DOCSLIB.ORG

Alaska Boundary Question

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alaska Boundary Question STATEMENT OF FACTS — REGARDING THE- ALASKA BOUNDARY QUESTION, -COMPILED FOR THE- GOVERNMENT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ALEXANDER BEGG. THE GOVERNMENTOF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUUW* VICTORIA, B.C. Printed by RICHARD WOLFENDEN, Printer to the King's Most Excellent Majesty. 1902, to Ssj ci a> CO l|D-|8 an a.) g> v PO JS .E |g.s"| s tu «.§4§ng 0 •0 «£ a.S S c —~5 !* •JCDD w SS^-a-3 > C 53 «8-g ft § 3 5 * .9 _'~l « o f> (« O 5 OH £.5 £ = ill.s 0 O c c4Coq CO S'cgjl^? ccgS^SS i PcSsMS 2 o or a soic c^ o 3 arS-S-ti-0 C.« OiC gT3 Z ^>&W Br- oi-n c 3 ^ .-§ a •- 53 "g *. p » £ <! o * -o » cc *j ^ : rft c 3 -= - % £ <! HJ •« it— E * rH < m - 2 VJZ ~ Z tc w h (/I « © -o ° * & w oS B ffi v: S^ SB'S « S£ H C -CCC $3 +o w " „ g> o!» oS -a () cc ^ .£ ? ^ .£ 0) cc - c _ oCC CO. 0 oo -" — 9 7c no PH t£ 3 sCoD top q.CC J ^t„ -C3 < esc S" >, csFSoJg £ 3 _»§ a* 1 § £ to d c in §s§-3-g§ 00 °~ 40 00 g CO j S SiJ §3 -S^oe-o v 5ww^ ^ 2 ED. 7 ALASKA BOUNDARY QUESTION. 1381 REPORT -ON THE- ALASKA BOUNDARY QUESTION. VICTORIA, B. C, 5th August, 1901. To the Hon. David MacEwen Eberts, Attorney-General for British Columbia, etc., etc., etc. SIR,—In compliance with your request that I should arrange in a convenient form for reference my investigations and conclusions relative to the Anglo-Russian Treaty of 1825, with a view to the settlement of the Alaskan Boundary, the following remarks are respectfully submitted :— The greatest care and candour shall be exercised on my part in dealing with this inter­ national question, the magnitude and the importance of which are not easily realised. In by-gone days, when the Treaty referred to was framed and passed, that portion of the American Continent, being little known, was not deemed of much value, except for fur-hunting purposes. Lapse of time, however, has produced many changes, which require to be dealt with on their merits. Statements which may be brought forward in connection with this question, or which may have been adduced previously, to be of value, should be susceptible of proof, and be founded, not on assumption, but on tangible, solid foundation. The aim of this report is to present the " Boundary Question " as free from doubt and ambiguity as possible, referring to both sides without bias or prejudice, keeping the Treaty continually in view as a guide. The whole matter naturally resolves itself into two heads, which require to be fully investigated and examined and decided upon, namely : the contention of British Columbia, or Canada, or Great Britain, under the Treaty, on the one side, and the claims of the United States, with their purchase of the rights of Russia to Alaska in 1867, on the other. It may be best to premise here that, in a former " review " of this boundary question, I have demonstrated that the passing of the Anglo-Russian Treaty was, chiefly, to protect Great Britain in her maritime rights against the extravagant claims made by Russia in 1821. In reference to this, the Right Hon. George Canning said (December 8th, 1824):— * * * " The whole negotiation grows out of the Ukase of 1821. ******* So entirely and absolutely true is this proposition that the settlement of the limits of the respective possessions of Great Britain and Russia on the North-West Coast of America was proposed by us only as a mode of facilitating the adjustment of the differences arising from the Ukase, by enabling the Court of Russia to withdraw, with less appearance of concession, the offensive pretensions of that edict." The first point to be considered is the initial point of the line of demarcation, which is described in the Treaty as " commencing from the southernmost point of the island called Prince of Wales Island " (which is conceded to be Cape Chacon), " which point lies in parallel of 54 degrees, 40 minutes, north latitude, and between the 131st and 133rd degrees of west longitude (meridian of Greenwich), the said line shall ascend to the north, along the channel called Portland Channel, as far as the point of the continent where it strikes the 56th degree of north latitude; from this last mentioned point the line of demarcation shall follow the summit of the mountains situated parallel to the coast, as far as the point of intersection of the 141st degree of west longitude (of the same meridian); and, finally, from the said point of intersection, the said meridian line of the 141st degree, in its prolongation as far as the frozen ocean, shall form the limit between the Russian and British possessions on the continent of America to the north-west." 1382 ALASKA BOUNDARY QUESTION. 1902 Article IV.