DOCSLIB.ORG

PEIR Chapter 16 Seascpae, Landscape and Visual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2.16 Volume 2, Chapter 16 Seascape, landscape and visual 2 © Wood Group UK Limited Contents Figure list 4 16. Offshore seascape landscape and visual amenity 9 16.1 Introduction 9 16.2 Relevant legislation, policy and other information and guidance 10 Introduction 10 Legislation and national planning policy 10 Local planning policy 16 Other relevant information and guidance 19 16.3 Consultation and engagement 20 Overview 20 Early engagement 20 Scoping opinion 21 Informal consultation and engagement 23 Evidence Plan Process (EPP) 24 16.4 Scope of the assessment 26 Overview 26 Spatial scope and study area 26 Temporal scope 26 Potential receptors 26 Potential effects 30 Activities or impacts scoped out of assessment 32 16.5 Methodology for baseline data gathering 34 Overview 34 Desk study 34 Site surveys 39 Data limitations 40 16.6 Baseline conditions 41 Current Baseline 41 Future baseline 125 16.7 Basis for PEIR assessment 126 Maximum design scenario 126 Embedded environmental measures 131 16.8 Methodology for PEIR assessment 135 Introduction 135 Summary of SLVIA methodology 135 Visual representations methodology 139 16.9 Preliminary assessment: Construction phase 139 Effects on Seascape Character 139 Effects on Landscape Character 140 Effects on views and visual amenity 140 16.10 Preliminary assessment: Operation and maintenance phase 141 Rampion 2 PEIR. Volume 2 Chapter 16: Seascape, landscape and visual amenity 3 © Wood Group UK Limited Introduction 141 South Downs National Park (SDNP) 141 West Sussex South Coast Plain 199 East Sussex and the City of Brighton & Hove 227 Hampshire and the Solent 237 Isle of Wight 244 16.11 Preliminary assessment: Decommissioning phase 276 Residual effects on Seascape Character 276 Residual effects on Landscape Character 276 Residual effects on views and visual amenity 277 16.12 Preliminary assessment: Cumulative effects 277 Approach 277 16.13 Transboundary effects 278 16.14 Inter-related effects 278 Overview 278 Inter-related seascape effects 279 Inter-related landscape effects 279 Inter-related visual effects 280 16.15 Summary of residual effects 282 Introduction 282 South Downs National Park (SDNP) 283 West Sussex South Coast Plain 290 East Sussex and the City of Brighton & Hove 293 Hampshire and the Solent 294 Isle of Wight 294 16.16 Further work to be undertaken for ES 298 Introduction 298 Baseline 298 Assessment 299 Consultation and engagement 299 16.17 Glossary of terms and abbreviations 300 16.18 References 305 Table 16-1 Legislation relevant to seascape, landscape and visual receptors 10 Table 16-2 National planning policy relevant to seascape, landscape and visual receptors 13 Table 16-3 Local planning policy relevant to seascape, landscape and visual amenity 16 Table 16-4 PINS Scoping Opinion responses – Seascape, landscape and visual 21 Table 16-5 Seascape, landscape and visual receptors requiring detailed assessment 28 Table 16-6 Potential effects on seascape, landscape and visual receptors scoped in for further assessment 30 Table 16-7 Activities or impacts scoped out of assessment 32 Table 16-8 Data sources used to inform the [add aspect name] PEIR assessment 34 Rampion 2 PEIR. Volume 2 Chapter 16: Seascape, landscape and visual amenity 4 © Wood Group UK Limited Table 16-9 Site surveys undertaken 40 Table 16-10 Visibility frequency 50 Table 16-11 Viewpoints included in the SLVIA 53 Table 16-12 SDNP Special Qualities 70 Table 16-13 South Downs Way 80 Table 16-14 SDNP Baseline Views 86 Table 16-15 Chichester Harbour AONB Special Qualities 99 Table 16-16 West Sussex Baseline Views 105 Table 16-17 East Sussex and City of Brighton & Hove baseline views 110 Table 16-18 Hampshire baseline views 114 Table 16-19 IoW AONB Special qualities 116 Table 16-20 Isle of Wight Coastal Path 120 Table 16-21 Isle of Wight Baseline Views 124 Table 16-22 WTG maximum assessment assumptions 127 Table 16-23 Relevant seascape, landscape and visual amenity embedded environmental measures 132 Table 16-24 Impact Significance Matrix – Seascape/Landscape Effects 138 Table 16-25 Preliminary assessment of Seascape Character (SDNP) 142 Table 16-26 Preliminary Assessment of SDNP Landscape Character 145 Table 16-27 Preliminary assessment of SDNP viewpoints 163 Table 16-28 Preliminary Assessment of South Downs Way 176 Table 16-29 Preliminary assessment of SDNP special qualities 187 Table 16-30 Preliminary Assessment of Seascape Character (West Sussex) 200 Table 16-31 Preliminary assessment of West Sussex Landscape Character 205 Table 16-32 Preliminary Assessment of West Sussex Viewpoints 213 Table 16-33 Preliminary assessment of Chichester Harbour AONB special qualities 222 Table 16-34 Preliminary assessment of Seascape Character (East Sussex) 228 Table 16-35 Preliminary