Prevent Violent Extremism Why Does It Happens? What Kind of Futures We Should Build in Order to Prevent It? How Do We Prevent Violent Extremism?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prevent Violent Extremism Why Does It Happens? What Kind of Futures We Should Build in Order to Prevent It? How Do We Prevent Violent Extremism? Prevent Violent Extremism Why does it happens? What kind of futures we should build in order to prevent it? How do we prevent violent extremism? OPEV Manual to prevent violent extremism 1 Work done by www.opev.org Coordinator Nacho García Pedraza Authors: Begoña Aramayona Débora Avila Mauge Cañada Javier Fernández Ramos Sergio García García Nacho García Pedraza Luis González Reyes Conchi Piñeiro Alexandra Vassilou Lily Vassilou 2 Index Why now?.................................................................................................................7 Who it is aimed at.....................................................................................................7 Theory of change in this manual............................................................................7 From macro to micro, from “why?” to “how?” through working on needs.....................................7 How to read and use this manual...........................................................................8 The limits to this manual.........................................................................................9 1 What is violent extremism?................................................................................10 Summary............................................................................................................................10 Introduction.........................................................................................................................10 1.1 Radicalism or extremism?............................................................................................10 1.2 What is violence?.........................................................................................................11 1.3 What is violent extremism?...........................................................................................11 1.4 What causes VE?.........................................................................................................15 1.4.1 What do we understand as fundamental needs and satisfying such needs?....................17 1.5 How to anticipate? Prevention is transformation: Nonviolence that transforms..........19 2 WHY DOES VE HAPPEN?...................................................................................21 Summary............................................................................................................................21 Introduction.........................................................................................................................21 2.1 Global Crisis.................................................................................................................21 2.1.1 Environmental Crisis.........................................................................................................21 2.1.2 Economic Crisis................................................................................................................23 2.1.3 Social Crisis......................................................................................................................23 2.2 Global Crisis and EV....................................................................................................24 2.3 Lack of socio-economic opportunities..........................................................................25 2.4 Marginalisation and discrimination...............................................................................26 2.5 Political repression, violation of human rights and rule of law.....................................27 2.6 Prolonged and unresolved conflict...............................................................................28 2.7 Conclusion....................................................................................................................29 3 TRANSITIONS TO AN ECOSOCIAL FUTURE TO PREVENT VE......................31 Summary............................................................................................................................31 Introduction.........................................................................................................................31 3 3.1 Guiding principles in building synergic satisfiers in a just, democratic and sustainable sociedades.........................................................................................................................31 3.2 Strategies for non violent ecosocial transitions............................................................32 3.2.1 Building a culture of non violence through the satisfaction of needs.................................33 3.2.2 Slowing down increasing unease......................................................................................34 3.2.3 Construction of viable, ecosocial institutions in the Global Crisis......................................35 3.3 Tactics for non violent ecosocial transitions.................................................................38 4 WHEN “SECURITY” IS PART OF THE PROBLEM............................................43 