—With reference to the line of demarcation laid down in the preceding article, it is understood : " First. That the island called Prince of Wales Island shall belong wholly to Russia. Second. That wherever the summit of the mountains which extend in a direction parallel to the coast, from the 56th degree of north latitude to the point of intersection of the 141st degree of west longitude, shall prove to be at the distance of more than ten marine leagues from the ocean, the limit between the British possessions and the line of coast which is to belong to Russia shall be formed by a line parallel to the windings of the coast, and which shall never exceed the distance of ten marine leagues therefrom." It having been conceded that the initial point of the line of demarcation, as declared in the Treaty, is Cape Chacon, it is now in order to examine the route or routes chosen, or which have been adopted as the boundary line by parties interested. Those lines are numbered on the accompanying explanatory map by the figures 1, 2, 3, 4, and will be examined seriatim. (See map.) Boundary line marked ISTo. 1 is drawn in accordance with the wording of the Treaty —i. e., "ascending to the north along the channel called Portland Channel, as far as the point of the continent where it strikes the 56th degree of north latitude." As the maps published in 1824 did not give the name of the Channel, but described it, so as to leave no doubt that it was Duke of Clarence Strait, it is necessary, by way of explanation or interpretation, to refer to the despatches on this subject which passed between Sir Charles Bagot, the British Plenipotentiary at St. Petersburg, and the Right Hon. George Canning, then British Foreign Secretary, who had the matter in hand. On July 12th, 1824, Mr. Canning sent Sir Charles a despatch, of which the following is an abstract:—" After full consideration of the motives which are alleged by the Russian Government for adhering to their last propositions respecting the line of demarcation to be drawn between the British and Russian occupancy on the north-west coast of America, and of the comparative inconvenience of admitting some relaxation in the terms of your Excellency's last instructions, or of leaving the question between the two Governments unsettled for an indefinite time, His Majesty's Government has resolved to authorise your Excellency to include the south points of Prince of Wales Island, within the Russian frontier, and to take as a line of demarcation a line drawn from the southernmost point of Prince of Wales Island, from south to north, through Portland Channel, till it strikes the mainland in latitude 56 degrees." * * * * u ?pjje advantages conceded to Russia by the line of demarcation are so obvious as to render it quite impossible that any objection can reasonably be offered on the part of the Russian Government to any of the stipulations in our favour. There are two points which are left to be settled by your Excellency. First, in fixing the course of the eastern boundary of the strip of land to be occupied by Russia on the coast." ******* The foregoing extract seemed to have been based on " Statement D," enclosed by Sir Charles to Mr. Canning in a despatch dated March 17/29th, 1824, and which had previously been communicated by Sir Charles to the Russian plenipotentiaries. It says :—" It was in the hope of being able to conciliate those objects, considered indispensable by the Imperial Government," said Sir Charles, " and to determine without more delay a question which appeared of equal interest to both parties, to arrange definitely, at the actual time, when the plenipotentiary of His Britannic Majesty had the honour to propose, on his last conference with the plenipotentiaries of Russia, a line of demarcation which, while conserving to Russia for a southern limit on the islands, the degree of latitude suggested by the Ukase of 1799, would assign at the same time to Great Britain, for a limit on the mainland, the latitude of 56° 30' north." " It would appear," Statement D continues, " that a line traced from the southern extremity of the straits named Duke of Clarence Sound, by the middle of those straits, to the middle of the straits that separate the islands of the Prince of Wales and the Duke of York, and the islands situate to the north of the said islands; thence towards the east by the middle of the same strait to the continent, and thence prolonged in the same direction and manner already proposed by His Britannic Majesty's plenipotentiary to Mount Elias, or to the inter­ section of the 141st degree of longitude, would form a line of demarcation which would conciliate, perhaps, in a satisfactory manner, the reciprocal interests, present and future, of both Empires in this part of the globe." In " Statement D," it is also said, referring to the Hudson Bay Company's occupation :— " His Britannic Majesty could not, therefore, without sacrificing the interests of the Company, renounce the rights of sovereignty over the coast and the islands lhat immediately adjoin it, 2 ED.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE WHIG INTERPRETATION of the HISTORY of RED RIVER By
