DOCSLIB.ORG

UFC 3-701-01 Dod Facilities Pricing Guide, with Change 8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UFC 3-701-01 Dod Facilities Pricing Guide, with Change 8 UFC 3-701-01 23 May 2018 Change 8, 3 Feb 2021 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DoD FACILITIES PRICING GUIDE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED UFC 3-701-01 23 May 2018 Change 8, 3 Feb 2021 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) DoD FACILITIES PRICING GUIDE Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use. Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder. Indicate the preparing activity beside the Service responsible for preparing the document. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS \2\ (Preparing Activity) /2/ NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/) Change No. Date Location 1 6-25-18 Update Table 3 with RUC. Text update 3-2. 2 5-28-19 Updated Tables for FY 2019 publication 3 7-29-19 Update Table 3 with RUC, Corrected Table 4-2 4 9-27-19 Updated data tables for Japan and Hawaii ACFs. Corrected 5 2-3-20 Updated Tables for FY20 publication, Changed RUC to PUC in Chapter 3, Added Chapter 5 6 7-09-20 Updated Table 3 with PUC, Minor text edits 3-2.2, 4-1.2 7 09-01-20 Edit 4-1.2 for consistency, Corrected Table 4-2 Conus and Table 3 8 02-03-2021 Updated Tables for FY21 publication, minor text edits This UFC supersedes UFC 3-701-01, dated March 2011. UFC 3-701-01 23 May 2018 Change 8, 3 Feb 2021 FOREWORD The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the most stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable. UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) are responsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense agencies should contact the preparing service for document interpretation and improvements. Technical content of UFC is the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group. Recommended changes with supporting rationale should be sent to the respective service proponent office by the following electronic form: Criteria Change Request. The form is also accessible from the Internet sites listed below. UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the following source: • Whole Building Design Guide web site http://dod.wbdg.org/. Refer to UFC 1-200-01, DoD Building Code (General Building Requirements), for implementation of new issuances on projects. AUTHORIZED BY: LARRY D. McCALLISTER, PhD, PE, JOSEPH E. GOTT, P.E. PMP, SES Chief Engineer Chief, Engineering and Construction Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Directorate of Civil Works U.S. Army Corps of Engineers EDWIN H. OSHIBA, SES, DAF MICHAEL McANDREW Deputy Director of Civil Engineers Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense DCS/Logistics, Engineering & (Construction) and Acting Deputy Assistant Force Protection Secretary of Defense (Housing) Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Sustainment) UFC 3-701-01 23 May 2018 Change 8, 3 Feb 2021 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) [REVISION] SUMMARY SHEET Document: UFC 3-701-01, DoD Facilities Pricing Guide Superseding: UFC 3-701-01, dated March 2011 Description: The document provides updated cost and pricing data in support of facility planning, investment and analysis needs. Reasons for Document: • This UFC provides updated cost and pricing data intended to support preparation of the DoD budget. Impact: • Provides consistency across the DoD for the development of budgets for military construction projects. Unification Issues None UFC 3-701-01 23 May 2018 Change 8, 3 Feb 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1-1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE. .......................................................................... 1 1-1.1 Chapter 2: Unit Costs for Military Construction Projects. ...................... 1 1-1.2 Chapter 3: Unit Costs for DoD Facilities Cost Models. ......................... 1 1-1.3 Chapter 4: Cost Adjustment Factors. .................................................... 1 1-1.4 \5\Chapter 5: Replacement Cost/5/ ........................................................ 1 1-2 APPLICABILITY. ....................................................................................... 1 1-3 DATA TABLES. ........................................................................................ 1 1-4 PROPONENT. ........................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER 2 UNIT COSTS FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ................. 4 2-1 OVERVIEW. .............................................................................................. 4 2-2 FACILITY UNIT COST TABLE. ................................................................ 4 2-3 GUIDANCE UNIT COST (GUC) DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY. ...... 4 2-3.1 Data Source. .......................................................................................... 4 2-3.2 Business Rules. ..................................................................................... 5 2-3.3 Data Normalization. ............................................................................... 5 2-3.4 Primary Facility Included Costs. ............................................................. 5 2-3.5 Primary Facility Excluded Costs. ........................................................... 6 2-3.6 Primary Facility Cost Considerations. .................................................... 7 CHAPTER 3 UNIT COSTS FOR DOD FACILITIES COST MODELS ............................ 8 3-1 OVERVIEW. .............................................................................................. 8 3-2 \5\PRV UNIT COSTS (PUC)/5/ .................................................................. 8 3-2.1 \5\ Definition and Use of PRV Unit Costs. /5/ ......................................... 8 3-2.2 \1\ Plant Replacement Value (PRV). /1/ ................................................. 8 3-3 SUSTAINMENT UNIT COSTS (SUC). ...................................................... 