General Chharacters and Classification of Osteichthyes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Chharacters and Classification of Osteichthyes GENERAL CHHARACTERS AND CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Subject – Zoology, Class - B.Sc. Part – II(Hons. and Subsi.) Paper – III(Hons.) & II(Subsi.) By:- KUNDAN PATEL Guest Faculty Department of Zoology, B.N. College, Patna INTRODUCTION The class Osteichthyes includes bony fishes with a wide range of variations in features. Fishes range from simple lobe-finned to ray- finned. They have certain common features but vary in certain characters like presence and types of scales. Size of fishes is also variable and some of the fishes are prominently known to us. Their abundance varies in different ecosystem depending upon their ecological needs. Let us see the general and identifying features of these fishes with the help of their classification. GENERAL CHARACTERS OF OSTEICHTHYES ● It includes both marine and fresh water fishes with bony endoskeleton ● The head and pectoral girdles are covered with large dermal bones ● Streamlined body with terminal mouth ● Have four pairs of gills which are covered by operculum on each side ● Skin is covered with cycloid or ctenoid scales ● They do not have placoid scales ● Heart is two-chambered and is cold-blooded GENERAL CHARACTERS OF OSTEICHTHYES ● The eyeball is supported by a sclerotic ring of four small bones ● The labyrinth in the inner ear contains large otoliths ● They have swim bladder which help the body to create a neutral balance between sinking and floating ● Sexes separate, fertilization usually external ● Mostly oviparous ● Development is direct ● E.g. – exocoetus(Flying fish), Hippocampus(Sea horse), Labeo(Rohu), Catla(Katla), Clarias(Magur), Betta(flying fish), Pterophyllum(Angel fish), etc. GENERAL CHARACTERS OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES The class Osteichthyes has bee classified into two subclasses as follows(Romer, 1966):- Subclass -1. Sarcopterygii:- ● Gr., sarcos = fleshy; pterygium = fin ● Paired fins leg-like or lobed, with a fleshy, bony central axis covered by scales ● Two dorsal fins, caudal fin heterocercal with an epichordal lobe ● Olfactory sacs usually connected to mouth cavity by internal nostrils or choanae ● Popularly called fleshy or lobe-finned or air breathing fish ● It has two orders:- CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Order – 1. Crossopterygii:- ● Gr, crossoi = a fringe; pteryx = fin ● Paired fins lobed covered with scales. Pectoral fins are supported by a jointed median axis bearing radials. Caudal fin three-lobed ● Scales covered by a layer of cosmine ● Premaxillae, maxillae and squamosal bones present ● Internal nares may or may not be present ● Spiracles present ● Air-bladder vestigial ● E.g. – Latimeria, Coelacanths(extinct), etc. CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Order – 2. Dipnoi:- ● Gr, di=double; pnoe=breathing ● Cycloid scales covering the skin ● Single gill-slit on either side present and covered by operculum ● Paired fins lobed ● Tail fin symmetrical(diphycercal) with no trace of separate dorsal fins ● Internal nares present opening into mouth; spiracles absent ● Air-bladder single or paired, lung-like ● Notochord remain as an unconstructed rod, vertebrae cartilaginous arches ● Premaxillae and maxillae absent ● Lower jaw(palate-quadrate) firmly fused to neurocranium(skull autostylic) ● Stomach absent, intestine ciliated, no hepatic caeca, spiral valve present ● Auricle partly divided into two, ventricle completely divided by a ridge ● Ventral aorta shortenedinto a spirally twisted muscular bulbus cordis provided with valves ● Pulmonary and systemic circulation separate ● Cleavage holoblastic ● E.g. – lung fishes(Neoceratodus, Protopterus and Lepidosiren) CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Sublass – 2. Actinopterygii:- ● Gr, actis=ray; pteryx=fin ● Includes all ray-finned fishes ● Paired fins thin, broad, without fleshy basal lobes and supported by dermal fin-rays ● Radials of paired fins not arranged biradially ● One dorsal fin may be divided ● Caudal fin without epichordal lobe ● Tail generally homocercal, in a few heterocercal or semi- heterocercal ● Scales either ganoid or reduced to thin horny structure or completely absent in some ● Gill-slits covered by operculum. Spiracles absent ● Olfactory sacs not connected to mouth cavity. Internal nares absent ● Squamous bone absent ● It has been classified into three superorders:- CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Superorder – 1. Chondrostei:- ● Primitive ray-finned fish or cartilaginous ganoids ● Tail fin heterocercal ● Scales usually ganoid ● Large mouth opening ● It has two orders:- Order – 1. Polypteriformes:- ● Typical rhomboid ganoid scales ● Dorsal fin of eight or more finlets ● Pectoral fins with a small prominent scale covered fleshy lobe ● Ossified skeleton ● Spiracles present ● Air-bladder bilobed opening