Cultural Facilities Corporation Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural Facilities Corporation Annual Report CULTURAL FACILITIES CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT 2011-2012 Cultural Facilities Corporation – 2011-2012 Annual Report CULTURAL FACILITIES CORPORATION PO Box 939 CIVIC SQUARE ACT 2608 ABN : 88187240846 Enquiries about this publication should be directed to : Telephone : (02) 6205 0340 www.museumsandgalleries.act.gov.au www.canberratheatrecentre.com.au Page | ii Cultural Facilities Corporation – 2011-2012 Annual Report Table of Contents Transmittal Certificate vi Section A – Performance and Financial Management Reporting A.1 The Organisation 9 A.2 Overview 13 A.3 Highlights 15 A.4 Outlook 21 A.5 Management Discussion and Analysis 24 A.6 Financial Report 24 A.7 Statement of Performance 24 A.8 Strategic Indicators 24 A.9 Analysis of Agency Performance 25 A.10 Triple Bottom Line Report 76 Section B – Consultation and Scrutiny Reporting B.1 Community Engagement 79 B.2 Internal and External Scrutiny 79 B.3 Legislative Assembly Committee Inquiries and Reports 79 B.4 Legislation Report 79 Section C – Legislative and Policy Based Reporting C.1 Risk Management and Internal Audit 81 C.2 Fraud Prevention 82 C.3 Public Interest Disclosure 82 C.4 Freedom of Information 82 C.5 Internal Accountability 84 C.6 HR Performance 86 C.7 Staffing Profile 87 C.8 Learning and Development 89 Page | iii Cultural Facilities Corporation – 2011-2012 Annual Report C.9 Workplace Health and Safety 89 C.10 Workplace Relations 91 C.11 Human Rights Act 2004 92 C.12 Strategic Bushfire Management Plan (SBMP) 92 C.13 Strategic Asset Management 92 C.14 Capital Works 94 C.15 Government Contracting 96 C.16 Community Grants/Assistance/Sponsorship 100 C.17 Territory Records 100 C.18 Commissioner for the Environment 101 C.19 Ecologically Sustainable Development 102 C.20 Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Reduction policies 104 and programs C.21 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Reporting 104 C.22 ACT Multicultural Strategy 2010-2013 104 C.23 ACT Strategic Plan for Positive Ageing 2010-2014 105 C.24 ACT Women’s Plan 2010-2015 106 C.25 Model Litigant Guidelines 108 C.26 Use of terrorism powers 108 C.27 Notices of noncompliance 108 Page | iv Cultural Facilities Corporation – 2011-2012 Annual Report Appendices 1 Information relating to the Board of the CFC 110 2 CFC Governance Documents 113 3 Senior Managers of the CFC 138 4 Organisational Structure as at 30 June 2012 139 5 Advisory Committees 140 6 Facilities and Business/Activities Under Management 146 7 Canberra Theatre Centre Venues – Graph showing genres 148 of presentations 8 ACT Museums and Galleries – Schedule of exhibitions, 149 programs and events 2011-12 9 Canberra Museum and Gallery – Acquisitions (purchases 156 and donations) in 2011-12 10 Major funding, sponsorship and support 157 11 Staff Development 159 Attachment 1 2011-12 Financial and Performance Statements and 161 Management Discussion and Analysis Abbreviations and Acronyms 232 Compliance Index 234 Page | v Cultural Facilities Corporation – 2011-2012 Annual Report Page | vi Cultural Facilities Corporation – 2011-2012 Annual Report Page | vii Cultural Facilities Corporation – 2011-2012 Annual Report Section A – Performance and Financial Management Reporting Page | 8 Cultural Facilities Corporation – 2011-2012 Annual Report A.1 The Organisation A.1.1 Role, including functions and services provided The Cultural Facilities Corporation (CFC) was established under the Cultural Facilities Corporation Act 1997 (the CFC Act), which came into operation as from 1 November 1997. The functions of the CFC, as set out in the CFC Act (Section 6) are : • to manage, develop, present, co-ordinate and promote cultural activities at designated locations and other places in the ACT; • to establish and research collections; • to conserve and exhibit collections in the possession or under the control of the CFC; • to undertake activities, in co-operation with other people if appropriate, to exercise its other functions; and • to exercise other functions given to the CFC under this Act or another Territory Law. The CFC Act (Section 7) requires that the CFC, in exercising its functions, must consider : • any cultural policies or priorities of the Executive known to the CFC; and • other cultural activities in the ACT. The CFC is responsible for : • the Canberra Theatre Centre; • the Canberra Museum and Gallery (CMAG); • the Nolan Collection Gallery @ CMAG; and • three Historic Places : Lanyon, Calthorpes’ House and Mugga Mugga. The CFC’s functions therefore include the performing arts, the visual arts, social history and cultural heritage management. The organisation delivers a range of cultural services to the community by providing activities such as theatre presentations, exhibitions, and education and community programs, and through conserving and presenting significant aspects of the ACT’s cultural heritage. The CFC Act was amended with effect from 5 June 2012. This amendment resulted from a recommendation made in the Loxton review of the arts. The amendment removed responsibility for Civic Square from the functions of the CFC. This formalised arrangements whereby the Territory and