CASE of DI SARNO and OTHERS V. ITALY.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CASE of DI SARNO and OTHERS V. ITALY.Pdf SECOND SECTION CASE OF DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. ITALY (Application no. 30765/08) JUDGMENT [Extracts] STRASBOURG 10 January 2012 FINAL 10/04/2012 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. 2 DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. ITALY JUDGMENT In the case of di Sarno and Others v. Italy, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Françoise Tulkens, President, Danutė Jočienė, Dragoljub Popović, Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, András Sajó, Işıl Karakaş, Guido Raimondi, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 29 November 2011, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 30765/08) against the Italian Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by eighteen Italian nationals on 9 January 2008. 2. The applicants, a list of whose names is appended to the present judgment, were represented before the Court by one of their number, Mr Errico di Lorenzo, a lawyer practising in Somma Vesuviana (Naples). 3. The Italian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms E. Spatafora, and their former co-Agent, Mr N. Lettieri. 4. The applicants alleged that the poor management by the Italian authorities of the waste collection, treatment and disposal services in the Campania region of Italy, and the lack of diligence of the judicial authorities in prosecuting those responsible, had violated their rights under Articles 2, 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention. 5. On 2 June 2009 the Court decided to give notice of the application to the Government and give it priority treatment (Rule 41 of the Rules of Court). It also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (former Article 29 § 3). DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. ITALY JUDGMENT 3 THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6. Thirteen of the applicants live in the municipality of Somma Vesuviana, in Campania (Italy). The other five work there. 7. From 11 February 1994 to 31 December 2009 a state of emergency (stato di emergenza) was in place in the Campania region, by decision of the then Prime Minister, because of serious problems of solid urban waste disposal. 8. From 11 February 1994 to 23 May 2008 the management of the state of emergency was entrusted to “deputy commissioners” appointed by the Prime Minister and assisted by assistant commissioners. Nine high officials – including four presidents of the region of Campania and the head of the civil emergency planning department of the Prime Minister’s Office – were appointed deputy commissioners. 9. From 23 May 2008 to 31 December 2009 the management of the state of emergency was entrusted to an under-secretariat in the Prime Minister’s Office under the head of the civil emergency planning department. A. Waste management in Campania and in the municipality of Somma Vesuviana until 2004 10. Regional Law no. 10 of 10 February 1993 (“Law no. 10/93”) laid down guidelines for the adoption of a waste disposal plan in Campania which was to treat urban solid waste and recyclable materials and halve the number and capacity of landfill sites – with the help of compacting and sorting techniques – between 1993 and 1995. 11. On 9 June 1997 the President of the Region, having been appointed deputy commissioner, drew up a regional waste disposal plan. Among other things, it provided for the construction of five incinerators – four of which would be built on land in the municipalities of Marcianise, Battipaglia, Giugliano and Nola-Marigliano (the last two of these were to serve the municipalities where the applicants lived), and the fifth on a site to be determined at a later date – and also five main landfill sites and six secondary sites. 12. On 12 June 1998 the President of the Region, acting as deputy commissioner, issued a call for tenders for a ten-year concession to operate the waste collection and disposal service in the province of Naples. According to the specifications, the successful bidder would be required to ensure the proper reception of the collected waste, its sorting, conversion into refuse-derived fuel (combustibile derivato da rifiuti – “RDF”) and incineration. To that end, it was to construct and manage three waste sorting 4 DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. ITALY JUDGMENT and RDF production facilities and set up an electric power plant fuelled by RDF, by 31 December 2000. 13. When the tendering process ended on 20 March 2000, the concession was awarded to a consortium of five companies: Fisia Impianti S.p.A. (main contractor), Impregilo S.p.A., Babcock Kommunal GmbH, Deutsche Babcock Anlagen GmbH and Evo Oberhausen AG (subcontractors). 