DOCSLIB.ORG

Broadband Today

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Broadband Today BROADBAND TODAY BROADBAND TODAY A STAFF REPORT TO WILLIAM E. KENNARD, CHAIRMAN FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ON INDUSTRY MONITORING SESSIONS CONVENED BY CABLE SERVICES BUREAU DEBORAH A. LATHEN BUREAU CHIEF CABLE SERVICES BUREAU OCTOBER 1999 BROADBAND TODAY TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD . 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 8 I. BROADBAND: THE DEBATE OVER ACCESS . 9 A. The Debate Defined . 9 The Issue . 10 The Parties . 10 Arguments For Mandated Open Access . 11 Arguments Against Mandated Open Access . 11 B. Roots of the Debate . 12 The First 706 Report . 12 The AT&T/TCI Merger. 12 AT&T/TCI v. City of Portland . 13 C. Recent Developments . 14 Broward County. 14 San Francisco. 14 City of Fairfax . 14 Other Localities. 15 Congressional Action. 15 Federal Policy . .15 II. TECHNICAL BACKGROUND . .16 A. What is Broadband? . 16 As Defined in the Section 706 Report . .17 The Definition of Broadband is Elastic and Does Not Include Content. .17 B. Cable Broadband. 18 Changing Architecture. 18 Hybrid Fiber-Optic Coaxial Cable (HFC) . .18 Increased Bandwidth, Cleaner Transmission . 18 Not Without Problems. 19 C. Telephone Company Broadband- Digital Subscriber Lines (xDSL). 20 D. Wireless Technologies: Fixed Wireless and Satellite . .21 BROADBAND TODAY 3 III. THE BROADBAND INDUSTRY . 23 A. Generally. 23 Narrowband Still Dominant. 23 B. Internet Over Cable. 23 Cable Modem Deployment: Over 1 Million Subscribers . .25 Industry Projections for Cable Modem Deployment and Plant Upgrades. 26 C. DSL Deployment. 27 Industry Projections and Announcements for DSL. 28 D. Wireless Technologies: Fixed Wireless and Satellite . 29 IV. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS . 31 A. The Cable Bureau’s Monitoring Sessions. 31 B. Participants. 31 C. Questions Posed to Participants. 32 D. Responses and Preliminary Findings. 32 1. The broadband industry is nascent . 32 2. Cable modem deployment spurs alternative broadband technologies . 33 3. Regulation or the threat of regulation ultimately slows deployment of broadband. 33 4. Market forces will compel cable companies to negotiate access agreements with unaffiliated ISPs, preventing cable companies from keeping systems closed and proprietary. 34 5. If market forces fail and cable becomes the dominant means of Internet access, regulation might then be necessary to promote competition. 35 6. There was no consensus on how to implement “open access” from a regulatory perspective. 36 7. There was no consensus on how to implement “open access” from a technical perspective. 39 BROADBAND TODAY 4 8. Rapid nationwide broadband deployment depends on a national policy . 39 V. ANALYSIS . 41 A. Risks of the Commission Continuing Its Policy of Regulatory Restraint . 41 B. Benefits of the Commission Continuing Its Policy of Regulatory Restraint . 44 C. Evidence the Commission’s National Broadband Policy is Facilitating Vigorous Deployment and Competition . 46 VI. CONCLUSION . 47 ENDNOTES . 48 APPENDIX A: Breakdown of Online Universe APPENDIX B: Residential Broadband Subscribers 1999 – 2007 APPENDIX C: Questions Submitted to Panelists GLOSSARY BROADBAND TODAY 5 The Blind Man and the Elephant It was six wise men of Indostan To learning much inclined, Who went to see the Elephant – (though all of them were blind), That each by observation—might satisfy his mind. The First approached the Elephant, And happening to fall Against his broad and sturdy side—At once began to bawl: “God bless me! But the Elephant—Is very like a wall! The Second, feeling of the tusk, Cried, “Ho! What have we here? So very round and smooth and sharp – To me ‘tis mighty clear This wonder of an Elephant – Is very like a spear. The Third approached the animal, And happening to take The squirming trunk within his hands, -- Thus boldly up and spake: “I see,” quote he, “the Elephant—Is very like a snake!” The Fourth reached out an eager hand, And felt about the knee: "What most the wondrous beast is like Is very plain," quoth he; "Tis clear enough the Elephant Is very like a tree!" The Fifth who chanced to touch the ear, Said: “Even the blindest man Can tell what this resembles most; -- Deny the fact who can, This marvel of an Elephant – Is very like a fan!” The Sixth no sooner had begun About the beast to grope, Than seizing on the swinging tail –That fell within his scope, “I see”, said he, “the Elephant – Is very like a rope! And so these men of Indostan Disputed loud and long, Each in his own opinion –Exceeding stiff and strong Though each was partly in the right –And all were in the wrong! --John Godfrey Saxe BROADBAND TODAY 6 FOREWORD In May and July 1999, at the request of Chairman Kennard, the Cable Services Bureau, with the participation of the Common Carrier Bureau, the Office of Plans and Policy, and the Office of Engineering and Technology, convened a series of Monitoring Sessions on the state of the broadband industry. The goal of these Sessions was threefold: (1) to establish an ongoing dialogue with the major stakeholders involved in the