DOCSLIB.ORG

Private Members' Bill Ballot the Ballot for Private Members' Bill for the 2014-15 Session Will Be Drawn on Thursday June 12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Private Members' Bill Ballot the Ballot for Private Members' Bill for the 2014-15 Session Will Be Drawn on Thursday June 12 Private members’ Bill ballot The ballot for private members’ Bill for the 2014-15 session will be drawn on Thursday June 12 2014. This guide provides insight into how members’ drawn in the ballot decide the subject of their Bill, the legislative process for ballots Bills and their relative success in gaining royal assent in comparison to other types of PMBs (ten minute rule motion and ordinary presentation). Contents Private members’ Bill ballot .................................................................................................................... 2 The ballot ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Bill subjects ......................................................................................................................................... 2 Drafting assistance ............................................................................................................................. 3 Legislative process .............................................................................................................................. 3 How successful are ballot Bills in comparison to ten minute rule and presentation Bills?................ 4 Key points ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Glossary ................................................................................................................................................... 5 May 2014 Private members’ Bill ballot Thirteen Friday sittings are set aside in the House of Commons each session for the consideration of private members’ Bills (approximately 65 hours). Private members’ Bills can be introduced by (i) ballot; (ii) ten minute rule motion; or (iii) ordinary presentation. Priority for the use of the thirteen sitting Friday’s is given to PMBs introduced by the ballot. Ballot Bills therefore have the best chance of becoming law, or being debated on the floor of the House. The ballot The private members’ Bill ballot is drawn on the second Thursday of each session. On the two preceding days members wishing to enter the ballot must add their names against a number in the ballot book placed in the No lobby. Members can only add one name to the book – either their own or that of another member who has authorised them to do so. Over 400 members enter the ballot each session. On the day of the draw, tickets corresponding to the numbers which members have signed their names against are placed in a box. 20 numbers are picked out by the chairman of ways and means. The list of members’ successful in the ballot (and the order which they were drawn) is placed initially in the No lobby and then in the Vote Office. Bill subjects Some members will choose to bring in a Bill on a controversial issue they feel strongly about. However with the chances of being drawn in the ballot so low (approximately 1:20), a substantial majority of members have no particular subject in mind. Around half of the MPs successful in the ballot will be contacted by the government to introduce a handout Bill. These are usually Bills the government has not been able to find time for in their legislative programme, or do not wish to introduce themselves. Handout Bills are by no means offered exclusively to their own backbenchers, but current trends indicate the majority of handout Bills introduced do come from the government backbenches. For instance in the 2012-13 session, 11 Conservative MPs were successful in the ballot. Out of those 11, 10 introduced handout Bills: Order selected in Conservative MP Title of handout Bill ballot 2. Richard Ottaway Scrap Metal Dealers Bill 4. Gavin Barwell Mental Health (Discrimination) (No. 2) Bill 5. Peter Aldous Mobile Homes Bill 7. Neil Carmichael Antarctic Bill 8. Paul Beresford Prisons (Interference with Wireless Telegraphy) Bill 9. Richard Harrington Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Bill 11. Stuart Andrew Prisons (Property) Bill 12. Sheryll Murray Marine Navigation (No. 2) Bill 14. John Glen Presumption of Death Bill 17. Simon Kirby Disabled Persons' Parking Badges Bill Douglas Carswell, who was drawn 20th in the ballot, was the only Conservative MP not to introduce a handout Bill. His bill sought to repeal the European Communities Act 1972 and related legislation. The remaining opposition MPs will receive a large number of approaches from individuals and organisations with suggestions of legislation they should bring forward. The only rule that MPs must abide by when introducing a PMB is that their Bill must not create a “charge upon the people” (a new tax, a tax increase or a similar kind of charge) or a “charge upon the public purse” (the establishment of a new cause for public expenditure). Drafting assistance The first 10 members selected in the ballot can claim no more than £200 towards the cost of drafting assistance for their Bill, however this rarely happens. Drafting assistance can be given by the Public Bill Office or by the organisation/individual whose Bill approach has been taken forward as a private members’ Bill. Legislative process In order to achieve Royal Assent, a private members’ Bill is required to follow and complete the same parliamentary stages afforded to all public Bills. However, there are a number of significant procedural differences between PMBs and government Bills. On the fifth Wednesday of each session, all 20 MPs successful in the ballot formally present their Bills by lining up behind the speaker’s chair and handing their dummy Bills (a card showing the short and long title of the proposed PMB) to the clerk at the table. Each MP will then choose one of the allotted private members’ Bill Fridays for their