DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Temiskaming Shores New Waste Management Capacity Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Temiskaming Shores New Waste Management Capacity Environmental Assessment CITY OF TEMISKAMING SHORES NEW WASTE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TERMS OF REFERENCE Submitted to: City of Temiskaming Shores 325 Farr Drive P.O. Box 2050 Haileybury, Ontario P0J 1K0 Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, a Division of AMEC Americas Limited 131 Fielding Road Lively, Ontario P3Y 1L7 May 2012 TY910491 City of Temiskaming Shores New Waste Management Capacity, Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference City of Temiskaming Shores, Ontario May 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... IV 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Proponent .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project History ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Initial and Refined Project Proposal .................................................................................... 2 1.4 Provincial Environmental Assessment Process .................................................................. 3 1.5 Federal Environmental Assessment Process ..................................................................... 5 2.0 PURPOSE OF THE EA STUDY ................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Current Landfill Capacity, Landfill Practice, Waste Characteristics .................................... 8 2.2 Identified Need .................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Summary of Purpose of EA Study ...................................................................................... 9 3.0 RATIONALE FOR AND DESCRIPTION OF THE UNDERTAKING .......................................... 11 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND POTENTIAL EFFECTS .................................. 12 4.1 Preliminary Study Area ..................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Data Collection .................................................................................................................. 12 4.3 Natural Environment ......................................................................................................... 13 4.4 Social, Economic and Cultural Environment ..................................................................... 14 4.5 Potential Environmental Effects and Mitigation ................................................................ 17 5.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE UNDERTAKING ............................................................................... 21 5.1 Identification of Alternatives To ......................................................................................... 21 5.2 Evaluation of Alternatives To ............................................................................................ 23 6.0 ALTERNATIVE METHODS ........................................................................................................ 25 6.1 Refining the Study Area .................................................................................................... 25 6.2 Identification of Alternative Methods ................................................................................. 26 6.3 Evaluation of Alternative Methods .................................................................................... 26 6.3.1 Site Selection Process ......................................................................................... 28 6.3.2 Evaluation of Alternative Designs, Operational Approaches ............................... 29 6.4 Concept Design, Environmental Effects of the Undertaking ............................................. 29 7.0 COMMITMENTS AND MONITORING ........................................................................................ 31 8.0 CONSULTATION PLAN ............................................................................................................. 32 8.1 Introduction and Background ............................................................................................ 32 8.2 Principles and Benefits of Engagement ............................................................................ 32 8.3 Plan Objectives and Purpose ............................................................................................ 33 8.4 Identification of Project Participants and Interested Parties ............................................. 34 8.4.1 General Approach ................................................................................................ 34 8.4.2 Aboriginal Communities ....................................................................................... 35 8.5 Consultation Approach ...................................................................................................... 37 TY910491 Page i City of Temiskaming Shores New Waste Management Capacity, Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference City of Temiskaming Shores, Ontario May 2012 8.6 Consultation Activities ....................................................................................................... 38 8.6.1 Public Notices ...................................................................................................... 38 8.6.2 Mail/Email Distributions ........................................................................................ 39 8.6.3 Newspaper Advertisements ................................................................................. 39 8.6.4 Project Website .................................................................................................... 39 8.6.5 Review of Documents and Reports ..................................................................... 40 8.6.6 Public Meetings and Stakeholder Workshops ..................................................... 