Delphinus Delphis Gulf of Corinth Subpopulation, Common Dolphin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2020: T156206333A170381113 Scope(s): Global Language: English Delphinus delphis Gulf of Corinth subpopulation, Common Dolphin Assessment by: Bearzi, G., Bonizzoni, S. & Santostasi, N. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Bearzi, G., Bonizzoni, S. & Santostasi, N. 2020. Delphinus delphis(Gulf of Corinth subpopulation). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T156206333A170381113. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T156206333A170381113.en Copyright: © 2020 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: Arizona State University; BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Mammalia Cetartiodactyla Delphinidae Scientific Name: Delphinus delphis Gulf of Corinth subpopulation Linnaeus, 1758 Parent Species: See Delphinus delphis Common Name(s): • English: Common Dolphin • French: Dauphin commun • Spanish; Castilian: Delfin Comun • Albanian: Delfin i zakonshem عئاشلا نيفلدلا ,Arabic: Al-dolpheen Al-sha'eh • • Greek, Modern Kino delfini, Κοινό δελφίνι (1453-): יוצמ ןיפלוד ,Hebrew: Dolphin matzuy • • Italian: Delfino comune • Slovenian: Navadni delfin • Turkish: Tırtak Taxonomic Notes: This is a subpopulation of the Common Dolphin, Delphinus delphis Linnaeus, 1758. See also the global assessment for this species (Hammond et al. 2008) and the assessment of the Mediterranean Sea subpopulation (Bearzi 2003). Assessment Information Red List Category & Criteria: Critically Endangered D ver 3.1 Year Published: 2020 Date Assessed: June 16, 2019 Justification: Fewer than 50 mature individuals exist within this subpopulation. The Common Dolphin Gulf of Corinth subpopulation was estimated to contain an average of 22 (95% CI 16–32) individuals (Santostasi et al. 2016). Even assuming an upper CI limit and 100% being mature individuals (i.e. complete absence of immatures), the abundance of mature individuals would be well below the threshold for classifying this subpopulation as Critically Endangered under criterion D (number mature < 50). As the Common Dolphin Gulf of Corinth subpopulation is isolated from conspecifics (Bearzi et al. 2016), the assessment must be based on unaltered IUCN Red List criteria (Gärdenfors et al. 2001). When assessing subpopulations, the occurrence and status of conspecific units that may affect the risk of extinction within the region should be considered (Taylor 2005). Common Dolphin are not known to occur in the adjacent Gulf of Patras. The closest area with quantitative information on abundance and trends is the Inner Ionian Sea archipelago, where Common Dolphins have declined dramatically (Bearzi et al. 2008, 2006; Piroddi et al. 2011). Therefore, based on the available information, it cannot be assumed that © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Delphinus delphis Gulf of Corinth subpopulation – published in 2020. 1 https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T156206333A170381113.en Common Dolphins surviving in the eastern Ionian Sea may represent a ‘source’ population capable of having a ‘rescue effect’ on the Gulf of Corinth Common Dolphin subpopulation. Sharp declines also have been documented for the Adriatic Sea, with almost complete eradication of a species that was historically abundant (Bearzi et al. 2004). Geographic Range Range Description: The Gulf of Corinth Common Dolphin subpopulation is confined to the central portion of the Gulf of Corinth, Greece, with no evidence of individuals ever crossing the narrow Strait of Rion which connects the Gulf of Corinth to open Mediterranean Sea waters (Frantzis et al. 2003, Bearzi et al. 2016), including across seven years (2011–2017) of intensive survey effort and tracking of dolphin movements (Bonizzoni et al. 2019; also see Figure 1 in the Supplementary Information). Species distribution models based on seven years of intensive surveys (2011–2017; Bonizzoni et al. 2019) predicted a preferred habitat situated in the central/southern sector of the Gulf of Corinth, with hotspots of Common Dolphin distribution encompassing 512 km². The area of occupancy varied between 234 and 311 km² in years 2011–2015, while the total area of occupancy was 708 km2. The extent of occurrence varied between 448 and 651 km² in years 2011–2015. The total extent of occurrence was 1,014 km² (Santostasi et al. 2018). For further information about this species, see Supplementary Material. Country Occurrence: Native, Extant (resident): Greece FAO Marine Fishing Areas: Native: Mediterranean and Black Sea © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Delphinus delphis Gulf of Corinth subpopulation – published in 2020. 