DOCSLIB.ORG

Comprehensive Review of Potentially Anti-Comprehensive Laws and Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Comprehensive Review of Potentially Anti-Comprehensive Laws and Regulations APEC Economic Committee March 2020 Project Summary Report EC 04 2018A Comprehensive Review of Potentially Anti-Competitive Laws and Regulations Economic Committee February 2020 APEC Project EC 04 2018 A Produced by Philippines Project Team Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia +44 (0)1603 593715 For Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68919 600 Fax: (65) 68919 690 Email: [email protected] Website: www.apec.org © 2020 APEC Secretariat APEC#220-EC-01.2 2 | P a g e Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 7 APEC Secretariat’s RFP Project No. EC 04 2018A, “Comprehensive Review of Potentially Anti- Competitive Laws and Regulations.” ............................................................................................. 7 Preamble and Overview ...................................................................................................................... 7 1. Purpose of the Project ............................................................................................................ 7 2. Structure of this Project Report .............................................................................................. 7 3. Our Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 7 4 The Future ............................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 1 ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Merits of Competition Policy (and Competition Impact Assessment) ............................................. 9 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 10 Part A: background .................................................................................................................... 11 1.2 Competition .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Competition Impact Assessment .......................................................................................... 12 Part B Empirical Evidence ........................................................................................................... 13 1.4 Previous CIAs for other economies ....................................................................................... 13 1.5 The beneficial effects of deregulating markets: an ongoing meta-study ............................. 16 1.6 Advocacy ............................................................................................................................... 18 1.7 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter Two .............................................................................................................................. 20 Draft Manual ............................................................................................................................. 20 1 Executive summary ............................................................................................................. 21 1.1 What regulations can be reviewed? ..................................................................................... 21 1.2 Who should use the manual? ............................................................................................... 21 1.3 How does the review work? ................................................................................................. 21 1.4 Why should a review be performed? ................................................................................... 21 2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 22 2.1 Regulation often has competitive impacts ........................................................................... 22 2.2 Competition yields substantial economic benefits ............................................................... 22 2.3 Ensuring regulations are not anti-competitive is therefore worthwhile .............................. 22 2.4 Competition assessment of new and existing regulations is the best way to achieve this goal 22 2.5 Appropriate weight should be given to the results of competition assessment. ................. 23 3 Principles of competition assessment .................................................................................. 24 3.1 Limit barriers to entry for new companies ........................................................................... 24 3.1.1 Does the regulation create exclusive rights? ................................................................ 24 3.1.2 Does the regulation create license or permit systems? ............................................... 25 3 | P a g e 3.1.3 Does the regulation raise the cost for a company to enter or leave a business activity? 26 3.1.4 Does the regulation place geographical barriers on trade? ......................................... 26 3.2 Does the regulation restrict potentially competitive company actions? ............................. 26 3.2.1 Does the regulation establish price rules? .................................................................... 26 3.2.2 Does the regulation restrict advertising? ..................................................................... 27 3.2.3 Does the regulation set standards that would not be chosen by many informed consumers? ................................................................................................................................... 27 3.2.4 Does the regulation create differential costs of operation for businesses? ................. 27 3.3 Do not encourage potentially anti-competitive co-ordination by companies ..................... 28 3.3.1 Does the regulation create a self-regulatory regime? .................................................. 28 3.3.2 Does the regulation generate sharing of sensitive information? ................................. 28 3.3.3 Does the regulation exempt a company or industry from competition law? .............. 29 3.4 Ensure consumers receive sufficient information and choice .............................................. 29 3.4.1 Does the consumer have sufficient information and ability to choose well? .............. 29 4 Procedure for making regulation more pro-competitive ...................................................... 30 4.1 Identify those regulations to review ..................................................................................... 30 4.2 Apply the principled technical review to identify potential restrictions to competition ..... 30 4.3 For those potential restrictions identified, complete a more thorough review, gathering information and consulting as needed ............................................................................................. 30 4.4 For substantial, actual restrictions, identify alternatives ..................................................... 31 4.5 Compare alternatives and select preferred option(s) .......................................................... 31 4.6 Implement change ................................................................................................................ 31 5 How this process fits into the Philippines legal framework ................................................... 32 5.1 Advisory role of the competition authority .......................................................................... 32 5.2 Regulatory improvement structure ...................................................................................... 33 5.3 Consideration of competition in the legislative process ...................................................... 34 6 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 37 6.1 Competition assessment can be implemented with minimal resource investment ............ 37 6.2 Many economies have successfully carried out competition assessments.......................... 37 6.3 The benefits of competition assessment can be substantial ................................................ 38 7 Glossary ............................................................................................................................. 39 8 Further Reading .................................................................................................................. 41 The Manual in brief: a checklist .................................................................................................. 42 Limit barriers to entry for new companies ....................................................................................... 42 Does the regulation restrict potentially competitive company actions? ......................................... 42 Do not encourage potentially anti-competitive co-ordination by companies ................................. 42 Ensure consumers receive sufficient information and choice .......................................................... 42 4 | P a g e Annex for manual .....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • National Security Review