Municipal Services Directorate manages and maintains Civic Square, including by maintaining all aspects of its fabric (the fountain, paving, grassed areas etc.) and by managing bookings for use of the Square. The CFC will, however, continue to undertake certain activities in relation to Civic Square; for example, joint programs with other organisations located on Civic Square such as Craft ACT and the Civic Library; and participation in planning studies for the Civic Square precinct. Additional information about the CFC can be found at the following websites : • www.canberratheatrecentre.com.au covering the Canberra Theatre Centre; and • www.museumsandgalleries.act.gov.au covering CMAG, the Nolan Collection Gallery @ CMAG and the Historic Places. Page | 9 Cultural Facilities Corporation – 2011-2012 Annual Report A.1.2 Mission and values of the CFC The CFC’s five-year Strategic Plan, covering the period 2011-16, provides the overarching framework for the organisation’s planning activities, including for the development of its annual corporate plans. The Strategic Plan identifies mission or purpose statements for the organisation as a whole, as well as for its two program delivery divisions : the Canberra Theatre Centre and ACT Museums and Galleries (which in turn comprises two sections : CMAG and the Historic Places). The mission or purpose statements identified in the Strategic Plan are supported by statements as to what the CFC is seeking to achieve in a number of “areas of focus”, as set out below. A.1.2.1 Mission/Purpose for the CFC To enable our distinctive institutions to provide enriching cultural experiences that contribute to Canberra’s identity Area of focus What we want to achieve Strategy and planning A clear direction for our future Governance An accountable, resilient and dynamic organisation Human resources An employer of choice for staff and volunteers Financial management Long-term financial sustainability Infrastructure and systems Support for the delivery of high quality cultural experiences Communication Engagement of our stakeholders Growing and leveraging off our assets Growth in targeted areas where we can add value A.1.2.2 Mission/Purpose for the Canberra Theatre Centre To be Canberra’s leading performing arts centre Area of focus What we want to achieve Programming A diverse program that creates a leadership position for the Canberra Theatre Centre and an identity for Canberra Marketing and audience development A loyal and growing audience Community initiatives Connect the whole community with the performing arts Growing and leveraging off our assets A performing arts centre for the future Page | 10 Cultural Facilities Corporation – 2011-2012 Annual Report A.1.2.3 Mission/Purpose for ACT Museums and Galleries To engage our community by presenting Canberra’s stories, diverse visual culture and heritage Area of focus What we want to achieve Programming, story-telling, interpretation Programming that reflects Canberra’s unique identity Marketing and audience development A loyal and growing audience Stewardship of assets Places and collections that allow us to tell the many stories of Canberra Growing and leveraging off our assets Growth in targeted areas where we can add value A.1.2.4 Values The CFC has identified a set of values that support its mission statements and underpin its activities. These values are as follows. • We regard cultural activity as essential for a vibrant, diverse and healthy community, and vital for social and economic development. • We recognise that cultural activity makes a valuable contribution to the promotion of the ACT as an attractive destination for business investment and tourism. • We seek to engage the community in a greater understanding of the value of the arts and our cultural heritage. • We are committed to ensuring that the cultural and heritage places and collections, which we hold in trust for the broader community, are researched and interpreted, and that they are both made accessible now and are conserved for future generations. • We acknowledge and respect the cultural diversity of the region and the richness this brings to the ACT’s arts and heritage. • We acknowledge that our staff and volunteers are highly valued assets of the CFC and continue to recognise their contribution and further develop their skills. • We place major importance on maintaining professional standards in the management of our facilities and on delivering
Recommended publications
  • You Can't Be What You Can't See— Women
    Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory 49th Presiding Officers and Clerks Conference Wellington, New Zealand 8-13 July 2018 You can’t be what you can’t see— Women in the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory Paper to be presented by Joy Burch, MLA, Speaker of the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory Page 1 of 10 ‘Any way you look at it there are many, many women who are capable of that job of leadership and making an impact at every level of government and I think we should see more”1 “Women in politics do make a difference and they can change people’s perceptions of politics – they also change the structural discrimination of old-style political systems and parliamentary conventions”2 1 Rosemary Follett, ‘Rosemary Follett and Kate Carnell reunited to sight sexism in politics’ Canberra Times 7th March 2015. 2 Katy Gallagher, ACT Chief Minister, katygallagher.net/blog blog post, 1st October 2014. Page 2 of 10 Introduction Women have played an important and prominent role in the Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory since its establishment in 1989. The ACT was the first state or territory to have a woman as its Head of Government. In the Second Assembly, the positions of Speaker, Chief Minister and Leader of the Opposition were all held by women. Perhaps most significantly, at the Territory election for the Ninth Assembly in 2016, thirteen women were elected to the Assembly. It was the first time in Australian history that a majority of women had been elected to a parliament and one of the first jurisdictions in the world to have done so.3 It was also notable that the voters of the ACT returned this result even though only 36 percent of the total 140 candidates that stood for election were women.
    [Show full text]
  • MS 65 Papers of Studio One
    MS 65 Papers of Studio One Summary Administrative Information Scope and Content Biographical Note Series List and Description Box Description Folder Description Summary Creator: Studio One staff Title: Papers of Studio One Date range: 1985-2000 Reference number: MS 65 50 Boxes + 13 ring binders + 1 oversized Extent: box Administrative Information Access See National Gallery of Australia Research Library reference desk librarians. Provenance The papers were salvaged by Roger Butler, Senior Curator of Australian Prints and Drawing at the National Gallery of Australia in early 2000 after they were had been assigned for disposal. Scope and Content Series 1 of the collection comprises 42 boxes of material directly related to the administrative functions of a small, Canberra based, print editioning organisation and spans 17 years from 1985 to 2002. Within this series are 13 ring binders that contain a variety of media including negatives, photographs, slides and prints. Included in this series is an oversized box containing outsized material. Series 2 consists of financial records. The collection content includes correspondence; funding applications; board meeting agendas and minutes; reports; job cards (print editioning forms) and printing contracts, with financial records in the second series. Various artists represented in the National Gallery of Australia Collection used the Studio One editioning services. These include George Gittoes, Rosalie Gascoigne, Dennis Nona, Treahna Hamm, Jane Bradhurst, Pamela Challis, Ray Arnold, Lesbia Thorpe (Lee Baldwin) and Bruno Leti. This collection also documents, through records of correspondence, workshop details and job cards, the development of relationships with Indigenous artists through print workshops and print editioning as convened by Theo Tremblay and Basil Hall, including Melville Island, Munupi Arts and Crafts, Cairns TAFE, and Turkey Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Act Law Society Annual Report 2019-20 Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory
    ACT LAW SOCIETY ANNUAL REPORT 2019-20 LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY ABN 60 181 327 029 Level 4, 1 Farrell Place, Canberra City ACT 2601 PO Box 1562, Canberra ACT 2601 | DX 5623 Canberra Phone (02) 6274 0300 | [email protected] www.actlawsociety.asn.au Executive President Chris Donohue Vice Presidents Elizabeth Carroll Peter Cain Secretary George Marques Treasurer Sama Kahn Council-appointed Member Mark Tigwell Immediate Past President Sarah Avery Councillors Radmila Andric Rahul Bedi Farzana Choudhury Timothy Dingwall Alan Hill Gavin Lee Sage Leslie Susan Platis Mark Tigwell Angus Tye Staff Chief Executive Officer Simone Carton Professional Standards Manager Rob Reis Finance & Business Services Manager Lea McLean Executive Secretary Nicole Crossley Professional Standards Committee Secretary Linda Mackay Research Officer Tien Pham Professional Development Officer Carissa Webster Communications Officer Nicole Karman Committee Administrator Tanya Holt Bookkeeper Kathleen Lui Receptionist & LAB Administrator Robyn Guilfoyle Administration Support Janette Graham Leonnie Borzecki © This publication is copyright and no part of it may be reproduced without the consent of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory. The Law Society acknowledges the Ngunnawal and Ngambri peoples, who are the traditional custodians of the land on which our building is located. ii ACT LAW SOCIETY ANNUAL REPORT 2019-20 PRESIDENT’S REPORT CEO’S REPORT CORPORATE OVERVIEW Role of the Law Society ......................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Standing Committee Inquiry Into the Immigration Bridge Australia Proposal