14. Under the terms of a service concession agreement signed on 7 June 2000, the five successful companies undertook to build two RDF production centres in Caivano and Tufino in 300 days, starting on 10 and 14 April 2000 respectively, and another in Giugliano in 270 days, starting from 30 March 2000. The RDF-fuelled power plant to be built in Acerra was to be built in 24 months, starting from a date to be determined later. 15. In the meantime, on 22 April 1999 the deputy commissioner had issued a call for tenders for the waste disposal service concession in Campania. The concession was awarded to FIBE S.p.A. a consortium of companies formed specially for the purpose. On an unspecified date they formed a company called FIBE Campania S.p.A. 16. Under the concession agreement signed on 5 September 2001, FIBE S.p.A. was to build and manage seven RDF production centres and two electric power plants fuelled by RDF. It was also required to ensure the proper reception, sorting and treatment of the waste collected in the region and transform 32% of it into RDF and 33% into compost, and produce 14% of non-recyclable waste and 3% of ferrous waste. 17. In January 2001 the closure of the Tufino landfill site resulted in the temporary suspension of waste disposal services in the province of Naples. To help control the situation the mayors of the other municipalities in the province authorised the storage of the waste in their respective landfill sites on a temporary basis, under section 13 of Legislative Decree no. 22 of 5 February 1997 ... 18. From the end of 2001 to May 2003 seven RDF production centres were built, in Caivano, Pianodardine, Santa Maria Capua Vetere, Giugliano, Casalduni, Tufino and Battipaglia. 19. On 22 May 2001 the urban waste collection and transport service of the municipality of Somma Vesuviana was entrusted to a consortium of two companies: C.I.C.-Clin Industrie Città S.p.A. and Ecologia Bruscino S.r.l. On 26 October 2004 the management of the service was handed over to M.I.T.A. S.p.A., a publicly-owned company. DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. ITALY JUDGMENT 5 B. The criminal investigation into the situation of the waste disposal service following the signature of the concession contracts of 7 June 2000 and 5 September 2001 20. In 2003 the Naples Public Prosecutor’s Office opened a criminal investigation (RGNR no. 15940/03) into the management of the waste disposal service in Campania since the signature of the concession contracts on 7 June 2000 and 5 September 2001. 21. On 31 July 2007 the public prosecutor’s office requested the committal for trial of the administrators and certain employees of Fisia Italimpianti S.p.A., FIBE S.p.A., FIBE Campania S.p.A., Impregilo S.p.A. and Gestione Napoli S.p.A. (“the companies”), as well as the deputy commissioner in post from 2000 to 2004 and several officials from his office, on charges of fraud, failure to perform public contracts, deception, interruption of a public service or utility, abuse of office, misrepresentation of the facts in the performance of public duties and conducting unauthorised waste management operations, committed between 2001 and 2005. 22. The members of the companies concerned were accused, inter alia, of having, with the complicity of the deputy commissioner and of officials from his office, failed in their contractual duty to receive and process the region’s waste. The companies themselves were accused of having delayed and in some cases interrupted the regular reception of the waste collected in the RDF production centres, causing refuse to pile up in the streets and the temporary storage sites provided by the mayors or the deputy commissioner. 23. The public prosecutor’s office also accused the companies of having (1) produced RDF and compost by means not provided for in their contracts; (2) failed to carry out the requisite RDF energy recovery operations pending the construction of the RDF power station; (3) sub-contracted the transportation of the processed waste produced by the RDF production centres, in breach of the terms of the concession contract; and (4) stocked pollutants from the production of RDF on illegal sites with no effort to protect the environment. 24. The public officials concerned by the committal request were accused of having falsely attested that the companies in question had complied with the laws and contractual provisions governing waste disposal, authorised the opening of non-regulation waste disposal sites, the temporary storage of the RDF pending the opening of the power stations, and the dumping of pollutants produced by RDF production plants, and authorised derogations from the contractual specifications governing RDF production. 25. On 29 February 2008 the preliminary investigation judge ordered the accused to be committed for trial and scheduled the hearing before the Naples Court to be held on 14 May 2008.