into the intestine ventrally ● E.g. – Polypterus(Bichir) CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Order – 2. Acipenseriformes:- ● Body covered with five rows of bony scutes ● Snout elongated, having barbles on the ventral surface ● Caudal fin heterocercal ● Skeleton largely cartilaginous. Endocranium cartilaginous ● Jaws without teeth ● E.g. – Acipenser(Sturgeon), Polydon(Paddle-fish) Superorder – 2. Holostei:- ● Gr, holos=entire; osteon=bone ● Intermediate ray-finned fish, transitional between chondrostei and teleostei ● Ganoid or cycloid scales ● Tail fin heterocercal ● Mouth opening small CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSOrdTEICHTHYEer – 1. Amiiformes:- S ● Thin, overlapping cycloid scales ● Caudal fin heterocercal ● Long dorsal fin ● Pectoral radials are attached to the scapulocoracoid cartilage ● Vertebral centra non-opisthocoelous ● Premaxillary not protractile, firmly articulated with the cranium ● Snout normal rounded ● Spiracles and clavicles are absent ● Presence of a single swim-bladder ● E.g. – Amia(Bowfin) Order – 2. Semionotiformes or Lepidosteiformes:- ● Scales rhomboidal ganoid and in oblique rows ● Body elongated ● Nasal opening at the end of much elongated snout ● Caudal fin heterocercal ● Vertebrae completely ossified and opisthocoelous ● Air-bladder cellular ● E.g. – Lepidosteus or Lepisosteus(Garpike) CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Superorder –3. Teleostei:- ● Gr., teleos=complete; ostgon=bone ● Scales cycloid, ctenoid or absent ● Mouth terminal, small ● Tail fin mostly heterocercal ● Endoskeleton bony ● Single external gill-slit on each side of the head covered by operculum ● Cloaca and claspers absent ● Air-bladder usually present ● Spiracle is lost ● Spiral valve in the intestine absent ● Conus arteriosus greatly reduced but there is an enlarged bulbus arteriosus ● Advanced or modern ray-finned fishes CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Order – 1. Clupeiformes:- ● Scales cycloid and well developed ● Head and operculum not scaled ● Single dorsal and small ventral fin without spines ● Ventral fin may be absent ● Pelvic fins abdominal ● Caudal fin homocercal ● Air-bladder communicate with the pharynx ● Vertebral centra completely ossified ● Weberian apparatus absent ● E.g. – Clupea(herringer), Salmo(Atlantic salmon), Sardinops(Pacific sardine), Notopterus(Chital fish), Gadusia, Ilisha, etc. CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Order – 2. Scopeliformes:- ● Deep sea fishes having phosphorescent organs ● Dorsal and anal fins without spines. An adipose fin present ● Mouth wide and provided with numerous small teeth ● Air-bladder absent ● E.g. – Harpodon(Mumbai duck) Order– 3. Cypriniformes:- ● Fins either without spines or dorsal, anal and pectoral have a spine each ● Ventral(pelvic) fins abdominal ● Air-bladder connected with the pharynx by a duct ● A peculiar Weberian apparatus, connecting the internal ear with the air- bladder, present ● Body covered with scales or naked ● E.g. – Labeo(Rohu), Cirrhina, Botia, Cyprinus(Carp), Puntius, Tor, Heteropneustes(Singhi), Calrius(Magur), Wallago(Lachi), Mystus(Tengra), etc. CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Order – 4. Anguiliformes:- ● Body elongated eel-like or snake-like ● Scales vestigial or absent ● Dorsal and anal fins long and confluent behind ● Pelvic fins, if present, abdominal ● Fins devoid of spines ● Air-bladder with duct ● E.g. – Anguilla(Freshwater eel), Muraena(Moray) Order – 5. Beloniformes:- ● Body elongated, covered with cycloid scales ● Fins without spines pectoral fins large and high on body ● Ventral(pelvic) fins abdominal ● Some of them are capable of jumping into the air and glide with the help of enlarged pectoral fins ● E.g. – Belone or Xenentodon(Garfish), Hemiramphus(Half beak), Exocoetus and Cypselurus(Flying fishes) CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEICHTHYES Order – 6. Syngnathiformes:- ● Body covered with protective layer of scales or bony rings ● Snout tubular with suctorial mouth ● Pectoral fins small, pelvics absent and a single dorsal fin present ● Fin-rays of dorsal, pectoral and pelvic fins not branched ● Tail prehensile in sea horse, but not in pipe fish ● Air-bladder closed ● Males possess brood pouch for the development of the young ● Physoclistic ● E.g. – Hippocampus(Sea horse), Fistularia(Flute fish), Syngnathus(Pipe fish) Order – 7. Ophiocephaliformes or Channiformes:- ● Body covered with cycloid scales ● Head depressed, covered with plate-like scales ● Fins without spines ● Air-bladder very long and without duct ● Accessory respiratory organs present ● Physoclistic ● E.g. – Ophiocephalus or Channa(Snake head fish) CLASSIFICATION
Recommended publications
  • European Anchovy Engraulis Encrasicolus (Linnaeus, 1758) From