second reading. In practice, the first seven Fridays are usually allocated as second reading days and the final eight days are reserved for the “remaining stages”. MPs can postpone their allocated second reading day but may not bring their second reading forward to an earlier day. At the beginning of each Friday PMB sitting, a motion is moved calling for the House to sit. A quorum of 40 is required for the motion to be passed, as such, if less than 40 MPs vote the Bill is deferred to the next allocated day, in effect spelling the end of that Bill’s chances. In practice, only the first Bill on the order paper of the allotted Friday is guaranteed debate due to the fact that, unlike government Bills, private members’ Bills are not timetabled. If the debate on the first Bill ends before 2.30pm, subsequent Bills may get a chance of debate, but after 2.30pm only unopposed Bills can make progress. If a Bill is objected to, the member can seek another Friday for consideration of the Bill but this usually signals the end of the PMB due to the lack of parliamentary time. The vast majority of Bills will be opposed either by the government, or if it is a hand-out Bill, by the opposition. In order to stop Bills lower down the order paper from being debated, MPs can ‘talk out’ the first Bill to ensure that debate on subsequent Bills cannot be reached. The speaker has the power to place time limits on speeches, but this rarely happens. If debate on a Bill continues until 2:30pm without May 2014 interruption, that debate automatically ends and the member must find another Friday to resume progress of the Bill because rescheduling in effect spells the end of a PMB. Supporters of the Bill will try to move a closure motion as the 2.30pm deadline nears calling for the second reading question to be put to the House. The speaker will reject a closure motion if they think there has been insufficient debate. If a closure motion is successful then the Bill moves to committee stage. This requires 100 MPs to vote in favour of the motion. This is especially difficult given the fact that most MPs will return to their constituencies on Thursday evenings. If a PMB successfully receives its committee stage it will be sent to a public Bill committee. It is up to the supporting member to find MPs to sit on the committee. Under current arrangements only one public Bill committee for a PMB can be active at any one time. Therefore, if a number of PMBs have had second readings at the same time, substantial delays can occur. At the moment there is no mechanism to call for public evidence during a PMB public Bill committee. PMBs that are lucky enough to reach report stage usually fail here as ‘talking-out’ can be achieved by tabling just a couple of amendments. If a PMB reaches the Lords, it must be sponsored by a backbench peer. The Bill will be automatically given a first reading without any action by the sponsoring peer. Second readings are often a formality, but members of the House who take up Commons Bills should be prepared for amendments. How successful are ballot Bills in comparison to ten minute rule and presentation Bills? PMBs rarely make legislative progress or reach the statute book. Ballot Bills achieve the most legislative success but compared to government Bills, the numbers are low and a significant number of the successful ballot Bills are government ‘handouts’. For instance, of the 133 PMBs introduced in the House of Commons in the 2012-13 session, only 10 achieved royal assent. All were ballot Bills and all were handout Bills introduced by Conservative MPs (see tabled above for list of Bills) 2013- 14 session Type of PMB No. introduced No. received royal assent Ballot Bills 20 4 Ten minute rule Bills 60 0 Presentation Bills 66 1 Lord’s private members’ Bills 31 0 Percentage of ballot Bills which have received royal assent Session Number of ballot Bills achieving Royal Assent 2013-14 4 (20%) 2012-13 10 (50%) 2010-12 6 (30%) 2009-10 5 (28%) 2008-09 2 (10%) 2007-08 3 (15%) 2006-07 3 (15%) 2005-06 3 (15%) Presentation and ten minute rule Bills rarely make it beyond their second reading. In the last ten years there has been a combined total of 802 presentation and ten minute rule Bills. Of that only three have reached Royal Assent, the most recent of which was the Leasehold Reform (Amendment) Act 2014.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hong Kong British National (Overseas) Visa 4
    BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP 8939, 5 May 2021 Hong Kong British By Melanie Gower National (Overseas) visa Esme Kirk-Wade Contents: 1. Background to British National (Overseas) status 2. Calls to extend BN(O) immigration and citizenship rights 3. The new Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa 4. The BN(O) visa: topical issues www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | papers@parliament.uk | @commonslibrary 2 Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa Contents Summary 3 1. Background to British National (Overseas) status 5 1.1 Acquiring BN(O) status: legislation 5 1.2 Immigration and citizenship rights historically conferred by BN(O) status 6 2. Calls to extend BN(O) immigration and citizenship rights 10 2.1 Until May 2020 10 2.2 Summer 2020: Announcement of a new visa route for BN(O)s 11 2.3 Ten Minute Rule Bill: Hong Kong Bill 2019-21 13 3. The new Hong Kong British National (Overseas) visa 14 3.1 Policy, legislation and guidance 14 3.2 Practical details 14 3.3 More generous terms than other visa categories? 18 4. The BN(O) visa: topical issues 19 4.1 How many people might come to the UK? 19 4.2 Integration support and managing the impact on local areas 19 4.3 The gaps in the UK’s offer 21 4.4 What are other countries doing? 21 Cover page image copyright Attribution: Chinese demonstrators, 2019– 20 Hong Kong protests by Studio Incendo – Wikimedia Commons page. Licensed by Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) / image cropped.
