DOCSLIB.ORG

Determining the Social and Psychological Reasons for the Emergence of Parkour and Free Running – an Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Determining the Social and Psychological Reasons for the Emergence of Parkour and Free Running – an Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis DETERMINING THE SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL REASONS FOR THE EMERGENCE OF PARKOUR AND FREE RUNNING – AN INTERPRETIVE PHENOMENOLOGICAL ANALYSIS. MATHEW BRENDAN PAUL WALLACE DOCTORATE OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD, SALFORD, MANCHESTER, UK SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES OCTOBER 2013 Content ________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS PAGE CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 - Introduction...................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2 - Literature Review........................................................................................13 Overview.................................................................................................................................13 2.1 - Extreme Sports................................................................................................................13 2.2 - Literature on Parkour and Free Running.........................................................................14 2.2.1 - What is Parkour........................................................................................................15 2.2.2 - Parkour Origins.........................................................................................................16 2.2.3 - The Development of Parkour and Free Running......................................................16 2.2.4 - Environmentalism and Transcendentalism...............................................................17 2.2.5 - Parkour Training and Practise..................................................................................18 2.2.6 - Meanings and Motivations.......................................................................................19 2.2.7 - Belonging..................................................................................................................21 2.2.8 - Pure Play Spirit.........................................................................................................22 2.2.9 - Flow..........................................................................................................................23 2.2.10 - Aesthetics...............................................................................................................23 2.2.11 - Standardisation, Regulation and Sportisation........................................................25 2.2.12 - Globalisation..........................................................................................................26 2.2.13 - Reinventing the Use of City Space .......................................................................27 2.2.14 - Resistance..............................................................................................................29 2.3 - Psychological Considerations.......................................................................................30 ___________________________________________________________________ i Content ________________________________________________________________ 2.3.1 - Personality..............................................................................................................30 2.3.2 - Meaning and Motivation........................................................................................31 2.3.3 - Dangerous Sports and Flow...................................................................................32 2.4 - Sociological Considerations.........................................................................................33 2.4.1 - Professional Sport..................................................................................................33 2.4.2 - Post Sport...............................................................................................................34 2.4.3 - Subculture Identity and Status...............................................................................35 2.4.4 - Globalisation...........................................................................................................36 2.4.5 - The Commodification of Extreme Sport................................................................37 2.4.6 - Counter Culture and the Media................................................ ..............................38 2.4.7 - Authenticity in Extreme Sport................................................................................39 2.4.8 - Resistance................................................................................................................40 Summary.................................................................................................................................41 CHAPTER 3 - Methodology.................................................................................................42 Overview.................................................................................................................................42 3.1 - Exploring Parkour and Free Running: A Qualitative Research Approach.....................42 3.1.1 - Legitimising Qualitative Research...........................................................................43 3.1.2 - Evaluating Qualitative Research Techniques...........................................................45 3.1.3 - Questionnaires..........................................................................................................45 3.1.4 - Focus Group.............................................................................................................45 3.1.5 - Face to Face Semi-Structured Interviews................................................................46 3.1.6 - Behavioural Observations........................................................................................48 ___________________________________________________________________ ii Content ________________________________________________________________ 3.2 - The Chosen Method of Data Generation/Information Analysis: Phenomenology.........49 3.2.1 - Procedure: IPA..........................................................................................................53 3.2.2 - The Structural Process of Phenomenology: familiarisation process.........................54 3.2.3 - Systematic Production of Themes and Clusters........................................................54 3.2.4 - Systematic Overview................................................................................................55 3.2.5 - Master Themes..........................................................................................................56 3.2.6 - Integrating Themes...................................................................................................57 3.2.7 - Validation.................................................................................................................57 3.2.8 - Pilot Study................................................................................................................57 3.3 - Emerging Considerations and Key Issues.......................................................................58 3.3.1 - Questions...................................................................................................................59 3.3.2 - Interviews..................................................................................................................63 3.3.3 - Setting.......................................................................................................................64 3.3.4 - Ethics.........................................................................................................................65 3.3.5 - Transcribing the Data................................................................................................65 Summary..................................................................................................................................66 CHAPTER 4 - Analysis One.................................................................................................67 Overview................................................................................................................................67 4.1 - Familiarisation Process.................................................................................................68 4.1.1 - Participant A............................................................................................................69 4.1.2 - Participant B............................................................................................................75 4.1.3 - Participant C............................................................................................................79 ___________________________________________________________________ iii Content ________________________________________________________________ 4.2 - Systematic Production of Themes and Clusters...........................................................86 4.2.1 - Participant A...........................................................................................................87 4.2.2 - Participant B...........................................................................................................96 4.2.3 - Participant C..........................................................................................................101 4.3 - Identifying Themes......................................................................................................107 4.3.1 - Participant A..........................................................................................................108
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Frjáls Eins Og Fuglinn Fljúgandi Parkour Og Freerunning: Bráð Lífshætta Eða Nýr Borgarlífsstíll?
