DOCSLIB.ORG

Irish Plant Monitoring Scheme 2016 Pilot Grasslands Learn Plant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Irish Plant Monitoring Scheme 2016 Pilot Grasslands Help track changes in Ireland’s Flora Learn plant identification and help track changes in Ireland’s Flora Introduction What is it? The Irish Plant Monitoring Scheme has been developed so that we can better understand our environment and track changes in Ireland’s Flora. The scheme sets out to encourage, support and co-ordinate volunteers interested in botanical recording. It is also a fantastic learning experience, especially for beginners as you will be provided with ID guides, a structured way to record and a learning support system. Why should I take part? By taking part in the Irish Plant Monitoring Scheme you will be contributing to a national recording scheme, which will go on to help track changes in Ireland’s Flora. There is ample opportunity for you to upskill and learn more about plants, particularly if you are a beginner to botany. There is also a great opportunity for volunteers who are already familiar with wildflowers to learn new groups (grasses, sedges, etc.). The scheme enables you to claim a 1km² site to record within, there is potential for you to track changes (species, habitats, threats, etc.) in these sites into the future. This is particularly useful if you already regularly record at the site but aren’t making comprehensive lists of species, habitat type or potential threats. Methodology The entire scheme is managed using an online system at: (https://surveys.biodiversityireland.ie) This site allows you claim your survey site and is where you will submit your data. • Request 1km² site using online system (https://surveys.biodiversityireland.ie) • You can choose between a Priority site, Additional site or your own Elected site. • Priority Site – 40 sites which need to be covered for the survey, if there is one near you or you feel that you want to take on a priority site, that would be great! • Additional Site – Find sites which are local to you, with so many sites across the country you’re likely to find one which isn’t too far away. • Elected Site – If you would like to add a site, please get in touch and we will add the 1km² to the online system. • Make sure to get landowners permission before you start your survey. • Visit your chosen grassland site and take note of habitats and any other interesting features (geographical, archaeological, etc.). • A minimum of two plots should be carried out, if you feel that your site is extremely diverse then up to five plots can be carried out. • The plots should be a representative sample of the site you are studying. This will involve walking the area beforehand and then placing your plot in an area that you feel best represents the entire grassland. For example if the majority of your site includes grasses while only a very small amount contains wildflowers, do not complete all plots within the wildflower area, as it would not be representative of the entire area. While it may be difficult, try to be impartial and only use the results you have gained from walking around your site to influence your plot positioning. • Try and keep your plot away from heavily shaded treelines and walls as this will give skewed results. It is also important not to pick the area that looks the most or least interesting, being unbiased, impartial and using only the information you have gained from your initial assessment of the overall site. Methodology • Mark out a 2x2m plot – record all species found within (use identification guides to assist in the identification of plant species. You may come across certain species which are difficult to identify, use this booklet or other publications for help. If you can not work out what the species is then it is good to take detailed pictures of the plant (flower, leaves, overall form and any other distinctive features). Again, while high quality, detailed pictures are best, as long as the picture is clear and the features in focus (not blurry) then it should still be possible to get an identification. • While completing your plots and identifying species you should also assess the percentage cover of the plants present within your plot. • Any additional information or pictures relating to your site or plots (potential threats, land use and signs of management, etc.) are also very useful. Map Examples A copy of the site map (above) and the a user created site map (below). Plots 2m 2m 2m 2m 2X2m marked out with rope. Examples of marked out plots, all are ready to record in. The easiest way to mark out your plot is to use some rope/cord/tape and pegs. It’s much easier to pre-mark your cord before doing your site visit or to bring measuring tape. Recording Species This booklet aims to aid the identification of plants found during the recording season of the Irish Plant Monitoring Scheme. The