9 3-3.1 Definition. ............................................................................................... 9 3-3.2 Use of Sustainment Unit Costs. ........................................................... 10 3-4 UNIT COST SOURCES. .......................................................................... 11 3-4.1 Source 1 Published Data .................................................................... 11 3-4.2 Source 2 Similar Data ......................................................................... 11 3-4.3 Source 3 Derived Data ....................................................................... 11 i UFC 3-701-01 23 May 2018 Change 8, 3 Feb 2021 3-5 REVISING UNIT COSTS. ........................................................................ 11 CHAPTER 4 COST ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ........................................................... 13 4-1 LOCATION ADJUSTMENTS. ................................................................. 13 4-1.1 Application ........................................................................................... 13 4-1.2 Data Source ......................................................................................... 13 4-1.3 Survey.................................................................................................. 13 4-1.4 Force Majeure ...................................................................................... 14 4-1.5 User Requested Revisions .................................................................. 14 4-2 ESCALATION. ........................................................................................ 14 4-2.1 Military Construction. ........................................................................... 14 4-2.2 Plant Replacement Value Escalation Rates. ........................................ 14 4-2.3 Facilities Sustainment. ......................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 5 \5\REPLACEMENT COST/5/ ................................................................... 16 5-1 REPLACEMENT COST ........................................................................... 17 5-1.1 Definition of Replacement Cost ........................................................... 17 5-1.2 Use of Replacement Cost .................................................................... 17 5-1.3 Considerations ..................................................................................... 17 APPENDIX A REFERENCES ....................................................................................... 19 ii UFC 3-701-01 23 May 2018 Change 8, 3 Feb 2021 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE. The DoD Facilities Pricing Guide supports
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Engineering and Engineering Technology
    Engineering and Engineering Technology Career Information Definition according to the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET): Engineering is the profession in which knowledge of the mathematical and natural sciences gained by study, experience, and practice is applied with judgment to develop ways to utilize economically the materials and forces of nature for the benefit of mankind. Engineering Technology is the part of the technological field that requires the application of scientific and engineering knowledge and methods combined with technical skills in support of engineering activities; it lies in the occupational spectrum between the craftsman and the engineer at the end of the spectrum closest to the engineer. Difference between Engineering Technology and Engineering Technical engineering projects involve research, complex analysis/design, development, manufacturing, test/evaluation, production, operation and distribution/sales of a finished and successful product. Engineers are mostly involved in the initial phase, whereas engineering technologists are mostly involved in the final phases. Their roles overlap in the development, manufacturing and test/evaluation of a product. Therefore, Engineering Technology is all about applying engineering principles to get the job done successfully (Applications Engineering). Engineers are the scientists within the team with in-depth math/science knowledge. Engineering technologists work as technical members of the engineering team with math/science background. Cal Poly
    [Show full text]
  • Chief of Facilities Engineering-WW-Facilities
    JOB DESCRIPTION CHIEF OF FACILITIES ENGINEERING (FACILITIES DIVISION) WATERWORKS Human Resources Department 700 Town Center Drive, Suite 200 Newport News, VA 23606 NEWPORT NEWS, VA Phone: (757) 926-1800 CITY OF OPPORTUNITY Fax: (757) 926-1825 GENERAL STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES Under limited supervision, this position is responsible for the oversight and management of the Facilities Engineering Branch of the Department of Waterworks. Reports to the Facilities Manager. ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS Responsible for the effective supervision and administration of the Facilities Engineering Branch including budget preparation and monitoring, development of capital improvement plans, purchasing and financial transactions, preparation of reports, performance management, employee relations, prioritizing and assigning work and related activities. Oversees and serves as project manager on major water utility projects; identifies, researches, and recommends project needs, plans, and scope of work; drafts requests for proposals; assists in selecting contractors; oversees and monitors work performed by contractors to ensure that contract plans, scope and specifications are being followed; oversees project inspections; interprets, contracts, resolves conflicts, and negotiates contract changes as appropriate; reviews and recommends invoices for payment. Ensures the safety, security, and regulatory compliance of all work assigned. Coordinates, develops, and recommends long-range plans pertaining to the maintenance, rehabilitation and new construction of