2 https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T156206333A170381113.en Population The Gulf of Corinth subpopulation was estimated as 22 Common Dolphins (95% CI 16–32) based on photographic capture-recapture covering the entire known range, conducted between 2011 and 2015 (Santostasi et al. 2016). The Gulf also hosts animals of intermediate Striped x Common Dolphin pigmentation (55 individuals, 95% CI 36–84; Santostasi et al. 2016), recently confirmed to be individuals with mixed ancestry (hereafter 'admixed'; Antoniou et al. 2018). Common Dolphins occur in this gulf only in mixed-species groups with Striped Dolphins (Bonizzoni et al. 2019). Living exclusively within mixed-species groups with the 60-fold more abundant Striped Dolphins likely developed as an adaptation to low Common Dolphin numbers (Frantzis and Herzing 2002). While mixed-species groups may bring advantages to either species, Striped and Common Dolphins are closely related and inter-mating is known to occur in the Gulf of Corinth (Antoniou et al. 2018). The resulting hybridisation and introgression are significant threats for rare species coexisting with more abundant species (Allendorf et al. 2001, Levin 2002). Hybridisation may lead to the local eradication of a population due to genetic swamping (where ‘pure’ species are progressively replaced by hybrids), or demographic swamping (where population growth rates are reduced due to the expression of deleterious alleles and the production of maladaptive hybrids). In the Gulf of Corinth, the production of hybrid offspring (Antoniou et al. 2018) can negatively affect the status of Common Dolphins (Santostasi et al. 2018). There is a clear population boundary between Common Dolphins occurring in the western and the eastern Mediterranean Sea, with additional differentiation in the Ionian Sea (Moura et al. 2013, Natoli et al. 2008). Geographic isolation of Common Dolphins in the Gulf of Corinth has been proposed based on absence of records in the western quarter of the Gulf and in the adjacent Gulf of Patras (Bearzi et al. 2011, Frantzis 2009, Frantzis et al. 2003), as well as consistent absence west of 22°08'30''E across seven years of intensive monitoring (Bearzi et al. 2016, Bonizzoni et al. 2019). Geographic isolation may have led to genetic differentiation, but information is scant. Genetic evidence from three Common Dolphins and 25 Striped Dolphins sampled in the Gulf of Corinth suggested significant differentiation for both species from individuals in the adjacent Ionian Sea and other Mediterranean areas (Gkafas 2011, Gkafas et al. 2007, Moura 2010, Moura et al. 2013). Extinction probabilities were estimated by Santostasi et al. (2018). Based on a quasi-extinction threshold of two mature individuals and a constant growth rate, the subpopulation qualifies as Endangered based on criterion E. The introduction of environmental variability greatly increased the quasi-extinction probability, which becomes ≥0.5 and qualifies the Common Dolphin subpopulation as Critically Endangered based on criterion E. Regarding the expected abundance of mature individuals after three generations, for all the scenarios more than 90% of the projected abundance would fall in the interval 0–50 mature individuals, indicating that, even if the subpopulation does not go extinct, it will remain below the abundance threshold that qualifies it as Critically Endangered. The inclusion of temporal stochasticity led to a ≥ 50% probability of quasi-extinction in all scenarios. The effect of demographic stochasticity is likely present in the study subpopulation, given its small size. Therefore, the subpopulation may be also listed as Critically Endangered under criterion E. Current Population Trend: Unknown © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Delphinus delphis Gulf of Corinth subpopulation – published in 2020. 3 https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T156206333A170381113.en
Recommended publications
  • Anomalously Pigmented Common Dolphins (Delphinus Sp.) Off Northern New Zealand Karen A