41 8.7 Aboriginal Community Consultation .................................................................................. 42 8.8 Schedule and Key Decision-Making Points ...................................................................... 43 8.9 Documentation of Consultation ......................................................................................... 43 8.9.1 ToR Consultation Documentation ........................................................................ 43 8.9.2 EA Consultation Documentation .......................................................................... 44 8.10 Issues Resolution Strategy ............................................................................................... 44 8.11 Evaluation and Modification of the Consultation Plan ....................................................... 45 9.0 FLEXIBILITY TO ACCOMMODATE NEW CIRCUMSTANCES ................................................ 46 10.0 OTHER APPROVALS REQUIRED ............................................................................................ 47 11.0 EA REPORT PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION ................................................................... 48 12.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 49 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Waste Quantity Estimates Appendix B Preliminary List of Project Participants (Contact List) LIST OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 1 COTS - General Information Needs under CEAA 2 Draft WMMP - Executive Summary/Conclusions/ Recommendations TY910491 Page ii City of Temiskaming Shores New Waste Management Capacity, Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference City of Temiskaming Shores, Ontario May 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) PAGE LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1: Public Notices and Publication Dates .......................................................................................... 2 Table 4-1: Typical Concerns and Impact Management Measures ............................................................. 18 Table 5-1: Evaluation of Alternatives to - Preliminary List of Criteria.......................................................... 23 Table 6-1: Preliminary Criteria for Evaluation of Environmental Effects ..................................................... 27 Table 8-1: Evaluation Criteria for the Consultation Plan ............................................................................. 45 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1: Location Map .............................................................................................................................. 6 Figure 1-2: Environmental Assessment Process (Source: MOE, 2009) (Simplified) .................................... 7 Figure 4-1: Preliminary Regional Study Area .............................................................................................. 20 TY910491 Page iii City of Temiskaming Shores New Waste Management Capacity, Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference City of Temiskaming Shores, Ontario May 2012 ABBREVIATIONS AMEC AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, a Division of AMEC Americas Limited ATV All Terrain Vehicle CAZ Contaminant Attenuation Zone City City of Temiskaming Shores CEAA Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency DFO Federal Department of Fisheries and Ocean ECA Environmental Compliance Approval EAA (Ontario) Environmental Assessment Act EA Environmental Assessment EAB Environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on the Gradient IP Survey
    We are committed to providing accessible customer service. If you need accessible formats or communications supports, please contact us. Nous tenons à améliorer l’accessibilité des services à la clientèle. Si vous avez besoin de formats accessibles ou d’aide à la communication, veuillez nous contacter. 1 REPORT ON THE GRADIENT IP SURVEY MELBA AND BERNHARDT TOWNSHIPS DISTRICTS OF COCHRANE AND TIMISKAMING ONTARIO FOR JONATHAN CAMILLERI TABLE of CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Property 3. Location and Access 4. Regional and Property Geology 5. Previous work in the Area 6. Gradient IP Survey Program and Results 7. Summarry and Recommendations 8. Expenditure 9. References 10. Certificate of Qualification 11. Appendices LIST of TABLES Ta ble 1 Camilleri Melba Property MLAS Claims/cells Table 2 Table of Lithologic Units Melba and Bisley Twps LIST of FIGURES Figure 1 Property Location Figure 2 Camilleri Melba Property and MLAS Claims/cells Figure 3 Location and Access Figure 4 Airborne Residual Magnetic Field Survey Map, Melba Twp. Figure 5 Gradient IP Survey Lines-- Location Map Figure 6 Gradient IP survey Line 71 E Figure 7 Gradient IP Survey Line 72 E · 1. Introduction The Camilleri Melba Property (the Property) was aqulr�d for itl:i potential to host gold and copper mineralization of 1economic interest The' group of cl,aims is located in the northeast quadrant of Melba townsihip, approxill'}ately 15 km north of Kirkland Lake, District of Timiskaming, Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario. Between November 14 and 20, 2018, 2 lines of Gradient Induced Polarization (IP) surveying totaling 8 km were completed. The survey was carried out by Dan Patrie Exploration Ltd, with C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forest History Society of Ontario