    Frjáls eins og fuglinn fljúgandi Parkour og Freerunning: Bráð lífshætta eða nýr borgarlífsstíll? Íris Arthúrsdóttir Lokaverkefni til BA–gráðu í þjóðfræði Félagsvísindasvið Frjáls eins og fuglinn fljúgandi Parkour og Freerunning: Bráð lífshætta eða nýr borgarlífsstíll Íris Arthúrsdóttir Lokaverkefni til BA–gráðu í þjóðfræði Leiðbeinandi: Terry Gunnell Félags- og mannvísindadeild Félagsvísindasvið Háskóla Íslands Febrúar 2013 Ritgerð þessi er lokaverkefni til BA–gráðu í þjóðfræði og er óheimilt að afrita ritgerðina á nokkurn hátt nema með leyfi rétthafa. © Íris Arthúrsdóttir Reykjavík, Ísland 2013 Formáli Þessi ritgerð er tileinkuð sonum mínum Róberti Leó, Sigurði Ívari og Daníel Þorgeiri, en þeirra menningarheimur hefur verið minn helsti hugmyndabanki að áhugaverðum verkefnum á námsferlinum. Þeir hafa auk þess reynst móður sinni haukar í horni og aðstoðað dyggilega við hin ýmsu rannsóknarverkefni sem hefðu án þeirra íhlutunar verið illframkvæmanleg. Þið eruð sólargeislar lífs míns...takk. Akranes 23. Janúar, 2013 Íris Arthúrsdóttir 4 Útdráttur Í þessari BA-ritgerð í þjóðfræði er fjallað um hið nýtilkomna sport parkour og reynt að varpa ljósi á það með fjölbreyttum hætti út frá þjóðfræðilegu sjónarhorni. Ritgerðinni er skipt í sex hluta en í fyrsta kafla er stiklað á því helsta í rannsóknum á þjóðfræði barna og unglinga, rakin aðferðafræði rannsóknarinnar og viðmælendur kynntir til sögunnar. Í öðrum kafla er viðfangsefnið síðan sett í samhengi við hugtök og kenningar fræðimanna og er þar helst að nefna Johan Huizinga, Victor Turner, Alan Dundes og Michel de Certeau. Í kafla þrjú er sjónum beint að skilgreiningum á parkour auk þess sem skýrt er frá uppruna þess og þróun erlendis. Þar er að sama skapi hugað að útbreiðslu sportsins og hnattvæðingar með tilliti til aðkomu dægurmenningar og veraldarvefsins.