Summary............................................................................................................................43 4.1 Context keys: violence, insecurity and security............................................................43 4.2 Understanding the hegemonic security model.............................................................44 4.2.1 Securitising territory, policing and militarising conflict........................................................44 4.3 Excepcionality, states of emergency and fear of the other as a securitarian strategy.46 4.3.1 Non-state actors in the production of securitarian strategies.............................................48 4.3.2 “Security” that produces insecurity?..................................................................................48 4.4 Synergic satisfiers of security: Towards security based on rights and bonds..............49 4.4.1 Human security.................................................................................................................49 4.4.2 Anti-securitarian discourse................................................................................................49 4.4.3 De-securitizing our lives: community and feminism in building trust..................................50 5 IDENTITY..............................................................................................................54 Introduction: Why work on identity?...................................................................................54 5.1 Concept of Identity.......................................................................................................54 5.1.1 What is identity and what components does it have?........................................................54 5.1.2 How is identity built? Priority identities..............................................................................55 5.1.2.1 The threat in our identity..............................................................................................55 5.1.2.2 Identity crisis...............................................................................................................57 5.1.3 From threatened identity or identity crisis to VE................................................................59 5.1.4 What threatens our identity? Threat factors and drivers....................................................60 5.2 Satisfaction of the need of identity: Social identity.......................................................62 6 CONFLICT AND POLARISATION.......................................................................65 Summary............................................................................................................................65 Introduction.........................................................................................................................65 6.1 Dealing with conflict......................................................................................................65 6.1.1 Conflict stages..................................................................................................................65 6.1.2 Content of conflict.............................................................................................................68 6.1.3 Conflict operates on three levels.......................................................................................69 6.1.4 Awareness and Fluidity in Conflict.....................................................................................71 6.2 Escalation and De-escalation.......................................................................................71 4 6.2.1 What escalates a conflict?................................................................................................72 6.2.2 What de-escalates conflict................................................................................................73 6.3 Polarisation...................................................................................................................77 6.3.1 From flow on a continuum to polarisation..........................................................................77 6.3.2 Polarisation as a communication process.........................................................................78 6.3.3 De-escalation of conflicts between polarised groups........................................................78 6.3.4 Tips for preventing polarisation.........................................................................................79
Recommended publications
  • Customizable • Ease of Access Cost Effective • Large Film Library
    CUSTOMIZABLE • EASE OF ACCESS COST EFFECTIVE • LARGE FILM LIBRARY www.criterionondemand.com Criterion-on-Demand is the ONLY customizable on-line Feature Film Solution focused specifically on the Post Secondary Market. LARGE FILM LIBRARY Numerous Titles are Available Multiple Genres for Educational from Studios including: and Research purposes: • 20th Century Fox • Foreign Language • Warner Brothers • Literary Adaptations • Paramount Pictures • Justice • Alliance Films • Classics • Dreamworks • Environmental Titles • Mongrel Media • Social Issues • Lionsgate Films • Animation Studies • Maple Pictures • Academy Award Winners, • Paramount Vantage etc. • Fox Searchlight and many more... KEY FEATURES • 1,000’s of Titles in Multiple Languages • Unlimited 24-7 Access with No Hidden Fees • MARC Records Compatible • Available to Store and