plants below where chosen due to the likelihood that you would come across them on this survey, the basis for this choice is the Irish Semi-natural Grassland Survey 2007-2012. Some species and families are particularly difficult to identify, so we have developed online ID Guides for these tricky groups. If you see ID Guide beside your species you can find more detailed identification help. These can be accessed at – http://www.biodiversityireland.ie/projects/vascular-plants/plant-monitoring- scheme/resources/ There are also guides for grasses, sedges, rushes and other trickier groups online at the above site. - More likely to be found in a wet grassland. - More likely to be found in a dry grassland . Throughout this booklet the structure is – Common Name (Scientific name) (Flowering period) Irish Name Family Name Flowering period is displayed using numbers: 1 = January 12 = December So a flowering period between May and July would be (5-7). If you have never taken part or completed a survey like this, it can be useful to have a systematic approach to recording, especially if your are in an incredibly diverse site, as the number of species may appear daunting. • Record wildflowers first – you can make this recording more systematic by choosing to record by colour, taking blue flowers first, then purple, pink, white etc.. This will allow you maximise the usefulness of this booklet as this is also the order that species are displayed. • Record grasses/sedges/rushes – After recording the wildflowers that you know, it is best to move on to a slightly trickier group. There are online guides to help with grasses, sedges and rushes. • Take photographs - If you can not identify the species, be sure to take multiple photos. Be sure to get a picture of the flower, leaves, overall form and any other features which you feel may be useful to the identification. Try to get your photos clear and in focus and take lots from many different angles, the defining feature of the species may not be visible in a top-down picture. Take notes along with your photos, in particular height, the more information you give the better the chances are to get a correct identification. [ Pictures can be sent to [email protected] ] • Take samples - If you can not identify the species, you can take a sample back with you, in order to use a more comprehensive guide or key. If you take a sample (you will need to take the entire plant with you, be sure to pull the plant up and take basal leaves also) and still can not find the species be sure to safely store, so that you can show the species to a determiner at a later date. Only take a sample if there is a good population of the species growing in the location. Leaf Plate Oisín Duffy Oisín Duffy Trifoliate Heart-Shaped & Glossy Oisín Duffy Oisín Duffy Oisín Duffy Oisín Duffy Lanceolate Pinnate Trifoliate & Toothed Hairy & lobed Petals Sepals Sepals Petals Stem Stem Oisín Duffy Oisín Duffy Structure of a flower Structure of a flower Useful ID Guides • Wildflowers of Ireland – A Field Guide – Zoe Devlin • The Wildflower Key – Francis Rose • An Irish Flora – John Parnell and Tom Curtis • Biodiversity Ireland Grass Guide – Úna Fitzpatrick, Lynda Weekes & Mark Wright Brooklime (Veronica beccabunga) (5-9) Germander Speedwell (Veronica chamaedrys) (5-7) Lochall Veronicaceae ID Guide Lus cré talún Veronicaceae ID Guide • Creeping plant. • Low growing and hairy • Blue flower growing in plant. pairs of spikes. • Flowers are blue and • Leaves opposite, main stem has distinctive fleshy and hairless fringe of hairs. Zoe Devlin Zoe Devlin Oisín Duffy • Leaves opposite, oval and Up to 30cm Up to 20cm toothed. Heath Speedwell (Veronica officinalis) (5-8) Marsh Speedwell (Veronica scutellata) (6-8) Lus cré Veronicaceae ID Guide Lus cré corraigh Veronicaceae ID Guide • Small, upright plant • Creeping plant. forming a narrowing • Pale blue (sometimes white) spike. flowers on the end of weak, • Flowers pale blue to fragile looking stems. lilac. • Leaves opposite unstalked, Zoe Devlin Zoe Devlin Oisín Duffy • Leaves opposite, hairy, lanceolate. Up to 10cm oval and toothed. Up to 20cm Thyme-leaved Speedwell (Veronica serpyllifolia) (4-10) Wood Speedwell (Veronica montana) (4-7) Lus an treacha Veronicaceae ID Guide Lus cre coille Veronicaceae ID Guide • Dainty, creeping • Small, upright plant. plant. • Flowers are blue and white and • Lilac flowers with form loose spikes around the stems which are stem. hairy on all sides. • Leaves oval, glossy and slightly Oisín Duffy • Leaves, opposite toothed. Zoe Devlin Up to 20cm Up to 20cm oval and toothed. Tufted Forget-me-not (Myosotis laxa) (5-10) Water Forget-me-not (Myosotis scorpioides) (5-10) Ceotharnach beag Boraginaceae ID Guide Ceotharnach uisce Boraginaceae ID Guide • • Upright plant.
Recommended publications
  • Toward a Resolution of Campanulid Phylogeny, with Special Reference to the Placement of Dipsacales