    European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus (Linnaeus, 1758) from the Gulf of Annaba, east Algeria: age, growth, spawning period, condition factor and mortality Nadira Benchikh, Assia Diaf, Souad Ladaimia, Fatma Z. Bouhali, Amina Dahel, Abdallah B. Djebar Laboratory of Ecobiology of Marine and Littoral Environments, Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Science, University of Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria. Corresponding author: N. Benchikh, [email protected] Abstract. Age, growth, spawning period, condition factor and mortality were determined in the European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus populated the Gulf of Annaba, east Algeria. The age structure of the total population is composed of 59.1% females, 33.5% males and 7.4% undetermined. The size frequency distribution method shows the existence of 4 cohorts with lengths ranging from 8.87 to 16.56 cm with a predominance of age group 3 which represents 69.73% followed by groups 4, 2 and 1 with respectively 19.73, 9.66 and 0.88%. The VONBIT software package allowed us to estimate the growth parameters: asymptotic length L∞ = 17.89 cm, growth rate K = 0.6 year-1 and t0 = -0.008. The theoretical maximum age or tmax is 4.92 years. The height-weight relationship shows that growth for the total population is a major allometry. Spawning takes place in May, with a gonado-somatic index (GSI) of 4.28% and an annual mean condition factor (K) of 0.72. The total mortality (Z), natural mortality (M) and fishing mortality (F) are 2.31, 0.56 and 1.75 year-1 respectively, with exploitation rate E = F/Z is 0.76 is higher than the optimal exploitation level of 0.5.
    [Show full text]
  • How Fishes Breath
    How fishes breath • Respiration in fish or in that of any organism that lives in the water is very different from that of human beings. Organisms like fish, which live in water, need oxygen to breathe so that their cells can maintain their living state. To perform their respiratory function, fish have specialized organs that help them inhale oxygen dissolved in water. • Respiration in fish takes with the help of gills. Most fish possess gills on either side of their head. Gills are tissues made up of feathery structures called gill filaments that provide a large surface area for gas exchange. A large surface area is crucial for gas exchange in aquatic organisms as water contains very little amount of dissolved oxygen. The filaments in fish gills are arranged in rows in the gill arch. Each filament contains lamellae, which are discs supplied with capillaries. Blood enters and leaves the gills through these small blood vessels. Although gills in fish occupy only a small section of their body, the immense respiratory surface created by the filaments provides the whole organism with an efficient gas exchange. • Some fish, like sharks and lampreys, possess multiple gill openings. However, bony fish like Rohu, have a single gill opening on each side. Bony fish (, Osteichthyes ) • . Greek for bone fish, Osteichthyes includes all bony fishes, and given the diversity of animals found in the world's oceans, it should come as no surprise that it is the largest of all vertebrate classes. There are nearly 28,000 members of Osteichthyes currently found on Earth, and numerous extinct species found in fossil form.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi
    Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 (http://www.accessscience.com/) Article by: Boschung, Herbert Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Gardiner, Brian Linnean Society of London, Burlington House, Piccadilly, London, United Kingdom. Publication year: 2014 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.680400) Content Morphology Euteleostei Bibliography Phylogeny Classification Additional Readings Clupeomorpha and Ostariophysi The most recent group of actinopterygians (rayfin fishes), first appearing in the Upper Triassic (Fig. 1). About 26,840 species are contained within the Teleostei, accounting for more than half of all living vertebrates and over 96% of all living fishes. Teleosts comprise 517 families, of which 69 are extinct, leaving 448 extant families; of these, about 43% have no fossil record. See also: Actinopterygii (/content/actinopterygii/009100); Osteichthyes (/content/osteichthyes/478500) Fig. 1 Cladogram showing the relationships of the extant teleosts with the other extant actinopterygians. (J. S. Nelson, Fishes of the World, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, 2006) 1 of 9 10/7/2015 1:07 PM Teleostei - AccessScience from McGraw-Hill Education http://www.accessscience.com/content/teleostei/680400 Morphology Much of the evidence for teleost monophyly (evolving from a common ancestral form) and relationships comes from the caudal skeleton and concomitant acquisition of a homocercal tail (upper and lower lobes of the caudal fin are symmetrical). This type of tail primitively results from an ontogenetic fusion of centra (bodies of vertebrae) and the possession of paired bracing bones located bilaterally along the dorsal region of the caudal skeleton, derived ontogenetically from the neural arches (uroneurals) of the ural (tail) centra.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ventricles