    Anomalously Pigmented Common Dolphins (Delphinus Sp.) Off Northern New Zealand Karen A

    Aquatic Mammals 2005, 31(1), 43-51, DOI 10.1578/AM.31.1.2005.43 Anomalously Pigmented Common Dolphins (Delphinus sp.) off Northern New Zealand Karen A. Stockin1 and Ingrid N. Visser2 1Coastal-Marine Research Group, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University, Private Bag 102 904, North Shore MSC, Auckland, New Zealand 2Orca Research Trust, P.O. Box 1233, Whangarei, New Zealand Abstract New Zealand waters is provided by Bernal et al. (2003) who suggested that common dolphins exhib- Anomalous pigmentations have been recorded in iting long rostra, as photographed in New Zealand many cetacean species. However, typically only by Doak (1989; Plates 34A, 34B), are long-beaked one variation is reported from a population at common dolphins. However, as Amaha (1994) and a time (e.g., an albino). Here we record a spec- Jefferson & Van Waerebeek (2002) highlighted, trum of pigmentation from common dolphins neither New Zealand nor Australian common dol- (Delphinus sp.) off northern New Zealand. All- phins neatly fit the morphological description of black, dark-morph, pale-morph, and all-white either D. delphis or D. capensis. In the past, New individuals, as well as variations between these Zealand common dolphins have been identified have been recorded. Pale-coloured pectoral flip- from pigmentation patterns in the field and classi- pers are prevalent, and a number of individuals fied as short-beaked common dolphins (Bräger & with white “helmets” have been observed. Schneider, 1998; Gaskin, 1968; Neumann, 2001; Webb, 1973), although pigmentation alone may not Key Words: common dolphin, Delphinus delphis, be sufficient to positively identity these dolphins to Delphinus capensis, anomalous pigmentation, species.
  • 213 Subpart I—Taking and Importing Marine Mammals

    213 Subpart I—Taking and Importing Marine Mammals

    National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce Pt. 218 regulations or that result in no more PART 218—REGULATIONS GOV- than a minor change in the total esti- ERNING THE TAKING AND IM- mated number of takes (or distribution PORTING OF MARINE MAM- by species or years), NMFS may pub- lish a notice of proposed LOA in the MALS FEDERAL REGISTER, including the asso- ciated analysis of the change, and so- Subparts A–B [Reserved] licit public comment before issuing the Subpart C—Taking Marine Mammals Inci- LOA. dental to U.S. Navy Marine Structure (c) A LOA issued under § 216.106 of Maintenance and Pile Replacement in this chapter and § 217.256 for the activ- Washington ity identified in § 217.250 may be modi- fied by NMFS under the following cir- 218.20 Specified activity and specified geo- cumstances: graphical region. (1) Adaptive Management—NMFS 218.21 Effective dates. may modify (including augment) the 218.22 Permissible methods of taking. existing mitigation, monitoring, or re- 218.23 Prohibitions. porting measures (after consulting 218.24 Mitigation requirements. with Navy regarding the practicability 218.25 Requirements for monitoring and re- porting. of the modifications) if doing so cre- 218.26 Letters of Authorization. ates a reasonable likelihood of more ef- 218.27 Renewals and modifications of Let- fectively accomplishing the goals of ters of Authorization. the mitigation and monitoring set 218.28–218.29 [Reserved] forth in the preamble for these regula- tions. Subpart D—Taking Marine Mammals Inci- (i) Possible sources of data that could dental to U.S. Navy Construction Ac- contribute to the decision to modify tivities at Naval Weapons Station Seal the mitigation, monitoring, or report- Beach, California ing measures in a LOA: (A) Results from Navy’s monitoring 218.30 Specified activity and specified geo- graphical region.
  • Cetaceans: Whales and Dolphins