    Toward a Resolution of Campanulid Phylogeny, with Special Reference to the Placement of Dipsacales

    TAXON 57 (1) • February 2008: 53–65 Winkworth & al. • Campanulid phylogeny MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS Toward a resolution of Campanulid phylogeny, with special reference to the placement of Dipsacales Richard C. Winkworth1,2, Johannes Lundberg3 & Michael J. Donoghue4 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461–CEP 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected] (author for correspondence) 2 Current address: School of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Private Bag, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji 3 Department of Phanerogamic Botany, The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106, U.S.A. Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG II, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diver- sity of the four largest lineages (Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, Dipsacales) as well as the smaller “unplaced” groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (atpB, matK, ndhF, rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (rps16 intron, trnT-F region, trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast dataset (all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these datasets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees.
  • Subalpine Larch (Larix Lyallii), Western Larch (Larix Occidentalis), and Tamarack (Larix Laricina)

    Subalpine Larch (Larix Lyallii), Western Larch (Larix Occidentalis), and Tamarack (Larix Laricina)

    Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2007)7 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 16-May-2007 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ English - Or. English ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE JOINT MEETING OF THE CHEMICALS COMMITTEE AND Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2007)7 THE WORKING PARTY ON CHEMICALS, PESTICIDES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 41 CONSENSUS DOCUMENT ON THE BIOLOGY OF THE NATIVE NORTH AMERICAN LARCHES: SUBALPINE LARCH (Larix lyalli), WESTERN LARCH (Larix occidentalis) AND TAMARACK (Larix laricina) English - Or. English JT03227278 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format ENV/JM/MONO(2007)7 Also published in the Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology: No. 1, Commercialisation of Agricultural Products Derived through Modern Biotechnology: Survey Results (1995) No. 2, Analysis of Information Elements Used in the Assessment of Certain Products of Modern Biotechnology (1995) No. 3, Report of the OECD Workshop on the Commercialisation of Agricultural Products Derived through Modern Biotechnology (1995) No. 4, Industrial Products of Modern Biotechnology Intended for Release to the Environment: The Proceedings of the Fribourg Workshop (1996) No. 5, Consensus Document on General Information concerning the Biosafety of Crop Plants Made Virus Resistant through Coat Protein Gene-Mediated Protection (1996) No. 6, Consensus Document on Information Used in the Assessment of Environmental Applications Involving Pseudomonas (1997) No. 7, Consensus Document on the Biology of Brassica napus L. (Oilseed Rape) (1997) No. 8, Consensus Document on the Biology of Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum (Potato) (1997) No. 9, Consensus Document on the Biology of Triticum aestivum (Bread Wheat) (1999) No.
  • Apiaceae) - Beds, Old Cambs, Hunts, Northants and Peterborough

    Apiaceae) - Beds, Old Cambs, Hunts, Northants and Peterborough

    CHECKLIST OF UMBELLIFERS (APIACEAE) - BEDS, OLD CAMBS, HUNTS, NORTHANTS AND PETERBOROUGH Scientific name Common Name Beds old Cambs Hunts Northants and P'boro Aegopodium podagraria Ground-elder common common common common Aethusa cynapium Fool's Parsley common common common common Ammi majus Bullwort very rare rare very rare very rare Ammi visnaga Toothpick-plant very rare very rare Anethum graveolens Dill very rare rare very rare Angelica archangelica Garden Angelica very rare very rare Angelica sylvestris Wild Angelica common frequent frequent common Anthriscus caucalis Bur Chervil occasional frequent occasional occasional Anthriscus cerefolium Garden Chervil extinct extinct extinct very rare Anthriscus sylvestris Cow Parsley common common common common Apium graveolens Wild Celery rare occasional very rare native ssp. Apium inundatum Lesser Marshwort very rare or extinct very rare extinct very rare Apium nodiflorum Fool's Water-cress common common common common Astrantia major Astrantia extinct very rare Berula erecta Lesser Water-parsnip occasional frequent occasional occasional x Beruladium procurrens Fool's Water-cress x Lesser very rare Water-parsnip Bunium bulbocastanum Great Pignut occasional very rare Bupleurum rotundifolium Thorow-wax extinct extinct extinct extinct Bupleurum subovatum False Thorow-wax very rare very rare very rare Bupleurum tenuissimum Slender Hare's-ear very rare extinct very rare or extinct Carum carvi Caraway very rare very rare very rare extinct Chaerophyllum temulum Rough Chervil common common common common Cicuta virosa Cowbane extinct extinct Conium maculatum Hemlock common common common common Conopodium majus Pignut frequent occasional occasional frequent Coriandrum sativum Coriander rare occasional very rare very rare Daucus carota Wild Carrot common common common common Eryngium campestre Field Eryngo very rare, prob.
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny

    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018

    State of New York City's Plants 2018

    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
  • Tuberaria Guttata (L.) Fourr

    Tuberaria Guttata (L.) Fourr

    Tuberaria guttata (L.) Fourr Spotted Rock-rose Tuberaria guttata flowers from May to June and is best searched for on warm and sunny mornings when the bright yellow, purple- blotched petals open widely and are readily visible. Populations are known from northern Wales, western and south-western Ireland, the Channel Islands and western Scotland, although there are doubts about its provenance at the sole Scottish locality. It occurs at coastal locations in exposed, well-drained rocky outcrops on moderately acidic shallow peats, typically where there is sparse vegetation cover, making populations particularly vulnerable to the encroachment of more competitive vegetation. It is assessed as Near Threatened in Britain, but is of Least Concern in Wales. ©Joh n Crellin IDENTIFICATION HABITATS In flower T. guttata is unmistakable, with bright yellow petals In Britain and Ireland T. guttata grows on exposed rocky that have purple blotches and opposite leaves that are three- outcrops in bare open stony or peaty patches amongst species- v eined and turn reddish with age. Plants are variable in size, poor Calluna vulgaris-Scilla verna and C. vulgaris-Erica ranging from solitary flowers on short stems (1-2 cm) in cinerea heathland (NVC H7, H10), and more rarely Festuca exposed sites to much taller (to 20 cm) branched stems with ovina-Agrostis capillaris-Galium saxatile (NVC U4d) multiple flowers in more sheltered localities. grassland. Tuberaria guttata tends to be concentrated where there is a SIMILAR SPECIES sparse cov er of grasses, ericaceous shrubs and other small herbs, and often grows in a thin carpet of mosses and lichens.
  • Floral Morphology in : Relation. to Adaptation And

    Floral Morphology in : Relation. to Adaptation And

    / FLORAL MORPHOLOGY IN : RELATION. TO ADAPTATION AND TAXONOMY IN, THE CARYOPHYLLACEAE BY . KATHERINE L NOVOSEL Thesis presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 1982 5.. ABSTRACT The floral morphology of several species in the 3 subfamilies of the family Caryophyllaceae has been investigated from different aspects. The reproductive biology of the family has been examined to determine if style number and stigmatic area are in any way related to ovule/seed number, and it has been found that there is no positive relationship. The genera in the family have also been placed in groups according to the distribution of the stigmatic papillae and the degree of style fusion. Species in 4 genera, Spergula, Spergularia, Stellaria, Myosoton have been examined in greater detail but again few correlations could be found. De-styling experiments on 3 5-styled species in the subfamily Dianthoideae have shown that pollen tubes readily cross between 'carpels' in these species and that if only 3 styles remain the number of seeds formed is the saine.as in 5-styled ovaries. The vascular tissue of the ovary and the position of the trans- mitting tissue has been studied in species in the subfamilies Dianthoideae and Paronychioideae. This has revealed that the trans- mitting tissue is part of the septal tissue and confirmed the views of other authors that the ovary in this family has not evolved from the traditional 'carpel' but that the ovary is composed of a sterile part and a fertile part. The taxonomy of the subfamily Paronychioideae has been investi- gated.
  • Flora and Vegetation Characteristics of the Natural Habitat of the Endangered Plant Pterygopleurum Neurophyllum