Recommended publications
  • Progetto "UN TUTOR PER AMICO"
    ITALIA SCHEDA ELEMENTI ESSENZIALI DEL PROGETTO ASSOCIATO AL PROGRAMMA TITOLO DEL PROGETTO: UN TUTOR PER AMICO SETTORE e AREA DI INTERVENTO: “Educazione e Promozione culturale, paesaggistica, ambientale, del turismo sostenibile e sociale e dello sport” - “07: Attività di tutoraggio scolastico DURATA DEL PROGETTO: 12 MESI OBIETTIVI DEL PROGETTO Il progetto ha come principale obiettivo quello di ridurre e prevenire il fenomeno della dispersione e dell’abbandono scolastico precoce, erogando servizi di tutoraggio scolastico ATTIVITA’ D’IMPIEGO DEGLI OPERATORI VOLONTARI Il progetto prevede azioni che consistono in un supporto del volontario alle attività rivolte ai singoli utenti o ai gruppi, condotte dalle diverse figure professionali, alle quali è affidata la gestione degli interventi e la relativa responsabilità di tutte le azioni. Nello specifico, le loro attività saranno: • Sostegno e recupero di discipline scolastiche; • Partecipazione agli incontri con il corpo docente • Partecipazione agli interventi di sostegno psicologico, finalizzati a sostenere i nuovi impegni scolastici. • Partecipazione alla realizzazione dei laboratori didattici, volti a stimolare e potenziare le capacità dell’alunno, oltrechè sviluppare hobby e passioni (laboratorio multimediale, di lingua inglese, di attività espressive, ecc.); • Ausilio nell’organizzazione e realizzazione di incontri con le strutture sociali e territoriali (Parrocchia, agenzie ricreative, sportive, educative, volontariato, ecc.) • Ausilio nell’organizzazione e realizzazione di incontri con i gruppi giovanili locali. • Accompagnamento degli studenti alle gite, visite a musei, picnic, escursioni, cineforum, parchi- acquatici, ecc. • Ausilio nell’organizzazione e realizzazione di manifestazioni ricreative e spettacoli. • Ausilio nell’organizzazione e realizzazione di campus estivi. • Partecipazione agli incontri di mediazione familiare • Ausilio nell’attivazione di nuove collaborazioni con le agenzie socio-educative locali.
    [Show full text]
  • AMBITO TERRITORIALE N 16 Comuni Di Calvizzano, Melito, Mugnano Di Napoli, Qualiano, Villaricca ASL NA 2 Nord Comune Capofila: Melito Di Napoli Legge 328/00
    AMBITO TERRITORIALE N 16 Comuni di Calvizzano, Melito, Mugnano di Napoli, Qualiano, Villaricca ASL NA 2 Nord Comune capofila: Melito di Napoli Legge 328/00 Regolamento d’Ambito per il rilascio di autorizzazione al funzionamento e accreditamento delle strutture e dei soggetti che provvedono alla gestione e all’offerta del sistema integrato degli interventi e dei servizi sociali Premessa Il presente regolamento va a definire le modalità di concessione degli istituti dell’autorizzazione e dell’accreditamento delle strutture residenziali e semiresidenziali e dei soggetti che provvedono alla gestione e all’offerta del sistema integrato di interventi e servizi sociali, assumendo come principi generali quelli di cui: - alla Legge 8 novembre 2000 n. 328, “Legge quadro per la realizzazione di un sistema integrato di interventi e servizi sociali”; - al “Regolamento Regionale n. 6/2006 concernente i servizi residenziali e semiresidenziali per anziani,diversamente abili e minori”, pubblicato sul BURC n. 1 del 02/01/2007. - alla L.R. 11/2007 “Legge per la dignità e la cittadinanza sociale”. Attuazione della legge 8 novembre 2000, n.328, pubblicata sul BURC n° 57 del 31 ottobre 2007; - alla Delibera di Giunta Regionale n. 666 del 06/12/2011 “Linee guida dei servizi per la salute dei cittadini adulti sofferenti psichici. Criteri – modalità e tariffe per l’erogazione di prestazioni socio-sanitarie e sociali e sociali a carattere residenziale in favore di cittadini adulti con disagio psichico” pubblicato sul BURC n. 79 del 27/12/2011. - al “Regolamento 7 aprile 2014 ,n. 4 di attuazione della legge regionale 23 ottobre 2007,n.11 (legge per la dignità e la cittadinanza sociale.