Access Third Party Content • Single Sign-on • Same Language Sub-Titles • Supports Distance Learning • Features Both “Current” and “Hard-to-Find” Titles • “Easy-to-Use” Search Engine • Download or Streaming Capabilities CUSTOMIZATION • Criterion Pictures has the rights to over 15000 titles • Criterion-on-Demand Updates Titles Quarterly • Criterion-on-Demand is customizable. If a title is missing, Criterion will add it to the platform providing the rights are available. Requested titles will be added within 2-6 weeks of the request. For more information contact Suzanne Hitchon at 1-800-565-1996 or via email at [email protected] LARGE FILM LIBRARY A Small Sample of titles Available: Avatar 127 Hours 2009 • 150 min • Color • 20th Century Fox 2010 • 93 min • Color • 20th Century Fox Director: James Cameron Director: Danny Boyle Cast: Sam Worthington, Sigourney Weaver, Cast: James Franco, Amber Tamblyn, Kate Mara, Michelle Rodriguez, Zoe Saldana, Giovanni Ribisi, Clemence Poesy, Kate Burton, Lizzy Caplan CCH Pounder, Laz Alonso, Joel Moore, 127 HOURS is the new film from Danny Boyle, Wes Studi, Stephen Lang the Academy Award winning director of last Avatar is the story of an ex-Marine who finds year’s Best Picture, SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways for the Amplification of Agroecology in African Sustainable
    sustainability Article Pathways for the Amplification of Agroecology in African Sustainable Urban Agriculture Cristiana Peano 1 , Stefano Massaglia 1 , Chiara Ghisalberti 1 and Francesco Sottile 2,* 1 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali e Alimentari, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy; [email protected] (C.P.); [email protected] (S.M.); [email protected] (C.G.) 2 Dipartimento di Architettura, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Edificio 14, 90128 Palermo, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 12 March 2020; Accepted: 29 March 2020; Published: 30 March 2020 Abstract: A growing awareness that highly intensified agricultural systems have made a substantial worldwide contribution to the worsening of the resilience capacity of natural ecosystems has, over the last twenty years, brought general attention to agroecological management models. This aspect is even more evident in industrial agriculture, which is based on the use of multiple chemical products derived from non-natural synthesis. In more developed countries, a new idea of ecology linked to agricultural production has been increasingly developed and, for this reason, there has been a greater diffusion of differentiated agricultural models taking into consideration the environmental impact of production choices and policies addressed to the conservation of natural resources. In urban agricultural production, it is even more important to adopt resilient production models that, in addition to developing responsible production paths and allowing a positive connection with the needs of consumers, guarantees reasonable and positive behaviors respecting the environment in which most of the urban population lives; in other words, the implementation of goal 12 of the sustainable development goals (SDG #12 Responsible Production and Consumption) of the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Système Pierre Rabhi
    Le système Pierre Rabhi En se répétant presque mot pour mot d’une apparition à une La panne des grandes espérances politiques remet au goût du jour une autre, Rabhi cisèle depuis plus d’un demi-siècle le récit vieille idée : pour changer le monde, il suffirait de se changer soi- autobiographique qui tient lieu à la fois de produit de même et de renouer avec la nature des liens détruits par la modernité. consommation de masse et de manifeste articulé autour d’un Portée par des personnalités charismatiques, comme le paysan choix personnel effectué en 1960, celui d’un « retour à la ardéchois Pierre Rabhi, cette « insurrection des consciences » qui terre » dans le respect des valeurs de simplicité, d’humilité, de sincérité et de vertu. Ses ouvrages centrés sur sa personne, ses appelle chacun à « faire sa part » connaît un succès grandissant. centaines de discours et d’entretiens qui, tous, racontent sa par Jean-Baptiste Malet vie ont abouti à ce résultat singulier : cet homme qui parle Journaliste, auteur de L’Empire de l’or rouge. Enquête mondiale sur la tomate continuellement de lui-même incarne aux yeux de ses d’industrie, Fayard, Paris, 2017. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr, août 2018 admirateurs et des journalistes la modestie et le sens des Dans le grand auditorium du palais des congrès de limites. Rues, parcs, centres sociaux, hameaux portent le nom Montpellier, un homme se tient tapi en bordure de la scène de ce saint laïque, promu en 2017 chevalier de la Légion tandis qu’un millier de spectateurs fixent l’écran.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalizing Agroecology in France: Social Circulation Changes the Meaning of an Idea
