DOCSLIB.ORG

The East Sussex Against Scams Partnership Is a Group of Local

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The East Sussex Against Scams Partnership Is a Group of Local The East Sussex Against Scams Partnership is a group of local organisations (ie businesses, charities, clubs, community enterprises, councils, societies, voluntary groups and others) who are helping to raise awareness about scams / fraud. They are “signed up” to the ESASP Charter, pledging activities to help support each other’s efforts in an aim to make East Sussex a scam-free county • 3VA • East Sussex Seniors’ Association (ESSA) • Action in Rural Sussex (AIRS) • Eastbourne Blind Society • Active in Recovery (AiR) • Eastbourne Borough Council • Age Concern Eastbourne • Eastbourne Dementia Action Alliance • Age UK East Sussex • Eastbourne Downlands Computer Club • Association of Carers • Eastbourne Seniors Forum • Care for the Carers • Eastbourne Volunteers • Chanctonbury Healthcare • ECK Bookkeeping and Accounts Ltd • Chiddingly Parish Council • ESPAN (East Sussex Personal Assistants’ Network) • ChoicES Recruitment • Fairwarp Echo Please note: East Sussex • Citizens Advice East Sussex (incorporating • Fat Promotions Limited County Council neither endorses Eastbourne, Hastings, Lewes District, Rother District and Wealden) • Firwood House, Eastbourne nor guarantees in any way the • Columbus Point Residents Association • Fletching Parish Council organisations listed. They are • Cranstoun – East Sussex FACT (Family & Carers Team) • Gaby Hardwicke listed on the basis of their • Crowborough Town Council • Get a Room Online Limited pledged support of the ESASP. • Designer Travel • Hastings Advice and Representation Centre (HARC) • Ditzy Media Limited • Hastings and Bexhill Mencap Society • East Dean and Friston Community Watch • Hastings and Rother U3A • East Dean and Friston Parish Council • Hastings & St Leonards Seniors’ Forum • East Sussex Association of Blind & Partially Sighted People (ESAB) • Hastings Borough Council • East Sussex Community Voice delivering Healthwatch East Sussex • Heringtons LLP • East Sussex County Council • High Weald Lewes Havens Clinical Commissioning Group • East Sussex Federation of Women’s Institutes • East Sussex Fire & Rescue Service • East Sussex Hearing Resource Centre (ESHRC) The East Sussex Against Scams Partnership is a group of local organisations (ie businesses, charities, clubs, community enterprises, councils, societies, voluntary groups and others) who are helping to raise awareness about scams / fraud. They are “signed up” to the ESASP Charter, pledging activities to help support each other’s efforts in an aim to make East Sussex a scam-free county • Home Instead Senior Care (Bexhill & Hastings) • Rother Seniors Forum • Home Instead Senior Care • Rother Voluntary Action (RVA) (Crowborough & High Weald) Please note: East Sussex • Rotherfield St Martin • Home Instead Senior Care County Council neither • RSE Group (Eastbourne & Hailsham) endorses nor guarantees in • South East Water any way the organisations • Home Instead Senior Care (Lewes • Seaford Seniors’ Forum (SSF) District & Uckfield) listed. They are listed on the • STEPS • Home Works basis of their pledged support • Sussex & Surrey Associations of Local Councils (SSALC) • Know Dementia of the ESASP. • Sussex Armed Forces Network • Lewes District Council • Sussex Community Development Association (SCDA) • Lewes Town Council • Sussex Neighbourhood Watch Federation • Mayfield & Five Ashes Parish Council • Sussex Oakleaf • Meridian Mature Citizens Forum • Sussex Support Service Ltd • Metro Bank (Eastbourne branch) • Thebestofeastbourne • Mothers’ Union, Hellingly & Upper Dicker Churches • The ICE Project (Improving Carers’ Experience) • National Westminster Bank plc (branches within East Sussex) • The Ivy House • Office of the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner • The Luxford Club • Parish of St Mary Magdalene’s (comprising St Mary Magdalene’s, Our Lady • Uckfield Town Council of the Rosary, and St Martha’s churches) • Uckfield Volunteer Centre • Pevensey Villages Partnership (PVP) • Victim Support (Sussex) • Polegate Town Council • Wealden Dementia Action Alliance (WDAA) • Possability People • Wealden District Council • Promedica24 live-in care, West central Kent & North Wealden • Wealden Senior Citizens’ Partnership • Radfield Home Care Hastings and Rother • Welbeing • Right at Home (Eastbourne, Bexhill and Seaford) • Withyham Parish Council • Rother District Council • Wow Telemarketing • Yew Tree Stone Limited .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Pollution and Decontamination
