DOCSLIB.ORG

Vegetation and Wildlife Surveys at the National Renewable

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vegetation and Wildlife Surveys at the National Renewable Vegetation and Wildlife Surveys at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, South Table Mountain June 2010 – May 2011 Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC Boulder, Colorado NREL Technical Monitor: Tom Ryon NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Subcontract Report NREL/SR-1900-70464 July 2018 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Vegetation and Wildlife Surveys at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, South Table Mountain June 2010 – May 2011 Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC Boulder, Colorado NREL Technical Monitor: Tom Ryon Prepared under Subcontract No. LGF-0-40734-01 Suggested Citation Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers, LLC (2018). Vegetation and Wildlife Surveys at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, South Table Mountain: June 2010 – May 2011. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/SR-1900-70464. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy18osti/70464.pdf. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Subcontract Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/SR-1900-70464 Golden, CO 80401 July 2018 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 This publication was reproduced from the best available copy submitted by the subcontractor and received no editorial review at NREL. NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reports produced after 1991 and a growing number of pre-1991 documents are available free via www.OSTI.gov. Cover Photos by Dennis Schroeder: (left to right) NREL 26173, NREL 18302, NREL 19758, NREL 29642, NREL 19795. NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content. 2010-2011 Vegetation and Wildlife Surveys at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, South Table Mountain Jefferson County, Colorado August 12, 2011 Purchase Order Number 19601000 Technical Monitor: Thomas Ryon Prepared for Prepared by This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications National Renewable Energy Lab, South Table Mountain 2010-2011 Vegetation and Wildlife Surveys TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3 METHODS ........................................................................................................................ 3 Vegetation Mapping.................................................................................................................. 3 Noxious Weeds ......................................................................................................................... 5 General Wildlife Surveys .......................................................................................................... 5 Bird Surveys ............................................................................................................................. 5 Raptor Surveys ......................................................................................................................... 5 Large Mammal Surveys ........................................................................................................... 6 Mammalian Predator Surveys .................................................................................................. 6 Small Mammal Surveys ........................................................................................................... 6 Reptile and Amphibian Survey ................................................................................................ 6 Terrestrial Arthropod Survey ................................................................................................... 6 Targeted Wildlife Species ......................................................................................................... 7 Breeding Bird Density Surveys ................................................................................................ 7 Nocturnal Surveys .................................................................................................................... 8 Mule Deer Surveys ................................................................................................................... 8 Carnivore Camera Surveys ....................................................................................................... 8 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................ 10 Vegetation Mapping................................................................................................................ 10 Grasslands .............................................................................................................................. 10 Short-grass grassland............................................................................................................. 10 Mixed-grass grassland ........................................................................................................... 10 Upland Shrublands ................................................................................................................. 11 Tall Shrubland ........................................................................................................................ 11 Short Shrubland ...................................................................................................................... 11 Ravine Shrublands .................................................................................................................. 11 Wetlands ................................................................................................................................. 11 Disturbed/Reclaimed .............................................................................................................. 12 Developed ............................................................................................................................... 12 Noxious Weeds ....................................................................................................................... 14 Wildlife Survey Results .......................................................................................................... 16 General Wildlife Surveys ........................................................................................................ 24 Birds ....................................................................................................................................... 24 Raptors ................................................................................................................................... 25 Large Mammals ...................................................................................................................... 26 Mammalian Predators............................................................................................................. 27 Small Mammals ...................................................................................................................... 27 Reptiles and Amphibians........................................................................................................ 28 i This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications National Renewable Energy Lab, South Table Mountain 2010-2011 Vegetation and Wildlife Surveys Terrestrial Arthropods ............................................................................................................ 28 Targeted Wildlife Surveys ...................................................................................................... 29 Breeding Bird Densities ......................................................................................................... 29 Nocturnal Wildlife .................................................................................................................. 29 Mule Deer ............................................................................................................................... 30 Carnivore Camera .................................................................................................................. 30 Special Status Species ............................................................................................................. 30 DISCUSSION .................................................................................................................. 32 Vegetation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution
    Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution by William Allen Freyman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology and the Designated Emphasis in Computational and Genomic Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Dr. Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Dr. John P. Huelsenbeck Dr. Brent D. Mishler Dr. Kipling W. Will Fall 2017 Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution Copyright 2017 by William Allen Freyman Abstract Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution by William Allen Freyman Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology and the Designated Emphasis in Computational and Genomic Biology University of California, Berkeley Dr. Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Key evolutionary transitions have shaped the tree of life by driving the processes of spe- ciation and extinction. This dissertation aims to advance statistical and computational ap- proaches that model the timing and nature of these transitions over evolutionary trees. These methodological developments in phylogenetic comparative biology enable formal, model- based, statistical examinations of the macroevolutionary consequences of trait evolution. Chapter 1 presents computational tools for data mining the large-scale molecular sequence datasets needed for comparative phylogenetic analyses. I describe a novel metric, the miss- ing sequence decisiveness score (MSDS), which assesses the phylogenetic decisiveness of a matrix given the pattern of missing sequence data. In Chapter 2, I introduce a class of phylogenetic models of chromosome number evolution that accommodate both anagenetic and cladogenetic change.