    [Show full text]
  • Kort Introduktion Til Parkour Og Freerunning
    Kort introduktion til Parkour og Freerunning Parkour 'Parkour' eller 'Le Parkour' er en bevægelsesaktivitet, som handler om at udvikle sig fysisk og mentalt gennem naturlige og ekspressive bevægelser. Den grundlæggende ide bag bevægelserne er at bevæge sig gennem omgivelserne hurtigt og effektivt i flow, dvs. at komme fra punkt A til B, mest effektivt og hurtigst muligt, udelukkende ved brug af kroppen. Miljøet er oftest bymæssigt. Bygninger, gelænder, vægge anvendes til fremdrift på en alternativ måde. Det handler om at se udfordring og muligheder der hvor andre ser begrænsninger og funktionalitet. Parkourudøverne kaldes ’traceurs’, hvilket kan oversættes til projektil eller kugle, som henleder til udøvernes kontinuerlige bevægelser. En rigtig traceur har gjort parkour til en central del af hans livsstil, og lever derved efter filosofien om at opleve frihed. Parkour startede som en subkultur, der udviklede sig i de franske forstæder, men har siden spredt sig ud i hele verden via Internettet. Oprindelse Franskmanden David Belle betegnes som grundlæggeren af parkour. Belles far, Raymond Belle, var løjtnant i Vietnamkrigen. Til at træne sine soldater til at bevæge sig effektivt rundt i junglen, anvendte han træningssystemet ’methode naturalle1’, der grundlagdes af Georg Hébert (1875- 1957).2 Methode naturelle er kort fortalt et system af filosofiske idéer og fysiske metoder, der ontologisk knytter sig til Jean-Jacques Rousseaus (1712-1778) og Johan Gutsmuths (1759-1839) filantropiske tanker om at vende tilbage til naturen og dannelse af det hele menneske3. Systemet bygger på en holistisk verdensforståelse, og tager udgangspunkt i effektivitet, flow og hurtighed.4 Raymond Belle introducerede David Belle for ideerne bag dette træningssystem, hvilket han tog med ud på gaderne i de franske forstæder.
    [Show full text]
  • Informacion Extra
    INFORMACION EXTRA Dani Sampayo | www.umparkour.com A principios de los 80, en Evry y Lisses (barriadas de París), surgió un movimiento. Un grupo de jóvenes motivados y adiestrados por Raymond Belle (ex-soldado vietnamita, y del cuerpo de bomberos francés instruido en el Método Natural de George Hébert), entrena y se prepara físicamente, inspirados en la aplicación del Método Natural en el ámbito urbano, con una idea principal: Ser fuertes para ayudar y proteger a sus familias. Llamaron a este movimiento principal “El arte del desplazamiento”, y al grupo que formaban, David Belle, Châu Belle-Dinh, Williams Belle, Yann Hnautra, Laurent Pimontesi, Séastien Foucan entre otros, “Yamakasi”, que proviene del Lingala (Ya makási), una lengua africana, y significa "Cuerpo fuerte, espíritu fuerte, persona fuerte". El deporte, que ellos convirtieron en disciplina, consiste en preparar el cuerpo y mente, para desplazarse por cualquier entorno, ya sea urbano o natural, de una manera eficiente, fuerte, rápida y bella. Para ello se valen de saltos, carreras, movimientos sobre obstáculos, equilibrios… Como auténticos animales, sin pararse ante ningún obstáculo, todo puede ser superado. Esta misma filosofía de entrenamiento, es también aplicada a la vida, lo que hace que este arte, el arte del desplazamiento, sea también un arte de vivir, sea una filosofía de vida sobre la que priman unos valores familiares, de hermandad, de respeto, de coraje, de lucha, y autosuperación. Después de un tiempo, hubo diferencias entre algunos de los miembros del grupo, y dos de sus integrantes más famosos, David Belle y Sébastien Foucan decidieron separarse, y buscando en primera instancia un mismo camino, decidieron renombrar el arte del desplazamiento, y llamar a lo que ellos hacían, “Parkour” (recorrido en francés), y de esta forma acoger y entrenar a nuevos jóvenes interesados en la disciplina, y poco a poco hacer que su Parkour se fuese haciendo más conocido entre la gente que sentía curiosidad.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Social and Psychological Reasons for the Emergence of Parkour and Free Running – an Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis Dr