    Background and Context Following three days of exceptionally heavy rain on already saturated ground, the River Ouse overtopped the flood defences and flooded substantial parts of Lewes. 613 residential and 207 business properties were flooded, along with 16 public buildings. 1000 people were displaced. 503 vehicles were damaged or destroyed and the total cost of the flooding was given as £88 million. How the Topic was Handled A Restoration Sub-Group was appointed, working to the Lewes Flood Recovery Co-ordinating Group . Its Terms of Reference were “ To co- ordinatethe clear-up of the affected areas, including the consideration of long- term health issues .” Represented on the sub-group were: • Lewes District Council (Environmental Health, Housing Maintenance, Building Control, Design & Conservation) • East Sussex County Council (Transport & Environment, Trading Standards) • East Sussex Brighton & Hove Health Authority (Public Health Consultant). This sub-group met five times, under the chairmanship of a senior Environmental Health Officer from Lewes DC, the last time being in May 2001. Key points arising were: • Provision of public health advice, particularly on how to handle cleaning up flooded homes and avoiding contamination. • Flooding of industrial areas released oil and other pollutants. As water receded, oil became concentrated in one watercourse. Environment Agency boomed (contained with bunding) some 70,000 litres of waste and heating oil and removed by tanker. • Flood stirred up dormant soil content from previous industrialisation. • Concern about children and pets playing in contaminated gardens. • Regional epidemiologist commenced survey into health effects in July 2001 using sample of 120 flood-affected households and ‘control’ population of non-flooded households.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Highways & Byways in Sussex
    Highways & Byways in Sussex by E. V. Lucas (1904) CHAPTER XXXIV: EASTBOURNE Eastbourne is the most select, or least democratic, of the Sussex watering places. Fashion does not resort thither as to Brighton in the season, but the crowds of excursionists that pour into Brighton and Hastings are comparatively unknown at Eastbourne; which is in a sense a private settlement, under the patronage of the Duke of Devonshire. Hastings is of the people; Brighton has a character almost continental; Eastbourne is select. Lawn tennis and golf are its staple products, one played on the very beautiful links behind the town hard by Compton Place, the residence of the Duke; the other in Devonshire Park. It is also an admirable town for horsemanship. … The Martello towers, which Pitt built during the Napoleonic scare at the beginning of last century, begin at Eastbourne, where the cliffs cease, and continue along the coast into Kent. They were erected probably quite as much to assist in allaying public fear by a tangible and visible symbol of defense as from any idea that they would be a real service in the event of invasion. Many of them have now disappeared. BEACHY HEAD Eastbourne's glory is Beachy Head, the last of the Downs, which stop dead at the town The Beekeeper’s Apprentice Common Core study unit—www.LaurieRKing.com and never reappear in Sussex again. The range takes a sudden turn to the south at Folkington, whence it rolls straight for the sea, Beachy Head being the ultimate eminence. (The name Beachy has, by the way, nothing to do with the beach: it is derived probably from the Normans' description—"beau chef.") About Beachy Head one has the South Downs in perfection: the best turf, the best prospect, the best loneliness, and the best air.
