<<

The Ecological and Cultural Importance of a at Risk of _I Extinction, Pacific

The cultural and ecological values of ( tridentata) have not t been understood by Euro-Americans and thus their great decline has almost gone IMW unnoticed except by Native Americans, who elevated the issue and initiated research to IAXl1 restore its populations, at least in the Columbia Basin. They regard Pacific lamprey as a -I highly valued resource and as a result ksuyas (lamprey) has become one of their cultural aD 4 icons. Ksuyas are harvested to this day as a subsistence food by various tribes along the Pacific coast and are highly regarded for their cultural value. Interestingly, our review suggests that the Pacific lamprey plays an important role in the food web, may have acted as a buffer for from predators, and may have been an important source of marine nutrients to oligotrophic watersheds. This is very different from the Euro- American perception that lampreys are pests. We suggest that cultural biases affected management policies.

Introduction Corps of Engineers, unpublished data). The state of Oregon listed Pacific lamprey as a sensitive species Lampreys have experienced declines in abundance in 1993 and followed with protected status in 1996 throughout the world due to human disturbances (Kostow 2002). Because Pacific lamprey has signif- (Renaud 1997). Causes of these declines include flow icantly declined along the Oregon coast and in the regulation (Wallace and Ball 1978; Beemish and Basin (Close 2001) in sympatry Northcote 1989), channelization (Kirchhofer 1995), with salmonids, lamprey decline is very likely cor- poor water quality (Myllynen et al. 1997), and chem- related with disturbance. ical treatments (Schuldt and Goold 1980). Flow From a tribal perspective, the decline of lamprey regulation, which is common throughout most of the has had at least three negative effects: (1) loss of United States, impacts adults by impeding passage at culture, (2) loss of fishing opportunities in tradi- dams, while larvae are affected by the dewatering of tional fishing areas, and (3) tribal members must rearing habitat. River channelization negatively travel to a lower Columbia River tributaries to har- impacts larval lamprey habitat by increasing velocity, vest lamprey. For example, many young tribal thereby reducing depositional areas. Furthermore, lar- members do not know how to catch and prepare vae are more susceptible to toxicological effects from lamprey for drying. In addition, young tribal mem- contaminants due to their sedentary life in the ben- bers are losing important myths and legends thos, as demonstrated by chemical treatments in the associated with lamprey. These are symptoms streams to control nonnative (Petromyzon caused by the decline of Pacific lamprey in the inte- marnnus) in the , resulting in declines in rior Columbia River tributaries traditionally fished native lamprey populations. by the basin tribes. Furthermore, interior Columbia Conservation of native lampreys has not been a Basin tribal members must travel long distances fisheries management priority in the United States. away from traditional fishing areas to harvest Even though these primitive share many of the Pacific lamprey in Oregon's . same as salmonids, lampreys have received Attention to the ecological and cultural impor- little attention. Most of the interest in lampreys has tance of Pacific lamprey has been negligible in the been focused on controlling exotic sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes in the United David A. Close, States. It is likely that human disturbances have Martin S. Fitzpatrick, and Hiram W. Li impacted Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) Close is a fisheries biologist in the Tribal Fisheries Program, Department of along the Pacific coast. For example, Pacific lam- Natural Resources, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, prey counts at Winchester Dam located in the Pendleton, Oregon, and is a tribal member in the Confederated Tribes