    Flora and Vegetation Characteristics of the Natural Habitat of the Endangered Plant Pterygopleurum Neurophyllum

    diversity Article Flora and Vegetation Characteristics of the Natural Habitat of the Endangered Plant Pterygopleurum neurophyllum Hwan Joon Park 1,2,*, Seongjun Kim 1,* , Chang Woo Lee 1, Nam Young Kim 1, Jung Eun Hwang 1, Jiae An 1, Hyeong Bin Park 1, Pyoung Beom Kim 3 and Byoung-Doo Lee 1 1 Division of Restoration Research, Research Center for Endangered Species, National Institute of Ecology, Yeongyang 36531, Korea; [email protected] (C.W.L.); [email protected] (N.Y.K.); [email protected] (J.E.H.); [email protected] (J.A.); [email protected] (H.B.P.); [email protected] (B.-D.L.) 2 Department of Ecology Landscape Architecture-Design, Jeonbuk University, Iksan 54596, Korea 3 Wetland Center, National Institute of Ecology, Changnyeong 50303, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.J.P.); [email protected] (S.K.) Abstract: This study analyzed the flora, life form, and vegetation of the Nakdong River wetland. Vegetation analysis was performed on 37 plots using the phytosociological method of the Zürich- Montpellier School. PCA analysis was conducted by using the vegetation data (ground cover of class; 1~9) of 37 plots surveyed by phytosociological method. PCA (Principal Component Analysis) was used to statistically analyze the objectivity of the community classification and the character species. The traditional classification and mathematical statistic methods were used. A total of 82 taxa belonging to 28 families, 65 genera, 72 species, 2 subspecies, and 8 varieties were present in the vegetation of the survey area. The life form was analyzed to be the Th-R5-D4-e type.
  • Identification of Giant Hogweed

    Identification of Giant Hogweed

    Identification of Giant Hogweed Giant hogweed is an introduced plant species in New Brunswick. Currently, there are very few confirmed locations of this plant in the province. The majority are associated with a gardener who planted giant hogweed, which subsequently spread by unmanaged seed production. Giant hogweed is highly competitive due to its vigorous early-season growth, tolerance of full shade, and its ability to withstand flooding. Because of its large size and rapid growth, it can quickly dominate invaded areas and substantially reduce the amount of suitable habitat available for native plants and wildlife. In addition, this plant can cause potential human health issues. Giant hogweed sap contains toxins that, after exposure to sunlight, can cause significant dermatitis on sensitive individuals. Temporary blindness can also be caused by exposure of the eyes to the sap. Many plants within New Brunswick are similar in appearance to giant hogweed, most belonging to the Apiaceae or carrot family. Proper identification is essential to manage any plant species. Some of the most common similar species are listed below, with information to aid in proper identification. Giant Hogweed Giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum, Berce du Caucase) is a member of the Apiaceae family. It typically grows very tall, from 1.5 to 5 metres in height. Its leaves are shiny and large, with very coarse and serrated leaf edges, like a jagged saw edge. The stems are very hairy and bristly with purple spots or blotches throughout. When mature, the plant produces flowers that form a large umbrella shape, up to 1.5 metres in diameter.
  • The Giant Hogweed Best Practice Manual