assessment of East Sussex and City of Brighton & Hove viewpoints 232 Table 16-36 Preliminary assessment of Seascape Character (Hampshire) 237 Table 16-37 Preliminary Assessment of Hampshire Landscape Character 239 Table 16-38 Preliminary Assessment of Hampshire Viewpoints 240 Table 16-39 Preliminary Assessment of Seascape Character (IoW) 245 Table 16-40 Preliminary Assessment of Isle of Wight Landscape Character 249 Table 16-41 Preliminary assessment of Isle of Wight viewpoints 254 Table 16-42 Preliminary Assessment of Isle of Wight Coastal Path 257 Table 16-43 Preliminary assessment of Isle of Wight AONB special qualities 269 Table 16-44 Further consultation and engagement 299 Table 16-45 Glossary of terms and abbreviations 300 Figure list Volume 3: Figures Figure 16.1 SLVIA Project Design Envelope Figure 16.2 Figure number not used Figure 16.3 Site Location and SLVIA Study Area Rampion 2 PEIR. Volume 2 Chapter 16: Seascape, landscape and visual amenity 5 © Wood Group UK Limited Figure 16.4 Seascape Character Figure 16.5 Landscape Character (National) Figure 16.6a Landscape Character (County) Figure 16.6b Landscape Character (County) - Legend Figure 16.7 Landscape Designations Figure 16.8 Landform Figure 16.9 Visual Receptors Figure 16.10 Viewpoints Figure 16.11 Baseline Lighting - South Downs National Park Figure 16.12 South Downs Dark Sky Reserve Figure 16.13 Blade Tip ZTV 210 m WTG Figure 16.14a Blade Tip ZTV (SLVIA Maximum Design Scenario) (325m Blade Tip) (A3) Figure 16.14b Blade Tip ZTV (SLVIA Maximum Design Scenario) (325m Blade Tip) (A1) Figure 16.15 Blade Tip ZTV with Surface Feature Screening Figure 16.16 Hub Height ZTV (SLVIA Maximum Design Scenario) (177.5 m Hub Height) Figure 16.17 Horizontal Angle ZTV Figure 16.18 Blade Tip ZTV with Seascape Character Figure 16.19a Blade Tip ZTV Landscape Character (County) - Map 1 East Figure 16.19b Blade Tip ZTV Landscape Character (County) - Map 2 Central Figure 16.19c Blade Tip ZTV Landscape Character (County) - Map 3 West Figure 16.19d Blade Tip ZTV Landscape Character (County) - Map 4 Isle of Wight Figure 16.20a Blade Tip ZTV with Landscape Designations - Map 1 East Figure 16.20b Blade Tip ZTV with Landscape Designations - Map 2 Central Figure 16.20c Blade Tip ZTV with Landscape Designations - Map 3 West Figure 16.20d Blade Tip ZTV with Landscape Designations - Map 4 Isle of Wight Figure 16.21a Blade Tip ZTV with Visual Receptors - Map 1 East Figure 16.21b Blade Tip ZTV with Visual Receptors - Map 2 Central Figure 16.21c Blade Tip ZTV with Visual Receptors - Map 3 West Figure 16.21d Blade Tip ZTV with Visual Receptors - Map 4 Isle of Wight Figure 16.22 Cumulative ZTV with Rampion 1 Figure 16.23 Blade Tip ZTV with Visibility Range Figure 16.24a Blade Tip ZTV – National Trails (Map 1 East) Figure 16.24b Blade Tip ZTV – National Trails (Map 2 Central) Figure 16.24c Blade Tip ZTV – National Trails (Map 3 West) Figure 16.24d Blade Tip ZTV – National Trails (Map 4 Isle of Wight) Figure 16.25 Nacelle Aviation Lighting ZTV - South Downs National Park Figure 16.26 Viewpoint 1 - Beachy Head Viewpoint location, 180° baseline panorama and cumulative wireline, 53.3° baseline photography, 53.3° wireline, 53.5° photomontage Figure 16.27 Viewpoint 2 - Birling Gap Viewpoint location, 180° baseline panorama and cumulative wireline, 53.3° baseline photography, 53.3° wireline, 53.5° photomontage, 53.5° night-time baseline, 53.5° night-time photomontage (2000 candela) Figure 16.28 Viewpoint 3 - Seven Sisters Country Park Viewpoint location, 180° baseline panorama and cumulative wireline, 53.3° baseline photography, 53.3° wireline, 53.5° photomontage Rampion 2 PEIR. Volume 2 Chapter 16: Seascape, landscape and visual amenity 6 © Wood Group UK Limited Figure 16.29 Viewpoint 4 - Seaford Head Viewpoint location, 180° baseline panorama and cumulative wireline, 53.3° baseline photography, 53.3° wireline, 53.5° photomontage Figure 16.30 Viewpoint 5 - Newhaven (Castle Hill) Viewpoint location, 180° baseline panorama and cumulative wireline, 53.3° baseline photography, 53.3° wireline, 53.5° photomontage Figure 16.31 Viewpoint 6 – Peacehaven Viewpoint location, 180° baseline panorama and cumulative wireline, 53.3° baseline photography, 53.3° wireline, 53.5° photomontage Figure 16.32 Viewpoint 7 - Beacon Hill, Rottingdean Viewpoint location, 180° baseline panorama and cumulative wireline, 53.3° baseline photography, 53.3° wireline, 53.5° photomontage Figure 16.33 Viewpoint 8 - Brighton sea front promenade Viewpoint location, 180° baseline panorama and cumulative wireline, 53.3° baseline photography, 53.3° wireline, 53.5° photomontage, 53.5° night-time baseline, 53.5° night-time photomontage (2000 candela) Figure 16.34 Viewpoint 9 – Shoreham Harbour/A259 Viewpoint location, 180° baseline panorama and cumulative wireline,
Recommended publications
  • Landscape Character Types