    sustainability Communication Institutionalizing Agroecology in France: Social Circulation Changes the Meaning of an Idea Stéphane Bellon * and Guillaume Ollivier ID Ecodéveloppement, Inra, Avignon 84914, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 March 2018; Accepted: 25 April 2018; Published: 30 April 2018 Abstract: Agroecology has come a long way. In the past ten years, it has reappeared in France throughout the agricultural sector and is now included in public and private strategies and in supportive policies, with collateral interest effects. Is a new “agro-revolution” taking place? To address this issue, using a methodology mixing hyperlink mapping and textual corpora analysis, we focus here on the trajectory of agroecology in various worlds: that of academia, social movements, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that promote international solidarity, research and training institutions and public policies. This trajectory intertwines actors and time lines, with periods in which certain actors play a specific role, and others in which interactions between actors are dominant in terms of coalition advocacy. Some actors play a major role in circulating agroecology as they belong to several different social worlds (e.g., academia and NGO), present high occupational mobility (from politician to scientist and vice versa), are charismatic or have an irradiating aura in the media, and can articulate and circulate ideas between different social arenas (including between countries). The stabilization of networks of actors is interpreted as the institutionalization of agroecology, both within social movements as well as because of its integration into a policy aimed at an ecological modernization of agriculture. The international positioning of many actors anchors national and regional initiatives more strongly.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Release,Global Success
    CINEMAO and eniLoc present LOCAL RELEASE, GLOBAL SUCCESS Memento Films Distribution handled the French theatrical initiatives that can be used each at their own level, from farmers release on April 7th 2010 with over 80 prints. The key to to city dwellers. promoting such a documentary was a close collaboration with Convinced by the importance of word-of-mouth for this film, the local exhibitors as well as with the many associations and Memento Films Distribution also laid an important groundwork not-for-profits gravitating around the urgent themes of the film. prior to the release. Coline Serreau and her renowned A special, secured website was provided for exhibitors to view interviewees toured France for three months to attend preview the film and book it. This meant the most remote cinemas were screenings and Q&A sessions around the country. More than able to take part in the adventure and spread word-of-mouth 20,000 people saw the film before its release. very early on. All prints were fully booked for two months. The audience’s reception was more than enthusiastic: sustained Promotional partnerships were stricken with over 50 associations claps and standing ovations met the end of the film, as animated and not-for-profits, including WWF, Slow Food, Nicolas Hulot’s debates took place between the galvanized spectators and the Foundation, the French Soil Association, Kokopelli, Alter Eco, film crew. Biocoop, Dynamis, Melvita, Weleda, and others, enabling information about the film to reach people all around the country As for press, two publicists were hired, to handle «regular» press on and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilan D'activités 20
    FONDS DE DOTATION PIERRE BILAN RABHI D’ACTIVITÉS 2016- 17 Le Fonds de Dotation Pierre Rabhi, créé en 2013 (J.O. du 29 juin 2013) a pour vocation de participer à la propagation des idées développées par Pierre Rabhi, à la promotion et au développement de techniques agricoles écologiques préservant la biodiversité et l’environnement. Il intervient comme Fonds de distribution mais peut aussi apporter une assistance opérationnelle à certains projets. Son concours peut également prendre la forme d’un soutien financier vers d’autres organismes reconnus d’intérêt général. ©MARC N’GUESSAN ©MARC Le Fonds s’est attaché tout au long de ces deux années à collecter des fonds au travers de différentes opérations ou réunions. Les quatrième et cinquième années d’activité du Fonds de dotation Pierre Rabhi ont ainsi permis l’accompagnement de plusieurs projets pour un montant de 120 000 €. FONDS DE DOTATION PIERRE RABHI - MONTCHAMP 07230 LABLACHÈRE - TÉL. : 04 75 93 56 43 [email protected] LES PROJETS SOUTENUS EN 2016 1 Carrefour des Initiatives pour l’Agroécologie ( CIPA ) de Terre & Humanisme-Maroc : Le CIPA (Carrefour des Initiatives pour l’Agroécologie) et le Village de Douar Skoura situé au cœur du Maroc. Le Fonds qui a largement participé par le passé à la création de ce lieu de formation situé à Douar Skoura, à 30 kilomètres de Marrakech, a mandaté une mission d’audit et de recom- mandation auprès du réseau des Agroécologistes sans Frontières et, à l’heure de la COP 22 à Marrakech, proposé une mission d’aide organisationnelle. 2 Association pour la Promotion des Arbres Fertilitaires ( APAF ) Créée au Togo en 1992 l’APAF œuvre à l’introduction d’arbres fertilitaires ( ou légumineux ) dans les cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Agroecology and Sustainable