provision and delivery of broadband services to American consumers; (2) to obtain a comprehensive perspective on the status of the residential broadband industry; and (3) to receive perspectives on the Commission’s regulatory policy options. We invited a distinguished and diverse group of experts, including representatives from Internet service providers (ISPs), online service providers (OSPs), local exchange carriers (LECs), long distance telephone companies (IXCs), community organizations, financial analysts, academics and local franchising authorities (LFAs). We asked these participants to engage in candid, not-for-attribution discussion of the major issues and challenges facing consumers, the industry, regulators and policymakers with respect to the deployment of broadband services. The following Report contains our summary and analyses of those Monitoring Sessions, in addition to a current survey of the issues, technological developments and market trends that have become integral to the broadband debate. We have learned a great deal about the state of the broadband industry as a result of those sessions. We have discovered that broadband is an awesome, yet largely inchoate, technology that will bring the Internet and advanced services to millions of Americans. We have learned that the Commission’s longstanding de-regulatory policy toward enhanced services, generally, and broadband services, particularly, has contributed to the Internet’s phenomenal growth. And we have learned that there is yet much to learn. We have learned that not even the experts are any more “sighted” at this early stage of the rapidly evolving broadband industry than the wise men of Indostan referred to at the beginning of this Report. While it is clear that broadband will play an important role in the lives of most Americans, it is not clear whether current systems will maintain their same positions in the broadband industry, or whether new, and as yet undiscovered systems will dominate the market in the long term. The splintered and divergent views expressed by the experts in our Monitoring Sessions demonstrate the difficulty in arriving at these conclusions. Although this Report endeavors to capture the sense of where things are now, we recognize that the rapid pace of technological development and a dynamic and competitive market will require our monitoring efforts to continue. Thus, we anticipate holding future Monitoring Sessions with other sectors of the broadband industry, BROADBAND TODAY 7 including e-commerce and Internet companies, to ascertain their views on the relevant issues. We acknowledge and appreciate the cooperation and expert assistance of the Directors and staff of the Office of Plans and Policy, the Office of Engineering and Technology, and the Chief and staff of the Common Carrier Bureau, without which we would not have been able to prepare this Report.* Deborah A. Lathen Bureau Chief Cable Services Bureau BROADBAND TODAY 8 Executive Summary This Report summarizes the results of two sets of Monitoring Sessions conducted by the Cable Services Bureau on recent developments, major issues, and the current state of the broadband industry. At the outset, the Monitoring Sessions had two principal objectives: (1) To ascertain a better understanding of the broadband industry since the filing of the Section 706 Report; and (2) To answer the question: Should the government require cable companies to provide access to their plant by unaffiliated Internet and online service providers? Part I examines the principal issues, parties and arguments in the open access debate. This part traces the roots of the open access issue as discussed in the FCC’s first Section 706 Report to Congress, the Commission’s Memorandum and Order on the AT&T/TCI License Transfer, and the Commission’s “friend of the court” brief in AT&T v. City of Portland. This part also discusses recent developments in legal, legislative and regulatory proceedings, particularly actions by municipalities. Part II outlines the definition of broadband as defined in Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and provides an in-depth technical discussion of broadband service and technology. Part III discusses the broadband industry at large and provides a snapshot of the state of cable modem, digital subscriber line (DSL), fixed wireless, and satellite technologies for the provision of Internet services. It also details the schedules and projections for deployment of these technologies. Part IV details the preliminary findings reached in the Monitoring Sessions convened by the Bureau. This part also lists the participants (by category) and summarizes the questions posed to the participants and their responses. Part V contains the conclusions reached as a result of the Report, particularly whether the government, at this time, should mandate that cable operators provide access by unaffiliated Internet service and on-line service providers to the cable platform. BROADBAND TODAY 9 I. Broadband: The Debate Over Access A. The Debate Defined Broadband refers to technology that will allow users to access the Internet and Internet-related.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Broadband Changes Everything