    [Show full text]
  • Step Into Strode to Get You Goin G…… .. Naples – Caught in a Volcanic
    Step into Strode Course Title: A Level Geography Welcome to Step into Strode at Strode College. In the table below, you will find questions to consider, tasks to complete and some background research to undertake. This is a 4-week programme that will enable you to engage with your future study programme and teaching team. Please read the instructions below and have a go at the activities, remember you are capable. If you struggle at any point, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) section at the bottom for guidance and help. To Our focus for these sessions is going to be volcanic hazards of the Bay of Naples. get you WEEK 1 Watch Napoli SSC fans recreate an eruption of their local volcano, whose outline is goin the symbol of the city: g…… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o129p8lgj58 .. I will give an introductory talk after which you will be able to complete this quiz: Naples – Caught in a Volcanic Sandwich Somma-Vesuvius and the Campi Flegrei Find the right answer (answers next session): 1. Vesuvius last erupted in 1631, 1944, AD79. 2. The biggest killer eruption was 3780 BP, 1631, 1944. 3. The red zone population is 60,000, 600,000, 6m. 4. The most recent volcanic fatalities were in: Naples, Vesuvius, Campi Flegrei. 5. The prevailing wind is from the west, east, south. 6. Naples Airport is called Capodichino, Galileo, Leonardo da Vinci. 7. The local motorway is called Autostrada del Pizza, Autostrada del Sud, Autostrada del Sole. 8. The most vulnerable town is Sorrento, Sarno, Acerro, Torre del Greco.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Responses to the 1906 Eruption of Vesuvius, Southern Italy
    ÔØ ÅÒÙ×Ö ÔØ Human responses to the 1906 eruption of Vesuvius, southern Italy David Chester, Angus Duncan, Christopher Kilburn, Heather Sangster, Carmen Solana PII: S0377-0273(15)00061-X DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.03.004 Reference: VOLGEO 5503 To appear in: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research Received date: 19 December 2014 Accepted date: 4 March 2015 Please cite this article as: Chester, David, Duncan, Angus, Kilburn, Christopher, Sangster, Heather, Solana, Carmen, Human responses to the 1906 eruption of Vesu- vius, southern Italy, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.03.004 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT March 3 2014 Human responses to the 1906 eruption of Vesuvius, southern Italy David Chestera,b, Angus Duncanb, Christopher Kilburnc, Heather Sangsterb and Carmen Solanad,e a Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Liverpool Hope University, Hope Park Liverpool L16 9JD, UK; bDepartment of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK; cAon Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK; dSchool of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 2UP; eInstituto Volcanológico de Canarias (INVOLCAN), Puerto de la Cruz, Canary Islands, Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem Statement