    Landscape Character Types

    Acknowledgements The authors wish to express their gratitude to the various people and organisations that have assisted with the preparation of this landscape character assessment. Particular thanks are due to the members of the Steering Group at Findon Council, Peter Kirk, and Richard Bell. We are grateful for permission to include material from the South Downs National Park Geographic information System (GIS), and our thanks are due to colleagues at South Coast GIS (Paul Day and Matt Powell) who have assisted with this element of the project. Findon Parish Council would also like to gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance from the South Downs National Park Authority, provided to support the preparation of the neighbourhood plan. This study included two workshop sessions, and we are very grateful to the representatives of the Parish Council and neighbourhood planning group who gave up their time to attend the workshops and make helpful comments on the drafts of the study. We have endeavoured to faithfully include relevant suggestions and information, but apologise if we have failed to include all suggestions. The copyright of the illustrations reproduced from other sources is gratefully acknowledged; these are either the British Library (figure 8 ) or Bury Art Museum (figure 10). Whilst we acknowledge the assistance of other people and organisations, this report represents the views of David Hares Landscape Architecture alone. David Hares Lynnette Leeson April 2014 "Landscape means an area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors." (European Landscape Convention, 2000) 1 CONTENTS 1.
  • Population Change in an East Sussex Town Lewes 1660-1800