of the coastal Umpqua River, decreased exponentially in Umatilla Indian Reservation. He can be contacted at [email protected]. numbers from a maximum of 46,785 in 1966 to 34 Fitzpatrick is a courtesy associate professor in the Department of Fish and fish in 2001 (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, and is a water quality standards Wildlife, unpublished data). Counts at Ice Harbor coordinator for the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Portland. Dam in the , a tributary of the Hiram W. Li is a courtesy professor in the Department of Fish and Wildlife, Columbia River, decreased from a maximum of Oregon State University and assistant leader in the Oregon Cooperative Fish 49,454 in 1963 to 203 lamprey in 2001 (U.S. Army and Wildlife Research Unit, Oregon State University, Corvallis. July 2002 I www.fisheries.org I Fisheries 19 United States due to the negative perception that depositional areas such as pools and eddies (Pletcher most people have toward lampreys. Many people 1963). The larvae then burrow into the soft sedi- still believe that all lampreys are pests as they asso- ments in the shallow areas along the stream banks r W ciate their ecology with the sea lamprey problem in (Richards 1980). The larval stage has been estimated the Laurentian Great Lakes. However, we argue to range from 4-6 years (Pletcher 1963; Kan 1975; that Pacific lamprey are an important part of the Richards 1980) although it may extend up to 7 years ecosystem and have cultural value to the peoples of (Hammond 1979; Beamish and Northcote 1989). the Pacific Northwest. Larval Pacific lampreys can represent a large por- tion of the biomass in streams where they are Life History abundant, thus making them an important component along with aquatic insects in processing nutrients, Pacific lamprey is distributed in North America nutrient storage, and nutrient cycling (Kan 1975). from the Aleutian Islands south along the Pacific Larval lampreys process nutrients by filter feeding on detritus, coast to Baja California, Mexico, and inland to the diatoms, and suspended above and upper reaches of most rivers draining into the within the substrate (Hammond 1979; Moore and Pacific Ocean (Ruiz-Campos and Gonzalez- Mallatt 1980). Larvae also possess high entrapment Guzman 1996). The present state of knowledge efficiency for food coupled with low food assimilation suggests that the life history of Pacific lamprey is rates. For example, based on studies of other lamprey very similar to sea lamprey. They spend the early species (L. planeri), larval Pacific lamprey may digest part of their life burrowed in fine silt or sand filter- only 30-40% of the food taken in while passing large ing detritus and other particulate matter. After an amounts of undigested food (Moore and Mallatt 1980). extended time (4 to 6 years), larvae go through Larvae facilitate the conversion of the nutrients which includes major morphologi- derived from detritus and algae into stored biomass, while the cal and physiological changes. The juveniles then undigested material is processed into fine particulate matter. The Figure 1. Life cycle of the move to the ocean to feed before returning as adults reduced matter is then Pacific lamprey (credit: for reproduction (Figure 1). exported from the system or taken up by other organ- Jeremy Red Star Wolf). isms such as filter feeding insects (Merritt et al. 1984). Larval Pacific lamprey constitutes a food source for other . There are two periods when lar- vae are subjected to predation: during emergence from nests and during scouring events that dislodge the larvae from their burrows. Pfeiffer and Pletcher (1964) found coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) fry ate emergent larval lampreys. In addition, larvae are commonly used for bait to catch the exotic smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui) in the lower reaches of the John Day River, Oregon (J. Bronson, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Tribal Fisheries Program, pers. comm.).