    The Forest History Society of Ontario Ken Armson R.P. F Chair Founded 2009 Our mission: To further the knowledge, understanding and preservation Of Ontario’s forest history Member: The Ontario Historical Society 1 The Forest History Society of Ontario Our objectives: 1. To preserve forest and forest conservation history 2. To encourage and further the development and recognition of forest history 3. To support research and studies of forest history 4. To support the archival preservation of records and materials relating to forest history 5. To promote a better understanding of forest history through public education 2 The Forest History Society of Ontario What do we do? 1. We publish a newsletter Forestory twice a year (Spring & Fall) 2. We have a website: www.ontarioforesthistory.ca a) catalogue of forest history publications b) listing of forest history collections both in early stages of development c) all copies of Forestory d) upcoming events 3. We work with other provincial historical and heritage groups 3 The Forest History Society of Ontario Recent activities: 1. Collections - facilitated the move of the Ontario forest industry associations’ (OFIA & OLMA) to Archives Ontario 2. Supported the naming and installation of a plaque for the E.J. Zavitz Forest at St. Williams, Ontario ( with Port Rowan & South Walsingham Heritage ) 3. Developed a display on the history of forest inventory in Ontario with and at the Canadian Bushplane Heritage Centre in Sault Ste. Marie 4 The Forest History Society of Ontario Englehart Management Unit
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (Previously Submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013
    Summary of Consultation to Support the Côté Gold Project Closure Plan Côté Gold Project Appendix A IAMGOLD Côté Gold Project Aboriginal Consultation Plan (previously submitted to the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines in 2013 Stakeholder Consultation Plan (2013) TC180501 | October 2018 CÔTÉ GOLD PROJECT PROVINCIAL INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE APPENDIX D PROPOSED STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION PLAN Submitted to: IAMGOLD Corporation 401 Bay Street, Suite 3200 Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y4 Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, a Division of AMEC Americas Limited 160 Traders Blvd. East, Suite 110 Mississauga, Ontario L4Z 3K7 July 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Provincial EA and Consultation Plan Requirements ........................................... 1-1 1.3 Federal EA and Consultation Plan Requirements .............................................. 1-2 1.4 Responsibility for Plan Implementation .............................................................. 1-3 2.0 CONSULTATION APPROACH ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Goals and Objectives ......................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Stakeholder Identification ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Community Profiles for the Oneca Education And
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 Political/Territorial Facts About This Community Phone Number First Nation and Address Nation and Region Organization or and Fax Number Affiliation (if any) • Census data from 2006 states Aamjiwnaang First that there are 706 residents. Nation • This is a Chippewa (Ojibwe) community located on the (Sarnia) (519) 336‐8410 Anishinabek Nation shores of the St. Clair River near SFNS Sarnia, Ontario. 978 Tashmoo Avenue (Fax) 336‐0382 • There are 253 private dwellings in this community. SARNIA, Ontario (Southwest Region) • The land base is 12.57 square kilometres. N7T 7H5 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 506 residents. Alderville First Nation • This community is located in South‐Central Ontario. It is 11696 Second Line (905) 352‐2011 Anishinabek Nation intersected by County Road 45, and is located on the south side P.O. Box 46 (Fax) 352‐3242 Ogemawahj of Rice Lake and is 30km north of Cobourg. ROSENEATH, Ontario (Southeast Region) • There are 237 private dwellings in this community. K0K 2X0 • The land base is 12.52 square kilometres. COPYRIGHT OF THE ONECA EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM 1 FIRST NATION COMMUNITY PROFILES 2010 • Census data from 2006 states that there are 406 residents. • This Algonquin community Algonquins of called Pikwàkanagàn is situated Pikwakanagan First on the beautiful shores of the Nation (613) 625‐2800 Bonnechere River and Golden Anishinabek Nation Lake. It is located off of Highway P.O. Box 100 (Fax) 625‐1149 N/A 60 and is 1 1/2 hours west of Ottawa and 1 1/2 hours south of GOLDEN LAKE, Ontario Algonquin Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Description Larder and Raven Hydroelectric Generating Station
    Project Description Larder and Raven Hydroelectric Generating Station 1 Distribution: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Federal Agencies to be contacted by the Federal Environmental Assessment Coordinator Environment Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada Health Canada Indian and Northern Affairs Canada Natural Resources Canada Transport Canada Other departments as identified by CEAA Provincial Agencies Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs Ministry of Tourism and Culture Ministry of Energy and Infrastructure Ministry of the Environment Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Ministry of Natural Resources Ministry of Transportation Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry Ontario Waterpower Association Ontario Parks- Larder Lake Provincial Park Municipal Town of Larder Lake and Township of Larder Lake Town of Englehart Township of McGarry Township of Evanturel Town of Kirkland Lake First Nations Matachewan First Nation Beaverhouse First Nation Métis Nation of Ontario Wabun Tribal Council 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................. 5 1.1 GENERAL ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1.1 Name and Proposed Location of Project ................................................................ 5 1.1.2 Nature of the Project ................................................................................................ 5 1.1.3 Purpose of the Project .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009 – 2010