    The Giant Hogweed Best Practice Manual

    The giant hogweed best practice manual guidelines for the management and control of invasive weeds in Europe Booy, Olaf; Cock, Matthew; Eckstein, Lutz; Hansen, Steen Ole; Hattendorf, Jan; Hüls, Jörg; Jahodová, Sárka; Krinke, Lucás; Marovoková, Lanka; Müllerová, Jana; Nentwig, Wolfgang; Nielsen, Charlotte; Otte, Annette; Pergl, Jan; Perglová, Irena; Priekule, Ilze; Pusek, Petr; Ravn, Hans Peter; Thiele, Jan; Trybush, Sviatlana; Wittenberg, Rüdiger Publication date: 2005 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Booy, O., Cock, M., Eckstein, L., Hansen, S. O., Hattendorf, J., Hüls, J., Jahodová, S., Krinke, L., Marovoková, L., Müllerová, J., Nentwig, W., Nielsen, C., Otte, A., Pergl, J., Perglová, I., Priekule, I., Pusek, P., Ravn, H. P., Thiele, J., ... Wittenberg, R. (2005). The giant hogweed best practice manual: guidelines for the management and control of invasive weeds in Europe. Center for Skov, Landskab og Planlægning/Københavns Universitet. Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 The Giant Hogweed Best Practice Manual Guidelines for the management and control of an invasive weed in Europe manual_engelsk.pmd 45 14-07-2005, 14:20 About the publication Editors: Charlotte Nielsen, Hans Peter Ravn, Wolfgang Nentwig and Max Wade The project: Giant Alien Project (2002-2005) has been financed by the European Commission within the 5th Framework Pro- gramme, ’EESD – Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development’, contract no. EVK2-CT-2001-00128. Project partners are: Danish Centre for
  • The Bees and Wasps of Marsland Nature Reserve

    The Bees and Wasps of Marsland Nature Reserve

    The Bees and Wasps of Marsland Nature Reserve Mason wasp Invertebrate survey and habitat evaluation Patrick Saunders [email protected] http://kernowecology.co.uk 1 Introduction This document consists of habitat evaluation and management recommendations for Bees and Wasps (Aculeate hymenoptera) for the Devon Wildlife Trust Nature Reserve Marsland mouth. The survey and report was commissioned by DWT Reserve warden. Marsland Nature reserve description (Pilkington & Threlkeld 2012) • The reserve comprises 212 hectares, of which 186 hectares occurs in the Marsland Valley and 26 hectares in the Welcombe Valley. The site was designated a SSSI in 1952. In addition the reserve includes an unknown acreage of foreshore north of Welcombe Mouth for 4 kilometres, extending beyond South Hole Farm (SS219201). The boundary of the reserve is approximately 18 miles long and is very complex, mainly through following the seven separate tributary streams. The reserve is freehold owned by Devon Wildlife Trust • The primary interest of the reserve is as an example of a north Devon/Cornwall coombe valley with a variety of slopes, soil types and aspects and coastal area that gives rise to a similar diversity of habitats. The most important of these are the extensive areas of relatively pure oak woodland and oak coppice, the maritime grassland and grass heath and the alder woodland and wet flushes in the valley bottoms. • There is approximately 36h of grassland, 130h of woodland, 43h of coastal habitat and 1h of open water. • The reserve also lies within an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty with the Marsland Valley being highly representative of an unspoilt coastal coombe habitat.
  • Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae Based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa

    Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae Based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa

    Systematic Botany (2010), 35(2): pp. 425–441 © Copyright 2010 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogeny and Phylogenetic Nomenclature of the Campanulidae based on an Expanded Sample of Genes and Taxa David C. Tank 1,2,3 and Michael J. Donoghue 1 1 Peabody Museum of Natural History & Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P. O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520 U. S. A. 2 Department of Forest Resources & Stillinger Herbarium, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, P. O. Box 441133, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133 U. S. A. 3 Author for correspondence ( [email protected] ) Communicating Editor: Javier Francisco-Ortega Abstract— Previous attempts to resolve relationships among the primary lineages of Campanulidae (e.g. Apiales, Asterales, Dipsacales) have mostly been unconvincing, and the placement of a number of smaller groups (e.g. Bruniaceae, Columelliaceae, Escalloniaceae) remains uncertain. Here we build on a recent analysis of an incomplete data set that was assembled from the literature for a set of 50 campanulid taxa. To this data set we first added newly generated DNA sequence data for the same set of genes and taxa. Second, we sequenced three additional cpDNA coding regions (ca. 8,000 bp) for the same set of 50 campanulid taxa. Finally, we assembled the most comprehensive sample of cam- panulid diversity to date, including ca. 17,000 bp of cpDNA for 122 campanulid taxa and five outgroups. Simply filling in missing data in the 50-taxon data set (rendering it 94% complete) resulted in a topology that was similar to earlier studies, but with little additional resolution or confidence.