    Peer review exercise in San Giuseppe Vesuviano (IT) 29th July 2015 Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning and resilience: problem statement Cosimo Chiffi, TRT/CIVITAS WIKI The Volcano: Vesuvio The most famous eruption of AD 79 Recent severe eruptions occurred in 1660, 1682, 1694, 1698, 1707, 1737, 1760, 1767, 1779, 1794, 1822, 1834, 1839, 1850, 1855, 1861, 1868, 1872, 1906, 1926, 1929, and 1944 2 PRE in San Giuseppe Vesuviano (IT) - 29th July 2015 Cities, towns and road links in the Vesuvian Area 3 PRE in San Giuseppe Vesuviano (IT) - 29th July 2015 The Vesuvian Area: a densely populated area 2.140.000 inhabitants in the Greater Neapolitan Area (without city of Naples) 2.670 inh/km2 4 PRE in San Giuseppe Vesuviano (IT) - 29th July 2015 National Emergency Plan for the Vesuvian Area • The Red Zone directly involved in case of eruption and the Yellow Zone under the potential influence of Vesuvio eruption 5 PRE in San Giuseppe Vesuviano (IT) - 29th July 2015 Hydrogeological risk for the Vesuvian Area • Other Risks maps of the Vesuvian Area: 1. Landslide 2. Hydraulic 6 PRE in San Giuseppe Vesuviano (IT) - 29th July 2015 2013 Regional Mobility Plan For this area there are no provisions made to reorganise the mobility 7 PRE in San Giuseppe Vesuviano (IT) - 29th July 2015 Who is working on the idea of resilient SUMP? San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Striano e Terzigno • 53.000 inhabitants •High quality agricolture products •Tertiary industry productions •Vesuvio National Park 2020 Objectives •CO2 emissions reduction beyond 20% (between 26% and 29%) •Increased
    [Show full text]
  • Herculaneum Archaeology
    The Fifth Herculaneum Congress - Robert Fowler Talks at the Villa Maiuri as part of the Fifth Herculaneum Congress - Richard Janko Other News Suburban Baths - tetrastyle atrium - herm of Apollo the newsletter of the Friends of Herculaneum Society - Issue 18 Summer 2014 of the Friends Herculaneum the newsletter herculaneum archaeology herculaneum The Fifth Herculaneum Congress1 Robert Fowler Henry Overton Wills Professor of Greek Bristol University One first-timer commented that you can tell this meeting is a success by the number of return attendees. Several veterans thought the Fifth was the best yet, and so it was said about all the previous ones. We like to think it’s because we are learning to do things better, rather than that an Olympic- style ritual declaration of the ‘best ever Games’ is taking hold. Yet that would be no bad thing, either; the pronouncement, however much expected, always meets with gleeful and often justified assent. Things nearly got off to a very bad start. Something not far short of an official hurricane (‘poco ci mancava’, said my taxi driver, ‘there wasn’t much in it’) struck the Monday before arrival and, though it miraculously harmed no one in Ercolano and damaged no archaeology, it did uproot trees, mangle safety barriers and create other hazards such that the site had been closed all week, only opening again on the morning we intended to visit. The Superintendency, which this year has been particularly disorganised in the matter of issuing permits, had not yet issued ours, and there was much anxiety Thursday night as to what would happen the next day.