    Broadband Changes Everything OECD Roundtable On Communications Convergence UK Department of Trade and Industry Conference Centre London June 2-3, 2005 Michael Hennessy President Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association CCTA Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) z Represents 78 cable companies CCTA’s primary role is to communicate the industry views to regulatory bodies, governments, and other stakeholders CCTA helps members to promote standards of excellence, assess new technology and business opportunities and advance the development of services to Canadian consumers CCTA recently changed its name to reflect shift from broadcasting to broadband 2 Industry Background Structure z 4 large companies z Over 80 smaller companies z $4.5 billion in revenues z Over 11.6 million homes passed z Over 7.5 million cable television customers z Over 1.6 million digital cable subscribers z Over 3.1million high-speed internet customers z Digital telephone launched 2005 3 1 Cable Industry Services Regulated under both Broadcasting & Telecommunications Acts Program distribution remains cable’s core service z Basic cable accounts for less than half of all cable revenues z Growth in distribution revenues driven by digital cable Broadband internet is cable’s fastest growing segment Cable telephony represents a new opportunity 4 More than TV Cable industry engaged in 5 year/$7.5 billion digital transformation Grown from simply video distributors to suppliers of advanced media and communications on demand IP is the most recent stage in a communications revolution that began 25 years ago Transformation accelerating from VoIP today to IPTV tomorrow 5 “Broadband by Cable” The Goal: z Accelerating the transition to fully digital broadband cable networks to be the preferred choice of consumers for all their entertainment, information and communications needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications Under the Seas: the Evolving Cable Network and Its
    Communications under the Seas The Evolving Cable Network and Its Implications edited by Bernard Finn and Daqing Yang The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England © 2009 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. For information about special quantity discounts, please email special_sales@mitpress .mit.edu This book was set in Bembo by The MIT Press. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Communications under the seas : the evolving cable network and its implications / edited by Bernard Finn and Daqing Yang. p. cm. — (Dibner Institute studies in the history of science and technology) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-01286-7 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Cables, Submarine—History. 2. Telecommunication—Social aspects—History. 3. Communication, International. I. Finn, Bernard S., 1932– II. Yang, Daqing, 1964– TK5103.15.C66 2009 621.387’8409162—dc22 2008042011 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Index Admiralty (U.K.), 187 for voice communications, 37–38, 46, “Memorandum on the Protection of 51 British Submarine Cables,” 194 vacuum tube amplifiers, 30, 37, 46, 247 Ahvenainen, Jorma, 119 Anglo-American Telegraph Company, 29t, Alcatel, 175, 280 66, 71, 82–83, 162–163, 166 Alexander, grand duke of Russia, 124, 126 anti-trust legislation, 199 Algeria, 185 Associated Press, 169, 266 All America Cables, 33, 35, 84, 280 Atlantic Telegraph Company, 18, 66, 167 All-American Telegraph Companies, 89 AT&T.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.5Gbps Internet Cable Modem with XFINITY® Voice
    Data Sheet | CM2050V 2.5Gbps Internet Cable Modem with XFINITY® Voice 2 PHONE LINES Overview Experience a new generation of of today and tomorrow. DOCSIS® monthly cable modem rental fees†. cable modems that deliver up to 3.1 delivers the world’s fastest cable CM2050V includes two telephones 2.5Gbps Multi-Gigabit Internet Internet with speeds that are 10 ports that automatically prioritize speed, so you can be ready for the times faster than DOCSIS® 3.0. Save voice over internet for clear and fastest cable Internet service plans up to $168 per year by eliminating uninterrupted calls. PAGE 1 of 5 Data Sheet | CM2050V 2.5Gbps Internet Cable Modem with XFINITY® Voice Built for XFINITY® from Comcast Internet with Voice • Two (2) telephone ports that • Delivers up to 2.5Gbps ultra high speed • Built for Gigabit + 2.5Gbps cable automatically prioritize voice over Internet connections Internet service plans available today internet for the best call clarity and ready for future upgrades • DOCSIS® 3.1 is up to 10X faster than • Enhanced call features include the DOCSIS® 3.0 standard • Save up to $168 per year by eliminating 3-way conference calling, caller ID, monthly cable modem rental fee† call forwarding and more The NETGEAR Difference - CM2050V • 2.5Gbps ultra high speed Internet • Easy installation • Required for Gigabit XFINITY Internet connections with Voice plans • DOCSIS 3.1 Technology • Supports IPv6 Performance and Use • Ready for XFINITY's fastest Internet • Multi-gig Internet speed system— • Backward Compatible—Backward speeds with voice available by Cable Experience a new generation of cable compatible to 32x8 channel bonding in Service Providers—Built ready for modems that deliver up to 2.5Gbps DOCSIS® 3.0 mode Gigabit (and more) cable Internet Multi-Gigabit Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Assumptions Milestone 1