    Joint Standing Committee Inquiry into the Immigration Bridge Australia Proposal National Trust of Australia (ACT) ‐ Response Introduction The ACT National Trust (‘the Trust’) appreciates the opportunity to present its views to the Joint Committee on the proposed footbridge to be erected over Lake Burley Griffin from Kurrajong Point west of the southern approach to Commonwealth Avenue Bridge to Hospital Point. The Trust strongly objects to the current proposal of constructing a bridge across the West Basin of Lake Burley Griffin. This objection has the full consensus of the Trust’s Heritage Committee and members of its Expert Advisory Panel. Collectively these people represent expertise and long experience in: heritage management & assessment, architecture, landscape architecture, urban design and history. The reasons for our objection are outlined below. It should be noted however that the National Trust has no objection to a more suitably designed commemorative place celebrating the contributions that immigrants have made and still make to the culture of Australia. 1. National Trust The ACT National Trust, with a membership of 1,600 is part of the National Trust movement in Australia representing 80,000 members. Our charter states: • Our Vision is to be an independent and expert community leader in the conservation of our cultural and natural heritage. • Our Purpose is to foster public knowledge about, and promote the conservation of, places and objects that are significant to our heritage. • Our Organisation is a not‐for‐profit organisation of people interested in understanding and conserving heritage places and objects of local, national and international significance in the ACT region.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Review of Recreational Facilities Around Lake Burley Griffin Final Report
    STRATEGIC REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AROUND LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR ACT ROWING STRATEGIC REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AROUND LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN - FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR ACT ROWING PAGE 2 OF 75 | CB RICHARD ELLIS (V) PTY LTD | CANBERRA | NOVEMBER 10 | MID 182439 STRATEGIC REVIEW OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AROUND LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN - FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR ACT ROWING Table of Contents Table of Figures EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 FIGURE 1 – LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN WITHIN A LOCAL CONTEXT FIGURE 2 - WALTER BURLEY GRIFFIN'S LAKE 1 INTRODUCTION 5 FIGURE 3 - WATER DEPTHS ACROSS LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN 2 LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN 6 FIGURE 4 - THE DIFFERENT CHARACTERS OF THE LAKE - YARRALUMLA BEACH 3 METHODOLOGY 10 FIGURE 5 - THE DIFFERENT CHARACTERS OF THE LAKE - COMMONWEALTH PLACE FIGURE 6 - LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN IN AN ACT CONTEXT 4 RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES ON AND AROUND LAKE BURLEY GRIFFIN 11 FIGURE 7 - MURRAY COD AND LATHAMS/JAPANESE SNIPE 5 CONSULTATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS 12 FIGURE 8 - METHODOLOGY FIGURE 9- MAIN SHARED RECREATIONAL PATHS AROUND THE LAKE (IN BLUE) 6 KEY THEMES IDENTIFIED FROM CONSULTATION 13 FIGURE 10 - 2008 BICYCLE TRAFFIC COUNTS 7 IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING FACILITIES 15 FIGURE 11 - NARROW PATH AT LENNOX GARDENS 8 OPTIONS TO ADDRESS PROPOSED ACTIONS 26 FIGURE 12 - DISTRIBUTION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES (NCA) FIGURE 13 - TOILETS AT LOTUS BAY 9 CONCLUSION 36 FIGURE 14 - PICNIC FACILITIES - LENNOX GARDENS APPENDIX 1 – SUMMARY OF RELEVANT POLICY DOCUMENTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR RECREATIONAL FIGURE 15 -
    [Show full text]
  • 10 MAY 2019 Friday, 10 May 2019
    NINTH ASSEMBLY 10 MAY 2019 www.hansard.act.gov.au Friday, 10 May 2019 Distinguished visitors ............................................................................................... 1507 Visitors ..................................................................................................................... 1508 Self-government in the territory—30th anniversary ................................................ 1508 Mark of reconciliation—gift of possum skin cloak (Statement by Speaker) ........... 1522 Adjournment ............................................................................................................ 1522 Legislative Assembly for the ACT Friday, 10 May 2019 MADAM SPEAKER (Ms J Burch) took the chair at 10 am, made a formal recognition that the Assembly was meeting on the lands of the traditional custodians, and asked members to stand in silence and pray or reflect on their responsibilities to the people of the Australian Capital Territory. Distinguished visitors MADAM SPEAKER: Members, before I call the Chief Minister I would like to acknowledge the presence in the gallery of a number of former members. I would like to acknowledge: Chris Bourke Bernard Collaery Helen Watchirs, representing the late Terry Connolly Greg Cornwell AO Rosemary Follett AO Ellnor Grassby Harold Hird OAM Lucy Horodny Gary Humphries AO Dorothy and son Kevin Jeffery, representing the late Val Jeffery Norm Jensen Sandy Kaine, representing the late Trevor Kaine Louise Littlewood Karin MacDonald Roberta McRae OAM Michael Moore AM Richard Mulcahy Paul Osborne Mary Porter AM David Prowse Marion Reilly Dave Rugendyke Brendan Smyth 1507 10 May 2019 Legislative Assembly for the ACT Bill Stefaniak AM Helen Szuty Andrew Whitecross Bill Wood On behalf of all members, I extend a warm welcome to you. I welcome all former members joining us in this quite significant celebration. Visitors MADAM SPEAKER: I would also like to acknowledge the two former clerks, Don Piper and Mark McRae.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard, 9 March 1995