    [Show full text]
  • Duty to Cooperate: Statement of Common Ground Cross-Boundary Working and Meeting Housing Needs
    Duty to cooperate: Statement of common ground Cross-boundary working and meeting housing needs This agreement is between: Lewes District Council South Downs National Park Authority Adur District Council Arun District Council Brighton and Hove City Council Chichester District Council Crawley Borough Council Eastbourne Borough Council Hastings Borough Council Horsham District Council Mid Sussex District Council Rother District Council Wealden District Council Worthing Borough Council Map 1: Lewes district in context 1 1. Background 1.1 Section 110 of the Localism Act 2011 places a legal duty on local planning authorities and other prescribed bodies to cooperate with each other on strategic planning matters insofar as they are relevant to their administrative areas throughout the preparation of their development plan documents. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 2012 reiterates this duty and requires an independent inspector to assess whether the development plan they are examining has been prepared in accordance with the duty to cooperate. 1.2 It is expected that engagement and cooperation will be constructive, active and ongoing in order to maximise effectiveness throughout plan preparation as well as implementation, delivery and subsequent review. The national Planning Practice Guidance confirms that this is not a duty to agree but that local planning authorities should make every effort to secure the necessary cooperation on cross-boundary strategic matters before submitting development plan documents for examination. The examination will test whether the duty has been complied with. 2. Purpose 2.1 This statement of common ground sets out how Lewes District Council and South Downs National Park Authority have actively and positively sought to comply with the duty to cooperate in the preparation of the Joint Core Strategy development plan document on strategic planning matters, with the main cross-boundary factor affecting Lewes district being housing provision.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Strategy
    Wealden District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Working with the South Downs National Park Authority i Summary iii 1 Introduction 1 What is the Core Strategy? 1 How is the Core Strategy structured? 1 How has it been prepared? 1 Contents 2 Context 3 Picture of place and key issues 4 Settlements and communities 4 The environment of Wealden 5 Working in Wealden 6 Living in Wealden 6 3 Key Elements of the Wealden Spatial Strategy 9 Wealden settlement hierarchy 9 Housing 13 Employment and business 15 Retail 17 Tourism 17 Environment 20 4 Vision and Spatial Planning Objectives 21 Wealden’s spatial planning objectives 21 5 Spatial Strategy Policies 25 Provision for homes and jobs 25 Distribution of homes and jobs 26 Use of previously developed land 28 Windfalls 28 Strategic development areas 29 Managing the release of housing land 30 Housing trajectory 30 Contingency 34 6 Local Spatial Implications of the Strategy 35 Uckfield area strategy 35 Hailsham/Hellingly area strategy 39 Polegate and Willingdon and Stone Cross area strategy 43 Crowborough area strategy 47 Heathfield area strategy 50 Rural areas strategy 52 Wealden District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Contents 7 Core Delivery Policies 57 Infrastructure 57 Housing 59 Housing type and size 59 Affordable housing 59 Rural exceptions 62 Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople 62 Environment 64 Biodiversity 64 Green infrastructure 66 Climate change and sustainable construction 69 Sustainable Development 70 8 Delivering the Core Strategy 71 Implementation and delivery 71 Wealden/East Sussex Local Area Agreement 72 9 Saved Polices 73 10 Key Diagram 75 Wealden District Local Development Framework Core Strategy Working with the South Downs National Park Authority ity On 1st April 2011 the South Downs National Park Authority became the statutory Planning Authority for the South Downs National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfnpa 536/17 New Forest National Park Authority
    New Forest National Park Authority Meeting NFNPA 536/17 14 December 2017 Submission Draft New Forest National Park Authority Local Plan 2016-2036 NFNPA 536/17 NEW FOREST NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY AUTHORITY MEETING – 14 DECEMBER 2017 SUBMISSION DRAFT NEW FOREST NATIONAL PARK LOCAL PLAN 2016 - 2036 Report by: David Illsley, Policy Manager 1. Introduction 1.1 Members will recall considering a report at the October 2017 Authority meeting which summarised the position reached in the review of the local planning policies for the National Park and established the timetable for the remaining stages in the review (NFNPA 534/17). This report now seeks formal member endorsement of the proposed Submission draft New Forest National Park Local Plan 2016 – 2036 for the purposes of a final six week period of consultation to commence in January 2018; and then submission to the Secretary of State for independent examination in Spring 2018. 1.2 This report highlights the main policy approaches in the Submission draft Local Plan, which have been informed by the representations received on the draft Local Plan in 2016 and the completion of a number of evidence base studies. The Submission draft Local Plan also has regard to the changes in national planning policy announced this year. 2. The role of the Local Plan 2.1 The Government’s National Parks Vision and Circular (2010) recognises the importance of the planning system in the delivery of the two National Park purposes. For this reason the Environment Act 1995 makes national park authorities legally the sole planning authorities for their areas, covering the development management, planning enforcement, minerals & waste planning and planning policy functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Collection Commitment Signatories