    Specific Assumptions Milestone 1 - Advisory Committee Final Report A. Assumptions 1. Advisory Committee completes final report on current schedule 2. Advisory Committee report recommends system choice 3. No litigation that impedes process Task 2 - NPRM Generation & Channel Allotment A. Assumptions 1. FCC issues NPRM on announced schedule 2. Channels are allotted to cities at release of NPRM 3. FCC accepts Advisory Committee recommendation on system choice 4. No litigation that impedes process Task 3 - Comment & Decision Period A. Assumptions 1. Allows time for comments & reply comments 2. Provides time for preparation of Final Report & Order 3. No litigation that impedes process Milestone 4 - FCC Report & Order A. Assumptions 1. Final Report & Order confirms choice of single system Task 5 - Station Assignment Process A. Assumptions 1. Station channel assignment conducted after Final Report & Order 2. Stations cannot begin designs until after channel assignment 3. No litigation that impedes process Task 6 - Litigation A. Assumptions 1. Stations will experience some delay from litigation 2. All litigation, wherever in process, aggregated at this point 3. Litigation is not extended, is resolved on expedited basis 4. Litigation affects certainty of channel assignment for stations -2- Task 7 - Transmitter Site Acquisition A. Assumptions 1. Station determines non-usability of existing tower well in advance 2. Station begins search for land in advance of FCC decision 3. Station waits for end of litigation before completing acquisition 4. Little suitable space available in major metropolitan areas 5. Sufficient space can ultimately be found on the market Task 8 - AntennalTower Design A. Assumptions 1. Station will not begin final design until channel & location are certain 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Notes Introduction Performance Management & Cable
    Application Notes Contents Title Managing Cable Telephony Services Introduction...................................................... 1 Series VoIP Performance Management Performance Management Date June 2004 & Cable Telephony .......................................... 1 The New VoIP Performance Management Architecture ..................................................... 2 Overview Common VoIP Performance Metrics ............... 4 This application note describes the typical performance issues that cable operators encounter Performance Management when deploying cable telephony networks and Reporting Protocols ......................................... 5 introduces a management framework that enables Applying the VoIP Performance Management them to detect, address and resolve these Architecture To Cable Telephony ........................ 6 problems. Problem Resolution, Detection & Diagnosis ....... 7 Summary .......................................................... 8 Introduction Performance Management & Cable Telephony Packet Telephony is an exciting new source of revenue for cable operators, so it is essential to build Cable operators are familiar with many of the fault and performance management systems that problems they will face when deploying cable support quick problem detection and resolution and telephony networks due to their past experiences avoid costly truck rolls. Cable operators are aware introducing cable modem service: that HFC networks can suffer from performance- related problems, but they are less familiar with the
    [Show full text]
  • VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (Voip)
    S. HRG. 108–1027 VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL (VoIP) HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 24, 2004 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 22–462 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:00 Dec 07, 2016 Jkt 075679 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\DOCS\22462.TXT JACKIE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, South Carolina, CONRAD BURNS, Montana Ranking TRENT LOTT, Mississippi DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas JOHN B. BREAUX, Louisiana GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota PETER G. FITZGERALD, Illinois RON WYDEN, Oregon JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada BARBARA BOXER, California GEORGE ALLEN, Virginia BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire MARIA CANTWELL, Washington FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey JEANNE BUMPUS, Republican Staff Director and General Counsel ROBERT W. CHAMBERLIN, Republican Chief Counsel KEVIN D. KAYES, Democratic Staff Director and Chief Counsel GREGG ELIAS, Democratic General Counsel (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:00 Dec 07, 2016 Jkt 075679 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\DOCS\22462.TXT JACKIE C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on February 24, 2004 ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Telecom Meltdown for a Listing of Recent Titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, Turn to the Back of This Book