    DEBATES OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY HANSARD 9 March 1995 9 March 1995 Thursday, 9 March 1995 Notice convening meeting............................................................................... 1 Swearing-in of members.................................................................................. 2 Election of Speaker......................................................................................... 3 Election of Chief Minister .............................................................................. 4 Leadership of Australian Labor Party .............................................................. 6 Leader of the Opposition ................................................................................ 7 Statements by members................................................................................... 9 Election of Deputy Speaker ............................................................................ 11 Authority to record, broadcast and photograph proceedings............................ 11 Subordinate legislation and commencement provisions.................................... 12 Committees..................................................................................................... 18 Date and hour of next meeting ........................................................................ 36 Adjournment................................................................................................... 36 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY PARLIAMENTARY
    [Show full text]
  • Member Biographies Eighth Assembly
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY MEMBERS OF THE EIGHTH ASSEMBLY NOVEMBER 2012-OCTOBER 2016 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY EIGHTH ASSEMBLY – LIST OF MEMBERS Historical document published in November 2012 which includes biographical information provided by members at the commencement of the Eighth Assembly, changes to ministerial and shadow ministerial responsibilities from November 2012- October 2016 have been updated within the following table. NAME ELECTORATE PARTY Mr Andrew Barr Molonglo Australian Labor Party Chief Minister (11/12/2014-31/10/2016) Deputy Chief Minister (7/11/2012-10/12/2014) Minister for Community Services (9/11/2012-6/7/2014) Minister for Economic Development (9/11/2012-31/10/2016) Minister for Housing (7/7/2014-20/1/2015) Minister for Sport and Recreation (9/11/2012-6/7/2014) Minister for Urban Renewal (21/1/2015-31/10/2016) Minister for Tourism and Events (9/11/2012-31/10/2016) Treasurer (9/11/2012-31/10/2016) Ms Yvette Berry Ginninderra Australian Labor Party Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (21/1/2015-22/1/2016) Minister for Community Services (21/1/2015-22/1/2016) Minister for Housing (21/1/2015-22/1/2016) Minister for Housing, Community Services and Social Inclusion (22/1/2016-31/10/2016) Minister for Multicultural Affairs (21/1/2015-22/1/2016) Minister for Multicultural and Youth Affairs (22/1/2016- 31/10/2016) Minister for Sport and Recreation (22/1/2016-31/10/2016) Minister for Women (21/1/2015-31/10/2016) Minister assisting the
    [Show full text]
  • Almost 30Years:The Story So Far Legislative Assembly
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY ALMOST 30 YEARS: THE STORY SO FAR LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE ACT AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2018 Table of Contents Almost 30 Years: The story so far ................................................................................................... 1 Legislative Assembly Firsts .............................................................................................................. 1 Speakers .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Chief Ministers ................................................................................................................................ 2 Deputy Chief Ministers ................................................................................................................... 2 Ministers ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Leaders of the Opposition ............................................................................................................... 6 Members ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Women in Parliament ..................................................................................................................... 8 Legislation ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canberra Yacht Club Submission