    Guest Editorial Evolution of the Ventricles Solomon Victor, FRCS, FRCP We studied the evolution of ventricles by macroscopic examination of the hearts of Vijaya M. Nayak, MS marine cartilaginous and bony fish, and by angiocardiography and gross examination of Raveen Rajasingh, MPhil the hearts of air-breathing freshwater fish, frogs, turtles, snakes, and crocodiles. A right-sided, thin-walled ventricular lumen is seen in the fish, frog, turtle, and snake. In fish, there is external symmetry of the ventricle, internal asymmetry, and a thick- walled left ventricle with a small inlet chamber. In animals such as frogs, turtles, and snakes, the left ventricle exists as a small-cavitied contractile sponge. The high pressure generated by this spongy left ventricle, the direction of the jet, the ventriculoarterial ori- entation, and the bulbar spiral valve in the frog help to separate the systemic and pul- monary circulations. In the crocodile, the right aorta is connected to the left ventricle, and there is a complete interventricular septum and an improved left ventricular lumen when compared with turtles and snakes. The heart is housed in a rigid pericardial cavity in the shark, possibly to protect it from changing underwater pressure. The pericardial cavity in various species permits move- ments of the heart-which vary depending on the ventriculoarterial orientation and need for the ventricle to generate torque or spin on the ejected blood- that favor run-off into the appropriate arteries and their branches. In the lower species, it is not clear whether the spongy myocardium contributes to myocardial oxygenation. In human beings, spongy myocardium constitutes a rare form of congenital heart disease.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS 345 Ichthyology
    ESS 345 Ichthyology Evolutionary history of fishes 12 Feb 2019 (Who’s birthday?) Quote of the Day: We must, however, acknowledge, as it seems to me, that man with all his noble qualities... still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin._______, (1809-1882) Evolution/radiation of fishes over time Era Cenozoic Fig 13.1 Fishes are the most primitive vertebrate and last common ancestor to all vertebrates They start the branch from all other living things with vertebrae and a cranium Chordata Notochord Dorsal hollow nerve cord Pharyngeal gill slits Postanal tail Urochordata Cephalochordata Craniates (mostly Vertebrata) Phylum Chordata sister is… Echinodermata Synapomorphy – They are deuterostomes Fish Evolutionary Tree – evolutionary innovations in vertebrate history Sarcopterygii Chondrichthyes Actinopterygii (fish) For extant fishes Osteichthyes Gnathostomata Handout Vertebrata Craniata Figure only from Berkeley.edu Hypothesis of fish (vert) origins Background 570 MYA – first large radiation of multicellular life – Fossils of the Burgess Shale – Called the Cambrian explosion Garstang Hypothesis 1928 Neoteny of sessile invertebrates Mistake that was “good” Mudpuppy First Vertebrates Vertebrates appear shortly after Cambrian explosion, 530 MYA – Conodonts Notochord replaced by segmented or partially segmented vertebrate and brain is enclosed in cranium Phylogenetic tree Echinoderms, et al. Other “inverts” Vertebrate phyla X Protostomes Deuterostomes Nephrozoa – bilateral animals First fishes were jawless appearing
    [Show full text]
  • Function of the Respiratory System - General
    Lesson 27 Lesson Outline: Evolution of Respiratory Mechanisms – Cutaneous Exchange • Evolution of Respiratory Mechanisms - Water Breathers o Origin of pharyngeal slits from corner of mouth o Origin of skeletal support/ origin of jaws o Presence of strainers o Origin of gills o Gill coverings • Form - Water Breathers o Structure of Gills Chondrichthyes Osteichthyes • Function – Water Breathers o Pumping action and path of water flow Chondrichthyes Osteichthyes Objectives: At the end of this lesson you should be able to: • Describe the evolutionary trends seen in respiratory mechanisms in water breathers • Describe the structure of the different types of gills found in water breathers • Describe the pumping mechanisms used to move water over the gills in water breathers References: Chapter 13: pgs 292-313 Reading for Next Lesson: Chapter 13: pgs 292-313 Function of the Respiratory System - General Respiratory Organs Cutaneous Exchange Gas exchange across the skin takes place in many vertebrates in both air and water. All that is required is a good capillary supply, a thin exchange barrier and a moist outer surface. As you will remember from lectures on the integumentary system, this is often in conflict with the other functions of the integument. Cutaneous respiration is utilized most extensively in amphibians but is not uncommon in fish and reptiles. It is not used extensively in birds or mammals, although there are instances where it can play an important role (bats loose 12% of their CO2 this way). For the most part, it: - plays a larger role in smaller animals (some small salamanders are lungless). - requires a moist skin which is thin, has a high capillary density and no thick keratinised outer layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Fintastic Sharks and Rays Lesson and Activity Packet