    The Great Telecom Meltdown For a listing of recent titles in the Artech House Telecommunications Library, turn to the back of this book. The Great Telecom Meltdown Fred R. Goldstein a r techhouse. com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the U.S. Library of Congress. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Goldstein, Fred R. The great telecom meltdown.—(Artech House telecommunications Library) 1. Telecommunication—History 2. Telecommunciation—Technological innovations— History 3. Telecommunication—Finance—History I. Title 384’.09 ISBN 1-58053-939-4 Cover design by Leslie Genser © 2005 ARTECH HOUSE, INC. 685 Canton Street Norwood, MA 02062 All rights reserved. Printed and bound in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. All terms mentioned in this book that are known to be trademarks or service marks have been appropriately capitalized. Artech House cannot attest to the accuracy of this information. Use of a term in this book should not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark or service mark. International Standard Book Number: 1-58053-939-4 10987654321 Contents ix Hybrid Fiber-Coax (HFC) Gave Cable Providers an Advantage on “Triple Play” 122 RBOCs Took the Threat Seriously 123 Hybrid Fiber-Coax Is Developed 123 Cable Modems
    [Show full text]
  • ANSI/SCTE 232 2016 Key Performance Metrics
    ENGINEERING COMMITTEE Energy Management Subcommittee AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD ANSI/SCTE 232 2016 Key Performance Metrics: Energy Efficiency & Functional Density of CMTS, CCAP, and Time Server Equipment ANSI/SCTE 232 2016 NOTICE The Society of Cable Telecommunications Engineers (SCTE) Standards and Operational Practices (hereafter called “documents”) are intended to serve the public interest by providing specifications, test methods and procedures that promote uniformity of product, interchangeability, best practices and ultimately the long term reliability of broadband communications facilities. These documents shall not in any way preclude any member or non-member of SCTE from manufacturing or selling products not conforming to such documents, nor shall the existence of such standards preclude their voluntary use by those other than SCTE members. SCTE assumes no obligations or liability whatsoever to any party who may adopt the documents. Such adopting party assumes all risks associated with adoption of these documents, and accepts full responsibility for any damage and/or claims arising from the adoption of such documents. Attention is called to the possibility that implementation of this document may require the use of subject matter covered by patent rights. By publication of this document, no position is taken with respect to the existence or validity of any patent rights in connection therewith. SCTE shall not be responsible for identifying patents for which a license may be required or for conducting inquiries into the legal validity or scope of those patents that are brought to its attention. Patent holders who believe that they hold patents which are essential to the implementation of this document have been requested to provide information about those patents and any related licensing terms and conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • BCE Inc. 2015 Annual Report
    Leading the way in communications BCE INC. 2015 ANNUAL REPORT for 135 years BELL LEADERSHIP AND INNOVATION PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OUR GOAL For Bell to be recognized by customers as Canada’s leading communications company OUR STRATEGIC IMPERATIVES Invest in broadband networks and services 11 Accelerate wireless 12 Leverage wireline momentum 14 Expand media leadership 16 Improve customer service 18 Achieve a competitive cost structure 20 Bell is leading Canada’s broadband communications revolution, investing more than any other communications company in the fibre networks that carry advanced services, in the products and content that make the most of the power of those networks, and in the customer service that makes all of it accessible. Through the rigorous execution of our 6 Strategic Imperatives, we gained further ground in the marketplace and delivered financial results that enable us to continue to invest in growth services that now account for 81% of revenue. Financial and operational highlights 4 Letters to shareholders 6 Strategic imperatives 11 Community investment 22 Bell archives 24 Management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) 28 Reports on internal control 112 Consolidated financial statements 116 Notes to consolidated financial statements 120 2 We have re-energized one of Canada’s most respected brands, transforming Bell into a competitive force in every communications segment. Achieving all our financial targets for 2015, we strengthened our financial position and continued to create value for shareholders. DELIVERING INCREASED