    Cetaceans: Whales and Dolphins

    CETACEANS: WHALES AND DOLPHINS By Anna Plattner Objective Students will explore the natural history of whales and dolphins around the world. Content will be focused on how whales and dolphins are adapted to the marine environment, the differences between toothed and baleen whales, and how whales and dolphins communicate and find food. Characteristics of specific species of whales will be presented throughout the guide. What is a cetacean? A cetacean is any marine mammal in the order Cetaceae. These animals live their entire lives in water and include whales, dolphins, and porpoises. There are 81 known species of whales, dolphins, and porpoises. The two suborders of cetaceans are mysticetes (baleen whales) and odontocetes (toothed whales). Cetaceans are mammals, thus they are warm blooded, give live birth, have hair when they are born (most lose their hair soon after), and nurse their young. How are cetaceans adapted to the marine environment? Cetaceans have developed many traits that allow them to thrive in the marine environment. They have streamlined bodies that glide easily through the water and help them conserve energy while they swim. Cetaceans breathe through a blowhole, located on the top of their head. This allows them to float at the surface of the water and easily exhale and inhale. Cetaceans also have a thick layer of fat tissue called blubber that insulates their internals organs and muscles. The limbs of cetaceans have also been modified for swimming. A cetacean has a powerful tailfin called a fluke and forelimbs called flippers that help them steer through the water. Most cetaceans also have a dorsal fin that helps them stabilize while swimming.
  • Lagenodelphis Hosei – Fraser's Dolphin

    Lagenodelphis Hosei – Fraser's Dolphin

    Lagenodelphis hosei – Fraser’s Dolphin Assessment Rationale The species is suspected to be widespread and abundant and there have been no reported population declines or major threats identified that could cause a range-wide decline. Globally, it has been listed as Least Concern and, within the assessment region, it is not a conservation priority and therefore, the regional change from Data Deficient to Least Concern reflects the lack of major threats to the species. The most prominent threat to this species globally may be incidental capture in fishing gear and, although this is not considered a major threat to this species in the assessment region, Fraser’s Dolphins have become entangled in anti-shark nets off South Africa’s east coast. This threat should be monitored. Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Regional population effects: Fraser’s Dolphin has a widespread, pantropical distribution, and although its National Red List status (2004) Data Deficient seasonal migration patterns in southern Africa remain Reasons for change Non-genuine change: inconclusive, no barriers to dispersal have been New information recognised, thus rescue effects are possible. Global Red List status (2012) Least Concern TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None Distribution The distribution of L. hosei is suggested to be pantropical CITES listing (2003) Appendix II (Robison & Craddock 1983), and is widespread across the Endemic No Pacific and Atlantic Oceans (Ross 1984), and the species has been documented in the Indian Ocean off South This species is occasionally Africa’s east coast (Perrin et al. 1973), in Sri Lanka misidentified as the Striped Dolphin (Stenella (Leatherwood & Reeves 1989), Madagascar (Perrin et al.
  • Diet of the Striped Dolphin, Stenella Coeruleoalba, in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean

    Diet of the Striped Dolphin, Stenella Coeruleoalba, in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications, Agencies and Staff of the U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 3-2008 Diet of the Striped Dolphin, Stenella coeruleoalba, in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean William F. Perrin Kelly M. Robertson William A. Walker Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdeptcommercepub Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Perrin, William F.; Robertson, Kelly M.; and Walker, William A., "Diet of the Striped Dolphin, Stenella coeruleoalba, in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean" (2008). Publications, Agencies and Staff of the U.S. Department of Commerce. 23. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdeptcommercepub/23 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Commerce at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications, Agencies and Staff of the U.S. Department of Commerce by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS T O F C E N O M M T M R E A R P C E E D MARCH 2008 U N A I C T I E R D E M ST A AT E S OF DIET OF THE STRIPED DOLPHIN, Stenella coeruleoalba, IN THE EASTERN TROPICAL PACIFIC OCEAN William F. Perrin Kelly M. Robertson William A. Walker NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-418 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), organized in 1970, has evolved into an agency which establishes national policies and manages and conserves our oceanic, coastal, and atmospheric resources.
  • Bottlenose Dolphin Abundance in the NW Mediterranean: Addressing Heterogeneity in Distribution

    Bottlenose Dolphin Abundance in the NW Mediterranean: Addressing Heterogeneity in Distribution

