal, M.A., Alomar, C., Deudero, S., 2016. High levels of microplastic ingestion by the semipelagic fish bogue Boops boops (L.) around the Balearic Islands. Environ. Pollut. Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https:// 214, 517–523. doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110685. Neves, D., Sobral, P., Ferreira, J.L., Pereira, T., 2015. Ingestion of microplastics by commercial fish off the Portuguese coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 101 (1), 119–126. North, E.J., Halden, R.U., 2013. Plastics and environmental health: the road ahead. Rev. References Environ. Health 28, 1–8. Paler, M.K.O., Malenab, M.C.T., Maralit, J.R., Nacorda, H.M., 2019. Plastic waste oc- Abreo, N.A.S., 2018. Marine plastics in the Philippines: a call for research. Philipp. Sci. currence on a beach off southwestern , Philippines. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 141, Lett. 11 (1), 20–21. 416–419. Argamino, C.R., Janairo, J.I.B., 2016. Qualitative assessment and management of mi- Sundbæk, K.B., Koch, I.D.W., Villaro, C.G., Rasmussen, N.S., Holdt, S.L., Hartmann, N.B., croplastics in Asian Green Mussels (Perna viridis) cultured in Bacoor Bay, , 2018. Sorption of fluorescent polystyrene microplastic particles to edible seaweed Phillipines. Environment Asia 9 (2), 48–54. Fucus vesiculosus. J. Appl. Phycol. 30 (5), 2923–2927. Avio, C.G., Cardelli, L.R., Gorbi, S., Pellegrini, D., Regoli, F., 2017. Microplastics pollution Smith, M., Love, D.C., Rochman, C.M., Neff, R.A., 2018. Microplastics in seafood and the after the removal of the Costa Concordia wreck: first evidences from a biomonitoring implications for human health. Curr. Envir. Health. Rpt. 5, 375–386. case study. Environ. Pollut. 227, 207–214. Tanaka, K., Takada, H., 2016. Microplastic fragments and microbeads in digestive tracts Bellwood, D.R., Goatley, C.H., Khan, J.A., Tebbett, S.B., 2016. Site fidelity and homing in of planktivorous fish from urban coastal waters. Sci. Rep. 6, 34351. juvenile rabbitfishes (Siganidae). Coral Reefs 35 (4), 1151–1155. Van Cauwenberghe, L., Devriese, L., Galgani, F., Robbens, J., Janssen, C.R., 2015. Browne, M.A., Crump, P., Niven, S.J., Teuten, E., Tonkin, A., Galloway, T., Thompson, R., Microplastics in sediments: a review of techniques, occurrence and effects. Mar. 2011. Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines woldwide: sources and sinks. Environ. Res. 111, 5–17. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (21), 9175–9179. Wahyuningtyas, L.A., Nurilmala, M., Sondita, M.F.A., Taurusman, A.A., Sudrajat, A.O., Digka, N., Tsangaris, C., Kaberi, H., Adamopoulou, A., Zeri, C., 2018. Microplastic 2017. Nutritional profile of rabbitfish (Siganus spp.) from the Kepulauan Seribu abundance and polymer types in a Mediterranean environment. Proceedings of the (Thousand Islands), Jakarta, Indonesia. Int. Food Res. J 24 (2), 685–690. International Conference on Microplastic Pollution in the Mediterranean Sea. Wright, S.L., Kelly, F.J., 2017. Plastic and human health: a micro issue? Environ. Sci. Springer, Cham, pp. 17–24. Technol. 51 (12), 6634–6647.

4