Downstream migrants

During metamorphosis, the larvae go through morphological and physiological changes to pre- pare for a parasitic lifestyle in salt water. Transformation of Pacific lamprey from the larval to young adult life stage generally occurs during July through November (Pletcher 1963; Hammond 1979; Richards and Beamish 1981). Young adult lampreys begin their migration to the Pacific Ocean in the fall and continue through the Ecological Importance spring. Time of entrance into salt water may differ among populations of Pacific lamprey due to environ- Larval stage mental conditions (R.J. Beamish, Pacific Biological Station, Nanaimo, BC, pers. comm.). Kan (1975) sug- Pacific lamprey exhibits a protracted freshwater gested that coastal populations enter salt water in the juvenile residence in the stream benthos. Larvae, late fall while inland populations enter in the spring. often referred to as ammocoetes, leave the nest In the Nicola River of British Columbia, 99% of all approximately two or three weeks after hatching, metamorphosed lampreys migrated by April and May drift downstream (usually at night), and settle in slow (Beamish and Levings 1991).

20 Fisheries I www.fisheries.org I vol 27 no 7 Young adult lampreys migrating downstream may Adult lampreys may have been an important (A have buffered salmonid juveniles from predation by buffer for upstream migrating adult salmon from pre- Uk ;;r and . Pacific lamprey is found in the diets dation by marine . From the perspective of of northern pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus oregonensis) a predatory sea , lampreys have at least three ID and channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in the main- virtues: they are easier to capture than adult salmon, stem Snake River (Poe et al. 1991). Further, Merrell they have higher caloric value per unit weight than al (1959) found that lampreys comprised 71% by vol- salmonids, and their migration in schools means fer- ume of the diets in California gulls (Larus californicus), tile feeding patches. Pacific lamprey is extraordinarily er. ringbill gulls (Larus delawarensis), western gulls (Larus rich in fats, much richer than salmon. Caloric values C occidentalis), and Fosters tern (Sterna forsteri) in the for lamprey range from 5.92 to 6.34 kcal/g wet weight mainstem Columbia River during early May. This is (Whyte et al. 1993), whereas salmon average 1.26 to q% interesting, in light of the controversy concerning 2.87 kcal/g wet weight (Stewart et al. 1983). In fact, waterbird predation on salmon smolts in the the work of Roffe and Mate (1984) revealed that the ID Columbia River (Collis et al. 2001). most abundant dietary item in seals and sea lions was Historically large numbers of outmigrating lampreys Pacific lamprey. As a result, marine mammal preda- may have reduced predation rates on salmon smolts by tion on salmonids may now be much more severe avian and aquatic predators in the Columbia Basin. because lamprey populations have declined.

Ocean life Spawning migration

The ocean life history stage of Pacific lamprey isnot Beamish (1980) suggested that returning adult lam- well understood, but the duration of ocean residency preys enter freshwater between April and June and may vary. The parasitic-phase has been estimated to complete migration into streams by September. Pacific last for periods of up to 3.5 years for Pacific lamprey in lamprey overwinters in freshwater and spawns the fol- the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia (Beamish lowing spring (Beamish 1980). Pacific lampreys do not Table 1. Prey of adult 1980). Off the coast of Oregon, the duration of the feed during the spawning migration-they utilize Pacific lamprey (Table ocean phase was estimated to range from 20 to 40 stored carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins for energy based from Beamish 1980). months (Kan 1975). Parasitic-phase Pacific lampreys (Read 1968). Beamish have been collected at distances ranging from 10 to (1980) observed a 20% 100 km off the Pacific coast and at depths ranging from shrinkage in body size Name 100 to 800 m (Kan 1975; Beamish 1980). from the time of fresh- sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) The Pacific lamprey preys on a variety of fish water entry to spawning. coho salmon (0. kisutch) species and marine mammals in the Pacific Ocean. Pacific lamprey along pink salmon (0. gorbuscha) Beamish (1980) reported five salmonid and nine the coast of Oregon usu- chinook salmon (0. tshawytscha) other fish species that are known prey of Pacific ally begin to in steelhead trout (0. mykiss) rockfish (Sebastes aleutianus and S. reedi) lamprey (Table 1). In addition, Pacific lamprey has May when water tem- 0 Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus) been reported to feed on finback (Balaenoptera peratures reach 10 C to lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus) physalus), humpback (Megaptera nodosa), sei 15°C and continue to sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria) (Balaenoptera borealis), and sperm (Physeter catodon) spawn through July. In Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) whales (Pike 1951). the Babine River system Greenland turbot (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) Anadromous Pacific lamprey should not be viewed in British Columbia, arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias) as a species like sea lamprey of the Laurentian Pacific lampreys were Kamchatka flounder (A. evermanni) Great Lakes (e.g., Eschmeyer 1955; Moffett 1956; observed spawning from Pacific ocean perch (Sebastes alutus) Coble et al. 1990). In the Great Lakes, an entire com- June through the end of munity of naive prey was exposed to an exotic July (Farlinger and predator. Most lampreys around the world live in equi- Beamish 1984). librium with their hosts (Renaud 1997). Pacific Returning adult Pacific lampreys are an impor- lamprey has co-adapted with its prey, which includes tant part of the food web for many species of Pacific salmon. Beamish (1980) could find no evi- freshwater fishes, birds, and mammals. Spawned out dence that increased lamprey production in the carcasses of lampreys are important dietary items for Skeena River would lead to predation problems on its white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) in the sockeye salmon. Although Pacific lamprey will prey on Columbia and Fraser Rivers (Semakula and Larkin salmonids, lampreys also feed on a variety of midwater 1968; Galbreath 1979). Wolf and Jones (1989) species such as Pacific hake (Merluccius productus) and reported the great blue heron (Ardea herodias) as a walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) in the open predator of spawning adult Pacific lamprey. In addi- ocean (Beamish 1980). The effect of intense commer- tion, mink (Mustela vison) are also noted by cial harvests of Pacific hake, walleye pollock, and Beamish (1980) as a predator of adult lampreys. groundfishes on the food chain dynamics of the north Pacific lamprey has very high fecundity compared Pacific Ocean ecosystem and on Pacific lamprey is not to North American Pacific salmon species. Fecundity well understood, but likely substantial. for Pacific lamprey in Oregon streams ranged from