    Population Change in an East Sussex Town Lewes 1660-1800

    SUSSEX INDUSTRIAL HISTORY Winter 1971/72 & Section of the River. -i _1 7o* re, eo ,ae? /tie Enjoy the fuller flavour of Carling Black Label SUSSEX INDUSTRIAL HISTORY Journal of the Sussex Industrial Archaeology Study Group THREE WINTER 1971/72 page POPULATION CHANGE IN AN EAST SUSSEX TOWN : 2 LEWES 1660-1800 James P. Huzel KINGSTON MALTHOUSE, 1844-1971 20 Adrian Barritt NOTES AND NEWS 29 BOOK REVIEW 32 Edited by John Farrant, Arts Building, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN 1 9QN . Sussex Industrial History has as a principal objective the publication of the results of recording, surveying and preservation of industrial monuments and processes done under the aegis of the Sussex Industrial Archaeology Study Group . But its field is not narrowly defined, for it aims to integrate the findings of industrial archaeology into general historical thinking and writing, by studying the impact of industrial change, principally during the past two centuries, on a rural county. The Editor is very interested to hear from prospective contrib- utors of articles of any length, and to receive items for the `Notes and News' section on work in progress, requests for information and assistance, recent publications, forthcoming conferences and meetings. Published twice yearly ; annual subscription 75p (15s.). Subscriptions and all business or advertising correspondence should be addressed to the publisher, Phillimore & Co . Ltd., Shopwyke Hall, Chichester, Sussex . Contributions and correspondence about editorial content should be addressed to the Editor. Members of S.I.A.S.G. receive Sussex Industrial History free; enquiries about membership should be addressed to the General Secretary, E.J.
  • Agenda Item 7 Report PC15/17 Report to Planning Committee Date

    Agenda Item 7 Report PC15/17 Report to Planning Committee Date

    Agenda Item 7 Report PC15/17 Report to Planning Committee Date 9 March 2017 By Director of Planning Title of Report Revised Policies for the Pre-Submission South Downs Local Plan Purpose of Report To comment on the revised policies of the Pre-Submission South Downs Local Plan Recommendation: The Committee is recommended to 1) Endorse the direction of the policies as detailed in Appendices 1 to 7 of this report for inclusion in the Pre-Submission Local Plan document, subject to any comments made by the Planning Committee being addressed. 2) Note that the Pre-Submission Local Plan will be reported to Planning Committee for consideration prior to publication for public consultation, and 3) Note that the Pre-Submission Local Plan document will be subject to final approval by the National Park Authority. 1. Summary 1.1 This report introduces the following revised draft Local Plan policies, which are set out as appendices to this report: Appendix 1: Sites & Settlements Appendix 2: Strategic Sites Appendix 3: Affordable Housing Appendix 4: Green Infrastructure Appendix 5: Water Appendix 6: Climate Change Appendix 7: Design 1.2 The first recommendation is that they are endorsed for inclusion in the emerging Local Plan, subject to any comments made by the Planning Committee being addressed. This endorsement would also acknowledge that the policies may need further amendments prior to being incorporated into the whole document, in order to fit within other draft policies. Recommendations (2) and (3) also note that the complete draft Pre-Submission Local Plan will be reported to Planning Committee for consideration prior to final approval by the South Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA) for consultation.
  • Development Management (South) Committee

    Development Management (South) Committee

    Public Document Pack Email: [email protected] Direct line: 01403 215465 Development Management (South) Committee Tuesday, 15th November, 2016 at 2.30 pm Main Conference Room, Parkside, Chart Way, Horsham Councillors: Brian O'Connell (Chairman) Paul Clarke (Vice-Chairman) John Blackall Gordon Lindsay Jonathan Chowen Tim Lloyd Philip Circus Paul Marshall Roger Clarke Mike Morgan David Coldwell Kate Rowbottom Ray Dawe Jim Sanson Brian Donnelly Ben Staines David Jenkins Claire Vickers Nigel Jupp Michael Willett Liz Kitchen You are summoned to the meeting to transact the following business Agenda Page No. 1. Apologies for absence 2. Minutes 3 - 12 To approve as correct the minutes of the meeting held on 18th October 2016 3. Declarations of Members' Interests To receive any declarations of interest from Members of the Committee 4. Announcements To receive any announcements from the Chairman of the Committee or the Chief Executive To consider the following reports of the Development Manager and to take such action thereon as may be necessary: 5. Appeals 13 - 14 Horsham District Council, Parkside, Chart Way, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 1RL Telephone: 01403 215100 (calls may be recorded) Horsham.gov.uk Chief Executive – Tom Crowley Corporate & Democratic Services www.hastings.gov.uk/meetings 2 1 Applications for determination by Committee: 6. DC/16/2064 - Land North of The Rosary, Partridge Green (Ward: Cowfold, 15 - 34 Shermanbury & West Grinstead) Applicant: Mrs Elizabeth Tompkins 7. DC/16/1974 - Vine Cottage, Coolham Road, Coolham (Ward: Billingshurst 35 - 54 & Shipley) Applicant: Mr Jamie Coad 8. DC/16/1963 - High Chaparral, London Road, Washington (Ward: Chantry) 55 - 64 Applicant: Mr S Page 9.
  • Early Medieval Dykes (400 to 850 Ad)