    Signatories to the Waste Collection Commitment North East Eastern Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council Peterborough City Council Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Fenland District Council Hartlepool Borough Council Tendring District Council Darlington Borough Council Maldon District Council Gateshead Council Colchester Borough Council Durham Council Chelmsford Borough Council Middlesbrough Council Castle Point Borough Council North Tyneside Borough Council Braintree District Council North Norfolk District Council North West St Edmundsbury Borough Council Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Forest Heath District Council Hyndburn Borough Council Central Bedfordshire Council Fylde Borough Council South Cambridgeshire District Council Blackburn with Darwen Council Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Cheshire East Council Dacorum Borough Council Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council Broadland District Council Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council Hertsmere Borough Council Wyre Borough Council South Ribble Borough Council East Midlands Stockport Council Chesterfield Borough Council North West Leicestershire District Council West Midlands Charnwood Borough Council Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Blaby District Council Stratford-on-Avon District Council West Lindsey District Council Shropshire Council North Kesteven District Council Wolverhampton City Council South Holland District Council Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council Boston Borough Council Lichfield District Council South Kesteven District Council Stafford Borough Council Lincoln City
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Rother District Council Environment Strategy PDF 291 KB
    Rother District Council Report to: Cabinet Date: 27 July 2020 Title: Consultation Report – Draft Rother District Council Environment Strategy Report of: Ben Hook – Head of Service, Acquisitions, Transformation and Regeneration Cabinet Member: Councillor Field Ward(s): All Purpose of Report: To report the results of the public consultation for the draft Environment Strategy, and the recommendations of the Climate Change Steering Group Officer Recommendation(s): Recommendation to COUNCIL: That the Rother Environment Strategy 2020-2030 be approved and adopted, subject to the inclusion of the items listed in paragraphs 14 and 15 of the report, identified through the consultation process and recommended by the Climate Change Steering Group. Introduction 1. At its meeting on 16 September 2019 (Minute C19/38 refers), full Council agreed the following resolution to: i. Declare a ‘climate emergency’. ii. Review and update urgently Rother District Council’s current carbon strategy. iii. Pledge to do what is within our powers, to make Rother District carbon neutral by 2030, taking into account both production and consumption emissions. iv. Call on the Government to provide any additional powers and resources necessary for Rother District to achieve the target of becoming carbon neutral by 2030, and to implement best practice methods to limit global warming to 1.5ºC. v. Request that Cabinet establishes a Steering Group to report to full Council within six months with an Action Plan, outlining how the Council will address this emergency. The Carbon Neutral 2030 Action Plan will detail the leadership role Rother District will take in promoting community, public, business and other Council partnerships to achieve this commitment throughout the District.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting People Services
    East Sussex directory of Supporting People services All information correct at time of going to press May 2010 Equal Opportunities and Diversity Policy Statement We are committed to equality and diversity, as both a Service of services and as an employer. Our practices and procedures aim to reflect the varied needs, expectations and culture of all members of our community. We make every effort to ensure that no member of the community receives less favourable treatment when accessing our services on the grounds of: • gender • gender identity • disability • race • religion or belief • age, or • sexual orientation. 2 Partnership Logos 3 What is Supporting People? The Supporting People programme pays for housing-related support services that help people to live independently. Housing-related support is help you can get to find, or stay in, your own home. This includes help to manage money, claim benefits and develop domestic or social skills. The Supporting People team is part of the Adult Social Care Department. The money for the Supporting People programme comes from the Government as the Supporting People Grant. We use the money to pay other organisations to provide this support and to make sure that the support is as good as possible. We pay for many different support services, including sheltered housing for older people, women’s refuges, supported-living schemes for people with learning disabilities or mental health problems (where you can get housing and support), and services for young people. We work with five district and borough councils, health services and the probation service to manage the programme.