    [Show full text]
  • De Gasperi Sede Di Castellammare Di Stabia
    Allegato 8 Competenza territoriale delle Sedi di riferimento SEDE DI NAPOLI (continua Sede di Napoli) 80021 AFRAGOLA 80046 SAN GIORGIO A CREMANO 80071 ANACAPRI 80040 SAN SEBASTIANO AL VESUVIO 80022 ARZANO 80029 SANT'ANTIMO 80070 BACOLI 80070 SERRARA FONTANA 80070 BARANO D'ISCHIA 80023 CAIVANO NAPOLI - DE GASPERI 80073 CAPRI 80012 CALVIZZANO 80024 CARDITO 80014 GIUGLIANO IN CAMPANIA 80074 CASAMICCIOLA TERME 80016 MARANO DI NAPOLI 80025 CASANDRINO 80017 MELITO DI NAPOLI 80020 CASAVATORE 80018 MUGNANO DI NAPOLI 80026 CASORIA 80127 NAPOLI 80020 CRISPANO 80128 NAPOLI 80056 ERCOLANO 80131 NAPOLI 80075 FORIO 80136 NAPOLI 80027 FRATTAMAGGIORE 80144 NAPOLI 80020 FRATTAMINORE 80145 NAPOLI 80028 GRUMO NEVANO 80019 QUALIANO 80077 ISCHIA 80010 VILLARICCA 80076 LACCO AMENO 80070 MONTE DI PROCIDA SEDE DI CASTELLAMMARE DI STABIA 80121 NAPOLI 80122 NAPOLI 80051 AGEROLA 80123 NAPOLI 80041 BOSCOREALE 80124 NAPOLI 80042 BOSCOTRECASE 80125 NAPOLI 80050 CASOLA DI NAPOLI 80126 NAPOLI 80053 CASTELLAMMARE DI STABIA 80129 NAPOLI 80054 GRAGNANO 80132 NAPOLI 80050 LETTERE 80133 NAPOLI 80061 MASSA LUBRENSE 80134 NAPOLI 80062 META 80135 NAPOLI 80063 PIANO DI SORRENTO 80137 NAPOLI 80050 PIMONTE 80138 NAPOLI 80040 POGGIOMARINO 80139 NAPOLI 80045 POMPEI 80141 NAPOLI 80065 SANT'AGNELLO 80142 NAPOLI 80057 SANT'ANTONIO ABATE 80143 NAPOLI 80050 SANTA MARIA LA CARITA' 80146 NAPOLI 80067 SORRENTO 80147 NAPOLI 80040 STRIANO 80044 OTTAVIANO 80058 TORRE ANNUNZIATA 80055 PORTICI 80059 TORRE DEL GRECO 80078 POZZUOLI 80040 TRECASE 80079 PROCIDA 80069 VICO EQUENSE 80010 QUARTO (continua
    [Show full text]
  • Citta' Di SOMMA VESUVIANA Provincia Di NAPOLI Numero Pag
    Citta' di SOMMA VESUVIANA Provincia di NAPOLI Numero Pag. 1 d'ordine GENERALITA' 103 ALLOCCA ANNA MARIA Sez. 23 nata il 14/09/1975 a POMIGLIANO D'ARCO (NA) VIA ALLOCCA N. 18 148 ALLOCCA MARIA Sez. 15 nata il 27/02/1987 a POLLENA TROCCHIA (NA) VIA ALLOCCA N. 49 183 AMATO ANNUNZIATA Sez. 24 nata il 18/03/1969 a PORTICI (NA) VIA MERCATO VECCHIO N. 14 P. 1 205 ANGARELLI LAURA Sez. 29 nata il 01/05/1974 a CERCOLA (NA) VIA MICCO N. 12 303 AURIEMMA GIUSEPPINA Sez. 2 nata il 03/01/1970 a NAPOLI (NA) VIA S.MARIA DEL POZZO N. 155 402 BIANCO GIUSEPPINA Sez. 21 nata il 10/06/1982 a NAPOLI (NA) VIA CIRCUMVALLAZIONE N. 11 571 CAPUANO MARIAROSARIA Sez. 24 nata il 30/06/1974 a NAPOLI (NA) VIA COSTANTINOPOLI N. 32 648 CAU NADIA Sez. 4 nata il 07/10/1983 a NAPOLI (NA) VIA COL. GAETANO ALIPERTA N. 9 676 CERCIELLO ESTER Sez. 11 nata il 31/10/1983 a NAPOLI (NA) VIA MARIGLIANO N. 17/A 686 CERCIELLO IMMACOLATA Sez. 6 nata il 30/04/1973 a NAPOLI (NA) VIA MERCATO VECCHIO N. 85 687 CERCIELLO LAURA Sez. 27 nata il 05/03/1983 a OTTAVIANO (NA) VIA MALATESTA N. 11 P. T 693 CERCIELLO MARIA GRAZIA Sez. 20 nata il 24/01/1952 a SOMMA VESUVIANA (NA) VIA PIZZONE CASSANTE N. 12 694 CERCIELLO MICHELA Sez. 18 nata il 16/02/1974 a TORRE DEL GRECO (NA) CORSO ITALIA N. 3 Citta' di SOMMA VESUVIANA Provincia di NAPOLI Numero Pag.