    National Security Review

    NATIONAL SECURITY REVIEW "Rethinking Philippine National Interests: Towards Calibrating National Policies" NATIONAL DEFENSE COLLEGE OF THE PHILIPPINES January 2016 - October 2017 1 Editorial Board RADM ROBERTO Q ESTIOKO AFP (RET), PhD, MNSA President, NDCP DIRECTOR ROLANDO G JUNGCO Executive Vice President DR THERESITA V ATIENZA Vice President for Academic Affairs & Dean MR ROSTUM J BAUTISTA, MNSA Chief, Academic Affairs Division PROFESSOR CHARITHIE B JOAQUIN Chief, Research and Special Studies Division ________________________________________________________________________ Editorial Staff Clarence Anthony P Dugenia Manmar C Francisco Christian O Vicedo Mico A Galang Arielle Ann Nicole I Lopez Mary Jonah G Vidal Louie John P Purcil Gee Lyn M Basa Managing Editor/Layout Artist Alberto S Faustino, Jr Cover Design Copyright October 2017 by NDCP This volume of the National Security Review is published by the Research and Special Studies Division (RSSD) of the National Defense College of the Philippines. The pa- pers compiled herein are solely of the authors and do not necessarily represent the suggestions are welcome and may be sent to RSSD, NDCP Camp Gen Emilio Aguinaldo, viewsQuezon and City, policies 1110 ofPhilippines their affiliated with governmentstelephone number and institutions. +632 9129125 Comments and email and address ndcp.rssd@gmail. com. 3 NATIONAL DEFENSE COLLEGE OF THE PHILIPPINES Vision To be the center of excellence in educational and policy development for strategic and dynamic leaders in national defense and security by 2022 Mission To prepare and develop potential national security leaders for high positions of responsibility and command, and undertake strategic research and policy studies to enhance national defense and security (PD 190 s.
  • Beware Big Men (Or Women) the Lesson of the Philippines

    Beware Big Men (Or Women) the Lesson of the Philippines

    DISCUSSION PAPER 11/2018 Beware Big Men (or Women) The lesson of the Philippines Greg Mills Strengthening Africa’s economic performance Beware Big Men (or Women) The lesson of the Philippines Contents Executive Summary .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 3 Introduction .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 4 The Roots of Bad Governance .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 4 Getting Rid of the Rent-Seekers? .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 7 Managing Divides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9 The Dangers of Duterteism .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 Upsides and downsides ….. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 13 Endnotes .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 14 About the Author Published in October 2018 by Dr Greg Mills heads the Johannesburg-based Brenthurst Foundation, estab- The Brenthurst Foundation lished in 2005 by the Oppenheimer family to strengthen African economic performance. He holds degrees from the Universities of Cape Town and Lancaster, and was the National Director of the SA Institute of International The Brenthurst Foundation Affairs from 1996 to 2005. He has directed numerous reform projects in more (Pty) Limited than a dozen African governments (including in 2017 for example with the PO Box 61631,
  • Populist Governance on the Rise: the Case of Dutertismo in the Philippines 2019

    Populist Governance on the Rise: the Case of Dutertismo in the Philippines 2019

    POPULIST GOVERNANCE ON THE RISE: THE CASE OF DUTERTISMO IN THE PHILIPPINES By ESPIRITU Rovil Angustia THESIS Submitted to KDI School of Public Policy and Management In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY 2019 POPULIST GOVERNANCE ON THE RISE: THE CASE OF DUTERTISMO IN THE PHILIPPINES By ESPIRITU Rovil Angustia THESIS Submitted to KDI School of Public Policy and Management In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY 2019 Professor Park, Hun Joo POPULIST GOVERNANCE ON THE RISE: THE CASE OF DUTERTISMO IN THE PHILIPPINES By ESPIRITU Rovil Angustia THESIS Submitted to KDI School of Public Policy and Management In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY Committee in charge: Professor Park, Hun Joo, Supervisor Professor Kim, Dong-Young Approval as of December, 2019 POPULIST GOVERNANCE ON THE RISE: THE CASE OF DUTERTISMO IN THE PHILIPPINES Abstract This study explores the central elements of Dutertismo – Rodrigo Duterte’s brand of populism in the Philippines in his first three years in office. Using Paul Taggart’s analytical theory on populism, this paper argues that upon Duterte’s assumption to office, he has used populism to maintain a steady grip on power, while concurrently portraying “Others”, particularly members of the once dominant Liberal Party, the media, Roman Catholic Church and most controversially, drug users as enemies of the State; and sheds light on how Duterte deals with reactions from external actors such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) and international human rights groups who, according to him, have been ‘attacking our sovereignty’.
  • Competition Law in the Philippines