    THE WHIG INTERPRETATION OF THE HISTORY OF RED RIVER By BRIAN MARTIN GALLAGHER B.A., The University of British Columbia, 1980 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of History) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, 1986 ® Brian Martin Gallagher, 1986 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date /0 Ot^^Ly E-6 (3/81) ii ABSTRACT The whig interpretation, which can be most simply defined as the idea that past events led in direct and progressive stages to the present, has long been recognized as a basic historiographic fallacy. The fullest expression of the whig interpretation of western Canadian history is to be found in the works of George F.G. Stanley and W.L. Morton. In presenting a narrative reconstruction of the events surrounding Canada's annexation of Red River, these authors primarily attempt to justify Canadian policy as the extension of British civilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Reorganization: Proposed Calendar Description for Both Courses
    Proposed reorganization: We would like to replace CSC 220 described above, with the two courses listed below: 1. CSC 115: Discrete Computational Mathematicsl 2. CSC 215: Discrete Computational Mathematics II Proposed calendar description for both courses: CSC 115 Discrete Computational Mathematics I This course introduces the student to the mathematical models and formalisms that are of genuine use in Computer Science and Mathematics. The topics covered include set theory, principles of counting, logic, mathematical induction, relations and functions, ?nite—state machines, and the principle of inclusion and exclusion. Prerequisite: Math 12 or Math 050 or Math 100 3 CR / (3, 0) CSC 215 Discrete Computational Mathematics II This course is a continuation of CSC 115. Topics covered include generating functions, recurrence relations, graph theory, trees, optimization and matching, rings and modular arithmetic, Boolean algebra and switching functions, coding theory, ?nite ?elds, and combinatorial designs. Prerequisite.‘ CSC 115 and Math 101 3CR/(3,0) Proposed calendar changes to the Career Path Index: The current career path index for computer science is the 2D package. After consulting with the Counselling and Academic Advising Department, it was determined that, the best package for computer science majors will be 2C if a minor change is made to the 2C package. The Computer Science Department does endorse the change recommended. Below is the current listing of the 2C package in the calendar: Package Semester I Semester II Notes CHEM 113 CHEM 114 1. Prerequisites: ENGL 101 or 103 ENGL 102 or 104 M311112 or MATH 100 2C MATH 101 MATH 102 01- MATH 050, CSC 109 CSC 110 Chemistry 11 or PHYS 105 PHYS 106 CHEM 045) Physics 11 or PHYS 045.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alaska Boundary Dispute
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical and Legal Study of Sovereignty in the Canadian North : Terrestrial Sovereignty, 1870–1939
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2014 A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939 Smith, Gordon W. University of Calgary Press "A historical and legal study of sovereignty in the Canadian north : terrestrial sovereignty, 1870–1939", Gordon W. Smith; edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta, 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50251 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca A HISTORICAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF SOVEREIGNTY IN THE CANADIAN NORTH: TERRESTRIAL SOVEREIGNTY, 1870–1939 By Gordon W. Smith, Edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer ISBN 978-1-55238-774-0 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at ucpress@ ucalgary.ca Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specificwork without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Hyder and Vicinity Southeastern Alaska