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Engineering-2019-Maintenance-Report.Pdf
    Facilities Maintenance March 2019 Sponsored by Table of contents Section Pages Introduction and methodology 3 Summary of findings 4 Respondent profile 5-9 Facility maintenance 10-24 Additional resources 25 2 Introduction and methodology Objective This study was completed by Plant Engineering to evaluate the maintenance practices and strategies currently in place in manufacturing facilities and the effects of maintenance on productivity and profitability. Sample The sample was selected from recipients of Plant Engineering for whom email addresses were available. Only respondents responsible for maintenance for all or part of their facilities were asked about maintenance strategies, outsourcing maintenance, training, technologies, and unscheduled downtime. Method Subscribers were sent an email asking them to participate in this study. The email included a URL linked to the questionnaire. ▪ Data collected: Dec. 21, 2018, through Jan. 9, 2019 ▪ Number of respondents: 199 o Margin of error: +/- 6.9% at a 95% confidence level ▪ Incentive: Survey participants were offered the opportunity to enter a drawing for a chance to receive a $100 Amazon.com gift card. 3 Summary of findings • Maintenance strategies: Seventy-eight percent of manufacturing facilities follow a preventive maintenance strategy; 61% have a computerized maintenance management system (CMMS), and 56% use a run-to-failure method. • Scheduled maintenance: Fifty-three percent of facilities allocate up to 10% of their annual operating costs to maintenance processes; 30% devote more than 10% of this budget on maintenance. The average facility spends 20 hours each week on scheduled maintenance. • Attention to systems: Rotating equipment (motors, power transmission, etc.), fluid power systems (air, hydraulic, etc.), and plant automation systems are the three areas where facilities dedicate the most maintenance support, followed by internal electrical distribution systems and material handling equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • January 13, 2017 RE: Request For
    State of Vermont Agency of Transportation Contract Administration Finance & Administration One National Life Drive [fax] 802-828-5545 Montpelier VT 05633-5001 vtrans.vermont.gov/contract-admin January 13, 2017 RE: Request for Proposals (RFP) – Facilities Engineering Consultant Services 2016 – Civil, Architectural, Structural, Electrical and/or Mechanical Engineering The State of Vermont, acting through the Agency of Transportation (VTrans), is requesting proposals from engineering consultation for various facilities projects throughout the State including, but not limited to in the development of facility construction/repair plans, creation of property surveys, and other engineering work associated with highway and transportation buildings. Engineering Services requested include Civil Engineering, Architectural Engineering, Structural Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. Consultants may propose for one or more than one type of engineering service. All work will be accomplished in accordance with the provisions set forth in this Request for Proposals (RFP), and with the following: Scope of Work (SOW) dated December 8, 2016; Procedures for Selecting Contractors and Specifications for Contractor Services document including Customary State Contract Provisions, dated August 28, 2008, Revised December 29, 2008; General Special Provisions dated November 22, 2011; and Standard State Provisions for Contracts and Grants dated July 1, 2016, all of which are attached hereto. All applicable Federal, State, and local regulations will be followed. All questions or requests for clarification related to this RFP shall be forwarded in writing to the VTrans Point of Contact at: Bonnie Sanders, Agency of Transportation, Contract Administration, 1 National Life Drive, Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 - or - e-mail to [email protected] Subject Line: Facilities Engineering Consultant Services 2016 - or - Faxed to (802) 828-5545 Attention: Bonnie Sanders Subject Line: Facilities Engineering Consultant Services 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus – Egr 590 Introduction to Facilities
    SYLLABUS – EGR 590 / CE 590 INTRODUCTION TO FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYSTEMS FALL 2019 Days and Dates: Mondays from August 26 through December 3, 2018 (14 Class Sessions) All exams will be administered during scheduled class sessions – no separate final exam date is scheduled Time: 6:00 to 8:45 PM with a 15 minute break Location: Mann Hall room 406 INSTRUCTOR James A. Rispoli, M.S. (Civil Engineering), M.A. Business, P.E. Senior Lecturer, Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Professor of Practice, Center for Nuclear Energy Facilities and Structures, Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, NC State University 215 Mann Hall (919) 515-7628 [email protected] Office Hours: One-half hour or more if needed, prior to each Monday class session. Other times by appointment. Since there will be both on-campus students and distance-ed students, opportunities for telephone discussion with individual students can be arranged by email. COURSE OVERVIEW This course is intended to build on a traditional bachelor’s degree in an engineering discipline, and introduce the engineer graduate students to a multi-disciplinary approach to engineering and management required in the field of facilities engineering. James Rispoli, the course instructor, is a licensed professional engineer with 15 years experience at installation level: as chief of engineering, chief of facilities planning and programming, director of facilities and public works at a major airport, and director of public works, facilities and environment at a major seaport. Additionally, he was facilities and environmental planning department head for a federal agency, covering installations in a 24 state area.