July 2002 I www.fisheries.org I Fisheries 21 98,000 to 238,400 per female (Kan 1975), while Pacific lamprey also has medicinal value to tribal fecundities for five North American Pacific salmon peoples in the mid-Columbia Plateau. Oil collected species ranged from 1,200 to 17,000 eggs per female from drying lamprey is applied to skin or ailing parts (Burgner 1991; Heard 1991; Salo 1991; Healey 1991; of the body in conjunction with a purifying sweat Sandercock 1991). Relative fecundity in Pacific lam- bath. It was used historically to condition hair and b prey was significantly lower in an interior Columbia to cure ear aches. Lamprey oil is also important in River tributary compared to Oregon coastal streams. the diets of tribal peoples in the mid-Columbia 4) Relative fecundity was 522.15 and 503.44 eggs/g body Plateau. Lampreys continue to be an integral part of 40 wt. in lamprey from the Umpqua and Molalla Rivers, tribal culture in the Pacific Northwest. and 417.94 eggs/g body wt. in the John Day River Pacific lamprey is one of the many subsistence (Kan 1975). Kan (1975) suggested that the lower rel- foods of indigenous peoples in the mid-Columbia ative fecundity in the John Day lampreys was due to Plateau. Lampreys are called ksuyas or asum in the a higher cost of migration. native tongue (Sahaptin) of the mid-Columbia Pacific lamprey spawning success and production of Plateau tribes. However, many people use the com- larvae are not well understood. However, sea lampreys mon name "" when referencing Pacific lamprey. in the Great Lakes were estimated to only deposit 14% Lamprey is often harvested by hand, dip net, or jig- of their eggs in nests. The survival of sea lamprey eggs ging with a long pole and hook (Figure 2). Fishing deposited in the nests was estimated to be up to 90% for lamprey is usually done at night when the fish are (Manion and Hanson 1980). During Pacific lamprey most active. Generally fishing sites are located at spawning, eggs have been observed to overflow the falls or fast water areas that cause the lamprey to con- nests and were actively eaten by rainbow trout (O. gregate prior to spawning. Before the dams turned mykiss) and speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus) in the the Columbia River into a series of lakes, many tribal Umatilla River, Oregon (J. Bronson, Confederated peoples fished falls and rapids for lamprey. The fish Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Tribal were then prepared traditionally by drying or roast- Fisheries Program, pers. comm.). After spawning, ing (Figure 3). Lamprey continue to be part of the Pacific lamprey die within 3 to 36 days (Mattson 1949; Columbia River tribal culture and are as important Pletcher 1963; Kan 1975). Adult carcasses are likely a in ceremonies and celebrations as many other foods major contributor of nutrients in oligotrophic streams collected during seasonal harvests (Figure 4). (Wilpfli et al. 1998; Fisher Wold and Hershey 1999). Euro-Americans Cultural Significance The early fur trappers in the Pacific Northwest of Native Americans the United States used Pacific lamprey as food. In 1812, Robert Stuart led members of the Astor party Pacific lamprey isone of the many religious foods of on a voyage up the Columbia River. In July of 1812, the indigenous peoples in the mid-Columbia River Stuart and his party traded with the Umatilla Tribe for Plateau. In the traditional mid-Columbia Plateau lamprey. In Robert Stuart's narratives, he wrote, tribal worldview, animals, plants, water, rocks, etc. are "Saturday 25th This day we found intolerably hot, and believed to have a shukwat (spirit) and a conscience. after coming 15 miles stopped at an Indian Village This worldview promotes respect for all things in where traded 4 horses having in the course of our and is interwoven into the Sahaptin culture by [today's] journey procured 5 others- Here we got some myths and legends. These typically reinforce the Lamper , which with a Kind of Chub seem pecu- tamanwit (sacred law) of how humans are supposed to liar to these waters above the Falls- Stayed here the live with our brothers and sisters of the natural world. 26th" (Stuart 1812). In the early 1900s, fur trappers When individuals abuse tamanwit, it is believed that utilized Pacific lamprey as bait to catch coyotes (Canis the shukwat of that being will go against that individ- latrans) in the Pacific Northwest (Mattson 1949). ual, making life difficult. Therefore it is in the best Adult Pacific lamprey was important in the devel- interest of the individual to respect nature. In addition, opment of fish culture in the Pacific Northwest. In the the shukwat can be very helpful to an individual. The late 1800s, fish culturists in Oregon began developing belief is that an individual can attain a shukwat of artificial propagation of salmonids. Fish culturists soon some being to increase one's power. This type of shuk- discovered a need to hold fish longer and to increase wat is considered a spirit helper, which an individual growth while doing so. The need to find a large and can call upon for strength in times of need. There are cheap food supply to accomplish the task led fish cul- many songs that are specific for different animals, turists to experiment with different foodstuffs, plants, or other beings to help that person pay respect including ground raw Pacific lamprey, which was to the beings before and sometimes after their harvest. found to be a premium feed for young salmon. Adult In addition, the beings are believed to give themselves lampreys were collected at Willamette Falls, Oregon, up to the humans for subsistence or use in daily life. and then transferred to cold storage to be processed However, mid-Columbia Plateau tribal culture places (Figure 5). During the year 1913, 24.5 metric tons humans at the same level with the other beings. were harvested for this purpose (Clanton 1913). In