    [Show full text]
  • Order Paper for Tue 19 Jan 2021
    Tuesday 19 January 2021 Order Paper No.161: Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Afterwards Oral Questions: Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs 12.30pm Urgent Questions, including on: Visa arrangements for UK musicians in the European Union (Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport) Afterwards Ministerial Statements (if any) Up to 20 Ten Minute Rule Motion: minutes Freedom of Speech (Universities) (Mr David Davis) No debate Trade Bill: Programme (No. 2) (Motion) 2 Tuesday 19 January 2021 OP No.161: Part 1 Up to four Trade Bill: Consideration of Lords hours* Amendments *(if the Trade Bill: Programme (No. 2) (Motion) is agreed to) Until any Business of the House (High hour** Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill) (Motion) **(if the 7.00pm Business of the House Motion is agreed to) Up to one High Speed Rail (West Midlands hour from - Crewe) Bill: Consideration of commencement Lords Amendments of proceedings ***(if the Business of the House on the Business (High Speed Rail (West Midlands - of the House Crewe) Bill) (Motion) is agreed to) (High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill)*** No debate Presentation of Public Petitions Until 7.30pm or Adjournment Debate: Animal for half an hour charities and the covid-19 outbreak (Sir David Amess) Tuesday 19 January 2021 OP No.161: Part 1 3 CONTENTS CONTENTS PART 1: BUSINESS TODAY 4 Chamber 11 Written Statements 13 Committees Meeting Today 22 Committee Reports Published Today 23 Announcements 28 Further Information PART 2: FUTURE BUSINESS 32 A. Calendar of Business Notes: Item marked [R] indicates that a member has declared a relevant interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Abortion Sundari Anitha and Ai
    Making politics visible: Discourses on gender and race in the problematisation of sex- selective abortion Sundari Anitha and Aisha Gill Accepted for publication in Feminist Review Abstract This paper examines the problematisation of sex-selective abortion (SSA) in UK parliamentary debates on Fiona Bruce’s Abortion (Sex-Selection) Bill 2014-15 and on the subsequent proposed amendment to the Serious Crime Bill 2014. On the basis of close textual analysis, we argue that a discursive framing of SSA as a form of cultural oppression of minority women in need of protection underpinned Bruce’s Bill; in contrast, by highlighting issues more commonly articulated in defence of women’s abortion rights, the second set of debates displaced this framing in favour of a broader understanding, drawing on post-colonial feminist critiques, of how socio-economic factors constrain all women in this regard. We argue that the problematisation of SSA explains the original cross-party support for, and subsequent defeat of, the policies proposed to restrict SSA. Our analysis also highlights the central role of ideology in the policy process, thus making politics visible in policy-making. Keywords South Asian women, sex-selective abortion, post-colonial feminism; policy analysis; Serious Crime Bill; Fiona Bruce Introduction In 2012, the Daily Telegraph reported that two doctors working in a private medical practice were prepared to authorise an undercover journalist’s request for an abortion based on the sex of the foetus (Watt et al., 2012). Although transcripts of these conversations revealed that sex had been mentioned in relation to a genetic disorder – which can be sex-specific – in one case, the article omitted this significant detail.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on TRAVEL the Westminster Seminar, London 21
    QUEENSLAND BRANCH COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION (QUEENSLAND BRANCH) REPORT ON TRAVEL The Westminster Seminar, London 21-25 November 2016 Introduction The annual Westminster Seminar is CPA UK’s flagship capacity-building programme for parliamentarians and procedural and committee Clerks from across the Commonwealth. Every year the five-day programme provides a unique platform for its participants to meet their counterparts and explore parliamentary democracy, practice and procedure within a Westminster framework, and share experiences and challenges faced in their parliamentary work. This year the programme will facilitate rigorous discussions on the continuing evolution of best practice within a Westminster-style framework, as adapted across the Commonwealth. Persons attending The following persons attended from the Queensland Branch: • Ms Di Farmer MP, Deputy Speaker, Queensland Parliament • Mr N Laurie, Clerk of the Parliament and Honorary Secretary Queensland Branch The CPA activity undertaken and program Formal workshops, plenary sessions and tours were held between 21 and 25 November 2016. Detailed below is a description of each session. We acknowledge the use of daily summaries provided by the UK CPA secretariat in the compilation of the information in the descriptions below. Westminster Seminar 2016: Day 1 The seminar was formally opened by the Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Ways and Means, Rt Hon. Lindsay Hoyle MP. In his opening he stressed the importance of the seminar in bringing together parliamentarians and clerks from across the Commonwealth, and praised the work of CPA UK. An overview of the breadth of this year's participants was clear, as delegates then introduced themselves, saying where they were from and their role.