    Field Projects - Advocacy for Smallholders AGROECOLOGY Together, building a fair AND SUSTAINABLE and fraternal DEVELOPMENT world Agroecology and Sustainable Development 1 Field Projects - Advocacy for Smallholders This report has been produced by the International Action and Advocacy Department (DAPI) of Secours Catholique-Caritas France, working closely with a number of our partners. Our deepest gratitude goes to all those who have been involved with this report. The report has been coordinated by Jean Vettraino with support from Jean-Noël Menard and Vincent Minouflet. Production: Secours Catholique-Caritas France, 106 rue du Bac, 75341 Paris, 01 45 49 73 00 Publishing director: Marc Laroche. Design: Secours Catholique-Caritas France, Communication Department. Cover photo: Lionel Charrier - MYOP / SCCF - Ethiopia, March 2014. October 2016 Translation: Edward McGregor, January 2017 Contents Agroecology – Unlocking the future! 4 One concept – Multiple meanings 5 Clear benefits 6 Aims of this report 7 1. Conditions needed for the development of agroecology 9 Integrating fully local knowledge and practices 10 Guaranteeing land rights is essential 11 Recommendations for policymakers on the conditions necessary for the promotion of agroecology 12 2. Agroecology as a way of achieving food sovereignty 13 Quality and diverse agricultural produce 13 Smallholders caring for their territory 16 Recommendations for policymakers on how to achieve food sovereignty with agroecology 17 3. Protection and sustainable management of natural resources – The core principle of agroecology 18 The environment and natural resources – The foundations of agroecology 19 Methods suited to climate change 22 Opposing the destruction of ecosystems and the expropriation of resources 23 Recommendations for policy makers on the protection and sustainable management of natural resources 24 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Poverty Through Enterprise
    2010 2010 Report Fighting poverty through enterprise AGRISUD INTERNATIONAL 2010: Pushing Agroecology Editorial In 2010, hunger worldwide did not decrease. Almost soil conservation and human health, and doors wide nobody had heard the FAO ringing the alarm bells. open for agribusiness to take the helm, bringing the Still, we saw through that year a dreadful repeat of the risk of new disasters. 2008 «hunger riots», with the same violence and due to Do we really want the human and environmental situations equally inhuman. Food scarcity even ignited tragedies that we are witnessing today in India to be revolutions in some Arab countries. When people repeated in Africa? starve, conflicts, wars and now revolutions are not far This is not the path Agrisud is following. We believe behind. This announces troubled times. in reinvesting in the local production of food which Once again, the causes of these tragedies should be uses methods that are both efficient and human. We emphasised. believe in agroecology. Along with many others, we are Theoretically, the food supply is globally sufficient. The proving that agroecology can be intensive and offer a problem is its distribution. Very bad distribution brings serious alternative to the noxious models of intensive local food shortages, which have sudden and dramatic agriculture, thanks above all to practices which simply consequences. Such events arise when harvests are build a common sense and, often, on tradition. low – either in the country which is hit or worldwide As developed by Agrisud, ecology means sustainable – and when prices soar. More broadly, scarecity farming paying care to the environment and soil and high prices come from numbers of factors: the fertility, and to the health of the farmer as well as the decline of agricultural production for the local markets consumer.
    [Show full text]
  • Vers La Dissémination Des Pratiques Agroécologiques En Afrique De L'ouest
    Vers la dissémination des pratiques agroécologiques en Afrique de l’Ouest ? Compte-rendu des Rencontres de l’Agroécologie Du 16 au 19 Février 2015 à Betta, Burkina Faso Organisée par : Avec le soutien de : Table des matières : Introduction 3 Objectifs des Rencontres de l’Agroécologie 3 Le centre de formation et d’expérimentation de Tang Zougou 5 Ouverture des Rencontres : 6 Historique de la dynamique agroécologique initiée par Pierre Rabhi en Afrique de l’Ouest Table ronde : 7 L’agroécologie, une réponse aux défis alimentaires de l’Afrique subsaharienne ? Témoignages paysans : Expériences en agroécologie 11 Ateliers de démonstration pratique 13 Table ronde : Quels leviers pour la démultiplication de l’agroécologie ? 13 Ateliers de travail thématiques Atelier A : Accompagner les communautés paysannes vers la transition agroécologique 16 Atelier B : Expérimenter l’agroécologie 17 Atelier C : Valoriser les produits agroécologiques 19 Conférence de Pierre Rabhi 21 Préconisation des ONG pour la démultiplication de l’agroécologie 21 Cérémonie de clôture: Déclaration commune des participants 26 Conclusion 27 Annexe 1 : Programme des Rencontres de l’Agroécologie 2015 28 Annexe 2 : Couverture médiatique 30 Annexe 3 : Liste des participants 32 Compte-Rendu des Rencontres de l'Agroécologie - 16 au 19 Février 2015 Introduction Les Rencontres de l’Agroécologie organisées par Terre & Humanisme et ses partenaires ouest africains se sont déroulées au centre de formation en agroécologie de l’AIDMR (Association Inte- rzones pour le Développement en Milieu Rural) situé à Betta, dans la commune de Ziniaré, Burkina Faso, du 16 au 19 Février 2015. Ces Rencontres ont vu la participation de 145 acteurs de terrain, pay- sans, animateurs, formateurs, tous engagés dans la promotion de l’agroécologie de manières diverses, appartenant à 74 structures (ONG, organisations de producteurs, associations, média, etc.) et venant de 9 pays (Burkina Faso, Mali, Togo, Bénin, Niger, Mauritanie, Belgique et France).