    Florida's Fintastic Sharks and Rays An at-home lesson for grades 3-5 Produced by: This educational workbook was produced through the support of the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program. 1 What are sharks and rays? Believe it or not, they’re a type of fish! When you think “fish,” you probably picture a trout or tuna, but fishes come in all shapes and sizes. All fishes share the following key characteristics that classify them into this group: Fishes have the simplest of vertebrate hearts with only two chambers- one atrium and one ventricle. The spine in a fish runs down the middle of its back just like ours, making fish vertebrates. All fishes have skeletons, but not all fish skeletons are made out of bones. Some fishes have skeletons made out of cartilage, just like your nose and ears. Fishes are cold-blooded. Cold-blooded animals use their environment to warm up or cool down. Fins help fish swim. Fins come in pairs, like pectoral and pelvic fins or are singular, like caudal or anal fins. Later in this packet, we will look at the different types of fins that fishes have and some of the unique ways they are used. 2 Placoid Ctenoid Ganoid Cycloid Hard protective scales cover the skin of many fish species. Scales can act as “fingerprints” to help identify some fish species. There are several different scale types found in bony fishes, including cycloid (round), ganoid (rectangular or diamond), and ctenoid (scalloped). Cartilaginous fishes have dermal denticles (Placoid) that resemble tiny teeth on their skin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physiological Response of Port Jackson Sharks and Australian Swellsharks to Sedation, Gill-Net Capture, and Repeated Sampling in Captivity
    SEDAR21-RD-19 North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:127–139, 2009 [Article] Ó Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2009 DOI: 10.1577/M08-031.1 The Physiological Response of Port Jackson Sharks and Australian Swellsharks to Sedation, Gill-Net Capture, and Repeated Sampling in Captivity LORENZ H. FRICK AND RICHARD D. REINA* School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia TERENCE I. WALKER Department of Primary Industries, Queenscliff Centre, Marine and Freshwater Fisheries Research Institute, 2a Bellarine Highway, Queenscliff, Victoria 3225, Australia Abstract.—Studying postrelease effects of fisheries capture on chondrichthyans in the wild poses considerable logistical challenges. We report a laboratory-based technique to (1) simulate gill-net capture of sharks, which allows monitoring the condition of animals during recovery from a controlled capture event, and (2) assess effects of sedation, serial blood sampling, and repeated exposure to experimental treatment on stress-related blood variables. Exposing Port Jackson sharks Heterodontus portusjacksoni and Australian swellsharks Cephaloscyllium laticeps to 30 min of simulated gill-net capture elicited behavioral stress (struggling and elevated ventilation rate) and minor physiological stress (elevated plasma lactate) responses but did not cause any mortality. Sedation of Australian swellsharks affected some stress-related blood variables. Repeated handling of Port Jackson sharks and Australian swellsharks at short intervals may result in elevated stress levels, but repeated exposure to simulated capture does not affect the physiological response of these two species to the treatment. Overall, the results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of simulated capture events as a technique to investigate the physiological response of sharks to capture stress.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiracular Air Breathing in Polypterid Fishes and Its Implications for Aerial
    ARTICLE Received 1 May 2013 | Accepted 27 Nov 2013 | Published 23 Jan 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4022 Spiracular air breathing in polypterid fishes and its implications for aerial respiration in stem tetrapods Jeffrey B. Graham1, Nicholas C. Wegner1,2, Lauren A. Miller1, Corey J. Jew1, N Chin Lai1,3, Rachel M. Berquist4, Lawrence R. Frank4 & John A. Long5,6 The polypterids (bichirs and ropefish) are extant basal actinopterygian (ray-finned) fishes that breathe air and share similarities with extant lobe-finned sarcopterygians (lungfishes and tetrapods) in lung structure. They are also similar to some fossil sarcopterygians, including stem tetrapods, in having large paired openings (spiracles) on top of their head. The role of spiracles in polypterid respiration has been