    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 275: 275–287, 2004 Published July 14 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Bottlenose dolphin abundance in the NW Mediterranean: addressing heterogeneity in distribution Jaume Forcada1,*, Manel Gazo2, Alex Aguilar2, Joan Gonzalvo2, Mar Fernández-Contreras2 1British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, United Kingdom 2Department of Animal Biology (Vertebrates), Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, 08071 Barcelona, Spain ABSTRACT: Line-transect estimators were developed to assess abundance of coastal dolphins Tur- siops truncatus and Stenella coeruleoalba encountered in low densities during aerial sighting sur- veys. The analysis improved on conventional approaches by objectively combining data from differ- ent species, survey areas and other covariates affecting dolphin detectability. Model selection and multimodel inference allowed robust estimates of precision in accounting for covariate selection uncertainty. These methods were used to estimate bottlenose dolphin abundance in NE Mediter- ranean waters that included a putative subpopulation in the Balearic Islands. Total abundance was estimated as 7654 (coefficient of variation, CV = 0.47; 95% CI = 1608 to 15 766) and the abundance in inshore waters of the Balearic Islands varied from 727 (CV = 0.47; 95% CI = 149 to 1481) dolphins in spring 2002 to 1333 (CV = 0.44; 95% CI = 419 to 2617) dolphins in autumn 2002, with an average estimate of 1030 (CV = 0.35; 95% CI = 415 to 1849). The results do not support an exclusively coastal Balearic Island subpopulation, but they strongly indicate that the islands contain critical habitats required for the conservation of the species. Given the observed decline of the species during the last few decades, conservation-oriented management should focus on reducing or eliminating adverse fishing interactions while key areas are protected from encroachment produced by human development.
  • Stenella Coeruleoalba) from the Mediterranean Sea (Southern Italy)

    Stenella Coeruleoalba) from the Mediterranean Sea (Southern Italy)

    Environmental Pollution 116 (2002) 265–271 www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol Accumulation and tissue distribution of mercury and selenium in striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) from the Mediterranean Sea (southern Italy) N. Cardellicchio *, A. Decataldo, A. Di Leo, A. Misino CNR — Istituto Sperimentale Talassografico, via Roma 3, I-74100 Taranto, Italy Received 13 October 2000; accepted 6 March 2001 Abstract Tissues and organs from Stenella coeruleoalba stranded along the Apulian coasts (southern Italy) during the period April–July 1991 were analyzed for their mercury and selenium content. Analysis showed considerable variations in the mercury concentration in the examined organs and tissues. The highest concentrations of mercury were found in the liver (from 2.27 to 374.50 mggÀ1 wet wt.). After the liver, lung, kidney, muscle and brain were the most contaminated, while the lowest mercury contamination was found in the melon. As mercury, the liver also showed the highest selenium levels. Liver samples were also analyzed for their methyl mercury contents. The role of selenium in detoxification process of methyl mercury has been discussed. Mercury concentrations related to geographic variations and pollution of the marine environment have been examined. The possible implications between mercury accumulation and dolphin death have also been discussed. # 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Mercury; Selenium; Mediterranean; Dolphin; Accumulation 1. Introduction monitoring researches on stranded animals both in the anatomo-pathological and in chemico-toxicological The study of mercury accumulation in dolphins is field have been carried out (Andre´ et al., 1991; Leonzio particularly interesting from the ecotoxicological point et al., 1992; Augier et al., 1993b; Cardellicchio, 1995; of view because of the position of these organisms at the Monaci et al., 1998; Capelli et al., 2000; Cardellicchio et end of the trophic networks.
  • Z Dolphin Rescue