    Canberra Yacht Club PO Box 7169 Yarralumla 2600 Tel (02) 6273 4777 Fax (02) 6273 7177 Mariner Pl, Yarralumla ACT email: [email protected] Website: canberrayachtclub.com.au ( ACT Sailing Inc T/A) ABN 93 090 967 514 26 March 2009 Committee Secretary Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories Department of House of Representatives PO Box 6021 Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 AUSTRALIA JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AND EXTERNAL TERRITORIES INQUIRY INTO THE IMMIGRATION BRIDGE AUSTRALIA PROPOSAL CANBERRA YACHT CLUB (CYC) SUBMISSION The enclosed submission from the Canberra Yacht Club is forwarded for the Joint Standing Committee’s consideration. The Canberra Yacht Club welcomes the Committee’s inquiry and the opportunity to make this submission. The opportunity to amplify the comments in the submission at the Committee’s hearing is also welcomed. Graham Giles Commodore Enclosure: CYC Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories Inquiry into the Immigration Bridge Australia Proposal JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE ON THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AND EXTERNAL TERRITORIES INQUIRY INTO THE IMMIGRATION BRIDGE AUSTRALIA PROPOSAL CANBERRA YACHT CLUB SUBMISSION Summary The Canberra Yacht Club (CYC) supports the proposition that there is a strong case for the construction in Canberra of a very significant national memorial to celebrate all that immigration has added to Australia’s national life. However, as a major user of the lake the CYC’s position regarding the Immigration Bridge proposal is that: a the proposal that a bridge be constructed at this location is derived from unvalidated Griffin Legacy Strategic Initiatives, and has not been subject to the proper scrutiny, including public consultation, that is warranted for such a significant infrastructure item.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLANNING of COMMEMORATIVE WORKS in CANBERRA on Death and Sublation
    THE PLANNING OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS IN CANBERRA On Death and Sublation Quentin Stevens1,2 1RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, 2University College London, London, UK INTRODUCTION Decisions about the location and design of public memorials in capital cities shape national identity. They involve large financial and political investments, signature works by leading artists and architects, and permanent changes to some of the most prominent real estate in the nation. It is thus unusual that there has been little academic analysis of the design approaches and the decision-making processes that shapes the commemorative landscapes of capital cities. Commemorative planning plays a very high-level role in shaping Australia’s capital city, Canberra, proactively through physical masterplans and landscaping schemes for the public realm, reactively through review processes for individual commemorative proposals, and also strategically through published guidance for future proposals. In all these planning processes, the memorial landscape is understood as having considerable potential for reflecting the community’s changing historical consciousness and values. This nexus between form and values is complex. The aim of this paper is to analyse and test this nexus: to examine what kinds of commemorative forms and topics do and do not find adequate expression in Canberra’s landscape, and why; and to better understand the difficulties and possibilities of guiding and coordinating the various commemorative proposals which are put forward by various parties. After outlining the issues to be explored and the types of data that can shed light on them, the paper provides a brief history of the major memorials erected in Canberra up until 2002, and the rationales that shaped them.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Peter Dalton (PDF 44KB)
    Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories Inquiry into the Immigration Bridge Australia Proposal Submission by Peter J Dalton – Canberra resident since 1976. I wish to register my firm opposition to the construction of the pedestrian footbridge proposed by Immigration Bridge Australia. My opinions are drawn from attendance at several meetings with officers of the NCA, meetings with Andrew Baulch of IBA and some of his committee members, the content of the IBA website, discussions with the committee of the Canberra Yacht Club and with members of a sub committee established by the NCA for the purposes of community consultation called the Lake Users Group. In Summary: 1 I believe the process adopted by Immigration Bridge Australia is flawed, inappropriate and is seriously lacking in proper public consultation by IBA and by the NCA. Claims that it was drawn in the original plans of Walter Burley Griffin are misleading and the particular footbridge is not in the interests of the people of Canberra, let alone in the interests of the lake users. It will ruin the foreshore and is in conflict with several other existing objectives of the NCA. 2 The process adopted by IBA to raise funds is open to question on matters of honesty as it contains extravagant claims, some of which are unsubstantiated. The IBA advertisements and web site information imply that the plans for the bridge have been fully designed, approved and that they will proceed once members of the public pay for plaques. This method of publicity serves to place the Commonwealth in an invidious position whereupon it could be subject to pressure to agree with the construction without due planning process, without suitable public approval and without a study to determine actual need.
    [Show full text]