    Early Medieval Dykes (400 to 850 Ad)

    EARLY MEDIEVAL DYKES (400 TO 850 AD) A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Erik Grigg School of Arts, Languages and Cultures Contents Table of figures ................................................................................................ 3 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 6 Declaration ...................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................... 9 1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY ................................................. 10 1.1 The history of dyke studies ................................................................. 13 1.2 The methodology used to analyse dykes ............................................ 26 2 THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DYKES ............................................. 36 2.1 Identification and classification ........................................................... 37 2.2 Tables ................................................................................................. 39 2.3 Probable early-medieval dykes ........................................................... 42 2.4 Possible early-medieval dykes ........................................................... 48 2.5 Probable rebuilt prehistoric or Roman dykes ...................................... 51 2.6 Probable reused prehistoric
  • SC1: South Coast Shoreline

    SC1: South Coast Shoreline

    Overall Character THE WEST SUSSEX LANDSCAPE Land Management Guidelines This long narrow Character Area extends between West Wittering and Shoreham and comprises the majority of the West Sussex coastline. It is a distinctive low, open and exposed landscape which has an overriding visual and physical association with the sea. Its wide and gently curved bays are further defined by the protruding shingle headland of Selsey Bill, and the chalk headland of Beachy Head in neighbouring East Sussex. This is a dynamic character area whose key characteristics are linked by coastal evolution, weather and tides. Sheet SC1 The character varies considerably according to weather condition and seasons. Key Characteristics G Relatively narrow undeveloped sections of coastline behind beaches. Bounded by low South Coast growing scant vegetation and small areas of wind-sculpted scrub and trees. Often G To the east of Selsey Bill, mainly shingle banks with bands of sand and mud exposed at providing separation of urban areas. Areas of both high ecological and landscape Shoreline low tide. importance. South Coast Plain G To the west of Selsey Bill, mainly sandy beaches, dry sand dunes and grassland habitats. G Shingle and sand dune habitats of national importance, notably at West Wittering, G Influence of extensive linear urban coastal resort development.To the east,almost Shoreham and Climping. The area covered by the Sheet is derived from: continuous conurbation of Bognor Regis, Littlehampton,Worthing and Shoreham.To the G Reed beds, streams and deep drainage ditches known as rifes. west, notably villages of West Wittering, East Wittering and Bracklesham. Separated by G Frequent wooden and rock groynes and breakwaters.
  • HEAP for Isle of Wight Rural Settlement

    HEAP for Isle of Wight Rural Settlement

    Isle of Wight Parks, Gardens & Other Designed Landscapes Historic Environment Action Plan Isle of Wight Gardens Trust: March 2015 2 Foreword The Isle of Wight landscape is recognised as a source of inspiration for the picturesque movement in tourism, art, literature and taste from the late 18th century but the particular significance of designed landscapes (parks and gardens) in this cultural movement is perhaps less widely appreciated. Evidence for ‘picturesque gardens’ still survives on the ground, particularly in the Undercliff. There is also evidence for many other types of designed landscapes including early gardens, landscape parks, 19th century town and suburban gardens and gardens of more recent date. In the 19th century the variety of the Island’s topography and the richness of its scenery, ranging from gentle cultivated landscapes to the picturesque and the sublime with views over both land and sea, resulted in the Isle of Wight being referred to as the ‘Garden of England’ or ‘Garden Isle’. Designed landscapes of all types have played a significant part in shaping the Island’s overall landscape character to the present day even where surviving design elements are fragmentary. Equally, it can be seen that various natural components of the Island’s landscape, in particular downland and coastal scenery, have been key influences on many of the designed landscapes which will be explored in this Historic Environment Action Plan (HEAP). It is therefore fitting that the HEAP is being prepared by the Isle of Wight Gardens Trust as part of the East Wight Landscape Partnership’s Down to the Coast Project, particularly since well over half of all the designed landscapes recorded on the Gardens Trust database fall within or adjacent to the project area.
  • Earnley Conservation Area Character Appraisal & Management Proposals