    International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences IJBAS-IJENS Vol:15 No:02 34 Determining The Social and Psychological Reasons for The Emergence of Parkour and Free Running – An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis Dr. Mathew Wallace Girne American University, University Drive, Head of Sport Recreation North Cyprus via Mersin 10 Turkey [email protected] 0090 533 853 4877 Dr. RukiyeKilili Girne American University, University Drive, Tourism and Hospitality Management, North Cyprus via Mersin 10 Turkey [email protected] 0090 533 834 8510 Abstract-- Parkour and free running are newly emerged high Index Term-- Parkour, free running, self-improvement, risk urbanised activities still relatively understudied. They don’t endurance, discipline, strength, Flexibility and balance. appear to be subject to rules and regulations with aims and objectives being unclear. There are no distinct signs of competition and yet competitors are extremely trained, highly 1 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE ordered, thriving on the danger and adrenaline participation produces. The participants perform dangerous gymnastic It was discovered during the planning and evaluation stage movements utilising awkward obstacles without the use of that parkour and free running were new urbanised activities protective clothing and don’t appear to be concerned with the that had few or no rules at all. No one appeared to be welfare of people in the vicinity. The activities are associated controlling the flow of the activities with aims and objectives with self-improvement, endurance, discipline, strength, flexibility being unclear (The Independent, 11th November 2008). There and balance. Parkour and free running videos are frequently were no obvious signs of competition and yet competitors posted on the self-broadcast website, YouTube.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephanie Hemelryk Donald Is Australian Research Council Future Fellow and Professor of Comparative Film and Cultural Studies at the University of New South Wales
    P1: KAE Trim: 156mm 234mm Top: 36pt Gutter: 50pt × IBBK090-FM Vecchio May 26, 2014 17:1 Stephanie Hemelryk Donald is Australian Research Council Future Fellow and Professor of Comparative Film and Cultural Studies at the University of New South Wales. Christoph Lindner is Professor of Media and Culture and Director of the Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis at the University of Amsterdam. P1: KAE Trim: 156mm 234mm Top: 36pt Gutter: 50pt × IBBK090-FM Vecchio May 26, 2014 17:1 P1: KAE Trim: 156mm 234mm Top: 36pt Gutter: 50pt × IBBK090-FM Vecchio May 26, 2014 17:1 Inert Cities Globalization, Mobility and Suspension in Visual Culture Edited by Stephanie Hemelryk Donald and Christoph Lindner P1: KAE Trim: 156mm 234mm Top: 36pt Gutter: 50pt × IBBK090-FM Vecchio May 26, 2014 17:1 Published in 2015 by I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd 6SalemRoad,LondonW24BU 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 www.ibtauris.com Distributed in the United States and Canada Exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010 Copyright © Stephanie Hemelryk Donald and Christoph Lindner, 2014 The right of contributors to be identifed as the authors of this work has been asserted by authors in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or any part thereof, may not be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of
    [Show full text]
  • Názory Na Rizikové Chování U Parkourové Komunity