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from the President .............................................................................................................3 Message from the Board Chair ..........................................................................................................5 Board of Governors ..........................................................................................................................6 College Administrators ......................................................................................................................7 Vision Mission ..................................................................................................................................8 Strategic Operating Plan Overview ....................................................................................................9 Strategies and Accomplishments: Focus on Community-Based Access ...........................................10 Strategies and Accomplishments: Focus on Aboriginal Choices and Directions ................................13 Strategies and Accomplishments: Focus on Organizational Development and Renewal ...................17 Strategies and Accomplishments: Focus on Learners ......................................................................19 Strategies and Accomplishments: Focus on Human Resources .......................................................23 Appendix: 2009-2010 College Facts Appendix: Financial Statements ANNUAL REPORT 2009-2010 2 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Our 2009 Annual Report remarked
    [Show full text]
  • Bunker Open Seven Days a Week Darlene Wroe Speaker Reporter
    Fire Rated Man Door with Smile. Fire Rated Lock Set. We put the enjoyment OPTIONS, SOLUTIONS back into life! & SERVICE THAT Come talk to Sean about 21 Whitewood Avenue E., New Liskeard WORKS. our pain free dentures. 705•647•6888 | 1•866•840•6888 No referral necessary. temiskamingdenturecenter.ca 705-672-2488 • JPLSTORAGE.CA 1-888-672-2488 THE SPEAKER’S WEEKEND eekender EDITION WVol. 18 – No. 30 FRIDAY, JUNE 28, 2019 Visit us on Bunker open seven days a week Darlene Wroe Speaker Reporter COBALT - The Bunker Military Museum has a full complement of summer students thanks to fed- eral and provincial funding. The museum is now open from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. seven days a week, with three summer stu- dents who are eager to show visitors the interest- ing artifacts at the museum. Located at 24 Prospect Avenue in Cobalt, the Bunker provides a fascinating glimpse back into the lives, equipment, uniforms and stories related to the people who participated in past conicts. Eleven-year-old Chris Pichette cooled o as he slipped and slid at the Earlton park June 22. The Fun in the Sun Museum board president Marg Harrison says event marked the opening of the Earlton pool to the public for the season. Activities were sponsored by Armstrong the museum is about the people who took part Township and the recreation committee, and were supported by the volunteer re department, the Centre de santé in the wars, and not about the wars themselves. communautaire du Témiskaming, and the EarlyON program. (Sta photo by Diane Johnston) Continued on 3a DID YOU GET The Speaker THIS WEEK? Here are some of the stories in our June 26 edition… • The Temiskaming Shores and Area Rotary Club has made a big splash in proposing the construction of a splash pad for the New Liskeard waterfront.
    [Show full text]
  • Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act - Annual Report
    Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act - Annual Report Reporting Entity Name Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. Reporting Year From 1/1/2019 To: 12/31/2019 Date submitted 7/2/2020 Original Submission Reporting Entity ESTMA Identification Number E936050 Amended Report Other Subsidiaries Included (optional field) For Consolidated Reports - Subsidiary E597613 Kirkland Lake Gold Inc., E246746 St Andrew Goldfields Ltd, E425485 Fosterville Gold Mine Pty Ltd., E573013 NT Reporting Entities Included in Report: Mining Operations Pty Ltd., E680819 Detour Gold Corporation Not Substituted Attestation by Reporting Entity In accordance with the requirements of the ESTMA, and in particular section 9 thereof, I attest I have reviewed the information contained in the ESTMA report for the entity(ies) listed above. Based on my knowledge, and having exercised reasonable diligence, the information in the ESTMA report is true, accurate and complete in all material respects for the purposes of the Act, for the reporting year listed above. Full Name of Director or Officer of Reporting Entity David Soares Date 6/22/2020 Position Title Chief Financial Officer Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act - Annual Report Reporting Year From: 1/1/2019 To: 12/31/2019 Reporting Entity NameKirkland Lake Gold Ltd. Currency of the Report USD Reporting Entity ESTMA E936050 Identification Number Subsidiary Reporting Entities (if E597613 Kirkland Lake Gold Inc., E246746 St Andrew Goldfields Ltd, E425485 Fosterville Gold Mine Pty Ltd., E573013 NT Mining Operations Pty Ltd., necessary)
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Peoples' Advisory Committee Minutes of The
    INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD Tuesday, March 20, 2018 @ 11:00 a.m. Schumacher Board Office – with v/c to NLBO Committee Members Present: Howard Archibald - First Nations Trustee – DSB Ontario North East and Chair of IPAC Neil Iserhoff - Education Director, Taykwa Tagamou Nation Arline Chasle - Director of Education, Timiskaming First Nation Lorraine Chokomolin - Director of Education, Wahgoshig First Nation Cathy Naveau - Education Director, Mattagami First Nation Saunders Porter - Trustee, DSB Ontario North East Rosemary Pochopsky - Trustee, DSB Ontario North East Committee Members Absent: Doug Shearer - Trustee, DSB Ontario North East Samantha Schram - Education Officer, Matachewan First Nation Lynn Mongrain - Representative, Temagami First Nation Administration Present: Lesleigh Dye - Director of Education, District School Board Ontario North East (NLBO) Michelle Leigh - Superintendent of Schools Administration Absent: Pearl Fong-West - Superintendent of Business and Finance Resource Persons & Regular Guests Present Jack Solomon - Executive Director, Kapuskasing Indian Friendship Centre Audrey McLaren - Education Partnership Coordinator, Timiskaming First Nation Margaret Edwards - Wahgoshig First Nation Mylon Ollila - Executive Director, Wahgoshig First Nation Alison - Mattagami FN Lisa Innes - Indigenous System Lead Resource Persons & Regular Guests -Absent Veronica Nicholson - Executive Director, Timmins Native Friendship Centre Bernice Brunette - Executive Director, Ininew Indian Friendship Centre, Cochrane Chris Makay - Wawatay FN Irene Tomatuk - Director of Education, Mushkegowuk Council (t/c Moose Factory) James Wesley - Kashechewan First Nation Derek McKay - Student Success Coordinator, Mattagami First Nation Recording Secretary Susan Allen, Executive Assistant to Lesleigh Dye, Director of Education Indigenous Peoples Advisory Committee Meeting 2018 03 20 – Minutes Page 2 1.0 Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 11:10 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 CONSULTATION SUMMARY 4.1 Overview an Important Part of The
    4.0 CONSULTATION SUMMARY 4.1 Overview An important part of the Project permitting and planning process is proactive consultation with potentially affected and interested stakeholders, Aboriginal communities and government agencies. For the Project, consultation has involved informing and engaging these respective Parties about the development of the Project, responding to their interests and concerns, and continuing to build and maintain positive relationships. This has been and is currently being achieved, by creating avenues for dialogue and information exchange (verbal and written), and by fostering an ongoing relationship between IAMGOLD and these stakeholder and Aboriginal groups. IAMGOLD and the Federal and Provincial government agencies recognize opportunities for synergy in planning and implementing stakeholder engagement and consultation for their respective Environmental Assessment (EA) processes, and will attempt to align consultation activities to the extent practical. IAMGOLD developed a Stakeholder Consultation Plan and Aboriginal Consultation Plan (see Appendix C) to coordinate consultation activities as much as possible without the need for duplication of effort. These plans were included as part of IAMGOLD’s submission of the Project Description (PD) and revised for the Terms of Reference (ToR). The stakeholder consultation plans were developed based on guidance provided in the Provincial and Federal consultation planning and requirements for EAs. These plans also follow IAMGOLD’s standards and best practices for community
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 CONSULTATION SUMMARY 4.1 Introduction IAMGOLD Recognizes
    4.0 CONSULTATION SUMMARY 4.1 Introduction IAMGOLD recognizes that an important part of the Project permitting and planning process is proactive consultation with potentially affected and interested stakeholders, Aboriginal communities and government agencies. Consultation to date has involved informing and engaging these respective parties about the development of the Project, including the environmental assessment (EA) process, responding to their interests and concerns, and continuing to build and maintain positive relationships. This has been and is currently being achieved by creating avenues for dialogue and information exchange (verbal and written), and by fostering an ongoing relationship between IAMGOLD and these stakeholder and Aboriginal groups. As outlined in Chapter 2, IAMGOLD is required to meet the requirements of both Federal and Provincial EA processes which includes the consultation of local stakeholders, government agencies and potentially affected Aboriginal communities. This chapter will capture how IAMGOLD has met these requirements, or where applicable, gone beyond these requirements to ensure adequate and meaningful consultation. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) developed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Guidelines for the Côté Gold Project for the preparation of an EIS under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012. These Guidelines were approved by the Agency on July 9, 2013 and outline public participation and Aboriginal consultation requirements and expectations. IAMGOLD is
    [Show full text]
  • Teddy's Falls Waterpower Project
    OEL-HYDROSYS TEDDY’S FALLS WATERPOWER PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR WATERPOWER PROJECTS PREPARED FOR: WENDIGO POWER PARTNERSHIP INC. 9094 CAVANAGH ROAD ASHTON, ONTARIO K0A 1B0 PREPARED BY: OEL-HYDROSYS INC. 3108 CARP ROAD, BOX 430 OTTAWA, ONTARIO K0A 1L0 MARCH 2012 TEDDY’S FALLS WATERPOWER PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR WATERPOWER PROJECTS Prepared for: WENDIGO POWER PARTNERSHIP INC. 9094 Cavanagh Road Ashton, Ontario K0A 1B0 Prepared by: OEL-HYDROSYS INC. 3108 Carp Road, Box 430 Ottawa, Ontario K0A 1L0 File No. OE9580 March 2012 Ref: OE9580 Teddy’s Falls Waterpower Project Description March2012 Teddy’s Falls Waterpower - Project Description TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Distribution .................................................................................................................. 2 1.2. Contact Information ..................................................................................................... 3 2. PROJECT INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 4 2.1. Project Area .................................................................................................................. 4 2.2. Project Location...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]