    Earnley Conservation Area Character Appraisal & Management Proposals

    EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL & MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS Originally published September 2006 with updated appendices March 2012 Approved by Cabinet: 7 May 2013 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA CHARACTER APPRAISAL & MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS On the 5th September 2006 Chichester District Council approved this document as planning guidance and therefore it will be a material consideration in the determination of relevant planning applications. Cover: Map of Earnley 1875 This document has been written and illustrated on behalf of Chichester District Council by: The Conservation Studio 1 Querns Lane Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 1RL Telephone: 01285 642428 email: [email protected] PART 1 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1 INTRODUCTION 2 LOCATION AND LANDSCAPE SETTING 2.1 Location 2.2 Topography 2.3 Relationship of the conservation area to its surroundings 2.4 Geology 2.5 Biodiversity 3 HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT AND ARCHAEOLOGY 3.1 Historic development 3.2 Surviving historic features 3.3 Archaeology 4 SPATIAL ANALYSIS 4.1 Character areas 4.2 Plan form, building types and boundaries 4.3 Open spaces, trees and views 5 DEFINITION OF THE SPECIAL INTEREST OF THE CONSERVATION AREA 5.1 Activities and uses 5.2 Listed buildings 5.3 Positive buildings 5.4 Building materials and colours 5.5 Public realm 6 ISSUES PART 2 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS 1 BACKGROUND 2 RECOMMENDATIONS 3 MONITORING AND REVIEW 4 CONTACT DETAILS APPENDICES Appendix 1 Legislative background Appendix 2 Community involvement Appendix 3 Good Practice Guidance Appendix 4 Draft Local List Criteria Appendix 5 Bibliography PART 1 EARNLEY CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL 1 INTRODUCTION This document has been produced for Chichester The Management Proposals make the following District Council following consultation with the local recommendations: community.
  • SUSSEX INDUSTRIAL Material for Both the Newsletter and Sussex Industrial History Is Always Welcome

    SUSSEX INDUSTRIAL Material for Both the Newsletter and Sussex Industrial History Is Always Welcome

    A NOTE TO CONTRIBUTORS SUSSEX INDUSTRIAL Material for both the Newsletter and Sussex Industrial History is always welcome. It would ARtHAEOLOCY SOCIEfY however make life easier if Registen!d ClIariIy No. 267159 i. contributions were typed or hand written with plenty of space between the lines. This enables editorial changes, often necessary to ensure a common style between articles, e.g. the way dates are written, to be clearly seen at the word processing stage. NEWSLETTER No. 80 ISSN 0263 516X ii. Members composing articles on their own wordprocessor are invited to submit with the text the disc from Which it is derived to avoid the need to enter the whole article again via Price 25p to non-Members OCTOBER 1993 the keyboard. This can save the Society cost. The editors would much appreciate co-operation in these matters. CHIEF CONTENTS Wealden Sandstone Quarry , ,ilitary /Defence SiteS in ~ussex:- OFFICERS ( I ~ The Ringmer Buffer Depot Underground Rotor Stations in Sussex President A.J. Haselfoot 'Black'lransmitter near Crow borough Chairman Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey, Home Farm, Herons Ghyll, Uckfield News from Amberley Museum Vice Chairman J.5.F. Blackwell, 21 Hythe Road, Brighton BN1 6]R (0273) 557674 Sussex Mills Group News General Sec: R.G. Martin, 42 Falmer Ave, Saltdean, Brighton, BN28FG (0273) 303805 Treasurer & J.M.H. Bevan, 12 Charmandean Rd, WortFiing BN14 9LB (0903) 235421 Membership Sec: PROGRAMME OF ACTIVITIES FOR 1993 Editor B. Austen, 1 Mercedes Cottages, St John's Rd, Haywards Heath RH16 4EH l' (0444) 413845 Saturday 23 October 7.30 p.m Members' evening with several short talks in Drama Room, Archivist P.J.
  • View Characterisation and Analysis