    [Show full text]
  • NAVFAC P-300 Management of Transportation Equipment
    APPROVED FOR Naval Facilities Engineering Command PUBLIC RELEASE 200 Stovall Street Alexandria, Virginia 22332-2300 MANAGEMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT NAVFAC P-300 MAY 1997 NAVFAC P-300 May 1997 MANAGEMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SUPPORT EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND 200 Stovall Street Alexandria, VA 22332-2300 STANDARD NAVY DISTRIBUTION LIST (SNDL) 21A(1) FA39(1) FD2(1) FKA8F4(1) FN(1) 22A(1) FA44(1) FE(2) FKM8(1) FR3(1) 23(1) FA46(4) FF1(1) FKM9(2) FR4(1) 24(1) FA47(2) FF5(2) FKM11(1) FR7(1) 39(2) FA49(1) FF6(1) FKM12(1) FR9(1) 41A(1) FB6(1) FF17(1) FKM14(2) FR14(1) 41B(1) FB7(2) FF38(4) FKN1(2) FR15(1) 41C(1) FB10(2) FF42(2) FKN2(2) FR19(1) 41D(1) FB13(2) FF72(1) FKN3(1) FR23(1) 41K(1) FB21(2) FF74(6) FKN7(1) FS(1) A6(1) FB28(2) FG1(2) FKN13(1) FT1(1) C20D(1) FB30(1) FG2(2) FKP1E(2) FT6(2) C21(1) FB34(1) FG6(2) FKP1H(1) FT19(1) C25F(1) FB42(1) FH1(1) FKP1J(2) FT20(2) C28E(1) FB44(1) FH4(2) FKP4(1) FT22(1) C31J(1) FB45(1) FH7(1) FKP7(5) FT27(1) C52C(1) FB48(1) FH8(1) FKP8(1) FT28(1) C60A(1) FB54(6) FH16(1) FKP9(1) FT31(1) C84M(3) FB58(2) FI1(1) FKP16(1) FT37(100) D3B(1) FB60(1) FJB1(1) FKP25(1) FT45(1) E3(1) FC3(2) FJB2(1) FKQ(2) FT55(1) FA6(2) FC5(1) FJB4(1) FKR1A(2) FT104(4) FA7(2) FC7(2) FJB5(1) FKR1B(1) FT108(2) FA10(2) FC14(2) FKA1(2) FKR6A(1) FW1(2) FA18(2) FC16(1) FKA8F1(1) FKR6B(1) FW3(2) FA23(1) FC17(2) FKA8F2(1) FKR7A(1) FW4(1) FA24(2) FD1(1) Naval Facilities Additional copies may be Engineering Command obtained from: Code 134 200 Stovall St.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southeast Division
    CONTRACT SUMMARY NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND SOUTHEAST DIVISION INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL AND WASTE MANAGEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES This contract was established as an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity, firm fixed price, architect/engineer contract. Integrated CONTRACT Product Teams (IPT) and any other government agencies within NUMBER the areas covered by this contract may issue task orders. The N69450-18-D-0019 core A/E team at NAVFAC Southeast administers the procurement PROGRAM MANAGER of this contract. MSE Group, LLC Michael Orcino, PE Required services include environmental, technical, and [email protected] engineering tasks at various locations under the cognizance 407.470.7190 of NAVFAC Southeast. The contract provides services for DoD PERFORMANCE DATE and non-DoD facilities located in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, August 2018–August 2023 South Carolina, and the Caribbean as well as environmental and engineering services at activities located within the entire MAXIMUM VALUE NAVFAC area of responsibility (AOR) worldwide. $10 million CONTRACT LOCATION Worldwide TYPE/DESCRIPTION Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity, ABOUT US Architect/Engineer Contract for Hazardous MSE Group, LLC, is an international environmental, Material and Waste Management engineering, and construction firm providing qualified and Environmental Engineering Services competitive environmental, engineering, and health and CONTRACTING OFFICE safety services to public and private entities nationwide. NAVFAC Southeast Success for our clients, teaming partners, and employees ACQ CORE - AE/PPV/CE is derived from an intense work ethic and the ability to Bldg. 903, PO Box 30 enjoy the journey. Jacksonville, FL 32212-0030 We are an SBA-certified 8(a), EDWOSB 8(m), DBE 904.542.6915 business with additional state and local small business and minority certifications in numerous states across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilities Engineering
    ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS delta-eas.com FACILITIES ENGINEERING Delta provides comprehensive project management, planning, design, and construction support services for all phases of new and renovation facilities projects from architectural concept through construction completion. We deliver an integrated package of architectural, civil, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection, environmental, and construction administration services that incorporate leading edge technology and are driven by client design standards. STRUCTURAL Our structural engineers provide independent structural analysis of existing facilities as well as collaborate across disciplines for the development of new structures. Our engineers play essential roles in the design and verification of safe and structurally sound facilities such as residences, offices, parking garages, and commercial manufacturing environments. SITE/CIVIL Our site/civil engineers consult with regard to site feasibility and selection and then follow up with a complete portfolio of design solutions. Our site preparation services cover road and parking Visions FCU Country Club Road Addition and Renovations facilities, drainage, water supply, utility planning, and overall planning and permit support. We also develop stormwater pollution prevention plans (SWPPP), erosion and sediment control plans, sanitary sewer plans, and retaining wall solutions. MECHANICAL Delta has earned a long-standing reputation for design excellence for mechanical systems that serve educational, health care, correctional, industrial, commercial, and residential clients. Our engineers develop new systems as well as retrofit solutions for all types of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. Design work is typically performed within a Building Information Modeling (BIM) workflow to ensure a fully coordinated final design. ELECTRICAL Our electrical engineers provide large and small scale facility SUNY Plattsburgh Wilson Hall Dormitory Renovations electrical system design for a wide range of clients.
    [Show full text]
  • Deferred Maintenance Assessment Report: FY16 NASA-Wide Standardized Deferred Maintenance Parametric Estimate (Full Assessment)
    DEFERRED MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In Fiscal Year 2016 (FY16), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) performed its fifteenth consecutive facilities condition assessment and Deferred Maintenance (DM) cost estimate. Executive Order (EO) 13327, Federal Real Property Asset Management, requires federal agencies to catalog real property and develop methods to improve operational and financial management of real property. EO 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental Energy, and Transportation Management, and EO 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, also provide additional requirements for sustainable design and high performance buildings. The DM assessment is one element of NASA’s broader real property management efforts. The DM assessment provides facility condition evaluations that satisfy the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board’s (FASAB) Deferred Maintenance Reporting For Federal Facilities, Meeting the Requirements of Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Standard Number 6, as Amended, Accounting for Property, Plant and Equipment (PP&E), June 1996, and Standard Number 42, as amended, Deferred Maintenance and Repairs, April 25, 2012. The assessment results also satisfy NASA’s requirement to report on facilities’ condition in its annual Performance and Accountability Report. Facility condition is one of the four first-tier performance measures established by the Federal Real Property Council (FRPC), which is required to be reported each year to the Federal Real Property Profile (FRPP). The Facilities Engineering Division and the Comptroller can utilize the DM cost estimate to provide a useful metric of facility requirements during the budget evaluation process. In addition, the results are used as a performance metric for the effectiveness of facility maintenance programs, serve as a guide for investment and budgeting, and play an integral role in meeting the requirements of Executive Orders 13327, 13423, and 13514.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Engineering Manual, Comdtinst M11000.11B
    U.S. Department of Homeland Security United States Coast Guard CIVIL ENGINEERING MANUAL Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited. COMDTINST M11000.11B MAY 2014 Commandant Stop 7714 United States Coast Guard 2703 Martin Luther King, Jr. Ave SE Washington, DC 20593-7714 Staff Symbol: CG-43 Phone: (202) 475-5604 Fax: (202) 475-5959 COMDTINST M11000.11B 02 MAY 2014 COMMANDANT INSTRUCTION M11000.11B Subj: CIVIL ENGINEERING MANUAL 1. PURPOSE. This Manual promulgates Coast Guard Civil Engineering policy and selected procedures. 2. ACTION. All Coast Guard unit commanding officers, officers-in-charge, deputy/assistant commandants, and chiefs of headquarters staff elements shall comply with the provisions of this Manual. Internet release is authorized. 