    [Show full text]
  • PARLIAMENTARY BRIEFING Wild Animals in Circuses Wednesday 3 September 2014 Ten Minute Rule Motion
    PARLIAMENTARY BRIEFING Wild Animals in Circuses Wednesday 3 September 2014 Ten Minute Rule Motion: Jim Fitzpatrick MP That leave be given to bring in a Bill to prohibit the use of wild animals in circuses; and for connected purposes. This briefing is provided by OneKind to give a Scottish perspective on the above Motion in the name of Jim Fitzpatrick, which we hope will receive support from all parties. OneKind, formerly Advocates for Animals, is an animal protection charity based in Edinburgh and with supporters throughout the UK. We have a long record of opposing the use of wild animals in circuses. In recent years we have reported on breaches of licence and leasing conditions by the wild animal circus that toured Scotland up to 2012, and helped to secure local authority policies to prohibit the letting of council land to circuses with animals. With no animal circuses based in Scotland and now no tours by wild animal circuses (although domestic animal circuses do still visit), it may be thought that the current debate is exclusively an English issue. OneKind believes, however, that it is essential that the administrations proceed together to ensure that Scotland does not provide a refuge for wild animal circuses once they are banned in England. Organisations and citizens from England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have joined the call for action at Westminster. DEFRA has offered to include other administrations in its proposed Bill to ban wild animals in circuses, and OneKind considers this a sensible and pragmatic approach which we have urged the Scottish Government to accept.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) LCM Published in Scotland by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body
    Published 25 April 2018 SP Paper 307 2nd Report, 2018 (Session 5) Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Relations Committee Comataidh Turasachd, Eòrpach agus Dàimhean Taobh a- muigh Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) LCM Published in Scotland by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. All documents are available on the Scottish For information on the Scottish Parliament contact Parliament website at: Public Information on: http://www.parliament.scot/abouttheparliament/ Telephone: 0131 348 5000 91279.aspx Textphone: 0800 092 7100 Email: sp.info@parliament.scot © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliament Corporate Body The Scottish Parliament's copyright policy can be found on the website — www.parliament.scot Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Relations Committee Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) LCM, 2nd Report, 2018 (Session 5) Contents Background ____________________________________________________________1 Committee scrutiny______________________________________________________2 Conclusions and recommendations ________________________________________3 Annexe A ______________________________________________________________4 Minutes of meeting______________________________________________________4 Official report __________________________________________________________4 Written evidence _______________________________________________________4 Draft motion ___________________________________________________________4 Culture, Tourism, Europe and External Relations Committee Holocaust (Return
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Senate Democratic Conference
    MINUTES OF THE SENATE DEMOCRATIC CONFERENCE 1903±1964 MINUTES OF THE SENATE DEMOCRATIC CONFERENCE Fifty-eighth Congress through Eighty-eighth Congress 1903±1964 Edited by Donald A. Ritchie U.S. Senate Historical Office Prepared under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 105th Congress S. Doc. 105±20 U.S. Government Printing Office Washington: 1998 Cover illustration: The Senate Caucus Room, where the Democratic Conference often met early in the twentieth century. Senate Historical Office. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Senate Democratic Conference (U.S.) Minutes of the Senate Democratic Conference : Fifty-eighth Congress through Eighty-eighth Congress, 1903±1964 / edited by Donald A. Ritchie ; prepared under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. United States. Congress. SenateÐHistoryÐ20th centuryÐSources. 2. Democratic Party (U.S.)ÐHistoryÐ20th centuryÐSources. I. Ritchie, Donald A., 1945± . II. United States. Congress. Senate. Office of the Secretary. III. Title. JK1161.S445 1999 328.73'07657Ðdc21 98±42670 CIP iv CONTENTS Foreword ...................................................................................... xiii Preface .......................................................................................... xv Introduction ................................................................................. xvii 58th Congress (1903±1905) March 16, 1903 ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Order Paper for Tue 22 Jan 2019