    Competition Law in the Philippines

    Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, 2017, 0, 1–44 doi: 10.1093/jaenfo/jnx014 Article Competition law in the Philippines: economic, legal, and institutional context Mel Marquis* ABSTRACT Where democracy is fragile and institutions function poorly, particularly in a develop- ing country, competition law faces tremendous challenges. Getting a new agency started and getting the traction needed to ensure the successful launch and implemen- tation of a new competition framework cannot be taken for granted. Yet the effort is worthwhile, even if a country has had a history of ‘false dawns’ in this policy field. This article introduces the new competition regime in the Philippines. From a general per- spective it recalls that while competition law does not by itself guarantee sustainable and inclusive growth and development, it is a desirable part of a broader ensemble of policies that can promote those aims. In more country-specific terms, the new law dis- cussed here—the Competition Act 2015, fully effective since the summer of 2017— can only be properly considered by understanding the Philippines itself. The article therefore surveys the country’s governance and institutions; its economy; and the roles of the rule of law and the courts. The legal and institutional framework specific to com- petition law and policy is then analysed at length. The substance of the Act, the en- forcement and sanctioning powers of the Philippine Competition Commission, and relevant legal procedures are all examined. Now that the legislator has established a promising statutory framework, it is time to focus on the most difficult tasks of imple- mentation and deep culture change.
  • Metaphorizing the Philippine Presidency: Schemas of Presidential Leadership in the Post-Marcos State of the Nation Addresses (1987-2009)

    Metaphorizing the Philippine Presidency: Schemas of Presidential Leadership in the Post-Marcos State of the Nation Addresses (1987-2009)

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarBank@NUS METAPHORIZING THE PHILIPPINE PRESIDENCY: SCHEMAS OF PRESIDENTIAL LEADERSHIP IN THE POST-MARCOS STATE OF THE NATION ADDRESSES (1987-2009) By GENE SEGARRA NAVERA M.A. Speech Communication, University of the Philippines A dissertation submitted to the Department of English Language and Literature Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE March 2012 i Acknowledgments This thesis would not have been possible if not for the contributions and significant assistance given me by institutions and people for whom I will forever be grateful. I would like to thank Professor Michelle Maria Lazar, my supervisor, whose thoughtful and careful supervision enabled me to reconsider and distill my initial thoughts about the data and the subject matter. I am grateful to Professors Lionel Wee, Ismail Talib, and Bao Zhiming for their thought-provoking questions and invaluable suggestions during my thesis defense. Their comments, together with those of my anonymous external examiner, have been most helpful in enabling me to think further about the theoretical concerns of my research and in sharpening my critical argument. I am indebted to the National University of Singapore and the Department of English Language and Literature for granting me the research scholarship and for providing an educational environment conducive to independent study. My sincere thanks also go to the staff of the University of the Philippines (UP) Main Library, the UP National College of Public Administration and Governance, IBON Foundation, the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ), and the Congressional Library of the Philippine House of Representatives for making accessible archives and reference materials during my three-month library work in the Philippines.
  • Us-Philippines Cooperation on Terrorism: the Fight Against

    Us-Philippines Cooperation on Terrorism: the Fight Against

    U.S.-PHILIPPINES COOPERATION ON TERRORISM: THE FIGHT AGAINST THE ABU SAYYAF GROUP SINCE 9/11 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies And of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Studies By Carla P. Rivera, B.A. Georgetown University Washington, D.C. May 1, 2012 U.S. – PHILIPPINE COOPERATION ON TERRORISM: THE FIGHT AGAINST THE ABU SAYYAF GROUP SINCE 9/11 Carla P. Rivera, B.A. Mentor: Pamela Sodhy, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The September 11, 2001 attacks marked a pivotal point in the U.S.-Philippine relationship in that it reinvigorated the bilateral relationship, which had become distant after the closing of the U.S. bases in the Philippines in 1992. President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo immediately pledged the Philippines’ support for President George W. Bush’s global war on terror, and offered the U.S. the use of military bases in the Philippines. In turn, President Bush supported Arroyo’s struggle with terrorism in the Philippines by providing military training, equipment, and financial assistance. With this help from the U.S., the Philippines was able to more effectively combat the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG), an organization that has been terrorizing the Philippines since 1991 with its kidnapping of hostages, ransom demands, and some beheadings of its prisoners. The aim of this thesis is to trace the United States-Philippine response to the threat posed by the ASG. The scope of this thesis spans the period from 2001 to 2012, which covers both terms of the Bush Administration and the first three years of the Barack H.