    Z Dolphin Rescue

    z Annual newsletter of the Blue World Institute for Marine Research and Conservation 2007. bottlenose dolphin can weigh up to 350kg which is normally supported by the water. The animal Dolphin rescue should be supported in a stretcher where possible and not left on any hard surfaces, this may dam- age the fragile bone structure of the ribs and the animal’s internal organs. Untrained help therefore from concerned citizens, although understand- able, should be avoided. Veterinary help should applied only by those individuals that have been trained on an internationally recognised cetacean medical course. The serious issue related to the transmission of diseases in cetacean species and populations and to their handling has been dis- cussed in detail at the 59th Annual Meeting of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission, which Croatia has recently joined. Blue World is a professional scientific organisation regularly participating in workshops and meetings organised by European and world experts trained in cetacean veterinary medicine. The above rec- ommendations follow the international standards of present knowledge on cetacean and dolphin Dolphin rescue is an unusually hard and extremely advice remains the same in this instance: please rescue techniques. In the past, Blue World has complex procedure. Unfortunately it is rarely suc- leave the animals alone, not to catch them or try proposed the creation of a national rescue centre cessful. Any attempt to rescue a whale or dolphin to get in contact with them, not to go into the for endangered and protected marine organisms, should be only carried out by expert personnel sea and swim with them, the best human help to particularly marine turtles and cetaceans, and a specially trained in this procedure.
  • Miyazaki, N. Growth and Reproduction of Stenella Coeruleoalba Off The

    Miyazaki, N. Growth and Reproduction of Stenella Coeruleoalba Off The

    GROWTH AND REPRODUCTION OF STENELLA COERULEOALBA OFF THE PACIFIC COAST OF JAPAN NOBUYUKI MIYAZAKI Department of Marine Sciences, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa ABSTRACT This study is based on data from about five thousand specimens of S. coeruleoalba. Mean length at birth is 100 cm. Mean lengths at the age of 1 year and 2 years are 166 cm and 180 cm, respectively. The species starts feed­ ing on solid food at the age of 0.25 year (or 135 cm). Mean weaning age is about 1.5 years (or 174 cm). Mean testis weights at the attainment of puberty and sexual maturity of males are 6.8 g and 15.5 g, respectively. Mean ages at the attainment of puberty and sexual maturity of males are 6. 7 years (or 210 cm) and 8.7 years (or 219 cm), respectively. Females attain puberty and sexual maturity on the average at 7.1 years (or 209 cm) and 8.8 years (or 216 cm), respectively. There are three mating seasons in a year, from Feb­ ruary to May, from July to September, and in December. Mating season may occur at an interval from 4 to 5 months. The overall sex ratio (male/female) is 1.14. Sex ratio changes with age, from near parity at birth, indicating higher mortality rates for males. INTRODUCTION The striped dolphin, Stenella coeruleoalba are caught annually by the driving fishery or hand harpoons in the Pacific coast ofJapan (Ohsumi 1972, Miyazaki et al. 1974). According to Ohsumi (1972), Miyazaki et al. (1974), and Nishiwaki (1975), the striped dolphins caught in the Pacific coast of Japan are suggested to belong to one population.
  • Marine Mammal Taxonomy

    Marine Mammal Taxonomy

    Marine Mammal Taxonomy Kingdom: Animalia (Animals) Phylum: Chordata (Animals with notochords) Subphylum: Vertebrata (Vertebrates) Class: Mammalia (Mammals) Order: Cetacea (Cetaceans) Suborder: Mysticeti (Baleen Whales) Family: Balaenidae (Right Whales) Balaena mysticetus Bowhead whale Eubalaena australis Southern right whale Eubalaena glacialis North Atlantic right whale Eubalaena japonica North Pacific right whale Family: Neobalaenidae (Pygmy Right Whale) Caperea marginata Pygmy right whale Family: Eschrichtiidae (Grey Whale) Eschrichtius robustus Grey whale Family: Balaenopteridae (Rorquals) Balaenoptera acutorostrata Minke whale Balaenoptera bonaerensis Arctic Minke whale Balaenoptera borealis Sei whale Balaenoptera edeni Byrde’s whale Balaenoptera musculus Blue whale Balaenoptera physalus Fin whale Megaptera novaeangliae Humpback whale Order: Cetacea (Cetaceans) Suborder: Odontoceti (Toothed Whales) Family: Physeteridae (Sperm Whale) Physeter macrocephalus Sperm whale Family: Kogiidae (Pygmy and Dwarf Sperm Whales) Kogia breviceps Pygmy sperm whale Kogia sima Dwarf sperm whale DOLPHIN R ESEARCH C ENTER , 58901 Overseas Hwy, Grassy Key, FL 33050 (305) 289 -1121 www.dolphins.org Family: Platanistidae (South Asian River Dolphin) Platanista gangetica gangetica South Asian river dolphin (also known as Ganges and Indus river dolphins) Family: Iniidae (Amazon River Dolphin) Inia geoffrensis Amazon river dolphin (boto) Family: Lipotidae (Chinese River Dolphin) Lipotes vexillifer Chinese river dolphin (baiji) Family: Pontoporiidae (Franciscana)
  • Review of Small Cetaceans. Distribution, Behaviour, Migration and Threats