3. DIRECTIVES AFFECTED. Civil Engineering Manual, COMDTINST M11000.11A, Field Planning Manual, COMDTINST 11000.17, and Shore Facilities Project Development Manual (SFPDM), COMDTINST M11010.14 are cancelled. 4. DISCLAIMER. This guidance is not a substitute for applicable legal requirements, nor is it itself a rule. It is intended to provide guidance for Coast Guard personnel and is not intended to impose legally binding requirements on any party outside the Coast Guard. 5. MAJOR CHANGES. This Manual is a complete rewrite of the previous Civil Engineering Manual and is organized as follows: a. Chapter 1: Discusses the Coast Guard Civil Engineering program responsibilities, organization, and principles for shore infrastructure logistics support. b. Chapters 2-5: Identifies Coast Guard Civil Engineering resources and policies. These chapters identify the Shore Organizational Level Maintenance Program, Shore Depot Level Maintenance Program, and Shore Acquisition, Construction, and Improvement Programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilities Engineering & Maintenance Services
    Crown Energy Services, Inc., dba Able Engineering Services Facilities Engineering & Maintenance Services GSA Multiple Award Schedule Contract No. GS-21F-0226W Schedule No. 03FAC Contract Period: 9/27/10-9/26/15 Ordering/Business Contact: Devin Mastrippolito 868 Folsom Street San Francisco, CA 94107 415/546-6534 [email protected] [ENGINEERING SERVICES] Table of Contents HOURLY PRICE 1 QUALIFICATIONS 2 Company Background Core Expertise Relevant GSA Experience OPERATING STRATEGY 4 Our Primary Objective Quality Control Injury and Illness Prevention/Safety Management Approach Preventive Maintenance Program Procurement Program Emergency Response Planning OUTLINE OF SERVICES 9 Standard Services & Benefits Education & Training Programs ABLE’S SUSTAINABILITY PLATFORM 14 Green Initiatives Energy Expertise Recognized Excellence CONTACT US 15 [ENGINEERING SERVICES] 1 Hourly Price 811 002 Complete Facilities Maintenance and 003 97 Ancillary Repair and Alterations Service Proposed Hourly Price (Job Title/Task) (Midwest Union Local 399) Facility Manager (salaried) $86.50 Director of Engineering (salaried) $89.83 Project Manager (salaried) $83.04 Administrative Assistant $27.68 Chief Engineer $59.23 Assistant Chief Engineer $55.06 Engineer $47.10 Painter $41.52 Electrician $51.90 General Maintenance $38.75 **NOTE: Descriptions for each of the job titles in the table above are included as an appendix to this proposal. [ENGINEERING SERVICES] 2 Qualifications Company Background AES engineering manager has also served as a chief engineer, thus bringing
    [Show full text]
  • Facilities Engineering Seminar
    Facilities Engineering Seminar Rancho Bernardo Inn · San Diego, CA November 7-9, 2007 (business casual attire is suggested for this seminar) Wednesday, November 7 7:30 - 8:30 a.m. Registration and Continental Breakfast (Aragon Pre-Function Area) 8:30 - 8:45 a.m. Welcome and Opening Remarks (Aragon I & II) Kurt Nagle Antonio (Tony) Gioiello President & CEO Chief Harbor Engineer American Association of Port Authorities Port of Los Angeles Alexandria, VA Bruce B. Hollingsworth President and CEO Port of San Diego 8:45 – 10:15 a.m. Panel I: Logistics Part I (Aragon I & II) Congestion is already a major cause for concern on our highways. Our seaborne trade is growing and will continue to grow at rates forecast to be in the region of 6 – 10% per annum through 2020, putting an even greater strain on our road networks. Driver shortages, changes in driver operating hours, increasing gas prices, and stricter environmental controls are all additional factors which can limit the potential volume of road traffic. Railroads, Waterways and Short Sea Shipping can provide viable and much needed alternative capacity in future years. This session will explore the effectiveness of these alternatives; discuss their inter-relationship and the potential effects which each can have on traffic flows in and out of the ports, and around our coast. Moderator: Vancouver, BC Transportation Geoff Stokoe Logistics Study Executive Consultant Philip Davies Strategy, LLC Vice President Halcrow Consulting Inc. Barnaby, BC 10:15 – 10:30 a.m. Break (Aragon Pre-Function Area) • Sponsored by BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc., Federal Way, WA 10:30 a.m.
    [Show full text]