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Roy O. West, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otis Smith, Director Bulletin 807 GEOLOGY OF HYDER AND VICINITY SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA WITH A RECONNAISSANCE OF CHICKAMIN RIVER BY A. F. RUDDINGTON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1&29 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS TJ.S.OOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 35 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS Page Foreword, by Philip S. Smith._________________________ vn Introduction...____________________________________________________ 1 Field work_.._.___._.______..____...____. -_-__-. .. 1 Acknowledgments. _-_-________-_-___-___-__--_____-__-- -____-_ 2 History._________________________________________________________ 2 Bibliography ________-______ _____________._-__.-___-__--__--_--_-_ 3 Alaska.__-___-__---______-_-____-_-___--____-___-_-___-__-___ & British Columbia____-_____-___-___________-_-___--___.._____- 4 Geography_______________________________________-____--___-__--_ 4 Location and transportation facilities.___________________________ 4 Climate. __--______-______.____--__---____-_______--._--.--__- 5 Vegetation ___________________________________________________ 6 Water power._--___._____.________.______-_.._____-___.-_____ 7 Topography-___________--____-_-___--____.___-___-----__--_-- 7 General features of the relief----______-_---___-__------_-_-_ 7 Streams.._ _______________________________________________ 9 Glaciation.. _ __-_____-__--__--_____-__---_____-__--_----__ 10 Geology.... __----_-._ -._---_--__-.- _-_____-_____-___-_ 13 General features___-_-____-__-__-___-..____--___-_-____--__-._ 13 Hazelton group._....._.._>___-_-.__-______----_-----'_-__-..-- 17 General character.-----.-------.-------------------------- 17 Greenstone and associated rocks.._______.__.-.--__--_--_--_ 18 Graywacke-slate division.._________-_-__--_-_-----_--_----_ 19 Coast.Range intrusives__________-__-__--___-----------_-----_- 22 Texas Creek batholith and associated dikes..__--__.__-__-__-.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Summary Report for Chum Salmon Escapement Surveys in the Nass Area in 2015
    Data Summary Report for Chum Salmon Escapement Surveys in the Nass Area in 2015 Prepared by: LGL Limited environmental research associates 9768 Second Street Sidney, BC V8L 3Y8 Prepared for: Pacific Salmon Commission 600 - 1155 Robson Street Vancouver, BC V6E 1B5 and Nisga’a Lisims Government Fisheries & Wildlife Department P.O. Box 228 Gitlaxt’aamiks, BC V0J 1A0 Nisga’a Fisheries Report #15-26 31 December 2016 Data Summary Report for Chum Salmon Escapement Surveys in the Nass Area in 2015 Prepared by: LGL Limited environmental research associates 9768 Second Street Sidney, BC V8L 3Y8 Prepared for: Pacific Salmon Commission 600 - 1155 Robson Street Vancouver, BC V6E 1B5 and Nisga’a Lisims Government Fisheries & Wildlife Department P.O. Box 228 Gitlaxt’aamiks, BC V0J 1A0 Nisga’a Fisheries Report #15-26 31 December 2016 EA3624 DATA SUMMARY REPORT FOR CHUM SALMON ESCAPEMENT SURVEYS IN THE NASS AREA IN 2015 Prepared by: I. A. Beveridge, R. F. Alexander, S. C. Kingshott, C. A. J. Noble, and C. Braam LGL Limited environmental research associates 9768 Second Street Sidney, BC V8L 3Y8 Prepared for: Pacific Salmon Commission #600 - 1155 Robson Street Vancouver, BC V6E 1B5 and Nisga’a Lisims Government Fisheries & Wildlife Department P.O. Box 228 Gitlaxt’aamiks, BC V0J 1A0 Nisga’a Fisheries Report #15-26 31 December 2016 i TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................ii LIST OF FIGURES ...............................................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • Lt. Aemilius Simpson's Survey from York Factory to Fort Vancouver, 1826
    The Journal of the Hakluyt Society August 2014 Lt. Aemilius Simpson’s Survey from York Factory to Fort Vancouver, 1826 Edited by William Barr1 and Larry Green CONTENTS PREFACE The journal 2 Editorial practices 3 INTRODUCTION The man, the project, its background and its implementation 4 JOURNAL OF A VOYAGE ACROSS THE CONTINENT OF NORTH AMERICA IN 1826 York Factory to Norway House 11 Norway House to Carlton House 19 Carlton House to Fort Edmonton 27 Fort Edmonton to Boat Encampment, Columbia River 42 Boat Encampment to Fort Vancouver 62 AFTERWORD Aemilius Simpson and the Northwest coast 1826–1831 81 APPENDIX I Biographical sketches 90 APPENDIX II Table of distances in statute miles from York Factory 100 BIBLIOGRAPHY 101 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Fig. 1. George Simpson, 1857 3 Fig. 2. York Factory 1853 4 Fig. 3. Artist’s impression of George Simpson, approaching a post in his personal North canoe 5 Fig. 4. Fort Vancouver ca.1854 78 LIST OF MAPS Map 1. York Factory to the Forks of the Saskatchewan River 7 Map 2. Carlton House to Boat Encampment 27 Map 3. Jasper to Fort Vancouver 65 1 Senior Research Associate, Arctic Institute of North America, University of Calgary, Calgary AB T2N 1N4 Canada. 2 PREFACE The Journal The journal presented here2 is transcribed from the original manuscript written in Aemilius Simpson’s hand. It is fifty folios in length in a bound volume of ninety folios, the final forty folios being blank. Each page measures 12.8 inches by seven inches and is lined with thirty- five faint, horizontal blue-grey lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline: Cheslatta Carrier Nation and “Southside” Community 5000BC