    Review of Small Cetaceans. Distribution, Behaviour, Migration and Threats

    Review of Small Cetaceans Distribution, Behaviour, Migration and Threats by Boris M. Culik Illustrations by Maurizio Wurtz, Artescienza Marine Mammal Action Plan / Regional Seas Reports and Studies no. 177 Published by United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Review of Small Cetaceans. Distribution, Behaviour, Migration and Threats. 2004. Compiled for CMS by Boris M. Culik. Illustrations by Maurizio Wurtz, Artescienza. UNEP / CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 343 pages. Marine Mammal Action Plan / Regional Seas Reports and Studies no. 177 Produced by CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany in collaboration with UNEP Coordination team Marco Barbieri, Veronika Lenarz, Laura Meszaros, Hanneke Van Lavieren Editing Rüdiger Strempel Design Karina Waedt The author Boris M. Culik is associate Professor The drawings stem from Prof. Maurizio of Marine Zoology at the Leibnitz Institute of Wurtz, Dept. of Biology at Genova Univer- Marine Sciences at Kiel University (IFM-GEOMAR) sity and illustrator/artist at Artescienza. and works free-lance as a marine biologist. Contact address: Contact address: Prof. Dr. Boris Culik Prof. Maurizio Wurtz F3: Forschung / Fakten / Fantasie Dept. of Biology, Genova University Am Reff 1 Viale Benedetto XV, 5 24226 Heikendorf, Germany 16132 Genova, Italy Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] www.fh3.de www.artescienza.org © 2004 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) / Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made.
  • Marine Mammals of British Columbia Current Status, Distribution and Critical Habitats

    Marine Mammals of British Columbia Current Status, Distribution and Critical Habitats

    Marine Mammals of British Columbia Current Status, Distribution and Critical Habitats John Ford and Linda Nichol Cetacean Research Program Pacific Biological Station Nanaimo, BC Outline • Brief (very) introduction to marine mammals of BC • Historical occurrence of whales in BC • Recent efforts to determine current status of cetacean species • Recent attempts to identify Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered species • Overview of pinnipeds in BC Marine Mammals of British Columbia - 25 Cetaceans, 5 Pinnipeds, 1 Mustelid Baleen Whales of British Columbia Family Balaenopteridae – Rorquals (5 spp) Blue Whale Balaenoptera musculus SARA Status = Endangered Fin Whale Balaenoptera physalus = Threatened = Spec. Concern Sei Whale Balaenoptera borealis Family Balaenidae – Right Whales (1 sp) Minke Whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata North Pacific Right Whale Eubalaena japonica Humpback Whale Megaptera novaeangliae Family Eschrichtiidae– Grey Whales (1 sp) Grey Whale Eschrichtius robustus Toothed Whales of British Columbia Family Physeteridae – Sperm Whales (3 spp) Sperm Whale Physeter macrocephalus Pygmy Sperm Whale Kogia breviceps Dwarf Sperm Whale Kogia sima Family Ziphiidae – Beaked Whales (4 spp) Hubbs’ Beaked Whale Mesoplodon carlhubbsii Stejneger’s Beaked Whale Mesoplodon stejnegeri Baird’s Beaked Whale Berardius bairdii Cuvier’s Beaked Whale Ziphius cavirostris Toothed Whales of British Columbia Family Delphinidae – Dolphins (9 spp) Pacific White-sided Dolphin Lagenorhynchus obliquidens Killer Whale Orcinus orca Striped Dolphin Stenella