    [Show full text]
  • Known and Potential Vascular Plant Flora of Fort Laramie National Historic Site
    Known and Potential Vascular Plant Flora Of Fort Laramie National Historic Site Compiled by Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming PO Box 3381 Laramie, WY 82071 16 April 2001 INTRODUCTION Prior to the early 1990s, little was known about the composition of the vascular plant flora of Fort Laramie National Historic Site in Goshen County, Wyoming. In 1994, B. Ernie Nelson of the University of Wyoming’s Rocky Mountain Herbarium (RM) visited the Park on several occasions while conducting a general floristic survey of public lands in southeastern Wyoming (Hartman and Nelson 1995). Nelson’s voucher specimens were deposited at the RM and FOLA herbarium. Hollis Marriott and Jim Drake of The Nature Conservancy also compiled a brief list of plant species during their vegetation mapping project in 1997 (The Nature Conservancy 1997). These studies and other historical records were synthesized into a single checklist by Fertig (2000). That list contained 177 plant taxa (Table 1), including 5 plants considered “species of special concern” by the state natural heritage program and 35 non-native species. In March 2001, Vanessa Hill of the National Park Service contracted with the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database (WYNDD) to compile a list of all vascular plant species that potentially occur in Fort Laramie National Historic Site (but which have not been previously documented). The following report contains the results of this study. METHODS To determine which additional species might be present (but undocumented) at Fort Laramie, I conducted a query of WYNDD’s county-level vascular plant species database for Goshen County, Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Back Flowering Plants and Pollinators Through Effective Control of Invasive Winter Annual Grasses with Esplanade® Herbicide
    Bringing back flowering plants and pollinators through effective control of invasive winter annual grasses with Esplanade® herbicide Boulder County Open Space Small Grant Report Submitted by: Dr. Arathi Seshadri, Assistant Professor [email protected] Janet Hardin, Research Associate [email protected] Colorado State University December 6, 2018 Campus Contact: Dr. Arathi Seshadri [email protected] Phone: (970) 491-6804 1170 Campus Delivery, 307 University Avenue Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Boulder County staff sponsor: Steve Sauer [email protected] 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Invasive species pose one of the largest threats to the biodiversity native to a region, including impacting important pollinator species. Currently the state of Colorado’s list of noxious species includes 105 species, 9 of which are grasses. Cheatgrass, or downy brome, is one of the most problematic exotic grass species in the American West, and the most widespread of the Colorado listed species, occurring in every county in the state. Control of invasive grasses has largely depended on grazing, prescribed burning, or use of herbicides such as imazapic, glyphosate and rimsulfuron. However, control is challenged by the dependence of livestock on forage grass species and the nonselective nature of many herbicides. Indaziflam (Esplanade), an herbicide recently approved for use in controlling invasive annual grasses on rangelands and open spaces, shows promise to eliminate or limit spread of those invasive grasses. As invasive species are controlled and eventually eliminated, it is expected that the areas previously occupied by the invasive species will be amenable for growth of flowering forbs and in turn support pollinators that depend on these flora.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 AAIC Annual Meeting: Bringing Industrial Crops Into the Future
    2006 Program Return to Meetings page 2007 AAIC Annual Meeting: Bringing Industrial Crops into the Future October 7-10, 2007 Portland, Maine Program Keynote Speaker Plenary Session General Crops Medicinal and Nutraceuticals Fibers and Cellulosics Oilseeds Natural Rubber and Resins Poster Session (General Crops) Poster Session (Medicinal and Nutraceuticals) Poster Session (Oilseeds) Top of Page ABSTRACTS Keynote Speaker THE ROLE OF INDUSTRIAL CROPS IN A BIOBASED ECONOMY Carol Werner Environmental and Energy Study Institute, Washington, DC, USA In the last 18 months, there has been a sea-change in the attitude of national policymakers regarding climate change, with many Congressional hearings being held and numerous bills being introduced. It has become a mainstream issue – now the question is focused on what policy measures are needed to address this enormous problem. For the past several years, energy security has been in the forefront of national policy discussions, with nearly 300 bills introduced in Congress on various energy issues since January 2007. Last year, more than $300 billion was spent on the import of oil to the United States – and that number is expected to grow. Sixty-eight percent of the oil consumed in the United States is in the transportation sector, a few percent is used in the generation of electricity and for heating oil, and a significant percent is used for the ubiquitous petrochemical feedstocks and products that dominate our lives. Therefore, concerns about oil and, increasingly, climate change – and, of course, rural economic development interests play an important role -- are driving policy changes that have created a major emphasis on the role of biofuels, particularly ethanol and cellulosic ethanol.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Seeding and Seeding Plus Mulching Treatments on Exotic Plant Invasion and Native Plant Recovery Following the 2010 Fo