    Timeline: Cheslatta Carrier Nation and “Southside” Community (Updated to March 3 2021 by Mike Robertson) Please contact me for additions and/or corrections [email protected] 5000BC Archaeological evidence confirms 7000 years of human occupation in the Cheslatta Territory 1763 British Royal Proclamation reserved undefined North American land for Aboriginal people. 1770 est “Grandmother Cheslatta” born 1774 Juan Perez Hernandez claimed the Northwestern coast of North America for Spain. 1791 Spanish explorer Esteban Jose Martinez traded copper sheets to Nootka Sound Chief Maquinna for sawn timber. 1793 Alexander Mackenzie became the first white man to travel through Carrier and Sekani territories while looking for fur-trading areas for the North West Company. 1805-1807 - Simon Fraser established four trading posts in Carrier and Sekani territories: Fort McLeod, Fort George, Fort St. James and Fort Fraser. Until the Hudson Bay Company and North West Company joined together in 1821, Fort St. James was the centre of government and commerce in British Columbia (then called New Caledonia). It claims to be the oldest established white settlement on the B.C. Mainland 1807 February 10th Simon Fraser wrote a letter to express what he witnessed in Stella (Stellaquo). “Almost all Natlians are gone over to Steela.. to grand feast to burn and exhume a couple of chiefs that died of late. When they return from there they will go to the mountains to kill Caribou.” 1828 Chief Kwah captured James Douglas at Ft. St. James, whom he held until his release was negotiated. The incident lead to conflict among different Carrier Nations. Douglas went on to become the first governor of the united colony of British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • MS Watersheds 12 Digit Shapefile
    MS Watersheds 12 Digit Shapefile Tags 16-digit, Hydrologic Unit Code, Region, US, 4-digit, HUC, United States, Watershed Boundary Dataset, 2-digit, Basin, 10-digit, Hydrologic Units, Sub-basin, Watershed, WBD, 6-digit, inlandWaters, Sub-region, Subwatershed, 12-digit, 14-digit, 8-digit Summary The intent of defining Hydrologic Units (HU) within the Watershed Boundary Dataset is to establish a base-line drainage boundary framework, accounting for all land and surface areas. Hydrologic units are intended to be used as a tool for water-resource management and planning activities particularly for site-specific and localized studies requiring a level of detail provided by large-scale map information. The WBD complements the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) and supports numerous programmatic missions and activities including: watershed management, rehabilitation and enhancement, aquatic species conservation strategies, flood plain management and flood prevention, water-quality initiatives and programs, dam safety programs, fire assessment and management, resource inventory and assessment, water data analysis and water census. **** NOTE - MARIS Staff created a Mississippi collection from various regions in January 2019 **** Description The Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) is a comprehensive aggregated collection of hydrologic unit data consistent with the national criteria for delineation and resolution. It defines the areal extent of surface water drainage to a point except in coastal or lake front areas where there could be multiple outlets as stated by the "Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD)" “Standard” (http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/). Watershed boundaries are determined solely upon science-based hydrologic principles, not favoring any administrative boundaries or special projects, nor particular program or agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Prioritization of Prince of Wales Island