    Názory na rizikové chování u parkourové komunity Jiří Tuhovčák Bakalářská práce 2019 ABSTRAKT Bakalářská práce na téma ,,Rizikové chování u parkourové komunity“ se zaměřuje na zjiš- tění názorů na rizikové chování u parkourové komunity ze strany společnosti, ze strany samotné parkourové komunity a identifikování projevů rizikového chování u parkourové komunity. Práce je zaměřena na rizikové období adolescence v souvislosti s parkourovou komunitou. Teoretická část se zabývá parkourem, jeho historií, vývojem, subkulturami mládeže, mládeží, rizikovým chováním a jeho prevencí a stigmatizací parkourové komuni- ty. Praktická část je zaměřena na zjištění názorů rizikové chování u parkourové komunity a komunitu samotnou, důvodů stigmatizace, možností prevence rizikového a projevy riziko- vého chování u parkourové komunity. Klíčová slova: Rizikové chování, stigmatizace, mládež, subkultury, parkour, parkourová komunita, pre- vence ABSTRACT Bachelor thesis on topic „risky behavior in parkour community“ is focused on finding out society´s opinion on risky behavior in parkour community, parkour community´s opinion on risky behavior in parkour community and identification of signs of risky behavior in parkour community. Thesis is focused on risky adolescence period related with parkour community. Theoretical part is concerned about parkour, its history and evolution, youth subcultures, youth itself, risky behavior, its prevention and parkour community stigmati- zation. Practical part is concerned about finding out opinions on risky behavior in parkour community and on community itself, reasons for stigmatization, possibility of risky beha- vior prevention and signs of risky behavior in parkour community. Keywords: Risk Behavior, Stigmatization, Youth, Subculture, Parkour, Parkour Community Tímto bych chtěl poděkovat paní PhDr. Heleně Skarupské PhD., za odborné rady a pomoc při vedení mé bakalářské práce.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition Announcement Press Release Jan 2017
    Pre-event press release Embargoed until 9am on Tuesday 10th January 2017 Parkour takes giant leap to become officially recognised sport The UK has becomes the first country in the world to officially recognise Parkour/Freerunning as a sport, after the Home Country Sports Councils approved Parkour UK’s application for recognition of the sport and the National Governing Body. Parkour, also known as Freerunning or Art du Deplacement, is the non-competitive physical discipline of training to move freely over and through any terrain using only the abilities of the body, principally through running, jumping, climbing and quadrupedal movement. In practice it focuses on developing the fundamental attributes required for such movement, which include functional strength and fitness, balance, spatial awareness, agility, coordination, precision, control and creative vision. Parkour/Freerunning motivates people to get active. Participants can take part in the sport whenever and wherever they want, without needing to meticulously manage their busy diaries, buy special equipment, join a club, or book a pitch or court. All you need is a pair of trainers and your imagination to #GiveParkourAGo! The recognition of Parkour/Freerunning as a sport & Parkour UK as the National Governing Body (NGB) by the Home Country Sports Councils - Sport England, Sport Northern Ireland, sportscotland, Sport Wales and UK Sport follows completion of the UK recognition process by Parkour UK. Parkour UK, was established in 2009 by the nation’s Parkour/Freerunning community and the City of Westminster. It began the formal recognition process in March 2013, with the pre application for recognition approved in March 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Visuaaliset Menetelmät Visuaaliset Menetelmät
    LAPSUUDEN- JA NUORISOTUTKIMUKSESSA VISUAALISET MENETELMÄT VISUAALISET MENETELMÄT Digitalisoitumisen aikana lasten ja nuorten kulttuuri ja arki sisältävät visuaalista ainesta enemmän kuin koskaan. Myös LAPSUUDEN- JA tutkimuksessa on alettu käyttää entistä rohkeammin visuaalisia menetelmiä, etenkin osana lapsuuden- ja nuorisotutkimusta. Tässä teoksessa pohditaan visuaalisten menetelmien käyttöön liittyviä NUORISOTUTKIMUKSESSA erityiskysymyksiä. Eri aloilla toimivien tutkijoiden esimerkit havainnollistavat, kuinka visuaaliset menetelmät ovat edustettuina suomalaisen lapsuuden- ja nuorisotutkimuksen kentällä. Kielellisen tiedon ohessa visuaalisella tiedolla on oma erityisyytensä, mikäli tarkastellaan lasten ja nuorten osallisuutta tutkimusprosessissa tai eri tiedontuottamistapojen ominaispiirteitä. Visuaalisten menetelmien käytön lisäännyttyä niin