22 Fisheries I www.fisheries.org I vol 27 no 7 Figure 2. Nez Perce tribal member zz James Williams from Lapwai, Idaho, dip oo _ netting Pacific lamprey in the Clearwater River, circa 1920. >, rn

Figure 3. Umatilla tribal members W C drying Pacific lamprey near the Umatilla River, Oregon, 1903. M S WC 8F owo o

cO m

0z~©> Figure 4. Umatilla tribal member Inez Reeves preparing Pacific lamprey for drying, 1999.

S C

Zr

cn

=o

Figure 5. C Pacific lamprey (13.6 C zC metric tons) aboard a 7 scow for delivery to a cold storage plant to be Zr preserved as food for H hatchery salmon fry, 1913. z H C 3:: z C fD C 1a

July 2002 I www.fisheries.org I Fisheries 23 the following years, lampreys became com- Acknowledgments Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata). mercially important. A commercial fishery Canadian Joumal of Fisheries and Aquatic for Pacific lamprey at Willamette Falls We thank Ken Currens, Mary Moser, and Sciences 41:278-85. Fisher Wold, A. K., and A. E. Hershey. 1999. started in 1941. Between 1943 and 1949 a Christian Torgersen for their comments and Effects of salmon constructive reviews on the manuscript. This carcass decomposition on total of 740,419 kilograms of lamprey were biofilm growth and work was supported by a grant from wood decomposition. harvested. The primary use of the fish was Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Bonneville Power Administration to the for vitamin oil, protein food for livestock, Sciences 56:767-773. Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Galbreath, J. 1979. Columbia River colossus, poultry, and fishmeal (Mattson 1949). Reservation for the Pacific Lamprey the white sturgeon. Oregon Wildlife, March. Presently, Pacific lamprey are important for Research and Restoration Project. Hammond, R. J. 1979. Larval biology of the scientific research (medicinal anticoagu- · · Pacific lamprey, tridentatus lants), for teaching specimens (North (Gairdner), of the Potlatch River, Idaho. Carolina Biological Supply House regularly References M.S. thesis. University of Idaho, Moscow. collects at Willamette Falls), and for food Healy, M. C. 1991. Life history of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pages (in 1994, approximately 1,816 kg were Beamish, R. J. 1980. Adult biology of the river 313-393 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, eds. exported to Europe). lamprey (Lampetra ayersi) and the Pacific Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) from the Vancouver, British Columbia. Pacific coast of Canada. Conclusion Canadian Journal of Heard, W. R. 1991. Life history of pink salmon Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:1906- (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha). Pages 121-230 in 1923. Pacific lamprey is an important compo- C. Groot and L. Margolis, eds. Pacific salmon Beamish, R. J., and C. D. Levings. 1991. life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, British nent to the ecosystem both as a predator Abundance and freshwater migrations of the Columbia. and prey. As a predator, Pacific lamprey has anadromous parasitic lamprey, Lainpetra Kan, T. T. 1975. Systematics, variation, coevolved with native fish assemblages in tridentata, in a tributary of the Fraser River, distribution, and biology of lampreys of the the Pacific Ocean and freshwater ecosys- British Columbia. Canadian Journal of genus Lamperra in Oregon. Doctoral Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:1250- dissertation, Oregon State University, tems. Pacific lamprey preys upon a variety 1263. of fishes and mammals in the Pacific Corvallis. Beamish, R. J., and T. G. Northcote. 1989. Kirchhofer, A. 1995. Concept of conservation Ocean. As prey, lamprey is important to Extinction of a population of anadromous for the European (Lampetra many species of fish, birds, and mammals parasitic lamprey, Lampetra tridentata, planeri) in Switzerland. Fishchokologie 8:93- (including humans). Like other anadro- upstream of an impassable dam. Canadian 108 mous fish species, they transport nutrients Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Kostow, K. 2002. Oregon lampreys: natural from the ocean to the freshwater environ- 46:420-425. history, status, and analysis of management Burgner, R. L. 1991. Life history of sockeye ment. The decline of lamprey abundance issues. Oregon Department of Fish and salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Pages 3-117 in Wildlife, Portland. has probably had a myriad of effects on the C. Groot and L. Margolis, eds. Pacific salmon Manion, P. J., and L. H. Hanson. 