    [Show full text]
  • East Sussex Against Scams Partnership Charter Partners
    East Sussex Against Scams Partnership Charter Partners The East Sussex Against Scams Partnership (ESASP) is a group of local organisations - businesses, charities, clubs, community enterprises, councils, societies, voluntary groups and others - committed to taking a stand against scams. The following have signed up to the ESASP Charter, pledging to work in partnership supporting each other’s efforts with the aim of making East Sussex a scam-free county: Action in rural Sussex (AirS) Active in Recovery (AiR) 63 Age Concern Eastbourne Charter 47 Age UK East Sussex Partners Charter Association of Carers signed Partners up! signed up Care for the Carers Chiddingly Parish Council ChoicES Recruitment Citizens Advice East Sussex (incorporating Eastbourne, Hastings, Lewes District, Rother District and Wealden) Columbus Point Residents Association Eastbourne Crowborough Town Council East Dean and Friston Parish Council East Sussex Association of Blind and Partially Sighted People (ESAB) East Sussex Community Voice delivering Healthwatch East Sussex East Sussex County Council East Sussex Federation of Women’s Institutes East Sussex Fire & Rescue Service East Sussex Hearing Resource Centre (ESHRC) East Sussex Seniors’ Association (ESSA) Eastbourne Blind Society Eastbourne Dementia Action Alliance Eastbourne Volunteers ECK Bookkeeping and Accounts Limited Please note: East Sussex County Council neither endorses nor guarantees in any way the organisations listed above. They are listed on the basis of their pledged support of the ESASP. Page 1 ESPAN
    [Show full text]
  • Lewes District Local Plan Part 2 Submission and It Sets out How the Duty to Cooperate Has Been Met in Preparing This Plan
    Lewes District Local Plan Part 2 – Site Allocations & Development Management Policies Duty to Cooperate Statement December 2018 Contents Introduction 3 Context 4 Cross Boundary Strategic Planning Priorities 4 Key Relationships and Ongoing Work and Outcomes 7 Appendix – Statements of Common Ground 10 2 1 Introduction 1.1 The Localism Act 2011 places a duty on local planning authorities and other prescribed bodies to cooperate with each other on strategic planning matters relevant to their areas. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) reiterates this duty and requires an independent inspector to assess whether the plan they are examining has been prepared in accordance with the duty. 1.2 This statement has been prepared as a supporting document to the Lewes District Local Plan Part 2 submission and it sets out how the Duty to Cooperate has been met in preparing this plan. 1.3 The Duty to Cooperate requires ongoing constructive and active engagement on the preparation of development plan documents and other activities relating to sustainable development and the use of land. In particular it applies to strategic planning matters where they affect more than one local planning authority area. 1.4 Most cross-boundary issues affecting the district were dealt with in the recently adopted Local Plan Part 1and do not fall to be re-opened. Local Plan Part 2 is not a strategic plan; rather it is the detailed implementation of the existing strategic plan – the Local Plan Part 1. 1.5 In the Report on the Examination into the Lewes District Local Plan Part 1 – Joint Core Strategy1 published on 22nd March 2016 the Inspector confirmed in his assessment of the duty to cooperate: “The Councils have established effective and on-going working relationships with neighbouring and nearby local planning authorities, particularly through the East Sussex Strategic Planning Members Group and the Coastal West Sussex and Greater Brighton Strategic Planning Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Rother District Council
    Rother District Local Plan – Inspector’s Report Section 9 – Employment Developments on this single track railway would necessarily be relatively infrequent and there is a lack of evidence before me to support assertions that the operation of the railway would destroy the peace or tranquillity of the valley or that the previous extension to Bodiam had such an effect. The low embankments and suitably-designed river bridges would have a limited visual impact on what is a large scale open landscape. 9.55 However it is more difficult to predict the visual impact of the works that would be necessary to cross the various roads since these crossings have not been designed. If, as appears likely (see below), the relevant authorities would only sanction a bridge crossing of the A21 and B2244, that would require considerable engineering structures to take the road over the railway or vice versa. These works would include the bridge itself and necessary associated cuttings or embankments. Embankments appear to be the more likely given the location of the crossings within the river flood plain where cuttings could take the road or railway below the level of the water table. To achieve the necessary clearance, embankments would probably be significantly taller and wider than the original railway embankments with a greater landscape impact. However the actual impact on the AONB cannot be predicted without a designed scheme. Impact on farming operations and on the living conditions of adjoining occupiers 9.56 Subject to detailed consideration at the planning application stage, I consider that the proposed route is likely to be sufficiently remote from residential property that the noise or other emissions from the railway would not be unacceptably harmful to the living conditions of the occupiers.
    [Show full text]