    [Show full text]
  • FOOD SOVEREIGNTY, AGROECOLOGY and BIOCULTURAL DIVERSITY Constructing and Contesting Knowledge
    FOOD SOVEREIGNTY, AGROECOLOGY AND BIOCULTURAL DIVERSITY Constructing and Contesting Knowledge Edited by Michel P. Pimbert First published 2018 ISBN: 978-1-138-95535-6 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-138-95536-3 (pbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-66639-6 (ebk) 1 CONSTRUCTING KNOWLEDGE FOR FOOD SOVEREIGNTY, AGROECOLOGY AND BIOCULTURAL DIVERSITY An overview Michel P. Pimbert (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) 1 CONSTRUCTING KNOWLEDGE FOR FOOD SOVEREIGNTY, AGROECOLOGY AND BIOCULTURAL DIVERSITY An overview Michel P. Pimbert Introduction Much of the knowledge produced by mainstream research is inappropriate or directly harmful to local communities and the environments on which they depend for their food security, livelihoods and culture. Narrow-lens, universal and reductionist explanatory models have generated a crisis in agriculture and natural resource management through their inability to come to terms with the dynamic complexity and variation within and among ecosystems. Similarly, the science of economics and mainstream accounts of human demography embody several reduc- tionist biases, unproven assumptions and narrow historical perspectives that legiti- mize the dominant food regime and current land uses. As a result, global narratives on people-environment interactions blame the poor, women and ethnic minorities for social and environmental ills. Despite the fact they represent by far the vast majority of the world’s food and agricultural producers today (Lowder et al., 2016), small and family farmers, nomadic pasto- ralists and agro-pastoralists, indigenous peoples and forest dwellers, artisanal fish- ers and urban food producers are largely excluded from participation in research and policy debates on the future of food, farming, environment and development (Chambers et al., 1989; Chambers, 2008) – with women being the most excluded everywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 3 Ecospirituality the Concept of Ecospirituality Immediately Suggests That There Is a Kinship Between Ecology and Spirituality
    3 Ecospirituality AURÉLIE CHONÉ The concept of ecospirituality immediately suggests that there is a kinship between ecology and spirituality, that there is a spiritual dimension to ecology and that spirituality is indissociable from ecological concerns. Let us first take care to distinguish the spiritual from the religious. It is possible to pursue spirituality inside organized religion or out of any religious context, and even without having any faith in God. As it is founded on a personal inner experience, it is difficult to define it univocally, but it is generally associated with a quest for interiority, for self-knowledge, transcendence, wisdom, the sacred. Neither is there any simple definition of ecology, a notion which entered the mainstream in the 1970s in the wake of the first big natural disasters, but which in fact covers many different areas of interest (scientific ecology, political ecology, industrial ecology, etc.) which do not all take the same view of the preservation of nature. Spirituality and ecology seem to belong to two separate fields, since spirituality is linked to religious tradition, philosophical questionings or the quest for meaning, while ecology can be defined as a scientific discipline or a political movement (in a broad sense) fighting for the protection of the environment. Yet, since the 1980s, in North America, Europe and elsewhere, ecology and spirituality have been visibly drawing closer to each other through fertile intellectual exchanges (in religious circles, including new religious movements, as well as in academic circles) and through various social practices on local or global, individual or collective scales. This chapter aims at better understanding the values and actions of the proponents of ecospirituality, as well as the reasons, implications and limits of drawing such a connection.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report of the Paris Peace
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT Providing cooperative solutions to global problems 1 2 2018 ANNUAL REPORT Providing cooperative solutions to global problems 3 4 PARIS PEACE FORUM - 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 5 Table of contents 1. Paris Peace Forum: A New Organization for a New Goal............................... 9 Our Mission: Advancing Global Governance to Promote Sustainable Peace ...................................................... 9 Governance of the Association: Founding Members, Committees and Permanent Secretariat ................................10 Founding Members: Six Institutions Behind the Paris Peace Forum .....................10 The Executive Committee: The Main Decision Maker ....10 The teeringS Committee: Global Expertise for Strategic Guidance ................................. 11 The ermanentP Secretariat: Implementation and Operations ................................................ 11 6 PARIS PEACE FORUM - 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 2. Before the Forum: 5. Spreading the Word: Identifying Solutions to Global Problems .....................13 Media Impact and Visibility ............................................. 27 Call for Applications: Media Partners and Representation at the Forum ............29 860 Applications from all over the World .............................14 Social Media Activities ....................................................................29 121 Governance Projects Selected by the Selection Committee .......................................14 6. Circle of Partners: Engaging Major Governance Stakeholders ............... 31
    [Show full text]