    Impacts of seeding and seeding plus mulching treatments on exotic plant invasion and native plant recovery following the 2010 Fourmile Canyon Fire, Colorado Paula J. Fornwalt, PhD Research Ecologist USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 Final Report to Boulder County Parks and Open Space 12 February 2012 Fornwalt PJ. 2012. Impacts of seeding and seeding plus mulching treatments Abstract Following the 2010 Fourmile Canyon Fire, 170 ha (422 ac) of moderately and severely burned areas were seeded with a mixture of quick growing grass species to provide exotic plants with competition during the first few postfire years. Additionally, some seeded areas were also mulched for runoff and erosion control. We established a network of unburned (UNBURN), burned only (BURN), burned and seeded (SEED), and burned, seeded, and mulched (SEEDMULCH) plots to (1) quantify seeded grass germination and establishment, (2) assess the impacts of seed and seed plus mulch treatments on exotic plants, and (3) examine if native plant recovery is impacted by seed and seed plus mulch treatments. We found that the seeding treatments, both alone and in combination with mulching, had no impact on exotic plants during the first postfire year, probably because seeded grass and mulch cover were generally low. The native plant community also appears to be largely unaffected by the treatments at this point in time. Our results provide Boulder County Parks and Open Space with scientific data on the effectiveness of postfire seeding and seeding plus mulching treatments at meeting treatment objectives in the first postfire year.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/29n8r0nm Author Freyman, William Allen Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution by William Allen Freyman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology and the Designated Emphasis in Computational and Genomic Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Dr. Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Dr. John P. Huelsenbeck Dr. Brent D. Mishler Dr. Kipling W. Will Fall 2017 Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution Copyright 2017 by William Allen Freyman Abstract Phylogenetic Models Linking Speciation and Extinction to Chromosome and Mating System Evolution by William Allen Freyman Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology and the Designated Emphasis in Computational and Genomic Biology University of California, Berkeley Dr. Bruce G. Baldwin, Chair Key evolutionary transitions have shaped the tree of life by driving the processes of spe- ciation and extinction. This dissertation aims to advance statistical and computational ap- proaches that model the timing and nature of these transitions over evolutionary trees. These methodological developments in phylogenetic comparative biology enable formal, model- based, statistical examinations of the macroevolutionary consequences of trait evolution. Chapter 1 presents computational tools for data mining the large-scale molecular sequence datasets needed for comparative phylogenetic analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Issue of Aquilegia and Conps’ New Workshop Chair, Ronda Koski, Has Done an Excellent Job of Arranging a Number of Interesting Workshops Throughout the State
    Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society Aquilegia 2014 CoNPS Photo Contest Winners WORKSHOPAquilegia Volume 38, No. 4 Fall 2014ISSUE Volume 38, No. 4 Fall 2014 1 CoNPS 2014 Photo Contest - Second and Third Place Cottonwood on the S. Platte River Beehive Cactus Native Plant Landscape 2nd Place Native Plant Category, 2nd Place Skot Latona Clair Postmus Moss Sporophytes Parmelia and Xanthoparmelia Lichens Repurposed Artistic Category, 2nd Place Native Plants & Wildlife Category, 2nd Place Audrey Boag Audrey Boag Frasera speciosa Meadow Old-Man-of-the-Mountain Native Plant Landscape Category, 3rd Place Native Plant Category, 3rd place Loraine Yeatts Skot Latona Asters & Butterfly Native Plants & Wildlife Category, 3rd Place Linda Smith Cover - First Place Winners Upper row L to R: Penstemon hallii - Loraine Yeatts Monarda fistulosa with Hyles lineata - Audrey Boag Lower row L to R: Mountain Mahogany swirls - Skot Latona Saxifraga austromontana- Tom Zeiner 2 Aquilegia Volume 38, No. 4 Fall 2014 Aquilegia: Newsletter of the Colorado Native Plant Society The Colorado Native Plant Society is dedicated to furthering the knowledge, appreciation, and conservation of native plants and habitats of Colorado through education, stewardship, and