aineistonkeruussa, analyysissa kuin tiedon esittämisessäkin on syntynyt tarve monitieteiselle metodologiselle keskustelulle, joka vie tieteen visuaalistumisen projektia eteenpäin. Tämä teos on suunnattu visuaalisesta metodologiasta sekä Marja Leena Böök & Antti-Ville Kärjä (toim.) Marleena Mustola, Johanna Mykkänen, monitieteisestä lapsuuden- ja nuorisotutkimuksesta kiinnostuneille tutkijoille ja opiskelijoille. Teoksen kirjoittajien tutkimusaloja ovat sosiologia, kasvatustiede, kulttuurin- ja taiteentutkimus, maantiede, liikuntatiede, uskontotiede ja perhetutkimus. nuorisotutkimusseura ry. nuorisotutkimusverkosto ISBN 978-952-5994-90-2 ISSN 1799-9219 Kl 16.7 MARLEENA MUSTOLA, JOHANNA MYKKÄNEN,
    [Show full text]
  • Parkour, the Affective Appropriation of Urban Space, and the Realvirtual
    Parkour, The Affective Appropriation of Urban Space, and the Real/Virtual Dialectic Jeffrey L. Kidder∗ Northern Illinois University Parkour is a new sport based on athletically and artistically overcoming urban obsta- cles. In this paper, I argue that the real world practices of parkour are dialectically intertwined with the virtual worlds made possible by information and communi- cation technologies. My analysis of parkour underscores how globalized ideas and images available through the Internet and other media can be put into practice within specific locales. Practitioners of parkour, therefore, engage their immediate, physical world at the same time that they draw upon an imagination enabled by their on-screen lives. As such, urban researchers need to consider the ways that vir- tual worlds can change and enhance how individuals understand and utilize the material spaces of the city. EMPLACEMENT IN A VIRTUAL WORLD With the increasing integration of information and communication technologies (ICTs) into our lives, more and more of our daily interactions take place “on screen” (Turkle 1995). Castells (1996) refers to this as a culture of real virtuality. In this process, the ex- periences of our physically situated, corporeal selves are becoming intertwined with the virtual presentation of our selves online (cf. Gottschalk 2010; Ito et al. 2010; Turkle 2011; Williams 2006). It is tempting, perhaps, to dichotomize on-screen and off-screen life. One is “real”—connected to the obdurate reality of time and space and hemmed in by biolog- ical limits and social inequalities (e.g., Robins 1995). The other is “virtual”—free-floating and filled with nearly limitless potential (e.g., Rheingold 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Parkour, Flux Park
    Kryštof Kolíbal Parkour, flux park, Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Jaroslav Najbert Datum odevzdání: 23. června 2018 Abstrakt Profilová práce se zabývala objasněním historie, současné situace, vývoje, problematiky a filosofie pohybových disciplín parkouru a freeruningu laické veřejnosti. Vytvořením 3D modelu parkourového hřiště ve spolupráci s firmou hřiště.cz a organizací childfriendlycity.cz. a zmapováním možností tréninku na Praze 6 Klíčová slova Parkour, freerun, pohyb, disciplína, sport, umění, spot Obsah 1. Úvod 4 1.1 Postup práce 4 2. Parkour x Freerun 5 2.1 Historie 6 2.2 Současnost 7 2.3 Parkourové techniky 9 3. Co je to FLUX? 11 3.1 Výběr místa pro parkourové hřiště 11 3.2 Zmapování okolních spotů 11 3.3Seznam spotů 12 Název spotu: Cube 12 Název spotu: Dětské hřiště Dejvice 12 Název spotu: Dejvice nádraží/Podbaba 12 Název spotu: Dejvice v Sedlci 12 Název spotu: Dejvická dřeva 13 Název spotu: Evropská raily 13 4. Návrh parkourového hřiště 14 4.1 Pohled z boku 14 4.2 Pohled ze shora 15 Závěr 16 Literatura, zdroje 16 Úvod Úvodem bych chtěl předestřít svou motivaci pro tuto práci. Jedná se o zprostředkování tématu, které je mi velmi blízké, jelikož se pohybové disciplíně “parkouru” věnuji již čtvrtým rokem. Laický čtenář si název může zaměnit s více známou disciplínou, parkur, která se provozuje s koňmi. Což parkour není. Parkour je umění efektivního pohybu v jakémkoliv prostoru, tento úžasný sport je téměř neznámý, a z tohoto důvodu, bych chtěl ukázat, co parkour je, odkud pochází, jak se vyvíjel, kam směřuje a problematiku s tím spojenou. V Praze je mnoho spotů na kterých se dá trénovat, ale chybí parkourová hřiště.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Taylor