    Tuesday 22 January 2019 Order Paper No.236: Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Afterwards Oral Questions: Foreign and Commonwealth Office 12.30pm Urgent Questions, Ministerial Statements (if any) Up to 20 minutes Ten Minute Rule Motion: Green Deal (Conduct of Home Energy and Lifestyle Management Ltd) (Alan Brown) No debate Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill: Programme (No. 3) (Motion) Until 7.00pm* Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill: Consideration of Lords Amendments (*if the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Bill: Programme (No.3) Motion is agreed to) No debate Statutory Instruments (Motions for approval) No debate Presentation of Public Petitions Until 7.30pm or for Adjournment Debate: Funding of pupil referral units (Chris half an hour Green) WESTMINSTER HALL 9.30am Future of the water industry in England and Wales 11.00am Cashless transactions (The sitting will be suspended from 11.30am to 2.30pm.) 2.30pm Mental health and the benefits assessment process 4.00pm Future of Wembley Stadium and the funding of grass roots football 4.30pm Freehold estate fees 2 Tuesday 22 January 2019 OP No.236: Part 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS PART 1: BUSINESS TODAY 3 Chamber 9 Westminster Hall 10 Written Statements 11 Committees meeting today 15 Committee reports published today 16 Announcements 18 Further Information PART 2: FUTURE BUSINESS 20 A. Calendar of Business 28 B. Remaining Orders and Notices Notes: Item marked [R] indicates that a member has declared a relevant interest. Tuesday 22 January 2019 OP No.236: Part 1 BUSINESS TOday: CHAMBER 3 BUSINESS TODAY: CHAMBER 11.30pm Prayers Followed by QUESTIONS Oral Questions to the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs 1 Stephen Timms (East Ham) What recent assessment he has made of the safety and security of human rights defenders throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Factsheet 2: the Passage of a Bill Through Parliament
    PARLIAMENTARY FACTSHEET 2: THE PASSAGE OF A BILL THROUGH PARLIAMENT 1. The Initial Idea The idea, or inspiration, for a piece of legislation can come from a variety of sources, including political parties (often as part of their election manifesto), a ministerial brainwave or, more commonly, from civil service officials, either through consultation or teams of policy specialists. A piece of legislation may also be introduced in order to make an international treaty or a Directive from the European Union part of UK law (“transposition”). The Cabinet decides on the priorities for each legislative session. A legislative session lasts for about a year and normally commences around November.1 In general, between 15 and 20 major Bills can be accommodated in each session. The Queen’s Speech marks the beginning of a legislative session and sets out the Government’s legislative programme for the session. 2. Drafting the Bill The content of a Bill is the responsibility of ministers and their civil servants. Ministers determine the overall scope of a Bill, while civil servants are responsible for working out the detail. A team of lawyers in the Parliamentary Counsel Office, part of the Cabinet Office, drafts the Bill based on the instructions of the Government department concerned. Prior to drafting a Bill, the Government may organise a period of formal consultation. This will involve the publication of either a Green Paper or a White Paper, in connection with which the general public and interested organisations can submit their comments and suggestions. Green Paper (or consultation document): this is an exploratory document which is often issued when the Government has not decided what action to take.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bill Procedure