    [Show full text]
  • Comune Di Somma Vesuviana (Napoli) Voucher Farmaceutici - Vii Edizione Graduatoria Beneficiari Ammessi
    COMUNE DI SOMMA VESUVIANA (NAPOLI) VOUCHER FARMACEUTICI - VII EDIZIONE GRADUATORIA BENEFICIARI AMMESSI N. COGNOME NOME DATA DI NASCITA LUOGO DI NASCITA PUNTEGGIO 1 P. M. 29/10/1979 Napoli 11 2 B. F. 26/03/1977 Napoli 11 3 S. C. 21/11/1981 Napoli 11 4 S. R. 18/08/1987 Somma Vesuviana 11 5 F. A. 23/03/1956 Pimonte 11 6 R. N. 01/01/1972 Marocco 11 7 D. L. A. 17/10/1975 Napoli 11 8 M. A. 24/10/1964 Marigliano 11 9 R. P. 17/11/1976 Napoli 11 10 D. S. M. 16/09/1981 Napoli 11 11 M. A. 06/06/1983 Napoli 11 12 P. R. 21/11/1990 Torre del Greco 11 13 F. B. 24/03/1975 Napoli 11 14 C. A. M. 13/06/1980 San Giuseppe Vesuviano 11 15 D. M. I. 30/05/1969 Napoli 11 16 M. E. 08/09/1991 Ottaviano 11 17 C. R. 02/01/1984 S.Felice a Cancello 11 18 M. L. 06/01/1963 Cercola 11 19 B. R. 14/04/1971 Napoli 11 20 Z. L. 15/05/1983 Napoli 11 21 S. V. 03/05/1974 San Giuseppe Vesuviano 11 22 B. G. 03/10/1981 Napoli 11 23 M. G. 11/10/1989 Napoli 11 24 E. A. 22/07/1973 Roma 11 25 A. A. 01/01/1969 Somma Vesuviana 11 26 C. M. 07/10/1979 San Giuseppe Vesuviano 11 27 V. A. 20/09/1979 Napoli 11 28 B. A. 29/12/1992 Pollena Trocchia 11 29 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Heavy Metals and Polychlorinated Biphenyls In
    Symbiosis www.symbiosisonlinepublishing.com ISSN Online: 2372-0921 Case Report Cancer Science & Research: Open Access Open Access Determination of Heavy Metals and Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Oncological Patients: A Pilot Study V Petrosino1*, M Coletta2 and D Testa2 1ASL Salerno, International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE) , Salerno, Italy 2ENT Clinic, University of Naples, via S. Pansini, 5,80131 Naples, Italy Received: August 21, 2019; Accepted: September 30, 2019; Published: October 03, 2019 *Corresponding author: Petrosino Vincenzo, ASL Salerno, International Society of Doctors for the Environment (ISDE) , Salerno, Italy, E-mail: petro- [email protected] The environment is the surroundings in which we live and Abstract with which we continuously interact. Everyone has a very close A large number of studies in the literature increasingly suggest a relationship with the environment from which we can get any causal relationship between the onset of cancer and other diseases and kind of noxae that, acting in different ways on our body, can cause the exposure to environmental pollutants, particularly heavy metals, – through various mechanisms, often still unknown – a number of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and other products. Environmental short-, medium- and long-term changes. pollution seems to be an important determinant for the onset of several diseases, so special attention must be paid to this question. A large number of studies in the literature increasingly suggest a causal relationship between the onset of cancer and Recently, some authors, by measuring heavy metals in cancer tissue, have come to the conclusion that these metals can accumulate other diseases and the exposure to environmental pollutants, in tumor tissue and, through different mechanisms and actions, can particularly heavy metals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and stimulate the progression of breast cancers and reduce the sensitivity other products.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambito Territoriale N16 Legge 328/00