1980. trophic relationships within the freshwater life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, British Spawning behavior and fecundity of and Pacific Ocean ecosystems. Columbia. lampreys from the upper three Great Lakes. The cultural values of Pacific lamprey Clanton, R. E. 1913. Feeding fry in ponds. Pages Canadian Joumal of Fisheries and Aquatic are recognized through a short history of 98-100 in R. E. Clanton ed. Biennial report Sciences 37:1635-1640. of the Department of Fisheries of the State of utilization by early Euro-Americans and a Mattson, C. R. 1949. The lamprey fishery at Oregon. To the Twenty-seventh Legislative Willamette Falls, Oregon. Fish Commission long history of use by Native Americans in Assembly Regular Session. Salem, Oregon. of Oregon Research Briefs 2(2):23-27. the Columbia River Basin that continues to Close, D. A. 2001. Effects of acute stress and Merrell, T. R. 1959. Gull food habits on the this day. However, because Euro-American tagging on the swimming performance and Columbia River. Fish Commission of Oregon society places little value on Pacific lam- physiology of Pacific lampreys (Lampetra Research Briefs 7(1):82. prey, ecologically or culturally, this species tridentata). Masters thesis, Oregon State Merritt, R. W., K. W. Cummins, and T. M. was largely ignored by federal, state, and University, Corvallis. Burton. 1984. The role of aquatic insects in Coble, D. W., R, E. Bruesewitz, T. W. Fratt, the processing and cycling of nutrients. Pages land-use management agencies. The federal and J. W. Scheirer. 1990. , sea 134-163 in V H. Resh and D. M. Rosenberg, government has trust obligations with lampreys, and overfishing in the upper Great eds. The ecology of aquatic insects. Praeger regards to treaty tribes fishing rights, which Lakes: a review and reanalysis. Transactions Publishers, . have not been met with regards to many of the American Fisheries Society Moffett, J. W. 1956. Recent changes in the fish species including Pacific lamprey. 119:985-995. deep-water fish populations of Lake Conservation of this species is crucial Collis, K., D. D. Roby, D. P. Craig, B. A. Ryan, Michigan. Transactions of the American to the integrity of the Pacific coast and and R. D. Ledgerwood. 2001. Colonial Fisheries Society 86:393-408. waterbird predation on juvenile salmonids Moore, J. W., and J. M. Mallatt. 1980. Feeding Pacific Ocean ecosystems. The first step is tagged with passive integrated transponders of larval lamprey. Canadian Journal of the recognition that the Pacific lamprey is in the Columbia River Estuary: vulnerability Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:1658- important and there is a need for conser- of different salmonid species, stocks and 1664. vation. Gaining a greater understanding rearing types. Transactions of the American Myllynen, K., E. Ojutkangas, and M. about the problems that the Pacific lam- Fisheries Society 130:385-396. Nikinmaa. 1997. River water with high iron prey is experiencing and its biology is the Eschmeyer, P. H. 1955. The near extinction of concentration and low pH causes mortality lake trout in Lake Michigan. Transactions of of lamprey roe and newly hatched larvae. second step that should follow. Ultimately, the American Fisheries Society 85:102-19. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety there is a need to change the management Farlinger, S. P., and R. J. Beamish. 1984. 36:43-48. emphasis towards the conservation of Recent colonization of a major salmon- Pfeiffer, W., and T. E Pletcher. 1964. Club cells Pacific lamprey. } producing lake in British Columbia by the and granular cells in the skin of lampreys.