    CONSERVATION PRIORITIZATION OF PRINCE OF WALES ISLAND Identifying opportunities for private land conservation Prepared by the Southeast Alaska Land Trust With support from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Alaska Coastal Conservation Program February 2013 Conservation prioritization of Prince of Wales Island Conservation prioritization of Prince of Wales Island IDENTIFYING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION INTRODUCTION The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) awarded the Southeast Alaska Land Trust (SEAL Trust) a Coastal Grant in 2012. SEAL Trust requested this grant to fund a conservation priority analysis of private property on Prince of Wales Island. This report and an associated Geographic Information Systems (GIS) map are the products of that work. Driving SEAL Trust’s interest in conservation opportunities on Prince of Wales Island is its obligations as an in-lieu fee sponsor for Southeast Alaska, which makes it eligible to receive fees in-lieu of mitigation for wetland impacts. Under its instrument with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers1, SEAL Trust must give priority to project sites within the same 8-digit Hydrologic Unit (HUC) as the permitted impacts. In the past 10 years, SEAL Trust has received a number of in-lieu fees from wetlands impacted by development on Prince of Wales Island, which, along with its outer islands, is the 8-digit HUC #19010103 (see Map 1). SEAL Trust has no conservation holdings or potential projects on Prince of Wales Island. In an attempt to achieve its conservation goals and compliance with the geographic elements of the Instrument, SEAL Trust wanted to take a strategic approach to exploring preservation possibilities in the Prince of Wales HUC.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellow-Cedar Decline in the North Coast Forest District of British Columbia
    United States Department of Agriculture Yellow-Cedar Decline in the Forest Service North Coast Forest District Pacific Northwest Research Station of British Columbia Research Note PNW-RN-549 Paul E. Hennon, David V. D’Amore, Stefan Zeglen, and October 2005 Mike Grainger1 Abstract The distribution of a forest decline of yellow-cedar (Callitropsis nootkatensis (D. Don) Örsted) has been documented in southeast Alaska, but its occurrence in British Columbia was previously unknown. We conducted an aerial survey in the Prince Rupert area in September 2004 to determine if yellow-cedar forests in the North Coast Forest District of British Columbia were experiencing a similar fate as in nearby Alaska. Numerous large areas of concentrated yellow-cedar mortality were found, extending the known distribution of the decline problem 150 km south of the Alaska–British Columbia border. The forests with the most concentrated tree death occurred at 300 to 400 m elevation, frequently on south aspects. The appearance of these forests including proximity to bogs; mixtures of dying, recently killed, and long-dead trees; and crown and bole symptoms of dying trees were all consistent with the phenomenon in southeast Alaska. Introduction 2 Yellow-cedar (Callitropsis nootkatensis (D. Don) Örsted) decline (fig. 1) extends over 200 000 ha in a broad band through southeast Alaska to the Alaska–British Columbia border along Portland Canal (fig. 2) (Wittwer 2004). The problem is specific to yellow-cedar and is characterized on the landscape as a progressive and intensifying process that results in fading trees with thin or offcolor crowns and numerous standing dead trees, some killed recently and others up to 100 1 Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Does Canada Have So Many Unresolved Maritime Boundary Disputes? –– Pourquoi Le Canada A-T-Il Autant De Différends Non Résolus Concernant Ses Frontières Maritimes?
    Why Does Canada Have So Many Unresolved Maritime Boundary Disputes? –– Pourquoi le Canada a-t-il autant de différends non résolus concernant ses frontières maritimes? michael byers and andreas Østhagen Abstract Résumé Canada has five unresolved maritime Le Canada a cinq frontières maritimes qui boundaries. This might seem like a high n’ont pas encore été délimitées. Ce nom- number, given that Canada has only three bre peut paraitre élevé étant donné que le neighbours: the United States, Denmark Canada n’a que trois voisins: les États-Unis, (Greenland), and France (St. Pierre and le Danemark (Groënland) et la France (St. Miquelon). This article explores why Pierre et Miquelon). Cet article cherche à Canada has so many unresolved maritime découvrir pourquoi le Canada a tant de boundaries. It does so through a compar- frontières maritimes irrésolues. Pour ce ison with Norway, which has settled all of faire, l’article se penche sur le cas de la its maritime boundaries, most notably in Norvège, qui a réussi à délimiter toutes ses the Barents Sea with Russia. This compar- frontières maritimes, y compris dans la mer ison illuminates some of the factors that de Barents avec la Russie. Cette comparai- motivate or impede maritime boundary son met en relief certains des facteurs qui negotiations. It turns out that the status favorisent ou entravent les négociations of each maritime boundary can only be pour la résolution de différends maritimes explained on the basis of its own unique frontaliers. Il s’avère que le statut des fron- geographic, historic, political, and legal tières maritimes ne peut s’expliquer qu’en context.
    [Show full text]