    Public bill procedure Lords Key D Bill created D D (conceptually) Should only be Prerogative consents actualised once per work package Motion for leave set down for Legislative Consent Motion for leave Legislative Consent Legislative Consent consideration D Motion tabled lapsed Motion tabled Motion tabled SO No (tabled?) ! Not (precludes) 23 Commons & D D D Northern Ireland D D Requirement for Motion for leave Prince of Wales D withdrawn National Assembly for Scottish Parliament Requirement for || Or Assembly D consent D D D Great Steward of Ten Minute Rule Bills Wales Scotland consent !! D Ways and Means Debate did not resolution & Requirement for Motion for leave happen ! tabled And Question put on Queen’s consent moved (set down?) Question put on Question put on Legislative Consent D Legislative Consent Legislative Consent Motion D & Commons ! desire Motion Motion D Beg to agreement Motion for leave not First reading introduce D D moved Decision step (allows) Bill printed at end of Motion to adjourn Explanatory First reading - D D First reading - first reading put by Speaker statement in support introduction of the D D D D introduction of the Prince of Wales of motion for leave bill from the House of Queen’s consent bill Great Steward of consent decision decision Commons ! ! ! Order to print the Bill ! ! Scotland consent ! decision at end of first reading SO Informed by public Standing Order D Legislative Consent Legislative Consent Legislative Consent Legislative Consent & Legislative Consent Legislative Consent Motion approved D D
    [Show full text]
  • Short Briefing Note Diana Johnson's Ten
    SHORT BRIEFING NOTE DIANA JOHNSON’S TEN MINUTE RULE MOTION ON ABORTION 23 OCTOBER 2018 ● On Tuesday 23rd October, Diana Johnson MP will bring forward a Ten Minute Rule Motion regarding a proposed change to abortion law to Parliament. She has indicated that she will be seeking a vote on the motion. ● The Johnson Bill is being presented by some as a move to introduce abortion access in Northern Ireland but in reality, would remove many of the current legal safeguards around abortion and introduce one of the most extreme abortion regimes in the world right across England, Wales and Northern Ireland: ○ Abortion campaigners have indicated that they are seeking to remove sections of the Offences Against the Persons Act, Infant Life (Preservation) Act, Criminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) and the Abortion Act. ● This radical change to legislation should be opposed for the following reasons: ○ The Abortion Act, along with along with the legal safeguards it provides, would no longer apply to abortions through to 24-weeks, i.e six months, gestation. ■ Abortions could be obtained for any reason whatsoever, including gender-selective abortion. ■ Abortions would no longer require the supervision of registered medical practitioners. ■ There would no longer be a legal requirement that two doctors certify an abortion. ○ Self-abortion (‘DIY-abortion’) right up-to-birth would be legalised. Any means would be legal. ○ The legal protections contained in the Offences Against the Persons Act protecting against online suppliers of abortion pills or equipment to undertake a ‘DIY’ or ‘backstreet’ abortion would be removed. ○ It would trash the devolution settlement by amending abortion law to impose abortion on Northern Ireland against the wishes of the people of Northern Ireland1.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressio~Al Record~Hous~. May 1
    4672 CONGRESSIO~AL RECORD~HOUS~. MAY 1, observation does not apply in this case. No time has yet been fixed standing inuebtedness dne to him from certain bands of said Indians, which has never been paid to said Crooks, nor to his le~al representatives; and for Congress to adjourn, and it can not at present be said that this Whereas the said Ramsay Crooks, in his lifetune, tiled said claims in the is the last month of the session. office of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, showing that there was due to At the same time I suggest to the Senator that he agree that the him from the Pllla~er and Lake Winnebagoshish band the sum of $6,410.80, and from a certain other band, known as the Chippewa Indians of the Missis­ Senate shall meet to-morrow at the usual time (to-morrow being sippi, the sum of $3,308.82, making a total amount of such indebtedness of Saturday, it will be almost impossible to get Senators here earlier $9,TI0.62: Therefore than that hour) and proceed with the bill immediately after the B e i t enacted, etc., That there be, and there hereby is, appropriated, out of the Treasury of the United States, from any money not otherwise appropri­ ordinary morning business is concluded, which will consume a ted. the sum of $9.TI9.62, to enable the Secretary of the Interior to examine some ten or fifteen minutes. Then let the general discussion go said claims a gainst the Pillager and Lake Winnebagoshish band of Indians in on until half past 2 o'clock, and after that under a ten-minute the sum of $6,410.80 a.nd the Chippewa Indians of the Minnesota band in the sum of $3,303.82, and l?ay said amount, or so much thereof as he shall find to rule, with the distinct understanding that we shall remain here be due, to the administrator of the estate of said Ramsay Crooks from the and finish the bill to-morrow night.
    [Show full text]