24 Fisheries I www.fisheries.org I vol 27 no 7 Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Roffe, T. J., and B. R. Mate. 1984. Abundances for lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush: Canada 21:1083-1088. and feeding habits of pinnipeds in the Rogue application to the Lake Michigan Pike, G. C. 1951. Lamprey marks on whales. River, Oregon. Journal of Wildlife population. Canadian Journal of Fisheries Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Management 48(4):1262-1274. and Aquatic Sciences 40:681-698. Canada 8(4):275-280. Ruiz-Campos, G., and S. Gonzalez-Guzman. Stuart, R. 1812. By canoe up the Columbia Pletcher, T. F. 1963. The life history and 1996. First freshwater record of Pacific from the Klickitat River to the of the distribution of lampreys in the Salmon and lamprey, Lampetra tridentata, from Baja Walla Walla River. Pages 51-74 in P A. certain other rivers in British Columbia, California, Mexico. California Fish and Rollins, ed. The discovery Canada. M. S. thesis. University of British Game 82:144-146. of the Oregon Columbia, Vancouver. Salo, E. 0. 1991. Life history of chum salmon Trail: Robert Stuart's narratives of his Poe, T. P., H. C. Hansel, S. Vigg, D. E. Palmer, (Oncorhynchus keta). Pages 233-309 in C. overland trip eastward from Astoria in 1812- and L. A. Prendergast. 1991. Feeding of Groot and L. Margolis, eds. Pacific salmon 13. Edward Eberstadt and Sons, New York. predaceous fishes on out-migrating juvenile life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, British Wallace, R. L., and K. W. Ball 1978. salmonids in John Day Reservoir, Columbia Columbia. Landlocked parasitic Pacific lamprey in River. Transactions of the American Sandercock, E K. 1991. Life history of coho Dworshak Reservoir, Idaho. Copeia 3:545- Fisheries Society 120:405-420. salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Pages 397- 546. Read, L. J. 1968. A study of ammonia and urea 445 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, eds. Pacific Whyte, J. N. C., R. J. Beamish, N. G. Ginther, production and excretion in the fresh-water- salmon life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, and C. E. Neville. 1993. Nutritional adapted form of the Pacific lamprey, British Columbia. condition of the Pacific lamprey (Lampetra Entosphenus tridentatus. Comparative Schuldt, R. J., and R. Goold. 1980. Changes in tridentata) deprived of food for periods of up Biochemistry and Physiology 26:455-466. the distribution of native lampreys in Lake to two years. Canadian Journal of Fisheries Renaud, C. B. 1997. Conservation status of Superior tributaries in response to sea and Aquatic Sciences 50:591-599. northern hemisphere lampreys lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) control, 1953- Wipfli, M. S., J. Hudson, and J. Caouette. (Petromyzontidae). Journal of Applied 77. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and 1998. Influence of salmon carcasses Ichthyology 13:143-148. Aquatic Sciences 37:1872-1885. on Richards, J. E. 1980. Freshwater life history of Semakula, S. N., and P. A. Larken. 1968. Age, stream productivity: response of biofilm and the anadromous Pacific lamprey Lampetra growth, food, and yield of the white sturgeon benthic macroinvertebrates in southeastern tridentata. M.S. thesis. University of Guelph, (Acipenser transmontanus), of the Fraser Alaska, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Guelph. River, British Columbia. Journal of the Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1503- Richards, J. E., and E W. H. Beamish. 1981. Fisheries Research Board of Canada 1511. Initiation of feeding and salinity tolerance in 25(12):2589-2602. Wolf, B.O., and S.L. Jones. 1989. Great blue the Pacific lamprey Lampetra tridentata. Stewart, D. J., D. Weininger, D. V. Rottiers heron deaths caused by predation on Pacific Marine Biology 63:73-77. and T. A. Edsall. 1983. An energetics model lamprey. The Condor 91:482-484.

July 2002 I www.fisheries.org I Fisheries 25