advocacy. Volume 38 Number 4 Fall 2014 ISSN 2161-7317 (Online) - ISSN 2162-0865 (Print) Inside this issue News & Announcements. .4 CoNPS Photo Contest Winners ....................................................4 Jack and Martha Carter’s Offer of Free Tree & Shrub Books for Schools ..............5 CoNPS Calendar ..................................................................7 Workshops .......................................................................8 Chapter Events ..................................................................12 Articles Reports on the 2014 CoNPS Annual Meeting ....................................15 Conservation Corner: Thoughts on the Sequester and the U.S. Forest Service .....21 Penstemon Robbed...Fly Caught in the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • SE Colorado Inventory Final Report
    Southeastern Colorado Survey of Critical Biological Resources 2007 ii Southeastern Colorado Survey of Critical Biological Resources Prepared for: Colorado Cattleman’s Agricultural Land Trust 8833 Ralston Road Arvada, CO 80002 Great Outdoors Colorado 1600 Broadway, Suite 1650 Denver, CO 80202 Colorado Department of Natural Resources Division of State Board of Land Commissioners 1313 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 Colorado Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife 6060 Broadway Denver, CO 80216 Prepared by: Joe Stevens, John Sovell, Denise Culver, Karin Decker, Lee Grunau, Amy Lavender, Chris Gaughan Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 8002 Campus Mail Fort Collins, CO 80523-8002 (970) 491-1309 email: heritage@ colostate.edu http://www.cnhp.colostate.edu May 2008 Copyright © 2008 Colorado State University Colorado Natural Heritage Program All Rights Reserved Cover photograph: Bruno Canyon in morning light, by Renée Rondeau iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The biological diversity of the shortgrass prairies and juniper rimmed canyons of Southeast Colorado represent a vast and largely intact ecosystem that is not fully understood or documented. While the ranchers that make up the majority of landowners in the area understand much about the character and capabilities of the area, they too are limited in their knowledge of specifics regarding the full range of biological diversity on their lands. Their desire to better understand the natural heritage maintained on their lands, and in the region as a whole, served as the impetus for this study. It is with that objective in mind that the Southeastern Colorado Survey of Critical Biological Resources 2007 was completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of a Geographic Barrier on Adaptation in the Dwarf Sunflower (Helianthus Pumilus Nutt.)
    Int. J. Plant Sci. 175(6):688–701. 2014. Copyright is not claimed for this article. DOI: 10.1086/676305 EFFECT OF A GEOGRAPHIC BARRIER ON ADAPTATION IN THE DWARF SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS PUMILUS NUTT.) Patrick A. Reeves1,* and Christopher M. Richards* *USDA-ARS, National Center for Genetic Resources Preservation, 1111 South Mason Street, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, USA Editor: Pamela Soltis Premise of research. Geographic isolation promotes local adaptation but may also prevent the movement of advantageous gene complexes throughout a species distribution. We identify a geographic barrier that inhibits gene flow and adaptation across the disjunct species range of the Rocky Mountain endemic sunflower Helianthus pumilus. Methodology. Habitat suitability modeling and least-cost path analysis were used to characterize envi- ronmental preferences across the species range and to identify barriers to gene flow. Simple sequence repeat data were used to assess genetic structure and estimate recent levels of gene flow across the distributional disjunction. A common garden was used to study phenotypic differentiation and local adaptation. Controlled crosses tested for intrinsic barriers to reproduction. Pivotal results. Despite significant differences in available habitat, individuals in northern and southern regions occupy similar sites, suggesting limited adaptive differentiation in environmental preference. A region of low-suitability habitat separates the two regions. Northern and southern plants are genetically distinct. There has been little recent gene flow. Southern plants had higher fitness (measured as seed set) in the northern region than northern plants. A suite of morphological characters, present in half of southern plants, conveyed a twofold fitness advantage in the north, but this adaptive phenotype is virtually nonexistent in the northern range.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region
    Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (VERSION 3) NEIL SNOW Herbarium Pacificum Bernice P. Bishop Museum 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, HI 96817 [email protected] Suggested citation: Snow, N. 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region (Version 3). 316 pp. Retrievable from the Colorado Native Plant Society (http://www.conps.org/plant_lists.html). The author retains the rights irrespective of its electronic posting. Please circulate freely. 1 Snow, N. January 2009. Checklist of Vascular Plants of the Southern Rocky Mountain Region. (Version 3). Dedication To all who work on behalf of the conservation of species and ecosystems. Abbreviated Table of Contents Fern Allies and Ferns.........................................................................................................12 Gymnopserms ....................................................................................................................19 Angiosperms ......................................................................................................................21 Amaranthaceae ............................................................................................................23 Apiaceae ......................................................................................................................31 Asteraceae....................................................................................................................38 Boraginaceae ...............................................................................................................98
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Flats Site Vascular Plant Species List (Sorted by Speccode) 1
    Rocky Flats Site Vascular Plant Species List (sorted by speccode) Family Scientific Name Speccode Wetland Scientific Name Wetland Indicator ACERACEAE Acer glabrum Torr. ACGL1 Acer glabrum Torr. FAC ASTERACEAE Achillea millefolium L. ssp. lanulosa (Nutt.) Piper ACMI1 Achillea millefolium L. FACU ACERACEAE Acer negundo L. var. interius (Britt.) Sarg. ACNE1 Acer negundo L. FAC ACERACEAE Acer platanoides L. ACPL1 Acer platanoides L. FACU POACEAE Aegilops cylindrica Host AECY1 Aegilops cylindrica Host xx POACEAE Agropyron caninum (L.) Beauv. ssp. majus (Vasey) C. L. Hitchc. AGCA1 Elymus trachycaulus (Link) Gould ex Shinners FACU POACEAE Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. AGCR1 Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. xx POACEAE Agropyron dasystachyum (Hook.) Scribn. AGDA1 Elymus lanceolatus (Scribn. & J.G. Sm.) Gould ssp. lanceolatus FACU POACEAE Agropyron desertorum (Fisch.) Schult. AGDE1 Agropyron desertorum (Fisch.) Schult. xx POACEAE Agropyron elongatum (Host) Beauv. AGEL1 Agropyron elongatum (Host) Beauv. xx ASTERACEAE Agoseris glauca (Pursh.) Dietr. AGGL1 Agoseris glauca (Pursh.) Dietr. FACU POACEAE Agropyron griffithsii Scribn. & Smith AGGR1 Agropyron griffithsii Scribn. & Smith xx POACEAE Agropyron intermedium (Host) Beauv. AGIN1 Agropyron intermedium (Host) Beauv. xx POACEAE X Agrohordeum macounii (Vasey) Lepage AGMA1 ×Elyhordeum macounii (Vasey) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey FAC POACEAE Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. AGRE1 Elymus repens (L.) Gould FACU POACEAE Agrostis scabra Willd. AGSC1 Agrostis scabra Willd. FAC POACEAE Agropyron smithii Rydb. AGSM1 Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) Á. Löve FACU POACEAE Agropyron spicatum (Pursh) Scribn. and Sm. AGSP1 Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) Á. Löve ssp. spicata xx POACEAE Agrostis stolonifera L. AGST1 Agrostis stolonifera L. FACW ROSACEAE Agrimonia striata Michx. AGST2 Agrimonia striata Michx. FACU BRASSICACEAE Alyssum alyssoides (L.) L. ALAL1 Alyssum alyssoides (L.) L.
    [Show full text]
  • Tim Hogan University of Colorado Museum of Natural History Herbarium, UCB 350 Boulder, Colorado 80309-0350, U.S.A
    A FLORISTIC SURVEY OF THE BOULDER MOUNTAIN PARK: WITH NOTES ON ITS CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT (BOULDER, COLORADO, U.S.A.) Tim Hogan University of Colorado Museum of Natural History Herbarium, UCB 350 Boulder, Colorado 80309-0350, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT The City of Boulder Mountain Park sits in the eastern foothills of the northern Front Range of Colorado. Approximately 7000 acres (2800 ha) in extent, the study area is characterized by a foothills and montane vegetation and flora, predominantly of western North American distribution. Situated at the interface of the Great Plains and the Rocky Mountains, the flora of the Mountain Park is distinguished by a wealth of species with eastern woodland affinities, as well as a number of southern Rocky Mountain species endemic to the Front Range. Six hundred and ninety-eight (698) species of vascular plants in 426 genera and 100 families are documented in this survey. Twenty (20) of the plants are listed as Species of Special Concern by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, with an additional 26 listed as sensitive by the City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks Department (OSMP). Introduced non-native species constitute 21% of the flora (147 species), a figure that exaggerates their ecological role in the Park; less than a dozen introduced species are of serious concern in their impact upon native diversity. The Mountain Park is viewed by many as the crown jewel of the City’s OSMP system, and serves as a model for public land management across other open spaces in urban areas nationwide.
    [Show full text]