    [Show full text]
  • Cable-Telco-Wireless Competition in Florida: Facts and Consequences
    Cable-Telco-Wireless Competition In Florida: Facts and Consequences T William E. Taylor Senior Vice President 35th Annual PURC Conference February 5-6, 2008 Intermodal Competition and Telecommunications Deregulation Overview July 2006 § Updated state of competition in Intermodal Competition in Florida Telecommunications Florida (2006): Prepared for: BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., Embarq Florida, Inc., Verizon – Wireline carriers Florida Inc., and Windstream Communications Florida, Inc. – Intermodal carriers By William E. Taylor — Cable Senior Vice President Harold Ware — Wireless Vice President Joel M. David — VoIP Senior Analyst http://www.psc.state.fl.us/library/filings/06/06521-06/nera%20fl%20white%20paper.doc § Effects on regulation – Parity across platforms – Universal service – Wholesale regulation 1 Intermodal Telecommunications Competition in Florida 2007 Intermodal Telecommunications Competition in Florida THEN: Florida PSC: “Status of Competition in the Telecommunications Industry as of May 31, 2005”: § [A] report on local competition would be incomplete without [an]analysis of the alternatives, such as wireless, cable (VoIP-based), broadband, and …(VoIP). These…intermodal competitors…have developed and evolved to challenge the traditional telephone wireline companies for market share. (p. 2) § Simple CLEC market share …understates the true market share held by competitors including wireless, cable, and other IP-enabled (Internet Protocol) providers. The gap between the CLEC market share and the true size of the competitive
    [Show full text]
  • Touchstone Telephony Modem TM402P Spec Sheet
    Touchstone™ Telephony Modem TM402P Application The Touchstone Telephony Modem TM402P delivers two lines of primary line Voice over IP • Long-life lithium-ion (VoIP) along with High-Speed Data Access. The Touchstone Telephony Modem TM402P has battery technology integrated lithium-ion battery back-up capability along with industry leading efficient power minimizes operations management to guarantee continued service of up to 16 hours during an extended power expense outage. Leadership in Battery Technology • Toll quality voice The Touchstone TM402P is the first E-MTA with lithium-ion battery back-up capabilities. A supplies a superior lithium-ion battery pack provides 6 to 10 years of service life versus the 3 to 5 years that a subscriber experience sealed lead acid (SLA) battery provide. Its smaller size and lighter weight also allow the Touchstone TM402 to be packaged a more consumer-friendly style. The Touchstone TM402 can use either one or two lithium-ion battery packs. Each lithium-ion battery pack can deliver up to 8 hours of battery back-up capabilities. The Touchstone Telephony Modem is also • DOCSIS® 2.0 and available in non-battery back-up versions for operators that do not plan to offer lifeline service. PacketCable™ 1.0 certified design The use of lithium-ion batteries offers a solution with a lower overall expense. In addition to its longer life, the lithium-ion battery is also simpler to replace. While replacing a SLA battery provides a solution for usually requires the operator to make a truck roll, a consumer can replace the lithium-ion the long-term battery pack.
    [Show full text]
  • Cable Network Handbook
    CEL-TR-HFC-HANDBOOK-V4_3-091001 Technical Report Cable Network Handbook; Overview of Architecture, Technical Features and Services of Integrated Broadband and Cable TV Networks CEL-TR-HFC-HANDBOOK-V4_3-091001 2 Cable Network Handbook Keywords Cable Network, HFC Network, Television, Broadband Services Cable Europe Labs Cable House Avenue des Arts 41 B – 1040 Brussels BELGIUM Tel.: +32 2 521 17 63 Fax: +32 2 521 79 76 Important notice This technical report is the result of a cooperative effort undertaken at the direction of Cable Europe Labs for the benefit of the cable industry and its customers. This document may contain references to other documents not owned or controlled by Cable Europe Labs. Use and understanding of this document may require access to such other documents. Designing, manufacturing, distributing, using, selling, or servicing products, or providing services, based on this document may require intellectual property licenses from third parties for technology referenced in this document. Neither Cable Europe Labs nor any member company is responsible to any party for any liability of any nature whatsoever resulting from or arising out of use or reliance upon this document, or any document referenced herein. This document is furnished on an "AS IS" basis and neither Cable Europe Labs nor its members provides any representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, noninfringement, or fitness for a particular purpose of this document, or any document referenced herein. Individual copies of the present document can be downloaded from: http://www.cable-europe.eu/labs The present document may be made available in more than one electronic version or in print.
    [Show full text]