unclear, with early reports suggesting that polypterids could inhale air through the spiracles, while later reports have largely dismissed such observations. Here we resolve the 100-year-old mystery by presenting structural, behavioural, video, kinematic and pressure data that show spiracle-mediated aspiration accounts for up to 93% of all air breaths in four species of Polypterus. Similarity in the size and position of polypterid spiracles with those of some stem tetrapods suggests that spiracular air breathing may have been an important respiratory strategy during the fish-tetrapod transition from water to land. 1 Marine Biology Research Division, Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA. 2 Fisheries Resource Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. 3 VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California 92161, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
    New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Pattern of Sushi Product Misdescription in Italy—A Crosstalk Between Citizen Science and DNA Barcoding
    foods Article Geographic Pattern of Sushi Product Misdescription in Italy—A Crosstalk between Citizen Science and DNA Barcoding Anna Maria Pappalardo *, Alessandra Raffa, Giada Santa Calogero and Venera Ferrito Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Section of Animal Biology “M. La Greca”, University of Catania, Via Androne 81, 95124 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (A.R.); [email protected] (G.S.C.); [email protected] (V.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: + 39-095-730-6051 Abstract: The food safety of sushi and the health of consumers are currently of high concern for food safety agencies across the world due to the globally widespread consumption of these products. The microbiological and toxicological risks derived from the consumption of raw fish and seafood have been highlighted worldwide, while the practice of species substitution in sushi products has attracted the interest of researchers more than food safety agencies. In this study, samples of sushi were processed for species authentication using the Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) gene as a DNA barcode. The approach of Citizen Science was used to obtain the sushi samples by involving people from eighteen different Italian cities (Northern, Central and Southern Italy). The results indicate that a considerable rate of species substitution exists with a percentage of misdescription ranging from 31.8% in Northern Italy to 40% in Central Italy. The species most affected by replacement was Thunnus thynnus followed by the flying fish roe substituted by eggs of Mallotus villosus. These results Citation: Pappalardo, A.M.; indicate that a standardization of fish market names should be realized at the international level Raffa, A.; Calogero, G.S.; Ferrito, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Last Meal Reflects Spiral-Shaped Intestine 6 January 2016
    Last meal reflects spiral-shaped intestine 6 January 2016 performed statistical analyses that revealed unknown patterns of distribution of the intestinal structure", explains Marcelo Sánchez. All of this led to the finding that Saurichthys had a straight stomach and a spiral valve. Energetic lifestyle The findings by the Zurich-based paleontologists unveil previously unexpected convergences with the gastrointestinal anatomy of present-day sharks and rays. "The anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract of Saurichthys, in particular the many windings in Extinct predatory fish Saurichthys. Credit: UZH the spiral valve, show the most original digestion organs of earlier fishes", says Thodoris Argyriou, a PhD student at the Paleontological Institute and Museum of the University of Zurich. The spiral A last meal provides new insights: The fossilized valve of Saurichthys indicates an energy-laden food remains of the extinct predatory fish lifestyle that was adjusted to the predatory and Saurichthys reflect its spiral-shaped intestine. The reproductive behavior of the genus. "The large spiral valve in fossils from Southern Switzerland is number of windings increased the surface area for similar to that of sharks and rays. Paleontologists digestion, which is sure to have provided the fish from the University of Zurich have thus closed a with more energy", says Thodoris Argyriou. gap in the knowledge concerning the evolution of the gastrointestinal tract in vertebrates. More information: Thodoris Argyriou et al. Exceptional preservation reveals gastrointestinal A last supper has provided some interesting anatomy and evolution in early actinopterygian findings. The digested and undigested remains of fishes, Scientific Reports (2016). DOI: the last meal eaten by a Saurichthys, a Triassic 10.1038/srep18758 bony fish, were discovered in a extraordinary case of preservation that paleontologists at the University of Zurich were quick to take advantage of.
    [Show full text]