    AMBITO TERRITORIALE N16 LEGGE 328/00 Comuni di Calvizzano, Melito di Napoli, Mugnano di Napoli, Qualiano, Villaricca – Distretto 39 e 40 ASL Na2 NORD Comune Capofila: Melito di Napoli REGOLAMENTO PER IL FUNZIONAMENTO DEL COORDINAMENTO ISTITUZIONALE DELL’AMBITO TERRITORIALE SOCIALE N16 (ex art. 11, comma 3 della L.R. 11/2007) Approvato dal Coordinamento Istituzionale con delibera commissariale n. ___ del _______ Approvato con Deliberazione Commissariale n. …..del 1 AMBITO TERRITORIALE N16 LEGGE 328/00 Comuni di Calvizzano, Melito di Napoli, Mugnano di Napoli, Qualiano, Villaricca – Distretto 39 e 40 ASL Na2 NORD Comune Capofila: Melito di Napoli In attuazione della Legge Quadro 328 dell‟8 novembre 2000 (“Legge quadro per la realizzazione del sistema integrato di interventi e servizi sociali”), pubblicata nella Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 265 del 13 novembre 2000 e della Legge Regionale n. 11 del 23 ottobre 2007 (“Legge per la dignità e la cittadinanza sociale. Attuazione della Legge 8 novembre 2000 n. 328”), nonché delle linee di programmazione regionale, l‟Ambito territoriale sociale N16, nella novella composizione definita con Delibera di Giunta Regionale della Campania n. 320 del 3.7.2012, approva il seguente Regolamento ART.1 OGGETTO DEL REGOLAMENTO Il presente Regolamento disciplina le attribuzioni e la modalità di funzionamento del Coordinamento Istituzionale dell‟Ambito territoriale sociale N16 (di seguito Ambito N16), istituito quale Organo di indirizzo programmatico, di coordinamento e di controllo politico - amministrativo per la gestione del Piano Sociale di Zona dell‟Ambito N16 e del Piano di Azione Territoriale (di seguito P.A.T.), riguardo a quest‟ultimo per la sola parte di competenza definita dalla normativa vigente.
    [Show full text]
  • Informazioni Personali Nome Emanuela Punzo Indirizzo Abitazione Telefono 081 7881224 – E-Mail [email protected] E
    CURRICULUM VITAE La sottoscritta Punzo Emanuela, nata a Napoli, il 03.05.1980, C.F.: PNZ MNL 80E43 F839 N , consapevole delle responsabilità civili e penali derivanti da false o mendaci dichiarazioni, falsità negli atti, e uso di atti falsi, ai sensi degli articoli 46 e 47 del D.P.R. 445/00, DICHIARA sotto la propria responsabilità, i seguenti stati, fatti e qualità personali: Informazioni personali Nome Emanuela Punzo Indirizzo abitazione Telefono 081 7881224 – E-mail [email protected] [email protected] Nazionalità Italiana Data di nascita 03.05.1980 Esperienza lavorativa attuale: Data 01/12/2017 – ad oggi Committente Comune di Ercolano (NA) Tipo di impiego Istruttore direttivo tecnico - cat. D1 -a tempo pieno e indeterminato, in servizio presso il settore Lavori Pubblici. Principali mansioni e Responsabile del servizio Opere Pubbliche Secondarie responsabilità Titolare di P.O. dal 01/01/2018 ; Data 01/10/2018 – ad oggi Committente Comune di Ercolano (NA) Tipo di impiego Istruttore direttivo tecnico - cat. D1 -a tempo pieno e indeterminato, in servizio presso il settore Lavori Pubblici. Principali mansioni e Responsabile dell’Ufficio Paesaggio – Decreto Sindacale n. 19/2019 responsabilità Data 29/03/2019 – ad oggi Committente Comune di Ercolano (NA) Tipo di impiego Istruttore direttivo tecnico - cat. D1 -a tempo pieno e indeterminato, in servizio presso il settore Lavori Pubblici. Principali mansioni e Responsabile VAS – Decreto Sindacale n. 99/2018 responsabilità Esperienza lavorativa precedente nella Pubblica Amministrazione: Data 02/11/2017 – 30/11/2017 Committente Comune di Somma Vesuviana (NA) Tipo di impiego Istruttore direttivo tecnico - cat. D1 -a tempo pieno e indeterminato, in servizio presso il settore Urbanistica.
    [Show full text]