    This matter is being dealt with by: Eugene Minogue Chief Executive Direct Line: +44 (0)7 920 793 728 Telephone: +44 (0)20 3544 5834 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.parkour.uk Date: Friday, 31 March 2017 President Morinari Watanabe Fédération Internationale de Gymnastique D Avenue de la Gare 12A a Case postale 630 t 1001 Lausanne e Switzerland : OPEN LETTER T h Dear President Morinari Watanabe, u r RE: ‘Development of a related FIG discipline’ based on Parkour/Freerunning s d I write from Parkour UK, the recognised National Governing Body (NGB) / National Federation for the recognised a sport of Parkour/Freerunning in the United Kingdom (appendix 1 – Letter of recognition from the UK Sports y Councils), regarding the encroachment and misappropriation of our sport by Fédération Internationale de , Gymnastique (FIG) via ‘development of a related FIG discipline’ based on Parkour/Freerunning, as detailed in your press release dated 24th February 2017, Lausanne (Sui), FIG Office. 3 0 As the recognised custodians of the recognised sport of Parkour/Freerunning in the UK and to protect and promote the integrity, rights, freedoms and interests of Traceurs/Freerunners (practitioners of our sport), our member M organisations & the UK community - as well as by legitimate extension the international Parkour/Freerunning a community - we feel that it is both necessary and expedient to provide some much needed clarification on r Parkour/Freerunning, such that our sport is neither misappropriated and/or encroached upon by FIG internationally c and/or nationally by any FIG member National Federations. h Clarification on Parkour/Freerunning; 2 0 What is a ‘sport’?: 1 7 The council of Europe definition of sport (Article 2): “Sport” means all forms of physical activity which, through casual or organised participation, aim at expressing or improving physical fitness and mental well-being, forming social relationships or obtaining results in competition at all levels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Displacement Parkour As a Challenge to Social Perceptions of Body and Space
    The Art of Displacement Parkour as a challenge to social perceptions of body and space Neill Brown Introduction The ‘art of displacement’ and ‘free-running’ are terms used for what I shall refer to here as parkour. Practitioners have found parkour to be an activity which requires many qualities but also one which leads to insights into their mental, emotional and physical states; bringing feelings of freedom, ownership and expression not previously encountered in their day-to-day lives. In this dissertation my aim is to explore practitioners’ claims that parkour has the capacity to encapsulate many factors of life that shape people in the direction of honour, trust, integrity and creativity. As individuals influence society, I also argue that parkour offers possibilities for change within the nature of culture in the direction of freedom and respect. Although the meaning and uses of parkour are diverse and numerous, I will initially explain what parkour ‘is’ and give some background to the discipline. I will then look at practitioners’ belief that the individual processes of mind and body can find a greater connectedness through parkour; leading to a sense of a fuller consciousness and a felt experience of ones body being the physical agent of the mind. As parkour continues to grow and develop globally, I will address whether this seemingly ‘universal’ appeal stems from some ‘natural’ human capacity or desire, whose appropriate outlet of expression has lain dormant. Social constraints are placed upon movement through space; as parkour directly challenges city planners and architects in their vision of the use of buildings and space, I will explore some of the ways in which practicing parkour can change perceptions of the possibilities presented by the environment.
    [Show full text]