    View Characterisation and Analysis

    South Downs National Park: View Characterisation and Analysis Final Report Prepared by LUC on behalf of the South Downs National Park Authority November 2015 Project Title: 6298 SDNP View Characterisation and Analysis Client: South Downs National Park Authority Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by Director V1 12/8/15 Draft report R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern Swann V2 9/9/15 Final report R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern Swann V3 4/11/15 Minor changes to final R Knight, R R Knight K Ahern report Swann South Downs National Park: View Characterisation and Analysis Final Report Prepared by LUC on behalf of the South Downs National Park Authority November 2015 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Bristol Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Edinburgh London NW1 1JD Mapping & Visualisation [email protected] FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper LUC BRISTOL 12th Floor Colston Tower Colston Street Bristol BS1 4XE T +44 (0)117 929 1997 [email protected] LUC GLASGOW 37 Otago Street Glasgow G12 8JJ T +44 (0)141 334 9595 [email protected] LUC EDINBURGH 28 Stafford Street Edinburgh EH3 7BD T +44 (0)131 202 1616 [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 1 Background to the study 1 Aims and purpose 1 Outputs and uses 1 2 View patterns, representative views and visual sensitivity 4 Introduction 4 View
  • Sussex Archaeological Society

    Sussex Archaeological Society

    GB 1850 MS Collections Sussex Archaeological Society This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 41416 The National Archives NOTE ON ACCESS Searchers should note that to secure access to any of these collections they must first make an appointment with the honorary librarian of the Sussex Archaeological Society. Sussex Archaeological Society, Barbican House, 169 High Street, Lewes BN7 1YE Tel. 01273-486290. COLLECTIONS OF WORKING PAPERS - AUTHORS Allcroft, A. Hadrian Andrews, P.B.S. Attree, F.W.T. Barton, Kenneth J. Bax, Alfred R. Biggar, Joyce T. M. Blaauw, William Henry Bleach, John Booker, T. P.L. Bothamley, Henry W. Brackenbury, K.F. Buck land, L.A. Budgen, Walter Burstow, George Philip Chandler, Allan Child, F. Cooper, William Durrant Courthope, Daphne Crook, B.M. Curwen, Eliot & E. Cecil Davenport, W.S. De Candole, H. Dell, Richard Denman, John Domes, R.L. Dunk in, Edwin H.W. Farrant, John H. * Godfrey, Walter H. Grant ham, W.W. Gray, J.V. Grlnsell, Leslie V. Gunnis, Rupert Hannah, I. Hodson, Leonard J. Holden, Eric W. Holgate, M. S. Honeywood, W. Johnston, George D. Langdon, F.G. Leeney, 0.H. Long, A. Lovegrove, H. Lower, Mark Antony MacDermott, K.H. Machell-Cox, E. , Mannington, H. Marten (Martin) family (several members) Meads, W.E. Norris, N.E.S. Pullein, Catherine Remnant, G.L. Rice, R. Garraway Ross, T. Salt, Mary C.L. Salzman, Louis F. Shaw, Frank Sheppard, V. Simmonds, C. Smith, Verena Standen family Stevens, F. Bentham Straker, E. Style, - Tebbutt, C.F.
  • Walks & Strolls

    Walks & Strolls

    WALKS & STROLLS AUGUST - OCTOBER 2018 Dear Members, British Summer Time continues throughout this programme, so let’s use the long days to enjoy our walking and travelling. After a late start, early summer has been beautifully green, so we hope to see full harvests in due course. With our varied weather, plants and animals on the Downs have much to cope with each year and it’s interesting to see how they are affected. You’ll notice this time that several Saturdays do not have any of the longer walks. Several Saturday walks leaders have had health and/or age issues lately! They have mostly been covered by strolls on these days, which are particularly welcome. Thinking about strolls, sadly Peter Harris has found it necessary to say farewell as a strolls leader. We are most grateful for his contribution over the years, especially for his entertaining themed strolls, and hope we shall still see him out strolling from time to time. All your walk offers are valuable but arranging them suitably is not always easy. The same areas do seem to cluster. So it’s worked out that lunch at Burpham is popular - in successive walks. However they do cover quite different ground. And if some people had not been able to swap there would have been three. Let’s just call it “Love Burpham Week”! In general we are down on number of walks leaders. Ideally all walkers would take part in leading so there would be a large enough pool of leaders to cope with temporary unavailability.